Student Pro-Life Advocates Rally against Pharmacies that Sell Abortion Pills

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) Student pro-life organizations are taking on pharmacies that announced they will distribute the abortion drug mifepristone.

Students for Life of America and 40 Days for Life protested at various Walgreens and CVS locations, which faced criticism due to the companies’ plans to seek approval to dispense mifepristone.

“We will not sit quietly while our neighborhood drugstores become distribution centers for death and danger,” posted SFLA President Kristan Hawkins on the organization’s website prior to the protests.

The FDA allowed abortion medication to be prescribed and administered through medical offices, hospitals and health clinics. With pharmacies possibly joining the list, many pro-life organizations are concerned.

“Abortion pills have to get into a state somewhere, and they have to get out of a state somewhere,” Sarah Parshall Perry, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, told the Washington Examiner.

“Use of the mail by either the manufacturer or the distributor, the shipper, the recipient, the pharmacy, all of these are very clearly against the U.S. criminal code,” she continued. “So that is the overarching consideration for all of this. But then in addition, this particular group of Republican attorneys general recognize that within their states, there are also state restrictions on abortions.”

Thirteen Republican attorneys general have warned that pharmacy chains could face legal repercussions if they choose to dispense abortion medication through the mail in their respective states of Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Kentucky, South Carolina and Texas.

A Walgreens spokesperson told the Examiner earlier in March that it was not currently distributing mifepristone.

“We intend to be a certified pharmacy and will distribute mifepristone only in those jurisdictions where it is legal and operationally feasible,” said the spokesperson.

CVS and Rite Aid are in the process of seeking certification to provide abortions in the states that allow it. It not known which states exactly this will be available in.

About 53% of abortions currently rely on chemical induction through pharmaceuticals, the far-left Guttmacher Institute reported.

Pelosi Outraged As Biden Says Trump May Be Future President

(Abdul–Rahman Oladimeji Bello, Headline USA) Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., expressed abject horror and outrage at parts of President Joe Biden’s speech on earlier this month, when he pitched his bloated budget proposal.

During the speech, Biden recalled the 2020 election that he snatched from former President Donald Trump.

“I had a big fight with the former president and maybe future president – bless me, Father,” Biden quipped. Following the adverse reaction from the people in the room, Biden noted that he was only joking. 

Los Angeles Times reporter Nolan McCaskill recently interviewed Pelosi and noted that the congresswoman was not pleased with his remarks regarding the former president regaining the seat, according to the Daily Wire. 

“Oh, please. Don’t even say such a thing. That isn’t kidding. That’s horrible,” Pelosi gasped.

Always ready to carry water for the Biden administration, the Associated Press tried to clean up the bumbler-in-chief’s remarks about his predecessor and possible successor, focusing on a “disagreement he had with Trump,” according to the Independent Journal Review.

The former speaker also took exception to Biden referring to Rep. Majorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., as “that gentlelady from Georgia” during his State of the Union Speech.

“He’s going to raise her a million dollars by mentioning her name,” Pelosi grumbled about the president’s comment lending Greene a campaign hand.

Pelosi wasn’t entirely aghast at the president’s budget remarks and she reportedly applauded him numerous times during his speech. The gushing profile of Pelosi from the L.A. Times also managed to work in a plug for a book she said she’s writing.

As for future plans after leaving Congress, Pelosi said she “probably will be saying some things about our democracy and what the Republicans and the court have done to narrow it.”

Pentagon Speeds Up Abrams Tank Delivery to Ukraine

(Headline USA) The Pentagon is speeding up its delivery of Abrams tanks to Ukraine, opting to send a refurbished older model that can be ready faster, with the aim of getting the 70-ton battle powerhouses to the war zone in eight to 10 months, U.S. officials told the Associated Press.

As of late February, the Biden administration was estimated by the BBC to have spent some $112 billion in U.S. tax dollars on Ukraine, about a quarter of which has gone to weaponry and equipment.

However, that only accounts for the active territorial dispute since Russia invaded the former Soviet satellite in February 2022.

The conflict between the two countries had been simmering since a U.S.-backed Ukrainian coup in 2014, under the Obama administration, and America had been providing operational support—both explicit and covert—throughout that span, as well.

President Joe Biden, whose family has been deeply involved in business deals with the Ukrainian government, has since brought the shadow war to the brink of global catastrophe by further provoking and fomenting tension with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The Biden administration’s initial plan was to send Ukraine 31 of the newer M1A2 Abrams, which could have taken a year or two to build and ship. But officials said the decision was made to send the older M1A1 version, which can be taken from Army stocks and will be easier for Ukrainian forces to learn to use and maintain as they fight Russia’s invasion.

The officials spoke on Tuesday on the condition of anonymity because the plan had not yet been publicly announced. Pentagon officials were expected to make the announcement Tuesday.

The Biden administration announced in January that it would send the tanks to Ukraine—after insisting for months that they were too complicated and too hard to maintain and repair.

The decision was part of a broader political maneuver that opened the door for Germany to announce it would send its Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine and allow Poland and other allies to do the same.

It’s unclear how soon the U.S. would begin training Ukrainian forces on how to use, maintain and repair the tanks. That training pipeline could affect the amount of time it takes for the tanks to be used in battle. The Pentagon will also have to ensure that Ukrainian forces have an adequate supply chain for all the parts needed to keep the tanks running.

During a visit to the Lima, Ohio, tank plant in February, Army Secretary Christine Wormuth met with officials there at length to determine the best options for getting the tanks to Ukraine.

“Part of it is figuring out—among the different options—what’s the best one that can allow us to get the Ukrainians tanks in as timely a fashion as we can,” without disrupting foreign military sales, Wormuth said at the time.

Officials at the plant, which is owned by the Army and operated by Reston, Virginia-based General Dynamics, said production totals can vary, based on contract demands. And while they are currently building 15-20 armored vehicles per month, including tanks, they can easily boost that to 33 a month and could add another shift of workers and build even more if needed.

Development of tanks for Ukraine would have to be squeezed in between the current contracts for foreign sales, which include 250 of the newest versions for Poland and about 75 for Australia. During Wormuth’s tour of the facility, workers were preparing to build an updated version of the vehicle for Poland.

Ukrainian leaders have persistently pressed for the Abrams, which first deployed to war in 1991 and has thick armor, a 120 mm main gun, armor-piercing capabilities and advanced targeting systems. It runs on thick tracked wheels and has a 1,500-horsepower turbine engine with a top speed of about 42 miles per hour.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Trump Lawyers Call for Ga.’s Clown-Show Grand Jury Report to Be Tossed

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Lawyers for former President Donald Trump issued a forceful pushback in one of the litany of politically motivated investigations against him by alleging prosecutorial misconduct just weeks after a grand-jury forman raised questions about its integrity in a series of interviews.

While Trump faces a possible indictment in by the Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, more charges against him are brewing in Fulton County, Georgia, where a special grand jury empaneled by District Attorney Fani Willis has been busy scrutinizing Trump’s efforts to challenge the highly dubious outome of the 2020 election.

However, Trump attorney Drew Findling on Monday submitted a 483-page report requesting that Willis be blocked from filing any charges and recuse herself from further investigation into the former president, Politico reported.

“Given the scrutiny and the gravity of the investigation and those individuals involved – namely, the movant President Donald J. Trump, this process should have been handled correctly, fairly, and with deference to the law and the highest ethical standards,” Findling wrote.

The special grand jury, led by foreman Emily Kohrs, released a report earlier this year, but it has no power to issue indictments. Willis will likely call on a traditional grand jury to seek the indictment.

Findling, however, contended that the jury had a “constant lack of clarity as to the law, inconsistent applications of basic constitutional protections for individuals brought before it, and a prosecutor’s office that was found to have an actual conflict yet continued to pursue the investigation.”

He also argued that public comments made by the presiding judge, Robert McBurney, created a problem for future criminal proceedings, and should have disqualified the case from moving forward months ago.

Porn Star’s Disgraced Ex-Lawyer Admits Trump Case is Weak

(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) Michael Avenatti, porn star Stormy Daniels’s former lawyer, said that the hush money case being brought against former President Donald Trump by Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg is weak.

“There are many critical facts and pieces of evidence (texts, emails, etc.) relating to the hush money scandal that have yet to see the light of day,” he wrote. “At this point, you simply can’t build a case on the testimony of Cohen & Daniels.”

Avenatti explained why Cohen was a problem for the Daniels’s case on Twitter.

“Atty Joe Tacopina is no Rudy Giuliani/Sydney Powell,” he wrote. “The guy knows his way around a criminal courtroom. He will destroy Michael ‘Dumb as a Box of Rocks’ Cohen on the stand, esp. seeing as Cohen publicly lied for 15 mos. and now won’t stop talking on TV. #terriblewitness.”

Ryan Fournier, the founder of Students for Trump, pointed out the importance of the story.

“When Michael Avenatti is calling the case against Trump bullshit, you know you lost,” he wrote.

Tim Young, a comedian and editor of The National Mouth, agreed.

“It’s a bad sign for the left when even Michael Avenatti is saying the case against Trump is weak and will fail…,” he tweeted.

Comedian Chris Rock did not weigh in on the credibility of the case, but called the Left stupid for bringing it.

“Do you know this is only going to make him more popular,” he said. “It’s like arresting Tupac. He’s just gonna sell more records. Are you stupid?”

Rock also made a joke at the expense of President Trump.

“[Trump] f—ing a porn star and paid off someone so his wife couldn’t find out. That’s romantic,” Rock joked. “We’ve all been cheated on. Don’t you wish that the person that cheated on you paid off somebody so you wouldn’t find out?”

Bragg, the Manhattan DA, though aware of the details of the case, appears to be undeterred. He sent an email to his staff assuring them of their safety on Sunday.

Los Angeles Schools Shut Down AGAIN as Unions Begin 3-Day Strike

(Headline USA) While students find themselves in dire condition after a union-driven COVID panic kept them out of school for months—if not years—teachers in Los Angeles once again shrugged off the needs of their young charges to demand better wages and working conditions.

Tens of thousands of workers in the Los Angeles Unified School District walked off the job Tuesday over stalled contract talks, and the union-driven picketers were being joined in solidarity by teachers in a three-day strike that has shut down the nation’s second-largest school system.

Demonstrations began at a bus yard and are expected at schools across the city by members of Local 99 of the Service Employees International Union, which represents about 30,000 teachers’ aides, special education assistants, bus drivers, custodians, cafeteria workers and other support staff.

The workers joined picket lines in a steady rain before dawn, demanding better wages and increased staffing.

Some held signs that read “We keep schools safe, Respect Us!”

The district has more than 500,000 students from Los Angeles and all or part of 25 other cities and unincorporated county areas.

“The working conditions have gone down every year,” complained Danielle Murray, a special education assistant who was picketing, according to KABC-TV. “We’re very understaffed. The custodial staff is a ghost crew, so the schools are dirty. They’re doing the best they can.”

She added, “Some people are saying, ‘If you want more money, get a better job.’ Well, some of us have bachelor’s degrees, but we choose to work with a special population that some people don’t want to work with. We want to make a difference to these students.”

Superintendent Alberto M. Carvalho accused the union of refusing to negotiate and said that he was prepared to meet at any time day or night. He said Monday a “golden opportunity” to make progress was lost.

“I believe this strike could have been avoided. But it cannot be avoided without individuals actually speaking to one another,” he said.

Local 99 said Monday evening that it was in discussions with state labor regulators over allegations that the district engaged in misconduct that has impeded the rights of workers to engage in legally protected union-related activities.

“We want to be clear that we are not in negotiations with LAUSD,” the union said in a statement. “We continue to be engaged in the impasse process with the state.”

Those talks would not avoid a walkout, the statement said.

During the strike, about 150 of the district’s more than 1,000 schools are expected to remain open with adult supervision but no instruction, to give students somewhere to go.

Dozens of libraries and parks, plus some “grab and go” spots for students to get lunches also planned to be open to kids to lessen the strain on parents now scrambling to find care.

“Schools are so much more than centers of education—they are a safety net for hundreds of thousands of Los Angeles families,” Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said in a statement Monday. “We will make sure to do all we can to provide resources needed by the families of our city.”

Workers, meanwhile, said striking was the only option they had left.

Instructional aide Marlee Ostrow, who supports the strike, said she’s long overdue for a raise. The 67-year-old was hired nearly two decades ago at $11.75 an hour, and today she makes about $16. That isn’t enough to keep pace with inflation and rising housing prices, she said, and meanwhile her duties have expanded from two classrooms to five.

Ostrow blames the district’s low wages for job vacancies that have piled up in recent years.

“There’s not even anybody applying because you can make more money starting at Burger King,” she said. “A lot of people really want to help kids, and they shouldn’t be penalized for wanting that to be their life’s work.”

The union says district support staffers earn, on average, about $25,000 per year and many live in poverty because of low pay or limited work hours while struggling with inflation and the high cost of housing in LA County. The union is asking for a 30% raise. Teachers want a 20% pay hike over two years.

Carvalho said the district has offered a wage increase totaling more than 20% over a multiyear period, along with a 3% bonus. In addition, the deal would include a “massive expansion of healthcare benefits,” the superintendent told Fox 11 on Monday.

The strike has wide support among union members.

SEIU members have been working without a contract since June 2020, while the contract for teachers expired in June 2022. The unions decided last week to stop accepting extensions to their contracts.

United Teachers Los Angeles, the union representing 35,000 educators, counselors, nurses and other staff, expressed solidarity with their striking co-workers.

“Educators will be joining our union siblings on the picket lines,” a UTLA tweet said. The teachers’ union is also bargaining with the district.

Teachers waged a six-day strike in 2019 over pay and contract issues but schools remained open.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Deflective Dem. Sen. Mark Warner Blasts Biden over Classified Docs Scandal

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., was scrutinized during an event Monday for rolling back banking regulations in 2018 and accepting more than $27,000 in campaign donations from the now-failed Silicon Valley Bank.

Warner downplayed the significance of both the SVB donations and the regulatory rollbacks, turning the attention to the long-running Trump-Biden-Pence classified documents fiasco.

Warner reportedly said the Biden administration’s refusal to release key details behind President Biden’s mishandling of classified documents to lawmakers “doesn’t pass the smell test.”

“The administration’s position is untenable,” Warner said, according to the Washington Times. “If there was a violation made by President Trump, President Biden or Vice President Pence about the mishandling of documents, that ought to be pursued … I’m concerned not only about the documents, but what has been done, if anything, to mitigate [their mishandling].”

Warner’s comments represent a rarity: a Democrat senator criticizing his own party’s leader. The remarks could be explained by the fact that he faces reelection next year in Virgina, which has trended conservative in recent years—as shown by the victory of Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin in 2021.

Monday wasn’t the first time Warner criticized Biden’s handling of the classified documents matter. The senator questioned senior intelligence officials at a March 8 hearing as to why his Senate Intelligence Committee hasn’t had the chance to review the documents in question.

“We still have unfinished business regarding classified documents that we need to see in order for this committee to effectively [perform] its job on intelligence oversight,” he told FBI Director Christopher Wray and National Intelligence Director Avril Haines.

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., also spoke about the classified documents scandal during the March 8 hearing. Cotton’s line of questioning revealed that neither Wray nor Haines have even fully reviewed the records.

“Why have you not reviewed all? It seems to be a matter of vital urgency to make a determination if there actually is a national security risk here,” the senator said.

Haines replied that it’s her policy to never review records, even when their contents “have significant consequences.” Instead, she has “subject-matter experts” review the records and draft reports for her, she said.

Wray made similar remarks, though he said he’s reviewed some of the documents.

“We’re all frustrated we haven’t even had these documents characterized to us,” Cotton told Wray and Haines. “Our patience is starting to run out. The stonewalling needs to stop.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

CNN’s Adam Kinzinger Pushes Libelous Misinfo about Charlie Kirk

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Former Republican Congressman and CNN political commentator Adam Kinzinger continued to cover himself in shame, pushing the lie that conservative activist Charlie Kirk has claimed that he wants to lynch transgenders.

Kinzinger took up the recent statement of the Sacramento Bee, a newspaper that printed and later retracted a libelous statement about Kirk’s fabricated desire to lynch transgenders, the Post Millennial reported.

Before actual facts could be sorted, the Bee managed to spark an Antifa riot on the campus of the University of California-Davis regarding an event at which Kirk was supposed to speak.

Undeterred by the falsity of the claim, which that even the Left admits to, Kinzinger piled on Kirk and sided with the transgender activists.

“Here is weak boy [Charlie Kirk],” Kinzinger wrote in a now-deleted Tweet in which he commented on Kirk’s video wherein he discussed the slander and subsequent UC Berkeley riot. “I hope conservatives realize there is nothing whatsoever conservative about this.”

The tweet should come as no surprise, given that Kinzinger has made a career out of political theater.

Last year, while he was still an Illinois Representative in Congress, Kinzinger posted a photo from 2016, playing it up as a photo from Russia’s recent invasion of Ukraine.

He also may have penned a death threat letter to himself and his family, posting it on social media and passing it off as a letter from a far-Right constituent.

Some noted that, upon closer examination, the handwriting on the letter was extremely similar to Kinzinger’s own handwriting, suggesting that he may have had a hand in the writing of the letter.

Wyoming Leads the Charge in Nationwide Effort to Ban Abortion Pills

(Headline USA) Wyoming has pushed to the front of state efforts to prohibit the most common type of abortion by instituting the nation’s first explicit ban on pills that help induce the death of pre-born babies.

So-called medication abortions became the preferred method for killing fetuses in the U.S. even before the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. They now account for more than half of all abortions according to the far-left, pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute.

More than a dozen states now effectively ban abortion pills by prohibiting all forms of abortion, moves made after a ruling last year in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health overturned the nearly 50-year-old federal abortion mandate established under Roe by deeming it unconstitutional.

Fifteen states restrict access to the pills. Of those, six—Arizona, Indiana, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota and South Carolina—require a doctor to administer them in person. Arizona also bans mailing abortion pills.

But before a law signed Friday by Wyoming Republican Gov. Mark Gordon, no state specifically banned abortion pills.

The law passed alongside a new abortion ban that seeks to sidestep the legal loopholes in earlier state ban that’s been held up in court.

With two new abortion laws, the Wyoming Legislature was “kind of trying to cover all its bases” to prohibit abortions, said Elizabeth Nash with the Guttmacher Institute.

Gordon allowed the new ban to take effect Sunday without his signature.

Whether the abortion-pill ban he signed takes effect July 1 as planned remains to be seen. It could be delayed in the courts if an abortion provider in the state sues over it.

Last year, Gordon signed an abortion ban that took effect a month after the Supreme Court overturned Roe. Within hours, Teton County District Judge Melissa Owens suspended the ban, ruling that a lawsuit’s claim it would harm pregnant women and their doctors could have merit.

The state’s lone clinic providing abortions until the ban was in the tourist mountain town of Jackson. Another clinic in Casper was set to open last year before an arson delayed plans.

The clinic, Wellspring Health Access, was hoping to open next month but those plans are now uncertain.

The two abortion clinics were plaintiffs in the case—along with four female activists, including two obstetricians. They argued that the ban violated a 2012 state constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to make one’s own healthcare decisions.

Attorneys for the state said that wasn’t the intent—the amendment passed in response to the Affordable Care Act seeking to impose a federal-government-run healthcare system nationwide.

This year, Wyoming lawmakers did an end-run around the lawsuit with a new, blanket abortion ban that specifies abortion is not healthcare, and therefore not protected by the state constitution.

An ongoing Texas lawsuit is also hoping to bring the matter of abortion pills before the Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, most Republican-controlled states have adopted abortion bans or tighter restrictions, some of which have long been on the books in anticipation that Roe v. Wade would be overturned eventually.

This month, Utah passed a law to ban abortion clinics, making it the first state to take that action. It came as the state’s ban on abortions at all stages of pregnancies is held up by a legal challenge.

In Florida, lawmakers are trying to figure out what bans to put into place. Florida previously put into place a ban after 15 weeks of pregnancy, which is much looser than what other GOP-controlled states have done; a new measure to ban them after six weeks has been advancing through the Legislature. Gov. Ron DeSantis, a possible 2024 presidential candidate, is expected to sign it if it gets to him.

In South Carolina, also GOP-dominated, lawmakers are debating what kind of ban to try next after a ban on abortions after six weeks was rejected by the state’s activist court.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

As Terrorists Flood Across Border, Crisis Expected to Cost $10B for One State

(Headline USA) The border crisis could cost New York up to $10 billion this year, according to a new report.

Research from the Federation for American Immigration Reform shows New Yorkers will pay $9.9 billion in taxes to support federal, state and local government programs for illegal immigrants. Education-related expenses for the more than 1 million illegal aliens living in the city will cost $4.65 billion; healthcare and welfare programs including food assistance will cost $3.5 billion; and immigration-related law enforcement will cost $1.75 billion, the report says.

Nationally, the border crisis is costing U.S. taxpayers more than $150 billion annually, the report adds. Illegal immigrants have only contributed about $31 billion in tax revenue.

Rep. Mark Green, R-Tenn., said the report is just another example of the Biden administration forcing Americans to “pick up the tab for this historic influx of illegal aliens” by refusing to enforce immigration laws.

“Hardworking Americans across the country should not have to pay for President Biden and Secretary Mayorkas’ refusal to secure our Southwest border,” he said in a statement. “Instead of making families pick up the tab for this historic influx of illegal aliens, the Biden administration should be enforcing the laws on the books and resuming construction of our Southwest border wall to help our Border Patrol do what they do best — secure our border.”

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, agreed: “This report details what we already know: Texans are getting absolutely decimated by lawlessness at the hands of this administration. This chaos has meant dead Americans from fentanyl, ranches destroyed and — as the report indicates — billions of dollars in health care, education, law enforcement and other costs,” he said.

Earlier this week, immigration officials also reported that 16 people on the U.S. terror watchlist had been apprehended last month while trying to cross into the country illegally. The 16 possible terrorists stopped in February were among 128,877 total illegal immigrants caught at the southern border. 

Last year, border officials apprehended 380 individuals on the terror watch list. So far this year, Customs and Border Protection said they have encountered 214 people on the terror watch list.