(Headline USA) The accounting firm that prepared former President Donald Trump’s annual financial statements says the documents, used to secure lucrative loans and burnish Trump’s image as a wealthy businessman, “should no longer be relied upon” after New York’s attorney general claimed they regularly misstated the value of assets.
In a letter to the Trump Organization’s lawyer Feb. 9, Mazars USA LLP advised the company to inform anyone who had gotten the documents not to use them when assessing the financial health of the company and the ex-president. The firm also said it was cutting ties with Trump, its highest-profile client.
Mazars’ letter, made public in a court filing Monday, came just weeks after New York Attorney General Letitia James said her anti-Trump fishing expedition uncovered evidence that he and his company used “fraudulent or misleading” valuations of its golf clubs, skyscrapers and other properties to get loans and tax benefits.
“While we have not concluded that the various financial statements, as a whole, contain material discrepancies, based upon the totality of the circumstances, we believe our advice to you to no longer rely upon those financial statements is appropriate,” Mazars General Counsel William J. Kelly wrote to his Trump Organization counterpart, Alan Garten.
The politically ambitious James campaigned in 2018 on the promise of investigating then-President Trump and has been unrelenting in her devotion to the cause, expending limitless resources to dig up whatever dirt she can.
Democrats hope that the whif of a scandal might preclude him from running for president again in 2024, even as James herself is seeking election to be New York governor.
Kelly told Garten that Mazars could no longer work with Trump because of a conflict of interest and urged him to find another tax preparer.
Kelly said several Trump-related tax returns still needed to be finished, including those of the former president and first lady.
The Trump Organization said in a statement it was “disappointed that Mazars has chosen to part ways,” but took Kelly’s letter as a positive because the accounting firm hadn’t found material discrepancies in Trump’s financial statements.
The letter “confirms that after conducting a subsequent review of all prior statements of financial condition, Mazars’ work was performed in accordance with all applicable accounting standards and principles and that such statements of financial condition do not contain any material discrepancies,” the Trump Organization said. “This confirmation effectively renders the investigations by the DA and AG moot.”
Kelly said Mazars performed its work on Trump’s financial statements “in accordance with professional standards” but that it could no longer stand by the documents in light of James’s findings and its own investigation.
Kelly said Mazars’ conclusions applied to Trump’s 2011-2020 financial statements. Another firm handled Trump’s 2021 financial statement.
James’ office included a copy of Kelly’s letter in a court filing as she seeks to enforce a subpoena to have Trump and his two eldest children, Donald Jr. and Ivanka, testify under oath.
A state court judge, Arthur Engoron, is scheduled to hear arguments Thursday in the subpoena dispute.
James claimed Monday that, given the evidence, “there should be no doubt that this is a lawful investigation and that we have legitimate reason” for their dogged pursuit of the political rival.
Trump’s lawyers have argued that any testimony they give could be used against them in a parallel criminal investigation being overseen by the Manhattan district attorney’s office—a probe that led to tax fraud charges last year against the Trump Organization and Allen Weisselberg, its longtime chief financial officer, over a relatively trivial matter.
Weisselberg allegedly failed to report compensation that he had received in the way of school expenditures for his children, even though the organization had written them off.
Trump has given his Statement of Financial Condition—a yearly snapshot of his holdings—to banks to secure hundreds of millions of dollars worth of loans on properties such as a Wall Street office building and a Florida golf course, and to financial magazines to justify his place among the world’s billionaires.
In a court filing last month, James’ office detailed several instances in which Trump allegedly misstated the value of assets on financial statements given to banks.
Deutsche Bank accepted Trump’s financial statements without objection in a deal for $300 million in loans for three of his properties and, in internal memoranda, emphasized Trump’s reported financial strength as a factor in lending to him, James’ office said.
Another bank said it received financial statements in 2014 stating Trump had a net worth of $5.8 billion and liquidity of $302 million. A bank official involved in that deal told James’s office that if he were aware of misstatements on Trump’s statement of financial condition, he would have killed the deal.
However, litigation-averse banks may be quick in retrospect to deny their ties to Trump even though the vast majority of his value is tied to his long-established personal brand even more than his tangible assets. Although Trump had not announced his run for president at the time of the loan, he already was a well-known television personality.
James office said its investigation started after Trump’s former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, told Congress in 2019 that Trump had a history of misrepresenting the value of assets to gain favorable loan terms and tax benefits.
Cohen gave copies of three of Trump’s financial statements to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform. Cohen said Trump gave the statements to Deutsche Bank to inquire about a loan to buy the NFL’s Buffalo Bills and to Forbes magazine to substantiate his claim to a spot on its list of the world’s wealthiest people.
Cohen served time in federal prison after pleading guilty in 2018 to tax crimes, lying to Congress and campaign finance violations, some of which involved his role in orchestrating payments to two women to keep them from talking about alleged affairs with Trump.
Trump’s lawyers have portrayed Cohen as having a vendetta against Trump and said in a recent court filing that it “stretches all credibility to believe that” James’ office put “any legitimate stock” in his testimony.
James’ office responded Monday that not only did it rely on Cohen’s testimony, but that his testimony is “vindicated by the evidence obtained to date and Mazars’s notification that those statements should not be relied upon.”
Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press
