Monday, June 2, 2025

McCain, John Kerry Considered Becoming Running Mates

0

‘We kind of flirted, but didn’t go on a date…’

Kerry Claims He Was For McCain Before He Was Against Him
John McCain and John Kerry/IMAGE: CBS News

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Remember when the press hated John McCain?

During his 2008 candidacy, the late Arizona senator was excoriated for slinging mud and committing acts of double-speak against the anointed candidate Obama, all while the media bandied around salacious charges about an alleged affair with a lobbyist 30 years his junior.

That was before McCain’s full-on conversion to the Democratic caucus, personally thwarting a GOP repeal of the Affordable Care Act and refusing to relinquish his Senate seat as his health declined.

His death has now turned McCain into a media darling (with most coverage pulling double duty as a backhanded slap against President Donald Trump).

Now, the king of political grandstanding, former Massachusetts senator and Obama Secretary of State John Kerry, has hopped on the bandwagon, saying he was for McCain before he was against him.

On Sunday, Kerry wistfully reflected that he had considered McCain as a running mate in his 2004 campaign against George W. Bush.

“We kind of flirted, but didn’t go on a date,” he told CBS News.

In retrospect, the career politicians, both failed presidential candidates who capitalized on their prominence as Vietnam “war heros” and weathered the shifting political trade-winds in D.C. by constantly revising their allegiances and positions, were two peas in a pod.

McCain, who bore a grudge against George W. Bush after a vicious 2000 primary battle, made common cause with Kerry during the 2004 campaign, as Kerry faced the incumbent Bush.

When Kerry, who had sold-out fellow Vietnam vets during his 1971 anti-war testimony before Congress, found his service record under attack by the group Swift Vets and POWs for Truth, McCain used his war-hero cachet to denounce the critics, calling their ad “dishonest and dishonorable.”

Unfortunately for McCain, Kerry didn’t return the favor three years later, using their past ‘flirtation’ instead to attack the Republican presidential contender.

In March and April of 2007, Democrats, including Kerry levied the charge that McCain had considered switching parties as a way of undermining his nascent campaign.

McCain denied the charge, and the two briefly went back and forth over who courted whom.

Kerry (ironically, given his own Iraq war waffling) would continue attacking McCain as a flip-flopper throughout the 2008 race.

For that, however, McCain would return the favor during Kerry’s failed Iran negotiations.

As Politico’s Michael Crowley reported, he branded Kerry a “human wrecking ball” and said he had “accomplished nothing except mileage as secretary of state.”

The article cited an anonymous Kerry associate discussing the on-again, off-again relationship between the two senators:

“This has always been a volcanic marriage of two strong willed, proud guys who deeply respect each other, but sometimes drive each other absolutely crazy. It’s a real friendship, unlike so many of the cliched Washington variety … But this phase has been jarring. Kerry has been surprised by McCain’s public tirades. It’s crossed some lines that Kerry himself is always careful never to cross.”

Conveniently, Kerry recently garnered headlines for floating, or at least refusing to rule out, the possibility of another run in 2020.

For McCain, whose feud with Trump has now become a pivotal part of his enduring legacy, the opportunity to “swiftboat” his own party one last time  could be no more fitting of a tribute.

Nike Faces Backlash from Kaepernick Ad Campaign

‘[The NFL] forces me to choose between my favorite sport and my country. I chose country…’

Kaepernick
IMAGE: Johnny Ahoy via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) A day after Nike announced that Colin Kaepernick would be one of the faces of its new ad campaign celebrating the 30th anniversary of its “Just Do It” slogan, pro-anthem advocates responded on social media–and with their pocketbooks.

Kaepernick, the former San Francisco 49ers quarterback, launched the movement of kneeling during the national anthem in the 2016 season.

After getting benched for performance reasons, he obtained a release from his contract prior to the 2017 season.

Since then, Kaepernick has been unsuccessful in securing a deal with another team, but the debate continued to spread last season as President Donald Trump spoke out against it, encouraging fans to boycott the network.

Kaepernick, meanwhile, has received recognition from many left-leaning organizations, including GQ magazine, ESPN, Amnesty International and the ACLU.

In a Twitter post on Monday that he made for the Nike campaign, he wrote, “Believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything.”

Many who reacted to the news seemed more than willing to sacrifice their Nike apparel in support of the national anthem, with hashtags “JustBurnIt” and #BoycottNike trending on Twitter.

Country music singer John Rich posted a photo of a pair of slashed Nike sports socks.

In addition to the social media campaign, The Wrap reported that shares in Nike’s stock had plunged about 4 percent by Tuesday morning, losing $3.75 billion in market value.

The BBC reported that Andrew H Scott, the mayor of Coal Run, Kentucky, said he was “officially done” with Nike and the NFL and asked Nike to cancel an order.

However, Kaepernick did receive some high-profile support from former CIA director John Brennan, who recently had his security clearance revoked by President Donald Trump.

“Colin Kaepernick drew our collective attention to the problem of continued racial injustice in America,” Brennan tweeted. “He did so not to disrespect our flag but to give meaning to the words of the preamble of our Constitution — ‘in order to form a more perfect union.’ Well done, Colin, well done.”

A national poll last week conducted by NBC News and the Wall Street Journal found that 54 percent of respondents said it was inappropriate to kneel during the national anthem.

The brouhaha likely will do little to help the foundering NFL as its new season begins this week. Political pressure from Trump and economic pressure from fan boycotts prompted the league to establish guidelines against the kneeling, but shortly thereafter pressure from the players’ union forced them to suspend the guidelines.

Speaking to The New York Times, NFL spokesperson Sandra Carreon-John seemed to said the NFL (which currently is embroiled in a discrimination suit with Kaepernick) had no input in his signing.

“Colin is not currently employed by an NFL team and has no contractual obligation to the NFL,” she said.

Other celebrity athletes involved with the campaign are Serena Williams, LeBron James, Shaquem Griffin, Odell Beckham Jr. and Lacey Baker.

Griffin and Beckham are both current NFL players.

Kaepernick Gets Nike Deal; Most Find Kneeling ‘Inappropriate’

0

‘Believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything…’

Colin Kaepernick/IMAGE: NFL via Youtube
Colin Kaepernick/IMAGE: NFL via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Only in America could a middling quarterback, the product of a privileged upbringing, facing the autumn of his career, manage to convert his inability to secure a contract into a lucrative marketing deal simply by growing his hair out and kneeling when he should be standing.

Perhaps it is a reflection of the perverse nature of identity politics, or maybe Colin Kaepernick is simply far better at marketing himself than he was at regularly hitting the end zone.

With another NFL season about to start, Nike announced that it was making the former San Francisco 49ers quarterback the new face celebrating the 30th anniversary of its “Just Do It” campaign.

It comes on the heels of another Kaepernick business move, to trademark the T-shirt slogan “I’m with Kap” and forward motion in a grievance against the NFL alleging discrimination, which seems poised to go to court.

Kaepernick began his kneeling campaign in April 2016. Although the mixed-race Kaepernick was himself raised by white adoptive parents in a comfortable, suburban setting, he said he was protesting the oppression of African Americans.

After getting benched for performance reasons, he opted out of his contract with the 49ers in March 2017 but was never signed by any other franchise.

The attention garnered him recognition in left-leaning outlets from ESPN to GQ to the ACLU, and the kneeling debate hit fever pitch the following season after President Donald Trump spoke out against it.

A national poll last week conducted by NBC News and the Wall Street Journal found that 54 percent of respondents said it was inappropriate to kneel during the national anthem.

The NFL established guidelines against the kneeling that would fine players who weren’t in compliance, as it does for pretty much any other type of distracting or unseemly behavior from players.

However, objections from the players’ union forced the league to suspend the policy.

Meanwhile, despite the fact that he seems to be cashing in quite well without having to lift a finger, Kaepernick recently posted a Nike ad to his Twitter that implied his protest had entailed “sacrificing everything.”

Bill Clinton Caught Ogling Ariana Grande at Aretha Franklin’s Funeral

0

‘Oh my. Bill Clinton is creepy as hell…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Paging “Saturday Night Live” and “To Catch a Predator.”

A moment of potential comedy gold—or was it pure horror—transpired Friday at the funeral for “Queen of Soul” Aretha Franklin.

As 25-year-old Ariana Grande, a former Nickelodeon child actor, serenaded the audience with the Carole King song “(You Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Woman,” made famous by Franklin, ex-President Bill Clinton was caught struggling to keep his eyes up top.

Clinton was spotted in the front row (alongside Louis Farrakhan, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson), with wife Hillary nowhere in sight—though reportedly in attendance.

The Rev. Jackson also appeared to admire the view.

Bill Clinton later was photographed posing with the newly engaged Grande and her fiance, former “SNL” Weekend Update anchor Pete Davidson.

Social media simultaneously cringed and relished in the gaffe.

However, in the year since the #MeToo movement launched, many have called on the leering Democrat to finally be held accountable for his bevvy of past sexual harassment allegations (among other things).

At least, he could show a little R-E-S-P-E-C-T.

WaPo/ABC Survey Claims 49 Percent Support Trump Impeachment

0

‘I can see how at a moment in time 49 percent of the public would think impeachment proceedings are at least worth exploring…’

Poll: Trump Approval Drops to Lowest Point Since Inauguration(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) A survey conducted jointly by The Washington Post and ABC News released on Friday showed a growing number of respondents supported impeachment of President Donald Trump and disapproved of his job performance.

However, tell-tale signs of sampling bias and other questions of survey methodology undermined the confidence interval, as many remain skeptical of political polling in the wake of the 2016 election.

According to the survey, which claimed to have a margin of error of 3.5 percent, 49 percent of respondents agreed that Congress should begin impeachment proceedings on the president (including 40 percent who strongly agreed), while only 46 percent disagreed (33 percent strongly).

The survey says it randomly sampled 1003 adults nationally, both by landline and cell phone. For a confidence level of 99 percent with the provided margin of error, however, it would have needed to survey about 350 more adults given the U.S. adult population of approximately 250 million.

Instead, the left-leaning news organizations chose to accept a significantly weaker confidence level (opening the possibility that the entire survey could be bunk) to fit their margin of error within the spread.

But assuming the survey results were an accurate statistical reflection of the population sampled, the bigger concern would be whether the sample itself accurately reflected the U.S. population.

As the investigative blog Zero Hedge explained in October 2016, many polling agencies, including the WaPo/ABC ones, systematically build in bias to their polling by oversampling certain segments of the population, even as they claim to be presenting a random sample.

Zero Hedge showed, based on the leaked John Podesta emails, that Hillary Clinton agents actively encouraged oversampling, resulting in such headlines as “Clinton Vaults to a Double Digit Lead, Boosted by Broad Disapproval of Trump” two weeks before the November 2016 election.

One clear indicator of oversampling on the latest survey may be reactions to the economy. Even if respondents were reacting on ethical questions to the double-whammy conviction of former Trump associate Paul Manafort and the guilty plea of Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, few could complain about the stock market surging to historic highs during the survey period.

However, the WaPo/ABC results found 45 percent approval to 47 percent disapproval (36 percent strongly) in Trump’s handling of the economy.

Despite conflicting data from a CNBC economic survey in late June, which showed a majority approval, the WaPo/ABC poll had Trump’s economic approval in decline since it last asked the question in April.

Recent surveys reported on by Liberty Headlines reveal that many small-business owners approve of Trump’s policies, while a majority of blue-collar laborers also favor the president.

The survey also suggested a precipitous decline of about 4 percent (or about 10 million U.S. adults) in Trump’s overall approval rating since April, with those approving at 36 percent and disapproving at 60 percent.

Despite the questions surrounding the survey methodology, as writer Dan Calabrese said, the results are nothing to scoff at with the midterm elections approaching.

“When you start with the fact that 40 percent of the electorate hates Trump no matter what he does, and you pound away at those themes day after day, sure, I can see how at a moment in time 49 percent of the public would think impeachment proceedings are at least worth exploring,” Calabrese wrote.

Trump has continued to hammer at the unprecedented bias in news coverage and social media. But he must beware of getting in over his head while appealing only to his core base of supporters.

FBI’s Server-Hacking Statement a Classic Non-denial Denial

‘Partisan politics, sadly, are very much at play within some of the leadership at the FBI…’

Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton/IMAGE: Bloomberg News via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) From Bill Clinton’s redefining the meaning of is in the Monica Lewinsky scandal to ex-CIA Director John Brennan’s fast-and-loose liberties with the term civilian casualties in Obama-era drone strikes, the Left loves its word games.

So, with the Clintons and the intelligence community seemingly in collusion to bury reports on Hillary’s private email server getting hacked, it was only a matter of time before semantics was deployed.

After The Daily Caller first broke the news Tuesday—later tweeted by President Donald Trump—that it had confirmed Chinese hackers were able to access Hillary’s emails by inserting special code into the metadata, the FBI issued what seemed to be an unequivocal denial.

Fox News reported that the agency disputed the story by saying it “has not found any evidence the servers were compromised.”

But according to Rep. Louie Gohmert, this may only have been technically true because it was the FBI’s oversight agency, the Intelligence Community Instructor General’s office, that found the actual evidence during a forensic analysis.

In a statement he released on Wednesday, Gohmert called the FBI denial “very deceptive in its omission.”

After the ICIG had flagged the evidence for top FBI officials in 2015, including former counterintelligence chief Peter Strzok, the agency responded by doing nothing, Gohmert said.

Louie Gohmert and Peter Strzok
Louie Gohmert and Peter Strzok/IMAGE: CBS News via Youtube

“One thing has been made acutely clear,” he said, “partisan politics, sadly, are very much at play within some of the leadership at the FBI.”

According to Fox, the FBI eventually did conduct a “limited” intrusion analysis of the server, but was unable to recover all the equipment and server data for the relevant time.

Despite a congressional order to the contrary, Clinton had the server bleached sometime in early 2015, handing over only about 55,000 emails that were redacted at her discretion.

When asked about wiping the server in August 2015, she replied, “What, like with a cloth or something?”

On Fox’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton pointed out another key omission in the denial: Nobody ever said the server wasn’t compromised.

While some in the left-wing media have used the very disputedness of the claim as reason to dismiss it whole-cloth, Fitton said the FBI’s motive to cover up was clear.

“The answer would be embarrassing,” he said, and it would “undermine the fiction that Hillary Clinton caused no damage and deserved no prosecution.”

However, Fitton said former FBI Director James Comey, who famously let Clinton off the hook in July 2016, was “the best witness” when he acknowledged that a foreign agency might easily have covered its tracks when hacking the unsecured server.

“No one has ruled out that her server has been compromised—in fact, Comey said, ‘We just assume it had been compromised.’”

Sources Confirm Clinton Server Hacked by Chinese; FBI Did Nothing

‘What are the odds that the FBI and DOJ are right on top of this?’

Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton/IMAGE: ABC 15 Arizona via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Chinese Intelligence may be up to its ears in yoga tips if reports prove true that its operatives secretly embedded code in Hillary Clinton’s private server metadata to receive a ‘courtesy copy’ of all her emails.

After it was hinted at in a July  12 House Judiciary Committee hearing with disgraced FBI official Peter Strzok, The Daily Caller investigated the matter and says it confirmed with two sources that the emails were, in fact, hacked.

A forensic analysis from the Intelligence Community Instructor General first brought the issue to light. But even after ICIG investigator Frank Rucker alerted Strzok, the FBI reportedly did nothing to follow up.

According to a Fox News report, the FBI continues to dispute the claims, saying it has found no evidence that Clinton’s servers were compromised.

However, previous ICIG investigations revealed FBI incompetence—or willful ignorance—in the Clinton email handling when it discovered emails stored on the unsecured server that were openly marked with a “C” denoting classified information.

In a text that Strzok sent to his mistress, Lisa Page, he acknowledged the blunder: “Holy cow, if the FBI missed this, what else was missed? … Remind me to tell you to flag for Andy [redacted] emails we (actually ICIG) found that have portion marks (C) on a couple of paras. DoJ was Very Concerned about this.”

Strzok sets up Twitter, GoFundMe accounts
Peter Strzok, PHOTO: Twitter

Despite being aware of the classified information breach, the FBI rushed to close its investigation on Clinton, with FBI Director James Comey claiming on a July 5, 2016 statement that “no reasonable prosecutor would charge her.”

Strzok was later fired for his biased and unprofessional conduct.

Fox also reported that after former Inspector General Chuck McCullough came forward publicly with concerns over the Clinton emails, he began to receive pushback on Capitol Hill from politicians such as Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and was told to consider the “political consequences.”

Following the latest findings, President Donald Trump issued a pair of tweets calling on the FBI and Justice Department to follow up or risk further damage to their credibility.

Facebook Engineer: Company IS Biased Against Conservatives

‘We are a political monoculture that’s intolerant of different views…’

Facebook's Policies Leaked on Sex, Terrorism & Violence(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Just as last year’s #MeToo movement helped bring to the surface some of the biggest open secrets in Hollywood, recent backlash against conservative censorship from Silicon Valley is exposing a scandal that should surprise nobody.

For years, tech mega-companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter have skirted accusations of extreme left-wing bias, not only with respect to users, but also endemic in their company cultures.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, after censoring right-wing radio host Alex Jones with a two-week suspension, last week acknowledged in an interview with CNN that the microblogging platform tilted to the left.

Google, which long maintained ties with the Obama administration and other liberal institutions, previously faced criticism for its “echo chamber” culture that was hostile to conservative employees. A report on Tuesday revealed the company to be actively suppressing conservative media in its search results, prompting President Donald Trump to issue an admonishment.

Facebook also has faced consumer criticism for bias in its former trending news algorithms and fact-checking practices, to name only a few concerns. Now, The New York Times reported on Tuesday, around 100 conservative Facebook employees have teamed up to challenge the hostile groupthink of leftists within the company culture.

Brian Amerige
Brian Amerige/PHOTO: LinkedIn

According to the article, the catalyst for the movement was an internal post titled “We Have a Problem with Political Diversity” from senior product engineer Brian Amerige, a self-described objectivist.

“We are a political monoculture that’s intolerant of different views,” Amerige wrote. “We claim to welcome all perspectives, but are quick to attack—often in mobs—anyone who presents a view that appears to be in opposition to left-leaning ideology.”

While their private group, “FB’ers for Political Diversity” has met with complaints from others in the company of roughly 25,000 employees, so far it has done nothing to get banned.

The group’s aim, according to the article, is “to create a space for ideological diversity within the company.”

According to the blog Zero Hedge, which posted what appeared to be the source memo, Amerige cited a litany of specific ways in which the company had been overtly hostile to conservatism, including tearing down posters that welcomed Trump supporters and removing PayPal chief Peter Thiel from their board.

Amerige also cited instances of people being fired or reported to human resources for supporting statements like “All Lives Matter,” criticizing Islamic human rights records or complaining about transgender art on display.

“We’re quick to suggest firing people who turn out to be misunderstood, and even quicker to conclude our colleagues are bigots.”

He said conservatives at the company lived in fear of being subjected to a modern-day lynch mob.

“They know that all the talk of ‘openness to different perspectives’ does not apply to causes of ‘social justice,’ immigration, ‘diversity’, and ‘equality.’ On this issues [sic], you can either keep quiet or sacrifice your reputation and career.”

Twitter Duplicitous After Children of NRA’s Dana Loesch Threatened

0

Social media site has no problem with accounts that suggest violence against conservatives and their families…

NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch
Dana Loesch (The Liberty Hound/Youtube)

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) It seems like only yesterday that Twitter and other social media sites took to their respective soapboxes about the imperative to balance community standards with the fundamental principles of free speech on their platforms.

But as National Rifle Association spokesperson Dana Loesch recently discovered, policing those ‘community standards’ is a one-way street.

The admittedly leftist shills of Silicon Valley reached their red line when right-wing broadcast personality Alex Jones, responding to the threat of censorship, told listeners to take up their “battle rifles.”

Twitter suspended Jones for two weeks for inciting violence, while sites like Apple and Youtube already had proceeded to delete his content over Jones’ since retracted statements that the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre was a false flag spearheaded by gun-control advocates.

Though the sites held forth that Jones’ ideas were justifiable censorship, Loesch found that actionable threats are not always covered, provided they support the left’s agenda.

Loesch posted on her Twitter Sunday a pair of screenshots: one showing a user named @MilanLegius who appears to be threatening the murder of Loesch’s children, and the other showing a reply from Twitter Support indicating that there was no violation of the platform’s rules.

After 12,000 retweets, 20,000 likes and 2,700 comments, Twitter finally responded by reviewing the complaint, and was conveniently able to find the issue.

It wasn’t the first case of hypocrisy by any stretch in the left’s lopsided crusade against violence.

While arguing the immorality of President Donald Trump’s executive action to suspend the “catch and release” policy and allow illegal immigrant families to be housed in separate detainment facilities at the border, “Easy Rider” star Peter Fonda escalated the debate several levels by suggesting that a mob “rip Barron Trump from his mother’s arms and put him in a cage with pedophiles.”

Fonda later apologized for the rant.

However, at press time, his verified account @iamfonda was active and contained multiple instances of profanity directed at Trump and his supporters.

Trump-Choking-Hillary Poster Stirs Controversy in Political Race

0

‘This is juvenile and pretty un-classy, not to mention that it seems to promote violence against women…’

Cardboard Clinton Cutout Stirs Controversy in Boise Commish Race
IMAGE: Diana Lachiondo (screenshot) via Facebook

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) While Democrat strategists recently paid lip-service to a renewed focus on “pocketbook issues” leading up to November’s midterm election, it seems some local candidates haven’t gotten the memo.

For consistently red Idaho, Trump’s nine-point victory margin over Hillary Clinton in Ada County (which encompasses the state capital of Boise) during the 2016 race was considered by some to be a ‘win’ for Hillary.

It’s no surprise, then, that Diana Lachiondo, a Democratic candidate for commissioner, has been running a campaign that might appear to be to the right of some Republicans in other regions, on a platform that includes responsible growth, fighting cronyism and ending the addiction epidemic.

With her race against incumbent Republican commissioner Jim Tibbs heating up, though, Lachiondo veered leftward with a familiar tactic from her party’s playbook by throwing the gender card.

On Saturday, Lachiondo shared a photo to her campaign Facebook account of the GOP booth at the county fair, which featured a cardboard cutout of Trump putting Clinton into a headlock.

“This is juvenile and pretty un-classy, not to mention that it seems to promote violence against women,” Lachiondo wrote. “Like many people, I’m sick and tired of the vitriol being hurled out there.”

After being shared on a Reddit thread and spread by local activists and media, the post went viral (by Idaho standards), receiving more than 700 shares and 200 comments as of Monday.

Some followers took their campaign to the Ada County Republicans’ Facebook page, where they regurgitated the same attack of “violence against women.” The local GOP appeared to have removed the cutout in response.

Tibbs, a former Boise police chief, has held the district since 2013.

Although his campaign did not appear to have an active social media presence, his website lists public safety, transparency and fiscal responsibility as key platform components.

A training injury with the Idaho Guard in 1972 cost Tibbs his left arm, meaning he would struggle to put an able-bodied opponent of any gender into a full headlock.