Gaines’ Father Enters Tennessee Congressional Race

(Kim Jarrett, The Center Square) Riley Gaines‘ father is entering the political arena with a run for a Tennessee congressional seat.

Brad Gaines is seeking the Sixth District congressional seat, which is currently occupied by John Rose, who is running for governor.

Gaines will face four Republicans in the 2026 primary. Johnny Garrett is a current member of the Tennessee House. William Van Hilleary is a former U.S. congressman who served as Rose’s chief of staff. Ronnie Dale Braden is an Army veteran who has worked in multiple industries. Joe Reid is a Crossville businessman.

Gaines filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission earlier this week and has a one-page website. He touts his history as a football player in high school and at Vanderbilt University. The website does not list a platform.

Riley Gaines is a former University of Kentucky swimmer who competed in the 2022 NCAA Championships in Atlanta.

She lost the competition to a University of Pennsylvania swimmer who previously spent three years on the men’s team. Riley Gaines has lobbied for bills in several states that would prevent transgender females from competing in women’s sports.

Georgia lawmakers passed the Riley Gaines Act, which bars males and females from competing on teams designated for the opposite gender. It also requires restrooms and changing areas that can be used by more than one student to be limited to one gender.

One Democrat, Mike Croley, has filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission. Unaffiliated candidate Christopher Brian Monday has also filed.

Extended Secret Service Protection Canceled for Kamala Harris

(Sarah Roderick-Fitch, The Center Square) More than seven months after leaving office, President Donald Trump is revoking the taxpayer-funded Secret Service protection detail of former Vice President Kamala Harris.

Former vice presidents are entitled to six months of taxpayer-funded Secret Service protection upon leaving office, according to the 2008 Former Vice President Protection Act. Former President Joe Biden extended Harris’ detail to last 18 months prior to leaving office.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney requested a six-month Secret Service protection from then-President Barack Obama, who granted the request.

The latest news of Harris’s taxpayer-funded protection revocation comes as the former vice president is about to embark on a book tour, set to visit 15 cities nationwide promoting her memoir, “107 Days,” chronicling her ill-fated, short-lived presidential campaign.

After losing her presidential bid to Trump in November, rumors swirled about her possible bid for governor of California.

In July, Harris quashed the possible candidacy, saying she was focusing on “public service.”

“But after deep reflection, I’ve decided that I will not run for governor in this election,” Harris, 60, said in her statement on X. “For now, my leadership – and public service – will not be in elected office.”

“I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people, helping elect Democrats across the nation who will fight fearlessly and sharing more details in the months ahead about my own plans,” she added.

 

Is There Really a $12 Trillion Gold Deposit in Uganda?

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) Over the last several weeks, I’ve seen several stories about a massive gold discovery in Uganda.

According to the reports, exploration surveys indicate a deposit of 31 million tonnes of ore that would yield approximately 320,158 tonnes of refined gold, valued at $12 trillion.

To put that into perspective, according to the World Gold Council, about 216,265 tonnes of gold have been mined throughout history.

In other words, the Ugandan government claims it has discovered gold reserves that are 56 percent larger than the total amount of gold mined — ever.

If this seems a little suspicious, that’s because it is.

I’m not sure why this story is suddenly making the rounds again. The initial report came out in 2022.

At the time, Reuters reported that an official with the Ugandan Ministry of Energy and Development reported the discovery.

Quite frankly, it just doesn’t add up. I intuitively recognized this, and so did Luke Burgess. He ran the numbers and published an article on OutsiderClub.com.

Given the amount of refined gold the Ugandans claimed they could produce from the ore, the average gold grade would be more than 10,000 grams per tonne (g/t).

According to Burgess, the highest graded gold mine at the time was Agnico Eagle’s Fosterville mine in Australia. Before the pandemic, the average grade was around 40 g/t. During the first quarter of 2022, it had dropped to 28 g/t. Even then, it was still the highest graded mine.

Burgess summed it up.

“So, the absolute highest-grade gold mine in the world right now is operating with an average head grade of under 30 g/t. And the Ugandan government is saying its country has a massive ore resource with an average grade over 10,000 g/t.

“Unbelievable!”

Yes. Yes, it is.

Burgess said that if there was such a discovery, “there would be visible gold absolutely everywhere. Gold would be spilling out of the rock. You wouldn’t be able to walk without stepping on gold.

So, why would the Ugandan government fabricate such a story?

Maybe there was just a mistake in the reporting. Perhaps they meant 320,158 ounces of gold. That would make more sense.

Or maybe something else is going on.

The answer may well lie in the very first sentence of that Reuters report.

“It [the Ugandan government] wants to attract big investors to develop the sector hitherto dominated by small wildcat miners.”

And guess what? I ran across this article on mining-technology.com reporting on the opening of Uganda’s first large-scale gold mining. Buried in the article was this tidbit.

“Furthermore, a new mining law enacted in 2022 allows the Ugandan Government to take a mandatory 15 percent free carry stake in all mining operations within the country.”

What year was this immense Ugandan gold discovery?

Oh, yeah. 2022.

Now, I’m not saying the Ugandan government lied to incentivize big miners to come into the country – but I’m not saying they didn’t either.

This raises another question. Why does a story that seems sketchy when given the slightest bit of thought keep getting traction out there in the social media world?

It could be that people are drawn to fantastic stories – and a $12 trillion gold deposit is certainly fantastic.

But there could be more to it.

I’m speculating here, but it could be that people who would prefer you not be so bullish on gold keep recycling this tale. I’m talking about Bitcoin pumpers or government actors who want you to believe gold isn’t all that valuable. After all, if we have this massive discovery, gold isn’t quite as scarce as we thought, and therefore less valuable.

In fact, other stories along the same line seem to get a lot of play. For instance, the fact that there is apparently an asteroid containing trillions of dollars of gold floating out there in space. Never mind that there is no way to mine the gold; the story is often used to point out that gold is more abundant than we realize.

But it isn’t.

And then there was the recent headline declaring that scientists have turned lead into gold. Of course, according to researchers’ calculations, it would take about 33.9 billion years to create one ounce of gold at the rate they can create it.

Yes, there is a lot of gold in the universe. Heck, there is a lot of gold on Earth. But we can’t get to it. And if we can’t get to it, it may as well not exist.

Don’t let these stories fool you. Gold is scarce. Gold is valuable. And you want some gold. You know you do!


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

Money Metals CEO: Bulls Come in Silver and Platinum Too!

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) Money Metals CEO Stefan Gleason recently appeared on Investing News with Charlotte McLeod and explained why he thinks gold will take off again when U.S. investors wake up. But he’s not just bullish on gold. He also sees more upside in the silver and platinum markets.

Silver broke out a few months ago and briefly touched $40 an ounce. Since then, it has consolidated and traded in $36 to $38 range.

Gleason said during the recent move, silver was playing catch-up with gold.

“I think definitely silver typically will start slow and then catch up as people move more into the metals. We’re starting to see that transition where silver is finally getting a little bit of love.”

He noted that the gold-silver ratio has narrowed somewhat from the high of 106-to-1, but it remains historically elevated at around 88-to-1.

Historically, the ratio has averaged around 60-to-1 in the modern era. When it gets exceptionally wide as it is now, it tends to snap back to the mean, typically in a relatively short timeframe.

For instance, in 2020, the gold-silver ratio set a record of 123-to-1 as Covid hysteria gripped the world and then plunged to around 60-to-1 as central banks around the world cranked up the money creation machine to cope with governments shutting down economies.

In another example of this snap-back, the gold-silver ratio fell to 30-to-1 in 2011 after rising to over 80-to-1 during the money creation of the Great Recession in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

“I think that that is what we see happen as the gold bull market matures, silver starts catching up, and then eventually outperforms. So, I think we’re kind of in that transition period where the gold bull market is well underway and silver is starting to make a move.”

Gleason said he sees $40 as a key level. Once it breaks through that resistance, he said he thinks silver will run toward $50, perhaps as early as next year.

“If it breaks above $50, that is going to be a huge signal, a huge bias signal. And that’s when I think you’re going to see a lot of attention turn to silver in the mainstream.”

With gold extremely expensive (possibly over $3,500 by that point), silver will become an increasingly attractive option.

“People will start looking at silver as a bargain, and even though it’s at $45 or $50 or $55, I think it’s going to gain momentum, and especially if it gets over that $50 price, I do think that we’re going to be challenging the $50 level by next year. So, we’ll see. And then if it breaks – and I think it breaks through that – it’s going to go quite a bit higher from there.”

Gleason said he’s also seen some growing interest in platinum.

Platinum charted a 49.8 percent gain through H1, rising from around $900 an ounce in January to $1,360 at the end of June. That compares with a 25.9 percent increase in the price of gold and a 24.9 percent rise in silver.

In the second quarter alone, platinum jumped over 35 percent, closing H1 at a price not seen since 2014.

Supply constraints seem to be the primary driver behind this platinum rally.

Even with the big price increase this year, Gleason said that platinum and palladium only make up about 2 percent of his company’s business in terms of revenue and sales volume.

“It is very low in proportion to gold and silver, and I think that’s appropriate. I mean it, really, is a different type of metal. It’s extremely economically sensitive. It is obviously tight; there are some shortage indications of tightness in supply – palladium perhaps less so. I’m very bullish on platinum, but I wouldn’t put that at the center of my precious metals portfolio. It’s just another sort of diversifier, and platinum has historically been at a premium to the gold price up until about 10 years ago.”

Gleason pointed out that platinum was more expensive than gold at one time.

“I think that alone is a good reason to maybe get a little platinum exposure because of that catch-up move. There are some interesting things happening in platinum on the electronic side, on the hydrogen fuel cell batteries, and things like that. Jewelry: There’s jewelry demand switching from gold to platinum. And so those are other factors that are driving platinum right now. But again, I would keep it as a small allocation, and that’s certainly what we’re seeing. We’re selling more platinum, but just a little bit more.”

Gleason called the precious metals market, in general, “undiscovered.”

“I can tell you, if you ask all the people in your orbit, how many of them own gold and silver, I bet very few, maybe one, two, 3 percent. Maybe they’re not going to tell you, which is probably smart. You don’t want to talk about what you own, especially if you have it in your house or whatever. But the bottom line is less than 2 percent of the U.S public has any gold or silver whatsoever other than maybe a piece of jewelry, and that’s a problem.”

He said he thinks that’s going to change.

“I think we’re very early. I think, again, as the stock market rolls over or inflation kind of runs away, and yet the Fed is slashing rates, there’s no tomorrow. I think we’re going to see an awakening in our country and in North America and in Europe, where we’ll see a lot of people coming into this. But right now, we’re very early and we’re kind of on the cutting edge, you and I and everybody who’s listening today.”


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

SCOOP: Foreign Gov’t Provided the U.S. w/ Report about Would-be Trump Assassin

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) The Justice Department disclosed on Friday that a foreign government has provided it with a report about alleged would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh’s activities in Ukraine.

The report was disclosed in a DOJ filing that lists the evidence it’s provided to Routh ahead of his Sept. 8 trial.

The DOJ initially hid the existence of the report by only labeling it as “LE Reports Combined” on a list of discovery for Routh. However, last week Judge Aileen Cannon ordered the DOJ to provide more details about the records.

On Friday, the DOJ complied, telling her that the new records include “reports and supporting documentation from a foreign law enforcement agency documenting reporting from a confidential source about an individual with initials M.R.M. who was in contact with the defendant in Ukraine.”

According to the DOJ, it didn’t receive those records from the unnamed foreign government until “after May 23,” which was its deadline to provide all discovery to Routh. No further details were provided about the report.

The foreign source in Ukraine was one of many people to report Routh’s activities to a government agency.

 The Wall Street Journal reported last September that Routh was reported to Customs and Border Protection in June 2022, and then the State Department, FBI and Interpol in 2023.

Chelsea Walsh, a nurse who knew Routh in Ukraine, first reported him to CBP in 2022. She again reported him to the FBI and Interpol in 2023, after she heard that was attempting to recruit Syrian refugees to fight in Ukraine.

“She filed an online report with the FBI and Interpol outlining her concerns about Routh and others, she said. Neither Customs nor the FBI followed up with her,” the WSJ reported.

“But after the apparent attempt on Trump’s life Sunday, she called the FBI tip line and reported her concerns about Routh again in a 22-minute conversation.”

According to Just the News, CBP interviewed Routh, who told them that he had been recruiting as many as 100 foreign fighters from Taiwan, Afghanistan and Moldova to join Ukraine’s war against Russia. Routh was then referred to the DHS’s investigatory arm, Homeland Security Investigations, but no further action was taken.

Last year, HSI Director Katrina Berger defended her agency’s decision to ignore Routh.

“Based on information I read, there wouldn’t be any reason to take him immediately into custody. He didn’t make threats to the President or the former President, for instance,” she said at a congressional hearing last September.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Slain J6er Ashli Babbitt to Receive Military Funeral Honors

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) The U.S. government is offering military funeral honors for Ashli Babbitt, the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol Hill protestor who was killed at 35 by an officer during the event.

Babbitt, a 14-year Air Force veteran, was shot and killed by then-Lt. Michael Byrd while crawling through a window in the Capitol building during the Jan. 6 protests.

Byrd has claimed that he acted with “the utmost courage” and “saved countless lives.”

However, earlier records obtained by Judicial Watch found that other officers at the scene did not see a weapon in Babbitt’s hands prior to the shooting and that they did not hear Byrd issue any verbal commands prior to the shooting. Lt. Byrd later confessed that he shot Ashli before seeing her hands or assessing her intentions or even identifying her as female.

Babbitt has gained martyr status among Republicans, and the Trump administration agreed to pay just under $5 million to settle a wrongful-death lawsuit that her family filed over her shooting.

Matthew Lohmeier, an under secretary of the Air Force, said on X that the decision was “long overdue,” and shared a post from a conservative legal group that was advocating for Babbitt’s family. Judicial Watch said the family had requested military honors from former President Joe Biden’s administration and had been denied.

In a statement, a U.S. Air Force spokesperson said that “after reviewing the circumstances” of Babbitt’s death, military funeral honors were offered to the family. Babbitt was a senior airman.

The post shared by Lohmeier included a link to a letter the Air Force under secretary wrote to Babbitt’s family, inviting them to meet him at the Pentagon.

“After reviewing the circumstances of Ashli’s death, and considering the information that has come forward since then, I am persuaded that the previous determination was incorrect,” the Aug. 15 letter

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

Saudis Can’t Dodge Lawsuit over Their Role in 9/11

(Headline USA) A federal judge in New York on Thursday rejected Saudi Arabia’s latest effort to dismiss civil claims that it supported the 9/11 hijackers.

Judge George B. Daniels said in a written opinion that his decision pertained to jurisdiction rather than the merits of the claims against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

However, he found the claims legally sufficient to proceed to trial, noting that an imam and an accountant’s employment by Saudi Arabia likely had some connection with their support of two al-Qaida members who came to the United States in early 2000 to study English and take flight lessons.

Lawyers for Saudi Arabia argued that the nation and the U.S. were partners in the 1990s against terrorism, al-Qaida and its founder, Osama bin Laden.

Lawyers for relatives of 9/11 victims claim that a group of extremist religious leaders in Saudi Arabia aided the 9/11 hijackers who flew planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

In lawsuits, hundreds of victims’ relatives and injured survivors, along with insurance companies and businesses, claim that employees of the Saudi government directly and knowingly assisted the airplane hijackers and plotters and fueled al-Qaida’s development into a terrorist organization by funding charities that supported them.

Some defendants, including Iran, the Taliban and al-Qaida, already have been found in default.

During oral arguments last year, attorney Michael Kellogg noted that Saudi Arabia in the 1990s stripped bin Laden of his citizenship and had taken more actions against him than any other country prior to the Sept. 11 attacks.

A message seeking comment from Kellogg was not immediately returned.

The law firm of Kreinder & Kreindler, which represents plaintiffs, said in a statement that the judge’s decision “ensures that the plaintiffs may continue their long pursuit of truth and justice.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press



White House Appoints Interim CDC Director; Standoff Continues with Former Director

(The Center Square) The White House has appointed Department of Health and Human Services Deputy Secretary Jim O’Neill as interim director for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, The Washington Post has reported.

The attorneys for its just-terminated director maintain she has not been fired and will not resign.

At a press briefing Thursday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that President Donald Trump had fired former CDC Director Susan Monarez. Her lawyers continue to contest that claim and insist she is still the agency’s director.

“WH @PressSec can say whatever she wants because thankfully free speech still exists in this country,” wrote Mark Zaid, one of Monarez’s attorneys, on social media platform X. “But it doesn’t make her comments factually true, even when from a White House podium.”

Monarez is a longtime government scientist and was confirmed by the Senate and sworn into office in July after Trump appointed her in March. A joint statement from her lawyers claimed that she had been “targeted” for “[refusing] to rubber-stamp unscientific, reckless directives and fire dedicated health experts.”

Leavitt said Thursday, in conjunction with statements from other White House spokespeople, that Monarez was out of step with the administration’s plan to improve the nation’s health.

“She was not aligned with the president’s mission to make America healthy again, and the secretary asked her to resign. She said she would, and then she said she wouldn’t, so the president fired her, which he has every right to do,” Leavitt told reporters.

The back-and-forth started with a post on social media platform X around 5:30 p.m. Wednesday from the official Health and Human Services account stating that Monarez had been terminated.

“Susan Monarez is no longer director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We thank her for her dedicated service to the American people. @SecKennedy has full confidence in his team at @CDCgov who will continue to be vigilant in protecting Americans against infectious diseases at home and abroad,” the post read.

Her lawyers pushed back on X, saying that she had neither “resigned nor received notification from the White House that she has been fired” and “she will not resign.” They have argued that because she was a presidential appointee confirmed by the Senate, only the “president himself” has the power to fire her.

The White House would not confirm with The Center Square how it had notified Monarez or the CDC of her termination – only that it had, in fact, fired her.

“Since Susan Monarez refused to resign despite informing HHS leadership of her intent to do so, the White House has terminated Monarez from her position with the CDC,” White House Spokesman Kush Desai said in an email.

The Center Square reached out to the law firm of Abbe Lowell – Monarez’s other lawyer who has also defended Hunter Biden, Bob Menendez, Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump – to confirm whether it was pursuing a lawsuit against the administration. It did not respond in time for publication.

Monarez’s termination is just one of many layoffs or headline-grabbing terminations that have occurred in the federal government this week. The other most high-profile case is that of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. Though reportedly no American president has ever fired a Fed governor before, Trump terminated Cook Monday.

A president is allowed to do so “for cause,” according to the law. Trump’s cause is mortgage fraud, as Cook allegedly indicated two residences in different states as her primary residence.

Lowell, who is also defending Cook, filed a lawsuit against the president Thursday, arguing that the president doesn’t have sufficient cause as Cook has not been convicted of a crime at this time.

When asked at Thursday’s briefing whether the president would wait to fill Cook’s post until the lawsuit had been resolved, Leavitt would not give a definitive answer.

“I will leave that to the president to make that decision and that announcement himself,” Leavitt replied. She earlier said that Trump “has the cause that he needs to fire this individual and the administration would “continue to fight this battle.”

Three-dozen employees of the Federal Emergency Management Agency were also put on leave this week,according to ABC News, after submitting a public letter criticizing the administration and requesting that changes be made.

US Announces Plan To Arm Ukraine With Thousands of Long-Range Cruise Missiles

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.comThe Trump administration has announced that it approved an $825 million weapons deal that will arm Ukraine with thousands of Extended Range Attack Munition (ERAM) air-launched missiles, which can hit targets up to 280 miles away, a significantly further range than other missiles that the US has sent into the proxy war.

The Pentagon’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) said the deal will provide Ukraine with 3,350 ERAM missiles, 3,350 Embedded Global Positioning System (GPS)/Inertial Navigation Systems, and other related equipment.

The arms sale will be funded in part by Foreign Military Financing (FMF), a State Department program that provides foreign governments with money to buy US-made weapons. Other funding for the deal will come from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway.

The Wall Street Journal first reported on Saturday that the Trump administration had approved the deal and that the missiles would start arriving in Ukraine within six weeks. The report also said that the administration had been quietly blocking Ukraine from using US-provided missiles in attacks on Russian territory, but the provision of the ERAMs suggests that might change.

Up to this point, the longest-range weapon the US has provided to Ukraine is the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), which is a munition that can be fired by the HIMARS rocket systems and can hit targets up to 190 miles away. Last year, the Biden administration gave Ukraine the green light to use ATACMS on Russian territory, which marked a significant escalation of the proxy war.

In response to the US-backed ATACMS strikes on its territory, Russia altered its nuclear doctrine to lower the threshold for nuclear weapons, underscoring how seriously Moscow viewed the escalation.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.

 

US-Funded Hunger Monitor Concurs With UN-Backed IPC That Famine Is Occurring in Gaza

(Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.comA US government-funded hunger monitor has concurred with the UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) that famine is taking place in the Gaza Strip.

The Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS Net), which has historically been funded by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), issued a report on August 22, the same day as the IPC report, stating that famine is ongoing in the Gaza Governorate, which includes Gaza City.

The FEWS Net and IPC reports said that famine is also likely occurring in the North Gaza Governorate and that the situation may even be worse there, but that it couldn’t be officially confirmed due to the lack of data. The report said that famine is projected to begin in the Khan Younis and Deir el-Balah Governorates by the end of September unless immediate action is taken.

“FEWS NET’s classification of current or projected Famine (IPC Phase 5) in three governorates was reached jointly with the Integrated Phase Classification (IPC) partnership and independently reviewed by the Famine Review Committee (FRC),” FEWS Net said in its report.

The FEWS Net report also made clear that Israel was responsible for the famine in northern Gaza and cited the Israeli government’s own data to say that no food was allowed into the area from March to May. “After 22 months of war, repeated mass displacements, the destruction of nearly all essential infrastructure, and extreme restrictions on the entry of food, northern Gazans have long exhausted their coping capacity,” Fews Net said.

The US-funded hunger monitor also said that Israel’s plans to take over Gaza City will only make the situation worse. “The confinement of the population, density of overcrowding amid scarce shelter, and increasing strain on extremely limited humanitarian and healthcare services are all expected to worsen in the lead-up to Israel’s plan to forcibly displace the entire population of Gaza City by October,” FEWS Net said.

The report noted the killing of Palestinians near aid distribution sites run by the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an effort strongly supported by the Trump administration. “Over 700 deaths linked to the distribution of aid were reported across the Gaza Strip in July alone, including 390 in or near GHF distribution sites in the south,” FEWS Net said.

Antiwar.com asked the State Department if it agreed with or rejected the findings of FEWS Net. A State Department spokesperson pointed to President Trump’s earlier comments that “starvation” was taking place in Gaza and said that the administration will “neither use nor legitimize data from the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry (GHM) and we are seeking clarification on if and how any of that was used in IPC reporting.”

The Famine Review Committee report on the famine determination listed Gaza Health Ministry mortality data as one of its many sources used to determine that famine was taking place, noting that surveys and indirect evidence suggest the ministry’s numbers are likely a significant undercount, which aligns with studies of the death toll in Gaza.

“Multiple surveys of the population in Gaza indicate that the Ministry of Health facilities-based mortality fails to fully capture non-trauma mortality,” the report reads. “The high numbers of malnourished children and mothers of young children unable to access appropriate diets or nutrition treatment, in combination with environmental conditions detailed in this report, are known to exacerbate fatality rates among the malnourished. These indirect sources of evidence indicate a much higher mortality rate than malnutrition deaths reported by the Ministry of Health, providing reasonable evidence that mortality thresholds for famine have been passed.”

While the State Department didn’t outright reject the report, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has boosted Israel’s claims that the IPC report was an “outright lie.”

FEWS Net was suspended by the Trump administration during its review of foreign aid, but was relaunched back in June. The hunger monitor was first established by USAID in the 1980s and is now likely funded directly by the State Department since the Trump administration has merged USAID’s remaining operations with the State Department.

Last year, FEWS Net issued a report warning that famine was imminent in northern Gaza due to an Israeli blockade, but it was retracted due to pressure from the Biden administration. Then-US Ambassador to Israel Jack Lew blasted the report as “irresponsible.”

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.