EXCLUSIVE: Lawyer Involved in Waco Siege Recalls Tragedy 30 Years Later

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) For the 30th anniversary of the April 19, 1993, Waco massacre, Headline USA interviewed attorney Kirk Lyons, who represented some of the Waco victims against the U.S. government in the wake of the tragedy.

Lyons spoke about his role in helping secure legal representation for David Koresh, the leader of the Branch Davidian religious group that was besieged by federal agents for 51 days. He also provided evidence that ATF agents fired on the Davidians from helicopters during their ill-conceived raid.

Equally interesting, Lyons talked about how a CIA asset allegedly sabotaged the civil lawsuits that were filed against the U.S. government in the wake of the massacre.

But first, a disclaimer: Lyons is a highly controversial figure on all sides of the political spectrum.

He has received criticism for years over his connections to the white power movement, while also being viewed with suspicion among right-wingers due to his friendships with people such as Andreas Strassmeir—a German national suspected by some of being an agent provocateur involved in the Oklahoma City bombing.

“The right wing turned its back on me, basically. A lot of people still think I’m a CIA or Mossad agent,” said Lyons, who moved on from politics after the 1990s to focus his efforts on preserving Confederate monuments.

Nevertheless, Headline USA chose to speak to Lyons because he is a significant historical figure in the 1980s- and ‘90s-era right-wing extremism movement. He was a defense attorney in the 1987 sedition trial—one of the few sedition cases in American history, along with the ongoing Proud Boys sedition trial—he was involved in the response to the 1992 Ruby Ridge standoff, and was involved as an attorney during and after the 51-day Waco siege.

To that latter event, Lyons recalled that he received a phone call from his brother-in-law when the ATF began its botched raid on the Branch Davidians on Feb. 28, 1993. The ATF’s poorly planned raid—agents could have arrested Koresh on firearms charges when he was out jogging, but they instead decided to storm his home on Mt. Carmel—resulted in four dead federal agents and six murdered Davidians.

“I got a call that afternoon from my brother in law in Austin, said, ‘You’ve got to get on the television. The ATF has botched a raid, and they are in retreat,’” Lyons said.

A native Texan who had already taken on the U.S. government in the 1987 sedition trial, Lyons was used to involving himself in “extreme” cases like the Waco siege. His law firm at the time, CAUSE, specialized in representing what he called “dissident churches.”

“We were in touch with a lot of alternative churches, dissident churches—things like that. And we started getting calls. And they were saying, ‘Are we next?’” Lyons told Headline USA.

Lyons and his CAUSE team decided to become involved. They drove from North Carolina to Texas, arriving in Waco on the sixth day of the siege.

Lyons said he tried to talk to the FBI, but agents refused to speak to him. He also filed for a temporary restraining order against the feds—“to give peace a chance,” as he put it—but the application was dismissed by a federal judge with no explanation.

So Lyons said he endeavored to form the “Lawyers Response Committee” to gather top attorneys from around Texas.

“We felt that we needed to get the smoke-breathing, rhino-killing attorneys in Texas to line up to represent these people … to give them a reason to surrender,” Lyons said.

To that end, he already personally knew the man to eventually become Koresh’s attorney, Dick DeGuerin, having served as a witness for him in a murder trial—Lyons became a witness for DeGuerin after police wouldn’t allow his client to speak to him in jail.

“He said, ‘Kirk, I’ll represent anyone in there, as long as it’s David Koresh. But you’ve got to have his mother call me,’” Lyons said of his recruiting DeGuerin, who would enter the Branch Davidian home during the 51-day standoff. Other attorneys Lyons said he helped bring into the case included Waco’s former district attorney, Vic Feazell, and prominent lawyer John Odam.

“John [Odam] is a hero to me. He didn’t know me from Adam’s housecat, but he agreed. He said, ‘We need to give these people attorneys so they have an incentive to come out,’” Lyons said.

Along with gathering some heavy hitters, Lyons filed for a temporary restraining order against the federal agents besieging the Branch Davidians at their home. However, a judge denied Lyons’ request on March 3, 1993, without any explanation.

The next day, CAUSE issued a scathing—and prescient—press release, blasting the judge’s decision and warning that the standoff could end in “fire” if federal agents weren’t constrained by the law.

“In every federal standoff since Wounded Knee, those which used outside, neutral negotiators ended in a peaceful solution,” stated the press release, which Lyons provided to Headline USA. “Those that have not and in which the government retained control have ended in injury and death, mostly by fire.”

Tragically, that’s exactly what happened.

On April 19, 1993, FBI-sanctioned tanks and Bradley Fighting Vehicles started ramming holes into the Branch Davidians’ home, injecting highly flammable CS gas that had been outlawed by the U.S. and 99 other countries three months earlier during the January 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention in Paris. The FBI would later claim that it didn’t realize the gas had been banned at the time they deployed it against the Branch Davidians.

A massacre ensued: 76 Branch Davidians, including 25 children and two pregnant women, died in the fire.

Lyons and CAUSE represented many of the burn victims who survived, including multiple Jamaicans—a fact Lyons points to when accused of being a white supremacist. One of the victims, Oliver Gyarfas, who departed the compound on March 12, provided evidence to Lyons indicating that federal agents had fired at the Branch Davidians from helicopters—a damning fact that the U.S. government continues to deny to this day.

Gyarfas explained to Lyons that one of the Davidians, Winston Blake, had been laying in the bottom bunk of a bed on the home’s first floor. A bullet entered Blake’s head at an angle indicating that the shot had been fired from above in a helicopter, Gyarfas told Lyons.

Gyarfas provided a drawing to Lyons of the scenario, which the lawyer provided to Headline USA. The drawing has been unpublicized until now.

Waco
A drawing by one of the Waco victims, indicating that a Branch Davidian had been killed by helicopter gunfire.

Lyons used this and other evidence to file civil suits against the U.S. government in the aftermath of the massacre. However, his lawsuits were ultimately unsuccessful.

Lyons suspects the team of attorneys suing the U.S. government had a mole in its ranks. Specifically, Lyons accuses private investigator Gordon Novel of being a CIA asset who sabotaged the lawsuits.

Lyons wouldn’t be the first one to accuse Novel, who is now dead, of being a CIA asset. Novel had previously been accused of this by Jim Garrison, the New Orleans district attorney who famously investigated the JFK assassination.

Lyons said that Novel convinced the lawyer he was working for—former U.S. attorney general Ramsey Clark—to include wild conspiracy theories in the lawsuits, which were laughed out of court by judges.

“There was our team and there was the Clark team, who had Novel, the one who talked about the flame-throwing tanks, which was kooky stuff in my opinion,” Lyons said. “I think that’s where our civil cases were discredited—by the nonsense Novel put in there.”

Some 30 years later, Lyons still takes exception to the FBI-sponsored propaganda being disseminated about the Waco case and other matters he was involved in. Netflix published a documentary about Waco earlier this year, featuring FBI agents who he despises—including Bob Ricks, who was the bureau’s mouthpiece during the Waco siege.

Ricks caused a stir online with his insensitive comments to Netflix about the Waco siege—declaring that the “hostages were not the Davidians in there; the hostage in this whole process was the FBI.”

While Lyons is no longer in position to take legal action against agents such as Ricks, he did tell Headline USA a biting joke about the spokesman, who was known for always dressing to the nines and never having a hair out of place.

“We had a joke about Bob Ricks because he wore all these turtle-neck sweaters,” Lyons said. “So, we said, ‘Why does Bob Ricks keep wearing turtle-neck sweaters all the time? It’s to keep the foreskin from rolling up over his head.’”

A previous version of this story identified one of the lawyers involved in the Waco litigation as John Doss. The lawyer’s name is actually John Odam.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Rules for Thee: Another Biden Official Caught Breaking Federal Law, Disciplinary Action Unlikely

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra violated the Hatch Act, the Office of Special Counsel found, marking yet another instance of a Biden official violating federal law.

Special Counsel Henry Kerner delivered a scathing letter to President Joe Biden, saying that Becerra violated federal law by publicly endorsing the re-election campaign of leftist U.S. Senator Alex Padilla, D-Calif., in his official capacity as the HHS secretary.

“As explained in the accompanying report, OSC concluded that Secretary Becerra violated the Hatch Act by expressing support for Senator Alex Padilla’s reelection while speaking in his official capacity at the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute Annual Awards Gala on September 15, 2022,” Kerner said.

“The Hatch Act prohibits federal employees from using their official authority or influence to affect the outcome of an election,” Kerner continued. “In delivering his speech, Secretary Becerra impermissibly mixed his personal electoral preferences with official remarks. While federal employees are permitted to express support for candidates when speaking in their personal capacity, the Hatch Act restricts employees from doing so when speaking as a government official.”

Padilla was appointed to the U.S. Senate by leftist California Gov. Gavin Newsom as a replacement for then-U.S. Senator Kamala Harris.

Becerra attempted to downplay the scathing findings, describing his federal offense as an “inadvertent violation.”

“While I did not realize at the time that my off-the-cuff remarks concerning my personal voting intentions were in violation of the Hatch Act, I now understand why they were not permitted,” he claimed in statements to the Democrat-friendly Washington Post.

Becerra’s violation wouldn’t mark the first time a Biden official violated the Hatch Act. In March 2021, Department of Housing and Urban Development Marcia Fudge received a slap on the wrist for engaging in a prohibited election talk during a March 2021 press conference at the White House, the New York Post reported at the time.

In October 2021, the government watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington accused former White House press secretary Jen Psaki of violating the Hatch Act by saying President Biden supported the leftist campaign of Terry McAuliffe in Virginia’s gubernatorial election in 2021.

Former White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain violated federal law when he retweeted a political message on his official government account. Klein removed the tweet after being notified of the violation and faced no disciplinary action over it.

“Although OSC has concluded that Mr. Klain violated the Hatch Act, as explained below, we have decided not to pursue disciplinary action and instead issued him a warning letter,” the OSC told the former Trump adviser Stephen Miller, who now leads America First Legal.

In contrast, the OSC demanded the removal of former Trump White House counselor Kellyanne Conway after she violated the Hatch Act by “disparaging Democratic presidential candidates while speaking in her official capacity during television interviews and on social media.”

Given the OSC’s record of soft-balling Biden officials, it is unlikely that Becerra will face disciplinary action for his violation.

Bud Light’s Anheuser-Busch Accused of Racist Practices

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) Embattled on multiple fronts and bleeding billions after a botched transgender advertising blitz, Anheuser-Busch, the parent company of woke, tanking beer brand Bud Light, is now facing charges of racism.

America First Legal, a conservative advocacy group, filed a a federal civil rights complaint against the company, accusing the beer titan of engaging in discriminatory practices in the name of “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” However, it does not include all people.

The complaint alleged that Anheuser-Busch failed in championing diversity and inclusivity by creating a leadership accelerator program that company officials claim was designed to equip and mentor employees “who identify with historically underrepresented groups as they join our organization in a full-time capacity,” the Daily Wire reported.

“Only specific individuals of specified races, colors, and national origins – notably excluding White and Asian Americans – are invited to apply,” AFL said of the program.

AFL also alleged that the company “advertises an unlawful race-based scholarship and internship program launched by Budweiser and the United Negro College Fund to ‘support 25 Black college students’ interested in the brewing industry and to ‘provide five Black college students with real-world experience as interns in Anheuser-Busch’s Brewery Trainee Program.’”

Noting that the company’s most recent annual report included an initiative to increase
“overall representation of women in top leadership positions,” America First Legal said the company failed to define what it means by the term “women.”

“As the corporation responsible for Bud Light, and as an eager and willing partner with and funder of ‘transgender activist’ and biological male Dylan Mulvaney, it is safe to assume that the company’s definition of a woman is not limited to biological females,” AFL wrote.

“Iconic American brands, like Anheuser-Busch, have become shells of their founders’ visions due to weak-kneed corporate leadership who routinely cave to idealogues whose thirst for an ever-changing notion of ‘social justice’ is relentless,” America First Legal Vice President and General Counsel Gene Hamilton said in a statement.

Hamilton said that Anheuser-Busch isn’t just promoting a radical transgender agenda that is at odds with the values of their customers, but “they’re also engaged in something even more insidious and destructive, and that’s hiring based on race and sex.” 

“America First Legal reviewed their corporate materials and other publicly available information, revealing that Anheuser-Busch appears more interested in hiring someone because of their race than their skillset,” Hamilton said.

GOP Senators Demand TikTok Ban for Congressional Members

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Republican lawmakers demanded House and Senate committees ban members of Congress from using the Chinese communist-tied TikTok app for government-related purposes, citing national security and privacy concerns. 

Senators Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., along with Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, led the bicameral group in calling on their colleagues “to lead by example” by ceasing their use of the CCP-tied TikTok app. The lawmakers also called on Senate and House rules to be amended to prohibit all members of Congress from using the controversial app in a letter sent to committee leaders.

“It is troublesome that some members continue to disregard these clear warnings and are even encouraging their constituents to use TikTok to interface with their elected representatives – especially since some of these users are minors,” the members said in statements received by Headline USA.

“We feel this situation warrants further action to protect the privacy of both sensitive congressional information and the personal information of our constituents,” the lawmakers continued. “To that end, we urge you to enact a change to the Senate and House rules to ban members of Congress from using TikTok for official use.”

The letter comes weeks after TikTok CEO Shou Chew was grilled before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on the Chinese-tied app’s handling of U.S. consumers’ data.  Sen. Blackburn, along with other GOP officials, has been vocal in her support for a complete ban of the TikTok app, citing dangers to children and its ties to the Chinese communist government. GOP lawmakers argue that China can access the mass data of U.S. citizens who use the TikTok app.

A British data protection agency, for instance, slapped TikTok with a $15.9 million fine after the CCP-tied app misused the data of children.

“TikTok ‘did not do enough’ to check who was using their platform and take sufficient action to remove the underage children that were,” said British official John Edwards, who led the probe of TikTok. “The ICO investigation found that a concern was raised internally with some senior employees about children under 13 using the platform and not being removed. In the ICO’s view TikTok did not respond adequately. TikTok should have known better. TikTok should have done better.” 

Thirty-one U.S. states, including the U.S. military, greenlighted banning TikTok from government-owned devices. Several foreign governments have also banned the app from government devices, including Australia, Canada, the European Parliament and the European Commission. 

Even Democrat officials are pushing for tighter measures against TikTok, with Senator Mark Warner, D-Va., crediting former President Donald Trump for raising concerns over TikTok two years ago.

“As painful as it is for me to say, if Donald Trump was right and we could’ve taken action then, that’d have been a heck of a lot easier than trying to take action in November of 2022,” Warner said. “The sooner we bite the bullet, the better.”

President Joe Biden, after initially reversing a Trump-era order to ban TikTok, threatened TikTok with a complete ban if it failed to sever its financial ties with its parent company, ByteDance, which has members of the CPP on its committee.

It is unknown whether congressional leaders will move forward with an internal TikTok ban. But the such move could face pushback from leftist Democrats, some of which have argued that the app is useful to recruit voters.

Biden announced an initiative earlier this month to recruit social media influencers in an effort to increase the White House’s reach. The list of influencers included two TikTok stars, prompting critics to argue that Biden is contradicting his own administration’s concerns over TikTok.

Signers of the Blackburn-Tillis-Crenshaw letter also include Senator Rick Scott, R-Fla., and Representatives Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., Troy Balderson, R-Ohio, Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., Earl L. “Buddy” Carter, R-Ga., Randy Weber, R-Texas, Michael Guest, R-Miss., Greg Pence, R-Ind., Glenn Grothman, R-Wis., Randy Feenstra, R-Iowa, John Moolenaar, R-Mich., Max Miller, R-Ohio, Rick W. Allen, R-Ga., and Jack Bergman, R-Mich. 

Read the full letter here. 

Champion Swimmer Riley Gaines Roasts Biden’s ‘Trans’ Sports Rule

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) President Joe Biden’s Department of Education this month proposed a rule that would override state laws protecting females in sports and force them to compete against men who pretend to be members of the opposite sex.

The DOE aims to change Title IX to bar schools from adopting or enforcing policies that categorically bar transgender students from participating on teams consistent with their made-up “gender identity,” reported the Gateway Pundit.

Currently, 19 states have laws that ban males from competing in female sports, but this new rule would stop states from exercising their rights and force them to allow people transgender swimmer William “Lia” Thomas to compete against females. As such, legal analysts contend this would violate the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution, which protects states’ rights.

Thomas praised the rule that would allow transgenders to continue infringing on competitions and snatching wins that belong to actual women, boasting in a video that the swimmer uploaded on social media to gloat over the DOE’s unconstitutional proposal.

Former NCAA champion female swimmer Riley Gaines immediately spoke out against Thomas and Biden’s actions.

“Under the guise of competitive fairness? Are you really trying to say you would have won a national title against the men? Does it not break your heart to see women lose out on these opportunities?” she wrote. “The Biden administration’s proposed bill denies science, truth and common sense.”

She then again directly criticized the Biden regime in another tweet, promising to post guidance for ways for people to respond to the injustice.

“This take is selfish and shows an utter disregard for women. The Biden Administration is actively and aggressively working to pass laws that erase decent and fair treatment for women in sports,” she wrote. “I’ll post a link for the comments + guidance on how to respond soon.”

T. Rex Skeleton Expected to Fetch Millions at Zurich Auction

(Headline USA) Interested investors may have to dig deep into their pockets to claim a giant Tyrannosaurus rex skeleton going up for auction on Tuesday — a first in Europe — that’s been dug up from three sites in the United States and could make the ultimate ornament for a tycoon’s abode or other eye-popping display.

The 293 T. rex bones, assembled and erected into a growling 38-foot-long and 12.8-foot-high posture, are expected to fetch $5.6-$8.9 million when it goes under the hammer at a Zurich auction house.

Promoters say the composite T. rex — dubbed “Trinity” and drawn from three sites in the Hell Creek and Lance Creek formations of Montana and Wyoming — was built from specimens retrieved between 2008 and 2013.

More than half of the restored fossil is “original bone material,” and Koller auction house says the skull is particularly rare and was remarkably well-preserved.

“When dinosaurs died in the Jurassic or Cretaceous periods, they often lost their heads during deposition. In fact, most dinosaurs are found without their skulls,” Nils Knoetschke, a scientific adviser who was quoted in the auction catalogue. “But here we have truly original Tyrannosaurus skull bones that all originate from the same specimen.”

T. rex roamed the Earth between 65 and 67 million years ago, and Hollywood movies — perhaps epitomized by the blockbuster Jurassic Park franchise — have added to the public fascination with the carnivorous creature.

The same areas were the source of two other dinosaurs skeletons that also went on the block, says Koller: “Sue” sold for $8.4 million over a quarter-century ago, and “Stan” fetched nearly $32 million three years ago.

Tuesday’s sale, part of a wider auction of artifacts, marks only the third time such a T. rex skeleton has gone up for auction, Koller says.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

NIH Gives $2.2B to Foreign Animal Testing Labs That Lack Oversight

(Adam Andrzejewski, RealClear Wire) There are disturbing gaps in oversight at overseas labs that use animals in experiments. Labs to which the National Institutes of Health has given $2.2 billion in contracts and grants from 2011 to 2021, according to a recent report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.

The report found that while the NIH requires these foreign labs to file annual reports attesting to their compliance with U.S. animal testing guidelines, it “doesn’t verify the reliability of the information in these reports.”

When they receive U.S. funding, labs must meet U.S. and international standards for humane and ethical experimentation on animals, and comply with all local regulations. The GAO found that while the NIH has the capacity and resources to identify and investigate risks before and while the money is awarded, “because the award recipients self-generate the information in the annual reports, there are risks that any animal welfare issues may be misrepresented.”

The GAO makes the obvious recommendation that the NIH should take steps “such as conducting site visits or requiring third-party verification” to mitigate the risk of misrepresentation. Requiring third-party verification would cost the U.S. nothing, and could make a big difference in ensuring all labs receiving funds are following the proper guidelines.

With an annual budget of $45 billion, it is unacceptable that the NIH can’t be bothered with basic oversight to ensure taxpayer money isn’t funding inhumane animal testing.

Defense Dept. Warns Biden’s Offshore Wind Turbines are ‘Highly Problematic’

(Victor Skinner, The Center Square) The U.S. Department of Defense is raising concerns about the Biden administration’s “highly problematic” plans for wind projects off the Atlantic coast, citing potential conflicts with the Dare County bombing range used to train fighter jet crews and other operations.

Maps shared with industry stakeholders that were first reported by Bloomberg News show large portions of areas the Interior Department earmarked for off-shore wind leases last year shaded in red, illustrating areas deemed “highly problematic” for the Navy and Air Force.

The Defense Department contends wind turbines attached to the Atlantic seabed would create challenges for military operations and facilities nearby, including the Dare County bombing range and a Yorktown, Virginia, weapons station.

The conflicts involve four of six potential wind lease areas identified by the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management last year that are highly problematic shaded red, and two tracts in yellow that will require further study.

The situation poses serious problems for President Joe Biden’s goal of installing 30 gigawatts of off-shore wind power by 2030, as well as plans in Atlantic coast states to develop wind farms as a means of meeting clean energy goals.

In North Carolina, Gov. Roy Cooper has touted wind energy as a key to meeting the state’s goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 70% below 2005 levels by 2030, and to attain carbon neutrality by 2050.

Cooper signed an executive order in 2021 to establish offshore wind development goals of 2.8 gigawatts off the North Carolina coast by 2030 and 8 gigawatts by 2040.

“Offshore wind power will help North Carolina create jobs and generate economic development while helping us transition to a clean energy economy,” Cooper said when he unveiled the goals. “North Carolina’s national leadership in clean energy and manufacturing plus our highly trained workforce create a strong business environment for offshore wind supply chain and manufacturing companies.”

Cooper estimated the industry would invest $140 billion in projects from North Carolina up the Atlantic coast by 2036.

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management last year awarded two roughly 55,000 square acre tracts south of Bald Head Island to Duke Energy and TotalEnergies for wind development, adding to another off the northern Outer Banks awarded to Avangrid Renewables.

Data from the U.S. Department of Energy shows North Carolina is home to more than 20 active wind-related manufacturing facilities.

The bureau said in a statement the agency “has a long working relationship” with the Department of Defense and “together we have successfully deconflicted and identified areas that have resulted in 27 leases along the Atlantic coast, covering over 2.1 million acres,” Bloomberg reports. “We will continue this collaboration as we week to identify new lease areas in the central Atlantic.”

An unnamed senior Defense Department official also told the news site the Pentagon is committed to working with the bureau to resolve the issues. The department is now focused on finding ways to accommodate wind development, which could involve changing operations, such as shifting the location of military exercises or optimizing equipment to avoid interference from turbines.

The Interior Department planned to sell new offshore wind rights in the area next year. Similar conflicts between military operations and off-shore wind leasing along the California coast in 2019 took several years to resolve.

“Earlier this year, other members of the North Carolina delegation and I encouraged a whole-of-government approach to offshore wind leasing that includes input from various ocean users in the Carolinas and Central Atlantic coast, including the Department of Defense which operates important training operations off the coast of North Carolina,” said Congresswoman Deborah Ross in an email to The Center Square.

“While it’s clear that we still have more work and stakeholder consultation ahead, I am confident that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and the Biden administration will work together with the Department of Defense and other federal agencies to advance offshore wind development and mitigate concerns from various ocean users, including our military.”

Fla. AG Wants Investigation into Biden’s Handling of Minors Trafficked to U.S.

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody called on Congress on Tuesday to investigate the Biden administration for what she described as “subjecting unaccompanied minors to human trafficking.”

Moody did so after reporting the findings of a Florida statewide grand jury “documenting horrible conditions unaccompanied minors experience because of the Biden administration’s failed policies and lack of oversight.”

“A Florida Grand Jury found shocking and horrific evidence of the Biden administration facilitating human trafficking and child exploitation of unaccompanied minors,” Moody said. “It should enrage everyone that any child is being exposed to such dangerous and terrible conditions. I’m calling on Congress to conduct hearings to further the investigation and uncover the evidence that HHS refused to provide to Florida’s Statewide Grand Jury.”

This is the second time she’s called on Congress to act in a week. Last week, she called on Congress to impeach Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, claiming he’s violated federal law, lied multiple times under oath before Congress, and is endangering American lives.

In her letter sent to the leaders of the House and Senate this week, she implored them to convene hearings to investigate the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Department of Health and Human Services over its handling and placement of unaccompanied foreign national children in the U.S. after whistle blowers alleged abuse and exploitation and after the findings of the grand jury report were released.

The grand jury’s report details how these federal agencies are facilitating and overseeing the placement of unaccompanied minors who’ve illegally entered the U.S. to be placed with unrelated individuals and put in situations “where they are subject to abuse, including rape, molestation, and effectively forced to work to pay for their travel to the United States in violation of child labor laws,” her letter states. “Congress should convene hearings and act to prevent any child from being assaulted or exploited.”

A Honduran man claiming to be a minor illegally entered Texas and was placed with a sponsor in Jacksonville, whom he subsequently killed. After local Florida law enforcement discovered he was actually 24, Gov. Ron DeSantis petitioned the Florida Supreme Court to empanel a grand jury to investigate criminal or wrongful activity relating to the smuggling or endangerment of unaccompanied children in the country illegally. Last June, the state supreme court granted his petition and empaneled a statewide grand jury. It launched its investigation six months ago.

On March 29, it released its third presentment, which describes the operations of HHS’s Office of Refugee Resettlement “trafficking children throughout the United States to be sexually abused or forced into unlawful child labor,” Moody said, citing the findings of the report. ORR was “fully focused on maximizing the number of children they can process, heedless of the downstream consequences to either the children or the communities into which they are jettisoned,” the grand jury found.

The grand jury also found that ORR and other federal agencies encouraged unaccompanied children “to undertake and/or be subjected to a harrowing trek to our border, ultimately abandoning significant numbers of those who survive the journey to an uncertain fate with persons who are largely unvetted.” They also found they were exposed “to horrifying health conditions, constant criminal threat, labor and sex trafficking, robbery, rape, and other experiences not done justice by mere words.”

They found that DHS and HHS didn’t cross reference their databases to detect whether someone was falsely claiming to be a minor or had previously illegally entered the U.S. They also found that ORR hired case managers with “no experience,” were “provided little to no training” and “are actively discouraged from independently investigating” legitimate addresses where the minors were sent. Some case managers testified they were ordered by ORR not to verify the addresses, according to the report.

Under the Biden administration, HHS eliminated the proof of address requirement for potential sponsors, they also found. Case managers testified that they didn’t visit home placements or that addresses approved included strip clubs or non-residential addresses.

Children testified before the grand jury that they were “pimped out” by someone claiming to be a family member they didn’t know, or they were forced to drop out of school to work to pay off debt owed to smugglers.

Moody points out that Biden administration officials in HHS “refused to provide documents or produce witnesses before the Grand Jury and apparently actively encouraged the Florida entities with which it has contracted to not cooperate with the Grand Jury,” noting that, “Presumably, HHS and DHS will not be as flippant and obstructive to Congress as they were with the Grand Jury.”

She called on congressional leaders regardless of party affiliation to fully investigate the agencies, suggesting, “surely we can agree that facilitating sexual assault and child labor is reprehensible.”

Moody also said there needs to be greater transparency about ORR placement with the states. Flying children into states “in the dark of night or otherwise keeping the States in the dark, in the end, just harms the children involved and that is inexcusable and disgraceful,” she said.

Washington State Votes to Hide Transgender Runaways from Parents

(Robert Jonathan, Headline USA) A bill passed in the Democrat-controlled Washington state legislature created an exception to the requirement that licensed youth shelters, host homes and other such facilities must alert parents that their minor child has checked in.

Under state senate bill 5599, parents need not be notified within an otherwise required maximum of 72 hours under current law when a minor is seeking or receiving so-called gender-affirming treatment, which is considered a “compelling reason” to keep families out of the loop.

Gender-affirming care, also known as genital mutilation, comes under the heading of “protected healthcare services” as indicated in the legislation. Abortion is reportedly another.

Democrats claim that they are “protecting” transgender youth who are seeking “life-saving care” particularly when their families aren’t necessarily supportive of same.

Far-left Gov. Jay Inslee is likely to sign the bill into law, which has been criticized as a way to hide kids’ whereabouts from their moms and dads, and thus remove the parental ability to give consent to life-alternating invasive medical procedures, after the state house and senate resolve certain differences in the text.

The House version requires licensed shelters to notify the Department of Children, Youth and Families instead of the parents or legal guardians.

“For minors, ‘affirming care’ typically included puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries. It was unclear which services would be approved under the bill,” Fox News explained.

Republican State Rep. Jim Walsh condemned the legislation that was jammed through by the lower chamber on a strict party-line vote, after having previously been approved in the senate.

“Among its many flaws, the bill assumes families that don’t ‘affirm’ a child’s short-term desires are being abusive. Wrong! Sometimes love requires parents to not affirm their child’s whims. Loving parents guide their children as they grow. Sometimes that means saying ‘no,'” Walsh said in a statement.

“Parents are the primary stakeholders in their children’s upbringing―not the government.”

Walsh’s colleague, State Rep. Chris Corry, similarly described the bill as “a fundamental violation of parental rights.”

He added that “if your child goes missing…over an argument or disagreement, what most parents in Washington state would go to the ends of the earth to find their child. And the fact that we have a bill that may become law, that would say, ‘we’re not going to tell you,’ was really just a bridge too far for us.”

Democrats defeated a series of amendments offered by the GOP including one that incorporated a common-sense distinction between child abuse and a parent-child disagreement.

In a video update, GOP House leader J.T. Wilcox characterized the bill as a “disaster.”

GOP State Rep. Skyler Rude separately asserted that “I want any trans people out there listening to know I support them; I feel comfortable saying my caucus supports them. My concerns are really around age to give consent and make these decisions, and parents should… at least be provided the chance to be involved in those decision.”

Washington is also a state that allows transgender male inmates in female prisons.

Earlier this month, Inslee signed a bill into law that would let transgender individuals seal court records when it comes to a name change.

In general, court records are open to the public unless a judge rules otherwise.