Illinois Appeals Court Considers Request to Toss Jussie Smollett Convictions

(Headline USA) Jussie Smollett’s drawn-out legal saga begins anew Tuesday when an Illinois appeals court will hear oral arguments that the former Empire actor’s convictions for staging a racist, homophobic attack against himself in 2019 and then lying about it to Chicago police should be tossed.

If the appeal before the Chicago-based First District Appellate Court fails, Smollett would have to finish a 150-day stint in jail that his trial judge ordered during his 2022 sentencing. Smollett spent just six days in jail before his release pending the outcome of the appeal. A ruling is expected to take several weeks.

Among a long list of arguments in the 76-page written appeal from Smollett’s lawyers is that his 2021 trial violated his Fifth Amendment protections against double jeopardy—being punished for the same crime twice.

It says he already performed community service and forfeited a $10,000 bond as part of a 2019 deal with the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office to drop the initial charges.

Smollett, who is black and gay, was the target of a racist justice system and people playing politics, Nenye Uche, one of his lawyers, told reporters last year. Uche criticized special prosecutor Dan Webb’s decision to press for new charges in 2020. He also called the trial judge’s sentence excessive for a low-level felony.

In the appeal, Smollett’s legal team says chief prosecutor Kim Foxx’s office used proper discretion to drop the original charges four years ago.

Others, however, have said Foxx was the one playing politics and that the corrupt, George Soros-funded prosecutor had no justification for the light sentencing other than Smollett’s celebrity and the intervention of powerful people including Tina Tchen, the former chief of staff for Michelle Obama.

It is suspected that Tchen—who went on to oversee the reorganization of the Southern Poverty Law Center into a radical leftist hate group—may have been part of a plan to engineer a large-scale race riot ahead of the 2020 election using Smollett’s prosecution as the linchpin, but that the crumbling of the hoax and the emergence of the George Floyd situation in Minneapolis rendered Smollett’s case politically useless.

Nonetheless, the actor has maintained his innocence, going to absurd lengths to continue casting himself as the victim.

“If Mr. Smollett’s convictions are allowed to stand, this case will set a dangerous precedent by giving prosecutors a second bite at the apple any time there is dissatisfaction with another prosecutor’s exercise of discretion,” the appeal says.

A 55-page response from the special prosecutor says the way the agreement with Foxx’s office was structured clearly left open the possibility of recharging Smollett without violating protections against double jeopardy.

“Smollett’s attacks on the validity of his prosecution are legally and factually unsupported,” it says.

In January 2019, during a bitterly cold day in Chicago, Smollett reported to police that he was the victim of a racist and homophobic attack by two men wearing ski masks. The manhunt for the attackers soon turned into an investigation of Smollett himself, leading to his arrest on charges that he’d orchestrated the attack himself.

Authorities said Smollett paid two men he knew from work on the TV show Empire to stage the attack. Prosecutors said he told them what racist and homophobic slurs to shout, and to yell that Smollett was in “MAGA Country,” a reference to the campaign slogan of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

A jury convicted Smollett in 2021 on five felony counts of disorderly conduct—the charge filed when a person lies to police. He was acquitted on a sixth count.

In 2022, Cook County Judge James Linn sentenced Smollett to 30 months of felony probation, with 150 days served in Cook County Jail, and ordered that he pay $120,106 in restitution to the city of Chicago and a $25,000 fine.

As he sentenced Smollett, Judge Linn excoriated him as a narcissist and pronounced himself astounded by Smollett’s actions given the actor’s multiracial family background and ties to social justice work.

During sentencing and as Smollett was led away to jail, he shouted that he was innocent, warning the judge that he was not suicidal and if he died in custody it was somebody else who would have taken his life.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

McCarthy Directs House Committees to Launch Impeachment Inquiry

(Headline USA) House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., directed the House’s committees this week to open a formal impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden over his role in his family’s foreign business dealings.

“House Republicans have uncovered serious and credible allegations into President Biden’s conduct. Taken together, these allegations paint a picture of a culture of corruption,” McCarthy said on Tuesday.

The president is facing “allegations of abuse of power, obstruction and corruption,” McCarthy added, noting that an impeachment inquiry is the “next logical step.”

“They warrant further investigation by the House of Representatives. That’s why today I am directing our House committees to open a formal impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden,” he said.

House Oversight Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., and Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, plan to give a presentation on Thursday to House Republicans outlining the case against Biden, according to reports. 

It is not clear whether they then plan to hold a formal House vote on the inquiry, which McCarthy said last month would be a requirement. A formal vote would require 218 lawmakers to support the inquiry, and it is not clear whether House Republicans would be able to reach that number, with several GOP lawmakers expressing skepticism about the move.

Senate Republicans have also tossed water on the idea.

“I don’t think they got enough time to do it,” Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., said on Tuesday. “I’m not for going through another damn trial to be honest with you. You better have an ironclad case. When you go after a former president or a president, have all of your ducks in a row.”

Conservatives in the House have also accused McCarthy of using the Biden investigation to distract from the upcoming appropriations bill deadline.

“Hiding behind impeachment to screw America with status quo massive funding … will not end well,” Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said.

Whistleblower: CIA Tried To Pay Off Analysts To Deny COVID Originated in Wuhan Lab

(Headline USA) The CIA attempted to pay off analysts in order to bury their findings on the origins of COVID-19, which tied the virus back to a lab in Wuhan, China, according to a whistleblower.

A senior-level CIA officer reportedly told the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic that at least six analysts informed the agency that COVID-19 likely originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The agency then attempted to bribe the analysts to change their positions and publicly say that COVID-19 originated naturally.

“According to the whistleblower, at the end of its review, six of the seven members of the Team believed the intelligence and science were sufficient to make a low confidence assessment that COVID-19 originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China,” Reps. Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, and Mike Turner, R-Ohio, wrote in a letter to CIA Director William Burns on Tuesday.

“The whistleblower further contends that to come to the eventual public determination of uncertainty, the other six members were given a significant monetary incentive to change their position,” the letter adds.

Wenstrup and Turner requested all documents, communications, and pay info from the CIA’s COVID Discovery Team by Sept. 26. They also asked for all communications between the CIA and other federal agencies, including the State Department, the FBI, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Energy Department.

In a statement, the CIA said the agency takes the allegations “very seriously.”

“At CIA we are committed to the highest standards of analytic rigor, integrity, and objectivity. We do not pay analysts to reach specific conclusions,” CIA Director of Public Affairs Tammy Kupperman Thorp said. “We take these allegations extremely seriously and are looking into them. We will keep our Congressional oversight committees appropriately informed.”

The FBI was the first federal agency to conclude that COVID-19 most likely spread as the result of a lab leak. The Energy Department later confirmed this finding.

Calif. Mayor Spanked w/ Paddle by Drag Queen Denies Children Were Present

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) California again set precedent for why the state has long been considered the hub of far-left activism, when Burbank Democrat Mayor Konstantine Anthony kicked it into overdrive and provided another reason many parents were leaving the progressive state to prevent their kids from being groomed. 

The act in question was recorded and posted to Instagram by the Wisenuts Podcast and reshared by Libs of TikTok, which created a media firestorm for the mayor who also approved of the pornographic book Gender Queer at Burbank schools.

Anthony was filmed playfully bent over and spanked by drag performer Foxxy Roxywood in front of children at the Santa Clarita Valley Democrats’ Drag Queen Bingo campaign event on Saturday, Fox News reported, sparking heated discussions on social media by conservatives. 

“Another day, another wildly inappropriate drag show…but wait! This one’s somehow worse,” Libs of TikTok wrote on Substack and on Twitter. “At a drag-themed fundraiser for a Democratic senate candidate in California, Burbank city mayor Konstantine Anthony got SPANKED by a drag queen. And kids were present.” 

What made things worse for the mayor was his jovial response in the video and reaction from concerned parents. 

The Burbank mayor responded, saying no children were present at the event, according to the Gateway Pundit and when called out on the original video’s comments section, Anthony’s response was flippant: “Jealous??” 

Meanwhile, the discussions on social media became heated when the age restriction for the event came into question. The mayor claimed that the event was a “private 21+ event” and that “no children were present.”

“Actually, there weren’t any children at this private 21+ event. But of course, lying is totally on brand for you,” responded Anthony, who was an improv comedian and actor before winning a seat on the Burbank City Council in 2020 and becoming mayor in 2022.

“So why does the advertisement say 15+?” Libs of TikTok rebutted. “You lied and you were caught. You lost all credibility. Hope the spanking was worth it bro.”

Anthony’s video came during a contentious time as parents in the state were battling for their parental rights after the California State Assembly passed AB 957, titled the Transgender, Gender-Diverse and Intersex Youth Empowerment Act on Friday.

The legislation was led by Democrats Sen. Scott Wiener and Democratic California Assembly Member Lori Wilson, who introduced the legislation in February and placed a spotlight on affirming a child’s gender identity, regardless of if parents objected to their child’s decision to identify with a gender that does not align with their biological sex.

Wisc. Lawmakers Threaten to Impeach Judge Who Campaigned on Gerrymandering

(Headline USA) Wisconsin Republicans have enjoyed outsize control of the Legislature in one of the most closely divided states for a dozen years, despite Democrats best lawfare efforts to overturn voters’ decisions at the ballot box. Upsetting that Republican hold is now at the heart of a drama involving the state Supreme Court that has national political implications.

A new leftist tilt to the court is driving Republican concerns of losing their large legislative majorities, which were built to reflect the will of the voters. Republicans have threatened to impeach the justice who was elected earlier this year and flipped the court to a 4-3 liberal majority, unless she withdraws from any case involving redistricting. The GOP is citing concerns about her campaign statements and fundraising, which she ran on promises judicial activism.

Democrat leaders have decried that threat as “political extortion” and are mobilizing voters to pressure Republicans in districts won by the new justice to back down.

“Impeachment is an act of pure power politics,” said Ben Wikler, chair of the Wisconsin Democratic Party, apparently forgetting his party’s partisan power play impeachments of former President Donald Trump. “It’s a desperate gambit to avoid accountability to voters who choose their state representatives, their state senators and their Supreme Court justices.”

Altering the makeup of the Wisconsin Supreme Court also holds the potential to affect the 2024 presidential election in the perennial battleground.

Four of the past six presidential contests in the state have been decided by less than a percentage point. In 2020, the state Supreme Court, then controlled 4-3 by conservatives, came within one vote of overturning Democrat Joe Biden’s alleged nearly 21,000 vote victory over Trump.

Wisconsin Republicans, who hold majorities of 64-35 in the state Assembly and 22-11 in the Senate, are squarely focused on their own futures. The political maps they drew that helped them win near veto-proof supermajorities are at risk of being overturned under the newly left-leaning Supreme Court.

Two lawsuits challenging the gerrymandered maps as unconstitutional were filed the first week after the new justice was seated. The Supreme Court has yet to decide whether it will take either case.

Republicans, and even Democrats the last time they had majority control of the Legislature 14 years ago, have resisted moves to give up their power to draw electoral district boundaries.

States that have shifted responsibility for redistricting from partisan legislatures to independent commissions generally have seen a reduction in gerrymandering, in which lines are drawn in a way that expands or cements one party’s grip on power. Districts drawn by independent commissions generally result in election outcomes more closely aligned with the will of voters.

Neighboring Michigan stands as a stark example of what can happen under independent redistricting.

Republican lawmakers, who then controlled Michigan’s redistricting process, drew maps after the 2010 census that gave them an enduring advantage for the next decade. In 2020, for example, Democrat legislative candidates received a slight majority of votes, yet Republicans won a 58-52 majority in the Michigan House and a 22-16 majority in the Senate under the maps they had drawn.

Unlike Wisconsin, Michigan allows its residents to propose their own laws or constitutional amendments and put those proposals on the ballot for a statewide vote. In 2018, voters approved an effort to take redistricting away from state lawmakers and give the task to an independent commission. That commission, which is instructed to be guided by allegedly “partisan fairness,” drew the current legislative and congressional maps after the 2020 census.

The 2022 midterm election was the first to use Michigan’s new districts, resulting in a flip of legislative control. Democrat legislative candidates received just under 51% of the total statewide votes, translating to a 56-54 House majority and a 20-18 Senate majority.

In Wisconsin, it is impossible to change the redistricting process unless lawmakers voluntarily relinquish their power. That’s because Wisconsin is among 26 states that do not allow citizens working with partisan lawfare groups to bypass their legislature through ballot initiatives.

While Republicans have used electoral maps that reflect voting patterns and public choice to maintain their large majorities in the Legislature, voters have elected Democrats to all but one of the statewide executive offices that are decided on a partisan basis, including governor and attorney general. Those efforts were fueled by widespread vote fraud in major blue cities during the 2020 election.

With no avenue for a public referendum and faced with Republican dominance in the Legislature, Wisconsin Democrats shifted their focus to winning a majority of seats on the state Supreme Court with the hope of overturning the maps through a legal challenge.

The election of Janet Protasiewicz in April delivered the long-sought majority on the state’s highest court that Democrats have fought to win back over the past 15 years.

Protasiewicz made her position on redistricting clear during the campaign, calling the GOP maps approved by the conservative-controlled state Supreme Court “unfair” and “rigged.” The Wisconsin Democratic Party donated nearly $10 million to her campaign. She won by 11 percentage points during an April election and took her seat in August.

Legislative Republicans immediately called on Protasiewicz to step aside from redistricting cases, citing her comments during the campaign and donations from the Democratic Party. She never said during the race how she would rule, and in the past week released a letter from the state commission that investigates complaints against judges that said it had dismissed ones related to her comments on redistricting.

Still, Vos continues to threaten impeachment. It is up to each justice to decide whether to recuse, and a Supreme Court rule adopted by conservative justices more than a decade ago explicitly allows justices to hear cases involving campaign donors. All but one of the current members of the court has taken money from political parties, but Republican lawmakers have voiced no complaints about conservative justices accepting money from the GOP.

Wisconsin Assembly Republican Majority Leader Tyler August dismissed the comparison this week.

“She has clearly prejudged the case,” he said of Protasiewicz. “We’re talking about this case, this justice, and I’ll leave it at that.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Mark Levin, Jen Psaki Get More Screen Time on MSNBC, Fox News

(Headline USA) Two cable news personalities from the complete opposite ends of the political spectrum — Mark Levin and Jen Psaki — are increasing their presence on television.

Psaki, former press secretary to President Joe Biden and current MSNBC host, is moving into prime-time for one night a week. The network said on Thursday that she will begin hosting the 8 p.m. Eastern hour on Monday nights.

Since switching to media, her Sunday afternoon show Inside with Jen Psaki has proven to be successful for the network. Currently, the 8 p.m. Monday slot is filled by a rotating series of guest hosts, with Chris Hayes working on Tuesday through Friday.

She’ll join Rachel Maddow, who also hosts once a week in prime-time for MSNBC on Mondays. Maddow’s show will air directly after Psaki. The new schedule starts on Sept. 25.

Levin, the radio talk host whose TV show Life, Liberty & Levin airs Sunday nights on Fox News Channel, will have an additional weekend hour on Saturdays, Fox said. It will air in the same 8 p.m. time slot on both weekend nights.

His show is the top-rated cable news program on Sunday nights, according to the Nielsen company.

In addition to his Fox duty, Levin hosts a syndicated weekday radio show that is heard on some 300 stations. His new Saturday show begins Sept. 16.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Minnesota Leftist Who Pushed to Defund Police Gets Tough on Crime after Carjacking

(Robert Jonathan, Headline USA) A high-ranking Minnesota Democrat Party official may be pushing for an increased law enforcement presence in her area after recently becoming a violent crime victim.

About three years ago, however, during the race riots and resulting social-justice reforms that followed the death of George Floyd, Shivanthi Sathanandan advocated for the dismantling of the Minneapolis Police Department.

Around that time, she also praised the Minneapolis school board for removing cops from public schools.

In a lengthy Facebook post last week, Sathanandan articulated a far different message in describing how she says she was carjacked in her own driveway in broad daylight in front of her kids by four armed men.

Attaching a selfie of her bloody face, Sathanandan, who is the second vice chair of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party explained on Facebook that she suffered a broken leg and lacerations on her head as well as other cuts and bruises in the beating.

“Look at my face. REMEMBER ME when you are thinking about supporting letting juveniles and young people out of custody to roam our streets instead of HOLDING THEM ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS,” she wrote in what amounted to a dramatic departure from Democrats’ official criminal-justice platform.

“… These criminals will not win,” she continued. “We need to take back our city. And this will not be the last you hear from me about this.”

The Democrat activist praised “incredible” police officers and others who responded and declared, in part, that “We need to get illegal guns off of our streets, catch these young people who are running wild creating chaos across our city and hold them in custody and prosecute them.”

According to Townhall senior writer Julio Rosas, someone is now encouraging police to keep a closer eye on her block, and the officers seemed less-than-enthusiastic about doing so because of the politician’s political agenda.

In another footnote to the original incident, Liz Collin, a reporter for Minnesota-based Alpha News, claimed that Sathanandan allegedly expressed dissatisfaction by complaining to Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey over what seemed to be a quick response time by the understaffed police.

Police bodycam footage has yet to released.

Cops subsequently recovered Sathanandan’s vehicle, which was abandoned by the perpetrators.

Sathanandan marks just the latest example of a radical leftist adopting what appeared to be far-right rhetoric after being personally impacted by the inevitable outcome of the Left’s poorly conceived policies.

In a simliar episode last week, New York City Mayor Eric Adams was accused of sounding eerily like former President Donald Trump for warning that the Biden adminstriation’s open-borders immigration policy would “destroy” the Big Apple.

A New York Post editorial on the Minnesota incident noted that the trend of bleeding-heart leftists getting a hearty dose of comeuppance has been happening since at least the era of erstwhile neocon Bill Kristol’s father:

“Yet maybe it’s a true revelation for her—a fresh instance of the late Irving Kristol’s famous quip, ‘A conservative is a liberal who’s been mugged.'”

The editorial also maintained that “Sathanandan’s sociopathic cries to abolish the [Minnesota Police Department] show just how utterly indifferent progs are to the suffering their favored policies cause. Until it hits them directly, of course.”

Smithsonian Claims Obama Wasn’t the ONLY Gay President

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Following a long tradition of reading past history via an LGBT lens, the Smithsonian Magazine speculated that American President James Buchanan might have been America’s first gay president, and not former President Barack Obama, as most believe.

Citing a letter written as an insult, the magazine suggested that Buchanan had some sort of romantic attachment to an Alabama man named William Rufus DeVane King.

According to the narrative, Buchanan’s lack of success with women, combined with King’s apparent lack of interest, signaled that the two friends likely engaged in some sort of homosexual affair.

The two friends lived together at one time, and exchanged various friendly letters with each other.

Though Smithsonian never outright claimed that Buchanan was gay, the article sought to explain why Americans are so desperate to transform the past into a more gay time.

“Centuries of repression of homosexuality in the United States has erased countless number of Americans from the story of LGBT history,” the article claimed.

“The dearth of clearly identifiable LGBT political leaders from the past, moreover, has yielded a necessary rethinking of the historical record and has inspired historians to ask important, searing questions,” causing Americans to interpret anyone who does not fit “into a normative pattern of heterosexual marriage” as “queer.”

The conclusion, the magazine noted, was reached by a “powerful force at work within historical scholarship: the search for a usable queer past.”

Despite the length of the article, it makes no mention of a more recent president who likely engaged in gay affairs: Barack Obama.

Recently, letters written by the former president were unveiled, revealing that he dreamed of having gay sex in letters to a former girlfriend.

In the wake of that shocking revelation, Larry Sinclair, one of Obama’s alleged gay lovers, interviewed with Tucker Carlson, detailing a sex- and cocaine-filled evening with Barack at a bar in Chicago in 1999.

The Obamas have not directly addressed the rumors.

Energy Secretary Granholm’s Electric Roadtrip Runs Into Problems

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm’s road trip to promote electric vehicles came to a sudden halt when a Georgia citizen called the cops after her team decided to block off an electric vehicle charger.

The original purpose of Granholm’s four-day journey was to show Americans the wonders of electric vehicles; however, her advance team parked their gas-powered vehicle at the electric charging station ahead of time to save her spot, blocking a family on a “sweltering day,” according to Breitbart.

One of the four charging stations in Grovetown, Georgia, broke and the other two hosted occupants, leaving one for the secretary. The family who called the police were traveling with their baby in the summer heat.

The sheriff’s office said they could not do anything, but Granholm’s team scrambled to appease the waiting family by sending the cars in their fleet to slower charging stations.

Reports indicate that there are an average of three electric vehicle charging ports for every 10,000 people in America.

“It’s just par for the course,” said John Ryan, a driver of an electric BMW who then had to wait for the family and Granholm to finish charging so he could get a spot. “They’ll get it together at some point.”

The inability of electric vehicle owners to access charging stations is a key issue among the group.

“The availability of public charging stations is still a critical obstacle, but it isn’t the only one. EV owners continue to have issues with many aspects of public charging, as the cost and speed of charging and the availability of things to do while waiting for their vehicle to charge are the least satisfying aspects,” said executive director of EV practice at JD Power Brent Gruber.

Gruber also claimed that the reliability of public chargers is low due to constant outages and maintenance needs.

Even NPR reporter Camilia Domonoske, who accompanied Granholm on her trip, admitted that while electric vehicles were convenient for her day-to-day life, out of the ordinary excursions such as road trips made life difficult.

“Riding along with Granholm, I came away with a major takeaway,” Domonoske wrote. “EVs that aren’t Teslas have a road trip problem, and the White House knows it’s urgent to solve this issue.”

Alabama Asks SCOTUS Again to Block Lawfare Efforts to Thwart Election Integrity

(Headline USA) Alabama on Monday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to let it keep Republican-drawn congressional lines in place as the state continues to fight a court order to create a second district where black voters constitute a majority or close to it.

Despite losing at the Supreme Court earlier this year in the long-running redistricting case, Alabama is pursuing another appeal, hoping for a different result with the most recent GOP version of the map. Alabama asked the justices to stay a ruling issued last week by a three-judge panel that that blocked the use of the latest GOP-drawn districts in upcoming elections and directed a court-appointed special master to propose new lines for the state.

The judges, in their ruling, said Alabama lawmakers deliberately defied their directive to create a second majority-black district or something close to it, despite GOP districts being drawn based on voter choice and to avoid racially rigging elections.

The Alabama attorney general’s office asked justices to put the order on hold while the state appeals “so that millions of Alabama voters are not soon districted into that court-ordered racial gerrymander.”

“Race-based redistricting at the expense of traditional principles bears an uncomfortable resemblance to political apartheid,” the attorney general’s office wrote.

Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, chairman of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, which backed one of the court challenges in Alabama, wildly likened the state’s actions to that of former segregationist Gov. George Wallace who tried to stop black students from entering the University of Alabama in 1963.

“This is a shameful and arrogant continuation of a sordid history in Alabama that denies equal rights to black Alabamians, no matter how the United States Supreme Court rules,” said Holder, who along with lawfare gnome Marc Elias has been crisscrossing the country trying to disrupt electoral maps based on election outcomes and voter preference.

The Supreme Court in June upheld a three-judge panel’s finding that Alabama’s prior map — with one majority-black district out of seven in a state that is 27% black — likely violates the federal Voting Rights Act. The three judges said the state should have two districts where black voters have an opportunity to elect their preferred candidates.

Alabama lawmakers in July hastily passed a new map as a remedy. However, it maintained a single majority-black district and boosted the percentage of black voters in another district, District 2, from about 30% to nearly 40%. The three-judge panel on chided Alabama lawmakers for flouting their instruction. The panel directed a court-appointed special master to submit three proposed new maps by Sept. 25.

The state’s request to the Supreme Court comes after the three judges refused to put their order on hold as the state appeals. The judges said state voters should not have to endure another congressional election under an “unlawful map.”

“We repeat that we are deeply troubled that the State enacted a map that the Secretary readily admits does not provide the remedy we said federal law requires. And we are disturbed by the evidence that the State delayed remedial proceedings but did not even nurture the ambition to provide that required remedy,” the judges wrote Monday as they refused to stay their order.

Alabama’s hope for a reversal of fortune seems to at least partly hinge on persuading Justice Brett Kavanaugh to support the state’s side in the latest round. Kavanaugh did not join in all of the majority opinion.

Alabama’s court filing repeatedly cites Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion in the case this summer. He wrote that even if race-based redistricting was allowed under the Voting Rights Act for a period of time, that “the authority to conduct race-based redistricting cannot extend indefinitely into the future.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press