Quantcast

Federal ‘COVID’ Spending Just Hit $41,870 Per Taxpayer

For the same $6 trillion in expenditure, the government could have given every federal taxpayer a $41,870 check...

(Brad Polumbo, Foundation for Economic Education) President Joe Biden just signed his sweeping $1.9 trillion spending package into law. Once this bill hits the books, total taxpayer expenditure on (ostensibly) COVID relief will hit $6 trillion—which, roughly estimated, comes out to $41,870 in spending per federal taxpayer.

Did you see anywhere near that much in benefit?

The sheer immensity of this spending is hard to grasp. For context, $6 trillion is more than one-fourth of what the US economy produces in an entire year, according to Fox Business. The COVID spending blowout is at least eight times bigger than the (inflation-adjusted) price tag of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s “New Deal.”

Moreover, the COVID spending bills have all lost huge sums of money to unrelated carve-outs, politician pet projects, corporate bailouts, fraud, waste, and worse.

...article continued below
- Advertisement -

In the latest $1.9 trillion package, more than 90 percent of the spending is not directly related to containing COVID-19. Only 1 percent of the money, about $15 to $20 billion, is spent on vaccines. Meanwhile, hundreds of billions go to bailing out poorly managed state governments’ budget holes that predate the pandemic and $86 billion rescues failing pension plans. Meanwhile, billions more go to Obamacare expansion and subsidizing public schools long after the pandemic.

And that’s just scratching the surface.

The numbers here really are quite damning.

For the same $6 trillion in expenditure, the government could have given every federal taxpayer a $41,870 check. Or, to think about it a bit differently, it could have written every American roughly an $18,181 check.

...article continued below
- Advertisement -

Let’s compare this to what most Americans actually received.

Only someone who fully collected expanded unemployment benefits throughout the pandemic and received all $3,200 in total of the stimulus payments likely received more than $18,181 in direct benefit from this spending package. And that’s a relatively small fraction of the public.

Because of the way the government used outdated (and arbitrary) income data to determine eligibility, many more taxpayers saw nothing or little in exchange for their $41,870 share of the cost, perhaps just the initial $1,200 stimulus or none at all. (Meanwhile, billions in checks went to dead people).

So, for almost all Americans, the actual benefits of the multiple pieces of lengthy stimulus legislation come in far, far below the figure that they would have received if the entire pile of money was just even split up and sent out.

How can that possibly be considered a success? In fact, it’s actually a net negative.

Too often, the stimulus conversation is simply framed around whether we should give money to a certain group of people or program—rather than also including the trade-offs and costs.

The question isn’t just: Should we send people $1,400 “stimulus” checks? It is, instead: Should we send people $1,400 stimulus checks at the cost of taking the equivalent amount (or more if you factor in waste) from other people? It’s not just whether we should send $350 billion to state and local governments—but should we do so at the cost of taking an average of $2,442 per federal taxpayer?

Money doesn’t grow on trees. Or, as the great economist Ludwig von Mises put it, the government “does not have the powers of the mythical Santa Claus.”

“The truth is the government cannot give if it does not take from somebody,” Mises wrote in Bureaucracy. “They cannot spend except by taking out of the pockets of some people for the benefit of others.”

The government cannot create wealth out of thin air. It can only give anyone anything via three ways:

  • Directly increasing taxes, which discourages economic growth and directly takes money away from people
  • Running up debt, which means much higher taxes in the future plus interest, creating a drag on economic growth
  • Printing money, which “stealth taxes” the public via inflation

There’s no such thing as a free lunch, and, much to the chagrin of spend-happy politicians’, Santa Claus is not real. Government spending doesn’t create wealth; it only transfers wealth, generally destroying a lot of it in the process.

So, unless Americans are actually seeing equal or greater benefit from spending compared to its cost, it’s a raw deal for taxpayers. And for the federal government’s “COVID” spending binge, it’s not even close.

Don’t believe me? Well, did you see $41,870 in benefit from these programs? Or even $18,181?

For almost everyone, the honest answer is no…Original Source

- Advertisement -

TRENDING NOW

Mississippi’s GOP Leaders Fight for Pro-Life Law at Supreme Court

(Headline USA) Mississippi Agriculture Commissioner Andy Gipson is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold abortion restrictions that he helped put into state law. Gipson...

Texas Democrats Cry Racism as GOP Draws New Congressional Maps

(Headline USA) Texas Republicans on Saturday night closed in on redrawn U.S. House maps following the results from the 2020 census. In a key late-night...

Cities Use Federal ‘COVID’ Money to Pad General Fund & Finish Luxury Projects

(Headline USA) At the Loma Verde Recreation Center south of San Diego, demolition work is underway on a $24 million project that will rebuild...

Biden Claims ‘Democracy Survived’ 1/6 Uprising, Credits Police State

(Headline USA) While many would beg to differ, President Joe Biden claimed on Saturday that American democracy was alive and well during a tribute...

Pelosi Demands More Cheerleading from Media

The hard-left mainstream media has made it shamelessly clear it has no problem carrying the water to advance Democrats’ radical agendas. But the cheerleading needs...

University Offers to Rehire Prof Acquitted of Ties to China

(Associated Press) The University of Tennessee at Knoxville has offered to reinstate a professor who was acquitted of federal charges that had accused him...

COMPLAINT: Psaki Broke Ethics Rule by Plugging Va. Candidate for Gov.

For Virginia's Democrat gubernatorial candidate, Terry McAuliffe, things have come full circle. The one-time Clinton bundler was the subject of a litany of ethical complaints...

MURDOCK: Racist Social Agenda Buried in Dems’ So-Called Budget Bill

(Deroy Murdock, Headline USA) President Joe Biden’s Build Back Better Act should be rechristened the Build Bigotry Better Act and then buried in a...

Rogan Gets CNN Pundit to Admit Network Lied About Ivermectin

Popular podcast host Joe Rogan forced CNN’s chief medical correspondent, Sanjay Gupta, to admit that the network falsely claimed Rogan took “horse dewormer” as...
- Advertisement -