Quantcast

Federal ‘COVID’ Spending Just Hit $41,870 Per Taxpayer

For the same $6 trillion in expenditure, the government could have given every federal taxpayer a $41,870 check...

(Brad Polumbo, Foundation for Economic Education) President Joe Biden just signed his sweeping $1.9 trillion spending package into law. Once this bill hits the books, total taxpayer expenditure on (ostensibly) COVID relief will hit $6 trillion—which, roughly estimated, comes out to $41,870 in spending per federal taxpayer.

Did you see anywhere near that much in benefit?

The sheer immensity of this spending is hard to grasp. For context, $6 trillion is more than one-fourth of what the US economy produces in an entire year, according to Fox Business. The COVID spending blowout is at least eight times bigger than the (inflation-adjusted) price tag of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s “New Deal.”

Moreover, the COVID spending bills have all lost huge sums of money to unrelated carve-outs, politician pet projects, corporate bailouts, fraud, waste, and worse.

...article continued below
- Advertisement -

In the latest $1.9 trillion package, more than 90 percent of the spending is not directly related to containing COVID-19. Only 1 percent of the money, about $15 to $20 billion, is spent on vaccines. Meanwhile, hundreds of billions go to bailing out poorly managed state governments’ budget holes that predate the pandemic and $86 billion rescues failing pension plans. Meanwhile, billions more go to Obamacare expansion and subsidizing public schools long after the pandemic.

And that’s just scratching the surface.

The numbers here really are quite damning.

For the same $6 trillion in expenditure, the government could have given every federal taxpayer a $41,870 check. Or, to think about it a bit differently, it could have written every American roughly an $18,181 check.

...article continued below
- Advertisement -

Let’s compare this to what most Americans actually received.

Only someone who fully collected expanded unemployment benefits throughout the pandemic and received all $3,200 in total of the stimulus payments likely received more than $18,181 in direct benefit from this spending package. And that’s a relatively small fraction of the public.

Because of the way the government used outdated (and arbitrary) income data to determine eligibility, many more taxpayers saw nothing or little in exchange for their $41,870 share of the cost, perhaps just the initial $1,200 stimulus or none at all. (Meanwhile, billions in checks went to dead people).

So, for almost all Americans, the actual benefits of the multiple pieces of lengthy stimulus legislation come in far, far below the figure that they would have received if the entire pile of money was just even split up and sent out.

How can that possibly be considered a success? In fact, it’s actually a net negative.

Too often, the stimulus conversation is simply framed around whether we should give money to a certain group of people or program—rather than also including the trade-offs and costs.

The question isn’t just: Should we send people $1,400 “stimulus” checks? It is, instead: Should we send people $1,400 stimulus checks at the cost of taking the equivalent amount (or more if you factor in waste) from other people? It’s not just whether we should send $350 billion to state and local governments—but should we do so at the cost of taking an average of $2,442 per federal taxpayer?

Money doesn’t grow on trees. Or, as the great economist Ludwig von Mises put it, the government “does not have the powers of the mythical Santa Claus.”

“The truth is the government cannot give if it does not take from somebody,” Mises wrote in Bureaucracy. “They cannot spend except by taking out of the pockets of some people for the benefit of others.”

The government cannot create wealth out of thin air. It can only give anyone anything via three ways:

  • Directly increasing taxes, which discourages economic growth and directly takes money away from people
  • Running up debt, which means much higher taxes in the future plus interest, creating a drag on economic growth
  • Printing money, which “stealth taxes” the public via inflation

There’s no such thing as a free lunch, and, much to the chagrin of spend-happy politicians’, Santa Claus is not real. Government spending doesn’t create wealth; it only transfers wealth, generally destroying a lot of it in the process.

So, unless Americans are actually seeing equal or greater benefit from spending compared to its cost, it’s a raw deal for taxpayers. And for the federal government’s “COVID” spending binge, it’s not even close.

Don’t believe me? Well, did you see $41,870 in benefit from these programs? Or even $18,181?

For almost everyone, the honest answer is no…Original Source

Copyright 2022. No part of this site may be reproduced in whole or in part in any manner without the permission of the copyright owner. To inquire about licensing content, use the contact form at https://headlineusa.com/advertising.
- Advertisement -

TRENDING NOW

Trump Dismisses Rumors of DeSantis Feud: ‘We Have Very Good Relationship’

(Headline USA)  Former President Donald Trump dismissed reports about a growing feud between himself and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, saying that he has a...

Tom Hanks Narrates Cheerleading Video Peddling Biden’s First Year

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) In an attempt to reign in public opinion, the Biden Inaugural Committee recruited actor Tom Hanks to narrate a video...

Trump Slams Georgia DA’s Lawfare Attack on Election Challenges

(Headline USA) A Georgia prosecutor is targeting former President Donald Trump in the Left's latest effort to punish him for valid challenges of the...

Jury Selection Proceeds for Avenatti–Stormy Daniels Trial

(Headline USA) Michael Avenatti, the once high-profile California attorney who regularly taunted then-President Donald Trump during frequent television appearances on leftist media looking for...

9th Circuit Rules Calif. Violated 2nd Amendment By Closing Gun Stores

(Headline USA)  The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled this week that two California counties violated the Second Amendment by forcibly shutting down...

As Biden Seeks COVID Reboot, Even Ivermectin Gets Second Look

(Tony Sifert, Headline USA) "Sensing political calamity" in 2022, the Biden administration and its supporters in the media and health establishment are making an...

‘Dilbert’ Creator Encourages Kids to Organize Mask-Mandate Revolt

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Scott Adams, creator of the comic strip "Dilbert," has encouraged kids to organize a protest against mask mandates via Twitter. Masks...

GETTR CEO Admits Platform Does Not Support Free Speech

(Joshua Paladino, Headline USA) Gettr CEO Jason Miller said on a YouTube livestream this week that his social media platform does not protect political speech...

Trump Pays Tribute to Iconic Rocker Meat Loaf

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Iconic musician and actor Meat Loaf has passed away at the age of 74. "Our hearts are broken to announce that...
- Advertisement -