Sen. Rand Paul Calls for Soros-Funded DA Bragg to Be Jailed

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) With multiple media outlets reporting that former President Donald Trump could be indicted as soon as Wednesday, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on Tuesday said that Soros-funded, Trump witch hunter Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg should be thrown in jail.

Paul eviscerated Bragg for the egregious handling of the porn star alleged hush-money case that the partisan DA is reportedly ready to use in filing felony charges against the former president.

Paul blasted the tweet as it was being widely reported that New York City was bracing Tuesday for what was expected to be a Trump indictment.

The New York Police Department reportedly made a joint decision with the Secret Service to increase security around the Manhattan courthouse, while the NYPD and the city’s Metro Police have also directed all officers to be in uniform and on-call, according to the Daily Mail.

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., blistered Bragg for his misguided use of resources for the sake of political gain, while crime raged in her home state.

“At the same time as you have him politically targeting and persecuting President Trump, he’s lowering felonies and misdemeanors, which has been one of the reasons crime has skyrocketed in New York City,” Stefanik said of Bragg’s tenure.

She reiterated earlier calls from House Republicans for Bragg to provide documents and records related to the reportedly looming indictment of Trump, and questioned the motives for pursuing charges after the Justice Department had already punted the case.

“Even the Washington Post has pointed out that this is a zombie case that the Department of Justice passed upon the Southern District of New York,” Stefnik said. “And now you have the most radical DA imaginable going after President Trump and doing the bidding of Joe Biden.”

Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-Texas, was equally critical of the hyper-partisan DA.

“Soros-owned Alvin Bragg has allowed New York to devolve into a lawless warzone,” he wrote on Truth Social. “He’s put his disgusting politics over people and now the city is SUFFERING. He’s a DISGRACE to this country!”

Biden Targets Washing Machines w/ Another Climate Alarmist Edict

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) Not satisfied with making lives more difficult and expensive by reportedly pushing to ban gas stoves, the Biden regime has turned its attention to also making Americans dirtier, smellier and even poorer.

Caving to a climate-alarmist base, President Joe Biden last month ordered his Energy Department to propose new efficiency standards for washing machines, the Washington Free Beacon reported. The new standards would force washers to use considerably less water, reducing machines’ cleaning capacities, in an effort to “confront the global climate crisis.”

Despite feedback from appliance manufacturers warning that the proposed changes would simultaneously lead to higher costs for consumers and also leave their clothes dirtier, Biden’s Energy Department defended their boss’s latest cave to the Left.

Regime climate commissars conceded that “maintaining acceptable cleaning performance can be more difficult as energy and water levels are reduced,” but insisted that appliance manufacturers like Whirlpool could comply with the malodorous regulations without impacting cleaning efficiency or skyrocketing costs.

Industry analysts weren’t buying the attempted spin.

“When you’re squeezing all you can out of the efficiency in terms of electricity use and water … you by definition either make the appliance worse or slower,” said the Heritage Foundation’s Travis Fisher, who serves as a senior research fellow at the foundation’s Center for Energy, Climate and Environment.

“Why are we so focused on the energy output, as opposed to if it’s helping me wash my clothes? That standard has kind of gone off the rails.”

The manufacturing cost to implement the proposed standards could climb upwards of a staggering $700 million, an expense that would ultimately be passed to consumers. And the regulations “would have a disproportionate, negative impact on low-income households” by eliminating cheaper appliances from the market, according to the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers.

Energy Department officials argued that the proposed washing machine standards could save some consumers money over time through alleged lower energy bills, but even they had to admit that about a quarter of users “would experience a net cost” thanks to the efficiency rule, the Free Beacon reported.

“Didn’t they learn anything from the gas stove ban?” quipped Fox News host Sean Hannity, referring to Biden’s proposed regulations for the popular kitchen appliance.

“I can tell you what is exactly going to happen here, OK?” Fox Business’ The Big Money Show co-host Brian Brenberg said of the proposed green regulations. “You’re going to just wash your clothes twice, which means you’re going to use more water than you do right now and more soap than you do right now.”

Co-host Taylor Riggs said the proposed standards wouldn’t make a dent in any promised climate salvation.

“China and India are the world’s largest polluters, go after them,” Riggs said. “The U.N. climate report says anything we do is worth nothing if we don’t get them on board. Stop coming after small things like washing machines.”

FBI Spent 16,000 More Hours on J6 Protest than on BLM D.C. Riots

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) FBI agents logged upwards of 16,000 more hours while working on the J6 Capitol protest, than they did on the 2020 Black Lives Matter and Antifa riots in Washington, D.C.

According to the documents obtained by the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project through the Freedom of Information Act, FBI agents worked a total of 86,262 hours from Jan 4, 2021, to Jan. 17, 2021, when the J6 rallies occurred and only a total of 70,367 hours from May 25, 2020, to June 7, 2020, when BLM and Antifa riots raged.

“On May 29, 2020, BLM rioters forced President Trump into the White House bunker and burned a historic church,” the Heritage Oversight Project reported.

“During the first week of the 2020 riots, 150 local & federal LEOs in DC were injured. The summer 2020 riots led to $2 billion in property damage & killed at least 19 [people].”

According to whistleblowers inside the government structure, FBI agents were pulled off serious felony investigations to work nearly solely on misdemeanors that happened on Jan. 6.

“We obtained records from FBI’s WebTA system, which tracks all time spent on all investigations,” the Heritage Oversight Project wrote on Twitter. “FBI agents were allegedly pulled off serious felony investigations to work almost solely on Jan. 6 misdemeanors.”

The Heritage Oversight Project decided to sue for more transparency since the FBI did not provide information about how many of the more than 86,000 hours were spent on Jan. 6 cases alone.

“We’re suing the FBI because they deserve it and because these documents belong to the American people. It’s clear the FBI and Justice Department have been weaponized. These numbers show the lengths they will go to to surge resources towards nonviolent offenses that fit their political narratives,” Mike Howell, director of the Heritage Oversight Project, said.

“In the midst of a [George] Soros-funded crime wave, law enforcement should focus their resources where they are needed and put an end to the gangs, rapes, carjackings and murders that have become all too common.”

Christian College Fights Biden Rule to Let Male Students into Female Dorms

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) The College of the Ozarks, a Christian education institution, is standing up to the Biden administration’s order that would mandate the allowance of biological men in female dorms.

The college, based out of Missouri, requested that the Supreme Court consider the order and argued that it violates their religious rights.

According to the College Fix, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a petition by the college, ruling that the Biden administration could force young women to live with biological men because the school is not under threat of immediate legal action.

The Alliance Defending Freedom, which is representing the college, released a statement regarding the case.

“Young women should not be forced to share private spaces with men. That’s what this case is about – the ability of a religious school to protect its students,” Julie Blake, senior counsel at ADF, said.

The suit—filed in 2021, just after Biden took office—mainly takes issue with the redefinition of “sex” to include “sexual orientation” and “gender identity,” a loophole which allows confused young men to house themselves in the women’s dorm.

So, Christian colleges faced a choice: open up their female dorms to men, or face massive government fines.

“When government hurts you and acts illegally, you shouldn’t have to wait for the government to come after you with six-figure fines,” Blake said.

The government did not give any notice before passing the directive, shocking Christian higher education institutions across the nation.

The ADF pointed out that the lack of notification, along with many other aspects of the order, is blatantly illegal.

The lawsuit has been in and out of several different courts, and is awaiting a response from the Supreme Court.

Both college officials and the ADF are hopeful that the Supreme Court will hear the case.

“Our Constitution protects the right of faith-based institutions to operate according to their beliefs. It also protects our freedom by separating power and limiting government,” the college said in a statement regarding the suit. “And in this case the government is clearly overreaching. After all, government officials are bound by the law—and forcing religious colleges to allow male students to live in girls’ dorms clearly violates the law.”

‘White Fragility’ Author Tells ‘POC’ to Stay Away from White People

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) White Fragility snowflake author Robin DiAngelo recently proposed racial segregation, which didn’t result in everyone canceling her, as happened to Dilbert creator Scott Adams, who lost 80% of his income because he previously suggested that white people should get away from black people.

Adams reacted to the results of a Rasmussen Reports poll that showed almost half of the black people who participated in the poll were not ready to agree with the statement “It’s OK to be white”: 26% of black respondents disagreed and 21% said they were not sure, the Daily Wire reported.

“If nearly half of all blacks are not OK with white people… that’s a hate group. And I don’t want anything to do with them,” Adams said. “And based on how things are going, the best advice I could give to white people is to get the hell away from black people. Just get the f*** away. Wherever you have to go, just get away. ’Cause there’s no fixing this. This can’t be fixed.”

Unlike Adams, who was reacting to the results of the poll, DiAngelo suggested in a video group chat that black people should get away from white people, not basing her statement on any data.

“I am a big believer in affinity space and affinity work, and I think people of color need to get away from white people and have some community with each other. And I’ll let that go and maybe see if anyone else wants to pick it up.”

Christopher Rufo picked it up and shared the video on Twitter.

“Robin DiAngelo sounding like an old-line segregationist: ‘People of color need to get away from white people and have some community with each other.'”
Commentator Dave Rubin pointed out the hypocrisy by bringing up Scott Adams.

“Isn’t this what they canceled @ScottAdamsSays for?!”

Adams responded.

“You’re not supposed to notice.”

When one leftist said that the Adams-DiAngelo situation is not hypocritical because Adams called black people a hate group, Adams replied.

“Every adult knows ‘hate group’ is obvious hyperbole in this case. And so do you,” he wrote.

“Taking it literally comes off as a diversion from the point, that the woke part of the world (of all colors) has a mindset that is being poisoned against White people, and White men in particular. Don’t hide from the point. It’s useful information for all.”

Hunter Biden Scandal Plagues President

(Casey Harper, The Center Square) The Hunter Biden investigation reached a new level in recent days after lawmakers announced that millions of dollars were transferred from a Chinese energy company with much of it ending up in the hands of the Biden family and associates.

Now, critics say the Hunter Biden scandal could jeopardize the president’s reelection hopes.

“The promise of Joe Biden the candidate was a return to normal. He presented himself as the kindly older guy who had seen and heard everything and would be a transition away from the tumult of Trump,” Republican strategist and Co-founder of South & Hill Strategies Colin Reed told The Center Square. “He wasn’t going to light the world on fire, but he wasn’t going to wreck the car either. The reality of Joe Biden the president has been anything but, especially as the saga of Biden Inc. continues to unfold in real time. It’s beyond clear at this point that the questions cannot simply be dismissed as fake news or politically motivated.”

In a bombshell report last week, House Oversight Committee Chair Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., said financial records show that Biden family members Hunter Biden, James Biden, Hallie Biden, and another unknown “Biden” received $1.3 million in payments from accounts related to Rob Walker, a Biden family associate.

“Questions about the intersection of money and influence sunk the presidential hopes of Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden would be wise to heed those lessons, particularly now that the latest shoe to drop involves purported payments from Chinese business interests,” Reed added.

The entire scandal developed another layer Friday when Hunter Biden filed a lawsuit against the computer repair shop owner, John Paul Mac Isaac, who handed his laptop over to law enforcement after discovering questionable material on it and being unable to reach Hunter.

That lawsuit, though, confirms that the laptop did come from Hunter Biden and not from Russian disinformation efforts, as much of the media and intelligence experts asserted in 2020. Those assertions were used to clamp down on and even censor the story during the 2020 presidential election cycle, possibly affecting the outcome.

Now, the ongoing scandal has provided steady fodder for Biden’s critics, something that is all but certain to continue if the president runs for reelection.

“The only thing Hunter Biden adds to the equation was access to his father,” U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz said after the news broke.

And lawmakers have shown little sign of slowing the investigation. Comer sent a letter Friday to call on John “Rob” Walker to appear for a transcribed interview.

Walker is an associate of the Biden family who the committee says was connected to bank accounts in the Biden network that received over $1 million. The committee said that “most of the payments to the Biden family came after Rob Walker received a $3 million wire from a Chinese energy company.”

“Rob Walker is a key witness in our investigation of President Biden’s involvement in his family’s business schemes,” the letter said. “After receiving a $3 million dollar payout from a Chinese energy company two months after Vice President Biden left office, Rob Walker then sent over a million dollars in incremental payments to Biden family accounts and a similar amount to another Biden family associate. These records reveal that the three parties likely all received a third of the money from China and it is unclear what services were provided in return. When speaking about dealings with the Biden family, Rob Walker once said that exposing him would ‘bury all of us, man.’ Why? The Oversight Committee has many questions for Rob Walker and we look forward to getting answers for the American people.”

COMMENT: ‘Zombie Drug’ Should Remain Off the Schedule I List

(Peter Clark, FEE) The emerging street drug “tranq” is dubbed the “zombie drug” because it often leaves users with open sores and a disoriented gait. Tranq, better known to veterinarians as Xylazine, an animal sedative, has been making its way into batches of illicit opioids in cities coast to coast.

Xylazine is currently not a scheduled narcotic, but there will be calls from public health officials, law enforcement, and the public to criminalize the use, possession, and sale of the substance. An early example is the proposed bill SB2089 in Illinois which amends the state control substances act to recognize the additive as a Schedule I controlled substance (“no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse”).

The horrific images of the carnage created by the drug are enough to provoke calls to have it criminalized. But such outcry for reactionary measures to reduce the presence of tranq on the black market is misguided. Not only will expanding the scope of our failed five-decade War on Drugs end up only harming society. There are many other reasons why the sale and use of Xylazine should not be prohibited.

Prolonging the Drug War

The budget for the National Drug Control Program agencies in fiscal year 2023 is a staggering $42.5 billion. It is estimated that trillions of dollars has been squandered on the Drug War in total. What have we gotten with this exorbitant multi-decade expenditure? It has done little to stifle the progress of drug cartels. The illicit drug trade remains immensely profitable, yielding “…estimated annual revenues of between $426 billion and $652 billion.” By the government’s admission, the cocaine supply remained steady during the pandemic; the supply of heroin and fentanyl remained high.

In addition, the black market for methamphetamine has expanded to regions of the United States where the drug has traditionally been scarce. The excessive expense of the war has done little to curtail the exponential increase in drug overdoses over the past 20 years; almost 75%  of all overdoses in 2020 were opioid-related. Any cost-benefit analysis would indicate that the Drug War has been a colossal failure, and that dedicating more time and resources to combat newly prevalent street drugs, even if one of the side effects is rotting flesh, is a losing battle.

Placing another intoxicant on the Schedule I list would only expand the scope and authority of law enforcement agencies. The civil liberty violations perpetrated in the name of this paternalistic public health crusade would continue. Examples include civil asset forfeiture (four states abolished this practice as of 2021) and the controversy over no-knock warrants (which violates the knock-and-announce rule in Common Law).

It’s chilling to think about the innocent lives lost due to such aggressive tactics (exacerbated by the militarization of the police during the 1980s) to enforce drug laws. Many innocent people have died due to such procedures; high-profile examples include Rev. Accelyne Williams and Breonna Taylor. Tranq is not an excuse to continue the failed, costly and unjust policies of the Drug War, which criminalizes voluntary exchange between consenting adults.

Focus on Treatment and Harm Reduction

The rate of recidivism is high among addicts for violating drug laws. The observation that treatment has been more effective and less costly than incarceration has been enduring. As long as the possession and use of addictive drugs remain illegal, addicts will fear seeking treatment and medical attention. The legal system operates as “a barrier to treatment” (due to fear of legal penalties). The use of dangerous substances should not be encouraged; removing the legal penalties would relinquish the stigma. After Portugal decriminalized drugs in 2001, the number of addicts in treatment increased by 147% between 1999 and 2003. Although tranq is currently an additive to opioids, it may become the preferred drug of abuse on the streets (e.g. the shift from heroin to fentanyl). If tranq is the future of addiction in America, we should not erect legal barriers discouraging addicts from seeking treatment.

Even if stringent penalties are enacted to prevent the use, sale, possession, and manufacturing of tranq, people will probably continue to ingest it. Since tranq is more potent than fentanyl and creates oozing wounds, harm reduction initiatives implemented by private organizations might be a better way to manage this crisis.

The success of needle exchange programs and safe injection sites in reducing the prevalence of bloodborne pathogens from intravenous drug use would apply to the Tranq epidemic. But also providing on-site wound care would help reduce the onset of infections and the need for amputation.

Prohibition Will Only Make Tranq More Dangerous

Consumer demand drives all markets, including those for illegal products. Enterprising chemists synthesize novel substances to exploit loopholes in drug laws. A decade ago, the media reported on the dangers of bath salts (synthetic cathinone) and synthetic cannabinoids (K2). If Marijuana and Cocaine were never outlawed, neither compound would exist. Both substitutes intended to circumvent US controlled substance laws. Arguably, the pharmacological effects of both drugs are more harmful than the substances they imitate.

If Tranq is placed on the Schedule I list, there is no doubt that clandestine labs will attempt to replicate the sedative. A molecularly altered variant of the drug may surface as means to evade drug laws, possibly creating a more deadly substance.

Feds to Blame for Leaving EV Drivers Stranded at Interstate Rest Stops

(Jon Miltimore, FEE) When Georgia resident Anita Jefferson pulls her Tesla out of her garage each morning, she knows it’s fully charged and ready to go. But she told a local reporter her confidence disappears when she hits the interstate. Charging stations seem few and far between, even at places where you’d expect them to be, like rest stops.

“The one place you would want to travel and stop would be a state rest stop,” Jefferson told an Atlanta news station. “I want to get an answer as to why they’re not there.”

Jefferson got her answer from WXIA-TV Atlanta’s Verify team: There are no charging stations at rest stops because they are prohibited under a federal law—one that stretches all the way back to the Eisenhower administration.

‘You Would Be Paying for That Energy’

In 1956, Ike signed into law a bill—the Federal-Aid Highway Act—that paved the way (pun intended) for the interstate highway system, which included rest areas at convenient locations.

While there were numerous problems with the legislation, a relatively minor one was that it created strict limits on what could be sold at these rest stops. Today, federal law limits commercial sales to only a few items (including lottery tickets), the Verify team found. When President Joe Biden rolled out a $5 billion funding plan for states to create EV charging stations, he neglected to carve out a commercial exemption for EVs.

“You would be paying for that energy,” Natalie Dale of the Georgia Department of Transportation told WXIA-TV Atlanta. “That would count as commercialized use of the right-of-way and therefore not allowed under current federal regulations.”

Bureaucrats and Nonbureaucrats

If you think this sounds like an inauspicious roll out to the massive federal EV program, you’re not wrong.

Allowing drivers to charge their EVs at convenient, familiar locations that already exist along interstate highways is a no-brainer—yet this simple idea eluded lawmakers in Washington, DC.

Unfortunately, it illustrates a much larger problem with the top-down blueprint central planners are using to create their EV charging station network.

“We have approved plans for all 50 States, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia to help ensure that Americans in every part of the country…can be positioned to unlock the savings and benefits of electric vehicles,” Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said in a 2022 statement.

While it’s good the DOT isn’t trying to single-handedly map out the locations of thousands of EV charging stations across the country, there’s little reason to believe that state bureaucrats will be much more efficient. A review of state plans reveals a labyrinth of rules, regulations and stakeholders dictating everything from the maximum distance of EV stations from highways and interstates to the types of charging equipment stations can use to the types of power capabilities charging stations must have.

The primary reason drivers enjoy the great convenience of gasoline stations across the country—there are some 145,000 of them today—is that they rely on market forces, not central planning. Each year hundreds of new filling stations are created, not because a bureaucrat identified the right location but because an entrepreneur saw an opportunity for profit.

Bureaucracy will never be able to match the efficiency of markets, which use millions of signals to reach decisions, and are constantly being corrected by market changes, all in the pursuit of serving customers and making a profit.

This, the economist Ludwig von Mises pointed out, is precisely the opposite of what bureaucrats do.

“A bureaucrat differs from a nonbureaucrat precisely because he is working in a field in which it is impossible to appraise the result of a man’s effort in terms of money,” Mises wrote in his seminal work Bureaucracy.

Incentives and Knowledge

Just how burdensome these regulations will prove remains to be seen.

While some states will develop EV charging plans more amenable to market forces than others, all of them are likely to suffer to some extent because the push toward EVs itself has been top-down, driven by politicians trying to push consumers off of gas-powered vehicles.

What’s clear is that the bureaucratic structure of DOT’s charging station blueprint does not bode well for consumers. Charging technology and transportation are constantly evolving, and politicians and bureaucrats simply can’t respond to these changes as efficiently as markets.

So while there is much talk today that EV charging stations will soon outnumber gas stations, there’s reason to be skeptical of this claim—even with the government’s $5 billion spending spree.

There’s little reason to believe that state planners will create a framework with the proper incentive structure to meet the market’s needs. Bureaucrats and politicians lack both the knowledge and proper incentives to create a functional EV market.

If you doubt this, just ask Anita Jefferson, who can’t even charge her Tesla at rest stops—because of a federal law passed in 1956.

OKC Bombing Accomplice’s Son Imprisoned

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Josh Nichols, who the FBI once baselessly accused of being involved in the Oklahoma City bombing as a 12-year-old, is headed back to prison after a life of hardship.

The troubled son of imprisoned OKC bombing co-conspirator Terry Nichols pleaded guilty earlier this month in Las Vegas to kidnapping and armed robbery in a case that will get him at least five years in a Nevada prison.

Nichols’ downward spiral has been well documented ever since his father was arrested for being involved in an attack that killed at least 168 people, including 19 children.

The FBI played a large part in making a 12-year-old’s already shattered life even harder.

In the days following the April 19, 1995, attack, the young Nichols was cooperative with the FBI when questioned about his father.

But then, the FBI baselessly accused the boy of being “John Doe 2”—the mysterious suspect seen by more than 20 people on the morning of the attack. Terry Nichols, who helped assemble McVeigh’s bomb, was excluded as John Doe 2 because he was in Kansas on April 19, but the feds suspected for a while that his son may have been with McVeigh.

The Dallas Morning News reported on May 10, 1995, that officials “have no evidence that the boy, Joshua Nichols, had knowledge of the terrorist attack, only that he might have accompanied Timothy McVeigh when he rented the truck believed used in the blast.”

Legendary investigator Roger Charles noted that the FBI’s suspicions of Nichols were completely unfounded.

“Josh was not tied in any way to the acquisition of materials, and he had a rock-solid alibi for April 19,” Charles wrote in Oklahoma City: What the Investigation Missed and Why it Matters.

Charles detailed the harassment Nichols received by the FBI, which was likely using the boy to pressure Terry Nichols to cooperate.

“The FBI asked [Josh’s mother] to repack the bag Josh had taken to Kansas for his Easter trip, so the clothes could be tested for bomb-making residue. She did so, and they were clean. A few days later, the FBI asked her for every baseball cap in Josh’s collection so they could be compared to witness sightings of the cap worn by John Doe 2. Again, she complied.”

The FBI’s fool’s errand diverted crucial time and resources away from catching the true John Doe 2, who to this day remains at large, Charles noted.

“For about eight days, the FBI allowed the circus surrounding Josh to bring the hunt for John Doe 2 to a complete standstill. According to the Secret Service, up to 150 new leads were held back from investigative field office around the country. When it finally became clear, on May 11, that no joy was to be had from Josh, they were sent out again.”

Along with helping to tank its own investigation, critics say the FBI’s baseless harassment of Nichols contributed to the boy’s teenage turn to drugs and alcohol—a tragedy documented by Kathy Wilburn-Sanders, who lost her two grandsons in the bombing.

Wilburn-Sanders was on her own quest to solve unanswered questions about the bombing in the years after 1995. In an amazing act of forgiveness, she became pen pals with Terry Nichols and met his son in 1999.

“I couldn’t imagine a 12-year-old boy under interrogation by the FBI … How much stress could one child endure?” Wilburn-Sanders wrote in her memoirs, Now You See Me: How I Forgave the Unforgivable.

Wilburn-Sanders noted that Nichols was mercilessly bullied by his classmates over the matter.

“Josh had often been bullied by public school classmates and adults, people who attacked in groups that left him crying and bleeding in the streets,” she wrote.

Wilburn-Sanders attempted to provide support to the boy, telling him she had forgiven his father and suggesting he should too.

“He responded as most teenagers respond to words of guidance—with silence,” she wrote.

Unfortunately, Wilburn-Sanders’ efforts were unsuccessful. Nichols was charged in 2006 with two counts of assault with a deadly weapon, resisting an officer, battery of an officer, and possession of a stolen vehicle.

Nichols, then 23, was sentenced to 19 to 48 months imprisonment—a sentence reduced thanks to a passionate letter from Terry Nichols pleading for leniency.

Nichols eventually left prison in 2012. His latest charges stem from a February 2020 attack on a man in Las Vegas.

Nichols, now 40, could end up serving more than 17 years in prison, according to his written plea agreement. Terry Nichols, 65, is serving multiple lifetime federal prison sentences without the possibility of parole.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

DeSantis Plans Major Policy Speech at Heritage Conference in April

(Headline USA) The Heritage Foundation announced this week that Florida Gov. Ron  DeSantis will headline its 50th leadership summit next month and deliver a “major policy speech,” adding more fuel to the widespread speculation about his 2024 ambitions, Fox News reported.

“Conservatives are craving a bold and visionary leader who gets things done—and that’s exactly what Gov. Ron DeSantis has accomplished in Florida,” Heritage President Kevin Roberts said in a statement.

“Heritage recognized Florida as the top state in America for parental rights and school choice, largely because of Gov. DeSantis’ leadership,” Roberts added. “He’s unafraid to take on woke and powerful corporate interests while putting the values of everyday Floridians first and foremost.”

The summit will feature other prominent conservatives, including Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin and Fox News host Tucker Carlson.

DeSantis is widely expected to launch a bid for the presidency at some point this summer—much to the chagrin of former President Donald Trump, the first GOP candidate to announce his run and current frontrunner.

Trump has attacked DeSantis frequently in recent months, calling the governor “Meatball Ron” and accusing him of being an establishment prop.

DeSantis, however, has largely avoided engaging with Trump. This week, for example, when asked whether he would help fight Trump’s extradition to New York if prosecutors try to indict him, DeSantis said he would not get involved with the debacle.

“I don’t know what goes into paying hush money to a porn star to secure silence over some type of alleged affair. I can’t speak to that,” DeSantis said in an apparent jab.

“But what I can speak to is if you have a prosecutor who’s ignoring crimes happening every day in his jurisdiction, and he chooses to go back many years ago to try to use something about porn star hush money payments,” he added, referring to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. “That’s an example of perusing a political agenda and weaponizing the office.”