New Mexico Catholics Struggle to Maintain Historic Churches

(Headline USA) Ever since Catholic missionaries started building churches out of mud 400 years ago, tiny mountain communities like Cordova relied on their own resources to keep the faith going.

Thousands of miles from religious and lay seats of power, everything from priests to sculptors to paint pigments was hard to come by. Villagers instituted lay church caretakers called “mayordomos,” and filled chapels with elaborate altarpieces made of local wood and varnished with pine sap.

Today, threatened by depopulation, dwindling congregations and fading traditions, some of their descendants are fighting to save these historic adobe structures from literally crumbling back to the earth they were built with.

“Our ancestors put blood and sweat in this place for us to have Jesus present. This is the root of my faith,” said Angelo Sandoval on a chilly spring day inside the 1830s church of St. Anthony, where he serves as mayordomo in his native Cordova. “We’re not just a church, we’re not just a religion – we have roots.”

From the local dirt they’re made of to the generations of family memories they hold, these churches anchor a uniquely New Mexican way of life for their communities, many of which no longer have schools or stores, and struggle with chronic poverty and addiction.

An estimated 500 Catholic mission churches remain in northern New Mexico, where the Rocky Mountains taper off into desert mesas to the west and endless plains to the east.

It’s becoming increasingly difficult to find the necessary investment – hundreds of thousands of dollars, plus specialized conservation skills and families willing to serve as mayordomos – to preserve them, especially since most are used for only a few services each year.

“It’s truly a labor of love,” said the Rev. Rob Yaksich, pastor of Our Lady of Sorrows in Las Vegas, New Mexico, which oversees 23 rural churches, most in adobe, spread over a large territory. “When the faithful generation is gone, are they going to be a museum or serve their purpose? This old, deep-rooted Spanish Catholicism is experiencing serious disruption.”

Fidel Trujillo is mayordomo of the pink-stuccoed San José church in the hamlet of Ledoux where he grew up. With his wife and other family members, he keeps it spotless even though only two Masses per year are celebrated here regularly.

“Our ‘antepasados’ (ancestors) did a tremendous job in handing over the faith, and it’s our job now,” Trujillo said. While he’s also active in the main parish in the nearby town of Mora, he brings his children, 6 and 4, as often as he can to San José.

“This serves as a retreat and grounding for us,” he added. “I much prefer coming to these ‘capillas’ (chapels). It’s a compass that guides where your heart really belongs.”

Each mission church is devoted to a particular saint, for whom the community develops special veneration. When New Mexico’s largest wildfire last spring charred forests close to the San José church, and Trujillo was displaced for a month, he took the statue of St. Joseph with him.

In the small town of Bernalillo, Catholic faithful have kept a vow to St. Lawrence for more than 300 years that includes one family each year setting up an altar with his image in their home – and making it available 24/7 to anyone who wants to pray.

“They have knocked at my door at 2 a.m. and I’ve let them in,” said mayordoma Barbara Finley.

Her home is near the historic adobe Santuario de San Lorenzo, which the community fought to keep even though a larger church was built next door.

“Four hundred years ago, life was very difficult in this part of the world, the remote inland frontier of the Spanish empire,” explained Felix López, a master “santero” – the artists who sculpt, paint and conserve saint figures in New Mexico’s unique devotional style, born of historical isolation. “People needed these ‘santos.’ They were a source of comfort and refuge.”

In intervening centuries, most were stolen, sold or damaged, according to Bernadette Lucero, director, curator and archivist for the Archdiocese of Santa Fe, which has inventories of its hundreds of churches since the 1600s.

But how much these expressive sculptures and paintings still matter to local communities is evident where they survive in original form, as they do at the mission churches in Cordova, Truchas and Las Trampas on the mountain road from Santa Fe to Taos.

“Saints are the spiritual go-to; they can be highly powerful,” said Victor Goler, a master santero who just completed conserving the altarpieces, or “reredos,” in Las Trampas’ mid-18th century church. “It’s important for the community to have a connection. Their feeling is a lot deeper and that’s what keeps it going.”

On a recent Sunday at Truchas’ 1760s Holy Rosary church, López pointed out the rich decorative details that centuries of smoke and grime had hidden until he meticulously removed them with the absorbent inside of sourdough bread.

“I’m a devout Catholic, and I do this as meditation, as a form of prayer,” said López, who’s been a santero for five decades and whose family hails from this village perched on a ridge at 7,000 feet (2,100 meters).

A few miles down the valley in Cordova, Jerry Sandoval – another santero and the mayordomo’s uncle — says a prayer to each saint before starting to sculpt their image out of pine, cottonwood or aspen. He then paints them with natural pigments – purple is made of crushed bugs, for example – and varnishes them with the sap of piñon, the stocky pine tree that dots the countryside.

He also helped conserve the colorful, centuries-old reredos at the local church, where many children come back for traditional Christmas and Easter prayers – giving both Sandovals hope that the younger generations will learn to be attached to their church.

“They see all this,” Jerry Sandoval said in front of the richly decorated altarpieces from St. Anthony church. “Lots of people call it tradition, but we call it faith.”

For the Rev. Sebastian Lee, who as administrator of the popular Santuario de Chimayó complex a few miles away also oversees these mission churches, fostering local attachment is a daunting challenge as congregations shrink even faster since the COVID-19 pandemic.

“I want missions to be where people can taste culture and religiosity. They’re very healing, you’re soaked with people’s faith,” Lee said as pilgrims filed past his tiny adobe-walled office into the main sanctuary at Chimayó. “I wonder how to help them, because sooner or later one mission is not going to have enough people.”

The archdiocese’s Catholic Foundation provides small grants, and several organizations have been founded to help conservation efforts.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Biden Admin. Wants to Regulate AI, Implement Woke Initiatives

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The Biden administration decided to implement artificial intelligence regulations as another push for their leftist ideology.

According to the Post Millennial, the Biden administration wants to install AI that will center around the so-called “civil rights” and “equal opportunity” to fight the “unlawful bias.”

Following the release of a joint statement between the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Justice‘s Civil Rights Division, the US Equal Opportunity Employment Commission and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the plans were made public on Tuesday.

“Today, the use of automated systems, including those sometimes marketed as ‘artificial intelligence’ or ‘AI,’ is becoming increasingly common in our daily lives. We use the term ‘automated systems’ broadly to mean software and algorithmic processes, including AI, that are used to automate workflows and help people complete tasks or make decisions.”

“Private and public entities use these systems to make critical decisions that impact individuals’ rights and opportunities, including fair and equal access to a job, housing, credit opportunities and other goods and services.”

“These automated systems are often advertised as providing insights and breakthroughs, increasing efficiencies and cost-savings, and modernizing existing practices. Although many of these tools offer the promise of advancement, their use also has the potential to perpetuate unlawful bias, automate unlawful discrimination, and produce other harmful outcomes,” the statement added.

Even though many people are concerned about the increased use of AI and its bias toward conservative political viewpoints — with ChatGPT being the infamous example — the Biden administration doesn’t care.

Lina Khan, a chair of the FTC who was appointed by the Biden administration, will issue regulations that favor leftist views under the guise of combatting “historical bias.”

“Automated system outcomes can be skewed by unrepresentative or imbalanced datasets, datasets that incorporate historical bias, or datasets that contain other types of errors,” according to the statement.

“Automated systems also can correlate data with protected classes, which can lead to discriminatory outcomes.”

Federal Judge Allows Lawsuit Against Google to Continue

(Headline USA) A federal judge on Friday rejected a motion from Google to toss out the government’s antitrust case against it.

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled the lawsuit alleging Google wields monopolistic power in the world of online advertising can proceed in its entirety.

Her ruling is the second setback for Google at the federal court in Alexandria. Google had earlier tried to get the case consolidated with a similar lawsuit that’s been ongoing for several years in New York. But Brinkema ruled last month that the case can proceed in the Alexandria courthouse, which is known as the “Rocket Docket” for its reputation of adjudicating disputes swiftly.

The lawsuit alleges that Google holds a monopoly in online advertising that works to the detriment of consumers. The complaint alleged that Google “corrupted legitimate competition in the ad tech industry by engaging in a systematic campaign to seize control of the wide swath of high-tech tools used by publishers, advertisers, and brokers, to facilitate digital advertising.”

Google argued that the case should be tossed out, in part because the government defines Google’s alleged monopoly too narrowly. Google’s lawyers contend the lawsuit does not account for advertisers’ ability, for example, to advertise on huge social media platforms that run their own advertising platforms independent of Google.

In court papers, Google made an analogy to an unsuccessful antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation, a concert promoter that owns and operates a large number of outdoor amphitheaters.

The lawsuit alleged Live Nation held a monopoly on amphitheaters, but a judge ruled that the plaintiffs failed to prove a monopoly in part because they did not take into account reasonable alternatives to amphitheater venues, like indoor concert halls and arenas.

Brinkema said the question of how to define the market in which Google allegedly holds a monopoly will be a key issue in the case, But she said at this preliminary stage, the government’s allegations are plausible enough for the case to move forward. The government’s burden of proof, though, will increase at trial.

After the hearing, Google issued a statement from Dan Taylor, its vice president of global ads, saying the lawsuit “ignores the reality of today’s dynamic digital advertising space, where we compete against hundreds of companies like Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft and TikTok.”

The statement said the lawsuit “would slow innovation, raise advertising fees, and make it harder for thousands of small businesses and publishers to grow.”

A number of states, including Virginia, California, Colorado, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and Tennessee, have joined in the case as plaintiffs against Google.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Dem. Caught Regulating Pot Companies While Working for Them

(Headline USA) Oregon’s Democratic Secretary of State Shemia Fagan is in hot water, with Republican lawmakers calling for her resignation and the Democratic governor seeking investigations because Fagan took a consulting job with a marijuana firm.

The matter came to a head Friday after Fagan’s office released an audit of the state’s marijuana regulators, the Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission. The audit called for the OLCC to “reform” some rules for marijuana businesses, saying they are “burdens” when combined with federal restrictions on interstate commerce, banking and taxation.

Fagan, a Democrat, recused herself from the audit because she is a paid consultant of an affiliate of marijuana retail chain La Mota, Fagan’s spokesman Ben Morris said at a virtual news conference about the audit’s release.

La Mota’s co-owner has hosted fundraisers for top Democratic Oregon politicians, including Fagan, while the co-owner, her partner and their business allegedly owe $1.7 million in unpaid bills and more in state and federal taxes, according to Willamette Week, a Portland newspaper.

Fagan didn’t appear at the news conference, which included her spokesman, deputy and the audits director. News of the consultancy was first reported Thursday by Willamette Week.

Morris denied Fagan’s outside work represented a conflict of interest and said Oregon Government Ethics Commission guidelines specifically allow public officials to maintain private employment.

But hours after the audit press conference, Republican legislative leaders, who are in the minority in the Legislature, called for Fagan to resign over the consulting job.

“This appears to be an ethics violation and if it isn’t then Oregon’s ethics laws are broken,” Senate Republican leader Tim Knopp and House Republican leader Vikki Breese-Iverson said in a joint statement.

Gov. Tina Kotek, a Democrat, indicated she had concerns later on Friday.

“It’s critical that Oregonians trust their government,” Kotek said in an emailed statement.

Kotek said she was urging the Oregon Government Ethics Commission “to immediately investigate this situation” and asked the Oregon Department of Justice to examine the audit.

The audit questioned the OLCC’s requirement that marijuana businesses keep their stash behind steel doors and have 24-hour video surveillance systems. The OLCC should make marijuana regulations more like those governing distilled spirits, which the agency also regulates, the auditors said.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

MURDOCK: Dems Colluded w/ Deep State to Push the REAL ‘Big Lie’ on Laptop from Hell

(Deroy Murdock, Headline USA) Democrats whine on and on about “The Big Lie.”

In their minds, this phrase summarizes President Donald J. Trump’s argument that vote fraud, ballot irregularities and ninth-inning rules changes sank his 2020 re-election bid.

However, Democrats are mum about the Big Lie that slimed Joe Biden into the White House.

Former CIA Acting Director Michael Morrell recently sang like a sparrow to the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees. He explained how he, Biden’s presidential campaign and top U.S. spies bamboozled the American people less than three weeks before Election Day.

Biden’s Big Lie was decisive. In its absence, polls show, he would not be president. Instead, Biden would be in Delaware, driving the 1967 Corvette that he parked in the garage of his Wilmington mansion, right beside boxes of illegally stored classified records.

  • On Oct. 14, 2020, the New York Post exposed Hunter Biden’s so-called Laptop from Hell. Its emails and other contents uncovered Hunter’s international influence peddling and dodgy deals while his father was vice president.
  • That Oct. 17: Biden campaign adviser Antony Blinken, now U.S. secretary of state, rang Morrell about the Post’s exclusive. Morrell swiftly orchestrated “A Public Statement on the Hunter Biden Emails.”
  • Oct. 19: This communique, signed by Morrell and 50 other former intelligence leaders, said: “…the arrival on the US political scene of emails purportedly belonging to Vice President Biden’s son Hunter…has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” It added: “If we are right, this is Russia trying to influence how Americans vote in this election…” (Their emphasis.)

The regime media echoed loyally, as Politico’s headline typified: “Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former officials say.”

  • Oct. 22: In the second of two presidential debates, Biden deployed the Blinken–Morrell statement to rebuff Trump’s accusations of Hunter’s (and, thus, Joe’s) corruption.

“Look, there are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what this, [sic] he’s [Trump’s] accusing me of is a Russian plan,” Biden said. “…five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage.”

Morrell testified that Biden campaign chairman Steve Ricchetti soon phoned him: “Steve thanked me for putting the statement out.”

The “Russian disinformation” label was a Big Lie.

In a Feb. 1, 2023 letter, Hunter’s attorney Abbe Lowell conceded that the Laptop from Hell stored “hundreds of gigabytes of Mr. Biden’s personal data.”

CBS News and the Washington Post also authenticated the laptop as Hunter’s.

Alas, Biden’s Big Lie, based on a letter filled with lies, convinced millions of voters that Trump was hallucinating or, even worse, helping Russia steal the White House.

Twitter, Facebook and other social-media giants cited Morrell–Blinken to censor online discussion of this story. Twitter even padlocked the New York Post’s account.

Mission accomplished: The Laptop from Hell got zipped into a digital body bag. Most Americans heard little to nothing about Hunter’s computer and its explosive contents.

Biden’s Big Lie got him elected.

According to a Nov. 24, 2020, Media Research Center/Polling Company survey of 1,750 Biden voters in seven swing states, 45.1% were unaware of Hunter’s laptop.

Among these voters, 9.4% said that such knowledge would have switched their votes from Biden to Trump, a third-party candidate or nobody.

Had Biden lost these votes, Trump would have secured Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin; 311 Electoral College votes, and four more years as president.

Last December, TIPP Insights polled 501 adults who followed the Biden-graft story. TIPP asked: “Would knowing the laptop contents were real and not ‘disinformation’ have changed your vote?”

“Very likely,” 28% replied.

Assuming, logically, that Hunter’s laptop would have cost Biden votes, losing 28% of his ballots (or even 14%) would have crushed Biden’s chances.

These surveys confirm that Biden’s Big Lie worked. It deceived enough Americans to back Biden and boot Trump.

This cynical, naked, bald-faced Big Lie is the putrid foundation beneath Joe Biden’s presidency.

Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor.

GOP, Election Integrity Score Huge Court Wins in N.C.

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) The North Carolina Supreme Court on Friday reversed a century of the state’s Democrat vote-fixing machinations and far-left judicial activism in a series of rulings that supporters hailed as major victories for election integrity and political analysts predicted could have national implications.

The high court, in a trio of 5-2 rulings, restored North Carolina’s Voter ID law, removed judicial activism gerrymandering and ended voting for felons who have not completed their sentences.

In its ruling on redistricting, the Republican-majority court reversed its Democrat-majority predecessor’s decision to toss out district maps drawn by the voters’ elected representatives for congressional and legislative races. State courts, which North Carolina Democrats for decades had used partisan lawfare suits to scheme voting districts through judicial edict, were declawed.

The court’s ruling bodes well for the state’s Republican-majority General Assembly’s authority to draw maps reflective of what voters want going into elections next year, and the court’s voter ID ruling could have immediate impact. 

Cook Political Report’s David Wasserman predicted that the court’s ruling “could wipe out four Dem seats, nearly doubling the GOP’s cushion in the House” in 2024.

North Carolina currently has seven Republicans and seven Democrats in the U.S. House, which the GOP controls by a razor-thin majority.

“Our constitution expressly assigns the redistricting authority to the General Assembly subject to explicit limitations in the text,” wrote the high court’s Chief Justice Paul Newby. “It is not within the authority of this Court to amend the constitution to create such limitations on a responsibility that is textually assigned to another branch.”

Newby added that the state’s “constitution does not require or permit a standard known only to four justices. Finally, creating partisan redistricting standards is rife with policy decisions. Policy decisions belong to the legislative branch, not the judiciary.”

“Today is a great day for North Carolina and the rule of law,” said N.C. Republican Party Chairman Michael Whatley. “The people of North Carolina rejected the blatant activism of the progressive judges by electing a strong majority of conservative Justices. These rulings are a big step toward restoring respect for the Constitution and taking politics out of the courtroom.”

The court’s ruling on felon-voting and voter ID, which reversed a Democrat decision to toss the measure based on claims that it was racially discriminatory, were both championed as wins for election integrity.

U.S. Rep. Dan Bishop, R-N.C., a stalwart conservative during his stint in the state’s legislature, commended the court’s decision.

“North Carolinians voted overwhelmingly in 2018 to enact voter ID,” Bishop said. “It’s long past time the people’s voice is finally honored.”

‘Despicable’: CNN, Leftist Outlets Torched over Dubious Articles against SCOTUS

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The concerted effort to tarnish Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is not backing down with the mainstream media now targeting Chief Justice John Robert’s wife, Jane Roberts, and conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch in several dubious articles published by leftists outlets Business Insider, CNN and Politico. 

Insider reported Mrs. Roberts earned millions in commissions from law firms. The second hit came from CNN, which claimed a company with ties to a longtime friend of Thomas argued before the Court. Politico, in a similar fashion, said a law firm chief purchased a Gorsuch-owned home. None of the outlets, however, reported any proof of any wrongdoing. 

“The press was really committed this week to further proving that much of their reporting on the Supreme Court right now involves coordinates hit pieces aimed at delegitimizing the conservative majority,” said commentator A.G. Hamilton in a fiery Substack article. “What is going on here is that far-left activist groups are searching through the financial disclosures of the conservative justices and finding anything they can spin as wrong, even if it clearly isn’t, and then feeding it to sympathetic reporters who are too lazy to do their own research.” 

Mrs. Roberts, who married Chief Justice Roberts in 1996 and is an attorney herself, was reportedly paid $10 million by law firms and corporations in commissions for placing well-accomplished attorneys with them. Business Insider, citing no evidence, tied their findings to a ProPublica report that similarly attempted to smear Justice Thomas by pointing out he is friends with a Republican mega-donor.  

John Cashman, the president of Major, Lindsey & Africa, one of the firms that paid Mrs. Roberts, attributed the payments to the attorney’s “highest standards: Candidate confidentiality, client trust and professionalism.” 

“A high-powered attorney wife punches out of a successful career to avoid an appearance of scandal and becomes successful in her new field,” a RedState writer said, mocking the Business Insider story. 

Taking cues from Insider, CNN claimed a company tied to Harland Crow, a billionaire and friend to Thomas who recently came to the center of attention after a ProPublica hit piece, had a case related to the Court. A.G. Hamilton pointed out that Crow had nothing to do with the case and that the Court itself even declined to hear it. 

The third “hack” piece came from Politico. “The piece is focused on Gorsuch allegedly selling a piece of property when he first got onto the court,” Hamilton continued, adding that the article “tries to imply that, while he disclosed the sale and amount, he intentionally omitted to list the buyer because he was the head of a law firm with extensive business before the court. This is all misdirection that relies on the ignorance of the audience and, likely, the reporter.” 

The conservative commentator concluded, “These partisan and dishonest hit pieces will continue as long as the reporters behind them keep being rewarded for such poor journalism.” 

Sanders Shrugs Off Inflationary Spending for Sake of Green New Deal Agenda

(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., indicated on Thursday he doesn’t care that the exorbitant cost of the Left’s radical Green New Deal could be exponentially higher than what was projected by the Congressional Budget Office.

Sanders was asked by MSNBC’s Chris Hayes if he had any apprehensions about soaring costs associated with uncapped green energy tax credits embedded in the Democrat Inflation Reduction Act, reported Breitbart. The taxing-scheme has come under fire on many fronts, including criticism from Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., who is facing a potentially uphill reelection bid.

“Joe Manchin appears to be incredibly upset about this, and I wonder if you have a view whether it’s good or bad that more clean energy might get built,” Hayes asked the aging socialist about skyrocketing costs.

Sanders wiggled around a direct answer, but left ample room to assure his leftist base that he didn’t have any problems spending mountains of money to advance a green agenda.

“I do not regret the fact that we may be more successful in this country in transforming our energy system than we have previously believed,” Sanders obfuscated, while taking a shot at American energy independence.

“What really bothers me is you still have people out there who are terribly worried about the fossil fuel industry,” Sanders said. “Stop worrying about the fossil fuel industry, worry about your kids and your grandchildren, and the kind of planet that they’re going to be living in.”

The titanic cost increase that Sanders shrugged off as so much loose change, as long is kept the tap flowing to his climate alarmist base, was recently projected by Goldman Sachs at a staggering $1.2 trillion, the Wall Street Journal reported. That would be more than three times original estimates, not that Sanders is counting.

Headline USA’s Mark Pellin contributed to this report

Hannity Feeling Aftershock as Fox Viewers Walk Away Post-Tucker

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) In the wake of Fox News’s firing of former prime time host Tucker Carlson, the rest of the company has taken a massive hit.

Feeling the pain most of all may be Fox host Sean Hannity, whose viewer totals dropped by approximately one million, Revolver News reported.

Fox News totals have dropped substantially since the firing in what is often considered to be one of the most vital demographics: viewers ages 25-54.

Hannity’s show in particular has taken a major hit, ostensibly since it followed Tucker Carlson Tonight, which routinely drew massive audiences.

Hannity, however, has done his share to alienate his own viewers.

Recently, Hannity continued his long, slow decline from a once-vaunted spot atop the network’s primetime roster by rudely attacking Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., over her refusal to support Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., for the House Speaker position.

He has also boosted America’s involvement with and support for Ukraine in recent months and taken a decidedly hostile approach to former President Donald Trump.

Taking over for Carlson is Brian Kilmeade, who is now hosting a show in Carlson’s old time slot called Fox News Tonight.

Kilmeade has generated little interest so far, and that does not appear to be changing any time soon.

Fox drew 1.33 million viewers for substitute host Brian Kilmeade in the 8 p.m. slot on Wednesday night, putting the network second to MSNBC’s Chris Hayes in a competition Carlson used to dominate.

That’s down 56% from the 3.05 million viewers Carlson reached last Wednesday. For all of 2022, Carlson averaged 3.03 million viewers, second only to Fox’s The Five as the most popular program on cable television.

Carlson posted his own alternative monologue on Wednesday, drawing 62.7 million views.

Hannity’s fall coincides with a the larger tanking of Fox News, whose stock plummeted earlier this week following Carlson’s departure.

McConnell Secretly Plotting to Thwart Trump 2024 Plans

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Former President Donald Trump’s plan to clinch the White House and regain control of the U.S. Senate in 2024 could be foiled by political opposition stemming directly from Capitol Hill, this time from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

McConnell, who reversed his support for Trump after the embattled 2020 election, plans to regain power in the Senate through races in West Virginia, Ohio and Montana. McConnell, however, sees the former president as an obstacle to defeating President Joe Biden and gaining a majority primarily because of Trump-picked candidates, Politico reported.

“McConnell spoke very clearly on … his enormous disagreements with the [former] president. And I think the personal attacks at his wife, Elaine Chao, have really rubbed Sen. McConnell the wrong way,” Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., told Politico, adding that McConnell “is just looking forward. He’s not really focused on that disagreement of the past. We all know where he stands.” 

Trump’s plan to win a red wave in 2022 faced opposition from McConnell, with the minority leader refusing to fund the campaigns of Trump-picked candidates for Senate ahead of the midterm elections.  

This move, critics said, split the Republican ticket and effectively handed Democrats the keys to a Senate majority.

The former president could face the same obstacle ahead of 2024. McConnell recruited incumbent Gov. Jim Justice of West Virginia to challenge Sen. Joe Manchin, a Democrat.  

Justice, who announced his official Senate bid on Thursday, is expected to face Rep. Alex Mooney. Justice and Mooney received Trump’s endorsement for their respective re-elections in 2020 and 2022, but many contend the similarities end there. Moody has ripped Justice for his COVID lockdowns and tax hikes. Trump has yet officially announced an endorsement. 

Last year, the former president centered his 2024 announcement around the midterms, where he expected an anti-Biden red wave.  

But once Democrats gained a seat in the Senate, Trump —alongside his former adviser Stephen Miller and Arizona senate candidate Blake Master— accused McConnell of sabotaging the 2022 midterms. 

“It’s Mitch McConnell’s fault. Spending money to defeat great Republican candidates instead of backing Blake Masters and others was a big mistake,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Nov. 13, 2022. 

 McConnell has refused to say whether he would support Trump if he clinched the GOP nominee, claiming he is focusing on the Senate majority instead.