Biden Suggests He Wouldn’t Be Running For Reelection If Trump Wasn’t Also Running

(Headline USA) President Joe Biden reportedly told a group of Democratic donors on Tuesday that he would not be running for reelection if it weren’t for former President Donald Trump.

“If Trump wasn’t running, I’m not sure I’d be running,” the 81-year-old said. “But we cannot let him win.”

The comment from Biden comes as concerns grow within the Democratic Party about his age and low poll numbers ahead of the 2024 election.

Several recent polls have found Biden losing to Trump in key swing states as a majority of voters admit Biden’s mental acuity is a primary concern of theirs. The RealClearPolitics average of recent national polls shows Trump with 46.7% national support compared to Biden at 44.7%.

Biden has also privately admitted that he often feels “tired,” according to author Franklin Foer.

And although Biden has insisted over the past two years that he would run for reelection, some Democrats have been quick to remind him that he signaled during the 2020 campaign that he would only serve one term if elected.

“If Biden is elected, he’s going to be 82 years old in four years and he won’t be running for reelection,” an adviser to the Biden campaign said at the time. “He’s going into this thinking, ‘I want to find a running mate I can turn things over to after four years, but if that’s not possible or doesn’t happen then I’ll run for reelection.’”

The problem for Biden now is that his running mate, Vice President Kamala Harris, is even more unpopular than he is.

The weakness of the Biden–Harris ticket led Trump to predict this week that Democrats will end up nominating someone else to head their ticket before the 2024 deadline.

“I personally don’t think he makes it,” Trump said during a Fox News townhall on Tuesday. “I watched him at the beach. He wasn’t able to lift a beach chair which is meant for children to lift … and mentally I would say he’s possibly equally as bad and maybe worse.”

Sen. Mike Lee Slams Wray’s ‘Disgraceful’ Abuse of Domestic-Surveillance Law

() Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, blasted FBI Director Christopher Wray during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Tuesday over the agency’s spying on Americans without a warrant.

The agency has been under fire since news broke that the FBI used the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Section 702 to spy on hundreds of thousands of American citizens without a warrant.

The FISA law was intended to allow federal surveillance to monitor foreign residents’ communications within the U.S. but has since been expanded much more.

“You have a lot of gall sir,” Lee told Wray at the hearing. “This is disgraceful. The Fourth Amendment requires more than that and you know it.”

Lee’s comments come after Wray admitted during the hearing that the FBI had also ignored the requirement to obtain court orders to monitor Americans even though they are legally obligated to do so in some circumstances.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence declassified FISA Court opinions in 2021 showing a pattern of the FBI monitoring American citizens without the proper legal authority. ODNI reported there were hundreds of thousands of improper searches of the FBI database, which includes Americans’ communications, in recent years by the FBI with no reasonable expectation of a crime committed or real intelligence to gather.

“Would abuse of Section 702 by an FBI employee, would that be something that would warrant the revocation of security clearance?” Lee asked Wray at the hearing, referring to FBI employees who used the agency’s search for personal reasons.

Wray agreed that abuse could possibly qualify for discipline but that he may not agree what constitutes an abuse of the program.

Lee also asked Wray about searches conducted by the agency on political figures and even a judge who had complained about the FBI.

Wray pointed to new measures the agency has put in place to prevent abuses, but Lee pushed back, pointing out that lawmakers have not been able to see the details of those changes.

“I’ve been on this committee for 13 years,” Lee said. “During the entirety of those 13 years I’ve expressed concerns to FBI Directors appointed by presidents of both political parties and three different presidential administrations. Every darn one of them has told me the same thing: ‘Don’t worry about it. We’ve got new procedures. It’s going to be different now.’”

In reality, the corrupted law-enforcement agency has become a master of stonewalling those responsible of providing oversight, Lee noted.

“It’s never different,” Lee said.

“You haven’t changed, and you keep referring to these policies, these new procedures. We haven’t seen that,” he continued. “We’re not even allowed to have access to it, and we have absolutely no reason to trust you because you haven’t behaved in a manner that’s trustworthy.”

Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., sent a letter to the FBI in August on this issue blasting the agency and calling for accountability.

Notably, the 702 provision expires at the end of this year unless Congress reauthorizes it. Wray has offered options to make changes to improve the program, but Scott shared Lee’s sentiment, saying those changes were broad and lacked details or a sense of substantial reform.

“In the face of these rampant abuses, it was disappointing that you are lobbying Congress to renew the Section 702 authorities without substantial reforms, and without public disclosure of accountability,” the letter said.

“If you agree with me that the hundreds of thousands of unlawful, warrantless searches of U.S. citizen information your agency has conducted under Section 702 are entirely unacceptable, to attempt to regain the American public’s trust, please explain the accountability for those rogue agents who conducted those illegal queries,” it added.

MAGA Rejoices over Retirement of ‘RINO’ McCarthy Ally Patrick McHenry

() Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., said Tuesday that he will not seek reelection, prompting a wave of celebration from his critics on the Right who were leery of the longtime lawmaker after he was foisted by happenstance into the public eye this year.

“I will be retiring from Congress at the end of my current term,” McHenry said.

“This is not a decision I came to lightly, but I believe there is a season for everything and— for me—this season has come to an end,” he added. “I look forward to what the next season brings for my family and me.”

For three weeks in October following the ouster of Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., McHenry led the chamber in the interim.

During that time, he said he was focused on getting the next speaker and did not want the position himself.

Nonetheless, rumors flew of an Establishment-backed campaign to block preferred speaker picks, including Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, with the end outcome being to secure the role permanently for McHenry, with or without a formal consensus.

As a result, he became the target of ire for some, who had hoped the Trump-endorsed Jordan could help lay the stage for an America First agenda in Congress ahead of the 2024 election.

Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., was elected speaker by his colleagues Oct. 25, making moot many of the concerns and objections on the Right.

Still, some criticized McHenry—the chief deputy GOP whip and chair of the Financial Services Committee—for some of the other things he had done to undermine conservative values, most notably his capitulation to Democrats during federal spending negotiations.

McHenry, known in part for his dapper attire inclusive of bow ties, is expected to finish his term. The 48-year-old has held a seat on the Financial Services Committee since his election in November 2004 at the age of 29.

His rise through the ranks included 2015 selection as the chief deputy whip to Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La. He has never voted for a tax increase.

“There has been a great deal of handwringing and ink spilled about the future of this institution because some—like me—have decided to leave,” McHenry said.

“Those concerns are exaggerated,” he continued. “I’ve seen a lot of change over 20 years. I truly feel this institution is on the verge of the next great turn.”

Pointing to several of the wave elections—from the Watergate-era backlash that brought Democrats into power, to Newt Gingrich’s 1994 “Contract with America” to the 2010 midterm where Republicans handed then-President Barack Obama a “shellacking”—he noted that the inter-party politics often mirrored the tumultuous external changes in the public mood.

“Evolutions are often lumpy and disjointed, but at each stage, new leaders emerge,” McHenry said.

“There are many smart and capable members who remain, and others are on their way,” he added. “I’m confident the House is in good hands.”

McHenry has been serving an area from the suburbs of Charlotte on Lake Norman to Pisgah National Forest in Burke County.

The first 24 hours of North Carolina’s filing deadline became as much about who was not running as who was, with McHenry one among many high-profile retiring legislators at both the state and federal levels.

The filing period opened Monday at noon across the state, where 14 seats in Congress will be on the ballot along with all 10 Council of State offices and the 170 seats of the state General Assembly.

Hours before it started, Sen. Joyce Krawiec, R-Forsyth, was the first notable lawmaker saying no to reelection.

Republican Pat Harrigan’s choice to now run in the 10th District—where McHenry would have—opens the door for North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore to be unchallenged in the Super Tuesday primary if he announces a run in the 14th District. Through Monday, Harrigan had been campaigning in the 14th.

Krawiec’s decision not to run is notable because of her ties to Medicaid expansion, an issue her party long fought. The decision was reached in March, provided a state budget was enacted, and that happened in September. The official expansion was Friday.

Krawiec, who said she will finish her term, was also a significant part of Republicans’ push in 2018 to implement voter ID. A ballot referendum easily passed, with 55.5% of more than 3.6 million voters saying yes.

Another notable state lawmaker not running will be Rep. Rosa Gill, D-Wake. She filled a vacancy in 2009 and has been reelected each term since. She told a local radio station, “I’ve served long enough.”

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

Dem. Rep. Gets Owned by Riley Gaines, Tries to Get It Struck from Record

() Wherever women’s sports activist Riley Gaines goes, fireworks are sure to follow.

The highlight of Tuesday’s Congressional hearing was an exchange between Gaines and Rep. Summer Lee, D-Pa., who in her opening remarks had accused those who disagreed with her at the hearing of being transphobic.

“Ranking Member Lee, if my testimony makes me transphobic, then I believe your opening monologue makes you a misogynist,” Gaines shot back in her opening remarks.

Rather than take the point gracefully that there might be two equal and opposing perspectives with conflicting interests in the debate, Lee then proceeded to interrupt the opening statement of Heritage Foundation legal scholar Sarah Perry in order to pursue a “point of order” against Gaines.

“Madame Chair, uh, excuse me, I move to have the gentlewoman’s words taken down,” Lee said in the middle of Perry’s statement without being formally recognized.

The committee briefly suspended, at which time Lee accused Gaines of “engaging in personalities.” However, upon further discussion with congressional staffers, Lee withdrew her point of order, recognizing that it was a losing battle.

During the hearing, critics of the growth of transgender athletes in women’s sports raised questions of fairness, safety, and privacy for female athletes in college and earlier who have been forced to compete against biological males.

“By allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports, we are placing our daughters in danger every time they step onto the field,” said Rep. Lisa McClain, R-Mich., who chaired the hearing, pointing to the severe injuries suffered by some young women.

In some cases, those girls have had to share locker rooms, been injured by the transgender athlete, and lost out on the first-place finish to the biological male, who has a range of physical advantages from size to bone density to greater lung capacity and more.

Gaines, a former collegiate swimmer for the University of Kentucky, tied transgender athlete Lia Thomas at the NCAA championship and has since become an outspoken advocate for protecting women’s sports.

“Let me be perfectly clear,” she said at the hearing. “A school that knowingly allows a male athlete to take a spot on a women’s team or allows a male athlete to take the field in a women’s game is denying a female student athletic opportunity. And that is sex-based discrimination, and it violates Title IX…”

Gaines has called on female athletes to boycott the competition when a biological male is participating, but said coaches, families and more need to step up to help female athletes as well. She pointed to the serious, career-ending injuries biological males have caused for some female athletes.

Her testimony comes as a slew of new federal rules are emerging to force schools in particular to toe the line on liberal gender and sexuality ideology, such as transgender athletes, bathrooms and more, or risk losing their federal funding.

This push has been driven largely not by new laws out of Congress, but by new interpretations and regulations from federal agencies.

McClain blasted the Biden administration, saying it is “putting leftist policies ahead of women and girls.”

The new Biden administration push has broad application across schools, and not just for sports.

For instance, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced a new interpretation of Title IX, the law preventing discrimination on the basis of sex, redefining “sex” to mean gender identity and sexual orientation.

This major change directly impacts the federal program providing free and reduced lunches for poor students at school. That means schools that refuse to allow transgender students to use the bathroom of their choice, for instance, could lose funding for school lunches. This has already begun, sparking at least two schools to sue the Biden administration.

This issue has become even more polarizing after high-profile cases of girls being attacked or injured by transgender students. One father in Loudoun County, Virginia, was arrested while protesting at a school board meeting after his daughter was sexually assaulted in the bathroom by a biological male identifying as a girl.

The Department of Education has proposed two rules likely coming next year using the same redefinition of sex that will require schools to comply with the liberal understanding of gender and sexuality or risk losing billions in federal funding for things like Pell grants, FAFSA, other grants and more. Specifically, students identifying as female would be allowed to play with the girls team.

Those rules, which were expected to already be finalized and may be combined into a single rule, have been delayed because of the pushback and concerns raised with the federal agency. Once they are finalized, though, schools that refuse to comply with allowing a range of transgender and sexuality requests could lose their funding.

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

Speaker Johnson Blasted for Blurring Faces in Jan. 6 Footage

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) House Speaker Mike Johnson is claiming to have kept his promise to release thousands of hours of footage from the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol Hill protest-turned-riot.

However, Johnson is blurring out faces of many people in the footage.

“As you know, we have to blur some of the faces of persons who participated in the events of that day because we don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ,” Johnson said Tuesday during a press conference.

To MAGA supporters and others, this defeats the point of releasing the footage—which was to spot possible undercover informants and agent provocateurs in the crowd.

Jan. 6 defendant William Pope, who’s been calling for all the footage to be released at once, noted the flaws in Johnson’s reasoning.

“Johnson is flat out lying about concerns people might be charged if the footage isn’t blurred. Congress already gave all the unblurred video to the DOJ!” he said.

Along with concealing the identities of possible government assets, others have noted that the process of blurring out faces is extremely time-consuming and costly.

“That is a remarkably… ambitious … goal. To screen, edit, ‘blur,’ and post thousands of hours of video… in the matter of months,” CBS reporter Scott MacFarlane noted. “If we sat down right now .. just to watch 44,000 hours of video. Just to watch it. It would take five years to do so.”

To date, Johnson has released just over 90 hours of the 44,000 hours of total footage.

However, the limited  footage released outside the Justice Department’s channels has been revelatory.

For instance, footage obtained by Tucker Carlson showed that Jacob Chansley—also known as QAnon Shaman—peacefully strolling through the Capitol with a police escort—undermining the narrative that he was a violent insurrectionist.

More substantially, Blaze Media claims to have reviewed footage that contradicts sworn testimony that a Capitol Police Special Agent gave at the Oath Keepers’ sedition trial last year.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Senate Approves 100s of Military Promotions after Tuberville Relents

(Headline USA) The Senate in a single stroke Tuesday approved about 425 military promotions after Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., ended a monthslong blockade of nominations over his opposition to a controversial abortion policy put in place earlier this year by the Pentagon.

Tuberville had been under pressure from members of both sides of the political aisle to end his holds as senators complained about the toll it was taking on service members and their families, and on military readiness.

President Joe Biden called the Senate’s action long overdue and said the military confirmations should never have been held up.

“In the end, this was all pointless,” Biden sneered in a statement released by the White House.

“Senator Tuberville, and the Republicans who stood with him, needlessly hurt hundreds of servicemembers and military families and threatened our national security—all to push a partisan agenda,” he added. “I hope no one forgets what he did.”

Tuberville’s one-man blockade was in protest of public tax dollars being spent to cover the travel expenses needed to fly servicemembers seeking abortions out of states where those abortions may be legally prohibited.

It is one of many woke expenditures that the Biden administration has prioritized in place of actually addressing military needs such as the conditions of the barracks. A report earlier this year exposed the deplorable state of disrepair that many servicemembers were being subjected to.

Meanwhile, recruitment has plummeted to record lows as few are interested in putting their lives on the line in a military that embraces transgenderism, critical race theory, vaccine mandates and other radical aspects of the left-wing agenda.

Democrats will now be able to advance even more of Biden’s disgraceful military appointments, making the possibility of U.S. intervention in the Ukraine theater or another global war all the more likely.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer teed up the military confirmations for a vote just a few hours after Tuberville emerged from a closed-door lunch with fellow GOP senators and told reporters he’s “not going to hold the promotions of these people any longer.”

He said holds would continue, however, for about 11 of the highest-ranking military officers, those who would be promoted to what he described as the four-star level or above.

There were 451 military officers affected by the holds as of Nov. 27.

“Well, certainly we’re encouraged by the news,” Pentagon spokesman Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder said at a briefing Tuesday. “We continue to stay engaged with Senator Tuberville in the Senate directly, to urge that all holds on all our general flag officer nominations be lifted.”

Critics said that Tuberville’s tactics were a mistake because he was blocking the promotions of people who had nothing to do with the policy he opposed.

“Why are we punishing American heroes who have nothing to with the dispute?” said Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska.

“Remember, we are against the Biden abortion travel policy,” Sullivan added. “But why are we punishing people who have nothing to do with the dispute and if they get confirmed can’t fix it? No one has had an answer for that question because there is no answer.”

For months, many of the military officers directly impacted by Tuberville’s holds declined to speak out, for fear any comments would be seen as political. But as the pressures on their lives and the lives of the officers serving under them increased, they began to speak about how the uncertainty surrounding their next move was impacting not only them, but their children and spouses.

They talked about how some of their most talented junior officers were going to get out of the military because of the instability they saw around them, and they talked about how having to perform multiple roles because of so many vacancies was putting enormous additional stress on an already overworked military community.

The issue came to a head when U.S. Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Eric Smith suffered a heart attack in October, just two days after he’d talked about the stress of the holds at a military conference.

“We can’t continue to do this to these good families. Some of these groups that are all for these holds, they haven’t thought through the implication of the harm it’s doing to real American families,” said Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa.

In response to the holds, Democrats had vowed to take up a resolution that would allow the Senate to confirm groups of military nominees at once during the remainder of the congressional term, but Republicans worried that the change could erode the powers of the minority in the Senate.

Tuberville emerged from his meeting with GOP colleagues, saying “all of us are against a rule change in the Senate.”

He was adamant that “we did the right thing for the unborn and for our military” by fighting back against executive overreach. He expressed no regrets, but admitted “we didn’t get as much out of it as we wanted.”

“The only opportunity you got to get the people on the left up here to listen to you in the minority is to put a hold on something, and that’s what we did,” Tuberville said. “We didn’t get the win that we wanted. We’ve still got a bad policy.”

In the end, Schumer said Tuberville ended up failing to get anything he wanted and held it out as a warning to others who might attempt similar efforts in the future to undo policies they oppose.

“The senior senator from Alabama has nothing to show for his 10 months of delay. No law is changing in any way,” Schumer said.

Sen. Jack Reed, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said after the vote that the first thing he wanted to do was to apologize to the hundreds of officers whose promotions were stalled.

“We have to recognize in the future, we can never do this again,” Reed said.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Judge Denies Search for Records of Collusion Between FBI and New York Times

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Obama-appointed District Judge Beryl Howell has denied a motion to compel the FBI to search for communications with the New York Times about the raid of conservative journalist James O’Keefe’s home—ruling that the Project Veritas founder hasn’t proven that such records exist.

The issue stems from the FBI raiding O’Keefe’s home on Nov. 6, 2021, in relation to the supposed theft of Ashley Biden’s diary, which describes inappropriate sexual behavior by her father, President Joe Biden.

Within an hour of the raid, O’Keefe said he received a text message about the matter from a New York Times reporter. And within days, NYT published an article based on confidential records, including attorney-client communications, seized from O’Keefe’s home.

O’Keefe and others have surmised that the FBI leaked his records to NYT. And in April 2022, transparency group Judicial Watch sued the Justice Department on O’Keefe’s behalf for communications between the FBI and NYT.

But on Nov. 27, Judge Howell denied Judicial Watch’s motion to force the FBI to scour its offices for records of the communications.

Howell said that neither O’Keefe nor Judicial Watch have proven that the FBI leaked his records to NYT. Implausibly, the judge said that the records may have come from O’Keefe’s lawyers.

“Plaintiff’s premise that the FBI was the source for the NYT’s reporting ignores the more obvious, cited sources for the reported information, including a neighbor at the location targeted in the warrant, the founder of Project Veritas and lawyers for Project Veritas, and even information potentially relayed in response to the NYT’s inquiries by the [Southern District of New York’s U.S. Attorneys Office],” the judge said.

In a video, O’Keefe explained why the judge’s theory is bogus: His neighbors were only quoted as seeing the FBI outside his door, and he only spoke to the newspaper about his colleagues being raided days earlier—but that was before he was raided.

“It doesn’t seem like the neighbors would know the secret grand jury and search warrant information,” he said.

Nevertheless, Judge Howell has declined to make the FBI even search its archive of text messages for evidence of communications with NYT. Howell said the FBI acted in “good faith” in searching a few email archives and communications of top FBI officials that had nothing to do with the Ashley Biden investigation.

“How is any of this undertaken in good faith? The attorney general expressly prohibits the seizure of reporters’ notes. All of this is in bad faith, and likely illegal and unconstitutional in every conceivable way,” O’Keefe said in response to the judge’s contention.

O’Keefe, who left Project Veritas this year and now runs O’Keefe Media Group, said the judge’s decision shows why his undercover journalism is so crucial.

“That’s why we do what we do,” he said.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

FBI Boss Admits Hunter’s Laptop Kept Secret Because of Election

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) FBI Director Christopher Wray attempted to shed light on why the bureau refrained from confirming that the Hunter Biden laptop controversy wasn’t linked to a Russian disinformation campaign. 

Wray claimed that the FBI could not intervene during the intense censorship surrounding the New York Post’s revelations about the Biden family, citing the proximity of the bombshell to the 2020 presidential election.

His claim, however, contradicts damning allegations brought forward by Republicans that the FBI played an active role in leading the censorship of the bombshell, despite knowing it was real.

“We have to be very careful about what we can say, especially in the middle of an election season,” Wray told Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., in response to questions about why the FBI didn’t notify major tech platforms to not curb the laptop’s spread.

Wray’s allegations directly contradict findings from the House Judiciary Committee that accuse an FBI agent of lying about the bureau’s role in the suppressing of the damning report.

During that period, social media giants blocked the dissemination of this laptop story, falsely labeling them as part of Russian disinformation. 

The NY Post unveiled that then-presidential candidate Joe Biden knew about Hunter Biden’s shady foreign business dealings, directly contradicting Biden’s claims of no-knowledge of his son’s business affairs. 

Platforms like Twitter went as far as blocking the NY Post’s account and limiting article circulation, impeding the report’s reach. 

Citing these facts, Kennedy inquired, “Why didn’t the FBI just say, ‘Hey, the laptop is real’? Why didn’t you just tell everybody, ‘The laptop’s real—we can’t vouch for what’s on it, but it’s real. This isn’t a fiction’?” 

Wray defended the FBI, citing concerns about influencing the election by making public statements during such a critical period. 

“The FBI cannot, especially in a time like that, be talking about an ongoing investigation,” asserted the FBI director, attempting to dispel claims that FBI agents instructed Twitter to suppress the laptop exposé. 

Kennedy interjected wryly, “But others were in government,” contending that the FBI should have intervened to refute unfounded accusations of Russian involvement. 

The Republican senator added, “You see all this controversy going on. Why didn’t the FBI say: ‘Time out, folks—we’re not getting in the middle of this but the laptop’s real again.’” 

While the FBI didn’t authenticate the laptop, it played a pivotal role in a controversial letter signed by 51 self-proclaimed intelligence officers, baselessly asserting the laptop’s ties to a Russian disinformation campaign. 

In the letter, the officials cited “media reports” that the “FBI has now opened an investigation in this case.” 

The laptop’s revelations served as a precursor to damning allegations of bribery, political corruption, and an alleged influence peddling scheme, all central to the impeachment inquiry into Biden.

Brazen Illegals Admit They Don’t Need Asylum, Thank Biden and Shrug

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) A series of viral videos have provided disconcerting insight into the border chaos confronting immigration authorities at the southern border, with one undocumented immigrant unabashedly expressing gratitude toward President Joe Biden. 

In three videos shared by Fox News border correspondent Bill Melugin, one unidentified immigrant articulated reasons for crossing the southern border, while others expressed appreciation towards the embattled president, presumably for his perceived leniency on immigration.

“I love you, Joe Biden—thank you for everything, Joe Biden!” exclaimed an unidentified Moroccan national in an interview with Melugin. Just last month, a caravan of illegal aliens heading to the U.S. were captured chanting, “Biden! Biden! Biden!” 

Another man, of Liberian nationality, added to the dialogue, admitting that he crossed the border illegally to seek employment. “I came here because I want quality of life [sic],” said the Liberian man, adding, “America is the land of opportunity.”

The man’s confession stands in stark contrast to the prevalent assertions from Democrats that those crossing the border unlawfully are primarily seeking political refuge. 

Notably, a third video captured by the Fox reporter showed what appeared to be a human smuggler assisting illegal immigrants in crossing a broken part of the border fence. 

The apparent smuggler was seen recording the immigrants crossing the border, presumably to provide evidence of their arrival for those involved or other points of contact at the southern border.

Upon realizing he was being recorded, the individual, who had covered his face with a ski mask, offered a military salute and nonchalantly shrugged at the camera.

The emergence of this video occurred less than 24 hours after conservative critics raised concerns about what they described as the influx of “military-aged” males at the southern border. 

One video, recorded by NewsNation reporter Jorge Ventura, depicted over a dozen individuals described as Chinese nationals being processed by border authorities. 

A week earlier, the New York Times reported that over 24,000 Chinese nationals had been apprehended at the southern border, exceeding the total number of illegal immigrants from China in the past decade combined. 

Those who have received final deportation orders are unable to return to their home country due to the Chinese communist government’s refusal to repatriate them.

Man Presumed Dead in Mysterious House Explosion in Va. Suburbs Had Troubled Past

(Headline USA) The owner of a Virginia house that exploded as police tried to execute a search warrant is believed to have died in the blast, officials said Tuesday, as details emerged about numerous grievances he expressed against neighbors and others on social media and in lawsuits.

James Yoo, 56, was identified by Arlington County Police Chief Andy Penn at a news conference as the person whose actions brought police to the Arlington home after he fired a “flare-type gun” from inside the house into the neighborhood more than 30 times.

Penn said police responded to the house about 4:45 p.m. Monday after receiving reports of shots fired. When attempts to communicate with Yoo were largely unsuccessful, police obtained a search warrant.

As officers breached the door to enter the home, the suspect fired multiple gunshots from within the house, Penn said. He said it wasn’t clear where in the house the shots were coming from or what the suspect was firing at.

Soon after that, just before 8:30 p.m., the house exploded, shooting flames and debris into the air in a blast that was felt for miles.

An investigation into the cause of the explosion is ongoing, fire officials said. Police asked that anyone with photos or video of the area share them with investigators.

Assistant Fire Chief Jason Jenkins said authorities turned off gas service to the home and evacuated nearby residents—including people who lived in the other part of the duplex—about 90 minutes before the explosion.

“I’m not going to speculate on cause or origin,” he said of the blast.

“The fire department personnel absolutely saved lives” by evacuating residents of the neighborhood, Jenkins said.

Investigators have not yet identified human remains found inside the home, but “all factors point to that it’s this individual [Yoo],” Penn said.

Yoo publicly aired grievances against multiple people in his life. On LinkedIn, he recently posted paranoid rants about his neighbors and a former co-worker.

He also filed federal lawsuits that were dismissed as frivolous against his ex-wife, younger sister, a moving company and the New York Supreme Court.

Each of four lawsuits filed between 2018 and 2022 case was dismissed, and some were described by judges as “convoluted” or “confused.”

In 2018, Yoo filed a 163-page federal lawsuit in New York against his then-wife, younger sister and a hospital after he said he was committed against his will. Yoo alleged conspiracy and deprivation of his rights, among other crimes.

The sprawling complaint included biographical details, such as who was at his wedding, and also wove in facts about who was president of the United States at the time. Yoo described how his then-wife drove him to Rochester General Hospital in November 2015 “against his will.”

Yoo denied having any thoughts of suicide or prior depression. He cited hospital records that reference a suicide note that he left for his wife, which he said he never wrote.

A man who identified himself on the phone as the husband of Yoo’s ex-wife said she had no comment. Yoo’s sister did not respond to an email or LinkedIn message requesting comment.

In his lawsuits, Yoo referenced many attempts to contact the FBI. He wrote that he believed that a New York Times reporter he saw on television was someone who had claimed to be an FBI agent and came to his house in 2017.

He said the person warned him against further attempts to communicate with a U.S. attorney in western New York or he would face a harassment charge.

David Sundberg, assistant director of the FBI’s Washington field office, said Yoo had communicated with the FBI with phone calls, letters and online tips “over a number of years.”

“I would characterize these communications as primarily complaints about alleged frauds he believed were perpetrated against him,” Sundberg said. “The information contained therein and the nature of those communications did not lead to opening any FBI investigations.”

On Tuesday, officers wearing Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives jackets combed a nearby street looking through papers scattered in the debris field. Junk mail carrying Yoo’s name and the address of the home that exploded was visible on the street.

Craig Kailimai, special agent in charge of the Washington field division for the ATF, said investigators were conducting a “grid search” of the home to determine the cause and origin of the explosion.

The White House was monitoring developments in the case, a spokeswoman said.

“Our thoughts are with the police officers that were injured in that explosion,” Olivia Dalton, the White House principal deputy press secretary, told reporters on Air Force One on Tuesday.

Carla Rodriguez of South Arlington said she could hear the explosion more than 2 miles away and came to the scene, but police kept onlookers blocks away.

“I actually thought a plane exploded,” she said.

Bob Maynes thought maybe a tree had fallen on his house when he heard the explosion.

“I was sitting in my living room watching television and the whole house shook,” Maynes said.

Arlington is located across the Potomac River from Washington, D.C. The explosion occurred in Bluemont, a neighborhood in north Arlington where many of the homes are duplexes.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press