Johnson Rebukes Dems’ Plot to Fund Ukraine Despite U.S. Immigration Influx

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., made a bold statement today as he defended his decision to tie Ukrainian aid with funding for the U.S. southern border.  

His remarks came as a direct rebuttal to the Senate’s push for a broader global aid package, which includes support for countries like Israel, Taiwan and Ukraine.

In an interview with Shannon Bream on Fox News Sunday, Johnson expressed his firm opposition to what he deemed as the negligence of domestic concerns.

“We have to take care of our own house first,” Johnson asserted, directly responding to Senate Democrats’ claims that the GOP is leveraging international crises to secure border security funding.

“What this is about is advancing the agenda and the first priority is the American people,” he said, before lambasting his political opponents.

“They’re clearly not listening to their constituents,” Johnson added, highlighting the sentiments he encountered during his interactions with the American people. “If you go out into the country, people will say, ‘We understand our role as leader in the free world, we understand we’re the great superpower that needs to assist and ensure freedom survives,’ but we have to take care of our own house first and securing our border is an essential priority to American people.” 

While acknowledging his support for Ukraine and expressing his concerns about the ongoing conflict with Russia, Johnson underscored the necessity of addressing domestic challenges. 

“When you couple Ukraine and the border, that makes sense to people, because they say, ‘If we’re going to protect Ukraine’s border […] we have to take care of our own border first.’ And that’s what we’re saying.” 

The speaker stressed the urgency of implementing policy changes to safeguard national interests, particularly as millions continue to illegally enter the U.S. through the southern border. “There’s a growing consensus in the Congress, certainly among Republicans but also some across the aisle who recognize we have to change what is happening.” 

‘From the River to the Sea’: Tlaib’s Genocidal Post Condemned by Her Own Party

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., found herself embroiled in deep controversy after attempting to defend what critics described as blatant anti-Semitic criticism of Israel. 

Some Democratic politicians rushed to Twitter to condemn Tlaib’s posts, which included a video accusing President Joe Biden of supporting genocide and a second post falsely claiming that the chant “from the river to the sea” is merely an “aspirational call for freedom.”

Contrary to her claims, the phrase has been used to describe the destruction of the Jewish state. Instead, it calls for the establishment of a Palestinian state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.

Tlaib’s attempt to downplay the undertones of the disturbing chat did not go unnoticed by members of her own party.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, a Democrat, condemned Tlaib’s post in a forceful pushback.

“I have supported and defended you countless times, even when you have said the indefensible, because I believed you to be a good person whose heart was in the right place,” she said of Tlaib. “But this is so hurtful to so many. Please retract this cruel and hateful remark.”

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., who is of Jewish descent, echoed Nessel’s reamrks, saying that the disturbing phrase calls for the destruction of Israel. 

“This phrase means eradicating Israel and Jews. Period. Dressing it up in a new PR ploy won’t change that,” Wasserman Schultz said. “Only a return of hostages, eliminating Hamas and liberating Gaza from oppressive terror will save civilian lives and secure the peace, justice and dignity you seek.”

Tlaib, known for her vocal support of the Gaza Strip, notably refrained from condemning Hamas’ actions in the southern region of Israel on October 7, drawing criticism for her silence on the matter.  

From the butchering of babies and the indiscriminate murder of Israelis, the Israeli government, along with U.S. journalists, described the acts as too barbaric to stomach. 

The controversial remarks from Tlaib drew swift condemnation from Republican critics.

Pro-Palestinians Hecklers Vandalize DC as ‘Allahu Akbar’ Chants Terrorize Secret Service

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Individuals voicing support for Palestinians took to the White House to protest the U.S. support for Israel as the Jewish country defends itself against Hamas in the Gaza Strip.  

Video footage recorded by the Daily Caller depicts several protestors chanting “Allahu Akbar” (Arabic translation for God is great), while pushing the White House fence, as Secret Service agents guarded the premises. The protestors proceeded to chant “Raise your hand! Make a First! Palestine will resist.”

 

Other footage showcased a massive wave of protests filling the streets of Washington, D.C. Critics took to Twitter to condemn the protests. “100,000 strong turned out for the National Protest for Palestine,” said journalist Kyle Becker in a tweet accompanied by footage of the protest. “Now, many have surrounded the White House. They are chanting ‘F*** Joe Biden’ and issuing demands. This is why you don’t import your enemies.”

Human Events podcaster Jack Posobiec chimed in, saying, “The Palestinian protests are attacking the White House now. This is a direct attack on our democracy.”

 

As reported by Fox, the Secret Service admitted that it arrested no individuals from the protest, even though video footage shows some of them defacing the White House fence. In downtown D.C., individuals wrapped Palestinian flags around a Benjamin Franklin statue and General Marquis de Lafayette.

On the other hand, D.C. police arrested on Saturday night an individual, among the thousands that took part in the protests. 

“During the event, several minor incidents of property damage and vandalism were reported to police. One adult male was arrested for Destruction of Property in the 700 block of 17th Street, Northwest,” the Metropolitan Police Department said in a statement. “In addition, MPD is currently investigating acts of vandalism that damaged the McPherson Square Metro Station and several police vehicles.” 

Acting Chief Pamela A. Smith reacted to the protests, claiming the police department supported indiviuals’ right to freedom of speech.

“The Metropolitan Police Department handles hundreds of protests, demonstrations, and other events every year, and we support and facilitate people safely and peacefully exercising their First Amendment right to protest,” she said.

Zelenskyy Challenges Trump’s 24-Hour War Solution, Extends Invitation to Ukraine

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy rebuked former President Donald Trump’s assertions regarding the ongoing conflict with Russia, dismissing Trump’s proposed 24-hour resolution and asserting that the war cannot be resolved swiftly without territorial concessions.  

In a revealing interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker on Sunday, Zelenskyy extended an invitation to Trump to visit Ukraine, intending to explain the conflict to the former president.

“I invite President Trump if he can come here. I will need 24 minutes…to explain [to] President Trump that he can’t manage this war, that he can’t bring peace because of Putin,” Zelenskyy asserted during the interview on Meet the Press. “If he’s not ready to give our territory for this terrible man. If you’re not ready to give our independence…he’s very welcome.” 

Zelenskyy’s response marks a stark contradiction to Trump’s assertion that he could resolve the war within a day, should he be reelected in 2024. 

In a May interview with GB News, Trump said, “If I were president, and I say this, I will end that war in one day, it would take 24 hours. I know Zelenskyy well, I know Putin well. I would get that ended in a period of 24 hours. It would be easy, that deal would be easy.”

Zelenskyy, currently facing a corruption scandal that has mired the highest levels of the Ukrainian government, revealed that he hasn’t communicated with Trump since the 2020 election and expressed doubts regarding Trump’s support if he was to return to the White House. 

“Do you think he would have Ukraine’s back if he were to be re-elected?” queried Welker, to which Zelenskyy responded, “I don’t know. Really, I don’t know. I hope that it depends not only on the president institutionally. I think it depends on the opinion of Americans, of your society. I think that is most important. I think it’s important in the United States and EU the attitude of just ordinary people. There — it’s their support. It’s their money. It depends on them.” 

In contrast, Zelenskyy hailed President Joe Biden, lauding him as a “hero” for his support. “I’m really thankful to President Biden, by the way he was here and I think he’s a strong man. He’s a hero,” Zelenskyy commended.

Even Politico Exposes Biden’s False Claims about Hunter in Scathing Report

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) In the wake of mounting scrutiny and a Republican-led impeachment inquiry, Politico released a scathing report challenging President Joe Biden’s repeated denials of any involvement in business meetings with his son, Hunter Biden.  

Contrary to his claims, evidence from various sources suggests otherwise, including details from the infamous Hunter laptop and testimonies from former associates, casting doubt on the president’s assertions.

Politico, not exactly a conservative news outlet, unveiled discrepancies that raise significant concerns about the veracity of Biden’s statements, much of which were already reported by right-leaning outlets.

From the Russian disinformation hoax and Biden’s business connections to profiting off the Biden name and dealings involving Chinese funds, the evidence is undeniably damning.

Specifically, the report referenced an email trail from the infamous Hunter laptop, which revealed a meeting at Café Milano involving Biden and executives from Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian gas company. The White House vehemently denied such interaction but sworn-in testimony from former Hunter business associate Devon Archer corroborated the reality of the meeting. 

Responding to these allegations, the White House shifted its tune. “The President was not involved in any business dealings with his son or any other family member,” a spokesperson claimed, according to Politico. “Testimonies from House Republicans’ own witnesses, including Devon Archer, confirm that there were no discussions about business between the President and his son.” 

Moreover, the report debunked the claim that the laptop’s contents were part of a Russian disinformation campaign, a narrative that had been widely discredited. Strikingly, it was Politico itself that published a public letter signed by 51 former intelligence experts who falsely claimed the laptop was part of a Russian smear campaign. 

Politico’s new report provided further evidence contradicting Biden’s long-held assertion that he never engaged in discussions about business matters with family members. This assertion was challenged by former Hunter associate Tony Bobulinski, who claimed that he had discussed Chinese business dealings with the president himself during an encounter in October 2020. 

“At my approximately hour-long meeting with Joe that night, we discussed the Bidens’ history, the Bidens’ family business plans with the Chinese, with which he was plainly familiar, at least at a high level,” Bobulinski said in the statement 

In recent days, Bobulinski publicly urged Biden to confront congressional investigations and say, under oath, that he never engaged in any discussions regarding business matter involving his family.

Tech Industry Intent on Producing ‘Humanoid’ Robots

(Headline USA) Building a robot that’s both human-like and useful is a decades-old engineering dream inspired by popular science fiction.

While the latest artificial intelligence craze has sparked another wave of investments in the quest to build a humanoid, most of the current prototypes are clumsy and impractical, looking better in staged performances than in real life. That hasn’t stopped a handful of startups from keeping at it.

“The intention is not to start from the beginning and say, ‘Hey, we’re trying to make a robot look like a person,’” said Jonathan Hurst, co-founder and chief robot officer at Agility Robotics. “We’re trying to make robots that can operate in human spaces.”

Do we even need humanoids? Hurst makes a point of describing Agility’s warehouse robot Digit as human-centric, not humanoid, a distinction meant to emphasize what it does over what it’s trying to be.

What it does, for now, is pick up tote bins and move them. Amazon announced in October it will begin testing Digits for use in its warehouses, and Agility opened an Oregon factory in September to mass produce them.

Digit has a head containing cameras, other sensors and animated eyes, and a torso that essentially works as its engine. It has two arms and two legs, but its legs are more bird-like than human, with an inverted knees appearance that resembles so-called digitigrade animals such as birds, cats and dogs that walk on their toes rather than on flat feet.

Rival robot-makers, like Figure AI, are taking a more purist approach on the idea that only true humanoids can effectively navigate workplaces, homes and a society built for humans. Figure also plans to start with a relatively simple use case, such as in a retail warehouse, but aims for a commercial robot that can be “iterated on like an iPhone” to perform multiple tasks to take up the work of humans as birth rates decline around the world.

“There’s not enough people doing these jobs, so the market’s massive,” said Figure AI CEO Brett Adcock. “If we can just get humanoids to do work that humans are not wanting to do because there’s a shortfall of humans, we can sell millions of humanoids, billions maybe.”

At the moment, however, Adcock’s firm doesn’t have a prototype that’s ready for market. Founded just over a year ago and after having raised tens of millions of dollars, it recently revealed a 38-second video of Figure walking through its test facility in Sunnyvale, California.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk is also trying to build a humanoid, called Optimus, through the electric car-maker’s robotics division, but a hyped-up live demonstration last year of the robot’s awkwardly halting steps didn’t impress experts in the robotics field. Seemingly farther along is Tesla’s Austin, Texas-based neighbor Apptronik, which unveiled its Apollo humanoid in an August video demonstration.

All the attention — and money — poured into making ungainly humanoid machines might make the whole enterprise seem like a futile hobby for wealthy technologists, but for some pioneers of legged robots it’s all about what you learn along the way.

“Not only about their design and operation, but also about how people respond to them, and about the critical underlying technologies for mobility, dexterity, perception and intelligence,” said Marc Raibert, the co-founder of Boston Dynamics, best known for its dog-like robots named Spot.

Raibert said sometimes the path of development is not along a straight line. Boston Dynamics, now a subsidiary of carmaker Hyundai, experimented with building a humanoid that could handle boxes.

“That led to development of a new robot that was not really a humanoid, but had several characteristics of a humanoid,” he said via an emailed message. “But the changes resulted in a new robot that could handle boxes faster, could work longer hours, and could operate in tight spaces, such as a truck. So humanoid research led to a useful non-humanoid robot.”

Some startups aiming for human-like machines focused on improving the dexterity of robotic fingers before trying to get their robots to walk.

Walking is “not the hardest problem to solve in humanoid robotics,” said Geordie Rose, co-founder and CEO of British Columbia, Canada-based startup Sanctuary AI. “The hardest problem is the problem of understanding the world and being able to manipulate it with your hands.”

Sanctuary’s newest and first bipedal robot, Phoenix, can stock shelves, unload delivery vehicles and operate a checkout, early steps toward what Rose sees as a much longer-term goal of getting robots to perceive the physical world to be able to reason about it in a way that resembles intelligence. Like other humanoids, it’s meant to look endearing, because how it interacts with real people is a big part of its function.

“We want to be able to provide labor to the world, not just for one thing, but for everybody who needs it,” Rose said. “The systems have to be able to think like people. So we could call that artificial general intelligence if you’d like. But what I mean more specifically is the systems have to be able to understand speech and they need to be able to convert the understanding of speech into action, which will satisfy job roles across the entire economy.”

Agility’s Digit robot caught Amazon’s attention because it can walk and also move around in a way that could complement the e-commerce giant’s existing fleet of vehicle-like robots that move large carts around its vast warehouses.

“The mobility aspect is more interesting than the actual form,” said Tye Brady, Amazon’s chief technologist for robotics, after the company showed it off at a media event in Seattle.

Right now, Digit is being tested to help with the repetitive task of picking up and moving empty totes. But just having it there is bound to resurrect some fears about robots taking people’s jobs, a narrative Amazon is trying to prevent from taking hold.

Agility Robotics co-founder and CEO Damion Shelton said the warehouse robot is “just the first use case” of a new generation of robots he hopes will be embraced rather than feared as they prepare to enter businesses and homes.

“So in 10, 20 years, you’re going to see these robots everywhere,” Shelton said. “Forever more, human- centric robots like that are going to be part of human life. So that’s pretty exciting.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Trump Laps GOP Field Heading Into Next Debate

(Casey Harper, The Center Square) –President Donald Trump continues to dominate the Republican primary field, according to new polling, as his opponents are set to take the debate stage on Wednesday in Miami.

Trump’s Republican opponents will duke it out in Florida, but at least for now they are fighting for second place. The Center Square Voters’ Voice Poll, conducted in conjunction with Noble Predictive Insights, now shows that Trump far outpaces his Republican opposition, even while skipping the debates and facing nearly 100 criminal charges in four separate indictments. How those criminal charges will affect Trump’s candidacy remains to be seenThe Center Square Voters' Voice Poll - Logo - White Background

The poll of 2,605 voters includes 1,035 Republicans, 1,074 Democrats, and 496 true Independents, and is among the most comprehensive in the country.

“Trump is continuing to dominate the primary field. We have seen some changers beneath the surface,” David Byler, chief of research at Noble Predictive Insights, told The Center Square. “As Nikki Haley has shown some strength in the debates and posted some strong fundraising numbers, we’ve seen her star rise and her join clearly a second tier that includes herself and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

“But really there is only one candidate in the top tier and his name is Donald Trump,” he added.

The poll asked likely Republican voters who they would vote for for the 2024 presidential nomination, and Trump, who is not expected to debate Wednesday, has more support than all his challengers combined.

The poll found Trump leads the Republican field with 59% support among likely voters, trailed by DeSantis at 13% support and Haley, a former ambassador and governor, at 9% support.

Businessman and author Vivek Ramaswamy, who has made a polarizing splash at his debates, has 7% support while former Vice President Mike Pence, who has since dropped out of the race, is at 5% support.

TCS-VVP October 2023 Preferred Republican Presidential candidates poll

U.S. Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie are tied at 2% support.

In addition, 1% of those likely Republican voters said they would vote for “none of these candidates” and another 1% said they would vote for “someone else not listed.”

Notably, the survey was conducted before Pence announced he was withdrawing from the race.

The Republican primary’s Iowa Caucus is scheduled for Jan. 15 with the yet-to-be-scheduled New Hampshire primary likely soon after. Those early state contests mean less for stronger candidates like Trump but can make all the difference for lower-tier candidates trying to build momentum and raise money for their campaign. Performing well in those races could also set a candidate up to become a viable pick for vice president.

“If you look across the polling, Republicans really want [Trump] to have a third run at the White House,” Byler said, referencing an array of polling from multiple research groups. “You see that “Republican voters believe that Trump is electable. They like his policies. They know him from seeing him have a full term in the White House, and right now he is in a very dominant position.”

The polling also shows that voters who do not have Trump as their first choice are not necessarily “never Trumpers.” The survey found that even when put in a hypothetical head-to-head matchup with DeSantis or Haley, Trump still beats them by double digits.

In a faceoff against DeSantis, Trump wins with 68% support among Republican likely voters to DeSantis’ 32% support. Against Haley, Trump wins with 73% support to Haley’s 27% support.

“We tested specific matchups of [Trump] against Haley and him against DeSantis,” Byler said. “And what you saw when you had just a one-on-one matchup … Trump still cleaned up. This wasn’t a matter of, ‘oh could the anti-Trump forces consolidate enough and get behind a candidate.’”

In fact, Trump appears as strong or stronger in this primary than his first Republican primary, where he dominated his opponents.

“In the 2016 election, Trump was consistently below 50% in the polls and the key question was whether or not his alternatives could coalesce around one candidate who could beat him,” Byler said. “That is no longer the case. That is no longer the operative question … According to our polling, Trump is winning 2 to 1 against single candidates who are his strongest opponents, so the question here is, not can the anti-Trump forces unite. The question is, can the anti-Trump forces unite and shave off another 20% of Donald Trump’s vote share, which is a whole other ball game compared to his last run.”

The poll was conducted by Noble Predictive Insights from Oct. 20-26 of this year with a margin of error of 1.92%.

Trump’s lead over his Republican rivals has increased since the previous The Center Square Voters’ Voice poll conducted in July. The summer poll of 2,500 voters had Trump with a 53% lead over DeSantis (18%), Pence (7%), Ramaswamy (6%), Haley and Scott (4% each).

The poll weighted each party – Republicans, Democrats, and True Independents – independently, according to Noble Predictive. In other words, the Republican subsample is weighted so it matches the national Republican population, and the same is true for Democrats and True Independents.

Poll: Most Voters Would Rather Cut Spending Than Raise Taxes

(Brett Rowland, The Center Square) – American voters would rather see lawmakers cut government spending than increase taxes, but new poll results show the cuts voters want would have little effect on the nation’s $33.17 trillion in debt.

The Center Square Voters’ Voice Poll, conducted in conjunction with Noble Predictive Insights, found that 65% of registered voters would opt to cut federal spending to address the growing deficit. Some 14% would rather increase taxes than cut spending. The rest were either unsure or wanted to deal with the deficit in the future.

TCS-VVP cut spending or raise taxes

The poll of 2,605 voters includes 1,035 Republicans, 1,074 Democrats, and 496 true Independents, and is among the most comprehensive in the country.

Of the registered voters who favor spending cuts, 75% would cut services for people in the U.S. illegally, 55% would cut diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, 32% would cut environmental protections, 23% would cut transportation spending and 23% would cut social safety net programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps.

The poll surveyed likely and registered voters. Non-citizens, including permanent legal residents, cannot vote in federal, state, and most local elections.

“American citizens tend to think that the government should spend money on American citizens,” said David Byler, chief of research at Noble Predictive Insights. “So the percentage of Americans who are willing to spend on foreign aid or on undocumented migrants is going to be low.”

TCS-VVP October 2023 Taxpayer dollars saved

The Federation for American Immigration Reform, a non-partisan, public interest group, estimated the total net cost of illegal immigration was $150.7 billion in 2023, including $66.4 billion in federal spending.

The single largest expenditure by category in the fiscal year 2023 was $1.35 trillion for Social Security, according to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Put another way, the federal government spent more than 20 times as much on Social Security than illegal immigration.

But cuts to major spending categories were less popular. Some 6% of registered voters would cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. About 12% would cut health care spending other than Medicare and Medicaid, and 21% would cut spending on national defense and the military.

“You can clearly see in the polling why there’s such a logjam in Washington on this,” Byler said. “Because people say they want to cut spending, but say ‘hey, don’t cut spending in any of the areas that are the biggest expenditures.'”

About 51% of annual federal spending in fiscal year 2023 was for the Department of Health and Human Services and the Social Security Administration, according to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. The biggest drivers of the national deficit are spending on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and other entitlement programs.

“There is a little bit of a chicken and egg situation happening here,” Byler said. “People wonder, why is it that Congress can’t rein in spending and can’t cut the budget deficit and won’t cut entitlement programs? The reason is that their constituents don’t want that.”

Of the voters who want to raise taxes, most want the wealthy and corporations to pay more. Seventy-five percent of registered voters said they want people making more than $200,000 a year to pay more in taxes, and 69% said they want corporations to pay more in taxes. About 10% said they want individuals and businesses to pay more through a higher sales tax.

American Cities Considering Banning Right-Turns on Red Lights

(Headline USA) Several American cities have moved to ban right-hand turns on red lights, and they have drawn intense sentiments from both sides of the debate.

Washington, D.C.’s City Council last year approved a right-on-red ban that takes effect in 2025. New Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson’s transition plan called for “restricting right turns on red,” but his administration hasn’t provided specifics. The college town of Ann Arbor, Michigan, now prohibits right turns at red lights in the downtown area.

San Francisco leaders recently voted to urge their transportation agency to ban right on red across the city, and other major cities such as Los Angeles, Seattle and Denver have looked into bans as well.

“Drivers should not have the option to decide for themselves when they think it’s safe,” said one pedestrian survivor of a right-on red accident. “People are busy. People are distracted.”

But Jay Beeber, executive director for policy at the National Motorists Association, an advocacy organization for drivers, called it a “fallacy” to assume such blanket bans would make streets safer.

He cited an upcoming study by his association that analyzed California crash data from 2011-2019 and found that drivers turning right on red accounted for only about one pedestrian death and less than one bicyclist death statewide every two years.

“What’s really behind this movement is part of the agenda to make driving as miserable and as difficult as possible so people don’t drive so much,” Beeber said.

Right on red has never been allowed across most of New York City, where large signs alert Manhattan’s visitors that the practice is prohibited there. But it was the default policy practically everywhere else in the U.S. until last year’s vote in the nation’s capital.

Critics argue that banning right on red will not only inconvenience motorists but also slow down commuter buses and deliveries.

The United Parcel Service hasn’t taken an official position on right on red but has long directed its drivers to avoid left turns whenever possible, viewing them as inefficient.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

‘Squad,’ Matt Gaetz Use Taxpayers’ Money to Pay for Their D.C. Apartments, Costly Meals

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) It was revealed that taxpayers were forced to fund luxury housing accommodations and meals for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D–N.Y., and over 200 other members of Congress, many of whom are millionaires.

Democrats quietly included a provision into internal House rules that grants lawmakers access to an optional $34,000 annual subsidy to pay for their Washington, D.C., housing and meal expenses, the Washington Free Beacon reported.

The House disbursement records indicated that throughout the first half of 2023, the crooked politicians took over $8,700 of the taxpayers’ money to pay for their lodging and meals.

The records also revealed that, in total, 113 Democrats and 104 Republicans have taken advantage of the program, raking in a combined $1.4 million from taxpayers during the first half of 2023.

Among the recipients of these funds were at least 17 millionaire Democrats, like Rep. Katie Porter, D-Calif., who has a net worth of up to $1.8 million, and House Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., who has a net worth of up to $13.5 million.

Other Democrats who benefited from stealing money from taxpayers were also Ocasio-Cortez, who rented a luxury apartment in a building with a rooftop pool and indoor golf simulator, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., who spent over $14,000 for lodging and meals, and Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., who spent $6,800 on her lodging and meals.

Rep. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., another “Squad” member, also received $6,200 to pay for his rent and meals. In his latest financial disclosure, Bowman reported that his wife owns a pension valued at over $50 million, even though his office previously informed the Beacon in September of 2023 that the asset is worth just $50,000.

However, it wasn’t only the leftists who stole money from taxpayers. It was revealed that the person who received the largest share of funds out of any lawmaker was Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., who took nearly $17,000 of taxpayers’ money to pay for his living expenses and $6,200 to pay for his meals, an average of over $1,250 per month, from January to May of 2023.

Instead of trying to hide the fact that her husband steals money from Americans, Ginger Gaetz has been constantly bragging on social media about her husband cooking her expensive meals.

When contacted by the news source, the “anti-establishment” politician said that his taxpayer-funded meals are made with discount buy-one-get-one-free products.

“LOL, they’re all crooks. If you’ll notice, in the background of Creepy Matt’s steak dinner there’s a bottle of Opus One. Look up how much that costs!” one person on Twitter wrote, referring to Opus One wine company from Napa Valley, Calif., that currently sells its cheapest bottle for $160.