Quantcast
Sunday, December 22, 2024

9th Circuit Rejects Newsom’s Ban on Private Immigrant-Detention Facilities in Calif.

'It bars the Secretary from doing what federal immigration law explicitly permits him or her to do...'

(Headline USA) A federal appeals court on Tuesday tossed out California‘s ban on privately owned immigration detention facilities.

The ruling keeps intact a key piece of the world’s largest detention system for immigrants, even as America’s broken immigration system faces unprecedented assault under the Biden administration’s open-borders policies.

Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the ban into law in 2019, another measure to limit California’s cooperation with the federal government on immigration laws as then-President Donald Trump imposed genuine enforecement policies.

Under Newsom’s plan, privately run immigration jails were to be phased out by 2028.

A divided three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that the ban, Assembly Bill 32, interfered with the federal government’s authority to enforce the law.

“AB 32 cannot stand because it conflicts with this federal power and discretion given to the Secretary [of Homeland Security] in an area that remains in the exclusive realm of the federal government, and it bars the Secretary from doing what federal immigration law explicitly permits him or her to do,” wrote Judge Kenneth Lee, a Trump appointee.

Lee was joined by Bridget Bade, another Trump appointee. Judge Mary Murguia, an appointee of President Barack Obama, dissented.

The ruling is a victory for companies including The Geo Group Inc., which sued Newsom, and CoreCivic Inc. Both rely heavily on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement contracts and are a critical part of the agency’s detention system.

The court sent the case back to U.S. District Judge Janis Sammartino in San Diego for more consideration after overruling her decision to keep the law in effect during the legal challenge.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who sponsored the law banning private immigration detention when he was a state assemblyman, claimed the ban was key to achieving health and safety for all people and that the fight was personal to him, having come to the United States from the Philippines as an infant.

“While the road ahead may feel a little longer today, our work continues and we will keep pushing forward,” he said.

California, with its large immigrant population, has been a big part of ICE’s network.

Five of the agency’s eight immigration detention centers in California are run by private companies—in Adelanto, Bakersfield, Calexico, McFarland and San Diego.

In recent years, ICE has begun shifting detention centers to the South, especially Louisiana, partly because the political climate is more receptive.

ICE currently has about 24,000 people in its custody, well below its peak of more than 56,000 in 2019 but up sharply from last year, when Trump’s successful border security measures—along with efforts to prevent spread of COVID-19—curtailed capacity.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Copyright 2024. No part of this site may be reproduced in whole or in part in any manner other than RSS without the permission of the copyright owner. Distribution via RSS is subject to our RSS Terms of Service and is strictly enforced. To inquire about licensing our content, use the contact form at https://headlineusa.com/advertising.
- Advertisement -

TRENDING NOW

TRENDING NOW