Why the United States Lost Its AAA Credit Rating

(By Jon Miltimore, FEE) For the second time in its history, the United States saw its AAA rating on long-term debt downgraded by a credit rating firm.

Fitch Ratings said the downgrade of the U.S., which is now rated AA+, “reflects the expected fiscal deterioration over the next three years, a high and growing general government debt burden, and the erosion of governance relative to ‘AA’ and ‘AAA’ rated peers over the last two decades that has manifested in repeated debt limit standoffs and last-minute resolutions.”

In the wake of the downgrade, the first since S&P downgraded the U.S. in 2011 amid a similar debt-ceiling showdown, Democratic politicians and White House officials immediately attacked both Republicans and Fitch.

“The downgrade by Fitch shows that House Republicans’ reckless brinksmanship and flirting with default has negative consequences for the country,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen slammed Fitch, calling the decision “flawed” and “entirely unwarranted.” She was echoed by press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.

“It defies reality to downgrade the United States at a moment when President Biden has delivered the strongest recovery of any major economy in the world,” Jean-Pierre said. (CNN inexplicably blamed the downgrade on Jan. 6, even though Fitch in its report made no mention of the event, which happened 2 1/2 years ago.)

Perhaps such a reaction should not surprise us. Pointing fingers and blaming others is what politicians do best. Yet pointing fingers will not change a troubling reality: The federal government is facing a fiscal reckoning.

Most people probably don’t even know that in June, the national debt hit $32 trillion. If you find this strange because it feels like only yesterday that the national debt was $20 trillion, you can be forgiven. It practically was.

It was in 2017 that the national debt hit $20 trillion. You read that correctly: The U.S. government racked up an astonishing $12 trillion in six years. Sadly this spending frenzy will have serious consequences for the future of our children and grandchildren.

The federal government is now shelling out an unprecedented amount of money to pay interest on its debt — $476 billion in 2022, an increase of 35% from the previous year.

The nonpartisan Peter G. Peterson Foundation says Americans are likely to spend $9 trillion in interest on the debt over the next decade, making it perhaps the single largest federal expenditure in the coming years and crowding out other programs.

Lawmakers in Washington seem oblivious to the threat. Despite record revenues, federal spending continues to outpace tax receipts at a growing rate. In May 2022, the Congressional Budget Office estimated the federal government would rack up $15.7 trillion in new debt over the next decade; this year, the CBO adjusted the figure to $19 trillion, largely because of legislative changes.

This isn’t to say the debt-ceiling drama did not play a role in Fitch’s downgrade; it clearly did. What partisans are neglecting to tell you is that the standoff stemmed from the other causes Fitch alluded to in its downgrade — ”the expected fiscal deterioration” of the federal government and the “growing general government debt burden.”

These are serious threats, and instead of pointing fingers at Fitch and Republicans, the White House and Schumer should be addressing them. Instead, Democrats are calling for student debt “cancellation,” Medicare for All, and a fatter Pentagon.

There’s a troubling disconnect with reality here. It’s not unlike those who insist the historic inflation that began in 2021 stemmed from “corporate greed,” not trillions of dollars the Federal Reserve printed to flood the economy with money.

The Biden administration is of course not solely to blame for this debt. But it’s time for leaders to get honest about this fiscal recklessness, which history shows is more difficult to correct than it might seem because of the perverse incentives and corruption it spawns.

America’s Founding Fathers warned about such dangers. James Madison called public debt “a public curse, and in a Republican Government a greater curse than any other.” Benjamin Franklin called it a threat to liberty.

To keep independence, “we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt,” warned Thomas Jefferson.

People, especially leaders in Washington, have failed to heed these warnings. Sadly, it will be the generations of tomorrow who will pay if we fail to learn from our mistakes.

Native-American Org. Calls on Washington NFL Team to Return to ‘Redskins’ Name

(Headline USA) A Native-American organization released a letter this week calling on the new ownership of the NFL’s Washington Commanders to return to the team’s original name: the “Redskins.”

After years of leftist complaints about the name, the Commanders announced in 2020 that the team would officially drop the “Redskins” title and logo. They unveiled the “Commanders” name in 2022.

In a letter addressed to Josh Harris, who recently bought the team from former owner Dan Snyder, the Native American Guardian’s Association argued the name should never have been changed in the first place.

“At this moment in history, we are formally requesting that the team revitalize its relationship with the American Indian community by (i) changing the name back to “The Redskins” which recognizes America’s original inhabitants and (ii) using the team’s historic name and legacy to encourage Americans to learn about, not cancel, the history of America’s tribes and our role in the founding of this Great Nation,” the organization’s founder and president Eunice Davidson wrote in the letter.

Davidson is a “full-blood Dakota Sioux and an enrolled member of the Spirit Lake Tribe from North Dakota,” according to NAGA’s website.

If the Commanders management refuses to work with NAGA, Davidson threatened a boycott similar to conservatives’ successful boycott of Bud Light.

“NAGA stands ready to work with you and your ownership group to bring back the historic name and rebuild the team’s relationship with America’s original inhabitants,” the letter said. “Should we need to encourage a national boycott similar to what happened to Anhuser [sic] Busch(Bud Light) … WE WILL DO JUST THAT!”

As of Thursday, a petition released by NAGA urging the Commanders to take up the group’s request had already received more than 77,000 signatures.

Harris bought the team for $6 billion in May, according to ESPN.

Whistleblower: Dog Killer to Head FBI’s Training Division

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) In February, Jacqueline Maguire, the FBI’s special agent in charge of its Philadelphia office, shot and killed a dog while she was off-duty on a busy downtown street.

Not only did law enforcement decline to press charges against Maguire; the FBI apparently decided to promote her, according to FBI whistleblower Kyle Seraphin, who announced the promotion Thursday on Twitter.

“The FBI has named @FBIPhiladelphia Special Agent in Charge JACQUELINE MAGUIRE the Assistant Director of the Training Division,” said Seraphin, who has continued to release information about FBI malfeasance, even after being suspended last year after refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine.

“Jackie shot a dog on a city street in violation of the @TheJusticeDept #DeadlyForce policy. Now, she will head the division that teaches it.”

The FBI didn’t immediately respond to a Headline USA inquiry seeking to confirm Maguire’s promotion.

Maguire shot the dog, a pit bull, with her service weapon on Feb. 21.

Jane Roh, a spokesperson for the District Attorney’s Office, reportedly told the Inquirer that surveillance footage of the shooting showed that Maguire was sitting on a bench near The Touraine apartment complex with her dog, when the pit bull, a 7-year-old named Mia, “rushed forward” and pulled Maguire’s dog off of her lap.

Maguire responded by pulling out her weapon and firing at the dog.

Mia and her owner, Maria Esser, were reportedly taken to an emergency medical facility, where the pit bull later died, according to Philly Voice.

“There is no justice,” Esser told CBS. “My dog has been taken from me. Something that should’ve been preventable. Something that should’ve never happened.”

The shooting sparked scrutiny and criticism over Maguire’s use of force against the pit bull, who was described by the FBI as an “aggressive dog.”

Regardless of whether the pit bull was attacking Maguire’s dog, Seraphin noted that the FBI agent had no right to draw and fire her service weapon.

“There is no provision to defend your dog with the weapon you are issued by the FBI and you are required to use it in accordance the DOJ’s policies on Deadly Force,” he said.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Biden Admin Sued for Stonewalling on China Donations to Penn Biden Center

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) A watchdog group called the Defense of Freedom Institute for Policy Studies filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration for its failure to release documents concerning donations to a University of Pennsylvania think tank, which many suspect came from China.

The group filed three Freedom of Information Act requests with the Department of Education, requesting records of foreign gifts to the Biden Center for Diplomacy & Global Engagement, known familiarly as the Penn Biden Center, the Daily Caller reported.

In between his terms as vice president and president, Biden maintained offices there and assumed an honorary “faculty” position according to his own account, although he never taught a class.

Current Secretary of State Antony Blinken, a longtime Biden staffer, served as the center’s managing director.

In addition to information about foreign gifts, DFI’s FOIA requests sought clarification concerning contracts with the center.

“The University of Pennsylvania received a 400% increase in foreign donations after establishing the Penn Biden Center… in 2017,” said DFI Co-founder and President Bob Eitel.

“Given that the Biden Center was associated with several persons no working in very senior levels of the administration and that one of them is the President of the United States, the public is also entitled to know what role Penn or the Biden Center played in any of these decisions,” he added.

The stated goal of the center was to assist students and faculty in the advancement of “smart policy, and strengthen the national debate for continued American global leadership in the 21st century.”

Many viewed the Penn Biden Center’s relationship with China as highly suspect—particularly as investigations into Biden family dealings continue to reveal deep corruption, some of which traces back to the Chinese government.

Records already available to the public show the college received $54.6 million in donations from China between 2014 and 2019.

The center, which is located in Washington, D.C., opened its doors in February 2018. That same year, the university received $15.8 million in anonymous Chinese gifts.

Other watchdog groups requested U.S. Attorney David Weiss merge the investigation into his federal tax probe of Hunter Biden. Investigators suspect there a link between the younger Biden’s cozy relationship with the foreign power and the mysterious donations.

In a carefully worded statement, UPenn spokesperson Stephen MacCarthy denied that the Penn Biden Center was directly involved in any foreign transactions.

“The Penn Biden Center has never solicited or received any gifts from any Chinese or other foreign entity,” MacCarthy said. “In fact, the University has never solicited any gifts for the Center.”

Other Ivy League colleges have also received large amounts of Chinese money. Harvard received $75 million, and Yale $43.5 million between 2014-2019.

Planned Parenthood Fought Calif. Laws Against Child Marriage

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Planned Parenthood opposed a California bill that would ban child marriage in the state if passed.

The approval of the proposal—which would implement an absolute ban on marriages for minors under 18 years of age—faced opposition from several liberal organizations such as the Children’s Law Center, the American Civil Liberties Union and Planned Parenthood, according to Breitbart.

The abortion giant expressed concern over the ban due to the possibility of greater restrictions on abortion access for minors.

Both California and Mississippi have no minimum required age for marriage.

The state of California requires parental consent for minors to marry; however, the law would not consider sexual activity between a legal minor and a legal adult to statutory rape if married with parental approval.

Planned Parenthood spokesperson Jennifer Wonnacott said the organization “strongly supports protecting youth from abuse of all kinds,” but those protections cannot make it more difficult for minors to access abortions.

“The idea that banning child marriage—a human rights abuse that destroys girls’ lives— might somehow undermine girls’ rights is preposterous,” said Fraidy Reiss, founder of a nonprofit aimed at ending child marriage in the United States. “We at Unchained see again and again that child marriage survivors often lose all sexual and reproductive rights, repeatedly forced to have unprotected sex and forced to endure pregnancy, childbirth and childrearing without their consent.”

Unchained At Last, founded in 2011, published research revealing that 23,588 minors married in California between 2000 and 2018—making the state the second highest in the nation for underage marriages, second only to Texas.

State lawmakers in California are expected to pass the law in early 2024.

“The U.S. considers marriage under the age of 18 in foreign counties to be a human rights abuse,” Assembly member Cottie Petrie Norris, a Democrat, told the Times. “The reality is this is happening in the dark corners. It is absolutely shocking and it’s horrifying.”

Will Pelosi’s J6 Committee Face Felonies for Destroying Evidence in Trump Trial?

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) Emerging evidence shows that members of House Democrats’ now-defunct Jan. 6 Committee may have committed felonies by destroying 1.5 trillion bytes of evidence, Red Voice Media reported.

According to Fox News reporter Jesse Watters, former President Donald Trump’s legal team will be able to access all evidence collected by the J6 Committee to present at his defense in his ongoing litigation in the federal case brought by special counsel Jack Smith.

That case—one of several currently being waged by the weaponized Biden Justice Department against the GOP presidential frontrunner—is believed to have relied heavily on the House criminal referral issued by the highly partisan committee, which was hand-picked by former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

But, problematically, the J6 Committee destroyed approximately half of the evidence, meaning that the former president will not be able to access thousands of hours of footage that could exonerate him.

“The Democrat-run Jan. 6 committee is missing one and a half terabytes of data,” Watters said, noting that such a volume likely includes critical records of security failures on Capitol Hill, as well as video depositions from Trump’s Cabinet members.

The missing data will likely include emails and text messages, as well.

Of course, Watters noted, “losing or destroying committee evidence is not common practice.” It is a felony to destroy such documentation, though that has not stopped the J6 Committee from tampering with evidence in the past.

In spite of the legal implications, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., the former committee chairman, knowingly violated longstanding House rules by not turning over all the committee’s records to the clerk of the House, spurring discussion of a possible censure after House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., assumed the gavel.

Tellingly,  Thompson also admitted in March that even the committee members themselves never had access to some of the crucial—and potentially exculpatory—video evidence that was kept closely guarded by Pelosi’s goons.

“It’s strictly a new policy that the new speaker has put in place,” Thompson said.

“I’m actually not aware of any member of the committee who had access,” he added. “We had a team of employees who kind of went through the video.”

Blue State that Pushes Green Energy Delays Closing Power Plants Amid Blackout Concerns

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) California, known for its rapid push for green energy, will delay closing three gas-fired power plants in response to the increased risks of blackouts, the Daily Caller reported.

The California Energy Commission voted Wednesday to delay the closure AES Alamitos, AES Huntington Beach and GenOn’s Ormond Beach Generating Station in Southern California through 2026, instead of closing the plants at the end of this year as originally scheduled. However, the CEC will need approval from the California State Water Resources Control Board to forward with the vote, likely determined next week, the news outlet noted.

Meanwhile, green activists were incensed over the vote and said the state needed to dig deeper in its pockets and incentivize the transition to power sources like solar and wind energy.

“As long as we have these gas plants online, we never really have to invest in clean energy solutions,” said Sierra Club campaigner Teresa Cheng, who also asked the state to develop a program that would pay for residents to decrease their energy use during periods of high demand, the Associated Press reported. 

The transition to green energy has turned into a nightmare in the state. The unreliable nature of weather-dependent energy sources would demand additional backup power plants to make electricity more reliable. Last summer, officials were warned by the California Independent System Operator, the state’s electric grid operator, of a possible collapse of the grid, coupled with high demand amid a heat wave, Fox News reported. 

In light of potential energy shortages, residents were advised to be vigilant about conserving power by a flex alert, including warnings to avoid charging electric vehicles whenever possible. “Flex Alerts” were issued over a 10-day period in September 2022. Ironically, these alerts came after Gov. Gavin Newsom’s 2020 ruling, mandating all new vehicles to be electric by 2035. 

Commissioner Mark Christie stressed the need for a strategic approach to the transition from fossil fuels to renewable infrastructure without replacing output during his testimonial in front of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce in June.

“I think we’re heading for potentially very dire consequences, potentially catastrophic consequences in the United States in terms of the reliability of our grid, and I think that the basic reason is that we’re facing a shortfall of power supply,” Christie testified.

Character Assassination? UFO ‘Whistleblower’ Health Docs Show Suicidal, Alcoholic Past

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) The UFO research community has exploded in controversy after The Intercept published the health records of the purported whistleblower David Grusch—revealing his history of alcohol abuse and depression, and that he was committed to a mental hospital over these issues in 2018.

“Police records … reveal that on October 1, 2018, Grusch was committed to a mental health facility based in part on a report that he ‘made a suicidal statement’ after Grusch’s wife told him he was an alcoholic and suggested that he get help,” The Intercept reported Wednesday.

Some researchers argue that the newly disclosed health records disprove the fantastical claims of Grusch, who alleges that the U.S. government is hiding evidence of alien aircraft technology and non-humans found at crash sites.

However, others suggest that the disclosures about Grusch are a plot by the intelligence community to discredit the whistleblower as he attempts to bring information to the American people.

Still others think that there might be conflict within the intelligence community—with one faction using Grusch to distract the public with alien and UFO stories, and another faction opposing such efforts.

Grusch, not surprisingly, is claiming that there is a concerted effort to smear him.

“It has come to my attention that The Intercept intends to publish an article about two incidents in 2014 and 2018 that highlights previous personal struggles I had with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Grief and Depression,” Grusch reportedly said Tuesday, before the article was published.

“As I stated under oath in my congressional testimony, over 40 credentialed intelligence and military personnel provided myself and my colleagues the information I transmitted to the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) and I took the leadership role to represent the concerns of these distinguished and patriotic individuals.”

Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., who helped organize the recent congressional UFO hearing, accused someone in the intel community of leaking Grusch’s records. However, Intercept reporter Ken Klippenstein said he obtained them through a routine Freedom of Information Act request.

Either way, the publication of Grusch’s health records follows fantastical claims he made at last month’s congressional hearing about “non-human” bodies being found at crash sites.

Grusch’s disclosure came in response to questions from Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., who asked him whether bodies recovered from UFO crash sites were human or non-human.

“Non-human, and that was the assessment of people with direct knowledge of the program that I talked to, that are currently still on the program,” Grusch responded.

When Mace asked about evidence that documents his claims, Grush said, “The specific documentation, I would have to talk to you in a SCIF,” referring to Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities that members of Congress use to review sensitive or classified information in a secure environment.

Grusch did not clarify whether “non-human” meant that extraterrestrial lifeforms were recovered, or if the UFO “pilots” were simply animals. The Soviet Union famously put a dog named Laika on Sputnik 2, the second craft it launched into space in 1957.

Grusch further said the U.S. likely had been aware of “non-human” activity since the 1930s.

The Pentagon has denied Grusch’s claims of a coverup.

In a statement, Defense Department spokeswoman Sue Gough said investigators had not discovered “any verifiable information to substantiate claims that any programs regarding the possession or reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial materials have existed in the past or exist currently.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

American Academy of Pediatrics Set to Review ‘Gender Affirming Care’ Practices

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) The American Academy of Pediatrics announced a review of gender-affirming care practices, along with other treatments usually given to gender dysphoric children, in order to assess the effectiveness of the treatments.

Treatments set to undergo review included puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, double mastectomies and genital surgeries, the Daily Wire reported.

The AAP approved the analysis as a step to develop an “expanded set of guidance for pediatricians based on a systematic review of the evidence.”

They also reiterated their confidence in the set processes, claiming they have children’s best interests in mind when administering such treatments.

“The decision to authorize a systematic review reflects the board’s concerns about restrictions to access to health care with bans on gender-affirming care in more than 20 states,” the AAP said. “The AAP opposes any laws or regulations that discriminate against transgender and gender-diverse individuals, or that interfere in the doctor-patient relationship.”

The current guidelines for transgender medical interventions include everything from social transitioning to extreme surgical interventions, such as “facial feminization.”

The group also claimed that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones are either totally or partially irreversible, despite mounting evidence that both effect bone growth and density, voice damage, infertility, blood clotting and increased risks of cancer.

People opposed to transgender medical practices lauded the decision and expressed hope that the evidence against such care would end the practices.

“As it stands, there is no long-term quality evidence that substantiates the widespread use of puberty blockers. We do not know how this will affect children in the long term,” wrote psychotherapist Stella O’Malley. “Thankfully, last week’s decision by the AAP to acknowledge this galactic gap in the evidence will highlight how there is no evidence to support the recent surge towards ‘gender-affirmative care.’”

The AAP is the largest professional association for pediatricians in the country, with 67,000 members.

U.S. Gov’t Seeks to Gag Pro-2A Reporter Covering Controversial ATF Case

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) A U.S. Attorney has moved to prevent a pro-Second Amendment journalist from reporting information he obtained while covering the controversial AutoKeyCard Case.

U.S. Attorney Laura Cofer Taylor’s proposed gag order against AmmoLand News journalist John Crump stems from a case in which two men convicted of conspiring to transfer illegal “machine-gun conversion devices.”

As Crump has explained, the so-called devices were, in fact, metal cards with an image inspired by a lightning link etched into them. The ATF claimed that the lightning link could be cut out of the key cards and installed in AR-15-style rifles, which would convert them into fully automatic weapons.

Throughout the criminal proceedings of the two defendants—Justin Ervin and Matthew Hoover—Crump pointed out various dubious aspects of government’s case.

According to Crump, four of the witnesses stated that they bought the Autokey Card after seeing it on the CRS Firearms YouTube channel, but they never intended to cut it out. Another witness “nervously testified” that he bought the item to make a machinegun and accused CRS firearms of encouraging his viewers to break the law, Crump said.

“The ATF also admitted that the Bureau assigned twelve agents to collect Autokey Cards from the public before being told to stop by their higher-ups, who thought it was a waste of money,” Crump wrote in April.

“The ATF employees also admitted to taking classes on convincing a jury of their testimony.”

However, a jury still found Ervin and Hoover guilty in April.

Leading up to the sentencing date for the two men, the U.S. government discovered that Crump had apparently obtained a pre-sentence investigation report—a document prepared by probation officers after a defendant is convicted but before they are sentenced.

U.S. Attorney Taylor disclosed that she discovered this because the DOJ was spying on Hoover’s phone calls from jail.

Taylor complained in a Monday court filing that the pre-sentence report is “sealed and intended only to be available to the parties to this case.” She sought a court order for Crump to destroy the report.

In a scathing rebuttal, Crump said Wednesday that he will “fight with every breath in my body, not just for my Second Amendment rights, but also for my First Amendment rights.” Crump filed an emergency motion to intervene on the same day, asking the court to reject the prosecutor’s misguided request for a gag order.

“Even if there were some DOJ rule that restricted a defendant’s dissemination of such a document, it has no application to a non-party journalist’s use of the document to inform and educate the public,” Crump’s attorneys said in the motion.

“Making matters worse, the government’s only justifications for its outrageous request is that one of its attorneys does not appreciate, and asks this Court to bring to an end, the widespread public criticism received due to the government’s unpopular prosecution of this case.”

Crump said Gun Owners of America has stepped in as well and will cover all legal expenses.

“Once again, it looks like an over-zealous ATF has found itself face-to-face with a powerhouse group of patriots and legal minds who will likely remind the government why the Bill of Rights was written in the first place,” he said.

A motion hearing over the matter is set for Friday at 1:30 p.m.

Hoover and Ervin are scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 5. Ervin faces a maximum penalty of 110 years imprisonment and Hoover faces a maximum penalty of 45 years.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.