Susan Rice Gaining Ground in Biden’s Veepstakes

Former national security adviser Susan Rice is on track to become one of presidential candidate Joe Biden’s top vice presidential choices, according to The Hill.

Despite her liabilities—such as a deep involvement in the Benghazi and Obamagate scandals that have been largely ignored by the mainstream press—the Biden campaign has leaned on Rice’s political experience during recent events, including the coronavirus pandemic and ongoing protests over the death of George Floyd.

Rice’s experience in the Obama administration is also appealing, said sources familiar with Biden’s upcoming decision.

“I know they have a good relationship—perhaps the best relationship of anyone on the list,” a source close to the Biden campaign said.

“They’ve known each other for years,” said the source. “They’ve worked alongside each other, and she’s been tested in a way that a lot of folks on the list just haven’t been.”

Biden said he wants someone who is “ready to be president on day one,” and as a fellow holdover of the Obama presidency, Rice fits that description, according to sources.

Biden has also said he’d like to choose a woman of color, and his campaign is under even more pressure to choose a black woman as racial tensions continue to dominate the news cycle.

“Everyone automatically thinks of [Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif.] when they think he needs to pick a woman of color. It’s become conventional wisdom,” said a source who worked in the Obama administration alongside Biden and Rice.

“But if you look at Susan’s credentials, she makes perfect sense,” the source continued. “She’s a rock star who has the confidence, stature and gravitas to be vice president.”

However, Rice’s involvement with the Obamagate scandal—and her past record of dishonesty—may compound some of the problems Biden himself faces in the months to come. A far-reaching criminal investigation by Justice Department special prosecutor John Durham is set to wrap within the coming weeks.

Recent documents reveal that Rice lied during a 2018 congressional probe to cover the trail of cronies like former FBI Director James Comey and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

It also was revealed recently that Obama and Biden were much more involved in the FBI’s attempts to undermine the Trump administration than originally suggested. Handwritten notes by FBI agent Peter Strzok indicated that it was likely Biden who suggested trying to frame Rice’s successor, incoming national security adviser Michael Flynn, during a Jan. 5, 2017 meeting, at which Rice was also present.

In a subsequent memo, she claimed that Obama had insisted the FBI conduct everything “by the book” and that “the right people” take charge of the Flynn probe, which had nearly been dismissed after FBI analysts determined his conversations with a Russian diplomat had not posed a security threat.

Nonetheless, the information of the calls was secretly leaked to media, who used it to force out Flynn, who was later indicted as part of a perjury trap by the same FBI agents. That chain of events also led to President Donald Trump’s firing of Comey, which led Congress to appoint special counsel Robert Mueller.

Harris, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., are also reportedly towards the top of Biden’s VP list.

KAEPERNICK: Independence Day is a ‘Celebration of White Supremacy’

Failed NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick slammed the Fourth of July as a “celebration of white supremacy” this weekend, but had no problem celebrating the holiday when Barack Obama was president.

Independence Day is a sham, Kaepernick claimed on Saturday, arguing that the U.S.’s “commemoration of ‘independence’” ignores America’s original sin: slavery.

Just a few years ago, however, Kaepernick had a much different message for Americans:

Critics were quick to point out this sudden change in tune:

This isn’t the only American holiday Kaepernick has insulted. Last year, he referred to Thanksgiving Day as “Unthanksgiving Day,” and accused the U.S. of stealing from and killing Native Americans.

“The US government has stolen over 1.5 billion acres of land from Indigenous people. Thank you to my Indigenous family, I’m with you today and always,” Kaepernick said.

He also claimed that the killing of Iranian terrorist Qassem Soleimani, who murdered hundreds of American soldiers, was just another racist “terrorist attack” the U.S. has committed against people of color.

Kaepernick, who is mixed-race biologically, grew up under the care of affluent, adoptive white parents in suburban California.

“There is nothing new about American terrorist attacks against Black and Brown people for the expansion of American imperialism,” Kaepernick said.

“America has always sanctioned and besieged Black and Brown bodies both at home and abroad. America militarism is the weapon wielded by American imperialism, to enforce its policing and plundering of the non white world.”

BLM Protests Turn Anti-Semitic as Protesters Chant ‘Israel Kills Children!’

Black Lives Matter protesters led an anti-Zionist march in support of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement this week, claiming that opposition to Israel is “intrinsically” connected to BLM.

The march, led by Harvard University student Christian Tabash, featured signs in support of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, a group with connections to radical terrorists, and the nearly 200 BLM activists who attended used the march as an opportunity to blast Israel’s territorial claims in the West Bank.

“Israel, we know you, you murder children, too,” the crowd chanted at one point, according to the Washington Examiner.

The crowd then chanted “Palestinian lives matter!” followed by “Black lives matter!” Others shouted criticisms of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. And most protesters began chanting, “Israel kills children!”

At one point, Tabash read a poem titled “Mr. War” that described Israel as the “puppet master of continents.”

“Curse thee, the corrupters of Zion. F— this occupation!” Tabash said.

The protesters also used the march as an opportunity to blast “American capitalism” and demand the elimination of law enforcement.

“And that’s why we say police from Palestine to Mexico to the United States—police as a whole—need to go!” Tabash shouted.

The National Council of Young Israel called on Democratic and African American government officials to condemn the “sickening” protest.

“Whether it is yelling antisemitic comments during a march in our nation’s capital or vandalizing and defacing synagogues and Jewish-owned businesses in Los Angeles with antisemitic messages during a protest, these blatant expressions of bigotry are intolerable and must end,” said NCYI President Farley Weiss, according to the Jerusalem Post.

Weiss pointed out that BLM has “become intertwined with anti-Semitic tendencies,” citing an example from 2016 in which the BLM movement described Israel as an “apartheid state” in its platform.

“By poisoning protests with anti-Israel declarations and antisemitic remarks, some of the individuals who so desperately seek justice and an end to racism are themselves engaging in abhorrent and hypocritical behavior that fans the flames of bigotry and hate,” he said.

SCOTUS Ruling on ‘Faithless Electors’ May Aid Dems’ Bid to Eliminate Electoral College

0

(Liberty Headlines) Embittered by their belief—albeit disputed—that Hillary Clinton won the 2016 popular vote by roughly 2.8 million more total ballots, blue states have pushed recently to abolish the Electoral College, which serves as the last backstop between direct democracy and the presidency.

Several left-wing state legislatures have passed the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact saying they would force their electors to support the national popular-vote winner, regardless of how their own citizens may have voted.

Now, a unanimous Supreme Court verdict may have given that effort an extra boost as the states seek to exert added political pressure on the 538 representative delegates who must directly decide the presidency.

In a set of cases The court ruled Monday that states can require presidential electors to back their states’ popular vote winner in the Electoral College.

The issue arose in lawsuits filed by three Hillary Clinton electors in Washington state and one in Colorado who refused to vote for her despite her popular vote win in both states.

By so doing, they hoped to persuade enough electors in states won by Donald Trump to choose someone else and deny Trump the presidency.

But Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the court that a state may instruct “electors that they have no ground for reversing the vote of millions of its citizens. That direction accords with the Constitution—as well as with the trust of a Nation that here, We the People rule.”

The ruling was, undoubtedly, a win for the residents of the state in ensuring their votes counted, and that a handful of corrupt, rogue electors can’t undo the will of the people.

But it left unresolved the question of whether states might be allowed to enter into a compact to deny their own citizens’ choices in favor of a national vote-winner.

During a webinar last month hosted by the Committee for Justice, constitutional scholar John Malcolm, vice president of the Heritage Foundation’s Institute for Constitutional Government, said that it “could have a dramatic effect on the national popular vote” movement.

Malcolm noted that the framers of the founding documents had deliberately left room for interpretation in the authority it delegated to the electors tasked with sending one victor to the Oval Office.

“Article 2 of the Constitution gives states the power to appoint,” Malcolm said. But it does not specify how the electors must vote because the “framers did not intend for them to be merely a rubber stamp.”

That means the question as to whether the states, themselves, can be faithless to their own constituents remains yet unanswered.

Any sort of interstate compact, if it were to succeed in garnering the support of enough states, would be challenged as well.

Accountability for Electors

Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton/IMAGE: Bloomberg News via Youtube

The ruling’s indirect implications for the National Popular Vote were one of several concerns the decision sought to remedy in an increasingly divisive political climate where election integrity is paramount to counter the deep mistrust in political institutions.

The ruling, just under four months before the 2020 election, leaves in place laws in 32 states and the District of Columbia that bind electors to vote for the popular-vote winner, and electors almost always do so anyway.

So-called faithless electors have not been critical to the outcome of a presidential election, but that could change in a race decided by just a few electoral votes. It takes 270 electoral votes to win the presidency.

In asking the Supreme Court to rule that states can require electors to vote for the state winner, Colorado had urged the justices not to wait until “the heat of a close presidential election.”

The justices had scheduled arguments for the spring so they could resolve the issue before the election, rather than amid a potential political crisis after the country votes.

When the court heard arguments by telephone in May because of the coronavirus outbreak, justices invoked fears of bribery and chaos if electors could cast their ballots regardless of the popular vote outcome in their states.

The federal appeals court in Denver ruled that electors can vote as they please, rejecting arguments that they must choose the popular-vote winner. In Washington, the state Supreme Court upheld a $1,000 fine against the three electors and rejected their claims.

In all, there were 10 faithless electors in 2016, including a fourth in Washington, a Democratic elector in Hawaii and two Republican electors in Texas. In addition, Democratic electors who said they would not vote for Clinton were replaced in Maine and Minnesota.

The closest Electoral College margin in recent years was in 2000, when Republican George W. Bush received 271 votes to 266 for Democrat Al Gore. One elector from Washington, D.C., left her ballot blank.

The Supreme Court played a decisive role in that election, ending a recount in Florida, where Bush held a 537-vote margin out of 6 million ballots cast.

The justices scheduled separate arguments in the Washington and Colorado cases after Justice Sonia Sotomayor belatedly removed herself from the Colorado case because she knows one of the plaintiffs.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Ohio Town Declares Itself a ‘Sanctuary City’ For Historical Statues

‘Yes, they had warts but they laid the foundation for what we have today…’

(Claire Russel, Liberty Headlines) An Ohio town offered to take unwanted statues of historical figures from other cities this week, declaring itself a “statuary sanctuary city.”

In a proclamation last week, Newton Falls, Ohio declared “general amnesty” for statues of George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, Ulysses S. Grant, Patrick Henry, Francis Scott Key, Theodore Roosevelt and Christopher Columbus—statues that have each been targeted by radical activists across the country.

“The great leaders of our country and Western civilization, though flawed in many ways, have risen to great achievement such as the founding of our nation, the ending of slavery, establishment and protection of our national parks, the establishment of antitrust laws to protect our citizens from overaggressive monopolization of industry, and the discovery of the New World itself,” the proclamation reads, according to WFMJ-21, a local news outlet.

To pay respect to these figures, Newton Falls is “volunteering to accept these statues of these great leaders and volunteering to accept these statues that have been removed throughout the USA and place them in a location of honor in our community.”

The city’s manager, David Lynch, said Newton Falls wants to lead by example and encourage other Americans to “embrace the great leaders.”

“Yes, they had warts but they laid the foundation for what we have today,” he said.

Lynch’s argument is very different from much of the Left, which has argued that statues honoring the memory of historical figures are symbols of “oppression” and “racism.”

A statue of Abraham Lincoln on the University of Wisconsin’s campus, for example, was derided by a group of students who claimed Lincoln wasn’t “pro-Black.”

The school, however, defended the statue and the “totality” of Lincoln’s tenure.

“Like those of all presidents, Lincoln’s legacy is complex and contains actions which, 150 years later, appear flawed,” said the school’s chancellor, Becky Blank.

“However, when the totality of his tenure is considered, Lincoln is widely acknowledged as one of our greatest presidents, having issued the Emancipation Proclamation, persuaded Congress to adopt the 13th Amendment ending slavery and preserved the Union during the Civil War,” she added.

7-Year-Old Among 13 Killed & 59 Shot in Chicago Over 4th of July Weekend

‘As a city, we must wrap our arms around our youth…’

7-Year-Old Among 13 Killed & 59 Shot in Chicago Over 4th of July Weekend
AP Photo: Chicago police officers.

(Associated Press) At least 13 people, including a 7-year-old girl at a family party and a teenage boy, were killed in Chicago over the Fourth of July weekend, police said. At least 59 others were shot and wounded.

In one shooting, just before midnight Saturday, four males opened fire on a large gathering in the street in the Englewood neighborhood, police spokesman Tom Ahern said. Two males died at the scene and two more, including a 14-year-old boy, died at a hospital, Ahern said.

Four others were injured; one was in critical condition and the other three were in fair condition, Ahern said. The four attackers fled the scene. No one was arrested.

The 7-year-old girl was fatally shot in the head while standing on the sidewalk at her grandmother’s house during a Fourth of July party around 7 p.m. in the Austin neighborhood, police said.

Suspects got out of a car and began shooting, police said. No one has been arrested.

“Tonight, a 7-year-old girl in Austin joined a list of teenagers and children whose hopes and dreams were ended by the barrel of a gun,” Mayor Lori Lightfoot said on Twitter late Saturday.

The mayor added: “As a city, we must wrap our arms around our youth so they understand there’s a future for them that isn’t wrapped up in gun violence.”

A 32-year-old man was injured in the shooting and was in fair condition.

The Chicago Sun-Times, citing police, said that seven of those injured in shootings were minors.

The shootings this weekend that killed young people followed tragedy the weekend before when victims included a 1-year-old boy riding in a car with his mother and a 10-year-old girl who was inside her home when a bullet fired a block away pierced a window and struck her in the head as she sat on a couch

In response to violence that has occurred since Memorial Day weekend, police said they would have 1,200 extra officers on the streets for this holiday weekend.

Vandals Tear Down Rochester Statue of Freed Slave Frederick Douglass

‘The Constitution is a GLORIOUS LIBERTY DOCUMENT…’

 1
WROC-TV: A Frederick Douglass statue ripped from its base.

(Liberty Headlines) A statue of abolitionist Frederick Douglass was ripped from its base in Rochester on the anniversary of one of his most famous speeches, delivered in that city in 1852.

Police said the statue of Douglass was taken on Sunday from Maplewood Park, a site along the Underground Railroad where Douglas and Harriet Tubman helped shuttle slaves to freedom.

The statue was found at the brink of the Genesee River gorge about 50 feet from its pedestal, police said. There was damage to the base and a finger.

In Rochester on July 5, 1852, Douglass gave the speech “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July,” in which he called the celebration of liberty a sham in a nation that enslaves and oppresses its black citizens.

Yet Douglass spoke fondly of the Constitution.

“Fellow-citizens! there is no matter in respect to which, the people of the North have allowed themselves to be so ruinously imposed upon, as that of the pro-slavery character of the Constitution,” he said.

“In that instrument I hold there is neither warrant, license, nor sanction of the hateful thing; but, interpreted as it ought to be interpreted, the Constitution is a GLORIOUS LIBERTY DOCUMENT.”

Carvin Eison, a leader of the project that brought the Douglass statue to the park, told the Rochester Democrat & Chronicle another statue will take its place because the damage is too significant.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press.

Federal Student Aid Applications Down Almost 4% Since Last Cycle

It was sharpest at Title I schools…

(Liberty Headlines) The number of high school seniors applying for U.S. federal college aid plunged in the weeks following the sudden closure of school buildings this spring.

In the first weeks of the pandemic, the number of new applications fell by nearly half compared to last year’s levels, fueled by a precipitous decline among students at low-income schools, according to an Associated Press analysis of federal data.

The numbers have risen as states and schools have launched campaigns urging students to apply for aid, but they remain down overall from last year.

It’s raising alarms among education officials who say thousands of students may be opting to delay or forgo college.

The FAFSA, short for Free Application for Federal Student Aid, is required for students to be eligible for federal Pell grants and student loans. It’s also often a requirement for state aid.

In the four weeks starting March 13, the number of completed applications was down 45% compared to the same period the year before, according to the AP analysis.

It was sharpest at Title I schools, a federal designation for public schools that have larger shares of low-income students, which saw a 52% decrease, compared to a 39% slide at other public schools.

Overall, applications were down by 70,000 as of June 19, representing a 3.7% drop for the entire application cycle.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press.

Jeffrey Epstein’s Associate Ghislaine Maxwell to Appear in Court Friday

Prosecutors say the charges carry a potential penalty of up to 35 years in prison…

AP Photo: Audrey Strauss, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York.

(Associated Press) Prosecutors on Sunday asked a judge to schedule a Friday court appearance in New York for Jeffrey Epstein‘s longtime associate to face charges she helped him recruit women to sexually abuse.

British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, 58, was arrested Thursday at a $1 million estate on 156 acres that she purchased last December in Bradford, New Hampshire.

She has been detained without bail after agreeing to be moved to New York. Prosecutors have labeled her an “extreme risk of flight” and said they want her jailed until trial.

In a letter to a judge Sunday, prosecutors said they have communicated with Maxwell’s defense lawyer, Christian Everdell, who would like a Friday bail hearing after written arguments are submitted by both sides Thursday and Friday. She will also be arraigned at the hearing.

An email seeking comment was sent to Everdell.

She has previously repeatedly denied wrongdoing and called some claims against her “absolute rubbish.”

Prosecutors said they expect the U.S. Marshals Service to transport Maxwell to New York early this week.

Maxwell has been indicted on multiple charges, including that she conspired to entice girls as young as 14 to engage in illegal sex acts with Epstein from 1994 through 1997 at Epstein’s residences in New York City, Florida, and New Mexico and at Maxwell’s residence in London.

Prosecutors say the charges carry a potential penalty of up to 35 years in prison.

Epstein allegedly killed himself in a Manhattan jail last August while he awaited trial on federal sex trafficking charges.

Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss told a news conference Thursday that the investigation is continuing as the government seeks to hold anyone it finds aided Epstein accountable.

The arrest of Maxwell, a citizen of the U.S., France and the United Kingdom, came after she was described by some Epstein’s victims as his chief enabler, someone who recruited and groomed young girls for abuse.

Prosecutors say Maxwell had both a personal and professional relationship with Epstein.

Authorities said she sometimes hired girls to give him massages before joining as Epstein tried to engage the girls in sex acts.

Prosecutors last week outlined some arguments to keep Maxwell detained. They cited her wealth, saying she has had access to over $20 million in 15 bank accounts in recent years, along with her extensive international ties and the likelihood of a lengthy prison sentence if she is convicted.

Evidence in the case includes detailed corroborated information from multiple victims, along with documents including flight records, diary entries and business records, prosecutors said.

Since Epstein was arrested in July 2019, Maxwell had been in hiding in locations in New England, sometimes masking her location by changing her phone number and listing her name as “G Max,” prosecutors said.

Identity Politics Disaster: Systemic Racism v. Believe All Women in Cosby Case

‘We know how women can lie…’

AP Photo: Bill Cosby.

(Liberty Headlines) Bill Cosby, the Hollywood paragon of black family values, was convicted of sexual assault in 2018 as the #MeToo movement exploded and women across the globe shared personal histories of sexual harassment and abuse. He is serving up to 10 years in prison.

And now the 82-year-old Cosby has won the right to an appeal.

He hopes to use the moment to his advantage.

“The false conviction of Bill Cosby is so much bigger than him — it’s about the destruction of ALL black people and people of color in America,” Cosby spokesman Andrew Wyatt said when the court accepted the appeal late last month.

Cosby earned acclaim for his groundbreaking (and intentionally race-blind) performances on television in the 1950s; mingled, but rarely marched, with civil rights leaders and the black elite in the 1960s; and solidified his wealth and power with his star turn as “America’s Dad,” on “The Cosby Show” in the 1980s.

All the while, he promoted education and gave millions to historically black universities.

But his comments on poverty, parenthood and personal responsibility offended younger blacks in his later years, most famously in his 2004 “Pound Cake” speech — which he gave just months after the sexual encounter that would prove his downfall.

As he toured the country, Cosby argued that “the antidote to racism is not rallies, protests, or pleas, but strong families and communities,” as the Black Power essay Ta-Nehisi Coates said.

“Cosby’s gospel of discipline, moral reform, and self-reliance offers a way out — a promise that one need not cure America of its original sin in order to succeed,” Coates wrote in his 2008 piece in The Atlantic, “‘This Is How We Lost to the White Man’: The audacity of Bill Cosby’s black conservatism.”

The appeal issues the court accepted don’t directly include racial bias, which Cosby’s legal team raised more often on the courthouse steps in Montgomery County than inside the courtroom. His defenders, however, say race permeates the case.

Cosby’s celebrity “does not change his status as a black man,” said appellate lawyer Jennifer Bonjean, the latest of more than a dozen criminal lawyers on the case.

“It would be naïve to assume that his prosecution was not tainted by the same racial bias that pervades the criminal justice process in both explicit and insidious ways,” she said last week.

Cosby’s wife of 56 years has been more blunt.

In an interview last month with ABC-TV, Camille Cosby said the #MeToo movement ignores “the history of particular white women” who have “accused black males of sexual assault without any proof.”

“We know how women can lie,” said Camille Cosby.

The appeal hinges on two questions that have shaped the case from the start:

— Did Cosby have an ironclad deal with District Attorney Bruce Castor that Cosby could never be charged after Castor declined to arrest Cosby in 2005?

Defense lawyers say Cosby relied on such a promise when he gave the 2006 deposition later unsealed in accuser Andrea Constand’s lawsuit — and used against him at trial.

Castor agrees they did. But it was never put in writing, and Castor’s top deputy at the time, Risa Ferman, who helped run the initial investigation and reopened it in 2015 when she was district attorney, seemed not to know about it.

— And, how many other accusers should be allowed to testify before the scales of justice tip against the accused?

Cosby’s trial judge allowed just one other accuser in the first trial when the jury deadlocked, but five at the retrial a year later. The jury convicted Cosby on all three sex assault counts.

The state’s intermediate appeals court seemed unimpressed by either issue, rejecting Cosby’s first appeal.

“The reality of it is, he gives them drugs and then he sexually assaults them,” Superior Court Judge John T. Bender said at the arguments. “That’s the pattern, is it not?”

But Cosby appealed again, setting up the state Supreme Court arguments expected sometime next year.

Cosby lawyer Bonjean, though, believes the #MeToo movement is fading, and that Cosby, if he wins a new trial, might avoid what she called “the mob-justice standards of a hashtag movement.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press.