Sen. Johnson Rips Cocaine Coverup by Biden White House

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) In a Saturday interview with Newsmax’s Rita Cosby, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., expressed grave concerns about what he believes to be a cover-up of wrongdoing within the Biden administration.

Johnson highlighted the discovery of cocaine on the White House grounds, emphasizing the permissive attitude and lack of transparency exhibited by the current president.

Johnson questioned the absence of surveillance cameras in a heavily trafficked area where the cocaine was found.

“You would think there’s surveillance cameras all over the place,” Johnson stated. “I know exactly where they are. We’re in contact with the Secret Service. We’re getting no response whatsoever from the Secret Service in terms of what investigatory steps they’re taking. It shouldn’t take this long, that’s for sure.”

Drawing from his experience in oversight, Johnson expressed his lack of surprise at the agencies ignoring congressional inquiries. He noted the limited enforcement powers available to Congress and stressed the need to strengthen oversight capabilities to hold government agencies accountable.

The senator further criticized the permissive nature of the current administration, remarking on the security measures in place at the White House grounds.

“You gotta have a lot of guts, quite honestly, to walk through that building with the cocaine because you could be patted down,” Johnson added. “You certainly go through metal detectors. So you’ve got to have a lot of cojones to do something like that, which again just speaks to the permissive nature of this administration across the board.”

Addressing the conflicting statements from the Biden White House, Johnson pointed out the discrepancies regarding the Biden family’s presence during the discovery of the cocaine.

He cited press pool reports that contradicted statements made by Karine Jean-Pierre, the White House Deputy Press Secretary. Johnson criticized the administration for failing to provide accurate and consistent information.

“Why can’t you just get your story straight?” Johnson questioned. “Let’s get all the facts out front accurately so that the American people don’t start questioning what we’re trying to say here, but that’s not what they’ve done here. So again, it just looks suspicious.”

Giuliani Hit w/ Unbelievable Disciplinary Measure for Investigating 2020 Election

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani has been hit with a draconian disbarment recommendation by a disciplinary committee in Washington, D.C.

In their targeting of Giuliani, the Board on Professional Responsibility cited the mayor’s work in support of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to investigate allegations of voter interference in the 2020 election.

“[Giuliani] claimed massive election fraud but had no evidence of it,” the panel, consisting of three members, claimed in a 38-page document. “By pursuing that destructive case, Mr. Giuliani, a sworn officer of the Court, forfeited his right to practice law.”

While the political affiliation of the three-member panel is not immediately clear, Politico reported that it comprises two attorneys and one resident from the heavily Democratic-leaning District of Columbia.

In reaction to the recommendation, a representative for the former mayor criticized the committee in an interview with Politico.

“The decision-makers at the DC Bar Association are nothing more than an arm of the permanent regime in Washington,” said Ted Goodman. “This is also part of an effort to deny President Trump effective counsel by persecuting Rudy Giuliani—objectively one of the most effective prosecutors in American history. I call on rank-and-file members of the DC Bar Association to speak out against this great injustice.”

This disbarment recommendation comes just days after The Independent reported that the DOJ under President Joe Biden is preparing to file charges against Giuliani.

The recommendation also echoes past efforts by the far left to punish conservative attorneys working on election integrity. “The formal recommendation comes amid a concerted campaign to exact professional consequences for the lawyers who aided Trump’s effort to subvert the 2020 election,” Politico reported.

John Eastman and Jeff Clark are also facing similar repercussions for their work related to the 2020 election.

Prominent conservative voices decried the severe measure against Giuliani. Newsmax host Greg Kelly called the decision a disgrace in a passionate response on Twitter.

“You’re ALLOWED to represent clients and investigate CORRUPTION (Especially SCAM elections)—there are lawyers in America who represent MURDERERS and get RICH doing it, but Rudy is in trouble?” Kelly expressed on Saturday.

Fox News host and renowned author Mark Levin echoed Kelly’s sentiment, tweeting “Unfrigginbelievable” on Saturday.

NYC Mayor, NY Times Go to War Against Each Other Over Fake Photo of Fallen Police Officer

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Democrat New York City Mayor Eric Adams and the New York Times went to war against each other after the latter claimed that the former lied about carrying an old photo of his friend and fallen NYPD police officer and friend in his wallet for decades.

It all began on Thursday when the Times published an article, in which the author wrote that a portrait of Officer Robert Venable that Adams says he has long carried with him isn’t legit — and is instead just a printed-out Google image that was made to look old, the New York Post reported.

After the article was published, the mayor’s office went on the defensive immediately by accusing the Times of waging a “false attack” against Adams. As their defense, Adams’s team lined up several members of the slain officer’s family to publicly rebuke the claims.

“It is disgusting that The New York Times has chosen to have Robert Venable’s friends and family relive the tragic murder of a loved one for nothing more than feeding its obsession with dissecting every single moment of Mayor Adams’s life as the paper continues its unsuccessful campaign to paint the mayor as a liar,” his spokesman, Fabien Levy, said.

The Times pointed out that staffers inside the mayor’s office were pressured into manipulating the photo of Venable in January 2022 — just days after Adams first publicly revealed he carried the tiny photo.

The employees found an image of the fallen police officer on Google, printed it off in black and white and then splashed coffee on it to make it look old, the newspaper’s source said.

As expected, Adams’ office denied the allegation and insisted that the outlet initially contacted him on Wednesday making claims that the mayor and the slain officer were never actually friends.

“While yesterday’s initial inquiry mentioned a photo, the crux of this request and all initial questions in writing focused on the Times’ claim that there was no real relationship between the two former officers,” a statement from the mayor’s office said.

A spokesperson for the Times defended its reporting in a statement by saying that Adams’s office didn’t deny “the story’s main point.”

“[The] photo he showed to reporters and claimed to have carried for decades was made by aides, who took steps to age its appearance.”

Police Officer Killed as Criminal Rams Cop Car Amid Chase

(Headline USA) A Vermont police officer was killed and two other officers were injured when a burglary suspect crashed into two police cruisers pursuing him, Vermont State Police said.

Rutland City Police Officer Jessica Ebbighausen, 19, was killed on Friday afternoon.

The crash happened as police chased a vehicle driven by Tate Rheaume, 20, a suspect in an attempted break-in at a house, state police said.

Evidence indicates that Rheaume crossed the centerline and collided head-on with the Ebbighausen’s cruiser, police said.

The suspect’s truck also hit another police cruiser.

Ebbighausen was pronounced dead at the scene. Two other officers and Rheaume were taken to Rutland Regional Medical Center for what are believed to be non-life-threatening injuries, police said. Rheaume was transferred to the University of Vermont Medical Center in Burlington.

State police said they are investigating the role impairment and speed played in the crash and are working with the Rutland County state’s attorney on potential charges. It was not immediately known if Rheaume is being represented by an attorney.

Ebbighausen, of Ira, Vermont, started working with the Rutland Police Department in May as a part-time officer, state police said. She was scheduled to start training in August at the Vermont Police Academy to become a full-time officer, police said.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

WaPo Admits Affirmative Action Ruling Is Popular Among Americans

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Even though most Americans supported the Supreme Court‘s decision regarding affirmative action, the corrupt mainstream was still pushing the propaganda that the decision is not popular until the Washington Post came out admitting the reality.

As a matter of fact, the Post not only reported that the decision was “quite popular,” but also explained that the data shows that “even Black Americans are unlikely to strongly object” to the ruling.

The data includes at least two major polls, among which are a new Economist/YouGov poll that showed that 59% of Americans approved of the ruling while just 27% disapproved and an ABC News poll that found Americans approve of the decision by a 20-point margin over those who dislike it.

However, the most “striking” thing about the data for the author of the article was the fact that black Americans approve of the ruling, too.

“What’s particularly striking about the Economist/YouGov poll is how Black Americans responded. Indeed, more of them actually approved of the decision (more than 4 in 10) than disapproved (fewer than 4 in 10). And more Black Americans “strongly” approved (31 percent) than disapproved (26 percent),” the Post wrote.

“This finding is also in line with previous polling. While polls have long shown Black Americans in favor of affirmative action, The Washington Post-Schar School poll showed nearly half (47 percent) supported banning the use of race and ethnicity in admissions.”

The author tried to explain black Americans disapproving of affirmative action by attributing it to a “lack of a perceived personal connection to the policy.”

“This vision of meeting social racism with government-imposed racism is thus self-defeating, resulting in a never-ending cycle of victimization,” Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the last week’s opinion.

“In the wake of the Civil War, the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment charted a way out: a colorblind Constitution that requires the government to, at long last, put aside its citizens’ skin color and focus on their individual achievements.”

America to Give Ukraine Cluster-Bombs

(Headline USA) Joe Biden announced that America will provide cluster munitions to Ukraine on Friday.

The decision comes on the eve of the NATO summit in Lithuania, where Biden is likely to face questions from allies on why the U.S. would send a weapon into Ukraine that more than two-thirds of alliance members have banned because it has a track record for causing many civilian casualties.

The move was met with divided reactions from Congress, as some criticized the plan while some backed it.

The munitions — which are bombs that open in the air and release scores of smaller bomblets — are seen by the U.S. as a way to get Kyiv critically needed ammunition to help bolster its offensive and push through Russian front lines. U.S. leaders debated the thorny issue for months, before Biden made the final decision this week.

U.S. national security adviser Jake Sullivan said the U.S. will send a version of the munition that has a reduced “dud rate,” meaning fewer of the smaller bomblets fail to explode. The unexploded rounds, which often litter battlefields and populated civilian areas, cause unintended deaths. U.S. officials have said Washington will provide thousands of the rounds, but provided no specific numbers.

“We recognize the cluster munitions create a risk of civilian harm from unexploded ordnance,” Sullivan told a White House briefing. “This is why we’ve deferred the decision for as long as we could.”

Marta Hurtado, speaking for the U.N. human rights office, said Friday “the use of such munitions should stop immediately and not be used in any place.”

U.N. deputy spokesman Farhan Haq said Secretary-General Antonio Guterres “wants countries to abide by the terms of that convention and so as a result, of course, he does not want there to be continued use of cluster munitions on the battlefield.”

Colin Kahl said the key reason to provide the bombs is to keep Ukraine in the fight.

“Things are going a little slower than some had hoped,” Kahl said in a Pentagon briefing. “So this is to make sure that the Ukrainians have the confidence that they have what they need. But frankly, also that the Russians know that the Ukrainians are going to stay in the game.”

Congressional reactions were mixed. Rep. Betty McCollum, D-Minn., called the decision “unnecessary and a terrible mistake.” And Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., said the civilian risk lingers “often long after a conflict is over.” Meanwhile, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, backed the move, saying Ukraine needs access to weapons Russia already is using.

According to the International Committee of the Red Cross, some cluster munitions leave behind bomblets that have a high rate of failure to explode — up to 40% in some cases.

A convention banning the use of cluster bombs has been joined by more than 120 countries that agreed not to use, produce, transfer or stockpile the weapons and to clear them after they’ve been used. The United States, Russia and Ukraine are among those who have not signed on.

The cluster munitions are included in a new $800 million package of military aid the U.S. will send to Ukraine.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Woman Guilty of Killing, Burning and Burying Her Grandchild

(Headline USA) A Nebraska woman was found guilty of illegally giving her daughter an abortion, then burning and burying the corpse of her grandchild.

Under a plea agreement, Jessica Burgess, 42, of Norfolk, admitted to providing an abortion after 20 weeks of gestation, false reporting and tampering with human skeletal remains. Charges of concealing the death of another person and abortion by someone other than a licensed physician were dismissed.

Burgess was accused of helping her then-17-year-old daughter, Celeste Burgess, kill her child, Jessica’s grandchild. Madison County District Court documents show she ordered abortion pills on the internet.

After the teen killed her baby, the two burned the remains and buried them in a field north of Norfolk in northeastern Nebraska. Authorities later found the burned baby.

Madison County Attorney Joe Smith has said it’s the first time he has charged anyone with illegally performing an abortion after 20 weeks, a restriction that was passed in 2010. In May, Republican Gov. Jim Pillen signed a 12-week abortion ban,

Jessica Burgess is set for sentencing Sept. 22. Two of the counts against her are felonies; one is a misdemeanor.

Celeste Burgess, now 18, was charged as an adult and pleaded guilty in May to removing, concealing or abandoning a dead body. She is scheduled to be sentenced July 20. She faces up to two years in prison.

Via Facebook messages, the two discussed killing the baby and plans to destroy the evidence. The messages, which law enforcement acquired using a search warrant, were detailed in court documents.

According to the documents, the daughter talked in the messages “about how she can’t wait to get the ‘thing’ out of her body.” She also said “I will finally be able to wear jeans.”

In one message, Jessica Burgess told her daughter she had obtained the pills and gave her instructions on how to end her pregnancy.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

45% of U.S. Drinking Water Causes Infertility, Cancer, Hormone Issues

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) It was discovered in a Wednesday study by the U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] that harmful per- and polyfluorene alkyl substances [PFAS] are estimated to contaminate at least 45% of drinking water in the United States, concentrating near urban areas.

PFAS are synthetic chemicals that are used in many items used by people, like non-stick pans, fire extinguisher foam, food packaging products that are grease resistant and more, the Post Millennial reported. They are commonly referred to as “forever chemicals” because it takes a long time for them to break down.

USGS tested 716 different locations across the United States and found that about 75% of tap water in urban areas and 25% in rural areas contain PFAS. There are over 12,000 types of PFAS, but the study tested only 32 of them because not all types can yet be detected with current tests. The Great Plains, the Great Lakes, the Eastern Seaboard, and Central and Southern California are the areas with higher concentrations of the chemicals.

“USGS scientists tested water collected directly from people’s kitchen sinks across the nation, providing the most comprehensive study to date on PFAS in tap water from both private wells and public supplies,” the study’s lead author, hydrologist Kelly Smalling, said.

“The study estimates that at least one type of PFAS – of those that were monitored – could be present in nearly half of the tap water in the U.S. Furthermore, PFAS concentrations were similar between public supplies and private wells.”

Additionally, the US Environmental Protection Agency reported that most people in the country have been exposed to PFAS which may lead to a variety of health complications such as a decrease in fertility, developmental effects in children, an increased risk of some cancers, an increase in cholesterol levels and possible issues with the body’s natural hormones.

The agency developed several action plans to reduce PFAS exposure in the country like using $2 billion from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law passed in February to promote access to clean drinking water in “disadvantaged” communities.

Judge Issues Warning a Year After Proclaiming an Invasion

(, The Center Square) – Terrell County Judge Dale Carruthers, who was sworn into office on the same day as President Joe Biden, says her life and the lives of her residents haven’t been the same since.

A life-long Democrat, she switched parties to become a Republican last year after she was one of the first judges in Texas history to declare an invasion at the southern border and in her county on July 5, 2022.

One year later, she spoke to The Center Square in an exclusive interview about the impacts of what she says are President Joe Biden’s “open border policies” upending her county.

“It’s been 2.5 years, from day one we’ve been at it,” she said. “If we didn’t have Operation Lone Star, we’d be in a world of hurt,” referring to the border security mission Texas Gov. Greg Abbott launched in March 2021.

Her county of slightly more than 700 residents is primarily impacted by crime committed by gotaways – the term U.S. Customs and Border Patrol uses for foreign nationals who illegally enter Texas from Mexico intentionally seeking to evade capture from Border Patrol and law enforcement officials.

“This is who is coming through, large groups” of mostly single military age men, she said. As family units arrive at ports of entry, cartel “runners, traffickers, and smugglers come through Terrell County.” Some are single women, she says, but they’re all wearing camouflage.

They’re trespassing, breaking and entering, stealing, “smuggling people, exploiting people, kidnapping children, selling women and men into slave trade. If that doesn’t frighten you, nothing will.”

The gotaways are “carrying drugs the entire time,” she said. “The boys they kidnap are mules.” Other crimes follow, and “after that, Americans start dying.”

“We warned you,” she says to the American people. “We weren’t crying wolf, we’re crying coyote,” referring to Mexican scouts who guide people into the U.S. illegally.

“We are telling you the Mexican cartels are here,” she said.

Under Abbott’s Operation Lone Star, increased numbers of Texas DPS troopers, Texas Rangers, game wardens, National Guardsmen and others are working with the county’s small sheriff’s office to interdict cartel-driven crime. The gotaways are “evading the law, coming in for the wrong reason. There’s always a crime behind it,” she said, almost always involving human smuggling.

Multiple daily high speed pursuits in the small town of Sanderson, the county seat, have “became the norm,” she said. “That should not be the norm.”

On the morning she spoke to The Center Square, there were two high speed pursuits.

In a neighboring smaller town, a shop keeper is “living in fear,” she said, and sleeping in the shop to make sure no one breaks in. “They shouldn’t be living like this. It’s like that on a daily basis.”

Ranchers, who find backpacks on their property left by gotaways, are warned not to touch them “because it could have fentanyl on it and kill you,” she said. Prior to declaring an invasion last year, certain concepts weren’t a “part of our vocabulary.”

“You can’t replace your child,” she said, referring to the amount of fentanyl increasingly being brought in. “If they get past us, they’re already in your neighborhood,” referring to the gotaways bringing in fentanyl and other drugs.

“Now fentanyl is everywhere. People think, ‘it won’t happen to me.’ I hope it never does but this year was worse than last year,” she said.

“The schools shouldn’t have to put up barricades” as a way to protect them from vehicle crashes from high-speed pursuits, she said. “No school should be on lockdown because of people illegally entering this country.

“We are not going to sacrifice our children to this. Why should any city in this entire United States?””

“We warned everyone a year ago and it’s only gotten worse. We can do everything in our power to inform you. We aren’t alarmists. We’re trying to let you know what we’re dealing with,” she said to the American people.

“They’re coming to your town,” she said, referring to criminal gotaways, “and your residents will be just as angry as my residents are.

“Don’t turn a blind eye. Don’t deny calling this an invasion. Any other country would call this an invasion. Declaring an invasion had to be done.”

Targeting Trump with Political Investigations Cost Taxpayers Over $41 Million

(Headline USA) Jack Smith‘s phony investigations of President Donald Trump have cost more than $9 million over the first several months, according to documents released Friday.

The special counsel’s office spent more than $5.4 million on things like employees’ salaries, travel and transportation, rent, supplies and materials from Smith’s appointment by Attorney General Merrick Garland in November 2022 through the end of March, Justice Department statement of expenditures show.

Justice Department agencies spent another $3.8 million to support the special counsel.

Those expenses include the cost of the protective details for the special counsel’s office as well as hours worked by agents and analysts on the probes.

President Trump was indicted last month on politically motivated charges.

Trump and his valet, Walt Nauta — who was charged alongside President Trump— have both pleaded not guilty.

Trump has denied any wrongdoing and slammed the prosecution as an attempt to hurt his bid to reclaim the White House in 2024.

In addition, Robert Mueller‘s investigation into whether the 2016 Trump campaign had colluded with Russia to tilt the outcome of the election in his favor cost roughly $32 million, according to Justice Department documents.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press