House Dems Discuss Upping Legal Gun Age to 3 Yrs Beyond Draft, Voting Ages

'It really is time for our Republican colleagues to put up or shut up...'

(Headline USA) House Democrats were beginning to put their stamp on overreaching but long-coveted gun-control legislation, taking advantage of mass shootings in Texas and New York by 18-year-old assailants.

The House Judiciary Committee was set to hold a hearing Thursday to advance legislation that would raise the age limit for purchasing a semi-automatic centerfire rifle from 18 to 21.

If passed by Democrats, who control both chambers of Congress and the White House, the measure would effectively deny 2nd Amendment rights to legal adults, even three years after they would be eligible to be conscripted by a draft and are eligible to vote in US elections.

The bill also would make it a federal offense to import, manufacture or possess large-capacity magazines and would create a grant program to buy back such magazines.

...article continued below
- Advertisement -

It further builds on the executive branch’s ban on bump-stock devices and so-called ghost guns that are privately made without serial numbers.

The Democratic legislation, called the Protecting Our Kids Act, was quickly added to the legislative docket after last week’s school shooting in Uvalde, Texas. A vote by the full House could come as early as next week.

With Republicans nearly in lockstep in their opposition, the House action will mostly be symbolic, serving to put lawmakers on record about constitutionally protected gun rights ahead of this year’s elections.

Republicans are currently expected to prevail in the midterms with a possible red wave that could retake both chambers of Congress after two years of Democrat mismanagement and overreach that have led to unprecedented economic turmoil within the lifetimes of most Americans.

...article continued below
- Advertisement -

The evenly-split Senate was taking a different course, with a bipartisan group striving toward a compromise on gun safety legislation that might win enough GOP support to become law.

But Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York, the Democratic chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, claimed the more radical proposals were popular with Americans.

“You say that it is too soon to take action? That we are ‘politicizing’ these tragedies to enact new policies?” Nadler said in prepared remarks for Thursday’s hearing obtained by The Associated Press.

He then listed off the litany of attacks since the Bill Clinton administration.

“It has been 23 years since Columbine,” he said. “Fifteen years since Virginia Tech. Ten years since Sandy Hook. Seven years since Charleston. Four years since Parkland and Santa Fe and Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh.”

He added: “Too soon? My friends, what the hell are you waiting for?”

But critics noted that existing gun laws failed to prevent many mass shootings from happening, including those in deep-blue states like New York and California. And violent crimes appeared to be running rampant in cities like Chicago, where only law-abiding citizens were reliqunishing their right to self-defense.

Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, the ranking Republican on the committee, told Fox News he’ll press his GOP colleagues to oppose the bill.

“I’m going to do everything I can to encourage my colleagues to oppose this … hodgepodge of bills that I don’t think would have made one difference in tragedies that we’ve seen recently,” Jordan said.

Any legislative response to the Uvalde and Buffalo, New York, shootings will have to win support from at least 10 Senate Republicans in order to advance the measure to a final vote.

Ideas under discussion include expanded background checks for gun purchases and incentivizing red-flag laws that allow family members, school officials and others to go into court and secure an order requiring the police to seize guns from people considered a threat to themselves or others.

The broader bipartisan group of almost 10 senators met again Wednesday—“a very productive call,” said far-left Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., in an interview.

“There’s a tenor and tone, as well as real substantive discussion that seems different,” he said.

Blumenthal has been working with a Republican member of the group, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, on a proposal to send resources to the states for red-flag laws. He said he was “excited and encouraged” by the response from the group.

“It really is time for our Republican colleagues to put up or shut up,” Blumenthal said. “We’ve been down this road before.”

President Joe Biden was asked Wednesday if he was confident Congress would take action on gun legislation.

“I served in Congress for 36 years. I’m never confident, totally,” Biden said. “It depends, and I don’t know. I’ve not been in on the negotiations as they’re going on right now.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Copyright 2022. No part of this site may be reproduced in whole or in part in any manner without the permission of the copyright owner. To inquire about licensing content, use the contact form at https://headlineusa.com/advertising.
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -