Biden Instructs Staff to Deny Existence of 4-Yr.-Old Granddaughter Navy

Jacob Bruns
-
0
Biden Instructs Staff to Deny Existence of 4-Yr.-Old Granddaughter Navy

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Reports coming from the White House indicate that President Joe Biden’s aides have been instructed as to the number of grandchildren to attribute to the President and his wife, Jill Biden.

In the reported number, six, the staff will omit Hunter Biden’s illegitimate daughter, Navy, who is four-years-old, Fox News reported.

Last week Hunter finally settled an ongoing child care dispute with Navy’s mother. Yet both Joe and Jill have refused to recognize Navy as one of their grandchildren.

The president himself had even listed six grandchildren during April’s “take your child to work day” at the White House.

He ignored her once again when the LSU Tigers Women’s Basketball Team visited the White House after winning the NCAA national championship.

“I’ve got four granddaughters,” Biden stammered. “We had some pretty athletes. I was a good athlete. My brothers weren’t but all the real athletes in my family are women so, anyway.”

According to the New York Times, the look is so bad for President Biden and his wife that it could even cost them votes in the upcoming 2024 election.

“The strength of his political persona, which emphasizes decency, family and duty, was enough to defeat Mr. Trump the first time around, and he would need to keep it intact if Mr. Trump is the Republican nominee in 2024,” the NYT‘s op-ed said.

Numerous conservatives on Twitter blasted the president and his degenerate son for their refusal to acknowledge their connection to Navy.

One Twitter user called it an “absolute disgrace.”

Another called the president and his son “monsters.”

The four-year-old girl allegedly speaks about both Joe and Hunter often, and recognizes that both her father and her grandfather are very famous. Nonetheless, she has never met either of them, and it does not appear that she will ever be acknowledged by them.

Ex-ESPN Race-Baiter Accuses Asian-Americans of Aiding White Supremacy

Jacob Bruns
-
0
Ex-ESPN Race-Baiter Accuses Asian-Americans of Aiding White Supremacy

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Former ESPN host Jemele Hill has once more stepped into the race-baiting arena, this time accusing Asian-Americans of effectively acting as agents of white supremacy, OutKick reported.

Hill, incensed by the recent Supreme Court decision overturning affirmative action in universities, said that Asian-American student Yiatin Chu “carried the water for white supremacy” by challenging the affirmative action regime.

After the win in court, Chu tweeted: “I told my daughter that today is a big day. They’ve ended affirmative action. ‘Isn’t it what you’re been fighting for?’ she asked. I said yes.”

Unable to control her outrage, Hill wrote a visceral response, suggesting that Chu’s legal victory was for white supremacists everywhere.

“Can’t wait until she reads that you gladly carried the water for white supremacy and stabbed the folks in the back whose people fought diligently for Asian American rights in America.”

According to the courts, however, the elimination of affirmative action eliminates racism in the acceptance process.

“Eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it,” Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion.

For Roberts and the majority of the high court, “the student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual—not on the basis of race.”

Jemele Hill, however, is no stranger to left-wing political activism. She spent years at ESPN propagating BLM support and politicizing the sports network before being fired in 2018.

Earlier this year, Hill used the same exact language of “carrying water” to describe the systemic racism that pervades all American institutions, including law enforcement.

“The entire system of policing is based on white supremacist violence,” she said. “We see people under the boot of oppression carry its water all the time.”

RFK Jr. Blasts Biden’s ‘Midnight Announcement’ about His Uncle’s Assassination

Corine Gatti
-
0
RFK Jr. Blasts Biden’s ‘Midnight Announcement’ about His Uncle’s Assassination

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) Democrat presidential challenger Robert F. Kennedy Jr. blasted the White House in a blistering Twitter rant on Sunday about the reticent way President Joe Biden and his administration announced that they would be retaining certain President John F. Kennedy assassination-related records from 60 years ago.

The son of former Attorney General Robert Kennedy didn’t conceal his feelings about the “midnight announcement” on Friday, concerning his uncle, JFK, the Gateway Pundit reported.

“It’s not about conspiracy – it is about transparency,” Kennedy tweeted. “In a midnight Friday night announcement, the White House has delivered the bad news that President Biden will be maintaining secrecy indefinitely on some JFK assassination-related records.”

Kennedy referenced a White House memorandum advising departments and agencies to postpone the release of certain records for national security reasons. Biden has certified that continued postponement is necessary to protect against identifiable harms that outweigh the public interest in disclosure.

“The assassination was 60 years ago,” he wrote in one Twitter post. “What national security secrets could possibly be at risk? What are they hiding?”

The aftermath of Kennedy’s assassination resulted in numerous inquiries and conspiracy theories, with historians carefully analyzing every document for potential new insights into the event and 1960s intelligence operations. Government secrecy over the years further complicated the investigation.

According to the National Archives and Records Administration, the collection included more than 5 million pages of assassination-related items, including records, photos, movies, recordings and artifacts. The majority of the materials are accessible for research purposes.

“The White House announcement is unlawful,” Kennedy said. “In 1992 the JFK Records Act was passed unanimously by Congress with the promise that all assassination-related records would be released no later than October 2017. This promise has been broken once again with this midnight announcement.”

The incumbent administration’s nuisance ended his Twitter tirade with a few parting words for Biden about the upcoming election.

“Public trust in government is at an all-time low,” RFK added. “Releasing these records would be a small but significant step toward regaining that trust,” Kennedy tweeted before ending with “#Kennedy24.”

According to a YouGov poll, 44% of Democrats support Kennedy’s candidacy, while 37% oppose it and 19% are unsure. Kennedy is also competing against author Marianne Williamson for the Democratic presidential nomination to unseat Biden.

Are American Weapons Being Used in the Paris Riots?

Ken Silva
-
0
Are American Weapons Being Used in the Paris Riots?

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Fully automatic weapons have been spotted amidst the rioting in Paris, France, raising questions about whether U.S. firearms have been illegally diverted to the city—which would be a repeat of what happened about eight years ago in the 2015 Paris terrorist attacks.

French news site Mediavenir published a video Friday of reported AK-47—which are manufactured both in the U.S. and Russia—fire in the La Duchère district of Lyons.

Russia Today published another article the next day, linking to several Telegram videos of other apparent automatic firearms—including what appears to be a light machine gun. As Russia Today noted, the weapon appeared to have a bipod attached as well as a large-capacity drum magazine.

The reports are causing a stir on Twitter, but the social media company’s “Community Notes” feature is criticizing them as uncorroborated conspiracy theories.

“There is no evidence to back up this claim. One of the websites reporting this is a Russian news source,” Community Notes said. “Another website reporting this story publishes conspiracy theories, and propaganda.”

However, Paris has been ravaged by illegal American weapons in the past, including in the ISIS attacks on the city in 2015—an incident linked to the Obama administration’s Operation Fast and Furious scandal.

Operation Fast and Furious entailed the ATF purposely allowing firearms dealers to sell marked weapons illegally with the goal of tracking them to Mexican drug cartels. The operation turned into a major scandal in 2010, when one of the firearms was used to murder Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.

While Fast and Furious was out of the media spotlight by the Paris shooting, Judicial Watch revealed in 2016 that one of the remaining guns was used in that attack.

“A Report of Investigation (ROI) filed by a case agent in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF) tracked the gun used in the Paris attacks to a Phoenix gun owner who sold it illegally, ‘off book,’” Judicial Watch said at the time, citing sources within law enforcement.

“Federal agents tracing the firearm also found the Phoenix gun owner to be in possession of an unregistered fully automatic weapon.”

Some eight years after the Paris attack and more than a decade after Fast and Furious emerged as a national scandal, guns from that operation are still being used by criminals.

Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., revealed in April that a Fast and Furious gun was recently used in a crime. Biggs didn’t provide details of this crime, but said the ATF is now questioning the firearms dealer from which the gun emanated.

The U.S. government reportedly lost 2,000 firearms during Operation Fast and Furious, of which only 710 were recovered as of February 2012. Biggs asked ATF Director Dettelbach how many more have been recovered since then, and the ATF boss said he didn’t know.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

SCOTUS Affirmative Action Ruling Puts Corporate DEI Programs under Scrutiny

Robert Jonathan
-
0
SCOTUS Affirmative Action Ruling Puts Corporate DEI Programs under Scrutiny

(Robert Jonathan, Headline USA) A U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission official is suggesting that the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling provides a perhaps different kind of wake-up call for woke corporations that are pushing divisive diversity, equity and inclusion policies that could be illegal.

During a Fox News interview, Trump-appointed Commissioner Andrea Lucas opined that the high-court decision striking down racial preferences on campus brings “into alignment education law with employment law.”

Last week, in the companion Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. UNC. cases, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that race-based student admissions criteria at colleges and universities were unconstitutional under the Equal Protections Clause of the 14th Amendment.

The Biden administration immediately condemned the outcome, and it appears that universities from Harvard on down might be planning to exploit perceived loopholes to continue the existing cosmetic diversity protocol.

“Universities may try to pivot into decisions that are not as overtly based on race,” Lucas noted. “They’ll try to hid behind other factors,” but in so doing, that eliminates “everything that actually makes people diverse and unique.”

Along those lines, ex-Trump administration senior advisor Stephen Miller, the president of American First Legal, put law schools, in particular, on notice that the organization will hold them accountable for any attempts to circumvent the ruling.

Insofar as the 6-3 decision’s potential impact on business, Lucas said that  “I think this is gonna be a wake-up call for employers,” and recommended that lawyers should “take a really hard look at the lawfulness of their corporate diversity programs.”

She added that “Even though many employers don’t use the word affirmative action, it’s rampant today, from ESG, to focuses on equity. Pretty much everywhere, there’s a ton of pressure at the corporate 100 across corporate America to take race-conscious decision-making, race-conscious actions, in employment law, and that’s been illegal, and it’s still illegal.”

ESG stands for environmental, social, and corporate governance, a form of globalist woke capitalism involving typically unprofitable, far-left initiatives that major investors have forced on corporations.

Commissioner Lucas implied that the Supreme Court precedent could prompt more litigation even in the employment arena from adversely affected employees.

“I have noticed an increasing number of challenges to corporate DEI programs, and I would expect that this decision is going to shine even more of a spotlight about how out of alignment some of those programs are.”

Lucas mentioned that she’s not leveling criticism at diversity programs across the board, but some of them could lead to lawsuits.

“But to the extent that they’re explicitly or implicitly taking race into decision-making for employment decisions, race-restricted internships, race-restricted mentoring, race-focused promotion decisions, etc. —

“If you’re using race as any factor in your decision-making, you’re already violating the law, and I expect that you are going to have a rising amount of challenges as this sort of raises that issue back to people’s attention.”

In a Reuters Op-Ed, Lucas similarly cautioned that “Poorly structured voluntary diversity programs pose both legal and practical risks for companies. Those risks existed before the Supreme Court’s decision today. Now they may be even higher.”

Through life experience, many employees have learned that hiring, promotion and termination decisions can sometimes be arbitrary or unfair; including race into the calculation just makes that kind of scenario significantly more unreasonable if not discriminatory.

MSNBC’s Joy Reid Admits She Only Got Into Harvard Because of Affirmative Action

Contributing Author
-
0
MSNBC’s Joy Reid Admits She Only Got Into Harvard Because of Affirmative Action

(Headline USA) MSNBC’s resident race-baiter, Joy Reid, admitted on Thursday that the only reason she was accepted into Harvard University was because of affirmative action.

In a segment on colleague Chris Hayes’s show, Reid was asked to react to the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling that day, which struck down the use of race as a factor in college admissions based on a pair of decisions, including one against her alma mater. 

“I got into Harvard only because of affirmative action,” said Reid, who has regularly displayed her lack of intellectual heft on camera by reducing complex issues into the most banal and simplistic of black-versus-white dynamics.

“I went to a school no one had ever heard of in Denver, Colorado, in a small suburb. I didn’t go to Exeter or Andover. I didn’t have college test prep,” Reid said.

“I just happened to be really nerdy and smart and have really good grades and good SAT scores,” she claimed.

A Harvard recruiter came to Denver “and did a pre-interview to pull me into Harvard,” Reid continued. “I was pulled in—affirmatively.”

Nonetheless, Reid complained that her presence at Harvard was “questioned by white people,” as if her class contributions were lowering the intellectual discourse. 

“I was in a big conference class where some white students stood up and said, ‘Those students, the black students, they’re only here because of affirmative action,’” she claimed. “It became a huge argument that we all ended up having.” 

This was the first time she had her “academic credentials questioned,” the MSNBC host claimed, suggesting that the transition from a no-name high school of limited academic rigor to one of the nation’s premier higher-learning institutions should have been seamless.

“It was one of the many reasons I was miserable there my freshman year—you felt completely out of place,” she said.

“People kept telling me, ‘You shouldn’t be here,’” she continued. “And yet, some of the people I went to school with were far less smart than me or the other black folks there.”

Reid did not address how affirmative action policies affect other minorities, including Asian–Americans, who are disproportionately impacted by the use of race in admissions.

Boston Univ. Offers Therapy to Students Traumatized by SCOTUS Rulings

Molly Bruns
-
0
Boston Univ. Offers Therapy to Students Traumatized by SCOTUS Rulings

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Boston University’s law school offered its students therapy sessions to help them cope with the recent decisions issued by the Supreme Court.

The BU Law Student Government also denounced the court’s decisions to outlaw affirmative action, require college students to pay off their loans and affirming that a graphic designer did not have to create invitations for a same-sex wedding.

The student board claimed the judges “went so far as to say that the race-based admission system uses race as a negative and operates it as a stereotype,” according to the Daily Mail.

They also decried the judges for pushing a “colorblind” admissions process, allowing qualified students to earn spots in universities regardless of their race.

“However, as many of our students know and Justice Sotomayor says in her dissent, ‘ignoring race will not equalize a society that is racially unequal,” the letter added. “These three decisions form part of a lengthy sequence of this court’s ruling which steadily erode the rights of marginalized communities and undermine the very diversity upon which our nation was built.”

The BU Student Government provides counseling services to the entire student body, an amenity that costs colleges hundreds of thousands of dollars and further fuels the student debt crisis.

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in a vote against affirmative action, deciding that the policy was unconstitutional.

Mainstream media commentators expressed outraged with the decision, including Joy Reid, who unsurprisingly shared that she got into Harvard due to affirmative action.

The votes for for student loan payments and freedom of religion fell along similar partisan lines.

Several prominent voices in the legal field voiced their concern about the direction of the nation’s law schools.

In October, Judge James Ho of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit announced that he would no longer consider students from Yale Law School as clerks for his office after an attempt from the student activists to shut down a bipartisan event on the school’s campus.

Ho called Yale’s campus a “closed and intolerant environment.”

Illinois Gov. to Give Drivers Licenses to over 300K Illegal Aliens

Molly Bruns
-
0
Illinois Gov. to Give Drivers Licenses to over 300K Illegal Aliens

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) A new law signed by Illinois Democrat Gov. J.B. Pritzker allowed nearly 300,000 illegal immigrants to become eligible for standard drivers licenses in the Midwestern state.

The governor signed HB 3882 into law last week, permitting illegal aliens to get driver licenses that are compliant with the REAL ID Act, according to Breitbart,

The state of Illinois had a program that allowed illegals to get temporary licenses that differed from those given to legal citizens and immigrants, called the Temporary Visitor Driver’s License Program.

An estimated 300,000 illegal migrants were able to acquire licenses. Under the newly signed law, all of them can switch to the standardized licenses usually reserved for citizens.

“This legislation is a significant step in eliminating the barriers to opportunity that many undocumented immigrants face,” Pritzker said in a statement. “We’re ensuring every eligible individual can obtain a driver’s license, making our roads safer, decreasing stigma, and creating more equitable systems for all.”

The law will take effect at the start of 2024.

Illinois currently has an illegal immigrant population of 680,000—and counting, as the sanctuary city of Chicago continues to unwillingly take in migrants from cities along the border.

One reason Democrats fight for driver’s licenses for illegal aliens is because Immigration and Customs Enforcement easily detain them when they are pulled over without a license.

Illegal immigrants had more than 17,500 drunk driving convictions in 2022.

Some speculated that the newly-gifted IDs will also make it easier for immigrants to vote for Democratic candidat, despite their lack of citizenship.

ICE encountered an estimated 1.2 million people crossing the southern border, with gotaways averaging 60,000 per month per government estimates.

Despite the astonishing figures, the Biden administration continues to insist the border is secure.

Several governors—particularly states those along the southern border—vehemently disagree.

“While the federal government has abdicated its duties, Republican governors stand ready to protect the U.S.-Mexico border and keep families safe,” a group of 24 governors said in support of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.

Jen Psaki Claims Muslims Are Being Tricked By GOP to Oppose Wokeism

Contributing Author
-
0
Jen Psaki Claims Muslims Are Being Tricked By GOP to Oppose Wokeism

(Headline USA) Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki claimed Sunday that Muslim Americans were being “recruited” by the GOP to oppose woke ideology.

Referencing recent protests by Muslim families who are concerned about woke content in their public schools—specifically that related to LGBT and transgender issues—Psaki suggested on her new MSNBC show, Inside with Jen Psaki, that Muslims were being tricked into opposing other minority groups.

“I’ve been noticing the reemergence of a very old GOP playbook,” Psaki said, suggesting former President Richard Nixon encouraged the fear of black people in order to draw the votes of white people. 

“And it worked by pitting one group of Americans against another, the GOP successfully managed to split off southern whites from the Democratic Party,” she added.

The Republican Party is now “trying to recruit Muslim Americans, a community that makes up less than 2% of the U.S. population, against another tiny, marginalized group of Americans: transgender people,” Psaki continued.

“Ten years ago, standing against Sharia law was the key GOP litmus test,” Psaki claimed. “Now that litmus test seems to be held fervently to oppose transgender people.”

Psaki called this “same old GOP playbook” a “cynical ploy to tear at the fabric of our society and damage the idea that out of many, we are one—all because they want so desperately to regain the White House.”

Ismail Royer, the director of the Islam and Religious Freedom Action Team for the Religious Freedom Institute, blasted Psaki’s remarks as insulting to the many Muslim families who oppose the ideology she represents.

“The left wants to scare Muslims into accepting its indoctrination of our children in exchange for a smile and pat on the head,” Royer said in a statement. “They insult Muslims by portraying us as having no agency or intelligence but can’t imagine that we’ve weighed the bargain they offer us and rejected it.” 

STUDY: Texas Heartbeat Act Saved 10K Babies in 2022

Ezekiel Loseke
-
0
STUDY: Texas Heartbeat Act Saved 10K Babies in 2022

(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) Researchers from Johns Hopkins University’s Bloomberg School of Public Health published a paper that estimated the pro-life heartbeat law passed by Texas in May 2021 saved 10,000 babies in 2022.

“The study’s findings highlight how abortion bans have real implications for birthing people,” said Suzanne Bell, assistant professor at the Bloomberg School’s Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, while using a politically correct term for “mothers” to virtue-signal her leftist values.

The study used statistical models and historical data to come to its conclusions, according to The Hill.

During the period in question, there were 297,088 births. However, according to the study, which used data from all 50 states and Washington D.C., there would have only been 287,289 births without the de-facto abortion ban.

The law prohibits abortions after a heartbeat is detected and allows private citizens to sue anyone who violates the law or abets illegal procedures.

Alison Gemmill, assistant professor at the Bloomberg School’s Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, and one of the study’s lead authors, explained that the heartbeat bill seemed to be working as designed.

“Although our study doesn’t detail why these extra births occurred, our findings strongly suggest that a considerable number of pregnant individuals in Texas were unable to overcome barriers to abortion access,” she said, using the extraneous word “access” to make the barbaric practice sound more clinical.

A previous study suggested that Texas women wanting an abortion may simply travel to a neighboring state to kill their baby. However, all but one of Texas’s neighbors have outlawed abortion since the Dobbs decision, according to the Daily Wire.

“If, previously, people were able to leave the state to go to a neighboring state to seek an abortion, that’s no longer an option,” Gemmill said. “So it’s possible that we could be seeing even greater increases [in children born] post-Dobbs.”

John Seago, president of Texas Right to Life, expressed gratitude over the news.

“Every baby saved from elective abortion should be celebrated,” he said, according to the Texas Tribune. “This new study highlights the significant success of our movement in the last two years, while we look forward to helping the mothers and families of our state care for their children.”

Texas has allocated an extra $20 million to its alternatives to abortion program. The program “promotes childbirth and provides support services to pregnant women and their families, adoptive parents, and parents who have experienced miscarriage or the loss of a child,” according to the program’s website.

Covered services include:

  • Counseling, educational information, and classes on pregnancy, parenting and adoption
  • Funding for car seats, clothing, diapers and formula
  • Care coordination through referrals to government assistance programs and other social services programs
  • Call center for information and appointment scheduling
  • Housing and support services through maternity homes.
1...1,8871,8881,889...3,888Page 1,888 of 3,888