Arizona Dems Plot Lawfare Sabotage of Third-Party No Labels

(Headline USA) It didn’t take long for Democrats to hit the panic button after Rep. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., hinted at launching a third-party presidential bid.

The Arizona Democratic Party is looking to force new political party No Labels to disclose its donors or lose its status as a political party, an escalation of Democrats’ efforts to block a group they worry will boost Donald Trump’s chances of returning to the White House.

The election meddling would not be new for Democrats, who used the party’s preferred lawfare hitman Marc Elias in an attempt to similarly disrupt balloting last year in North Carolina. Elias led a move that tried to thwart the Green Party’s efforts to place a U.S. Senate candidate on the ballot.

Elias, the architect behind the infamous Steele Dossier, also has helped Democrat efforts to boot third-party candidates in Montana, Wisconsin and New York. In 2020, Elias’s fingerprints also tainted the plot to force Kanye West off the ballot, for fear his candidacy would eat into the party’s black voting base.

Arizona Democrats filed a complaint Thursday with Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, a Democrat who angered some in his party earlier this year when he formally recognized No Labels as a political party in the state. The complaint asks Fontes to suspend the nascent party until it discloses its donors.

No Labels says it is seeking ballot access in many states and will run a bipartisan “unity ticket” for president “if the two parties select unreasonably divisive presidential nominees.” The party has also secured ballot access in Alaska, Colorado and Oregon.

Democrats and anti-Trump Republicans worry a No Labels candidate couldn’t win but would tip the scales in favor of Trump or a Trump-like Republican. Arizona is a crucial battleground state, where Democrat Joe Biden reportedly beat Trump in 2020 by less than half of a percentage point. Biden allegedly won two other states by less than one percentage point.

The group plans to release an agenda for a potential 2024 presidential ticket next week in New Hampshire with Manchin and former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, a Republican. The duo, who’ve both carved out centrist positions within their parties, is a potential White House ticket for the party.

No Labels officials say their own research suggests they pull support equally from the two major parties, and they won’t field a ticket unless they believe it has a viable path to victory.

“No Labels has followed every law, but the Arizona Democratic party continues its hypocritical crusade to suppress competition and voter choice,” No Labels National Co-Chair Benjamin Chavis Jr. said in a statement. “As an American, and a lifelong Democrat, I am outraged.”

A spokesperson for Fontes declined to comment.

Roy Herrera, a lawyer for the Arizona Democratic Party, argues in the complaint that No Labels should have registered with the secretary of state as a political action committee but did not during the nearly yearlong process of organizing a political party.

He also argues the new party should be required to disclose the donors who paid for the signature gathering to secure ballot access, or at least the expenses incurred since being recognized as a party.

“Nobody should be exempt from the law, especially not an out of state dark money group,” Morgan Dick, executive director of the Arizona Democratic Party, said in a statement. “Arizonans deserve better and voters deserve to know who is behind this shadowy organization and what potentially nefarious agenda they are pushing.”

The Arizona Democratic Party has also filed a lawsuit seeking to block the recognition of No Labels, arguing there were deficiencies in the paperwork the group filed. Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Katherine Cooper sounded skeptical of the Democrat arguments during a hearing on Tuesday but did not say which way she would rule.

About 7,000 voters in the state’s two largest counties, which comprise 75% of all voters in the state, have registered with the No Labels Party since it was recognized in March. Statewide figures are compiled quarterly and were not yet available.

No Labels is one of four recognized political parties in Arizona, joining the Democrat, Republican and Libertarian parties. The state stopped recognizing the Green Party after the 2018 election, when it failed to get at least 5% of the vote in the election for governor and didn’t collect enough signatures to maintain its status.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Hollywood Goes on Strike as ‘Sound of Freedom’ Soars in Success

(Headline USA) In the wake of the stunning blockbuster debut of indie filmmaker Angel Studios’ Sound of Freedom, leaders of Hollywood’s actors’ union voted Thursday to join screenwriters in the first joint strike in more than six decades, shutting down production across the entertainment industry after talks for a new contract with studios and streaming services broke down.

It’s the first time two major Hollywood unions have been on strike at the same time since 1960, when Ronald Reagan was the actors’ guild president.

In an impassioned speech as the strike, which begins at midnight, was announced, actors’ union president and former The Nanny star Fran Drescher chastised industry executives.

“Employers make Wall Street and greed their priority and they forget about the essential contributors that make the machine run,” Drescher said. “It is disgusting. Shame on them. They stand on the wrong side of history.”

Hours earlier, a three-year contract had expired and talks broke off between the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers representing employers including Disney, Netflix, Amazon and others.

Outside Netflix’s Hollywood offices, picketing screenwriters chanted “Pay Your Actors!” immediately after the strike was declared. Actors will begin picketing alongside writers outside studio headquarters in New York and Los Angeles on Friday.

“It looks like it’s time to take down the MASKS. And pick up the SIGNS,” Oscar-winner Jamie Lee Curtis said in an Instagram post with a photo of the tragic and comic masks that represent acting.

The premiere of Christopher Nolan’s film Oppenheimer in London was moved up an hour so that the cast could walk the red carpet before the SAG board’s announcement. Stars including Cillian Murphy, Emily Blunt and Matt Damon left the event once the strike was announced.

The strike — the first for film and television actors since 1980 — casts a shadow over the upcoming 75th Emmy Awards, whose nominations were announced a day earlier. Union rules prevent actors from doing any interviews or promotions around the awards, and they may not appear at the ceremony.

The strike rules also prevent actors from making personal appearances or promoting their work on podcasts or at premieres. And they are barred from do any production work including auditions, readings, rehearsals or voiceovers along with actual shooting.

While international shoots technically can continue, the stoppage among U.S.-based writers and performers is likely to have a drag on those too.

Disney chief Bob Iger warned the strike would have a “very damaging effect on the whole industry.”

“This is the worst time in the world to add to that disruption,” Iger said on CNBC. “There’s a level of expectation that they have that is just not realistic.”

Disney was put to shame earlier this month when Sound of Freedom trounced its much-hyped Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny at the box office. The indie-produced movie, which leans heavily on conservative and Christian themes, has continued to soar in popularity despite efforts to sidetrack its success.

On the Hollywood strike, a nearly two-week extension of the actors union contract, and negotiations, only heightened the hostility between the two groups. Drescher said the extension made us “feel like we’d been duped, like maybe it was just to let studios promote their summer movies for another 12 days.”

Before the talks began June 7, the 65,000 actors who cast ballots voted overwhelmingly for union leaders to send them into a strike, as the Writers Guild of America did when their deal expired more than two months ago.

When the initial deadline approached in late June, more than 1,000 members of the union, including Meryl Streep, Jennifer Lawrence and Bob Odenkirk, added their names to a letter signaling to leaders their willingness to strike.

While famous names predominate, the strike also includes tens of thousands of little-known actors who scramble for small parts at sometimes meager pay. The union says modest-but-essential income streams including long-term residuals for shows they appear in have dried up.

The AMPTP said it presented a generous deal that included the biggest bump in minimum pay in 35 years, higher caps on pension and health contributions, and “a groundbreaking AI proposal that protects actors’ digital likenesses.”

“A strike is certainly not the outcome we hoped for as studios cannot operate without the performers that bring our TV shows and films to life,” the group said in a statement. “The Union has regrettably chosen a path that will lead to financial hardship for countless thousands of people who depend on the industry.”

SAG-AFTRA represents more than 160,000 screen actors, broadcast journalists, announcers, hosts and stunt performers. The walkout affects only the union’s actors from television and film productions, who voted overwhelmingly to authorize their leaders to call a strike before talks began on June 7. Broadway actors said in a statement that they stand “in solidarity” with SAG-AFTRA workers.

The 11,500 members of the Writers Guild of America have been on strike since their own talks collapsed and their contract expired on May 2. The stoppage has showed no signs of a solution, with no negotiations even planned.

That strike brought the immediate shutdown of late-night talk shows and Saturday Night Live, and several scripted shows, including Stranger Things on Netflix, Hacks on Max, and Family Guy on Fox, which have either had their writers’ rooms or their production paused. Many more are sure to follow them now that performers have been pulled too.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Kerry Fudges Truth on Private-Jet Ownership at House Hearing

(Headline USA) In between jaunts to London and Beijing, White House climate czar John Kerry had a layover in Washington, D.C., where he testily denied ever having owned a private jet, despite evidence to the contrary, during a hearing of the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s oversight subcommittee.

Fireworks broke out after Rep. Cory Mills, R-Fla., told the failed presidential candidate and longtime senator he hoped “it wasn’t too problematic for your operational team and your private jet to get here.”

Kerry exploded, calling it “one of the most outrageously persistent lies that I hear, which is this private jet.”

“I don’t own a private jet. I personally have never owned a private jet,” Kerry claimed, adding that it was “pretty stupid” to talk about coming to Capitol Hill by private jet from his office at the State Department.

He further claimed, falsely, that in his 2½ years as climate envoy he had flown entirely on commercial air, with the exception of five military flights, and recalled no flights on private jets in that time.

Kerry is the second husband of Teresa Heinz Kerry, who previously had been wed to Sen. John Heinz, R-Pa., the heir to the well-known ketchup brand. When he perished in a 1991 plane crash, his widow inherited his fortune, now estimated to be worth some $800 million.

According to Fox News, John Kerry had a $1 million stake in a family-owned charter company, Flying Squirrel LLC, which owned a a Gulfstream GIV-SP.

Since President Joe Biden was sworn into office, Kerry made a total of 48 trips lasting more than 60 hours and emitted an estimated 715,886 pounds, or 325 metric tons, of carbon on flights using the family jet.

According to online estimates, the average lifetime carbon footprint for Americans is around 20 metric tons—which is considerably higher than the global average of around 4 metric tons. It is unclear how much Kerry is personally driving up the average.

During Thursday’s hearing, Kerry claimed that the jet, belonging primarily to his wife, had been sold, but he did not say when.

Kerry also defended his negotiations with China ahead of meetings with his counterpart, Xie Zhenhua.

The questioning in Thursday’s hearing by the Republican-led committee at times broke down into challenging the existence of climate change and openly insulting the former secretary of state, a longtime target of conservative ridicule due to his penchant for hypocrisy, waffling and self-serving elitism while spending decades as a public servant.

In the most heated confrontation, Republican Rep. Scott Perry accused Kerry of drumming up a “problem that doesn’t exist” in global warming.

When Kerry asked why the world’s scientists and the 195 global governments behind the Paris climate accord would make up global warming, Perry responded, “Because they’re grifting, like you are,” drawing gasps from some fellow lawmakers.

Much of Thursday’s criticism from GOP committee members, however, zeroed in on the appropriateness of the U.S. engaging in climate negotiations with China, an increasingly hostile geopolitical adversary.

They cited China’s record of human rights abuses and what lawmakers described as China’s evasiveness in refusing to make bigger cuts in climate-damaging fossil fuel emissions.

“They’re not an honest broker when it comes to addressing emissions. They fire a coal plant up pretty much every day, if not week,” said Republican Rep. Michael McCaul, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee.

Republican lawmakers scoffed at China’s insistence that it was still a developing economy and should not be held to the same climate standards as developed Western economies, as well as criticizing China’s suspected use of forced labor of ethnic minorities in making solar panel components.

Kerry responded that the clear disparity between China’s claims and the size of its economy as the world’s second biggest could not be allowed to deadlock global progress on cutting emissions.

And as far as persuading China to hold itself to the same emissions-cutting requirements facing other big economies, “let me just be frank with you, that’s not going to happen in this visit,” he admitted.

“But the Chinese government understands this is a growing issue of concern,” he claimed.

Kerry will be the third senior Biden administration official in recent weeks to travel to China for meetings with their counterparts there, after Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen.

Both drew harsh criticism for failing to confront the trans-Pacific rival on the most pressing issues, including its efforts to create an alternative global-reserve currency that would significantly destabilize the U.S. dollar. Yellen dismissed concerns over the action and was seen repeatedly bowing to Chinese dictator Xi Jinping.

China broke off some mid- and high-level contacts with the Biden administration, including over climate issues, to show its anger with then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s August trip to Taiwan, which it considers to be a Chinese territory.

Other problems have rocked relations since then, including the transit across the U.S. of a Chinese spy balloon.

A stroke suffered by Xie, China’s top climate diplomat, also helped stall U.S.–China climate discussions.

The Biden administration’s aim with Beijing now is to achieve “stability, if we can, without conceding anything,” Kerry told lawmakers.

“What we’re trying to do is find ways we can cooperate to actually address the crisis” of climate, Kerry said, adding that China “is critical to our being able to solve this problem.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Mass. Dems Move to Allow Foreign Nationals to Vote in Elections

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) State level lawmakers in Massachusetts filed several bills proposing that foreign nationals receive the right to vote in municipal elections.

If passed, the bill would allow green card holders to vote in mayoral elections, school committee races, city and town council campaigns, board of selectmen, select board elections, school committee referendums and local ballot referendums, according to Breitbart.

Democrat state legislators James Eldridge, Samantha Montaño and Mike Connolly all sponsored the bills.

The House and Senate committees on election laws reviewed the bills in several different hearings.

“Immigrants are essential to our communities… many are on the path to citizenship but lack the ability to apply, but they need to have a say in how public services are funded and governed,” Vanessa Snow, director of policy and organizing for MassVOTE, said in a hearing on the bills.

MassVOTE also argued for 16-years-old to become the minimum voting age.

Democrats in Massachusetts also fought to give illegal immigrants driver’s licenses via the Work and Family Mobility Act, despite former Republican Gov. Charlie Baker’s attempt to veto the bill.

“This license we’re talking about is not a privilege-to-drive card, which is what they have in a bunch of other states,” Baker said on Boston Public Radio. “It looks exactly like a Massachusetts driver’s license—you can’t tell the difference between this and a regular one.”

Democrats held a special session to overrule the veto, allowing the bill to become law before the end of the year.

They also claimed they only wanted to implement the law so parents could safely pick up their children from school and run errands.

The state has an estimated 85,000 illegals with the potential to receive a license.

Representatives originally estimated that the project would cost $10,000—a price tag that ballooned to nearly $30 million before the bill became law.

‘Star of Death’: Costco Signals It Will No Longer Carry Bud Light

(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) Bud Light’s share of the market has plummeted after it made a transgender diva the face of its brand, and now some Costco locations are signaling that they will not restock the once iconic brew brand.

Bud Light has received the Costco “star of death,” according to RedState.

The star of death is an asterisk on a product’s price tag, which indicates the store’s intention to not restock the product.

SHARKINTHEWATER, an anonymous account, posted photographs of Bud Light’s death star to Twitter.

Bryan Henderson, a Twitter user that reports living in Phoenix, Ariz., also posted a picture of Bud Light bearing Costco’s death star, this one in response to Bud Light’s July 4 advertisement.

Colleen, a Twitter user who reported living in California, posted a sign of Bud Light Platinum at a steep discount, which also bore the Costco death star.

The extent of Costco’s refusal to restock Bud Light is not currently apparent. The locations of the posted pictures were not disclosed, and it is not clear if all Bud Light products, or only those photographed, are not being restocked.

The Washington Examiner reported reaching out to Costco for comment, but did not report a response by the retail giant.

Newsweek also reported reaching out to Costco for clarification, but did not publish a response from Costco.

Regardless of the scope of the drop, Bud Light is facing an unprecedented decline in popularity:

  • As of this month, Bud Light is no longer in the top ten preferred beer brands, according to Yahoo!
  • In June, Bud Light’s popularity dropped so much that it lost its position as the number one selling beer in America, a position it held for 20 years.
  • This drop in popularity comes despite Bud Light literally offering its beer for free, with vouchers covering 100% of the cost of beer in May.
  • The drop also comes amidst a desperate attempt by Bud Light to recapture its former customers, including producing camouflaged cans, donating to Veteran’s organizations, and a return to its previously beloved advertisement campaigns.

Wray Faces Questions over FBI’s Alleged Bias, FISA Abuse

(By Casey Harper, The Center Square) FBI Director Christopher Wray faced questions from Republicans lawmakers Wednesday over the federal law enforcement agency’s alleged bias against conservatives and Republicans.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, kicked off the hearing by blasting the FBI, laying out several instances of alleged bias, including the FBI’s role in cautioning social media companies to censor certain COVID-19 viewpoints as well as the Hunter Biden laptop story weeks before the presidential election.

“American speech is censored, parents are called terrorists, Catholics are called radicals, and I haven’t even talked about the spying that took place of a presidential campaign or the raiding of a former president’s home,” Jordan said at the hearing. “But maybe what’s more frightening is what happens if you come forward and tell Congress … you will be retaliated against.”

Jordan also pointed to U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty’s ruling from earlier this month demanding the White House and FBI stop pressuring social media companies to censor conservative speech, citing the First Amendment. Jordan cited this paragraph from the ruling to back his point:

“Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits in establishing that the government has used its power to silence the opposition. Opposition to COVID-19 vaccines, opposition to COVID-19 mask and lockdowns, opposition to the lab leak theory of COVID-19, opposition to the validity of the 2020 election, opposition to President Biden’s policies, statements that the Hunter Biden laptop was true, and opposition to policies of the government officials in power. All were suppressed. It is quite telling that each example or category of suppressed speech was conservative in nature.”

Wray pushed back against allegations of bias and defended the agency’s work.

“The idea that I am biased against conservatives seems somewhat insane to me given my own personal background,” said Wray, who is reportedly a registered Republican.

Democrats jumped to Wray’s defense as well.

“We don’t have a two-tiered system of justice,” said Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif. “We have one Department of Justice that goes after criminals regardless of party ideology.

“It is not the fault of the FBI that Donald Trump surrounded himself with criminals,” he added.

Critics have blasted the FBI for an array of alleged missteps, in particular the agency’s role in monitoring the campaign of former President Donald Trump and alleged rampant abuse of secret FISA warrants.

Former Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice John Durham testified earlier this year that the FBI had no real basis for its probe into Russian collusion with the Trump campaign.

Durham said “the FBI was too willing to accept and use politically funded and uncorroborated opposition research like the Steele Dossier.” That dossier became the foundation for the FBI’s investigation and monitoring of Trump’s campaign but was almost certainly a political document funded by the Clinton campaign.

The agency’s handling of the Jan. 6 protests in favor of Trump have raised eyebrows among critics as well who point out Black Lives Matter riots around the country were largely ignored while Jan. 6 rioters were tracked down.

A Government Accountability Office report published in February said the FBI and Capitol Police were aware of threats before Jan. 6 but did not do enough to address them.

One whistleblower, Steve Friend, a former FBI special agent who served five years on an FBI SWAT team and five years before that in local law enforcement in Georgia, testified before Congress in May alleging that the FBI manipulated Jan. 6 data to make domestic terrorism appear more widespread.

Friend said that the FBI’s National Security Branch “has refocused counterterrorism from legitimate foreign actors to political opponents within our borders.”

In response to those allegations, an FBI spokesperson told The Center Square that the agency “has not and will not retaliate against individuals who make protected whistleblower disclosures.”

“While the crimes at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, occurred in Washington, D.C., the reality is many of the people who committed violent acts and other crimes that day traveled to the nation’s capital from multiple jurisdictions across the country,” the FBI said.

“The FBI investigates individuals who commit or intend to commit violence and other criminal activity that constitutes a federal crime or poses a threat to national security. We do not conduct investigations based on a person’s views. We are committed to upholding the constitutional rights of all Americans and will never open an investigation based solely on First Amendment activity.”

Senate Republicans: Biden ‘Created Largest Child Trafficking Ring in US History’

(By Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) U.S. Senate Republicans launched a video on Wednesday claiming that President Joe Biden has “created the largest child trafficking ring in U.S. history.”

The video quotes Republican senators at hearings expressing concern about the extraordinary number of unaccompanied minors being trafficked to and through the U.S. southern border. In one clip, U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, says “Biden does not care about the 300,000 plus unaccompanied children that have been placed with sponsors since he became president.”

In another, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, says, “the Biden administration has utterly failed to secure the border and has encouraged parents to send their minor alien children on dangerous trips to the United States unaccompanied. It’s failed to protect these children after they’ve been let into the United States.”

The video points to reports that reveal at least 85,000 children have gone missing because the federal agencies tasked with caring for them can’t account for where they are. After the children were smuggled into the U.S., the Biden administration released them to sponsors under the oversight of the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Health and Human Service’s Office of Refugee Resettlement.

The Biden administration says the children are coming to live with family members. But reports show many weren’t placed with family members or anyone else they knew.

Initial reports indicated more than 45,000 children, in just a few months evaluated in an Axios investigation, were missing by early 2022. Since then, that number has more than doubled. Unaccompanied minors using falsified papers have been working in meat processing plants, prompting federal investigations over alleged child labor law violations. They’ve also been involved in encouraging others to participate in organized crime at a public school by soliciting funds to pay their human smuggler, or coyote, who helped them illegally enter the U.S.

Last year, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis called for an investigation and asked the Florida Supreme Court to empanel a grand jury to investigate trafficking of children into Florida. It did, and the grand jury found the federal government’s management of unaccompanied children’s release and transport resulted in “facilitating the forced migration, sale, and abuse of foreign children.”

The process “exposes children to horrifying health conditions, constant criminal threat, labor and sex trafficking, robbery, rape and other experiences not done justice by mere words,” Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody said when announcing the findings in April. She also called on Congress to investigate and take action.

Since then, Congress has held several hearings, and clips from those hearings are highlighted in the Senate GOP video. The video also highlights information from New York Times investigations into child trafficking of children from the border.

In January, the New York Times reported that unaccompanied minors were placed with human traffickers by the Biden administration. In February, it reported “exploited” migrant children were working in “brutal jobs across the US” in violation of child labor laws. In August, it reported “the White House and federal agencies were repeatedly warned of risks” to children and the “warnings were either ignored or missed.”

Moody and many others have called on Congress to impeach Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, claiming he’s violated federal law, lied multiple times under oath before Congress, and is endangering American and unaccompanied children’s lives.

Border Patrol Union Vice President Art Del Cueto has also said that the majority of Border Patrol officers want Mayorkas impeached.

U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, says he’s written to the FBI asking it “to find out where the 80,000-plus children are that this administration has lost. They don’t know.

“The kids are in danger. The kids are in slavery. They are being exploited. And it should not happen in the United States of America.”

The Biden administration has maintained that the border is closed and that after the children are placed in homes with sponsors, HHS is no longer responsible for them.

While saying the border is closed, the administration created another parole program inviting millions more people from four countries to come to the U.S. to “unify families.” It did so after on May 31, it ended DNA testing to determine if family units were really family units arriving at the border. Border Patrol agents have told The Center Square the policy is incentivizing crime.

Prior to apprehensions declining last month between ports of entry and increasing at ports of entry, the Border Patrol union warned, “[Mexican] cartels are still running the border. That hasn’t changed. They control the flow of illegal aliens coming in. Period.”

Since Biden’s been in office, more than 8 million people have illegally entered the U.S. – totaling more than the individual populations of 38 states.

Climate Debate Devolves into Flatulence at RFK Jr. Banquet w/ NYC Media Elite

(Ben Sellers, Headline USA) The debate over climate has seen many revisions and updates over the course of more than 50 years.

Scientists have fluctuated, like the earth’s temperature itself, from panicmongering over global cooling to global warming to climate change—and have, in the process, torqued up the varying degrees of catatrophe, moving the goalposts as needed.

However, the climate debate may have devolved into its purest and most absolute form at an elite supper club on Manhattan’s Upper East Side Tuesday evening, when former Page Six gossip columnist turned literary agent Doug Dechert let out a loud, prolonged fart during a heated exchange on the topic.

Fittingly, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., scion to one of the Left’s great 20th century political dynasties, was there to bear witness.

Dechert, who is known for representing conservative writers in the precarious Manhattan literary scene, has nonetheless written admiringly of the Kennedy campaign, suggesting that he may personally support the darkhorse Democrat candidate’s 2024 run against President Joe Biden.

He was reportedly the host of the private dinner for 16, according to one of the guests in attendance, David Patrick Columbia, who wrote a relatively restrained account that made no mention of flatulence.

It was Dechert’s own former outlet, the New York Post‘s Page Six, that let leak the lurid details of the Italian family-style meal at Tony’s Di Napoli, with an extra side of scoreggia.

“The gaseous exchange—to which Page Six bore reluctant witness—began after a guest asked Kennedy, founder of the ecological organization Waterkeeper Alliance, about the environment,” wrote reporter Mara Siegler.

Dechert “became enraged and screamed at the top of his lungs: ‘The climate hoax!'” she continued.

That triggered octagenarian art critic Anthony Haden–Guest, “who appeared to have been sleeping happily for most of the dinner, [but] was roused by the abrupt rumpus,” Siegler wrote.

The longtime friend of Dechert reprimanded him and called him a “miserable blob.”

As the cross-table exchange grew more heated, Kennedy and his campaign manager, former presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich, gazed on stoically.

Yet, Haden–Guest appeared to be besting Dechert in the war of words, prompting what Siegler described as a “new rhetorical tack.”

The host “let rip a loud, prolonged fart while yelling, as if to underscore his point, ‘I’m farting!'” she reported.

It was unclear, Siegler noted, “whether Dechert was farting at Haden-Guest personally or at the very notion of global warming.”

On Wednesday, Dechert offered a formal statement of apology following Page Six’s inquiry: “I apologize for using my flatulence as a medium of public commentary in your presence.”

The site reported that he also asked to be referred to as either “gallivanting boulevardier” or “beer-fueled sex rocket.”

Haden–Guest, who has written for Rolling Stone and Vanity Fair, insisted he was not sleeping prior to the exchange but merely thinking.

He also told Page Six that despite having disavowed his three-decade relationship with Dechert during the heated encounter he “didn’t mean it” and was sure they “will talk again.”

Nonetheless, he underscored his believe that the entire drunken interaction was a bit “ridiculous”—before proceeding to attack Dechert’s climate skepticism anew.

“Doug said it was a hoax and scam,” he said. “A scam for who [sic]? Who is benefiting? That’s not a political thing, it’s a human existence thing.”

Although Haden–Guest claimed it was “unusual” for him to bicker publicly, “when it is preposterous and it’s a life-or-death issue with the planet, to treat it as a zany political thing is foolish.”

Ben Sellers is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/realbensellers.

Wired Magazine: Security Cameras Enable White Supremacist Vigilantism

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) According to a Wired Magazine report, security cameras–especially those affixed to doorbells–are emblematic of white supremacy and the attempts on the part of white people to defend themselves from would-be thieves.

Calling camera doorbells “dangerous to you, or to society in general,” Wired Magazine’s Adrienne So declared that cameras create a “troubling” relationship with law enforcement insofar as they encourage “vigilante” homeowners to confront criminals rather than calling the police.

Yet the most troubling discovery, So suggested, was that the doorbells–specifically those with stream-sharing features–drastically increase “the possibility of racial profiling.”

Security cameras, So added, “target certain groups for suspicion of crime based on skin color, ethnicity, religion, of the country of origin,” and in the meantime do not make anything safer.

For these two reasons, So concluded, people should ditch their smart doorbells in order to contribute to a more “just society.”

Though So’s woke concerns are unfounded, smart appliances, such as camera doorbells, tend to make oversight increasingly possible on the part of large corporations, which tend to partner with the federal government.

Last month, for example, a Baltimore, Maryland, man, Brandon Jackson, was locked out of numerous accounts after his Amazon doorbell accused him of racism.

Jackson, who is black, asked a delivery driver, “excuse me, may I help you?”

But instead he was met with charges of racism from the tech giant. His account access was only restored days later, after he offered Amazon numerous explanations.

Amazon spokeswoman Simone Griffin reassured customers that Amazon would be more proactive in accurately identifying racist comments in the future.

“In this case, we learned through our investigation that the customer did not act inappropriately, and we’re working directly with the customer to resolve their concerns while also looking at ways to prevent a similar situation from happening again.”

Montana Library Commission Votes to Cut Ties w/ Woke American Library Association

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) The Montana State Library Commission voted to stop working with the American Library Association, claiming that they could not cooperate with a group lead by a “Marxist.”

Five out of seven commissioners voted to discontinue their relationship with the ALA, the Daily Wire reported.

Commissioner Brian Rossmann voted “no,” claiming that the ceremonial role of ALA president was not worth abandoning the relationship altogether; Commissioner Peggy Taylor abstained.

The new president of the ALA, Emily Drabinski, previously described herself as a “Marxist lesbian” in a 2022 tweet, which several commissioners took issue with.

“l just cannot believe that a Marxist lesbian who believes that collective power is possible to build and can be wielded for a better world is the president-elect of @ALALibrary,” Drabinski tweeted after the election. “I am so excited for what we will do together. Solidarity!”

The ALA elected Drabinski in April 2022, but she did not officially take office until July of 2023.

Immediately following the MSLC vote, the commission wrote a letter to the ALA disclosing their prompt departure from the program.

“We ought not promote, celebrate or support what scripture condemns,” said Dana Gonzalez, who was in favor of withdrawing, before quoting several Bible verses.

The MSLC hosted a public comment period before the official vote, where many librarians from within the state came and stated their support for the withdrawal from the organization.

“I have watched my profession go from honorable to shameful,” said long-time librarian Richard Marx. “Libraries all over the country and within Montana have shifted from serving communities to serving power. I am in full awareness that the reason for this shift aligns with the new ALA president’s expertise in critical pedagogy.”

Marx specifically called out drag queen story hours as a negative influence on the state’s libraries and children.

The surprise withdrawal by an official state organization pleased several parents and Montanan librarians.

Over the last few years, the American Library Association attempted to levy their influence in local libraries to eliminate parental rights in helping decide which books were available for kids.

Recently, the ALA hosted an annual meeting in Chicago that invited dissident librarians, authors and teachers to read their favorite banned books aloud as an act of opposition against tyrannical parents who do not want their children exposed to indecent—or even pornographic—materials.