Gillibrand’s Blatant ‘Doublethink’ on Kavanaugh Accusal Would Make Big Brother Blush

0

‘Forcing her into a sham hearing is silencing her…’

 1
Kirsten Gillibrand/IMAGE: CNN via YouTube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) It is fitting that Kavanaugh sexual assault accuser Christine Blasey Ford was a member of Holton-Arms School’s Class of 1984.

Ford’s eleventh-hour accusations against the Supreme Court nominee have taken government officials on the Left to new levels in their effort to turn America into the dystopian vision of Oceania outlined in George Orwell’s novel 1984.

Replete with descriptions of a surveillance society controlled by the omnipresent Big Brother where people are able to commit thoughtcrimes, the book coins the term doublethink to refer to ideas that mean the opposite of what they express, such as its warmongering Ministry of Peace.

And though hypocrisy has not been in short supply during the Left’s brazen, monthslong effort to block Kavanaugh’s confirmation, New York Sen. Kristen Gillibrand may just have given us one of our greatest examples of doublethink to date–or at least since the Bill Clinton presidency.

Not to be outdone by her unhinged, misandronist colleague Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono, who declared on Wednesday that all men should “just shut up and step up” by accepting responsibility for any alleged sexual assault, Gillibrand tweeted on Thursday that forcing Ford to testify before Congress about her allegations would be “silencing her.”

Gillibrand deserves some credit for her consistency in demanding accountability for sexual abusers, having also publicly criticized Al Franken and Bill Clinton for their #MeToo sins–and having promptly donated her campaign contributions from Harvey Weinstein to a women’s charity while others in her party hedged. However, she sometimes has been all to willing to let the political trade winds shift her moral compass. In February, for example, she characterized rape enabler and victim-basher Hillary Clinton as her “greatest role model in politics.”

While senators like Gillibrand and Hirono have, on one hand, complained about the reluctance of many to believe Ford’s sincerity in her vague recollection of a 36-year-old alleged high school assault, Democrats nonetheless have unabashedly used the accusations for their own political devices, engaging in political theater and even fundraising events that capitalize on the scandal while attempting to hinder a factual inquiry into it.

Holder Caps Off Foot-in-Mouth Week by ‘Mansplainin’ AG Job to Loretta Lynch

0

‘That would not have happened if I was attorney general of the United States…’

Holder blames Republican gerrymandering for unfair districts
Eric Holder/IMAGE: The Daily Show

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) For someone who last held office three years ago, former Obama Attorney General Eric Holder continues to make headlines in the worst of ways.

Holder (who acknowledges having some presidential aspirations that may help account for the recent headline gobbling) began the week with inflammatory remarks at Sunday’s Human Rights Campaign National Dinner, where he declared, “The age of bullies and bigots is not fully behind us” while taking divisive potshots at President Donald Trump and his supporters.

On Monday, the Freedom of the Press Foundation released a shocking report, revealing the previously unknown depths to which Holder’s Justice Department and Obama’s White House stooped while attempting to spy on and suppress members of the media–including Holder’s having personally signed off on FISA warrants under false pretenses to secretly eavesdrop on journalists.

While those offenses may mean nothing to the liberal base he panders too, however, on Friday, Holder committed one of the Left’s cardinal offenses by daring to ‘mansplain’ to his successor, Loretta Lynch, where she went wrong in failing to rein in disgraced former FBI Director James Comey.

“That would not have happened if I was attorney general of the United States,” Holder said on BuzzFeed News’ AM To DM. “I would have told Jim Comey, ‘You can go up there as the FBI director and try to hold this press conference, but you will leave that podium as the ex-FBI director.”

This may, in fact, be one of the few areas where Holder and Trump find common ground, with Trump having lamented earlier in the week that he wished he had fired Comey earlier than he did.

Comey drew the ire of both sides of the aisle for his perceived election interference, first in prematurely concluding the e-mail investigation into Hillary Clinton, and later re-opening it after additional classified emails were found on the laptop of Anthony Weiner, a convicted sexual predator and then-husband to Clinton’s personal assistant.

Among the many details in an Inspector General’s report excoriating the former director, top FBI officials and the Justice Department over recurrent instances of bias, compromised ethics and poor judgment was that Comey had left Lynch out of the loop when making his initial decree about ending the Clinton investigation in July 2016.

However, some have speculated that Lynch–and Obama–exerted more than a little influence on the decision to clear Hillary Clinton, despite Comey’s having publicly stated that an earlier tarmac meeting between his DOJ boss and former President Bill Clinton had compromised her credibility.

Holder told Buzzfeed that he found Comey’s remarks “hard to watch” and that “I wish I’d been there maybe an hour before the press conference had started.”

Ironically, for all his second-guessing of Lynch’s decisions, Holder–the only attorney general ever to be held in contempt of Congress–seemed a bit sensitive of criticism about his own record.

When asked about the decision not to prosecute banks in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, which had some on the Left feeling betrayed, he said, “that pisses me off.”

Holder then complained to the journalist that his job was way harder than theirs was.

“It’s an easy thing to criticize from the sidelines, it’s an easy thing to write an article about what you should have done,” he said. “It’s a whole different thing to get in front of a jury of 12 people with a standard of beyond a reasonable doubt and hold people accountable in that way.”

Could Kavanaugh Accusation Be a Case of Mistaken Identity?

0

‘There is zero chance that I would confuse them…’

Pressed on Trump Loyalty, Kavanaugh Asserts His Independence
Brett Kavanaugh/IMAGE: C-SPAN via YouTube

In the race to destroy Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, members of the Left and the liberal press have moved so far beyond the question of culpability that it is now a foregone conclusion.

Several Democrats in Congress have issued statements saying they believe the accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, even though no investigation has been launched and she has hedged on her planned testimony next week before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono went so far on Wednesday as to blame all men, telling them it was time to “just shut up and step up.”

However, not all Kavanaugh supporters are acquiescing to Hirono’s demands.

In a series of somewhat cryptic tweets, Ed Whelan, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, suggested on Tuesday that Ford may have made a mistake.

Whelan then made a bold prediction about how the narrative will unfold in the days leading up to Kavanaugh’s presumptive confirmation vote, scheduled for next week:

Whelan, a former clerk of Justice Antonin Scalia, used public records available from Zillow to essentially triangulate the possible location of a house near Kavanaugh and his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, that fit the description based on her account of the alleged sexual assault.

Kavanaugh has unequivocally denied having been at the party in question, details of which remain vague.

Moreover, at least two friends and classmates of Kavanaugh’s who were implicated in Ford’s account as witnesses and corroborators–Mark Judge and Patrick J. Smyth–have also disputed her story.

On Thursday, Whelan presented his evidence, that a house in Chevy Chase, Maryland, where the party most likely occurred was that of another classmate at Georgetown Prep, a friend and teammate of Kavanaugh’s who bore a passing resemblance to him.

Whelan named the person and posted side-by-side pictures of Kavanaugh and the doppelganger, implying that it could have been a different person.

Ford responded by telling The Washington Post, “There is zero chance that I would confuse them.”

Perhaps for legal reasons, Whelan later decided to remove the tweet thread and issued an apology for publicly identifying the other student whom he had suggested may have committed the assault.

Reactions tended to break down by party lines. Twitchy, which compiled all of the tweets from Whelan, showed some pundits intrigued by the research, which–though it may not be a “smoking gun”–would at least introduce reasonable doubt into the account, barring any “blue dress” level evidence.

Liberal “media” and social-media users, meanwhile, predictably mocked it as conspiratorial.

According to the website Law & Crime, several conservative figures, including National Review editor Rich Lowry and former George W. Bush speechwriter Bill McGurn, have vouched for Whelan’s track record as a meticulous and careful researcher.

Unfortunately for Kavanaugh, evidence and “reasonable doubt” may, ironically, be moot considerations in the courtroom of public opinion, upon which his confirmation hinges.

A poll promoted by USA Today claimed that the judge, who faced an unprecedented level of Soros-funded political attacks even prior to Ford’s accusations, also currently faces “unprecedented opposition,” with 40 percent opposed to his nomination and 31 percent in favor.

The validity of the poll, given USA Today‘s documented practice of oversampling to favor Democrats, is naturally a question to consider.

But either way, with the Senate deadlocked and no Democrats likely to defect for reasons like voting their conscience, Kavanaugh must maintain good optics–as well as offer truthful and exculpatory testimony–when he takes the stand next week.

Dems Flip-Flop Over Kavanaugh Accuser’s Testimony

0

‘We need to turn the matter over to the FBI… That’s not my job…’

Sen. Dick Durbin/IMAGE: durbin.senate.gov/Ben Sellers

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) It seems that the only things that have been consistent about Democrats’ approach to the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh are their hypocrisy and the boundless willingness they have demonstrated to disrupt the process by any means necessary.

After rudimentary tactics such as heckling the Senate Judiciary Committee and attempting to threaten and extort potential swing votes both failed to hinder what seemed like an imminent appointment to the high court, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., pulled out a familiar tactic from the Clarence Thomas hearings by trotting out the sexual assault accusations of California professor Christine Blasey Ford.

However, despite having had two months to hone their strategy since Ford’s letter was first delivered to Feinstein’s office, the ever-dynamic spin cycle has required that the leftist arm of the DNC shift its core beliefs with the trade winds. This has resulted in awkward situations, such as ignoring direct accusations of partner abuse by one of their own leadership members while elevating the hazy, decades-old recollections of a drunken high school pool party to the very pinnacle of the #MeToo movement alongside alleged serial rapists like Harvey Weinstein.

In a particularly surprising turn in rhetoric, Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, pointed the finger at all men on Wednesday, saying it was time for them to just “shut up.”

Another brazen shift in their political positions resulted from the revelation that Ford, contrary to what she had earlier, indicated, said she was unwilling to testify before Congress next week. While such a resolution had been met by rare consensus, with even the Trump White House expressing its support, several Democrats have now reversed themselves, their positions having ‘evolved‘ over the course of three days.

While the Democrats’ party line now is to call upon the FBI to investigate the 36-year-old alleged incident, the embattled intelligence agency previously said it would not do so as the matter lay far outside its jurisdiction.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, a member of the Judiciary Committee, issued a press release on Thursday highlighting four of the most egregious flip-flops:

  • SENATOR DICK DURBIN (D-IL)

THEN: “I think [a public hearing is] the only way to go at this point.” (Katelyn Caralle, “Durbin: Kavanaugh accuser needs a public hearing, not phone calls,” Washington Examiner, 9/17/18)

NOW: “We need to turn the matter over to the FBI… That’s not my job.” (Thomas Geyer, “Durbin takes White House to task over not having FBI investigate allegations against Kavanaugh,” Quad-City Times, 9/18/18)

  • SENATOR KRISTEN GILLIBRAND (D-NY)

THEN: “I’m hopeful the Senate will at least have some measure of review, maybe a hearing.” (Justin Murphy, “Gillibrand: accusation against Kavanaugh ‘disqualifying.’” USA Today, 9/17/18)

NOW: “Forcing her into a sham hearing is silencing her.” (Tweet, 9/19/18)

  • SENATOR CHRIS COONS (D-DE)

THEN: “Dr. Ford has not yet had the opportunity to come forward with additional evidence… I am encouraged that that’s what’s going to happen next Monday.” (Middletown Transcript, Coons: Senate should treat Ford with respect,” 9/18/18)

NOW: “For this to be a fair, deliberate, and open process, we need to let the FBI do its job.” (Tweet, 9/20/18)

  • SENATOR MAZIE HIRONO (D-HI)

THEN: I expect to have both witnesses come if they are willing to – and they both have expressed their willingness – and that everyone should be heard.” (Audie Cornish, “Sen. Mazie Hirono Weighs In On Allegations Of Sexual Misconduct Against Brett Kavanaugh,” NPR, 9/17/18)

NOW: “She is under no obligation to participate in the Republican efforts to sweep this whole thing under the rug.” (Eli Rosenberg and Lindsey Bever, “‘Shut up and step up’: Sen. Hirono’s blunt message to men,” Washington Post, 9/19/18)

Dem. Fundraiser w/ Christine Ford’s Attorneys Canceled After It’s Exposed

0

‘Dr. Ford’s lawyers are no longer involved in the event…’

Tammy Baldwin/Photo by Center for American Progress Action Fund (CC)

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Up is down, down is up. The sexual assault accusations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh have led to many surprise reversals, from a rare Congressional consensus to more Democratic flip-flopping than normal, to an unusually reserved Donald Trump.

But none could be as shocking as the revelation today of an honest report from CNN that undermined the purportedly non-partisan nature of Christine Blasey Ford’s 36-year-old high-school groping allegations against the judge.

On Thursday afternoon, CNN Senior Congressional Correspondent Manu Raju tweeted about a fundraiser that Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wisconsin, had scheduled with Ford’s attorney, Debra Katz. Raju said that the invitation was mailed Thursday morning for the event, scheduled for Oct. 1. After he reached out, however, it was canceled.

According to Raju, Baldwin’s spokesman replied with a statement that “The event was scheduled before Dr. Ford made the allegations,” the spokesman said. “Dr. Ford’s lawyers are no longer involved in the event.”

Social media reaction, as compiled on Twitchy, was varied, from some applauding the “fake news” network for its “random act of journalism” to pointing out the terrible optics to cautioning against faulting Ford for her attorneys’ actions.

But it was just one of many setbacks that the accuser’s narrative had to face over the past 24 hours, including the contradictory statements of a former classmate and the inflammatory, eyebrow-raising, misandrist commentary of Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono.

Ford supporters may have hoped that a letter from her fellow alumnae of the Holton-Arms School (including comedian Julia Louis-Dreyfus) would build momentum for the expressed objective of launching an FBI investigation. Despite her classmates’ assertion that Ford’s “decision to provide information pertaining to a sexual assault is not a partisan act. It is an act of civic duty,” however, her lawyers’ actions suggest otherwise.

Liberal Sens. Give Platform to Kavanaugh Accusers After Saying Men Should ‘Shut Up’

0

‘Her decision to provide information pertaining to a sexual assault is not a partisan act. It is an act of civic duty…’

Liberal Sens. Hirono and Gillibrand Give Platform to Kavanaugh Accusers After Saying Men Should 'Shut Up'
Sens. Kristen Gillibrand and Mazie Hirono/IMAGE: screenshot via CSPAN

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Offering no further corroborating evidence for the specific episode in question, Sens. Kristin Gillibrand, D-N.Y., and Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, presented a spectacle in political theater Thursday by having alumnae of the all-girls Holton-Arms school present a letter supporting the accusations of Christine Blasey Ford against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

“Dr. Blasey Ford’s experience is all too consistent with stories we heard and lived while attending Holton. Many of us are survivors ourselves,” said the letter, signed by 1,039 former students, according to their website.

Ford has accused Kavanaugh of pinning her down at a high school party and drunkenly groping her through her clothes and bathing suit while he was a student at the nearby all-boys Georgetown Preparatory.

Many of Kavanaugh’s classmates, along with female co-workers and others, have issued public statements supporting the judge’s character and have denied any awareness of Ford’s accusations. Kavanaugh himself has strongly denied that the incident occurred.

Those participating in the press conference repeatedly characterized the rebuttals to the accusations as “unfair.”

“Dr. Blasey Ford has shown that she is beyond credible,” said 2005 Holton-Arms alumna Sarah Burgess at the press conference.

Among the signatories was former “Seinfeld” actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus, a 1979 alumna and billionaire heiress to a French global merchant, who earlier in the week tweeted her support:

Echoing the previous efforts to derail a confirmation vote on Kavanaugh prior to the midterm election, which has included heckling from both paid protestors and Democratic senators, the women called on the Judiciary Committee to delay the proceedings.

“[Ford’s 36-year-old accusation] demands a thorough and independent investigation before the Senate can reasonably vote,” the letter said.

Republicans, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, and Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, have rejected the notion of a delay, pointing out that Kavanaugh already had undergone months’ worth of intensive screening, hearings and interviews before Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. dramatically unveiled the presence of the letter last week, which she had been in possession of since July.

Ford, a psychology professor at California’s Palo Alto University, was revealed to have engaged previously in women’s rights protests against President Donald Trump, although according to her own account, she did not reveal the alleged assault on her until a 2012 counseling session.

Nonetheless, in a separate letter, issued by the alumnae from Ford’s class of 1984, the women wrote “that her decision to provide information pertaining to a sexual assault is not a partisan act. It is an act of civic duty…”

The two liberal senators hosting the press event already had been vocal in expressing their belief in Ford’s accusations, despite there having been no formal investigation to substantiate that belief.

Hirono turned heads with an inflammatory statement on Wednesday, calling on men everywhere to stop questioning the accusations.

“Guess who is perpetrating all of these kinds of actions? It’s the men in this country,” she said. “I just want to say to the men in this country: Just shut up and step up. Do the right thing for a change.”

One former classmate of Ford’s, Cristina King Miranda, was forced to backpedal Wednesday on claims that the incident was common knowledge among Holton-Arms students after inconsistencies between her account and Ford’s were pointed out.

Liberals Push Corroborator for Kavanaugh Accusation; Fake News Ensues

0

‘To clarify my post: I do not have first hand knowledge of the incident…’

Liberal Media Pushes Corroborator for Kavanaugh Accuser; Fake News Ensues
Cristina King Miranda/IMAGE: Cecilia Domeyko via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Congressional partisans continued to draw battle lines over the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on Wednesday as news broke that sexual assault accuser Christine Blasey Ford would likely welsh on an earlier promise to appear before Congress.

In a bid to delay the hearing as long as possible, with November’s midterm election approaching, Ford’s attorney, along with a parade of left-wing talking heads demanded an FBI investigation into the 36-year-old accusations.

Republicans, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, bristled at the notion of a last-minute delay following months of background checks and testimonials.

“Now an accusation of 36-year-old misconduct dating back to high school has been brought forward at the last minute in an irregular manner,” McConnell said.

As liberal media attempted to impugn the only possible eyewitness, Mark Judge, as a libido-driven, woman-hating, drunken accomplice, they also trotted out Cristina King Miranda, a classmate at Ford’s all-girls school who posted on social media that the episode between Kavanaugh and Ford had been widely “talked about.”

“Christine Blasey Ford was a year or so behind me, I remember her,” wrote Miranda, who also claimed to have known Kavanaugh and Judge when they were students at the all-male Georgetown Prep.

“This incident did happen,” Miranda wrote. “Many of us heard about it in school and Christine’s recollection should be more than enough for us to truly, deeply know that the accusation is true.”

Miranda said that Kavanaugh should “admit his actions from so long ago, speak from the heart, and apologize” if he wants to be confirmed.

“Those would be the actions of a person we want in the Supreme Court,” she said.

The Facebook post was widely circulated, with Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu of California among those retweeting an Atlanta Journal-Constitution reporter’s tweet with a copy of Miranda’s original post.

“The FBI needs to interview this witness,” Lieu wrote of Miranda, before asking, “Will more witnesses step forward?”

Unfortunately for Ford and Miranda, their stories seemed to contradict one another. As reported by The Western Journal, Miranda’s assertion that it was widely known undercut Ford’s statement that she did not discuss it until a 2012 therapy session.

Moreover, while Miranda’s account would have placed it during the school year, Ford said it happened over summer.

Miranda subsequently deleted the post and ultimately issued another one via Twitter stating that she would no longer be speaking with media.”To clarify my post: I do not have first hand knowledge of the incident,” it said.

By Tuesday evening, it appeared her entire Twitter account had been deleted.

According to Miranda’s LinkedIn account, she is a self-employed performing-arts curator and producer in Mexico City whose pet causes include “animal welfare” and “human rights.” A 2017 profile says she moved to Mexico 20 years ago.

Although the connection was not explicitly confirmed, a search of the Federal Elections Commission database lists a Cristina King, also self-employed, of California, who made 53 separate donations, totaling  $1,258 to the Bernie Sanders campaign and Act Blue political action committee prior to the 2016 election.

Project Veritas Investigation Continues Rooting Out Socialist ‘Resistance’

0

‘It’s kind of like the Nixon “Deep Throat” type of thing…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) After shocking confessions from a hidden-camera interview with a State Department employee who spent his workday doing research for the Democratic Socialists of America, Project Veritas produced even more explosive revelations on Wednesday with its second video in an investigative series on Deep State corruption.

The video features proud members of the Trump ‘Resistance’ who use their positions in the Justice Department and Health and Human Services Department to promote their partisan agendas.

Project Veritas President James O’Keefe introduces the video with a discussion about the widespread problem of leakers within the federal bureaucracy.

“During the Trump administration, our government has turned into a sieve,” he says. “Leakers weaponize information in order to thwart a duly elected administration.”

Drawing from recent headlines, such as the Justice Department’s coordinated effort to use media leaks of information—some of it false—in order to obtain surveillance warrants to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign, O’Keefe says “The media, rather than expose these people and shine a light on them, conspire with them—getting the scoop and leaving the people in the dark.”

The first subject O’Keefe introduces is Jessica Schubel, the former chief of staff for HHS’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under Obama.

Jessica Schubel
Jessica Schubel/IMAGE: Project Veritas

Over a series of casual meetings with the Project Veritas undercover interviewer, Schubel, who quit her government job the day before Trump’s inauguration to pursue an analyst position at the left-wing Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, discloses that friends in her former workplace continue to surreptitiously mail her confidential information about Trump administration policy.

“It’s kind of like the Nixon “Deep Throat” type of thing,” she says, in reference to FBI associate director Mark Felt’s infamous parking-garage meetings with Watergate reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein.

Schubel acknowledges that she is able to use the advance information to disseminate copy to reporters—and speculates that the actions are “probably” illegal.

“It helps me because then I can tell other people, and then we’re all prepared for when it happens, and then we can do something about it,” she says.

Speaking with Judicial Watch’s Bill Marshall, O’Keefe anticipates critics who might try to paint Project Veritas’ undercover stings in the same swath with the government leakers.

Marshall says the difference is that one is an effort to hinder democracy and the other to promote transparency.

“These people who are leaking from inside the government are doing it to thwart an incoming president’s agenda,” he says. “We are simply trying to expose the fraud that is occurring within the government itself.”

 1
Allison Hrabar/IMAGE: Project Veritas

O’Keefe then introduces Justice Department Paralegal Allison Hrabar, who, like the previous video’s subject, was rooted out by infiltrating the Washington, D.C. branch of the Democratic Socialists of America.

Through her position with the leftist DSA, Hrabar previously led a protest confronting Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen as she privately dined in a restaurant.

O’Keefe says that Hrabar also may be using government resources through the DOJ’s antitrust division to further her ‘Resistance’ efforts.

Hrabar first acknowledges that many coworkers within her department share her leftist slant. Although some are socialists, she says, “most of them are just sort of like regular liberals” whom she describes as being “vaguely politically involved” through fundraising and canvassing activities.

She goes on to say “there’s a lot of talk at work about how we can resist from inside, and there’s a lot of, kind of, push back.”

Sometimes this involves deliberately slowing down the administrative process, she says, such as waiting until the last minute to submit a form. “It just means that they can’t start doing anything,” she says, which in her case might impact a company’s profit margins during a merger.

Additionally, she mentions a friend in the Agriculture Department whose effort to hinder food-stamp reduction policies “means that people are going to be able to stay on food stamps for another month or two.”

Hrabar also boasts of using access to confidential information to track down the address of a lobbyist, against whom she led a DSA protest. The group, she says, stalked the lobbyist’s address and then unofficially ran a license plate in order to confirm his identity.

Moreover, Hrabar uses her department access to the pricey LexisNexis database to locate information on company heads.

The video includes one of Hrabar’s fellow DSA conspirators, Natarajan Subramanian, an employee in the Government Accountability Office, who confirms that her use of the DOJ database subscription for her private partisan activities iss a fireable offence.

“People do not have the silver bullet, the smoking gun or whatever. If they were able to get proof of that, you know…? So, we’re all walking that line in a lot of ways.”

According to a press release from Project Veritas, the release of the series’ first video on Tuesday already helped initiate a response from the State Department saying they are looking into potential violations of the Hatch Act.

O’Keefe’s Latest Undercover Investigation Blows Lid Off ‘Deep State’ Corruption

0

‘I have nothing to lose. It’s impossible to fire federal employees…’

Stuart Karaffa
Stuart Karaffa/IMAGE: Project Veritas

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Undercover journalist James O’Keefe and his Project Veritas have taken on everyone from ACORN to teachers’ unions, biased journalists, Twitter and crooked Clinton campaign workers.

His hidden-camera confessionals have both effected political reform and incurred the ire of shadow-dwelling forces of corruption.

Yet, his latest effort to take on ‘Deep State’ partisan activists at government agencies like the State Department may be O’Keefe’s most ambitious to date.

As The New York Times, whose leftist agenda was earlier exposed by O’Keefe, celebrates the secret ‘Resistance’ embedded within the Trump administration through the publication of anonymous missives, Project Veritas could play an instrumental role in shedding light on bureaucratic efforts to defraud taxpayers and undermine the political process.

On Tuesday, they unveiled the first installment in their latest investigation. O’Keefe explains in his introduction just what is at stake if such activities are not exposed. “These avowed socialists—this unelected cabal—would argue that they’re saving America, but by thwarting the will of the people what they’re actually doing is subverting our democracy and setting up a constitutional crisis.”

The video then introduces Stuart Karaffa, identified as a federal employee of the State Department, who confesses to doing activist work while on the job on behalf of the Democratic Socialists of America.

“I’m careful about it” Karaffa tells the undercover interviewers, while downing pints in a busy bar. “I don’t leave a paper trail, like I leave emails, and like any press s**t that comes up I leave that until after 5:30. But as soon as 5:31 hits, got my like draft messages ready to send out.”

A private Twitter account that appeared to belong to Karaffa confirmed his DSA association, while a website for his campaign to be Advisory Neighborhood Commissioner for D.C.’s Mount Pleasant area provided some details into his personal and professional life, saying he had “spent time in government and tech.”

The Chicago native said he is an eight-year resident of the D.C. area, “with no plans to move away anytime soon.”

In the video, Karaffa seems to pin his partisan activity on the Trump administration for cutting the data analysis project he was working on.

“It gives me so much more time and emotional bandwidth to do all this stuff,” he says.

According to his own accounts, this could mean spending three hours during his workday on the Virginia campaign finance website, doing research and drafting emails for the DSA, where he says he served as co-chair of the electoral caucus.

Between clips, O’Keefe brings on attorney Steve Klein, who explains that Karaffa’s actions constitute a violation of the Hatch Act “by engaging in political activity while working for the federal government.”

Although the interviewers press Karaffa on how he is able to conceal his tracks, he seems self-assured with his ability to game the system.

“I have nothing to lose. It’s impossible to fire federal employees,” he says.

He boasts that even when disclosing his political offices on an annual financial disclosure form designed to safeguard ethical practices, “somebody just rubber stamps it and it goes forward… and so, now I can look back and be like, ‘You know, the ethics officer, he was aware of what I was doing.'”

O’Keefe also interviews Judicial Watch’s Bill Marshall, who says the key to reform is that “government employees need to do their jobs.”

“If this employee’s supervisor isn’t carefully reviewing the form and its contents, and enforcing them, then it serves no purpose other than to provide cover for the employee’s nefarious activities while he’s on government time.”

O’Keefe closes with the promise of much more to come.

“It’s necessary for us to unmask them, to personify them, to put a face to the individuals who seek to undermine the fabric our republic.”

Hillary Clinton Back to Her Old Form (i.e. Lying) in New Anti-Trump Diatribe

0

‘In my concession speech, I said, “We owe him an open mind and the chance to lead.” I hoped that my fears for our future were overblown…’

Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton/IMAGE: ABC 15 Arizona via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Hillary Clinton is at it again.

Seemingly unaware of the fact that her bold-faced and brazen deceptiveness cost her the election, Clinton—who has spent the better part of the last two years coming up with new reasons why she lost the election—resumed her equivocating in full-on candidate mode with a commentary in The Atlantic on Sunday that would give fact-checkers plenty to unpack if they weren’t so focused on cherrypicking Republican underdog candidates.

‘The Chance to Lead’

It takes Clinton a mere two sentences before the lying commences. After observing that “It’s been nearly two years since Donald Trump won enough Electoral College votes to become president of the United States” (true), Clinton issues her first falsehood by implying that she graciously conceded the election.

“On the day after, in my concession speech, I said, ‘We owe him an open mind and the chance to lead.’ I hoped that my fears for our future were overblown.”

Yet, despite Trump having never gotten his due—on account of the constant sniping in the media (perpetuated through smears from former Clinton operative Jake Sullivan and former Obama operative Ben Rhodes); the holdover ‘resistance’ that claims to be sabotaging Trump from within; and the distractions of a baseless investigation into Russia collusion resulting from fraudulent opposition research by Hillary’s campaign that has exposed deep levels of conspiracy within our own intelligence apparatus but nothing implicating Trump—the president has nonetheless succeeded in leading the country to new milestones both domestically and abroad.

Border Separation

Clinton’s next false statement pertains to the detention of illegal immigrant children at the border. Citing a statistic from the ever-reliable New York Times, she says, “the administration continues to detain 12,800 children right now, despite all the outcry and court orders.” However, the Times story, while itself misleading in the way the information is presented, buries the fact that “most of the children crossed the border alone, without their parents,” thus connecting it directly with Obama’s unconstitutional decision to encourage tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors to cross the border, with some estimates of  around 130,000 children and teens.

While the more dishonest “fact-checking” sites attempt to muddle the issue by suggesting that Obama’s welcoming of unaccompanied minors was different from Trump separating families while attempting to suspend the ineffective “catch and release” practice permitted by the Flores settlement, the reality is that Obama’s policies led to what some considered ‘mistreatment’ in detention centers. Moreover, only around 2,000 kids were detained separately from parents during the brief window in April and May when Trump permitted family separations. As of September, only about 500 of those separated from their families remain in custody while authorities work to verify the relationships.

As the Times article noted, “The big difference [under Trump …] is that red tape and fear brought on by stricter immigration enforcement have discouraged relatives and family friends from coming forward to sponsor children.” However, The Daily Caller reported that under the previous unaccompanied minor policy, roughly 80 percent were placed in the care of other illegal immigrants with the potential of being released into the hands of MS-13 gang members and human traffickers.

Hurricane Relief

Without so much as a paragraph break, Clinton jumps into her third untruth, attempting to implicate Trump in the deaths of 3,000 Puerto Ricans after last year’s Hurricane Maria. As conservative Never-Trumper Ben Shapiro noted, this is not an actual number, but an estimate of “excess deaths” beyond the normal death rate. He cites Lynn Goldman, the dean of George Washington University’s Milken Institute of Public Health, which released the estimated toll, as saying that “among all the deaths that occurred, which of them were related to Maria, which of them would not have occurred if it hadn’t been for the storm? We’re not able to say that now.”

Russian Collusion

As if worried that the truth might catch up, Clinton then, in the same paragraph, makes a passing reference to the Russian collusion investigation, attempting to falsely implicate Trump by once again conflating two separate questions: 1) Did the Russians meddle?; and 2) Was he involved in it?

Trump has acknowledged the former, and he recently signed an order that would punish foreign meddling, though some media reports, unsurprisingly, attempted to spin it against him. By contrast, even as Obama claimed to be aware of Russian meddling, he did nothing to prevent it under the presumption that it would benefit Clinton.

Of course, Hillary’s claim is particularly disingenuous in light of the many documented instances of largely Chinese election meddling and campaign funding violations that occurred under Bill Clinton. Furthermore, whatever Trump did or did not do, there has been little attention paid to the fact that Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, likely was engaging inappropriately with a number of foreign entities who then contributed to a campaign slush fund via the Clinton Foundation, including her dealings with Russia via the Uranium One company.

All in all, Clinton’s nearly 2,600 word diatribe/stump speech is packed so full of fabrications and a lack of self awareness that adding the proper context to every whopper would take up more server space than her 30,000 missing emails.

“Trump and his cronies do so many despicable things that it can be hard to keep track,” she ironically claims.

Fortunately, those who may feel a tinge of buyer’s remorse need only consider the alternative.