(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) A jury stacked with Hillary Clinton campaign donors ignored what most legal experts considered “overwhelming” evidence of guilt and returned an earlier-than-expected verdict that gave Democrat bagman Michael Sussmann a free pass on a charge of lying to the FBI.
Special counsel John Durham mounted a comprehensive case against Sussmann that showed through damning testimony and mountains of evidence that Sussmann lied to the FBI about his colluding with the Clinton 2016 presidential campaign to promote the now debunked Russia hoax fable.
“Unsurprising,” Mike Davis, former chief counsel for nominations, U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, tweeted after the verdict.
“The evidence made crystal clear Sussman (sic) was guilty as sin. But jury nullification by a biased DC jury. After a trial run by a biased DC judge.”
Unsurprising.
The evidence made crystal clear Sussman was guilty as sin.
But jury nullification by a biased DC jury.
After a trial run by a biased DC judge.
Shameful.
We have two systems of justice in America. https://t.co/v5GrRz1ZB1
— 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) May 31, 2022
While the pro-Clinton jury returned a verdict favorable to their ringleader, the trial might yet put a dent in the Clinton Cabal armor and is likely to help future prosecutions into the Original Deplorable‘s scheme
Former Attorney General William Barr said that Durham is in the process of uncovering “seditious” activity that would be the evidence of Clinton trying to undermine Donald Trump’s candidacy and presidency.
“The trial of Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann has shown how Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and its allies spread theories tying rival Donald Trump to Russia in the final months of the election, providing evidence for … a so-called Russiagate plot to undermine Trump’s candidacy and later his presidency,” according to The Washington Examiner.
Barr said that he became an attorney general because he believed that there will be a constitutional crisis. He took charge of the Justice Department in February of 2019 to oversee Robert Mueller’s “Trump-Russia findings” and appointed Durham to investigate the collusion between Russia and Trump that was called a “witch hunt” by Trump himself.
“I think whatever you think of Trump, the fact is that the whole Russiagate thing was a grave injustice,” Barr told BlazeTV.
“It appears to be a dirty political trick that was used first to hobble him and then potentially to drive him from office.”
He said that he also believes it was seditious, citing 18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy. However, he added that the court will determine the criminality, which it failed to do in spectacular fashion.
BREAKING: Donald J. Trump responds to Sussmann verdict. pic.twitter.com/egei24V9bX
— Election Wizard 🇺🇸 (@ElectionWiz) May 31, 2022
Aside from Sussmann, and a revelation of Robby Mook, the campaign manager for Clinton in 2016, who said that Clinton “personally signed off on sharing since-debunked Trump-Russia allegations related to Alfa-Bank with the media during the election,” there is also something else, according to Examiner.
Durham also has a case against a key source for Christopher Steele’s anti-Trump now-discredited dossier.
“Research for the now-discredited dossier was funded by the Democratic National Committee and Clinton’s 2016 campaign,” the Examiner reported. “The two were fined by the Federal Election Commission for not properly disclosing those expenditures.”
Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith also admitted to Durham that he altered an email about a Trump campaign aide under the government surveillance, the Examiner said.
Barr suggested that these allegations had worldwide consequences, including the current war between Russia and Ukraine.
“It was a gross injustice, and it hurt the United States in many ways, including what we’re seeing in Ukraine these days. It distorted our foreign policy, and so forth,” he said.
