Department of War Seeks $200 Billion to Fund Iran War

(Kyle Anzalone, Antiwar.com) The Department of War says it needs $200 billion in additional funds for the war against Iran. Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth suggested the number could go higher. 

According to a senior administration official speaking with The AP, the Department of War submitted the spending request to the White House. Congress will have to pass a supplemental military spending bill to authorize the funding. 

Democratic Representative Ro Khanna was quick to criticize the additional spending in a post on X. The Congressman argued that the money would be better spent on welfare programs. Several other Democrats came out against the proposal. 

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer did not directly denounce the potential bill, but did say that Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Hegseth must testify about the war. Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson endorsed supplemental funding for the Pentagon. 

He said, “Obviously, it’s a dangerous time in the world and we have to adequately fund defense, and we have a commitment to do that.” Johnson added that the Department of War would need to present Congress with a detailed proposal. 

Trump’s war against Iran appears to have a slim majority of support in the House and Senate. A War Powers Resolution aimed at forcing the President to end the conflict narrowly failed in both houses. 

At a press conference on Thursday, Hegseth said the number requested by the Pentagon could change. “As far as $200 billion, that number could move, obviously. It takes money to kill bad guys,” he explained. 

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.  

The Majority of Americans Believe War Against Iran Benefits Israel More Than US

(Kyle Anzalone, Antiwar.com) American voters say that a war against Iran benefits Israel more than the US.

A poll conducted by IMEU Policy Project and Demand Progress released on Thursday found that 56% of voters said the war “benefits Israel more.” Only 29% said the conflict “benefited the US more.”

Less than a fifth of Democrats and a quarter of independents said that the war benefits the US more. Even among Republican voters, more said that the Middle East conflicts benefit Israel more. 

IMEU also asked if Israel has too much influence over US politics. A plurality of all voters said Israel has too much influence. Just 4% said Israel had too little influence.  

Several polls have shown that the war against Iran is unpopular in the US. The war could hurt the GOP in the upcoming midterm elections. 51% of independents said they were less likely to vote for Republicans because of the conflict. Only 17% of independents said they would be more likely to vote for a Republican because President Donald Trump attacked Iran. 

However, to capitalize on Americans’ discontent with the war, Democrats will have to oppose US military support for Israel. IMEU found that in a hypothetical scenario where the Democrats and Republicans had the same position on Israel, the Republican candidate would win the race.

This article originally appeared at Antiwar.com.  

 

Poll: Kamala Harris Still Democratic Favorite for 2028

(Morgan Sweeney, The Center Square) Former vice president and 2024 presidential candidate Kamala Harris remains the clear Democratic favorite for the next presidential primary two years before the first votes are cast, according to the latest The Center Square Voters’ Voice Poll.

A national sampling of 1,152 Democrats and left-leaning independents were asked which of 13 prominent names in the Democratic Party they would support in the 2028 presidential primary, and 31% chose Harris. 

Harris’ numbers generally remain little changed from a similar October poll where respondents were asked to select from eight Democratic politicians, though her support among independent voters fell in this latest poll. The poll surveyed 934 Democrats and 218 independents that lean Democratic, with each group weighted to match that party’s national population. Harris was the top pick for 32% of Democrats and 18% of independents, while in October, she captured 33% of Democratic and 27% of independent respondents.

Harris also lost some support from female voters but gained some from male voters. Thirty percent of males surveyed chose Harris, compared to 28% in October, while 33% of females polled selected Harris, compared to 36% in October.

The former vice president was least supported among respondents age 65 and older, with only 17% indicating they would vote for her. California Gov. Gavin Newsom bested Harris with this group, securing 21%. 

As in October, however, the next-largest group of those surveyed — 18% of Democrats and 21% of independents — indicated they weren’t sure who they would choose. Otherwise, Newsom was the second-most popular candidate, with 16% support, followed by former Secretary of Transportation under the Biden administration, Pete Buttigieg, at 7%. 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Buttigieg were neck and neck, as they were in October, with Ocasio-Cortez nabbing 6% of respondents’ support overall but falling from third to fourth among the names provided. 

Harris proved to be the most popular choice among all racial groups. She remains by far the favored candidate among Black voters, garnering 55% of their support, 29% of Hispanic and Latinos, 25% of whites and 30% of other races grouped together. Hispanic or Latino respondents showed the strongest support for Newsom among all racial groups surveyed, followed by whites, other races grouped together, and Blacks.

Though Newsom was the top choice for respondents in the West in October, Harris was more popular across the board this time.

Pennsylvania Gov., Josh Shapiro and Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly performed best among those remaining, capturing 5% and 4% of respondents, respectively. Other names polled were the Illinois and Maryland Govs. J.B. Pritzker and Wes Moore, Democratic senators from New Jersey, Kentucky, Minnesota, and Connecticut — Mark Kelly, Cory Booker, Andy Beshear, Amy Klobuchar, Chris Murphy — and California Rep. Ro Khanna. 

The Center Square Voters’ Voice Poll was conducted by Noble Predictive Insights from March 2-5, 2026.

As Oil Hits $120 a Barrel, Damage to Energy Industry is Done, Energy Insiders Say

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) As conflict in Iran escalates, Middle Eastern refineries have been hit and the Strait of Hormuz remains compromised, and oil futures hit $120 a barrel. Physical cargos of crude from Oman and the UAE have already hit $150 a barrel for May delivery.

Prices at the pump and other associated costs are expected to remain high. Gasoline has surpassed $4 a gallon on average, diesel more than $5.25. Despite the Trump administration committing to release 172 million barrels of crude from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, this is only seen as a temporary stop gap measure. After President Donald Trump said the conflict would be over soon, the Pentagon now is expected to ask Congress to fund a conflict it says isn’t a war – asking for another $200 billion.

“Even if the conflict were to end tomorrow and the Strait of Hormuz were to reopen, oil prices would not return to pre-conflict levels of $67 per barrel,” Andrew Lipow, with Houston-based Lipow Oil Associates, said. “The damage to energy infrastructure is done and will take months, if not years, to repair the more extensively damaged facilities. The damage to Ras Laffan in Qatar will reduce LNG supplies while damage to area refineries will reduce gasoline and diesel availability.”

The impacts for the Texas industry, which leads domestic oil and natural gas production, are at least two-fold, Ed Longanecker, president of the Texas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners Association (TIPRO), told The Center Square. “Higher oil prices provide short-term benefit for producers and royalty owners; however, they also increase costs at major refineries and ultimately lead to higher costs for consumers, which is simply a factor of market dynamics that we have no control over.

“The Texas oil and gas industry prefers stability over volatility, even if higher prices deliver short-term financial benefits to some operators. Predictable markets allow for better long-term planning, sustained investment, and reliable supply to consumers.”

TIPRO cautions the administration “against further large-scale draws” from the SPR, he added. “Additional Strategic Petroleum Reserve releases would only provide temporary relief and could potentially undercut the very producers who might be positioned to increase output, even if it’s incremental for a short period of time,” he added.

Lipow notes that while the U.S. “may be nearly self-sufficient in producing enough refined products to meet our demand, it is not in the right place.” When considering national supply sources, east and west coast states import crude oil and refined products and Gulf states export crude oil and refined products, he explains.

The U.S. imports roughly 4 million barrels per day (bpd) of Canadian crude oil, 75% of which is consumed by Rocky Mountain and Midwest refineries, he adds. The Gulf states of Texas and Louisiana export nearly as much of 3.8 million bpd, primarily of light sweet crude. Gulf state refineries also import roughly 1.1 million bpd of heavy crude oil.

Problems will persist on the West Coast because California lost 17% of its refining capacity over the last six months. Due to Democratic policies, both Phillips 66 and Valero permanently closed their Los Angeles and Benicia refineries, The Center Square reported.

West coast states will be forced to import even more gasoline and jet fuel, Lipow said. Alaska is already importing more jet fuel than Hawaii or California with cargo planes coming from Asia refueling in Anchorage, Lipow says.

Prices can be expected to remain high nationally because significant increases in domestic oil production “are months, if not years away,” he said.

Trump’s campaign slogan of “drill, baby drill,” has fallen flat. Rig counts decreased in his first year in office by more than 40. There are 553 operational rigs in the U.S., according to Baker Hughes. “Anything below 500 reflects weakness in the market,” Heywood Cooper with Houston-based Argos Minerals, told The Center Square.

While the Trump administration has touted importing Venezuelan crude as a fix, the short term may result in roughly 300,000 barrels per day (bpd) over the next few months but millions of bpd is years away. “Venezuelan crude is heavy crude and requires a significant percentage of Naphtha to be blended with it just for transportation and handling, for which Chevron has been a source,” Cooper said.

Ongoing risks in the Strait of Hormuz remain a serious concern for the supply side of the industry, the industry insiders said.

Lipow suggested the Trump administration could reduce gas prices by implementing a Jones Act Waiver to “lower transportation costs to deliver fuel.” Trump this week waived the act for 60 days.

Another would be to “pre-emptively have the logistics in place if imports dry up and the shortfall must be supplied off the Gulf Coast. Third, if there is a restriction on crude oil or refined product exports, there will be enough tanker availability to move crude oil from the Gulf Coast to the East and West Coasts.” Yesterday, the industry showed interest in moving a cargo of jet fuel from New York to Hawaii, he said.

Another is for the administration to suspend the federal excise tax of 18.4 cents a gallon on gasoline and 24.4 cents a gallon on diesel fuel. The Trump administration and other states could follow the lead of Florida and Georgia, which both suspended their state gasoline tax several years ago to help offset increased inflationary pressures. Georgia lawmakers this week worked to suspend its gas tax again.

Iraqi Arrested after Entering Texas Elementary School with Gun and Tactical Gear

(José Niño, Headline USA) Police arrested a naturalized citizen originally from Baghdad, Iraq for allegedly entering an elementary school near Houston while armed with a handgun and dressed in tactical gear, the Dallas Express reported.

Kyle Najm Chris, also known as Mohanad Najm Muhi, was taken into custody after allegedly sneaking into Zwink Elementary School north of Houston on March 10, according to a criminal complaint obtained by the outlet. He was described as a “native of Baghdad, Iraq” who received naturalized citizenship on August 24, 2022.

Chris, a Klein resident, faces a charge of unlawful carrying of a weapon in a prohibited place, according to court records. He was held on a $75,000 bond.

The Dallas Express reported that at approximately 1:30 p.m. last Tuesday, a front desk secretary at Zwink Elementary allegedly witnessed Chris bypass “the security procedure for access to the school” by slipping through the front entrance after another person had exited.

The secretary reportedly confronted him about how he gained entry. He responded that the front door was unlocked and asked whether the building had armed security.

“During this encounter, the defendant was dressed in full green military or tactical law enforcement style attire, which included an exterior load-bearing vest as well as a taser and a holstered firearm,” the secretary reported. She also allegedly noticed two patches resembling those of the Houston Police Department, though authorities did not confirm this.

When the secretary asked Chris for identification, he allegedly said he did not have any.

“At no time did the defendant identify himself by name or agency,” the complaint reads.

Later that day, a Klein ISD Police officer learned of the incident. After examining security footage, it reportedly revealed the suspect “enter the school building wearing tactical-style clothing and a holstered firearm.”

“Security footage also showed the Defendant exiting the building, getting into a dark blue Dodge Charger and leaving the school grounds,” the officer wrote.

The officer issued a “be on the lookout” alert to the Texas Department of Public Safety. A Texas DPS special agent used the surveillance footage to identify the suspect as Chris, while the Flock license plate database helped locate his vehicle.

The special agent reportedly confirmed that the suspect was a “native of Baghdad, Iraq” who became a naturalized American citizen on Aug. 24, 2022.

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted his name change from Mohanad Najm Muhi to Kyle Najm Chris. The name choice is notable given that many Americans will recall Chris Kyle, the highly decorated U.S. Navy SEAL sniper widely known as the “American Sniper” who was shot and killed in 2013.

The special agent also discovered that Chris’ vehicle was registered to the security company Houston Private Officers LLC, according to the complaint. The suspect’s LinkedIn profile lists him as the “company owner” and refers to him as Chris Muhi.

State records show Chris held a registration as an “armed” security officer starting in 2017, which expired in August 2025. He also held an “unarmed” security officer registration from 2017 to 2019, an “unarmed” private investigator registration from 2022 to this Friday, March 20, 2026, and an “owner/company representative” registration starting in 2021 that expires in 2027.

His registrations indicate affiliations with Houston Private Officers LLC, Western Eagle Security, Quality Security Services LLC, and G4S.

The Texas DPS special agent allegedly confirmed Chris is not a licensed peace officer or an employee of Klein ISD. The agent also reportedly determined Chris “has no identifiable connection to Zwink Elementary or any other Klein ISD schools.”

School officials sent a letter to families explaining the delayed notification. “From the moment the individual left the front office, we were actively working with multiple law enforcement agencies to identify and apprehend this individual. Sending a public notification during that window could have jeopardized those efforts, tipped off the suspect, and delayed the arrest,” per a report by KHOU. 

José Niño is the deputy editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/JoseAlNino 

FBI Admits to Buying Americans’ Commercial Location Data

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) FBI Director Kashyap Patel admitted Wednesday that the bureau purchases U.S. commercial geolocation data in bulk without a warrant—defending the constitutionally dubious practice by saying that it helps protect the American data.

The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution requires law enforcement agencies to obtain a court order when demanding personal data from communications companies. However, many agencies are bypassing this constitutional requirement simply by purchasing the data from companies, rather than demanding it via court order.

In 2023, former FBI Director Chris Wray said that he didn’t think the bureau bought private geolocation data. But Patel said Wednesday that the FBI indeed does buy such data. He refused to continue the practice.

“The FBI uses all tools to do our mission. We do purchase commercially available information … It has led to some valuable intelligence for us,” he said.

Wyden expressed displeasure with Patel’s answer. He touted his bill, Government Surveillance Reform Act, which would ban the purchase of private U.S. data without a warrant.

The FBI is just one of an untold number of agencies that engage in the warrantless purchase of commercial data.

For example, in December 2023, the outgoing director of the National Security Agency, Gen. Paul Nakasone, admitted to doing so.

“NSA acquires various types of [commercially available information] for foreign intelligence, cybersecurity and other authorized mission purposes, to include enhancing its signal intelligence and cybersecurity missions,” Nakasone told Wyden.

“This may include information associated with electronic devices being used outside—and, in certain cases, inside—the United States. However, NSA does not buy and use location data collected from phones known to be used in the U.S. either with or without a court order.”

Before that, former National Intelligence Director Avril Haines released a report in 2023, confirming that U.S. spy agencies are collecting vast amounts of social media, cell phone and other commercial data.

Examples cited in the report include the Defense Intelligence Agency—the Pentagon’s main intelligence agency—having a system that buys geolocation data around the world.

The FBI also has a contract with the online intelligence firm ZeroFox for “social media alerting,” and the U.S. Navy has a contract with Sayari Analytics, Inc. for access to its database, which purportedly “contains tens of thousands of previously-unidentified specific nodes, facilities and key people related to U.S.-sanctioned actors,” according to the report.

The DHS, meanwhile, has a corporate tool that allows it to analyze companies around the globe and their relationships to various subsidiaries.

Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at x.com/jd_cashless.

U.S. House Tanks Balanced Budget Amendment as National Debt Tops $39T

(Thérèse Boudreaux, The Center Square) The U.S. House tanked a balanced budget resolution to curb the federal government’s practice of racking up trillion-dollar deficits every year.

The failed Wednesday vote comes as federal spending pushed the national debt over $39 trillion, roughly $3 trillion higher than it was 12 months ago.

That means the U.S. government was adding nearly $89,000 per second to the national debt over the past year, according to the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee.

“Congress has failed our country,” House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, said Wednesday. “Our out-of-control spending has jeopardized our economy, our security, our leadership in the world, and, worst of all, compromised our children’s future and the blessing of their inheritance of freedom and opportunity.”

The resolution proposed a Constitutional amendment that would cap federal spending each year at the average annual revenue of the previous three years.

“Total expenditures for a year shall not exceed the average annual receipts collected in the three prior years, adjusted in proportion to the changes in the population of citizens of the United States and inflation,” the resolution reads.

Debt payments are excluded from the definition of “expenditures,” and the amendment would not apply during wartime.

Additionally, lawmakers could override the law if two-thirds of both chambers chose to do so, rendering the amendment effectively toothless with a determined enough Congress.

Arrington chastised the lawmakers who opposed the resolution, saying fiscal irresponsibility is “not a Democrat problem or a Republican problem. It’s an institutional problem that persists and will destroy the greatest nation in human history.”

The resolution’s opponents, however, argue that any balanced budget amendment potentially jeopardizes ever-growing entitlement programs.

Democrats in particular opposed a provision that would have required a two-thirds vote from both chambers in order to impose any tax increases, which would boost federal revenue and could offset deficits.

House Democratic Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., said the resolution left “virtually no way to balance the budget without drastic cuts to Medicare and Social Security.”

The resolution needed two-thirds of the chamber’s support to pass, but it received only 211 votes. Eight Republicans and six Democrats did not vote.

U.S. lawmakers have introduced balanced budget proposals hundreds of times over the past 50 years and over 100 times since 1999 alone.

Only twice in American history has any balanced budget proposal passed either chamber of Congress; the Senate in 1982 and the House in 1995.

“Choosing to abandon our fiscal responsibilities like this does not exist in a vacuum; in fact, it wreaks havoc on our economy and everyday life,” Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, warned Wednesday.

“Higher debt exacerbates inflationary pressures, squeezes out investment in our economy, allows interest costs to dominate our defense spending, leaves us vulnerable to emergencies and geopolitical turmoil, and could even provoke a fiscal crisis,” MacGuineas said. “Rather than ignoring these milestones as both parties have largely done, policymakers should acknowledge them for what they are and begin pivoting toward a more stable course.”

Surging U.S. Diesel Prices Stoke Concerns Over Inflation

(Alton Wallace, The Center Square)  Surging prices for U.S. diesel fuel are stressing the budgets of consumers, governments and industries from trucking, railroads and air travel to agriculture and medical supplies, energy market experts say.

U.S. diesel prices have risen almost 38% in the 20 days since the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran. The average was $5.04 a gallon on Wednesday, the most expensive since December 2022, according to data from AAA.

Diesel fuel powers everything from deliveries of food to grocery stores and medical supplies to hospitals along with the locomotives that drive rail transport and the heavy machinery used at construction sites. In the United States, diesel fuels more than 99% of the railcars now on the tracks.

Research by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City indicates that increases in diesel prices have larger impacts on overall inflation than similar gasoline price increases. Unlike gasoline prices, which primarily affect personal travel, when diesel surges higher it triggers “cost-push” inflation in which businesses must raise prices for nearly all goods to maintain their profit margins.

University of Houston Energy Fellow Ed Hirs said diesel is a “fuel that drives American supply chain.” Surging diesel prices will be passed along to businesses and consumers across a wide range of goods and services, he said.

“The shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz – oil and refined products can’t get through it – and of the large LNG export facility in Qatar, has forced buyers to find a substitute for LNG such as diesel,” Hirs said.

“Nations across the world are buying diesel and liquified petroleum gases to replace the LNG they have been using for power generation.”

LNG is the acronym for liquified natural gas.

Rising diesel prices affect consumers directly through higher costs for commuting and travel while the secondary effects include increased expenditures for moving goods to the people that use them, said Hirs.

About 83% of American agricultural products depend on diesel fuel, for both growing crops and then moving them to markets, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Farmers use diesel to power tractors, combines and irrigation pumps, and when their costs spike it can quickly lead to a 5%–10% jump in prices for staples like milk, meat and bread.

“Diesel – the fuel that powers the American economy – you’re talking about farmers, truckers, this is going to be tremendous in terms of pass-down in the days ahead,” said GasBuddy head of petroleum analysis Patrick De Haan in an interview on Friday.

The rising cost of diesel for local government services like trash pickup, school buses, and grocery deliveries to senior citizens and school cafeterias is an additional financial burden on American consumers, De Haan said.

The United Parcel Service and FedEx both announced significant fuel surcharge increases this week to keep pace with the spike in diesel and jet fuel prices triggered by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

Effective Monday, UPS raised its domestic ground surcharge to 25.5% and its air surcharge to 26%, while FedEx implemented similar weekly adjustments and introduced new “demand surcharges” of up to $0.50 per pound for international shipments.

Price Futures Group commodities analyst Phill Flynn said Monday in an interview on Fox News that if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked “the resulting price shock isn’t just a number on a screen – it’s a direct hit to the American supply chain that will eventually force a reckoning for every business and household budget.”

GasBuddy data on Wednesday shows diesel prices at the most expensive 10% of stations in the United States at an average of $5.68 per gallon while at the bottom 10% the average cost to consumers is $4.23 per gallon.

The states with the lowest average diesel prices on Wednesday were South Dakota at $4.23 per gallon, Montana at $4.29 per gallon, and Oklahoma at $4.30 per gallon. The states with the highest average diesel prices were California at $6.39 and Washington and Hawaii at $5.93 and $5.79 per gallon, respectively.

National Debt Quietly Eclipses $39 Trillion

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) On March 17, the U.S. national debt slipped above $39 trillion.

If you’re thinking, ‘Wow, it seems like we just crossed the $38 trillion threshold,’ you are correct. It was a mere 150 days ago on October 21.

As of March 17, the national debt stood at $39,016,762,910,245.14.

This happened despite a 294 percent increase in tariff revenue and the media relations program known as DOGE.

The pace of debt accumulation is staggering, and it’s accelerating

In 2020, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that the debt wouldn’t hit $37 trillion until 2030.

Oops.

Just how fast is Uncle Sam shoveling more debt into the Debt Black Hole?

Here’s some perspective. The national debt hit $34 trillion in January 2024 and $35 trillion in November 2024.

From there, it took 188 days for the debt to grow from $35 trillion to $36 trillion. It took another 265 days to reach $37 trillion. But don’t be fooled. The borrowing didn’t slow down between $36 and $37 trillion. It was just that the federal government ran up against the debt ceiling on January 1. As a result, it couldn’t borrow any money until the enactment of the “Big Beautiful Bill,” which raised the debt ceiling by $5 trillion as of July 1.

At that time, the national debt stood at $36.2 trillion. It took less than two months for the federal government to borrow more than $800 billion, pushing the debt over $37 trillion. Barely two months later, we were at $38 trillion, and here we are today, just 150 days later.

It’s hard to fathom $39 trillion. What does that even mean?

Here’s some perspective.

Every U.S. citizen would have to write a $113,615 check to pay off the debt.

Of course, a lot of people don’t pay taxes. That means the taxpayer burden is much higher. Every U.S. taxpayer would have to write a check for $357,068 to wipe out the debt.  And that’s on top of the taxes we already pay!

Looking at it another way, $39 trillion is more than the annual GDP of China, Germany, India, Japan, and the UK combined.

If you’re wondering why the markets are so worried about the Federal Reserve holding interest rates higher for longer, look no further than the Debt Black Hole.

Uncle Sam must pay interest on the nearly $39 trillion debt. Interest expense has grown into the second-largest spending category in the federal budget behind only Social Security.

In February, the Treasury forked out $93.48 billion on interest expense alone. That pushed interest expense to $520 billion through the first five months of fiscal 2026. That was up 8.8 percent compared to the same period in fiscal ’25.

Interest on the national debt cost $1.2 trillion in fiscal 2025. That was up 7.3 percent over 2024.

Net interest (interest expense – interest receipts) was $79 billion in February.

Through the first five months of the fiscal year, the federal government spent more on interest on the debt than it did on national defense ($412 billion) or Medicare ($478 billion). The only higher spending category is Social Security ($678 billion).

Much of the debt currently on the books was financed at very low rates before the Federal Reserve started its hiking cycle. Every month, some of that super-low-yielding paper matures and must be replaced by bonds yielding much higher rates. And even after the Federal Reserve cut rates, Treasury yields have pushed upward as demand for U.S. debt sags.

When people say the spending is unsustainable, it feels like an understatement. However, very few people in the political class seem the least bit interested in tackling the problem. The bad news is that at some point, the problem is going to tackle them.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

Gold, the Federal Reserve, and a Catch-22

(Mike Maharrey, Money Metals News Service) If you know inflation is going to increase, would you sell your inflation hedge?

Me neither. That would be dumb, right?

However, that’s what a lot of people did yesterday (Wednesday, March 18), and they’re still doing it this morning. This hints at the Catch-22 still haunting the Federal Reserve and the market’s inability to make sense out of it.

I’ve been writing about this Catch-22 for months. In a nutshell, the Fed simultaneously needs to hold interest rates higher (and arguably raise them) to deal with increasing inflation pressure while also needing to cut interest rates due to the massive Debt Black Hole warping the economy.

It can’t do both. Ultimately, it will have to choose between inflation and propping up the debt-riddled bubble economy. Right now, markets are betting they’ll go after inflation.

I think anybody who believes that is underestimating the force of the debt black hole and the level of malinvestment in the economy as a result of decades of easy money.

Price Inflation Spooks Markets Desperate for Interest Rate Cuts

If you follow the markets, you know that gold fell sharply, breaking below the $5,000 support level. Gold was already under selling pressure. A lot of investors are using the liquidity of their gold holdings to raise cash to navigate the volatility in the markets.

However, a specific headline seemed to spark yesterday’s sell-off – news that producer prices rose far more than anticipated.

Producer prices are considered a leading inflation indicator because companies generally pass on at least some of their higher costs to consumers.

Well, the PPI for February came in red hot. The forecast was for a 0.3 percent month-on-month increase. Instead, producer prices spiked 0.7 percent.

Core PPI, stripping out more volatile food and energy prices, was up a healthy 0.5 percent in February.

On an annual basis, PPI came in at 3.4 percent, with core producer prices rising 3.9 percent.

And of course, this was before the oil price shocks we’re now seeing due to the war with Iran.

Keep in mind that rising prices don’t measure inflation when you define the term properly. Rising producer and consumer prices are one symptom of inflation – an increase in the supply of money and credit. Inflation is caused by money printing. This can result in rising prices.

As I pointed out when the February CPI data came out. While it seemed to signal cooling inflation, a quick look at the trajectory of the money supply reveals that inflation is increasing rapidly, despite the perception that monetary policy is still tight.

So, the fact that producer prices are going up isn’t really a shock, especially when coupled with the impact of tariffs.

But why are people selling gold when inflation is apparently heating up?

It’s a matter of perception. Investors imagine that the Federal Reserve will hold rates higher for longer due to this inflationary pressure (that has been ongoing but is more noticeable when prices start going up). In fact, after the PPI data came out, the expectation for the next rate cut was pushed back to December.

Why does this matter to gold investors?

Because gold is a non-yielding asset. Conventional wisdom holds that investors will spurn gold and turn to other assets as rates increase to capture yield.

I watched this happen over and over again when the Fed was raising rates a few years ago. Every data point indicating inflation was still sticky led to a gold selloff.

Here we go again.

But Will the Fed Really Keep Interest Rates Higher for Longer?

I think not.

Remember that Catch-22.

It can’t keep rates higher – inflation or no inflation. That’s because it must contend with the Debt Black Hole.

The perception that the Fed should hold interest rates higher is absolutely correct. Price inflation remains well above the mythical 2 percent target, and as I’ve mentioned, the money supply is increasing rapidly. In fact, I could make an argument for rate hikes at this point, because the central bank never did enough to kill the inflation dragon. Keep in mind that then-Fed chair Paul Volcker had to jack up interest rates to 20 percent to slay the price inflation of the 1970s.

The fact is, the Federal Reserve never did enough to slay inflation. The central bank tightened monetary policy just enough to subdue the inflation dragon and hoped it wouldn’t get up off the mat. Now it has gone back to creating inflation.

By declaring victory over price inflation and easing monetary policy over the last couple of years, the Fed effectively committed to creating more inflation.

So, why don’t they hike?

Because they know that rate hikes would run a dagger through the heart of this debt-riddled bubble economy.

And that’s the Catch-22. The Fed simultaneously needs to hike interest rates to fight inflation and cut them to rescue the economy.

It obviously can’t do both.

Powell’s comments during his post-meeting press conference on Wednesday reveal the quandary facing the central bank. He conceded that the economic projections and dot-plots released by the central bank weren’t worth a whole lot, saying they had to “write something down,” but there is still a lot of uncertainty.

“If we were ever going to skip an SEP [Summary of Economic Projections], this would be a good one because we just don’t know.”

To date, the central bankers at the Fed have been trying to walk the tightrope. But at some point, economic realities will force their hands. They’ll be forced to cut aggressively when the bottom falls out of the economy. The oil price shock could cause that sooner rather than later.

We also need to address the big elephant standing in the middle of the kitchen. The Fed already wrecked the economy with well over a decade of easy money. It pumped nearly $9 trillion in new money (inflation) into the economy through quantitative easing alone from the onset of the Great Recession through the pandemic. That’s on top of the inflation it created with nearly a decade of zero percent interest rates.

That monetary malfeasance has consequences. It created a massive debt bubble and all kinds of malinvestments in the economy. The impact hasn’t manifested yet.

When the economy visibly cracks, the Fed will be forced to get even more aggressive in loosening monetary policy – elevated inflation or not. If history is any indication, it will cut rates to zero again and launch more rounds of quantitative easing (QE). That means even more inflation.

The worst-case scenario is a protracted period of stagflation.

In fact, CNBC reported on stagflation worries earlier this week. The reporter tried to downplay the potential, but the fact that the mainstream is talking about it at all is telling.

You should take note of the fact that despite all the worry about hot inflation (that they’ll conveniently blame on the war), the Fed still projects a rate cut this year. Think about that. Inflation remains well above the target and appears to be heating up, and the Fed still plans to loosen monetary policy.

That reveals their priorities. If you watch the Fed closely, you will realize that central bankers tend to talk a lot about controlling inflation, but their actions tend toward looser policy to boost the economy.

That won’t likely change.

In other words, expect the inflation to continue.

And you might want to hold onto that inflation hedge.


Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for Money Metals with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.