Rep. Luna: FBI Worried that Informant in Biden Crime Family Case Might be Killed

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., said Monday that the FBI is worried that a confidential informant, who provided information about an alleged $5 million bribery scheme involving the Biden family, might be killed if the person’s identity were exposed.

Luna said she learned this from a closed-door House Oversight Committee meeting, which followed an earlier meeting between the FBI and chairman James Comer, R-Ky., and ranking member Jamie Raskin, D-N.Y.

Comer has been seeking a copy of an FBI’s FD-1023 form, which contains the informant’s allegations against the Biden family. At the earlier meeting, FBI Director Christopher Wray reportedly briefed Comer and Raskin about the informant’s allegations but declined to provide the FD-1023 form.

Luna’s statement suggested that the FBI’s concerns for its informant’s safety was one of the reasons the bureau doesn’t want to provide the FD-1023 form.

Either way, Comer announced Monday that his committee will start proceedings on Thursday to hold Wray in contempt of Congress for his refusal to release the document.

Comer said Monday he’s more convinced than ever that the damning allegation made by an FBI whistleblower “has not been disproven and is currently being used in an ongoing investigation.”

He noted that the whistleblower was a “highly credible” informant used by the DOJ since the Obama administration and paid a handsome six-figures for his efforts.

“These are facts, and no amount of spin—and, frankly, lies from the White House or Congressional Democrats—can change this information,” Comer said as part of his announcement to launch contempt proceedings against Wray.

Comer also reportedly revealed Monday that while the FBI’s FD-1023 form containing the allegations was dated in 2020, information in the document suggested the FBI may have been aware of the accusations as far back as 2017.

“This particular document was dated in 2020, but there are notes in the document that date back to 2017,” Comer said during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity.

“We believe that this human source initially informed the FBI of the bribery scheme back in 2017,” he continued. “So my question to the FBI was, ‘What exactly have you done with this accusation?’”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

CDC Warns that Pride Events Could Spawn Massive Monkeypox Outbreak

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) Only weeks after approving revamped guidelines that allow gay men to donate blood without previously-required screening for AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases largely prevalent in the LGBT community, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sounded the alarm for a potential outbreak of monkeypox.

In an ominous assessment issued late last month, the CDC warned that an “uptick in mpox cases in Chicago that began in mid-April underscores the risk of renewed mpox outbreaks, which we judge is substantial across the United States.”

Mpox, the preferred moniker since monkeypox was cancelled as racist by Biden regime leftists, has remained relatively rare in the general population while persisting to cause concern for LGBT communities where transmission rates are highest.

The concern gained added urgency last month with the looming onslaught of so-called Pride Month parades, festivals and protests.

“CDC continues to assess that the risk of resurgent mpox outbreaks is substantial in the United States,” the agency wrote in its May update. “The risk of outbreaks could further increase as people gather this spring and summer for festivals and other events with high potential for skin-to-skin contact or increased sexual activity.”

Adding to the potential crisis, the CDC also acknowledged that it was exploring a theory that the monkeypox virus “may have evolved mutations to evade the two-dose Jynneos vaccines that were rolled out last year to protect against it,” CBS News reported.

The possible mutations were detected “in a cluster of cases” around Los Angeles, which officials said indicated that drug-resistant monkeypox could be transmitted person-to-person in at least “rare cases.”

Those cases could spread rapidly in a tidal wave of LGBT Pride events scheduled across the country, including large cities that are hotspots for LGBT activists.

“Cases of mpox in San Francisco remain low, however, we remain watchful, as several new cases have recently been reported in other parts of the country,” San Francisco Health official Dr. Susan Philip said in statement released by the agency “in advance of the summer season and Pride Celebrations.”

“We want to make sure that everyone can enjoy a happy and healthy Pride,” Philip said.

In response to the monkeypox cluster outbreak in Chicago, the Biden administration is weighing a recommendation for more mpox vaccine boosters. A shift in strategy might be needed, said the regime’s national monkeypox response deputy coordinator, Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, reportedly seen in April spreading the Biden doctrine in Las Vegas at the 2023 Biomedical HIV Prevention Summit.

“We’ve already, really immediately after seeing the Chicago cluster, convened folks within the U.S. government to discuss what the data is that we have and if there needs to be any change,” Daskalakis said last month.

‘Disgusting’: A Fired-up Tim Scott Forces ‘The View’ to Take Commercial Break

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) In a heated exchange on the leftist talk show The View, Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., forcefully rebuked dubious claims of systemic racism. The senator, known for his staunch conservatism and unwavering support for the success of black Americans, passionately defended the nation and slammed host Sunny Hostin for ludicrously suggesting his accomplishments as a black man were merely the “exception.”

A disturbed Scott responded, denouncing the claims of systemic racism offensive. “One of the reasons why I’m on the show is because of the comments that were made frankly on this show that the only way for a young African American kid to be successful in this country is to be the exception and not the rule,” Scott said.

“That’s a dangerous, offensive, disgusting message to send to our young people today that the only way to succeed is by being the exception.”

Scott continued his smackdown of the leftist host by citing the accomplishments of black Americans in U.S. politics, schooling The View audience in the process.

“The fact of the matter is we’ve had an African American president, African American vice president. We’ve had two African Americans to be secretaries of the state,” Scott said. “In my home city, the police chief is an African American who’s now running for mayor. The head of the highway patrol for South Carolina is an African American.”

Furthermore, the South Carolina senator also disproved claims of racism by comparing the unemployment rates of the 1970s to present day.

“In 1975, there was about 15% unemployment in the African American community. For the first time in the country, it’s under 5%,” Scott concluded, delivering the points right before the show was forced to take a commercial break, leaving the hosts struggling to respond.

Following the interview, conservative personalities erupted in support of Scott, who is running for the GOP nomination for 2024 presidency against former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. Conservative commentator Tim Young reacted to the now-viral interview, stating, “Tim Scott owned the racists on The View today with facts. Take note that Joy Behar was given the day off…”

Scott shared the interview with his Twitter followers along with the caption, “Yesterday’s exception is today’s rule. The concept of America is we will become a more perfect union.”

Author Rich Lowry championed Scott for appearing on the leftist show, which has previously accused Scott and other black conservatives of pandering to white supremacists, saying, “This is why you do hostile media—shows strength and confidence and if you knock out of the park, as Tim Scott did, everyone talks about it.”

Watch Scott’s complete smack down of The View below:

U.S. House Oversight Slated Thursday to Start Contempt of Congress Hearing for Wray

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) After FBI Director Christopher Wray on Monday once again failed to adequately cooperate with a House Oversight Committee’s investigation into alleged bribery and corruption schemes involving President Joe Biden, the committee’s chairman announced that it would start proceedings on Thursday to hold the bureau chief in contempt of Congress.

Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., told reporters that his decision was reached after a meeting Monday with Wray, when the FBI chief again refused to hand over a requested document related to alleged Biden family criminal activity.

Wray reportedly provided Comer and oversight committee ranking member Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a briefing on the  document on Monday, but stopped short of producing it for the committee’s review. The bombshell document, a confidential informant FD-1023 file, reportedly relates to Biden receiving upwards of $5 million from a foreign national in a bribery scheme to effect policy outcomes during Biden’s stint as vice president during the Obama administration.

Comer came away from the Monday briefing more convinced than ever that the damning allegations made by a FBI whistleblower, a “highly credible” informant used by the DOJ since the Obama administration and paid a handsome six-figures for his efforts, “has not been disproven and is currently being used in an ongoing investigation,” he said.

“These are facts and no amount of spin, and frankly lies from the White House or Congressional Democrats, can change this information,” Comer said as part of his announcement to launch contempt proceedings against Wray.

Raskin continued the obfuscation, trying to run cover for Biden and emerging from the FBI briefing to claim he didn’t recall any mention of an ongoing investigation. He also implied the contempt call was politically timed to distract from the latest Trump with hunt.

Comer was appropriately dismissive when pressed by reporters on why the actual document needed to be presented to the oversight committee, when FBI officials have said they’re “cooperating in good faith.”

“I’m supposed to take the FBI’s word that they’re investigating this?” Comer shot back and assured that, “The investigation is not dead. This is only the beginning.”

The Daily Beast Ripped for Disturbing ‘Walmart Melania’ Article, Smearing Casey DeSantis

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The Daily Beast found itself at the center of a firestorm of criticism after publishing a deeply disturbing and misogynistic opinion piece that targeted Casey DeSantis, the wife of prominent Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Headlined “Casey DeSantis Is the Walmart Melania,” the article drew comparisons between Mrs. DeSantis, a breast cancer survivor who achieved professional milestones as a news anchor, to former First Lady Melania Trump. Katie Baker, the executive editor of The Beast, criticized Casey’s choice of jacket worn during a campaign event on Saturday and claimed, “[W]hile Casey may be trying to position herself after Jackie Kennedy (good luck) and even Melania, if this weekend is any indication, she’s falling far short.”

Baker further stated, “It doesn’t matter how many times she wears that ice-blue Badgley Mischka cape dress. The DeSantises will never be Camelot.” The article also insinuated that Casey was attempting to replicate Mrs. Trump’s infamous ‘I really don’t care. Do U’ jacket.

The piece faced widespread condemnation for its misogynistic nature and triggered outrage among DeSantis’s supporters and several conservative personalities on Twitter.

One of the critics, conservative attorney Heath Mayor, described the article as “disgusting” and denounced it as an example of “the ugly underbelly of politics.” Mayo’s sentiments found support from Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, who preemptively endorsed DeSantis for the 2024 presidential election. “Dear crazy folks – please keep writing attack stories about my fellow cancer-survivor and great American, @CaseyDeSantis,” Roy said on Monday.

Tomi Lahren, a Fox News conservative host and commentator, dismissed the opinion article as “ridiculous” and criticized anti-DeSantis Republicans who spew the nickname against Mrs. DeSantis on Twitter.

Giancarlo Sopo, founder of Visto Media and a political analyst, echoed Lahren’s sentiments and responded, “I know the mainstream media mean this as some sort of insult, but: 1) Wal-Mart is a great store where millions of Americans shop.  2) Casey is great. 3) She will make a great First Lady.”

Another Twitter user championed the Florida governor for his consistent criticism of the media. “You understand why Desantis treats the media the way he does?” the user said. “This isn’t some chess game or ratings game to him. He means it. He’s not doing townhalls with those who slander and insult him and his wife.” 

Trump Says He Expects His Imminent Indictment, Arrest by Biden DOJ

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Donald Trump said on his social media platform Truth Social that he would soon be charged by a corrupt Department of Justice  that has been politically weaponized under the Biden regime.

A video released on Monday showed Trump’s attorney arriving for a meeting at the Biden DOJ. While his attorneys were at the meeting, Trump wrote from his Truth Social account in all capital letters about how the corrupt legal system was after him, even though he didn’t do anything wrong, while allowing Democrats who committed many crimes to remain free.

“HOW CAN DOJ POSSIBLY CHARGE ME, WHO DID NOTHING WRONG, WHEN NO OTHER PRESIDENTS WERE CHARGED, WHEN JOE BIDEN WON’T BE CHARGED FOR ANYTHING, INCLUDING THE FACT THAT HE HAS 1,850 BOXES, MUCH OF IT CLASSIFIED, AND SOME DATING BACK TO HIS SENATE DAY WHEN EVEN DEMOCRAT SENATORS ARE SHOCKED,” he wrote.

Trump’s previous soothsaying came to pass when he predicted his looming indictment by Soros-funded Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, based on alleged hush-money payments made to porn star Stormy Daniels. The ensuing indictment has been roundly condemned as a disgracefully weak case that was politically motivated.

The latest witch hunt that has Trump facing his predicted arrest centers around claims that he wrongly stashed documents from his presidential tenure, ending in the militarized FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago. Trump has denied any wrongdoing and blasted Biden’s DOJ while forecasting his likely arrest.

“If Joe Biden’s Department of Justice chooses to charge his 2024 rival, who in recent polling is currently beating Biden, the Democrats would be choosing to deploy a strategy straight out of a third-world African country,” wrote National File’s Charles Downs, of efforts to avert a potential Trump/Biden tilt.

On Sunday night, Trump published another Truth Social post, in which he said he would soon be indicted and arrested by the Biden DOJ and FBI.

”Reports are the Marxist Special Prosecutor, DOJ, & FBI, want to Indict me on the BOXES HOAX, despite all of the wrongdoing that they have done for SEVEN YEARS, including SPYING ON MY CAMPAIGN,” he wrote.

Headline USA’s Mark Pellin contributed to the report

States that Went Overboard w/ COVID Now Struggling to Pass Any Vaccine Laws

(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) California and Wisconsin were two of the only states to try and pass new COVID mandates in 2023, and they failed to pass because of push-back from citizens weary of vaccines and vaccine mandates echoing COVID tyranny.

Before COVID, California passed some of the strictest vaccine mandates in the country, according to Politico.

Calif. Assemblyman Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, D-Winters, had been peddling a HPV vaccine mandate for 8th graders and a booster for high school students since the COVID years. The Democrat leadership of the California legislature urged her to shelf the mandate until after COVID.

This year, before she had formally introduced her mandate, parental choice and medical freedom groups had already been meeting with legislators to ensure that the COVID mandates were not returning.

When Aguiar-Curry introduced her bill, it immediately became apparent that it was going to face fierce resistance. Medical freedom advocates called legislators, posted on twitter and Facebook and contacted the members of the specific committee.

Failing to produce any momentum or enthusiasm for her bill, Aguiar-Curry initially eliminated the requirement for middle-school and high-school students, but kept it for college students.

“I thought I did them a big favor. I got the schools off the bill because they were upset about it,” she said, explaining that she missed the point that any vaccine mandate for education infringes upon freedom.

She later amended her bill, removing requirements and substituting them with a recommendation.

The medical freedom groups were not acting alone, but rather, had help from a powerful new ally, according to Joshua Coleman, the founder of the group “V for Vaccine.”

“[The] most powerful thing to get the author to withdraw the mandate was school districts opposing the bill,” he said.

Though small and rural districts were the only ones to openly oppose the bill, larger and more prestigious schools and education groups began quietly pushing Aguiar-Curry to lighten or drop her proposal.

Troy Flint, a spokesperson for the California School Boards Association, addressed the failure of the mandate.

“It’s fair to say we’re experiencing a new paradigm in the vaccine debates,” he said. “I think there is weariness about addressing the issue because of the impact that the closure of in-person instruction had on students, as well as just the vitriol that surrounds the issue and has the potential to distract.”

Apart from California, “Wisconsin is one of the only other states that tried any kind of vaccine mandate this year,” per Politico.

Wisconsin tried to establish the mandate with its health department. The departments attempt to require seventh-graders to be vaccinated against meningitis and 12th-graders be boosted for it — became a supercharged political issue, and Republican lawmakers blocked it, according to Ryan Westergaard, chief medical officer for Wisconsin Department of Health Services.

“The pushback was unexpected, and the tenor was much more intense and personal than we anticipated,” he said. “There’s a real reluctance to introduce any proactive policy to improve vaccines because once it gets discussed in the public sphere there’s a real danger that we will lose ground.”

Money in Digital Payment Apps such as Venmo, PayPal, May Not Be Insured, Watchdog Warns

(By Brett Rowland, The Center Square) A federal agency is warning consumers that digital payment apps such as PayPal, Venmo, and Cash App lack federal insurance protections.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau warned that money stored in such apps is often not covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insures deposits up to $250,000 per depositor at member firms.

“Popular digital payment apps are increasingly used as substitutes for a traditional bank or credit union account but lack the same protections to ensure that funds are safe,” CFPB Director Rohit Chopra said in a statement. “As tech companies expand into banking and payments, the CFPB is sharpening its focus on those that sidestep the safeguards that local banks and credit unions have long adhered to.”

The warning comes after bank runs and failures at Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank.

The Financial Technology Association, a Washington-D.C.-based trade group that represents the industry, said the products are safe and transparent.

“Tens of millions of American consumers and small businesses rely on payment apps to better spend, manage, and send their money,” the group said in a statement. “These accounts are safe and transparent, with users receiving FDIC Insurance on their accounts depending on the products they use.”

Not all accounts have FDIC protections.

“Unlike traditional bank and credit union accounts which have deposit insurance, funds stored in these nonbank payment companies may be unprotected,” the bureau warned.

“When users receive payments, through these apps, these funds are not automatically swept into their linked bank or credit union account,” the bureau said. “In addition, payment app companies do not necessarily store customer funds in an insured account through a business arrangement with a bank or credit union. The company’s investments carry risk and if it were to fail, customers could lose their funds.”

Feds Spent over $1.3B in Russia, China on Dubious Projects

0

(By Casey Harper, The Center Square) The U.S. sent more than $1.3 billion to China and Russia since 2017, according to a new analysis that details a string of problematic spending projects funded by taxpayers.

The watchdog group, Open the Books, and U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, released the analysis, which detailed an array of examples they deemed troubling “including $770,466 to a state-run lab in Russia to put cats on treadmills” and another project for nearly $100,000 for gender equality cartoons.

“It is gravely concerning that no one in Washington can actually account for millions sent to Russia and China for pointless projects,” Ernst said. “But I have the receipts.”

Ernst and Open The Books found at least $490 million in taxpayer dollars paid to groups in China and another $870 million paid to organizations in Russia since 2017 via U.S. grants and contracts.

Ernst introduced legislation last week to require all taxpayer dollars sent to Russia and China be tracked and publicly disclosed. A House version of the Tracking Receipts to Adversarial Countries for Knowledge of Spending (TRACKS) Act was introduced by U.S. Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wisc.

Gallagher said “we know the federal government has wasted more than one billion in U.S. taxpayer dollars on our adversaries.”

“This is crazy, but to make matters worse, this may only be the tip of the iceberg,” he added.

Adam Andrzejewski, CEO & founder of OpenTheBooks.com, has echoed the call for more transparency of government spending. Often, it can take years to find out where federal funds went and how they were used.

“Holding firms responsible to publicly report where and how they use their grants and contract awards can deputize private citizens and make them part of the solution,” he said.

Here are a list of examples of federal spending projects found by the analysis:

  • $58.7 million from Department of State, including $96,875 for gender equality through exhibition of New Yorker magazine cartoons
  • $51.6 million from Department of Defense, including $6 million for tech support of the military “deployment and distribution command” software – delivering equipment and supplies anywhere our military is deployed, even though the DOD Inspector General warned the Pentagon about using Chinese IT companies on DOD projects
  • $4.7 million to a Russian company for health insurance that was sanctioned by the U.S. in 2022
  • $4.2 million from Health and Human Services, including $770,466 to a state-run lab in Russia to put cats on treadmills
  • $2.4 million on Russian alcohol and addiction research
  • $2 million funneled to China’s state-run Wuhan Institute of Virology to conduct dangerous experiments on bat coronaviruses and transgenic mice
  • $1.6 million to Chinese companies from National School Lunch Program, which means taxpayer dollars from the CARES Act meant for American farmers went to Chinese ag exporters
  • $1.45 million for pandemic virus tracking in Russia
  • Subsidies for the Russian space program by funding the Russia Space Agency and vendors

Rep. George Santos Ready to Be Jailed to Keep IDs of Bond Cosigners Secret

(Headline USA) Rep. George Santos’ lawyer said Monday the indicted New York Republican would risk going to jail to protect the identities of the people who cosigned the $500,000 bond enabling his pretrial release.

The lawyer, Joseph Murray, urged a judge to deny a request by news outlets to unseal the names of Santos’s bond suretors, or guarantors, suggesting they could “suffer great distress,” including possible job losses and physical harm, if they’re identified publicly.

“My client would rather surrender to pretrial detainment than subject these suretors to what will inevitably come,” Murray wrote in a letter to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anne Shields.

Murray asked that she give them time to withdraw as cosigners if she decides to unseal their names, which Shields kept off the public court docket at the lawyer’s request.

Murray said he, Santos and Santos’s staff have been receiving threatening and harassing calls and messages, including death threats. The lawyer said he received a call Friday from someone shouting, “Who paid Santos’ bond?” and said he worries Santos’ critics “are just waiting to pounce” on the people backing his release.

“We truly fear for their health, safety and well being,” Murray wrote.

Santos pleaded not guilty on May 10 to a 13-count indictment charging that he duped donors, stole from his campaign, lied to Congress about being a millionaire and cheated to collect unemployment benefits he didn’t deserve. He is due back in court on June 30.

The 34-year-old, who represents parts of Queens and Long Island, has defied calls to resign and has said he won’t drop his bid for a second term.

Prosecutors have not taken a position on the unsealing request.

In a letter last week, a lawyer for news outlets urged the judge to the release the names of Santos’ bond suretors, citing a “compelling public interest in maintaining the greatest transparency possible in these proceedings.”

The New York Times first wrote to Shields on May 23 asking to unseal the names. Other news outlets, including the Associated Press, joined the fight a few days later.

Separately, the House Ethics Committee wrote to Santos on May 16 asking him to identify the people who cosigned his bond.

Murray said Santos originally lined up three financially responsible cosigners as suretors, but one backed out and the other two didn’t show up to his arraignment.

That forced them to make “other confidential arrangements” to ensure Santos’ release, Murray said.

Santos’ bond is unsecured. That means his cosigners didn’t have put up any money up front, but could be forced to pay the full amount if he doesn’t comply with his release conditions or fails to show up for court.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press