Quantcast
Wednesday, November 20, 2024

Fed. Judges OK Biden’s Lax Deportation Policies, Setting Up SCOTUS Showdown

Obama judge claims 'deep-rooted tradition of enforcement discretion when it comes to decisions ... such as who should be subject to arrest, detainers, and removal proceedings...'

(Headline USA) An federal appeals court on Wednesday allowed the Biden administration’s selective criteria on who should be deported to remain in effect, rejecting one of Texas’ challenges to the president’s lax or nonexistent immigration policies.

The administration’s victory may prove temporary if Texas or Louisiana successfully seek the intervention of the U.S. Supreme Court, which recently sided with Texas and other states to reinstate a key Trump administration policy that requires asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico for hearings in U.S. immigration court.

A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a decision last month by a federal judge in Corpus Christi, Texas, that declared the Biden administration’s interim enforcement priorities illegal.

Disregarding federal law, the administration’s declared policy is only to deport people who are deemed to be national security threats, who have serious criminal records or who have been picked up at the border.

That effectively renders powerless Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents who operate within the US border to identify illegal residents. Many of those apprehended at the border also have been surreptitiously shipped to different parts of the country rather than being deported.

The interim priorities, which are expected to be superseded by final guidance this month, adhere closely to former President Barack Obama’s directives and represent a sharp departure from those of Trump, who made everyone in the country illegally a priority for deportation.

The court noted that there were 25,916 deportation arrests under the interim rules from February through July, which was 33% fewer than the 39,107 during the same period a year earlier, though arrests for people with “aggravated felonies” rose by about 2,000 during that time.

Circuit Judge Gregg Costa, an Obama appointee, wrote that the enforcement criteria are within the president’s authority, citing a “deep-rooted tradition of enforcement discretion when it comes to decisions that occur before detention, such as who should be subject to arrest, detainers, and removal proceedings.”

He was joined by Judges Leslie Southwick, who was appointed by President George W Bush, and James Graves, an Obama appointee.

The attorneys general for Texas and Louisiana and the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Texas, Louisiana and seven other states are also challenging the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy, an Obama-era program under which hundreds of thousands who came to the United States as young children are shielded from deportation.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Copyright 2024. No part of this site may be reproduced in whole or in part in any manner other than RSS without the permission of the copyright owner. Distribution via RSS is subject to our RSS Terms of Service and is strictly enforced. To inquire about licensing our content, use the contact form at https://headlineusa.com/advertising.
- Advertisement -

TRENDING NOW

TRENDING NOW