Squad Congresswoman Will Only Identify Trump as ‘Occupant’

0

‘He does not honor the integrity or the responsibility or the empathy or the compassion, and so, for that reason I call him “The Occupant”…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Of the four members of “The Squad”—the radical freshman congresswomen backed by the Justice Democrats PAC—Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., may be considered the “Fredo.”

Her vaunted seat in a Boston district once held by current Sen. Ed Markey, with a background that included working for Rep. Joseph Kennedy II (RFK’s son) and Sen. John Kerry, puts Pressley firmly within the ranks of the establishment, in contrast to the populist outsider appeal of Reps. Alexandria Ocasio–Cortez, D-NY; Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich.; and Ilhan Omar, D-Minn.

But in an appearance Tuesday on the “Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” Pressley sought to rehab her reputation as the forgotten and neglected member of the sorority.

Refusing to acknowledge President Donald Trump by name, instead calling him “The Occupant,” Pressley proved during her appearance that she can be just as bombastic as her socialism-spouting colleagues.

“He is just occupying space,” she told Colbert. ” … I mean, we went from a president who sang ‘Amazing Grace’ to one who displays zero of it.”

But she insisted she wasn’t being petty since the president was entirely to blame for incurring Democrats’ wrath.

“He does not honor the integrity or the responsibility or the empathy or the compassion,” Pressley said, “and so, for that reason I call him ‘The Occupant’—not because I dishonor the office but because he does.”

Despite her best efforts, Pressley seemed to lack the passion, charm and charisma that her Squad colleagues rely on to convey their radical messaging, instead rattling off the same outlandish claims and rhetoric as if reciting from a script.

Much of it relied on race-baiting, with Pressley invoking her “privileged” status as a woman of color, according to her own acknowledgement.

She claimed solidarity with her constituents—40 percent of whom she said were immigrants—because she also felt marginalized by American culture and society.

“As a black woman, I know what it is to show up in the world and to be criminalized simply for how you show up in the world,” Pressley said.

Falling back on a tired trope about a child separation policy that the Trump administration implemented for roughly a week in June 2018 to address loopholes in the asylum laws, Pressley said the enforcement of immigration laws called to mind the past wrongs of slavery and the exploitation of American Indians.

“Right now, the system is doing what it was designed to do—and that is to separate families and to decimate communities,” she said.

“And we’ve been here before,” she continued. “We were here at the auction blocks during slavery, we were here with indigenous people on reservations—we know that it is a very effective tool of oppression to separate families, and in particular to take a child from the arms of a mother.”

Pressley did show a small measure of charisma when Colbert asked if she were among the House Democrats who supported impeaching the president.

“Absolutely,” she replied chipperly—before falling back on a more serious tone.

“I didn’t go to Congress to impeach a president,” she continued. “This is something that you enter into with, uh, great—I mean, really sober about.”

To date, no evidence has been presented against Trump that would fit the standard outlined in the Constitution for impeachment.

While many in Democratic leadership fear the political repercussions of moving forward without a solid case—which would invariably fail to result in Trump’s removal—more than half of House Democrats still support the partisan maneuver.

“This is bigger than Donald Trump,” Pressley said. “I know that, you know, they like to say that this is a partisan witch hunt, but this is bigger than him—this is about the office of the presidency.”

Pressley appeared to suggest that the lack of solid evidence was the very reason why haste was so important for her and her constituents, who regarded impeachment as a condemnation of his policies more than anything.

“For anyone who says we can wait, they’re not experiencing the real fear and fragility that people are living with every day,” she said.

Montage of Trump ‘Unity’ Calls DESTROYS Fake News’s Racism Claims

0

‘The Left-wing media are the unindicted conspirators of America’s anti-Semites, white nationalists, and other odious racists…’

VIDEO: Montage of Trump 'Unity' Calls DESTROYS Fake News's 'White Supremacy' Claims
At a “United Against Racism and Facism” march in New York, socialist party members carrying signs that promote the true agenda of the protest / IMAGE: News2Share

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) With the arrival of the quadrennial campaign season, as sure as Leap Years and Olympic fever, Americans can count on the Left to revert back to its shrill and specious race-baiting attacks.

This has been Democrats’ modus operandi for decades—and yet, with each election cycle, they hope a new generation of naive 20somethings will bite after conveying to the populous a sense of panic and urgency to oust the status quo.

In doing so, one must cast aside rational common sense and elect radicals whose cynical proposals pander to voters’ basest instincts and to the lowest common denominators of society: open borders, court-packing, slavery reparations, socialist wealth distribution and an all-encompassing nanny state to protect people against themselves.

President Donald Trump has only fueled the Left’s fervor by refusing to capitulate to the forces of political correctness, breaking with the stuffy decorum of past conservative thought-leaders by pushing back in equal measure to the extreme rhetoric.

The frenzied effort by The New York Times last week to revise an objectively written headline—after leftists objected to it—on Trump’s response to recent mass shootings pulled back, for a brief moment, the veneer behind which their entire house of cards is built.

By failing to filter or “contextualize” the president’s remarks through the prism of progressivist spin, the rare moment of candor—reporting on what was said rather than what was interpreted by the opposition—portrayed a leader who had the potential to unify and heal in the wake of senseless violence.

But as conservative columnist Deroy Murdock noted in a column last week, such has been the case all along.

“[W]hen journalists almost unanimously bury President Trump’s repeated pleas to undermine racists and unite the country, fear and loathing thrive,” noted Murdock, who is black.

“Thus, the Left-wing media are the unindicted conspirators of America’s anti-Semites, white nationalists, and other odious racists,” he said.

Accompanying Murdock’s column, Grabien included the following montage of moments when Trump’s words have run counter to the Left’s fraudulent “white supremacist” narrative.

Trump Continues to Mock Chris Cuomo Meltdown

0

‘When a Conservative does even a fraction of what Chris Cuomo did with his lunatic ranting, raving, & cursing, they get destroyed by the Fake News…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) President Donald Trump took to Twitter on Tuesday to savagely roast CNN anchor Chris Cuomo for a profanity-laced tirade that threatened violence against a stranger who called him “Fredo.”

Cuomo claimed that the jeer was an anti-Italian slur that was as offensive as the “n-word” would be to African Americans. He threatened to push the heckler down a flight of stairs before his handlers intervened.

Both on his personal account and his “Team Trump” campaign account, in a series of posts throughout the day Trump encouraged followers to use the #FredoCuomo hashtag.

One post included a scene from “The Godfather” with Cuomo’s head superimposed over that of Fredo Corleone, the neglected middle brother of the Mafia dynasty.

Cuomo’s older brother, Andrew, the governor of New York, has routinely been a thorn in Trump’s side.

Although as a CNN host Cuomo typically comes off as a voice of rationality when juxtaposed with the likes of Jim Acosta, Don Lemon, Brian Stelter and other extremists on the network, the potential to rile the elder Cuomo brother by ruffling his sibling likely seemed an enticing prospect.

It wasn’t the first time Trump had tweeted a video to lightly rib the adversarial, left-leaning network, which he frequently characterizes as “fake news.”

In July 2017, Trump scandalized the mainstream media by tweeting an old video of him closelining WWE chairman Vince McMahon during a Wrestlemania event with the CNN logo superimposed on McMahon’s head.

Many in the press huffed that Trump’s humorous .gif meme was encouraging violence against journalists.

Trump Campaign Manager Brad Parscale was also quick to capitalize on the Fredo affair, promoting a T-shirt of the agitated Cuomo.

CNN stood behind Cuomo following the episode, claiming his reaction was one of self-defense.

Fox News anchor Sean Hannity, often a close ally of Trump’s, also offered words of encouragement and solidarity on Twitter.

Hannity, himself, has previously been subject to similar public harassment by leftist radicals.

However, Trump voiced his frustration at the perceived double-standard.

Radical Dems Threaten SCOTUS: ‘Heal’ Itself or Face Restructuring

‘The Supreme Court is not well. And the people know it…’

Liberal Sens. Hirono and Gillibrand Give Platform to Kavanaugh Accusers After Saying Men Should 'Shut Up'
Sens. Kristen Gillibrand and Mazie Hirono/IMAGE: screenshot via CSPAN

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Some of the most extremist Democrats in the Senate penned a menacing missive to the Supreme Court on Monday demanding that the judiciary take measures to fix itself while voicing disdain for its slight conservative majority.

The attack on the court came in the form of a brief filed on behalf of a case involving a New York City gun law, reported Fox News.

“The Supreme Court is not well. And the people know it,” the brief claimed without evidence. “Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands it be ‘restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics.'”

Left-wing radicals such as former Attorney General Eric Holder, already have floated the possibility of packing the court with liberal justices should they ever regain power.

At least five of the current Democratic primary candidates have expressed support for the proposal, while at least two others support rotating the justices, who currently have lifetime appointments as outlined in the Constitution.

The current nine-justice configuration has been in place for 150 years.

Although Democrats feared that the addition of two Trump appointees—despite their replacing fellow conservative justices—may upset the court’s tenuous balance, justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh by many accounts proved to be surprisingly centrist.

Gorsuch, known to be more libertarian, sided with the court’s liberal arm on some crucial decisions related to criminal justice.

Kavanaugh, who faced immense opposition from far-left activists over unproven accusations of a high-school sexual assault, took pains to assuage their anger, voting with the liberals to turn down a potentially landmark abortion case.

Kavanaugh also drew plaudits from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg for hiring an all-female staff of law clerks.

Ginsburg, a progressive icon, said she opposed the idea of court-packing in a July interview with NPR. “Nine seems to be a good number,” she said.

As with other Democratic efforts to undermine established rules of order, any attempt by the Left to pack the courts could set a dangerous precedent and eventually backfire against them.

But even so, the Senate Democrats Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Mazie Hirono of Hawaii and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island cited a May survey from left-skewed Quinnipiac University that claimed 51 percent of respondents were in favor of court-packing.

MR. SULU: Illegal Aliens Subjected to ‘Intentional Cruelty’

0

‘What we have on the southern borders now is a grotesque, new low…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Best known for playing the chief navigation officer aboard the U.S.S. Enterprise, “Star Trek” actor George Takei was all over the map Monday during an appearance on “Late Night with Seth Meyers,” displaying his less-than-stellar understanding of the issues surrounding real-life aliens.

Takei’s iconic turn as Mr. Sulu lasted only a handful of seasons before the sci-fi show was canceled 50 years ago, but after a half-century of milking the role, the actor recently has enjoyed a resurgence on Twitter for his far-left political commentary.

Surprisingly, Takei had harsh words for the policies of Democrats past and present who were responsible both for the World War II-era Japanese internment camps in the U.S., and the current overcrowding of detention centers in the ongoing illegal immigration crisis.

Spinning off the outlandish rhetoric of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio–Cortez, D-NY, and other far-left Democrats, Takei referred to the detainment of Japanese–Americans during the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration as American “concentration camps.”

In the current border crisis, Ocasio–Cortez has drawn criticism for implying that the conditions in detention facilities are comparable to the Nazi death centers—where brutal treatment, cruel scientific experiments, starvation and rampant disease were as apt to kill the imprisoned Jews and other victims as were the notorious gas chambers.

Takei—who, at the age of 5, following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, was himself taken to one of the U.S. internment camps with his family—admitted in the interview that he generally had fond memories of it.

After being on the set of a new series that dramatized the experience of those within the camps, Takei said he felt a certain sentimentality.

“It was, to me, a kind of nostalgic return because of my childhood experience,” he said. “But as a teenager, I learned a lot more about the reality—the harrowing experience that it was for my parents.”

Takei dialed up the rhetoric even farther by saying that the current detention of illegal immigrants at the Mexican border was worse than the wartime measures taken during the 1940s.

He repeated several statements about the detention centers that are widely disputed by U.S. immigration authorities, including unsourced claims about the conditions and a long-expired leftist talking point about the short-lived child-separation policy.

“What we have on the southern borders now is a grotesque, new low,” Takei said. “Children being torn away from their parents. Infants torn away, put in filthy, disgusting cages with human waste… And to really underscore the evil in this, some of them are scattered to the far reaches of the United States from the southern border… intentional cruelty.”

The overcrowding of the centers, lack of resources and the need to move some of the illegal immigrants farther inland are, of course, the direct result of Congressional Democrats’ refusal to cooperate in addressing the issue.

The Left long denied any sort of crisis, and only came around to acknowledging it after the centers already had reached critical mass.

Ocasio–Cortez, despite claiming Holocaust-like conditions in the facilities, has refused even to vote for emergency funding to alleviate the immigrants’ situation.

Yet, left-wing activists continue to encourage migrants from Central-American, African and Middle-Eastern countries to cross the border illegally and then claim asylum to avert deportation proceedings.

For those able to game the system, “sanctuary states” like New York and California have promised incentives such as free (taxpayer-subsidized) healthcare and college tuition.

Activist liberal judges, meanwhile, have sought to block many of the Trump administration’s efforts to address the border crisis through executive action, such as a policy requiring asylum-seekers to remain in Mexico during the legal process.

Ignoring the Left’s culpability, Takei also invoked the brief 2018 child-separation policy, implemented by the Trump administration as a solution to longstanding “catch-and-release” loopholes that allow “families” of illegals to be let go after no more than 20 days of detention.

The result is believed to have been an uptick in child-trafficking and kidnapping as childless adults attempting to gain access to the U.S. falsely claim to be the underage victims’ parents.

Trump’s “zero-tolerance” policy, which the White House said predated the current administration, lasted roughly a week in June of last year before a judge ordered the families reunited.

Last month, a government-commissioned study found that 95 percent of the 1619 separated children had been reunited with their guardians, and an additional 4 percent had been released after aging out of the system or choosing to return home to their native country.

But it seemed Takei didn’t get the memo.

“When the courts ordered them to bring the children and the parents together, they are so incompetent that they can’t find the right child or the parents to put them together,” he ranted to Meyers. “… It is an American tragedy and an American disgrace.”

Millionaire Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Found Dead

0

Body was discovered unresponsive in Manhattan jail cell at 7:30 a.m. on Saturday…

Jeffrey Epstein / PHOTO: mugshot via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Word broke on Saturday morning that convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein, 66, was dead.

Epstein was discovered around 7:30 a.m. Saturday after apparently hanging himself in his New York jail cell while facing new charges for allegedly sex-trafficking minors to the rich and powerful, according to The Daily Mail.

The news came a day after a major release of documents outed some of his famous clients according to one of the victims, who claimed she had been sent to visit former Gov. Bill Richardson, D-NM; former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell, D-Maine; and Great Britain’s Prince Andrew—once third in line for the throne.

The accuser also named Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, although the famous liberal lawyer pointed to an email among the court documents that seemed to be exculpatory.

The other prominent accused men also denied encounters with the victim and said they were unaware that Epstein, with whom they associated, might be involved in his illegal activity.

The two most noteworthy of Epstein’s associates—former President Bill Clinton and current President Donald Trump—were not among those implicated in the recent release.

However, the speculation over what Epstein himself might reveal in testimony led many to wonder, following a previous prison suicide attempt, if the billionaire investor might be the target of a hit.

The scandal-prone Clinton, who flew on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” airplane more than two dozen times—and is believed to have visited his Florida mansion and private island retreat—has been linked in the past to a number of suspicious deaths, with many online sites documenting the names.

In addition to Trump’s having been a personal acquaintance who attended some of Epstein’s parties, his former Labor secretary, Alex Acosta, became enmeshed in the Epstein scandal after attorneys in New York announced their federal charges and arrested the disgraced financier.

Acosta had been a U.S. attorney in Florida when the state brought charges against him in 2006. Fearing that the case might not result in jail time, Acosta offered a plea deal to Epstein that would assure a conviction and restitution for victims while agreeing not to bring federal charges.

Epstein ultimately was given just over a year in prison on those sex-trafficking charges, much of which he was allowed to serve from his home while conducting business.

Acosta resigned earlier this year as many in the media began to scrutinize and criticize his decision.

TRUMP: Kaepernick Should Be Signed, but Only ‘If He’s Good Enough’

‘I don’t want to see him come in because somebody thinks it’s a good PR move…’

NFL Players Coalition Uses $90 Million Anti-Kneeling Settlement to Fund Left-Wing Politically Activity
Eli Harold and Colin Kaepernick / IMAGE: NFL Network via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) President Donald Trump weighed in on the prospects of former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick returning to the NFL, saying the anthem-protesting player’s politics should not preclude him from playing.

However, he added, Kaepernick should not be allowed to play simply because of his politics either.

He should be given the opportunity only “if he’s good enough,” the president said, according to ESPN.

“I know [Patriots owner] Bob Kraft, I know so many of the owners, if he’s good enough, they’d sign him … in a heartbeat,” Trump said. “They will do anything they can to win games.”

The Patriots just added a two-year, $70 million contract extension to longtime quarterback Tom Brady, who turned 42 last week. After becoming the oldest quarterback ever to win a Super Bowl last year, he shows no signs of slowing down or moving aside for a replacement.

Kaepernick, 31, has not played in the NFL since opting out of his contract after the 2016 season, when he was benched due to his poor performance.

Several teams passed on him as a free agent, which led Kaepernick and fellow anthem-kneeler Eric Reid to sue the league, claiming discrimination. The NFL settled the suit for an undisclosed amount, with the Wall Street Journal reporting it to be less than $10 million.

Reid is now a safety for the Carolina Panthers and has said he plans to continue the kneeling protest this season.

In the meantime, Kaepernick has managed to cash in on his notoriety. A controversial marketing deal with Nike prompted widespread backlash and boycott threats from many conservatives, but ultimately boosted the apparel company’s sales among its target demographic.

The sway that the outspoken race-baiter has over the brand became evident again when, prior to the Independence Day holiday, Nike pulled a design that featured the original “Betsy Ross” flag of the 13 colonies, saying that Kaepernick had deemed it to be “racist” due to the connotations with slavery.

On Wednesday, Kaepernick posted a workout video to his social media accounts complaining that he had been “denied work” for 889 days and saying he was “still ready.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by colin kaepernick (@kaepernick7) on

Trump, who has been openly critical of the kneeling, even encouraging an NFL boycott during the 2017 season, responded to a question from reporters about it during a meeting outside the White House.

“Frankly, I’d love to see Kaepernick come in, if he’s good enough. But I don’t want to see him come in because somebody thinks it’s a good PR move. If he’s good enough, he will be in.”

Anti-Gun Leftists Create Rash of Public Scares After Dayton, El Paso Shootings

‘He did confirm he is anti-gun, and that he is trying to further this platform…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) A left-wing activist with ties to the pro-LGBT Human Rights Campaign created a stir Thursday in a Florida Walmart by asking a clerk for “anything that would kill 200 people.”

CBSMiami reported that Phil Attey claimed he was simply trying to speak his mind.

“I’m in a Walmart a few days after El Paso and I’m seeing a white nationalist looking guy purchase a gun and I got mad,” Attey said.

WPTV News also was able to interview Attey on camera Thursday.

Attey was not charged for creating the public panic since it was deemed not to be a danger.

“They have made contact with him at his residence, they have determined him not to be a credible threat to anybody,” Port St. Lucie Assistant Police Chief Richard Del Toro said a press conference, according to CBS12.

“He did confirm he is anti-gun, and that he is trying to further this platform,” Del Toro said.

Shockingly, several national media sources including Good Morning America and the Huffington Post used misleading headlines and buried the fact that Attey was an anti-gun activist deep in their reporting.

Some later used stealth editing to amend the pieces once word got out on the fake news.

Since the two mass shootings last weekend in El Paso and Dayton, anti-gun activists—with the help of complicit left-wing media—are now using any means necessary to distort the gun-control narrative, including creating a public panic.

On Wednesday, a Walmart in Washington state went into lockdown from an apparent gun threat with what was later proven to be a BB gun.

After store officials threatened to call police, the man reportedly said “Go ahead,” according to KOMO News.

During the evacuation of the store, however, the suspect disappeared, and police have yet to locate him.

Several other Walmart stores have seen a spate of fake reports, including a bomb threat in Roanoke, Texas, and another false alarm in Gibsonton, Florida, where the perpetrator said he was “intrigued” by the earlier shootings.

Meanwhile, few mainstream news outlets have acknowledged that the Dayton killer expressed far-left views on his since-removed Twitter account that included endorsements of Satanism and the presidential campaign of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.

Many continue to report that the motives were “unclear” for the deceased 24-year-old gunman with a history of mental derangement.

A spokesperson for Warren’s campaign said that the reporting on his leftist political views was simply a distraction.

However, previous tweets indicated that he also held anti-gun views, thus suggesting that in the wake of the El Paso shooting he may have seen himself as a martyr to the cause.

Media who initially claimed that the mass shooters at California’s Gilroy Garlic Festival and the El Paso Walmart were members of the far-right also have continued to suppress the fact that those assailants endorsed left-wing causes as well.

And the press largely ignored the fact that an assailant in a mass-stabbing rampage in Orange County, California, was a gang member and possibly an illegal immigrant.

While neglecting to disclose all the facts in these episodes, the media have helped propel the left’s agenda, dutifully reporting on pressure campaigns such as a planned Walmart employee walkout and an online petition to force the big-box store to discontinue its sales of firearms.

ANOTHER Disgraced FBI Spook Sues for Wrongful Termination

0

‘Defendants responded to plaintiff’s two decades of unblemished and non-partisan public service with a politically motivated and retaliatory demotion…’

FBI's McCabe 'Used FBI Resources' for His Democrat Wife's Campaign
Andrew McCabe/Photo by U.S. Embassy New Delhi (CC)

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe—one of the chief architects of the discredited Russia collusion investigation—has filed suit saying he was unfairly fired last year.

McCabe oversaw FBI efforts to spy on the campaign of President Donald Trump and throw the election for his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton. He was ultimately dismissed in March 2018 for inappropriately leaking classified information to the media.

McCabe sued the Justice Department and Attorney General William Barr, claiming his termination last year—for failing to disclose conversations with a reporter about pending investigations—was illegal, reported Bloomberg News.

Also named in the suit were the FBI and its director, Christopher Wray.

A day prior, former FBI counterintelligence head Peter Strzok filed a separate lawsuit for the same reasons, although he and McCabe are not represented by the same law firms, Bloomberg reported.

Both men are believed to be prime subjects in two ongoing investigations being led by the Justice Department—one by Inspector General Michael Horowitz and another by special prosecutor John Durham.

Former FBI Director James Comey is also believed to be facing severe scrutiny from the probes for his role in the alleged partisan collusion.

Jeff Sessions, Barr’s predecessor as attorney general, fired McCabe on the eve of his retirement at the behest of President Donald Trump, who issued multiple tweets criticizing McCabe—who became acting director after Comey’s firing 10 months prior.

Trump celebrated McCabe’s firing—and the denial of his retirement pension—in a March 17 tweet.

However, in his complaint filed Thursday, McCabe asked a federal judge to declare that he retired as an agent in good standing, making him eligible for his pension and benefits.

McCabe highlighted his 21 years of service in the 48-page filing.

That service was undercut by the decision—which some, including Trump, have called a seditious coup—to initiate a probe of Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign—including the now debunked allegations that he coordinated with the Kremlin.

Much of that information was revealed to have come directly from the Hillary Clinton campaign and its contractor Fusion GPS, who used the husband–wife duo of Bruce and Nellie Ohr to funnel the contents of the now-debunked Steele Dossier directly into McCabe’s hands.

Despite being aware of the concerns surrounding the source, British spy Christopher Steele, and his ties to the Kremlin, McCabe and others nonetheless used the phony allegations as the basis for FISA warrant applications to spy on members of the Trump campaign.

Further complicating matters was the fact that, in her bid for the Virginia state Senate, McCabe’s wife, Jill, had accepted nearly half a million dollars in contributions from Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe—a former Clinton campaign bundler and business partner of Hillary Clinton’s brother—even as Andrew McCabe was supposed to be overseeing an investigation into Clinton.

In claiming he was entitled to his pension and benefits, McCabe (who subsequently published a book attacking Trump) continued to deny any wrongdoing on his part.

“Defendants responded to plaintiff’s two decades of unblemished and non-partisan public service with a politically motivated and retaliatory demotion in January 2018 and public firing in March 2018—on the very night of plaintiff’s long-planned retirement from the FBI,” said the court filing.

Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec declined to comment to Bloomberg on the case.

STUDY: No Indications that Russian Interference Impacted 2016 Outcome

‘The results were almost totally predictable based on the political and demographic characteristics of those states…’

Big turnout as America votes in test of Trump presidency 2
PHOTO: Ben Sellers/Liberty Headlines

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) A newly released analysis from the University of Virginia‘s Center for Politics revealed that—contrary to what failed candidate Hillary Clinton and many others have claimed—any alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election did not have a significant impact.

The study’s author, Alan I. Abramowitz, a senior columnist for Larry Sabato’s Crystal Ball election prognosticator project, used a series of regression analyses to compare President Donald Trump’s support with that of GOP candidate Mitt Romney in the 2012 election.

Abramowitz found a close correlation in the two races based on factors including each state’s political tendencies, the number of rallies the candidates held, voter demographics and economic conditions.

“I find no evidence that Russian attempts to target voters in key swing states had any effect on the election results in those states. Instead, the results were almost totally predictable based on the political and demographic characteristics of those states,” said Abramowitz, who is also a political science professor at Emory University.

“Of course, that doesn’t mean that the Russians weren’t trying to influence the results or that they might not succeed in the future,” he added.

Regardless, the findings further erode one of the key precepts on which the two-year Mueller investigation, the FBI investigation that preceded it and the ongoing probes by partisan House Democrats were based.

Many on the Right have observed that, in fact, there appears to have been considerable collusion by the Obama administration’s intelligence apparatus, the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign to use the canard of Russian election interference—first to spy on the Trump campaign, and later to erode confidence in the election and undermine Trump’s presidency.

STUDY: No Indications that Russian Interference Impacted 2016 Outcome
Reps. Al Green and Rashida Tlaib lead a rally in support of impeaching President Trump. / IMAGE: NBC News via Youtube

Some have questioned whether special counsel Robert Mueller was aware of the lack of collusion prior to the 2018 midterm election in which Democrats used his investigation under false pretenses as a political bludgeon to retake the House of Representatives.

Still, other aspersions have arisen as to the scope and severity of Russian interference, which appears to have been based around using bots to spread misinformation on social media and hacking into some of the Democrats’ many unsecured email servers.

Not content to let the data speak for itself, Abramowitz—who, along with his wife, Ann, has given considerable amounts to Democratic candidates and causes over the years—found a way of spinning the lack of Russian influence on the election into a pitch for the far-left national popular vote movement.

“Indeed, the Electoral College system used to choose the president almost invites efforts to interfere in the election,” Abramowitz opined.

“Whereas trying to affect the national popular vote results would probably be prohibitively expensive, efforts to target a few key swing states could be much more cost-effective and harder to detect,” he added.

Abramowitz’s claim neglected to mention that the prime argument against such an effort is that it would enable heavily populated blue states like California, with lax election laws and enforcement procedures that leave the door wide open for potential fraud by non-citizens, to then sway the outcome of other states with tighter ballot-box security, forcibly disfranchising their voters.

Tipping his hand yet again to snipe at President Donald Trump, Abramowitz declared, this time with no supporting evidence, “[T]here is little doubt that these efforts will continue in 2020 and beyond, especially if we have a president who seems to be inviting them.”