NeverTrumpers Cozy Up to Biden in Desperate Bid to Sway Crossover Votes

0

‘The last thing any of us want is to have a socialist president…’

Joe Biden and John Kasich / IMAGE: University of Delaware via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Having already gravely misread the spirit of the times during the 2016 election, NeverTrumpers have, once again, missed the mark in a desperate bid to support former Vice President Joe Biden, warts and all.

The New York Post reported that it had obtained emails revealing a group of former John Kasich campaign officials was leading the last-minute bid to court crossover voters on behalf of Biden.

While some indications were that they saw Biden as the only viable Democrat with enough mainstream appeal to defeat President Donald Trump in November, the primary motivator, according to those familiar with the matter, seemed to be sour grapes.

“They’re not rational people,” a GOP source told the Post.

“They want revenge,” the source continued. “Trump beat them, and they want revenge.”

Cascading Fortunes

The former vice president’s fortunes have foundered lately, much due to the pall that recent partisan efforts to impeach Trump have cast over Biden’s and his son Hunter‘s corrupt Ukraine dealings.

Hunter Biden was paid millions in “consulting” fees to serve on the corrupt Burisma energy company’s board for five years, until he resigned his position last April.

Trump’s defense team successfully argued that the president was justified in calling for the newly elected Ukrainian president to re-open investigations into Burisma and Joe Biden’s role in firing the prosecutor who was investigating it in 2016.

Although Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has yet to reopen those investigations, the U.S. Justice Department announced recently that it was working with Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani to gather information about the Obama-era scandal.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-SC, has said the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is likely to investigate as well.

The Bidens’ Ukraine arrangement was but one of many ethical conflicts of interests and questionable quid-pro-quo arrangements that have since come to light involving the longtime Delaware senator’s children and siblings.

CNN, NYT, Propagand
Hunter and Joe Biden / IMAGE: Donald J Trump via Youtube

While the scandal-plagued former front-runner was able to maintain his standing in the polls for much of the past year, the surprise result at last week’s Iowa Democratic caucus put Biden in fourth place, behind former Mayor Pete Buttigieg, and Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

Left-leaning pollster Morning Consult, announced that for the first time on Tuesday Sanders had surpassed Biden in popularity, 25% to 22% among a survey of 5,000 registered voters nationwide.

The left-wing FiveThirtyEight blog now gives Biden a one-in-five chance of winning the nomination, down from one-in-three before Iowa. By comparison, the odds are one-in-four that no Democratic candidate will win the majority, forcing a brokered convention.

Holding Out Hope

Even so, the NeverTrump Kasich allies, whose efforts in New Hampshire are being funded by former Microsoft President Jon Shirley and his wife, have not lost hope in a resurgence.

“They think Biden is the only candidate who can beat Trump at the general election,”a GOP source told the Post.

The Shirleys gave $75,000 to fund the Defenders PAC, which was established last September.

The group had planned on using interactive voice-response polling to identify registered Republicans as potential cross-over voters, but it missed the Oct. 25 deadline for switching party registration in New Hampshire, waiting too late to roll out its campaign.

Biden, meanwhile, has sought to temper expectations leading into Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary, saying he expects another throttling.

Pinning his hopes, instead, on a strong showing in South Carolina, Biden even scaled back his operations recently in the Granite State, which prides itself on being the feisty, rebellious twin of Sanders’s home state of Vermont.

The Lesser ‘Evil’

Bernie Says He's Eyeing Female VP Candidate, Right After Saying Gender Shouldn't Be a Factor
Bernie Sanders / IMAGE: The Young Turks via Youtube

Some supporters of the Biden efforts seemed genuinely concerned—not that Sanders would be a weak candidate but that he could be a viable one.

Matt Borges, a former Ohio GOP chairman who backed Kasich’s presidential bid last election and gave $1,000 to the Defenders PAC—making him the only donor outside of the Shirleys—said that the fear of Trump losing to Sanders was the greatest of all.

“To some extent, it’s unclear how vulnerable President Trump might be, and the last thing any of us want is to have a socialist president,” Borges said.

Left-wing commentator Krystal Ball told Fox News host Tucker Carlson that even many Democrats were fearful of what a Sanders sweep of the primaries could mean.

Much as DC’s Republican insiders felt threatened by Trump’s promises to “drain the swamp,” some on the Left who have feathered their nests in the corporate world are now “apprehensive” about the socialist-friendly senator’s views of capitalism, she said.

“These are all people whose power comes from their access to the establishment world—consultants whose grift is based on a certain deal flow from the DNC, etc.—and they know what you said about they prefer Trump to Bernie,” Ball told Carlson.

“That’s exactly right because they know under a Sanders administration, all of that access and all of that deal flow, all of that is gone and it truly is over for them,” she said.

Angling for Veep?

The role of Kasich’s allies may raise questions about a split-ticket coalition with the former Ohio governor—now a CNN analyst—serving as Biden’s running mate.

Biden—who has cozied up to Kasich in the past, including during a 2017 “Bridging the Divides” event at the University of Delaware’s Biden Institute—signaled during a New Hampshire town hall event last year that he would consider selecting a Republican running mate.

However, he also has indicated that he would like a minority and female running mate, leaving Kasich an unlikely first option.

Kasich’s own clout with GOP crossover voters also remains doubtful. A recent article in conservative PJ Media called on people to stop using the misnomer “NeverTrump Republicans” as a label since many have publicly disavowed their GOP ties.

Kasich, while governor of Ohio, was more popular with the Democrats in his state than the Republicans toward the end of his term.

NYPD Union ‘Declares War’ on de Blasio after Spike in Anti-Cop Violence

‘NYPD cops have been assassinated because of you…’

(Claire Russel, Liberty Headlines) One of New York City’s announced this week it is “declaring war” on Mayor Bill de Blasio following a pair of shootings that targeted police officers in the Bronx this weekend.

De Blasio has used hateful rhetoric that inspires violence against the city’s law enforcement, the Sergeants Benevolent Association said, and he has passed policies that are hostile to police.

“These targeted attacks are exactly what we have warned against, again and again,” said Patrick Lynch, president of the New York City Police Benevolent Association, in a statement this weekend after two officers were shot Saturday morning.

“The hatred and violence directed at cops continues to grow,” Lynch continued. “Good luck and kind words are not enough to keep police officers or the public safe. Our elected officials need to start listening to us and working with us—not against us—to fix the deteriorating environment on our streets.”

De Blasio put an end to the city law enforcement’s stop-and-frisk policy, which allowed officers to detain and search suspects for weapons, and has introduced other criminal justice reforms that have tied cops’ hands when it comes to crime, Lynch explained.

“The double-digit increases in shootings, robberies, burglary and thefts aren’t the product of any single law or policy,” Lynch said, according to Fox News. “They are the result of failed leadership and a political culture that denigrates and devalues the work police officers do.”

President Donald Trump expressed his support for New York City’s law enforcement and blamed de Blasio’s “weak leadership” after this weekend’s string of attacks.

In 1972, Bernie Sanders Said He Didn’t Care If People Called Him a ‘Communist’

‘At least he’s true to what he believes…’

(Claire Russel, Liberty Headlines) President Donald Trump recently slammed presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders as a “communist.”

Sanders dismissed Trump’s comments last week, but back in 1972, when the U.S. was at the height of the Cold War, he admitted that had no problem being associated with communism.

“I don’t mind people coming up and calling me a communist,” Sanders, then a gubernatorial protest candidate for the socialist Liberty Union Party, said during a campaign pitch in Vermont.

Sanders and the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which he helped co-found with Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., have been tied to far-left political parties that have endorsed communist-like platforms.

In 1980 and 1984, Sanders endorsed Socialist Workers Party presidential candidates Andrew Pulley and Mel Mason, who advocated for dismantling the entire U.S. military and nationalizing entire industries. Sanders was even investigated by the FBI at one point for his ties to SWP, but charges were never brought, according to the Washington Examiner.

And in 1983, Soviet Embassy First Secretary Vadim Kuznetsov congratulated Sanders on his reelection as mayor of Burlington, Vermont, according to The Washington Post.

In 1989, Sanders traveled to Cuba hoping to meet communist dictator Fidel Castro, and returned to the U.S. defending parts of Castro’s regime. The Cuban revolution was “far deeper and more profound than I had understood it to be,” Sanders claimed, according to the Miami Herald.

Trump reminded voters of Sanders’s past during a recent pre-Super Bowl interview with Fox News’s Sean Hannity.

“I think he’s a communist. I mean, you know, look, I think of communism when I think of Bernie,” Trump said. “Now, you could say socialist, but didn’t he get married in Moscow?”

Hannity interjected and reminded Trump that Sanders had only honeymooned in the Soviet Union.

“I think of Bernie sort of as a socialist but far beyond a socialist,” Trump continued. “At least he’s true to what he believes.”

Sanders’s campaign has argued that Sanders, who identifies as a democratic socialist, has done the most to sound the alarm against growing authoritarianism, and how authoritarianism feeds off of corruption, inequality and oligarchy—not just of any of the candidates, but of any American leader period.”

WATCH: AOC Confuses Economists and Makes Up ‘Famed Economist Milton Keynes’

‘UGGGH TYPO…’

(Claire Russel, Liberty Headlines) Rep. Alexandria Ocasio–Cortez, D-N.Y., who regularly brags about her economics degree from Boston University, confused economic John Maynard Keynes with Milton Friedman, citing “famed economist Milton Keynes” in a rant about the U.S. economy.

Ocasio–Cortez claimed that “Milton Keynes” predicted back in 1930 that in 2030, “GDP and technology would have advanced so much that it would allow everyday people to work as little as 15 hours a week and provide for their families.”

Technological advancement and economic growth have both “advanced wildly since the 1960s,” Ocasio–Cortez admitted, before arguing that wealth inequality has largely prohibited working adults from experiencing shorter work days.

After being called out for wrongly attributing the quote, Ocasio–Cortez wrote in a subsequent Instagram story, “UGGGH TYPO. It’s John Maynard Keynes. Mixed his name with Milton Friedman — a (very) different economist.”

Ocasio-Cortez regularly boasts about her economics degree and uses it to justify advocating for increased government regulation.

Keynes was an economist who contributed to the idea that increased government spending could increase economic productivity, while Friedman was a staunch free market advocate.

There is a city called Milton Keynes approximately 50 miles north of London, England. However, it is not known to have made any substantial contributions in the field of economics.

Pro-Life Group Endorses Sen. Kelly Loeffler 2 Months After It Opposed Her Appointment

‘She went through a rigorous, multi-faceted endorsement process and her responses were among some of the strongest we have ever seen…’

Pro-Life Group Endorses Sen. Kelly Loeffler After Opposing Her Senate Appointment
Kelly Loeffler / IMAGE: PBS NewsHour via Youtube

(Claire Russel, Liberty Headlines) A major pro-life advocacy group endorsed Sen. Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., for reelection on Monday after initially opposing her appointment to the Senate last year.

The Susan B. Anthony List came out against Republican Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp’s decision in December to appoint Loeffler based on the belief that Loeffler was weak on abortion restrictions.

But now, the group has declared Loeffler a “strong pro-life, pro-woman leader.”

The flip-flop is the result of substantive actions Loeffler has taken to prove she is committed to the pro-life movement, according to SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser.

“Loeffler has earned the support of the pro-life movement by leading and speaking out for life,” Dannenfelser said in a statement.

“At her appointment, she committed to supporting the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act and to confirming President Trump’s pro-life judges, SBA List’s top two priorities,” Dannenfelser continued. “Senator Loeffler co-sponsored three major pro-life bills during her first week in office and she spoke out during the March for Life. She went through a rigorous, multi-faceted endorsement process and her responses were among some of the strongest we have ever seen.”

SBA List was wary of Loeffler’s appointment because of Loeffler’s past position on the board of a Georgia hospital that provided abortions. Since then, Loeffler has met with SBA List, along with other conservative groups such as the Club for Growth and the National Rifle Association, and earned their support.

“Sen. Loeffler will continue to be a formidable champion of unborn children and their mothers, and we greatly look forward to working together on these and other top pro-life priorities,” Dannenfelser said.

The endorsement is important for Loeffler, who faces a primary challenge from Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., one of President Donald Trump’s top congressional allies.

Trump has not weighed in on the intra-party fighting, but the National Republican Senatorial Committee has remained firmly committed to Loeffler’s campaign.

During a post-acquittal celebration speech last Thursday at the White House with his top GOP supporters, Trump acknowledged Collins’s efforts to square off against Rep. Jerrold Nadler on the House Judiciary Committee.

He expressed hope that something might happen that would mend the rift between the two Georgia conservatives and avoid a contentious primary that could cost the seat.

“I know Kelly—you’re going to end up liking him a lot,” he said.

“Something’s gonna happen that’s going to be very good,” he added. “I don’t know. I haven’t figured it out yet.”

Dem Operatives: Primary Chaos Boosts Chance of a Surprise Nominee

0

‘There’s a real possibility of a brokered convention and that in itself may be enough to serve as motivation for some who might have otherwise dropped out…’

Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton/IMAGE: ABC 15 Arizona via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Those prone to theorize about a nefarious plot by establishment Democrats to avoid the vetting of their 2020 candidate have new reason to wonder following the disastrous Iowa primary and recent intra-party clashes.

Suspicions were rampant in the fall that former First Lady Michelle Obama, failed 2016 candidate Hillary Clinton or another surprise contender might swoop in at the last minute.

They went largely dormant in January, after crucial filing deadlines passed to land on the ballot in major-delegate states like California. That narrowed the options of a yet-unannounced player to either a write-in campaign or a brokered convention if no single candidate won the majority of delegates.

But the failures of the Iowa app—which was backed by Clinton allies, along with funding from shady leftist mega-donor George Soros —invited questions as to whether the end game might be a deliberate attempt to engineer a surprise outcome.

The Hill noted that, according to the left-wing FiveThirtyEight blog, there now was a nearly one-in-four chance that no candidate would win a majority of delegates. By comparison, recent analyses gave former Vice President Joe Biden, the longtime favorite, a one-in-five chance.

With many fearing that the collateral damage of the primaries could help fuel President Donald Trump’s general election chances, a brokered convention could circumvent the entire the primary process—and the devastating political vetting that has gone alongside it.

“There’s a real possibility of a brokered convention—and that, in itself, may be enough to serve as motivation for some who might have otherwise dropped out, to hang around longer to see if they can’t have a place in this thing and play a part in determining the nominee,” said Jim Demers, a veteran Democratic strategist in New Hampshire, according to The Hill.

“Resources will be key,” Demers added.

Follow the Money…

In advance of Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary, party leaders there suggested that the late-entry of one wealthy, ascendant candidate could further contribute to the subversion of the Democratic nominating contest.

Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who entered the race late last year, announced that he planned to bypass several of the early primaries, deeming them a waste of time.

Bloomberg's Move Reveals Distaste for Biden, 2020 Democrats
Michael Bloomberg/Photo by Gage Skidmore (CC)

While Bloomberg will be on the ballot in March 3 “Super Tuesday” states, when most of the primary voters will have their say, that only raises the likelihood of more chaos to come.

“I think Bloomberg entering into this thing provides a much greater possibility of a brokered convention,” said Chris Spirou, a former New Hampshire Democratic Party chairman

Bloomberg—one of the top Democratic donors of all time, along with Soros and fellow 2020 candidate Tom Steyer—has quickly risen in the polls while using his vast personal war-chest to inundate the airwaves and the internet with advertising.

Despite his extreme stances on issues like climate change that have raised serious ethical concerns, the media-mogul—who first governed the Big Apple as a Republican before switching parties—has sought to stake out the same “moderate” turf as waning ex-front-runner Biden.

Risk Versus Reward

The Hill said that relying on a brokered convention, which would put the decision in the hands of convention super-delegates over the delegates sent there to represent the will of the people, posed an inherent political risk.

State of the Union compromise greatness 2
Sen. Bernie Sanders reacts to Trump vowing not to let America become a socialist country. / IMAGE: Screenshot via Yahoo News

The bases supporting a particular candidate—such as those of Iowa co-victors Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg—might sit out the November election in protest.

Many have openly doubted the fitness of the far-left Sanders to take on Trump, resulting in a newfound sense of defeatist resignation in the Left’s discussions behind closed doors.

“There’s a new fatalism in my conversations with Democrats, with many telling me that what once seemed unthinkable,” wrote Axios’s Mike Allen. “Trump’s re-election in November—is now starting to look more likely than ever.”

But despite disfranchising its own voters in favor of party elites, the brokered-convention strategy bears all the hallmarks of other recent Democratic maneuvers, such as the impeachment effort against Trump, to leave nothing to chance in their attempt to unseat the president.

“It would be much better if we had a candidate win a sufficient number of delegates going into the convention,” Spirou said, “but I’m confident we’ll have a candidate coming out of it who can defeat Trump.”

Secret Preparations?

While The Hill focused mainly on the possibility of a Bloomberg spoiler campaign, it hinted that there was still room for another candidate, like Michelle Obama, who may have secretly been securing donors and backers behind the scenes, to coast into the race under such circumstances.

Former President Barack Obama has been noticeably quiet during the primary, while subtly badmouthing leading candidates like Biden and Sanders.

 1
Michelle Obama / IMAGE: NJ.com via Youtube

On the few occasions when Obama has spoken publicly, he has offered vague suggestions that did little to dispel the speculation of a late run for his wife. He has suggested that a female candidate was preferred and encouraged those running to pledge all their resources to the eventual nominee.

Likewise, frequent kingmaker Soros pointedly decided to remain on the sidelines during the primary.

Most agree that the eventual Democratic candidate will need a substantial war-chest—but whether they believe that points to Bloomberg or if the billionaire is simply a red herring, it remains anyone’s guess.

Some leftist spin-doctors sought to downplay the disarray and divisiveness of a brokered convention, suggesting it could provide a jolt of excitement to the party’s politics after an exhausting, drawn-out primary battle.

“Every four years there’s this fantasy about the possibility and how fun and exciting it would be,” veteran Democrat operative Joe Trippi told The Hill.

“This year you have the Iowa muddle, Bloomberg’s billions, Biden’s strength with African Americans, so it could happen,” Trippi added. “And if it doesn’t happen with all that’s going on this time around, forget it, it’ll never happen.”

WATCH: Biden Calls Female Voter a ‘Lying Dog-Faced Pony Soldier’

Former Vice President apparently didn’t like question about losing Iowa…

(Claire Russel, Liberty Headlines) Presidential hopeful Joe Biden told a female college student she was a “lying dog-faced pony soldier” after she asked him why voters should trust he can win the general election given his poor performance in the Iowa caucus.

The voter, identified as Madison Moore, asked Biden at a New Hampshire event, “So you’re arguably the candidate with the greatest advantage in this race. You were vice president. You weren’t burdened down by the impeachment trial. So how do you explain the performance in Iowa, and why should voters believe that you can win the national election?”

Biden then took the microphone and said, “It’s a good question. Number one, Iowa is a Democratic caucus. Have you ever been to a caucus,” he asked the woman.

The woman nodded, which prompted Biden to quip, “No, you haven’t. You’re a lying, dog-faced pony soldier … You said you were. Now you’ve got to be honest.”

“Now I’m going to be honest with you,” Biden continued, before admitting that Iowa was “confusing.’

Still, he insisted that the primary caucus results will not determine who can win swing states such as Michigan and Pennsylvania.

Moore said that she understood Biden was joking, but she clarified that his answer did not erase her doubts about his electability.

“A lot of what he’s saying seems to be really sad,” she later said, according to the Washington Examiner. “We had heard a lot about deaths and cancer and people losing their jobs, and to me, he doesn’t really seem very solution-oriented.”

Biden’s campaign has lost steam over the past few weeks.

He came in fourth place in Iowa, and he is lagging in polls in New Hampshire, too.

Biden’s poor performance has come as a surprise to his staff, many of whom are relying on South Carolina’s results to revive the former vice president’s drowning campaign.

Liberals Furious Facebook, Twitter Won’t Remove Edited SOTU Video of Pelosi

‘Are you suggesting the President didn’t make those remarks and the Speaker didn’t rip the speech?’…

Petty Pelosi Shreds Trump's Speech Right After Conclusion
Nancy Pelosi/AP Photo

(Claire Russel, Liberty Headlines) Liberals are furious with a diced-up video shared by President Trump that shows House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ripping a copy of Trump’s State of the Union address.

The video was edited to show Pelosi tearing up Trump’s speech after each introduction of his guests in the Senate gallery — many of them American heroes — or following his announcement of great economic news for groups of citizens whose votes Democrat candidates hope to earn in November.

The point of the video, created by conservative group Turning Point USA, was to show that Pelosi’s disrespectful actions “ripped to shreds” the “powerful American stories” Trump shared during her address.

Pelosi’s chief of staff, Drew Hammill, demanded Twitter and Facebook remove the video, and when the social media platforms refused, Hammill claimed the companies “care more about their shareholders’ interests than the public’s interests.”

Several Democratic members of Congress also demanded Twitter remove the video, despite the fact that it does not technically violate the platform’s rules.

Facebook’s policy communications manager defended the social media company’s decision to reject Hammill’s request, and said:

Stone explained to Business Insider that Facebook only removes media that has “been edited or synthesized — beyond adjustments for clarity or quality — in ways that aren’t apparent to an average person and would likely mislead someone into thinking that a subject o the video said words that they did not actually say.”

Facebook also requires the edit to be the “product of artificial intelligence or machine learning that emerges, replaces, or superimposes content onto a video, making it appear to be authentic,” Stone continued.

TPUSA’s video of Pelosi did not fall short of any of those standards, he concluded.

Americans who watched the speech know that Pelosi destroyed her entire copy of the speech after the conclusion of the State of the Union.

Ilhan Omar Goes on Anti-American Rant: U.S. to Blame for ‘Catastrophes’ Abroad

0

‘We often are like, “Oh this is my neighbor, they must have some struggle.” We don’t ever pause to think, “What American policy made them come over here?”‘

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) In a more than four-minute rant during a Howard University “radical democracy” event on Friday, Somali-born Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., further signaled her ingratitude to the country that offered her save-haven and refuge as a child—by instead blaming the U.S. for creating the suffering of other nations.

Omar’s native Somalia, a country run by militaristic warlords, is one of the top safe-havens for Islamic terrorism.

Following Somalia’s 1993 civil war, during the administration of Democrat President Bill Clinton, United Nations peacekeeping forces attempted to intervene but were forced withdraw due to disastrous events like the notorious downing of a U.S. Black Hawk helicopter.

Yet, rather than reflect with humility on her homeland’s self-wrought problems, Omar has frequently proven that no good deed goes unpunished when leftist entitlement mentality is at play.

“We often are like, ‘Oh this is my neighbor, they must have some struggle,’ she said during the Howard University event, as reported by the Washington Free Beacon. “We don’t ever pause to think, ‘What American policy made them come over here?’”

Since taking office last year, the freshman congresswoman has been under investigation for an array of fraud-related allegations—including her misappropriation of campaign expenses, lying on her taxes, and possibly marrying her brother in order to commit immigration and student-loan fraud.

After facing criticism from many of her constituents over her personal ethics, as well as her long history of anti-American and anti-Semitic comments, she will likely encounter formidable challenges in both the Democratic primary and general election this year.

Omar’s prior attacks on U.S. policy last year prompted President Donald Trump to say at a North Carolina rally last year that she was more than welcome to go back to her native country. However, given widely reported instances of her committing adultery, she would likely be stoned to death under Sharia law if she were to do so.

Sitting alongside Omar on Friday was fellow “Squad” member Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., a first-generation American whose parents hailed from the Palestinian territories.

While Palestinian terror groups like Hezbollah and Hamas, which are financially backed by Iran, routinely use violence—including firing rockets across the border into Israel—as a first resort in their apparent negotiation tactics, Omar did not appear to be addressing Tlaib when criticizing the violence that devastates families abroad.

Rather, she claimed, falsely, that the U.S. was manufacturing the weapons that enabled it.

Omar said she planned to begin a conversation on “what human-rights conditionalities could mean as we think about the people who are using the weapons created in this country [the United States] to take the lives of innocent children and women and men abroad.”

She blamed not only U.S. weapons and military operations, but also the economic sanctions it has imposed on hostile nations over their anti-American policies, causing people in those countries to suffer under their oppressive regimes, Omar complained.

“It is important for us to have these connections between what sanctions could mean for the destruction of lives abroad,” she said.

Even if Trump were to withdraw most military forces from the Middle East—as he has previously sought to do, much to the criticism of his left-wing opponents—that still would not placate Omar, unless there are open-borders and wealth-redistribution policies attached to offset the sins of Western opulence that allegedly have resulted in global warming.

Although much of the Middle East is arid, desert terrain, Omar complained that flooding—caused exclusively by America’s failure to address climate change—was at fault in driving refugees from their homes.

“When you see a flooding happening in a country abroad and you are urgently raising money for these lives to be saved, you don’t think about ‘How have I contributed to the climate warming that has led to these floodings and these catastrophes that are taking place abroad?'” she told the Howard University audience.

New York to Sue Federal Gov't after Residents Banned from 'Trusted Traveler' Programs

‘We will not allow New Yorkers to be targeted or bullied by an authoritarian thug…’

High-Tax Blue States LOSE Lawsuit Over GOP Federal Tax Reform
Andrew Cuomo/Photo by zrs_one (CC)

(Joshua Paladino, Liberty Headlines) A day after the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that it would block New York residents from “trusted traveler” programs due to the state’s “Green Light” law, Gov. Andrew Cuomo said the state would sue.
“Time and time again President Trump and his Washington enablers have gone out of their way to hurt New York and other blue states whenever they can as punishment for refusing to fall in line with their dangerous and divisive agenda,” Cuomo said, according to a press release.
New York’s Green Light law, which took effect in December, prohibits federal agencies—including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)—from accessing the state’s department of motor vehicle records.
Since New York refuses to cooperate with the federal government, the state’s travelers will not have access to programs such as Global Entry, SENTRI, NEXUS, FAST, and TSA pre-check.
New York Attorney General Letitia James plans to argue in the lawsuit that DHS’s decision invades the state’s sovereign immunity, revokes equal protections from the state’s residents, and neglects the “rights and privileges of all New Yorkers,” according to the press release.
“This is political retribution, plain and simple, and while the president may want to punish New York for standing up to his xenophobic policies, we will not back down,” James said. “This new policy will negatively impact travelers, workers, commerce, and our economy, so we will fight the president’s shortsighted crusade against his former home. We will not allow New Yorkers to be targeted or bullied by an authoritarian thug.”
The lawsuit will further claim that the Trump administration has arbitrarily targeted New York state, since thirteen other states and the District of Columbia also have Green Light laws.
“The Department of Homeland Security’s decision to ban New Yorkers from the Trusted Traveler Program is yet another example of this administration’s disrespect of the rule of law, hyper-partisan politics and use of extortion,” Cuomo said. “There is no rational basis for this politically motivated ban, and we are taking legal action to stop the federal government from inconveniencing New Yorkers to score political points.”