New School Staff Training Video Compares White People to Mosquitoes

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) One of the videos that was shown to some people who work in one of the New Prague, Minn., schools compared white people to mosquitoes who are inherently biased against non-white people, justifying the murder of white people by nonwhites.

The other video that was shown to the school staff was also very racist toward white people.

“Just imagine, instead of being a stupid comment, a microaggression is a mosquito bite,” one of the videos teaching about microaggressions said.

The narrator in the video also said that some people — the ones with darker skin — are “bitten” by “mosquitoes” a lot more than others.

According to the white-hating leftists, telling non-white people that they are well-spoken, complimenting their hair, or asking when a person is going to have a baby are all examples of microaggressions.

The narrator in the video went as far as to say that some microaggressions “can even kill you,” showing a man who shot someone because “it looked like he was up to trouble.”

It was also told in the video that frequently getting bit by mosquitoes is annoying and “makes you want to go ballistic on those mosquitoes, which seems like a huge overreaction to people who only get bit every once in a while.”

The video then tried justifying the murder of white people by non-white people by showing a black woman using a flamethrower to kill the “mosquitos.”

When contacted by Alpha News, New Prague Superintendent Andrew Vollmuth responded to the content of the video by saying that the school staff was shown a different “version of the video,” even though this version couldn’t be found anywhere. Vollmuth also didn’t provide the version himself.

In his response to Alpha News, Vollmuth also included some talking points about diversity, equity and inclusion, adding that the videos were part of staff professional development to “proactively address the needs of our increasingly diverse community.”

McCarthy Allies Tell Gaetz to ‘F*ck Off’ after Conspiratorial Accusations Fly 

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., reportedly exchanged heated words, with Gaetz leveling accusations of a McCarthy-led smear campaign against him.

The altercation occurred during a House GOP conference on Thursday and eventually devolved into a profanity-laden exchange between firebrand lawmakers.

According to reports, Gaetz accused McCarthy of orchestrating a campaign involving “MAGA influencers paid to attack Matt.” In response, McCarthy dismissed the allegations, alleging he “wouldn’t waste his time on Gaetz like that.”

Tensions flared, igniting one lawmaker to tell the other to “F— off,” as another labeled his counterpart a “scumbag,” according to Fox News. 

The alleged argument also shifted toward fundraising efforts, with a defiant McCarthy challenging Gaetz, saying, “Tomorrow I’m spending my time giving $5 million [to GOP candidates and members] to expand our majority. What are you doing to help our majority?” 

Gaetz confirmed the altercation to Fox, expressing he initially believed McCarthy was the mastermind behind the campaign. “I asked him whether or not he was paying those influencers to post negative things about me online,” Gaetz stated. 

When asked if the confrontation had made him angry, Gaetz quipped, “My blood pressure is like 120 over 80. So I’m feeling great.” 

However, McCarthy’s office denied having any involvement in the politically negative posts against Gaetz but blamed a Democratic Party-aligned group. 

An attorney for McCarthy reportedly sent a cease-and-desist letter to the individuals he believed were behind the anti-Gaetz campaign. 

“I am outside counsel to Speaker Kevin McCarthy. I understand based on multiple reporter inquiries that reference your name that you are reaching out to social media influencers about a ‘Against Gaetz and government shutdown’ and claiming it is on behalf of Speaker McCarthy and/or entities purportedly affiliated with the Speaker. That is false and in violation of the law,” the letter read.  

“This email puts you on notice that you must immediately cease and desist or we will move forward with all remedies under the law including the pursuit of damages where warranted.” 

This public feud follows Gaetz’s recent opposition to a defense spending bill, in which he cited McCarthy’s promise to pass legislation issue by issue. In addition, Gaetz had pledged to lead efforts to oust McCarthy from the speakership if he continues to violate his promises to staunch conservatives in the House. 

CNN Forced to Correct ‘Squad’ Rep. After She Claims Border is ‘Secure’

(Headline USA) Even CNN was forced to push back on a claim from “Squad” Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., claim this week that the southern border was “secure.”

During an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper on Wednesday, Pressley insisted that the Biden administration had the situation at the border under control, even as she acknowledged that tens of thousands of migrants were being apprehended crossing illegally every week.

“No doubt about it, our border is secure, and we are in the midst of a humanitarian crisis, and we have to fix a broken system,” Pressley said, before being interrupted by Tapper.

“You think the border is secure?” Tapper asked. “Or is it not secure?”

Pressley tried to dodge the question, saying America is “in the midst of a humanitarian crisis,” but Tapper continued to press her.

“But just to get some clarity on this, and sure it is a conversation for another day, but do you think that the border is secure? Is that what you said?” he asked.

Pressley reiterated: “Yes, the border is secure. And we’re in the midst of a humanitarian crisis that has been created by a broken system.”

Tapper pointed out that “millions of undocumented migrants” are “coming into the country.”

“I’m not disagreeing with anything you’re saying, except for the idea that the border is secure. If you have people crossing the border, it’s just by definition not secure,” Tapper said. 

Tapper went on to say Pressley is refusing “to acknowledge reality.”

But Pressley dodged the question again, arguing that “asylum is a human right.”

The Biden administration has similarly tried to portray the border as secure despite video footage showing thousands of migrants streaming into the country and into overwhelmed border towns.

“The president has done more to secure the border and to deal with the issue of immigration than anybody else. He really has,” White House press secretary Karine Jean–Pierre claimed last week.

Elon Musk Says He Would Rather Go To Jail Than Fire Workers Who Refused Vax

(Headline USA) Tech billionaire Elon Musk said this week that he would rather “go to prison” than fire his employees for refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine.

The Twitter and Tesla owner shared a video this week exposing the inefficacy of COVID-19 vaccination, rhetorically asking whether anyone was aware of the information.

In a follow-up tweet, Musk clarified that he isn’t concerned about whether people choose to get the jab for themselves, but that he opposes “the outrageous demand that people *must* take the vaccine and multiple boosters to do anything at all.”

“That was messed up,” he said in what seemed to be a reference to the many Democratic cities and employers that mandated vaccination during the pandemic.

Musk also called out President Joe Biden for attempting to impose a vaccine mandate on all public and private employees. 

“Until the Supreme Court invalidated Biden’s exec order, SpaceX and many other companies would have been forced to fire anyone who refused to get vaccinated,” Musk said. “We would not have done so. I would rather go to prison than fire good people who didn’t want to be jabbed.”

Musk has previously said that he received a Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine shot and two mRNA shots.

“I had major side effects from my second booster shot,” Musk posted earlier this year. “Felt like I was dying for several days. Hopefully, no permanent damage, but I dunno.”

He added this week that he “believes” in vaccines but does not want debate over their use to be squashed.

“It’s not like I don’t believe in vaccines—I do,” he wrote.

“However, the cure cannot be potentially worse than the disease,” he added. “And public debate over efficacy should not be shut down. There is also great potential for curing many diseases using synthetic mRNA, so let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water.”

Sam Bankman-Fried’s Parents Next in Line for Fraud Charges

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Recent reports revealed Sam Bankman–Fried’s parents attempted to run FTX as a family business, and often took funds from the company to pay for their exorbitant lifestyle.

Bankman–Fried, owner and orchestrater of the FTX crypto fraud scheme, included his parents in the hustle. In turn, they “exploited their access and influence within the FTX enterprise to enrich themselves,” according to Slate.

Investigators caught Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried knowingly defrauding FTX customers via their connection, leading to a lawsuit which may not allow for the recovery of the funds.

Bankman’s involvement in the business was heavy, taking care of just about everything—with the exception of actual trading and minting of coins. He directed payments through the company, handpicked nonprofits and organizations to receive donations and approved large, luxurious expenses for himself and his wife.

Bankman spent several years working in tax law—making the suspect filings even more suspicious, as he either should have caught them lest he bear legal responsibility for them,

Fried took funds from the company to pay for her political action committee—a Democratic organization called Mind the Gap.

The PAC received “tens of millions” of dollars from Bankman–Fried, according to the legal complaint against the family.

An email from Fried to her son, sent in August 2022, contained a detailed plan for using another FTX employee to make PAC contributions in his name.

Other evidence included a phone call where Bankman complained to his son about his lax salary of $200,000 per year—as opposed to the expected $1 million.

“Gee, Sam I don’t know what to say here,” he wrote in an email cited in the suit. “This is the first [I] have heard of the 200K a year salary!”

Shortly after the call, Bankman–Fried gifted $10 million to the Alameda Research Center—FTX’s sister hedge fund—and provided funds for their $16.4 million home in the Bahamas.

Both Bankman and Fried faced lawsuits by FTX users for misuse of funds, who are on a “relentless pursuit of total destruction.”

Bankman and Fried previously worked at Stanford Law School as professors.

FTX’s debtors claimed the donations “were seemingly designed to boost Bankman and Fried’s professional and social status at the expense of the FTX Group.”

Ariz. Gov. Katie Hobbs Temporarily Cedes Power to Republican, Fueling Mystery

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) Arizona’s Democrat Gov. Katie Hobbs temporarily designated Republican state Treasurer Kimberly Yee as acting governor after mysteriously stepping down Wednesday night with no explanation, the Liberty Daily reported.

Some even wondered if Hobbs may have been under investigation or indicted for a racketeering conspiracy in a move that would parallel the lawfare attack being waged on Republican former President Donald Trump and 18 others in Fulton County, Georgia.

However, Arizona’s state Senate maintained there was no such indictment issued, said U.S. News & World Report.

Hobbs—whose legitimacy continues to be challenged in court by 2022 Republican candidate Kari Lake following an election fraught with irregularities and suspicious activity—was expected to return on Thursday and reclaim her authority.

Yee, who third in Arizona’s line of succession for governor, skipped ahead of the secretary of state and the attorney general, both of whom are Democrats.

That fueled even more speculation surrounding the strange sudden departure, especially after Monday’s heated battle in the Arizona state legislature over the appointment of directors for 13 state agencies, including the Department of Administration and Department of Economic Security. 

When Hobbs failed to get her nominations confirmed by the legislature’s Republican majority, she resorted to appointing them as “executive deputy directors” instead.

Yee and other Republican leaders refused to recognize the radical appointees named by Hobbs, TownHall noted.

“I believe she is thumbing her nose at the law,” Yee said. She explained that it could result in other rogue, unelected offials sitting in top positions and making executive decisions.

And yet, with the opportunity to step in, Yee refrained from naming directors herself.

“I do hope when the governor returns to Arizona, she will promptly name qualified directors to these important state agencies,” Yee said in a press release.

“I expect to see a swift resolution to this matter, so we can get back to getting the work done for Arizona taxpayers,” she continued. “The people of Arizona deserve leaders who follow the rule of law.”

Yee also did not address the governor’s absence in her press release.

All of this was happening as President Joe Biden arrived in Arizona on Wednesday night for a speech at the McCain Institute, based out of Arizona State University in Phoenix, the state capital.

It’s possible that no Democrats are willing to associate with Biden’s administration due to his failure to enforce immigration policies, especially in a border state like Arizona.

Then again, it seems unlikely that Hobbs, a well-known beneficiary of George Soros’s patronage, would shy away from her support of open-border policies.

Either way, Twitter users were quick to

“Republican Kimberly Yee is currently the Acting Governor of Arizona while the fraud Katie Hobbs is …. where exactly?? WTF is going on in Arizona?!,” wrote former Washington Times opinion editor Monica Crowley. 

A post appearing to originate from the private Instagram account of a Washington, D.C., congressional staffer named Hayden Michael suggested that Hobbs may have traded cities with Biden for the day.

Conservative rabble-rouser Laura Loomer joined the chorus asking, “Why is @katiehobbs no longer Governor tonight? What’s happening in Arizona?”

“I think Katie Hobbs is converting to Republican,” quipped another Twitter user by the name of Alex.

Ex-Proud Boys/Patriot Front FBI Informant Given ‘Time Served’ for Gun Felony

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) An FBI informant who was a member of the Proud Boys, the white nationalist Patriot Front and the neo-Nazi group The Base—and who allegedly stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021—was given “time served” for a recent felony gun charge.

The defendant, Michael Alan Jones, was sentenced to time served and two years of supervised release for unlawfully possessing a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon—a charge stemming from a March 2022 traffic stop in upstate New York, where police officers allegedly found him in possession of an illegally modified AR-15.

Jones had previously been convicted of two felony sex crimes. His lawyer said Jones’s “then-minor girlfriend twice performed oral sex on him in the boys’ bathroom of their high school.”

Last week, his lawyer asked a court to avoid more prison time for his latest crime. Jones had already served about six months in prison, and has been on home detention since last December, when his leg almost had to be amputated, according to his lawyer.

Jones’s lawyer admitted in a recent letter that his client was a member of the Proud Boys.

“However, since that time, he has changed his thinking and actually worked as a paid FBI informant who infiltrated the Charlotte chapter of the Proud Boys and gave agents valuable information about the organization,” Jones’s lawyer said.

“Jones has since matured and no longer harbors these views. In fact, renouncing these views was a prerequisite for his parents allowing him to come back to their home after he was released from jail,” he said, omitting Jones’s past affiliations with the Patriot Front, The Base or J6.

The Justice Department, for its part, asked for Jones to serve 24- to 30-months imprisonment, arguing that such a punishment is consistent with sentencing guidelines.

Jones’s arrest last year reportedly made waves among the Proud Boys and other right-wing groups. The left-leaning media outlet Raw Story obtained leaked messages that showed them discussing Jones.

“They created a whole new degree of f—ed-upness,” a member identified as “Jimbob Smith” reportedly said on Telegram. “It’s a fed-ophile. It was a fed informant mixed with a pedophile. Only Charlotte can do that!”

Raw Story also reported that Jones “fought with the police alongside the Proud Boys at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.” Jones has not been charged in relation to J6.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

OpenAI Head Gives Projected Date for ‘Singularity’ in Panel w/ Musk, Netanyahu

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Greg Brockman, the head of tech startup OpenAI, told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a roundtable on artificial-intelligence safety that man and machine will merge, forming a “singularity” in 2030, according to the Discern Report.

The eye-opening remarks came during a panel discussion last week that also featured billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk and physicist Max Tegmark of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Brockman said that in 2029, AI will surpass human intelligence, and by 2030, man will become one with the machines.

Eventually, computers will reach a level so far beyond human capability that it will be necessary to distinguish between artificial general intelligence (AGI) and artificial superintelligence (ASI), researchers say.

While that may send out alarm bells for some—particulary given the short window of time he projected, given the rapid advancement in machine-learning technology—Brockman claimed the project was worthy of pursuit because it could lead to the creation of “heaven” on earth.

“I think this whole arc, in my mind, is all about paradigm shift, right?” he said.

“And I think that, even the question of what would that heaven, post-AGI, positive future look like?” he added. “I think even that is hard for us to imagine what the true upside could be.”

Fortunately, for those who can’t wait to find out what mysteries used to be relegated to the afterlife, the wait to find out is less than seven years away, according to Brockman.

He estimated that “2030 is when the merge happens,” pointing to one of Musk’s recent projects in particular.

“So we’ve got Neuralink coming—and uh, you know, maybe other systems like that,” Brockman said.

According to the OpenAI guru, the 2030 prediction, while mocked at first, is now “basically common wisdom.”

Musk was less optimistic about what might happen when machines surpassed humans, warning that it was unclear what would be the fate of the human race after superintelligence was created.

“You know, sometimes digital superintelligence is called, like, a singularity—like a black hole,” he said.

“Because just like with a black hole, it’s difficult to predict what happens after you pass the event horizon,” he added. “… And we are currently circling the event horizon of the black hole that is digital superintelligence.”

What exactly the merging of man and machine might look like remains unclear.

The prediction goes hand-in-hand with a report from earlier this month, claiming that AI bots will generate the majority of online content by 2026.

Further complicating things, the so-called superintelligence will nonetheless take its marching orders from partisans who wish to enshrine in it political correctness, to be enforced by the all-powerful machines.

FBI Appears to Be Slow-Walking, Stonewalling Major Probe into 2020 Voter Registration Fraud

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) The FBI took over a probe into voter registration in 2020, but has since refused to provide any information on the case, recently denying a Freedom of Information Act request into the investigation.

The case, which originated in Muskegon, Michigan, looked into the involvement of a firm called GBI Strategies, which was under suspicion for registration fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

City and state level authorities looked into the matter before the FBI stepped in, according to Just the News.

Officials in the state of Michigan submitted a FOIA request in 2022, to no avail. The FBI released no new evidence since they took over the case, and rejected the request by claiming the investigation was ongoing.

The FOIA request asked for “copies of all reports, documents, and records about GBI Strategies, including all communication and correspondence regarding investigations of GBI Strategies with Michigan government officials, city and state law enforcement agencies in Michigan, and all other state government officials and law enforcement agencies involved in investigations of GBI Strategies.”

The FBI responded, saying the requested information “is exempt from disclosure.”

“The records responsive to your request are law enforcement records; there is a pending or prospective law enforcement proceeding relevant to these responsive records, and release of the information could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings,” the FBI’s response added.

Michigan State Police described the crime as “Election Fraud by Forgery.”

Michigan’s attorney general, Dana Nessel, confirmed the existence of a state-level investigation into thousands of suspicious voter registration forms. The state authorities sent this evidence along to the FBI as well.

The Muskegon city clerk alerted the proper authorities when surveying the registration forms.

“None of the fraudulent material was incorporated into the state’s qualified voter file, and this had no effect on any ballot requests or associated processes,” said Danny Wimmer, press secretary for the State Attorney General. “This attempted fraud was detected because the system worked.”

Hysterical Dems Say Biden Impeachment Hearing ‘Threatens the Wellbeing of Every American’

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Democrats tried to derail Thursday’s congressional impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden before it even began, claiming that it “threatens the wellbeing of every American” with a potential federal government shutdown looming.

“We’re 62 hours away from shutting down the government of the United States of America and Republicans are launching an impeachment drive, based on a long debunked and discredited lie,” Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the Oversight panel, said at the outset of the hearing.

Raskin questioned the legitimacy of the hearing, accusing Republicans of rehashing five-year-old allegations from Donald Trump.

Raskin then floated his own conspiracy theory that Trump is the one pulling the strings of the impeachment procedures.

“To delay prosecution, Trump would withhold paychecks for millions of [government] workers,” Raskin said.

In an attempt to derail the proceedings, Raskin motioned to subpoena Rudy Guliani and his former business associate, Lev Parnas, who worked to dig up dirt on Biden in the runup to the 2020 election. Parnas, who was sentenced to 20 months in prison for campaign finance crimes last year after pleading guilty to wire fraud charges, has since disavowed the Biden corruption allegations.

Raskin claimed Guliani and Parnas are “key figures” in the Biden impeachment proceedings.

“Key figures for what?” an incredulous House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., asked, explaining to Raskin that the purpose of the hearing was to examine evidence of whether Biden should be impeached.

The committee eventually voted to table Raskin’s motion.

Thursday’s hearing didn’t feature witnesses with information about the Bidens or Hunter Biden’s business work. Instead, the panel heard from outside experts in tax law, criminal investigations and constitutional legal theory.

A top Republican witness, Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor who is an expert in impeachment issues, said he believed the House had passed the threshold for an inquiry but that the current evidence was not enough for charges.

Democrats, who decry the investigation as a political ploy aimed at hurting Biden and helping Trump as he runs again for president, brought in Michael Gerhardt, a law professor who has also appeared as an expert in previous impeachment proceedings.

In detailing the reasons Republicans say they have to impeach Biden, Gerhardt concluded: “If that’s what exists, as a basis for this inquiry, it is not sufficient. I say that with all respect.”

While Democrats have floated the conspiracy that Trump is pushing the impeachment for his own selfish reasons, Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., has his own theory. According to Gaetz, Speaker Kevin McCarthy organized the hearing to blunt the criticism against him for how he’s caving to Democrats’ demands on federal spending.

“I don’t believe we’re endeavoring upon a legitimate impeachment of Joe Biden,” Gaetz told political kingmaker Steve Bannon on Tuesday.

“Kevin McCarthy didn’t even have enough votes to launch an impeachment inquiry, and you’re telling me he’s somehow going to get the votes for impeachment? I think McCarthy is using the specter of impeachment to subjugate the threat to his power as an impeachment impediment,” he said.

“The game you’re watching is not really the game being played,” he added.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.