Black Prof. Who Wrote Fla.’s Anti-Woke Curriculum Debunks Kamala’s Lies

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) William B. Allen, a Michigan State University political philosophy professor who helped write Florida state’s new curriculum on African–American history, eviscerated Vice President Kamala Harris in a mere 15 minutes on conservative pundit Megyn Kelly’s podcast.

Allen took jabs at Harris, insinuating that her uncharacteristically articulate remarks were fed to her as she often cackles when she’s off-script.

Nevertheless, while they may not have been the typical word salad that constituents have come to expect, her statements remained untrue.

In particular, Allen—who not only is black but an admired civil-rights leader and African American scholar in is own right—disputed her claim that the curriculum painted slavery as “beneficial.”

In what amounted to a brazen display of leftist projection, Harris also accused “extremists” of “gaslighting” America and claimed conservatives were dividing the country by insisting that schools continue to teach history without injecting woke, Marxist critical theory into it.

However, Harris was the one dividing Americans by making baseless and false allegations, the former chairman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights said.

Allen mocked the notion that he and the other black commission members involved in the curriculum were justifying slavery, Red State reported.

But the motivation behind the criticism had everything to do with political agendas originating from the White House—and running through partisan teachers unions.

“I came to understand, this had nothing to do with the standards,” Allen charged. “It had everything to do with a larger agenda, starting with the teachers’ union and its allies and, of course, carrying it to the level of the vice presidency in order to give it heft…and to account for slavery as the soul of America and discount the accomplishments of America.”

The Florida teachers union chose not to contribute to the standards and instead remained in the background, the news outlet noted, causing Allen to liken their behavior to that of a “snake hiding in the weeds.”

The Florida Board of Education approved the new social studies curriculum which included an African–American History section. However, there was significant backlash from opponents.

The standard was criticized by American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, a white woman, who marked the work as “grievously racist” and “disgusting.”

CNN’s Ashly Allison suggested Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis wanted to “ban Rosa Parks.”

Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calf., also chimed in saying DeSantis was “pro-slavery.”

Allen clarified that said Rosa Parks was specifically mentioned in the standards, along with many other historical black leaders. He ended the podcast by talking about his great-grandfather, someone who came from the islands and who was enslaved in the U.S.

“From his resourcefulness, we derive benefits. I think anyone who would try to change that language would be denying that great-grandfather Cidipus made any contribution,” he said.

“I certainly could not endorse doing that,” he continued. “Booker T. Washington’s autobiography is titled Up From Slavery, that was his story, not our story…and these stories are legends.”

Allen and other members who worked on the curriculum issued a statement refuting Harris’s claims.

They said Florida students deserved to learn how slaves took advantage of circumstances they were in to “benefit themselves and the community of African descendants.”

“It is disappointing, but nevertheless unsurprising, that critics would reduce months of work to create Florida’s first ever stand-alone strand of African American History Standards to a few isolated expressions without context,” they wrote. “We encourage everyone to view these robust standards for themselves.”

NYC to House Illegals at Psychiatric Center – in the Parking Lot

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) After boasting for years of its sanctuary status for illegal immigrants, New York City has found itself so overwhelmed it’s being forced to house 1,000 asylum-seekers in the parking lot of a psychiatric center.

The new emergency relief facility at the Creedmoor Psychiatric Center in Queens will house adult males and provide services to include meals and medical care, NewsDay reported.

“This center will provide not just a place to stay but also critical services to support these individuals on their journey,” Emergency Management Commissioner Zach Iscol said.

The city is also slated to house an additional 1,000 illegals at an emergency shelter at the old Aqueduct Racetrack, according to The City.

With nearly 60,000 asylum-seekers in the city, and hundreds more arriving daily, the administration of Democrat Mayor Eric Adams has scrambled desperately to keep pace, packing illegal immigrants into everything from a Harlem jail and hotels to cruise ships, while shuttling them into neighboring suburban communities. 

Adams announced at a recent news conference that the city had “reached full capacity,” after being left in the lurch by an absence of state or federal help, according to TimCast.

“In the coming days, the city will begin providing 60 days’ notice to adult asylum seekers to find alternative housing paired with intensified casework services to help adult asylum seekers explore other housing options and take the next step in their journey,” the mayor’s office said in a statement.

“Each asylum seeker given notice will have multiple touchpoints with case workers over their 60 days to discuss their options and plan their next steps.”

In the meantime, the Adams administration has begun distributing flyers to illegal border crossers in an apparent attempt to dissuade them from taking advantage of the Big Apple’s sanctuary city status.

The bilingual flyers warn that “housing in NYC is very expensive” and “the cost of food, transportation, and other necessities in NYC is the highest in the United States.”

In that light, the new flyers being distributed to illegals by NYC officials also advise that “there is no guarantee we will be able to provide shelter and services to new arrivals” and encourages border jumpers to “please consider another city as you make your decision about where to settle in the U.S.”

Zelenskyy Bribing Biden w/ Criminal Evidence, Peter Schweizer Warns

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) In a recent interview with Jesse Watters, investigative journalist and author Peter Schweizer made a striking claim, suggesting that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy might exploit a potentially damning phone conversation with former President Joe Biden for political leverage.

Schweizer’s remarks, which made reference to the infamous FD-1023 file that highlights potential audio evidence of Biden’s role in a bribery scheme, have sparked discussions over the implications of the alleged conversation and its potential impact on diplomatic relations.

“If you look at the 1023 form that the FBI released. If that was true, that document reveals that one of the people that was at those meetings, that heard the conversations about bribing the Bidens worked for President Zelenskyy,” Schweizer told Watters, before alluding that the alleged evidence could be used for bribery.

Specifically, Schweizer said, “Who really wants to believe if that meeting took place and that document is accurate, that that individual did not go report to President Zelenskyy what he heard and again if that document is true, who wants to believe President Zelenskyy and his administration not use that as leverage over Joe Biden when it comes to negotiations on Ukraine policy.”

The renowned author also shed light on the potential scenario of the release of audios by Ukraine. “We may all have to start learning the Ukrainian word for compromise because this is a very clear indication of how this has shaped the policy towards Ukraine and also towards China,” Schweizer said, drawing parallels between Ukraine and China, suggesting that such incidents could influence policy decisions towards both nations.

Earlier in the interview, Schweizer torched Biden’s ever-shifting defense against allegations of his involvement in his son’s dealings.

“We’ve been at this since 2018,” Schweizer continued. “They initially said there were no foreign deals; then they shifted and said there might have been foreign deals, but the Bidens made no money; then it became Joe Biden didn’t know about the deals; then it became Joe Biden didn’t participate in any of the deals and now it is that he was not in business with his son.”

Just on Wednesday, for example, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre came under fire after asserting that Biden was not in business with his son, remarks that differ from the original defense that Biden never spoke with his son about the dealings.

Swalwell, O’Rourke Ripped for Campaigning for Alleged Trans-Pedo Lawmaker

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Democrat far-left politicians Beto O’Rourke, D-Texas, and Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., were roasted on social media and taken to task for campaigning on behalf of Stacie Laughton, the first-ever transgender state representative and accused pedophile.

Laughton, a Democrat who faced arrest for stalking former romantic partner Lindsay Groves, resigned her Hew Hampshire state representative seat after “serious” and “troubling” allegations. Those included criminal charges for allegedly conspiring with a daycare worker to gather sexually explicit photos of children, and aiding and abetting the sexual exploitation of children.

Libs of TikTok’s Chaya Raichik and Turning Point USA confronted Swalwell’s staff, asking that the representative explain his endorsement of Laughton’s campaign. Raichik asked if Swalwell would continue to endorse criminals other than pedophiles. The video showed a pride flag hanging in his offices as well.

“Eric Swalwell sure seems to choose his friends unwisely. First, Fang-Fang the Chinese spy then “Stacie” Laughton,” cracked one Twitter commentator.

Holoflix, a Twitter-based news network, also called out the two representatives.

“Remember that time @BetoORourke campaigned for former NH Rep Stacie Laughton? That aged well,” noted the Texas Family Project.

Laughton, formerly known as Bruce, was the first trans-identifying representative elected to serve in the state of New Hampshire. Laughton faced arrested for seeking pornographic images of children from his partner, who was a daycare worker.

Groves, 38, worked at Creative Minds daycare in Massachusetts, and revealed several text exchanges with photos of naked children between the ages of three and five years old. Sexual exploitation of children convictions come with a 15- to 30-year sentence, and a fine of up to $250,000.

Laughton was charged with stalking in December. The same investigation led the police from Laughton to Groves. The Creative Minds daycare center has since closed, and reportedly cooperated with the investigation.

After the initial charges, Laughton waffled on the decision to give up the state seat as a representative, drawing criticism from both parties. Laughton was previously convicted for texting 911 during non-emergency situations roughly a dozen times between May and July 2021.

Democrat state Rep Matt Wilhelm, D-Manchester, stated that there should be a special election to choose a new representative.

Biden White House in Turmoil as Spox Dodges Questions on Hunter’s Dashed Plea Deal

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The White House was plunged into turmoil as regime spox Karine Jean-Pierre faced a barrage of scathing questions from reporters following a federal judge’s rejection of Hunter Biden’s controversial, sweetheart plea deal with the DOJ.

During a press briefing on Wednesday, Jean-Pierre refused to provide the American people with answers to pressing questions about the deal, claiming Hunter is not a government official.

“Hunter Biden is a private citizen and this was a personal matter for him,” Jean-Pierre claimed, later stating that President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden “love their son.” Later in the briefing, Jean-Pierre quickly shut down any questions about the scandal facing the Biden family.

One reporter asked, “Have the president and his attorneys been in touch with Hunter’s legal team today? And have they been keeping tabs on the proceedings?”

But the White House press secretary evaded the query. “Look, I don’t have anything to share,” Jean-Pierre added. “I would refer you to — on this particular issue I would refer you to Hunter’s representative. I would refer you to the Department of Justice. I don’t have anything to share beyond on what I shared at the top of this briefing.”

The controversy revolves around the shocking news that U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika outright rejected the proposed agreement, citing concerns that the deal would provide Hunter with blanket immunity over other potential crimes.

“I have concerns about the agreement, and that’s why I’m asking these questions. I’m trying to exercise due diligence,” stated Noreika in the hearing.

During the White House briefing, a persistent reporter asked Jean-Pierre whether Biden was content with how his own prosecutors had handled his son’s case, to which she answered, “This was an independent investigation that was overseen by the Department of Justice. As we’ve been very clear, they are independent. We give them the space to do their work. We believe in the rule of law. I just don’t have anything else to share on this.”

Directly contradicting whistleblower testimony from IRS employees, Jean-Pierre doubled down on the White House’s claims that the criminal investigation of Hunter’s shady business dealings was done independently. Specifically, she added, “I would refer you to the Department of Justice. Again, this was done independently, and I would also refer you to Hunter’s representatives.”

Hunter is expected to return to court after his attorneys and federal prosecutors reach a new deal that meets Noreika’s expectations. Until then, Noreika threatened to jail Hunter if he broke the conditions to which she agreed to release him.

Congress FINALLY Investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s Finances

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) After keepings its head in the sand for years, Congress is finally investigating matters related to sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein, according to Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore.

Wyden revealed the ongoing investigation Tuesday when he released an open letter to former Apollo Global CEO and billionaire Leon Black, who paid Epstein $158 million between 2012 and 2017 for his advice on several tax and estate planning matters. Black has also been in the headlines in recent days for other Epstein-related matters, with someone suing him Tuesday for allegedly raping an autistic teenager at Epstein’s townhouse.

Wyden’s letter suggested that his investigation is concentrated on tax evasion, rather than Epstein’s intelligence connections, his friendship with multiple U.S. presidents and other high officials, his sex crimes, his mysterious death or other Epstein-related topics.

“As you are aware, the Committee is investigating the $158 million in payments you made to Epstein for services related to a variety of tax and estate planning matters,” Wyden told Black in the letter.

“In particular, the Committee seeks information on Epstein’s participation in structuring trusts and other complex transactions designed to avoid federal gift and estate taxes on as much as $2 billion in wealth transferred to your children.”

Wyden revealed that his investigation has been ongoing since June 2022.

Thus far, the investigation has found that Epstein helped Black avoid more than $1 billion in federal taxes, Wyden said.

The senator also revealed that the IRS has not audited any of Black’s trusts or transactions that are subject to the congressional probe.

And according to Wyden, Black has not been cooperative in the probe.

“You have refused to answer questions or provide documents related to payments you made to Epstein or substantiate how such payments were calculated or were compensation for services,” the senator said.

“Your failure to substantiate Epstein’s compensation scheme has heightened the Committee’s concerns about whether such payments were properly characterized as income or gifts for tax purposes.”

Wyden asked Black to provide him with information on a number of Epstein- and Apollo-related topics. Wyden seeks, among other things, a copy of a “written service agreement” between Epstein and Black, as well as information about Epstein’s financial advice related to Black’s private art collection, which is worth over $1 billion.

Black has until Sept. 23 to respond to Wyden’s letter.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Pardons for J6 Patriots Supported by Majority of GOP Voters

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) A recent survey revealed that more than half of Republican voters thought protestors who faced arrest at the Jan. 6 Capitol protest deserved to be pardoned.

Of likely Republican voters polled by the Daily Mail/TIPP, 54% said they would support a candidate that opted to forgive the protestors. Presidential candidates Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis both claimed they would pardon the protestors if voted into office.

Across the political spectrum, only 34% of respondents believed full pardons for J6 protestors would be appropriate. More than 1,000 Capitol protestors have been charged on various assault, conspiracy, property damage and restricted area offenses. Upwards of half have been convicted.

Former President Trump said he planned to pardon a “large portion” of the convictions if successful in the 2024 election.

“I am inclined to pardon many of them,” he said in a New Hampshire town hall gathering. “I can’t say for every single one, because a couple of them, probably they got out of control.”

DeSantis made similar promises on a conservative talk show, promising to comb through the cases of the J6 protestors, along with pro-life activists and parents arrested at school board meetings.

“We will use the pardon power—and I will do that at the front end,” said DeSantis. The Florida governor also discussed the weaponization of the Department of Justice and FBI to target their political enemies.

The DOJ reported that more than 1,030 people faced charges after the Capitol upheaval—most of them related to remaining in restricted federal grounds. Other charges included assault, resisting or impeding officers and employees. Over 570 of those charged pleaded guilty.

Members of the Oath Keepers received longer sentences for seditious conspiracy, with Steward Rhodes, the founder of the group, receiving a sentence of 18 years in prison.

Tucker Still on Payroll at Fox, Reveals Real Reason for Ouster

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) Tucker Carlson said he was ousted by Fox News to complete the negotiations in the $787.5 million Dominion defamation lawsuit against the network and to prevent former boss Rupert Murdoch from testifying at trial.

Fox News agreed to take Carlson off the air to settle the lawsuit, according to the Daily Mail. “They had to settle this; Rupert [Murdoch] couldn’t testify. I think that deal was made minutes before the trial started,” Carlson said in his biography, due on U.S. shelves Aug. 1.

“I mean, I know it was,” the former top-rated prime-time host of Fox said. Fox News and Dominion both vehemently denied any connection between Carlson’s ouster at the network, or that his departure was part of a behind-the-scenes agreement.

Carlson wrote he “understands” the decision, and also clarified that his exit wasn’t connected to a 2021 text message sent to a producer that stated, in part, “It’s not how white men fight,” after Carlson recalled a group of three white men attacking an “Antifa kid,” the news outlet noted.

Carlson was more riled about the defamation thrown his way from his former employer, the book reportedly revealed.

“My view was you don’t have to attack me, okay? You canceled my show but that doesn’t mean you have to tell people that you fired me – which they didn’t; I’m still on the payroll as of right now,” said Carlson, who will keep his annual salary of $20 million.

Carlson explained that he had nothing to do with the Dominion suit. The whole “claim was silly and they got it in front of some sort of partisan, low-IQ jury, and they were worried they were going to lose. So that’s not justice, that’s a scam,” he asserted.

“The whole point [of the case] was to emasculate Fox, take Fox out of the game because Fox was a huge vector for Donald Trump.”

Trump Supports GOP’s Early ‘Bank Your Vote’ Plan

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Donald Trump, the leading Republican candidate in 2024, formally supported the Republican National Committee’s “Bank Your Vote” initiative to get as many conservatives to vote early and, therefore, win the 2024 election.

“Radical Democrats have abused and taken advantage of absentee and early voting laws to build a big lead over Republicans before election day. While Republicans have worked to share our beautiful values with voters, Democrats and dangerous groups funded by the far left have simply focused on collecting ballots,” he said in a video that was exclusively obtained by Breitbart.

“It turned out to be not such a bad idea. This must change for us to win in 2024. We may not like the current system, but we need to master the rules and beat the Democrats at their own game, and then we can make our own rules.”

Trump reminded conservatives and Republicans, specifically, that they must get tougher to fight harder against Democrats so that they would not be able to “rig the polls against us on election day.”

“They rigged the election in 2020. We cannot let that happen in 2024,” he said.

Trump praised the RNC’s new program that encourages Republicans to engage in early voting in-person, absentee and mail voting and legal ballot harvesting.

“The RNC is leading the fight to help secure your vote in 2024 as well. They’re fighting bad Democrat laws, putting folks on the ground to serve as poll workers and poll watchers and engaging attorneys to monitor every step of the process,” he said.

“Go to BankYourVote.com to sign up and commit to voting early… We must defeat the far left at their own game or our country will never recover from this disastrous, crooked Biden administration.”

The “Bank Your Vote” initiative was announced by the RNC back in early June, with chairwoman Ronna McDaniel and other top party leaders endorsing the effort.

Teenage J6 Dissident (Now 21) Sentenced to Year in Prison for Sitting in Pence’s Chair

(Headline USA) As hundreds of Black Lives Matter rioters and vandals have remained uncharged for their part in widespread mayhem and destruction, a high school student who protested at the U.S. Capitol, was accused of assaulting a police officer and sat in a Senate floor chair reserved for the vice president was sentenced on Wednesday to one year in prison.

Georgia resident Bruno Joseph Cua was 18 when he participated in the the Capitol protests on Jan. 6, 2021, making him one of the youngest people charged in the disturbance.

Before learning his sentence, Cua apologized for his actions and told U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss that he is ashamed of his role in a mob’s “attack on democracy.”

“Everything that day was just one terrible decision after another,” said Cua, now 21.

Moss sentenced Cua to a prison term of one year and one day followed by three years of supervised release. The judge convicted Cua of felony charges after a trial earlier this year.

Moss told Cua that he was prepared to give him a longer prison sentence before he heard his statement in court on Wednesday. The judge said he believes Cua is truly remorseful.

“It’s a tragic case for the country. It’s a tragic case for you and your family,” the judge told him. “There are no winners in any of this.”

As left-wing judges and prosecutors, many funded by billionaire globalist George Soros, have seen violent crime skyrocket across the country in response to alleged criminal justice reform, more than 1,000 people have been charged with Jan. 6-related crimes. Cua is one of at least six Capitol riot defendants born in 2002, according to a spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s office for the District of Columbia.

Cua’s attorneys cited his youth as grounds for leniency. His actions on Jan. 6 “reflect his immaturity at the time and the effects that the crowd had on such a young person,” defense attorneys wrote in a court filing.

Around the time of the protests, Cua was finishing online coursework to graduate from high school. Prosecutors said Cua’s age is “only slightly” a mitigating factor in his favor.

“Americans who reach the age of 18 are entrusted with several important responsibilities and duties including voting, joining the military, signing a contract, and serving on a jury. In this way, the law recognizes that an 18-year-old is capable of making mature decisions,” they wrote in a court filing.

Justice Department prosecutor Kaitlin Klamann said at least five Capitol riot defendants were younger than Cua on Jan. 6. Two of the five have resolved their cases and avoided prison terms. Both pleaded guilty to misdemeanor offenses and were sentenced to probation.

Cua planned his attack weeks in advance, brought weapons to the Capitol, tried to terrorize congressional staffers and was repeatedly aggressive toward police, prosecutors said.

They added, “Cua played a unique and prominent role on January 6, opening the Senate Chamber to the rioters, escalating confrontations, and leading other rioters into and through the Capitol.”

Prosecutors recommended a prison sentence of four years and nine months for Cua. His lawyers asked the judge to sentence him to time served: the 40 days he spent in jail after his February 2021 arrest.

Cua said he was “scarred to my core” by his jail time. Another inmate assaulted Cua while he was jailed in Oklahoma, according to one of his lawyers.

“I did something stupid to land myself there, but it was traumatizing,” Cua said.

Other young rioters have received prison terms. In March, for example, U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton sentenced Aiden Bilyard to three years and four months of incarceration. Bilyard, of Cary, North Carolina, also was 18 when he stormed the Capitol, pepper sprayed a line of police officers and used a bat to break into a Capitol conference room.

Cua and his parents drove from their home in Milton, Georgia, to Washington D.C., arriving a day before then-President Donald Trump spoke at his “Stop the Steal” rally. The Trump supporters who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6 disrupted the joint session of Congress for certifying President Joe Biden’s electoral victory.

Cua was armed with pepper spray and a metal baton — weapons given to him by his father — when rioters breached police lines on the west side of the Capitol, according to prosecutors. After climbing scaffolding, Cua entered the building through the Upper West Terrace doors and and walked down a hallway toward the Senate.

“As Cua walked down the hallway, he tried to open every single office door he passed by pulling on doorknobs, pounding on the doors with his fist, and kicking the doors,” prosecutors wrote.

They said Cua intended to intimidate staffers who were behind the doors as he yelled, “Hey! Where are the swamp rats hiding?”

Cua went to the third floor, where he shoved a Capitol police officer who was trying to lock doors to the Senate gallery. After the officer retreated, Cua entered the gallery, shouting “This is our house! This is our country!” Jumping onto the Senate floor, he sat in the chair for then-Vice President Mike Pence, leaned back and propped his feet up on a desk.

Then he opened a door, allowing dozens of other protestors onto the Senate floor. Before leaving, Cua rifled through desks belonging to Senators Charles Grassley, John Thune and Dianne Feinstein.

Moss decided the case against Cua without a jury in February, convicting him of obstructing the Jan. 6 congressional proceeding and assaulting a federal officer. The judge handed down the verdict after a “stipulated bench trial,” a proceeding in which Cua didn’t contest the facts supporting his convictions. He waived his right to a jury trial.

Prosecutors asked Moss to impose a $23,485 fine, which equals the amount of money raised by an online fundraising campaign called “Bruno Cua: An American’s Future at Stake.” The website said the funds will be used for Cua’s “many expenses in his pursuit of his freedom.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press