Trump Raised Over $18 Million in 3 Months

(Headline USA) President Donald Trump has raised more than $34 million for his 2024 White House run since the start of the year.

He was buoyed by a big bump in donations since the announcement of criminal charges against him in New York, according to his campaign.

His total after the March 30 indictment approached what he took in over the previous three months.

Trump’s latest fundraising report due to be filed Saturday with the Federal Election Commission will show he raised more than $18.8 million between his main campaign account and a joint fundraising account over the first three months of the year, the campaign said.

Of that total for the Jan. 1-March 31 period, $4 million came in after Trump was indicted.

The fundraising numbers were first reported by Politico.

Trump began raising money off the news of his indictment, and his campaign said he took in $15.4 million since the announcement of charges and Saturday’s filing deadline for the fundraising report.

Trump has dominated the GOP field in the early stages of the 2024 presidential race. Until his indictment, his campaign fundraising had lagged behind the massive amounts he used to raise in days or in hours when he was president.

More candidates, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, are expected to enter the race by the time next fundraising reports are due in mid-July.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Silicon Valley Politician Indicted for Leaking Insider Information to Corporation

(Headline USA) A Silicon Valley city councilman has been charged with perjury after he allegedly lied about leaking a grand jury report to the San Francisco 49ers last year that detailed a purportedly unethical relationship between the team and the city council, prosecutors said Friday.

Santa Clara City Councilmember Anthony Becker is accused of providing the secret report titled “Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Santa Clara City Council” to the team’s former top spokesperson and a local media outlet in 2022, days ahead of its official release.

Becker then allegedly lied to the grand jury about the leak, prosecutors said, prompting the criminal charges.

The 49ers play in Levi’s Stadium in the city of Santa Clara, about 35 miles (56.33 kilometers) south of San Francisco. Santa Clara County is broadly considered home to Silicon Valley.

The city of Santa Clara owns the stadium and leases it to the team; fighting between the two groups has led to ethics complaints, legal disputes and years of bad blood.

Al Guido, the team’s president, and Larry MacNeil, the former CFO who worked extensively on the team’s stadium project, were named in the indictment as witnesses who spoke to the criminal grand jury for Becker’s indictment.

“The 49ers have cooperated fully with the District Attorney’s Office in their investigation, and will continue to do so,” team spokesperson Brian Brokaw said in a statement Friday. “However, because this is an ongoing legal matter, the organization is not able to make any further comment at this time.”

Prosecutors say the team has bankrolled Becker’s political career by spending $3.2 million through independent expenditure committees for his 2020 city council race, which he won, as well as his unsuccessful 2022 mayoral bid.

The “Unsportsmanlike Conduct” report alleged that Becker and four other councilmembers regularly voted “in a manner that is favorable to the 49ers” and would routinely meet with the team’s lobbyists but not disclose what was discussed.

Becker faces a felony charge of perjury under oath, as well as a misdemeanor charge of willful failure to perform duty. He is scheduled to be arraigned Monday.

Becker did not immediately respond to requests for comment Friday, and it was not clear whether he had an attorney who could speak on his behalf.

“Councilmember Becker violated the public’s trust,” Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said in a statement. “That an elected official would commit perjury and lie under oath before the grand jury strikes at the very heart of our justice system and requires accountability.”

Representatives for the Santa Clara City Council did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Colorado Becomes a Sanctuary State for Sexual Deviancy

(Headline USA) A trio of health care bills enshrining access to sex-changes, protecting abortion, and restricting pregnancy centers became law in Colorado on Friday as the Democrat-led state tries to make itself a sanctuary state for sexual degenerates in its neighboring states.

The main goal of the legislation signed by Democratic Gov. Jared Polis is to ensure people in surrounding states and beyond can go to Colorado to kill their unborn child, block their natural hormones or mutilate their genitals without fear of prosecution. Bordering states of Wyoming and Oklahoma have passed abortion bans, and Utah has severely restricted transgender care for minors.

Many states with abortion or genital mutilation bans are also criminalizing traveling to states for the purpose of killing their baby or mutilating their body.

The contradicting laws are setting the stage for interstate disputes comparable to the patchwork of same-sex marriage laws that existed until the Supreme Court’s fiat of Obergefell v Hodges.

With the new laws, Colorado joins Illinois as a sanctuary state for sexual deviancy, offering infanticide to residents of conservative states on three sides.

Colorado’s southern neighbor, New Mexico, is also controlled by Democrats and signed a similar abortion protection bill earlier this year. It legally shields those who seek abortions or gender-affirming care, and those who provide the treatments, from interstate investigations.

Visits to Colorado’s abortion clinics have increased by about a third since the overturning of Roe v. Wade, and wait times for an appointment have increased from one or two days up to three weeks, according to state lawmakers. They also expect an increase in wait times for gender mutilation.

Colorado House Minority Leader Mike Lynch said he feared the legislation would make Colorado an abortion destination that will attract “the vulnerable, the indigent and frightened minors from all over the country” and said the package of laws does not protect choice.

“They deny a new mother the choice to consider alternative options other than to end her pregnancy,” Lynch, a Republican from Wellington, said in a statement.

Karen Middleton, president of Cobalt Advocates, a Denver-based organization that pushes for legalized infanticide, said most of the women traveling to Colorado since the Supreme Court ruling have come from Texas and Wyoming. The organization spent $220,000 to help women travel for abortions in Colorado last year, most of them from other states, up from $6,000 in 2021, she said. That is on top of money spent for the actual procedures.

Polis added the first layer of abortion protection a year ago, signing an executive order that bars state agencies from cooperating with out-of-state investigations regarding reproductive healthcare. One of the bills he signed Friday codifies that order into law. Like the New Mexico law, it blocks court summons, subpoenas and search warrants from states that decide to prosecute someone for having an abortion.

Colorado’s abortion law extends the protections to transgender patients dodging restrictions in their own states. The sexual mutilation of children has been available for decades, but some states have recently barred minors from accessing it, even with parental consent.

Conservative states are pushing back. Idaho passed a bill that outlaws providing a minor with abortion pills and helping them leave the state to terminate a pregnancy without their parents’ consent.

Also on Friday, Polis signed a measure that outlaws “deceptive practices” by anti-abortion centers, which are known to suggest alternatives to infanticide. The bill also prohibits sites from offering what’s called an abortion pill reversal.

Another bill signed Friday requires large employers to offer coverage for the total cost of an abortion, with an exception for those who object on religious grounds. It exempts public employees because Colorado’s constitution forbids the use of public funds for abortions.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

PragerU Founder Defends Porn

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Dennis Prager, a conservative commentator, radio host and the founder of PragerU, defended pornography in a round table discussion with Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson, saying that it is “not awful” if used as a “substitute for adultery.”

Prager stated his position at a Daily Wire seminar on the Book of Exodus, the Daily Caller reported. When a question about lust and sexual sin came up, Prager, a practicing Jew, said to his fellow panelists that a man looking lustfully at a woman “is not a sin in Judaism.”

“I am less interested in the interior person, morally speaking, than you are, than probably any of you are, and it’s largely — I do believe — because I come from a behaviorist, law-based religion. We care how you act,” he said.

“That’s why we don’t have a claim that if you look at another woman with lust, it’s as if you’ve committed adultery with her,” he added, implying one of Jesus’s sayings in Matthew 5:28. “There’s only one way to commit adultery in Judaism and it’s with a different organ.”

Peterson then asked Prager about his view on pornography. The latter defended the use of pornography under certain conditions because, according to him, “men want variety.”

He then talked about his experience as a radio host and explained that when listeners call in to ask him about the subject, he asks them if the pornography use detracts from or enhances their sexual relationship.

“If adultery is a substitute for one’s wife, it’s awful. If it’s a substitute for adultery it’s not awful,” Prager said. “I know this is not a religious answer.”

According to the Daily Caller, Prager has been divorced twice and has been married to his third wife since 2008.

On the other hand, Peterson has repeatedly spoken out against watching pornography, calling it “not a net social good.”

In November 2021, Peterson spoke to Dave Rubin and compared the consumption of pornography to Pleasure Island in “Pinnochio.”

“It’s all pleasure with no responsibility. That’s deadening. It’s parasitical in a sense,” he said, talking about the time and money spent on online porn sites.

Conservative Women Celebrate Their Womanhood in Spite of Dylan Mulvaney

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Conservative women decided to celebrate their womanhood after a “transgender” activist Dylan Mulvaney decided to continue pretending that he is a female by marking his so-called “365th Day of Girlhood.”

According to Breitbart, Mulvaney, a current disaster for Bud Light and its parent company, celebrated “having dressed up as a woman for 365 days” in March.

“Actress, content creator and TikTok sensation Dylan Mulvaney made her grand return to the stage in a one-night-only variety show celebrating her 365th Day of Girlhood on Monday, March 13th, 2023!” the event’s website stated.

“Streamed live from New York City’s iconic Rainbow Room at Rockefeller Center, Dylan Mulvaney’s Day 365 Live! marked one full year since Dylan began publicly sharing her journey in her viral “Days of Girlhood” series.”

Women decided to protest a grifter mocking them for fame.

On Tuesday, Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Co., shared an image of herself holding an American flag and wrote about her experience as being an actual woman.

“Today, I celebrate 13,262 days of being a woman. I’ve been pregnant five times (miscarried in 2012) and gave birth to four incredible boys that came out of my womb,” she wrote.

“Any day now, one of those four boys will make me a grandmother. Womanhood is so much more than just dressing up in makeup and a skirt for internet videos.”

Rep. Mayra Flores, R-Texas, shared similar information about herself.

“Today, I celebrate 13,615 days of being a woman. I’ve been pregnant four times and gave birth to four incredible children who came out of my womb,” she wrote.

“There is no greater pain and greater joy than becoming a mother.”

Other women joined conservative politicians as well.

On Wednesday, the woman responsible for the Twitter account MAGA Barbie shared an image of Mulvaney and said he is “making a career out of mocking women.”

“He’s always been a fame chaser. Tried everything to be famous, but that didn’t get him the fame he craved, so he decided to pretend to be a girl.”

Biden Admin. Gives Millions to ‘Green’ Groups Who Supported Climate Bill

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency gave $177 million of taxpayers’ money to environmental groups, including those who publicly supported the Biden administration’s signature climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act.

According to a press release by EPA, the funding will be spread across 17 groups. Each group will receive a minimum of $10 million to serve as Environmental Justice Thriving Communities Technical Assistance Centers [EJ TCTACs], help “underserved and overburdened communities” and access government funding to support environmental justice initiatives.

The groups that openly supported the Inflation Reduction Act are the National Wildlife Federation [NWF], WE ACT for Environmental Justice and the Deep South Center for Environmental Justice [DSCFEJ].

NWF fully supported the law, while the other two organizations offered more measured support, over concessions made to fossil fuels at the behest of Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W. Va. The Research Triangle Institute — a nearly billion-dollar nonprofit with a longstanding working relationship with the agency — will also serve as an environmental justice center.

“These EJ TCTACs are in direct response to feedback from communities and environmental justice leaders who have long called for technical assistance and capacity building support!” the EPA’s Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights wrote in a tweet thread on Thursday.

“The EJ TCTAC program is partnered with [the Department of Energy] and is part of the Federal Interagency Thriving Communities Network to deliver on the Biden Administration’s Justice40 Initiative to ensure that 40% of the benefits of certain federal investments flow to disadvantaged communities,” the organization added.

According to the Daily Caller, the funding represents a significant boost to groups like the NWF and DSCFEJ. The NWF generated roughly $118 million in revenue in 2021. The DSCFEJ generated just $3.54 million in 2020.

“We know that so many communities across the nation have the solutions to the environmental challenges they face,” EPA Administrator Michael Regan said.

“Unfortunately, many have lacked access or faced barriers when it comes to the crucial federal resources needed to deliver these solutions. Today we’re taking another step to break down these barriers.”

According to the EPA’s press release, the EPA has announced a combined $827 million in funding for environmental justice initiatives in 2023.

MURDOCK: Biden’s New EV Mandate Crafted by Drunken Leprechauns

0

(Deroy Murdock, Headline USA) Regarding electric vehicles, President Joe Biden cannot simply use his bully pulpit to preach EVs’ virtues.

Gift-wrapping them in lavish taxpayer-funded subsidies is not enough for Biden, either.

So, this dictator rules by fiat. Rather than ask Congress to enact a pro-EV law, Emperor Biden issued a decree on Wednesday, via the Environmental Protection Agency:

By 2030, 54% of new passenger vehicles must be electric. Just two years later, this mandate would grow by more than one-fifth, until 67% of new cars and light trucks are electric in 2032.

This edict bludgeons personal freedom, is terminally grandiose, and defies economic reality. It surely was crafted by leprechauns whom Biden just befriended in Ireland.

Most offensive, Biden’s directive tells American adults which vehicles to purchase. I respect a woman’s right to choose which car to buy. Biden disrespects that right and will make it tougher for women (and men) to exercise it.

Barking orders at grown Americans gives Biden something close to carnal satisfaction. For the 47% of Americans who recently told pollsters that they are “Not too likely/Not at all likely” to buy EVs, Biden’s command feels like taking a cold shower—alone.

Biden’s mandate is absurdly overambitious.

Last year, just 5.8% of new cars were EVs. So, Biden demands a 931% increase in EV sales in the next seven years—a 133% annual hike through 2030.

And he ordains 1,155.2% unit-sales growth in the next nine years—a 128.3% yearly boost between today and 2032.

Good luck!

The Alliance for Automotive Innovation said: “This requires a massive, 100-year change to the U.S. industrial base and the way Americans drive.”

Imposing such a wholesale economic overhaul this swiftly would rival Mao Zedong’s Great Leap Forward. That government program killed a mere 20 million Chinese citizens.

This timetable is unachievable, especially when Biden padlocks mining projects in Alaska, Nevada and Minnesota that would help yield additional sources of copper, cobalt, lithium and other minerals indispensable to EV production.

Even if America manufactured all of these EVs, what would happen after they got plugged into an already strained grid? Imagine a national overburdened-power-strip inferno.

“Independent estimates indicate that we need to expand electricity transmission systems by 60% by 2030, and may need to triple it by 2050 to meet the country’s increase in renewable generation and expanding electrification needs,” the U.S. Department of Energy stated last May 10.

“Between 2008 and 2021, according to C Three Group, the U.S. high-voltage transmission system grew by about 1,700 miles per year,” energy scholar Robert Bryce wrote in a Feb. 9 Substack post.

At 1,700 miles of new high-voltage power-line construction per year, increasing today’s 240,000 miles of HV lines by 60%, or 144,000 miles, would take 84 years or until 2107. To build this new capacity by Biden’s 2030 deadline, productivity would have to rocket 12-fold.

What would this cost? Bryce calculates about $4 million per mile. So, these 144,000 miles would devour $576 billion or $82.3 billion annually between now and 2030.

So, will Biden’s proclamation at least curb so-called “global warming?”

According to a White House statement: “Through 2055, EPA projects that the proposed standards would avoid nearly 10 billion tons of CO2 emissions—equivalent to more than twice the annual U.S. CO2 emissions in 2022.”

Thus, over the next 32 years, Biden’s scheme would cut US CO2 by 312.5 million tons annually, totaling 10 billion tons at mid-century.

Too bad China produced 10.081 billion tons of CO2 in 2020 alone, the International Energy Agency reports. Hence, China’s yearly CO2 output would obliterate whatever “gains” Biden imagines over a 32-year period.

In other words: Unless Beijing revolutionizes its behavior, Biden’s 10-billion-ton CO2 reduction will vanish within a 320-billion-ton cloud of Chinese carbon.

Biden’s EV policy combines fascistic decrees, magic thinking, exorbitant costs, elusive benefits and powerful acid. If the White House pumps enough LSD into the U.S. water supply, every American could enjoy Emperor Biden’s phantasmagorical vision.

Fox News contributor Deroy Murdock writes from Manhattan.

DHS Group Classified Las Vegas Shooting as Anti-Gov’t Terrorism

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) The FBI and local police have yet to find a motive for the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting, but that hasn’t stopped a DHS-sponsored academic organization from deeming the deadly event as anti-government terrorism.

Headline USA discovered this while researching Las Vegas gunman Stephen Paddock for an exclusive story about his mental illness. As reported earlier this month, newly released FBI records show that Paddock was rumored to be a psych patient—adding to previous reports that he had told people around him he was a “government experiment,” and would often lie in bed “moaning and screaming” in mental anguish.

While these facts indicate that Paddock was driven by severe mental illness—and not political ideology—the University of Maryland’s DHS-sponsored “National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism,” or START, has classified the deadliest mass shooting in American history as anti-government terrorism.

START, which is a DHS “Emeritus Center of Excellence,” maintains the Global Terrorism Database, which tracks more than 200,000 terrorist attacks since 1970. START has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the DHS, including a $750,000 grant last year to study extremism in the military.

In an article explaining its decision about the Las Vegas shooting—which killed 60 and injured 850—START cited two unnamed FBI witness statements about Paddock’s purported anti-government extremism. One of the witnesses was recently incarcerated on a drug possession charge, and another was a woman who did not know Paddock but allegedly recognized him after seeing his picture on the news.

The first witness, the man jailed for drugs, reportedly told the FBI that he or she met Paddock several weeks before the attack. According to this witness, Paddock made some alarming statements, including “Somebody has to wake up the American public and get them to arm themselves… Sometimes sacrifices have to be made.”

Paddock also reportedly “kept carrying on about anti-government stuff…FEMA stuff…and he was saying how Katrina…was just a dry run for law enforcement and military to start kicking down doors and confiscating guns.”

Another witness, again unnamed, reportedly told the FBI that she saw a man resembling Paddock in a Las Vegas diner days before the shooting. The woman told the FBI that the man was accompanied by another person, and was ranting about the government murdering innocent civilians at Ruby Ridge in 1992 and Waco in 1993—events that are said to have radicalized Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh.

However, unlike the first witness statement, the FBI’s report about the female witness did not include an affirmative identification of Paddock by name.

In its explainer, START also addressed other obvious objections to classifying Las Vegas as anti-government terrorism: Why would an anti-government terrorist shoot at country music fans, instead of government actors? And why wouldn’t Paddock leave a manifesto or any other records about why he committed his attack?

START explained this away by essentially contending that Paddock may have been playing three-dimensional chess.

“Terrorism is a strategic type of violence designed to undermine and manipulate societies and governments … As a result, these tactical decisions may initially seem counterintuitive,” START argued. “With this in mind, it is not as surprising that Paddock would target the group he thinks most likely to take up arms in response to a perceived threat… those he is trying to ‘wake up.’”

START does not address the fact that other FBI records explicitly state that Paddock was apolitical, and seemingly didn’t even own a rifle until the mid-2010s. Nor does the group mention the numerous people who actually knew Paddock and said he wasn’t driven by political ideology.

The implication of the DHS-funded classification isn’t clear. Neither the DHS nor START responded to questions about the extent to which the DHS bases its policy decisions on START’s terrorism data.

However, what is clear is that START has major influence on U.S. counterterrorism research. Media outlets have cited the group’s data, and START members have testified before Congress about domestic terrorism matters.

But despite START’s influence, other organizations have yet to agree with it about the Las Vegas shooting. Even groups such as the left-leaning ADL have said that there isn’t sufficient evidence to classify the shooting as terrorism—let alone anti-government terrorism.

“Was Stephen Paddock some sort of right-wing extremist?  A sober analysis of the information so far publicly available can only conclude that he remains mostly a mystery,” the ADL said in an article that thoroughly debunks the credibility of the above-mentioned witness statements.

“It’s worth nothing that even if Paddock had ideological ties, that does not mean his shooting spree was necessarily ideological in nature. His spree may have been spurred by mental health issues or other, still unknown, causes.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

New ‘Woke Alert’ Warns Customers of Activist Companies

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) A consumer advocacy group has launched a service to warn people about companies to be avoided because of their leftist ideology, putting a crimp on woke corporations bilking conservatives.

After Bud Light decided to destroy itself and lose billions of dollars by starting a marketing campaign with influencer Dylan Mulvaney, a man who became infamous for pretending to be a woman and, therefore, mocking actual females, many people started to think about boycotting other woke companies, according to Just The News.

People at Consumers’ Research thought about it as well and announced this week the launch of “Woke Alerts,” a digital notification service that informs users when companies start engaging in political activism. People who sign up will receive text message updates that would inform them when companies decide to show their true colors.

“In light of the recent direction taken by companies like Bud Light, Jack Daniels and Bank of America, we are launching Woke Alerts to help consumers make better-informed decisions about where to spend their money,” Consumers’ Research president Will Hild said.

“We believe companies should focus on their customers and not woke politicians and progressive activists. Nor should they be compelled to act in a certain way based on pressure from ESG extremists.”

Aside from a simple text alert, Woke Alerts will also reveal the motivations of those woke companies and highlight what is going on inside these companies that may drive activist efforts.

“Woke Alerts will inform consumers not just about a company’s decision to descend into woke activism, but it will offer insights into what’s really behind those decisions, including in some cases, the desire to mask their own objectionable behavior,” Hild said.

“We are encouraging consumers to sign up for Woke Alerts to be notified when companies cave to the woke mob – so they know the brands attacking their values.”

However, people at Consumers’ Research weren’t the pioneers in boycotting leftist companies. Among the people who started the initiative were the founders of Public SQ — an application that connects consumers to local non-woke companies — and people who created the Reclaim The Net website that helps people to find Big Tech alternatives.

Another anti-woke resource is the Cancel This Company website that not only lists woke companies to avoid, but also offers either non-political or conservative alternatives to those companies, including Big Tech alternatives, conservative news sources and other non-woke websites.

Elon Musk Says Adults Deserve ‘Prison for Life’ for Sterilizing Kids w/ Gender-Mutilating Surgery

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) Billionaire Elon Musk tweeted that any adult who deliberately sterilizes children should go to “prison for life.” 

Musk’s stinging response comes on the heels of leftist MSNBC columnist Michael Cohen’s article that slammed Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.

“Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis likes to call Florida the ‘citadel of freedom’ and the place ‘where woke goes to die.’ The reality is a policy agenda defined largely by pettiness, cruelty and a disturbing disregard for basic democratic norms,” Cohen noted. “If states are the so-called laboratory of American democracy, then Florida is the meth lab of American democracy.”

Cohen was referencing the Florida Board of Medicine and the Florida Board of Osteopathic Medicine, which at the urging of DeSantis passed a bill banning genital-mutilating surgeries and puberty-blocking hormones for minors. DeSantis and Republicans are pushing for legislation that would ban what many medical professionals consider dangerous transgender medical treatments for minors, including allowing sex-reassignment surgeries.

Musk ripped what BizPac Review called “permanent, life-altering medical treatment for gender-confused children,” citing the belief that allowing these treatments can cause more harm than good for gender dysphoric children. Musk’s opinion was praised by Republican lawmakers who see gender transition treatments as unsafe and irresponsible for children.

“Any parent or doctor who sterilizes a child before they are a consenting adult should go to prison for life,” the Twitter CEO tweeted with respect to the virtue-signaling parents and doctors, who believe that castrating or changing the sex of children is healthy.  

Conservatives applauded Musk for his recent tweet. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., said she shared the sentiment, explaining her decision to introduce the Protect Children’s Innocence Act, a law that would make gender-affirming care for those under 18 a felony.

 

“No patient (child/guardian or adult) can truly give informed consent to radical mutilating procedures and experimental hormone treatments promoted by transgender extremists,” wrote Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton. “That these procedures may be allowed by law or medical bodies is an urgent failure that must be addressed.”