Friday, June 5, 2026

Trump Accuses Obama of Treason, Espionage in New Book

‘I have never ever said this, but truth is, they got caught spying…’

64 Ways Obama is Sabotaging Trump
Donald Trump & Barack Obama/PHOTO: White House

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Former President Barack Obama can add another achievement to his long list of historic “firsts” if his successor has any say in it: First President to Commit Treason.

President Donald Trump—who has previously levied the accusation against several other powerful Democrats, including House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff—told conservative author Doug Wead that Obama was guilty of the offense, punishable by execution, according to the Washington Examiner.

“What they did was treasonous, OK? It was treasonous,” Trump told Wead for his forthcoming book, Inside Trump’s White House: The Real Story of His Presidency.

Wead’s book covers many different aspects of Trump’s first years in office, including his successful steerage of the economy that had stagnated under Obama into a booming bull market with record-shattering unemployment.

However, few things cast a greater pall over his presidency than the Russian collusion hoax that sought to undermine Trump during and after the 2016 election.

Subsequent hearings revealed that members of the FBI and other intelligence agencies had worked closely with the Hillary Clinton campaign, the Democratic National committee and left-wing media outlets to propagate and spread the since-debunked claims.

While Trump was ultimately validated and largely exonerated by the Mueller Report in March 2019, the accusations may have contributed to Democrats retaking the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2018 midterm, spawning endless congressional oversight probes, subpoenas and the current impeachment inquisition into a July phone call with the Ukrainian president.

Few have been convicted treason in the U.S., with a Wikipedia page on the topic listing only 15, most of which stemmed from wartime offenses. Making such a case against Obama, particularly during his presidency, would pose considerable legal challenges.

But even if Trump indulged his characteristically hyperbolic rhetoric in making that accusation, another could be closer to its mark.

He also accused Obama and his intelligence operatives of espionage—a charge that may well be supported by Attorney General William Barr in the Justice Department’s ongoing criminal investigation of the Russian collusion conspiracy.

“I have never ever said this, but truth is, they got caught spying. They were spying,” Trump told Wead, before adding, “Obama.”

It is widely known that the FBI used the false pretenses of its unverified Russia information to wiretap the conversations of Trump adviser Carter Page with approval from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

They also are believed to have bugged Trump’s New York hotel, and some—including then-FBI Director James Comey—have admitted that they were approaching briefings with the president-elect as intelligence-gathering missions.

Only recently, though, has Obama’s direct role in orchestrating the attempted “coup” come more into focus.

In a recent interview, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, now a CNN analyst, admitted that the former president was calling the shots.

“The message I’m getting from all this is, apparently what we were supposed to have done was to ignore the Russian interference, ignore the Russian meddling and the threat that it poses to us,” Clapper told CNN anchor Jim Sciutto, “and oh, by the way, blown off what the then commander in chief, President Obama, told us to do, which was to assemble all the reporting that we could that we had available to us.”

Clapper and former CIA Director John Brennan have become prime subjects of interest in the DOJ probe being conducted by special prosecutor John Durham.

Many now wonder what evidence will emerge that could further validate Trump’s suspicions—and what charges, if any, Barr may pursue that would offer some measure of consolation to outraged conservatives while further deepening the country’s partisan divide.

Michelle Obama Targets Schools in Red States for ‘Nonpartisan’ Voter Education

0

‘Obviously, we shouldn’t be telling them how to vote or who to vote for…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Former First Lady Michelle Obama is seeking to educate school children—on how to properly vote for Democrats.

Obama recently announced that she planned to conduct a series of seminars on how to vote as part of an initiative called When We All Vote and its school-centric offshoot, My School Votes.

“Obviously, we shouldn’t be telling [students] how to vote or who to vote for,” Obama said in her message to educators. “We just want them to vote, period—to take that first step toward making voting a lifelong habit.”

In order to receive tax-free status, the operation claims to be a nonpartisan entity, but its objectives closely mirror those of activist, left-wing organizations designed to increase Democratic votes specifically.

My School Votes is “on a mission to increase participation in every election and close the race and age voting gap by changing the culture around voting, harnessing grassroots energy, and through strategic partnerships to reach every American,” according to its mission statement.

Since launching in July, the school-based initiative has signed up more than 2,000 students and teachers, Education Week reported.

Targeting Red States

Michelle’s husband, former President Barack Obama, is likewise planning a series of activist training seminars as part of an ongoing effort through the National Democratic Redistricting Committee to flip red states before the next round of district maps are drawn in 2021.

In both cases, the Obamas’ seminars are conveniently targeting battleground “purple” states that backed President Donald Trump in the 2016 election, as well as traditionally Republican states where population shifts have hinted at a possible electoral swing.

According to Education Week, Michelle plans to visit Michigan, Pennsylvania, Florida and Nevada during the month of November. Future workshops are scheduled in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Georgia, and several in North Carolina.

Most overlap with targets that the NDRC has identified as being vulnerable to its redistricting initiatives in the lead-up to next year’s presidential election.

Considerable speculation has centered around Michelle Obama entering the 2020 race, although she has emphatically dismissed the possibility.

Indoctrination and Dog Whistles

A “training video” on the My School Votes site, replete with left-wing dog-whistles, features students of color (and one token-white teacher) offering messages like “It’s up to us to help them harness this power” while encouraging voter registrants to “build a team around them that looks like the school’s student body.”

At a rally last year for When We All Vote, Obama seemed to be more explicit in her “us versus them” messaging.

“They’re finding all kinds of ways to keep you at home, hoping that when you hear about all those things, you’ll just give up,” she said, without clarifying who they were. “Don’t let anybody intimidate you from being a part of this process,” she said.

Included in the organization’s curriculum materials for students is a data-collection link so that My School Votes can track the success of participating schools.

The classroom resources encourage students to do targeted registration drives based on demographic information rather than “ineffective” mass-registration booths set up at events like football games.

However, teachers are asked to help with the “amplification” efforts before major vote drives by incorporating the materials into their lesson plans.

Lessons are conveniently provided at a separate website, ShareMyLesson.com, and emphasize important educational topics like social justice issues, the #MeToo movement, gun control and LGBT history.

Obama’s civic ‘education’ program also encourages involvement from those who are ineligible to vote.

“While undocumented students should not participate in actual voter registration, there are many ways to include ineligible students in the voter registration process even if they cannot register themselves,” says the voter registration action plan.

“Some examples include, helping with being part of the My School Votes team or amplifying Voter Registration Action Days,” the plan says. “It should be a focus to make voter registration and civic engagement an inclusive activity welcome to all members of the school community.”

Clinton Stooge Threatens Publisher to Block Release of New Russia-Gate Exposé

0

‘People in the Clinton world are keen for this book not to come out…’

Gowdy Implies Clintonista Sydney Blumenthal Fed Steele Info 1
Sidney Blumenthal / IMAGE: CNBC via YouTube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) GOP investigators appear to have struck a nerve with bad actors on the Left over the probe into a Russian collusion hoax that sought to undermine the presidency of Donald Trump.

As the ongoing Justice Department investigation expands into a criminal case, rattling deep-state CIA operatives, it seems members of Hillary Clinton‘s inner circle are also beginning to break a sweat.

Longtime Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal, who was implicated early on in Democrats’ efforts to collude with the FBI in promoting the notorious Steele Dossier, reportedly made legal threats to stop the publication of a new exposé by investigative journalist Lee Smith.

“The Clinton machine wanted to intimidate Lee,” a source familiar with the situation told Fox News.

Smith declined to address the alleged threats he received from Blumenthal or others, but he did acknowledge to Fox News that the Left had sought to stonewall its release.

“People in the Clinton world are keen for this book not to come out,” he said.

Barring further preventative measures from the Clinton camp, Smith’s book, The Plot Against the President, is due to be released on Oct. 29.

It relies heavily on interviews and information provided by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., who was the GOP chair of the House Intelligence Committee until Democrats retook the majority in January.

“Told from the perspective of Nunes and his crack investigators—men and women who banded together to do the right thing at a crucial moment for our democracy—the story of the biggest political scandal in a generation reads like a great detective novel, feels like a classic cowboy movie,” according to a descriptive blurb on Amazon.

While the transfer of power ended the congressional inquiries into the Democratic deep-state conspiracy—current House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is now leading the impeachment campaign against Trump—Nunes referred several people involved in the scandal to the DOJ for prosecution.

His collected evidence provided the foundation for the ongoing probes led by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horiwitz and special prosecutor John Durham, who recently expanded his to a criminal case based on new evidence.

Little has been said publicly about Blumenthal’s immediate connection with the debunked Steele Dossier. However, in a February 2018 interview with Fox News, former congressman Trey Gowdy, R-SC, strongly hinted that he was among those who had leaked the series of salacious and defamatory reports, which Clinton had commissioned left-wing opposition-research firm Fusion GPS to compile.

“[W]hen you hear who … one of the sources of that information is, you’re going to think, ‘Oh my gosh, I’ve heard that name somewhere before,'” Gowdy told Fox host Martha MacCallum.

Holder Makes Another Thuggish Threat: Trump Should ‘Get His A** Beaten’

0

‘When they go low, we kick ’em…’

Eric Holder Mocks Trump Supporters: 'Exactly When Did You Think America Was Great?'
Eric Holder / IMAGE: MSNBC via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Once again, former Attorney General Eric Holder used thinly coded language to encourage physical violence against a political adversary, saying President Donald Trump should “get his ass beaten.”

During a forum at George Washington University, Holder responded to recent headlines that Trump had likened House Democrats’ partisan impeachment hearings to a modern-day “lynching.”

Although it is a commonly used trope, often embraced by Democrats themselves to convey mob mentality, former President Barack Obama’s race-baiting, self-described “wingman” said the current president’s use of the term was “reprehensible,” reported the GWU student newspaper, the Hatchet.

“If you want to know who this guy is, you look at that,” Holder said. “That’s reflective of who this man is, and why he’s got to get his ass beaten in 2020.”

It was not immediately clear whether the statement might trigger a Secret Service investigation.

Although the ambiguous wording may suggest a political defeat as well as a physical assault, it follows a longstanding pattern of veiled threats and bullying from Holder.

He made his national debut in 2009 by refusing to prosecute Black Panther party members who had used voter-intimidation tactics during the previous year’s election.

Holder notably drew intense criticism before the 2018 midterm by revising a familiar phrase used by former First Lady Michelle Obama at the 2016 Democratic National Convention.

“It is time for us, as Democrats, to be as tough as they are, to be as dedicated as they are, to be as committed as they are,” Holder said at a Georgia campaign rally last October. “Michelle always says … ‘When they go low, we go high.’ No. When they go low, we kick ’em.”

The comment drew a rebuke from Michelle Obama. Holder later responded to the backlash by telling critics to “stop the fake outrage.”

Holder also offended many in a March interview with MSNBC by asking, ‘Exactly when did you think America was great?’ while advocating for radical policy proposals that included slavery reparations and Supreme Court packing.

His threats, however, are not limited to right-wing opponents. He demanded prior to a recent primary debate that Democrats “do better” instead of criticizing the legacy of the Obama administration.

“Many candidates spent too much time in the weeds, developing ‘gotcha’ moments or straining to draw personal or policy distinctions—at once testing viewers’ patience,” he warned.

Holder, who is now overseeing the far-left’s efforts to use court-forced gerrymandering to flip red states blue, has considerable funds and resources at his disposal through the National Democratic Redistricting Committee.

Obama recently folded his own former campaign arm, Organizing for Action, into the NDRC umbrella, and Alexander Soros—son of the notorious left-wing oligarch George Soros—hosted a fundraiser for it earlier this week.

Soros also was said to have been behind paid protest groups during the 2016 presidential race and in the lead-up to Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh‘s confirmation.

In both instances, activists frequently confronted ideological adversaries with invasive threats to property, privacy and personal space, physical intimidation, and even assault.

Other Democrats also have come under scrutiny for their exhortations of violence, including former Vice President Joe Biden, who said last year he would “beat the hell out of” Trump if the two were in high school.

At roughly the same time as Holder’s controversial comments, former candidate Hillary Clinton was criticized for saying Democrats “cannot be civil” with Republicans, and then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi declared that opponents who disagreed with Democrats must expect “collateral damage.”

Microsoft Boss Cuts Massive Campaign Check to Pelosi

0

‘We need Congress to remember the fundamental decency and humanitarian spirit that defines us as a people and a nation…’

Microsoft Boss Cuts Massive Campaign Check to Pelosi
Brad Smith / IMAGE: Recode via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Filings by the Federal Election Commission revealed recently that Microsoft President Brad Smith gave $125,000 to a victory fund supporting House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

It was one of many donations he made to left-wing candidates and organizations this year, including contributions to the presidential campaigns of former Vice President Joe Biden and California Sen. Kamala Harris, reported CNBC.

However, the Pelosi donation was by far the largest Smith has made this year and appeared to immediately follow Pelosi’s decision to proceed with an impeachment probe of President Donald Trump last month.

Smith has avoided making many direct political statements, CNBC said, but has indirectly criticized Trump policies in the past, including a June 2018 blog post that attacked the administration’s efforts to curb illegal immigration.

“[W]e need Congress to remember the fundamental decency and humanitarian spirit that defines us as a people and a nation,” he sniped. “In short, we need to take care of children.”

The Nancy Pelosi Victory Fund not only benefits the California congresswoman’s campaign, but also may allocate funds to other campaign organizations, such as the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, to disperse as they see fit.

It has raised $11.1 million so far this year, with another major contribution coming from Stewart and Lynda Resnick, the owners of beverage brands POM and FIJI Water, who gave $259,100. Deborah Simon, of the commercial real-estate investment firm Simon Property Group, gave the same amount.

Despite his decidedly left-skewed donation history, Smith has also given to some Republican campaigns in the past, including Sen. Cory Gardner‘s upcoming re-election campaign in Colorado.

That race promises to be tightly contested whether Gardner faces a challenge from former Gov. John Hickenlooper or another high-profile opponent, with Democrats hoping an upset there could tilt the Senate in their favor.

Last election cycle, Smith gave to the re-election campaign of Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas.

Conservative Rep. Refuses to Take CNN Reporter’s Impeachment Bias Bait

0

‘We don’t know whether what he said is true or not because of the sham process that’s being used…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., shut down a CNN correspondent attempting to spin the secretive testimony of a career diplomat as House Democrats continued to build their case for impeachment behind closed doors while selectively leaking information to the public.

Based on such leaks and the publicly available opening statement furnished by Ambassador William Taylor, left-wing media sought to claim that Taylor—who functioned as the top Ukraine diplomat after the removal of partisan Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch—made a case for coercion.

Democrats allege—although no clear evidence has been presented publicly—that Trump pressured the former Soviet satellite into revisiting an investigation of former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter by threatening to withdraw a promise of military aid to use in its defense against Russia.

After CNN’s Manu Raju sought to challenge Brooks about the ambassador’s opening statement, Brooks refused the bait.

“The opening statement doesn’t make any difference,” said Brooks, cutting off the CNN senior congressional correspondent.

“You should not be relying on it,” he continued. “If you were in a court of law … would you rely just on the opening statement of an attorney?”

Brooks reiterated a major point of objection raised by GOP congressmen that the refusal by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to call a vote on the closed-door hearings had prevented due process.

Dozens of Republicans stormed the Capitol basement on Wednesday to demand in a confrontation with House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff, D-Calif., that the proceedings involve more transparency, as well as the opportunity for rebuttal witnesses and cross-examination.

However, Democrats have resisted since much of the success of their partisan operation rests on steering public opinion for or against the president. Brooks said the information being made available was not necessarily the whole truth.

“We don’t know whether what he said is true or not because of the sham process that’s being used,” he said.

Schiff, already reputed for his public deceptions regarding Russian collusion, has repeatedly acted in bad faith while leading the latest impeachment charge.

He mischaracterized the transcript of the July phone call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, portraying it in a dramatized version as a “Mafia shakedown.”

He later received four “Pinocchios” from Washington Post fact-checkers for falsely claiming that he had not communicated with the so-called whistleblower whose complaint launched the Democrats’ latest probe.

On Tuesday, Brooks’ office released a statement saying he and other members of the House Freedom Caucus had met with Trump to express their ongoing support.

“We agreed that, to date, Socialist Democrats have produced no credible evidence of an impeachable offense and that the absence of credible evidence likely explains why the Socialist Democrats have insisted on secret, closed-door, Capitol basement proceedings that prevent the pubic, and even Members of Congress, from observing what is really happening,” he said.

City Changes Name of Fair Because ‘Dixie’ No Longer Acceptable

0

‘I just want peace and harmony, and if we can just move on from this and have an outstanding fair, the city will be pleased…’

 1
The Dixie Classic Fair in Winston–Salem, NC / IMAGE: eMarketWiz via Youtube

(Ben Sellers) The historic city of Winston–Salem, North Carolina, is set to prove it’s not just whistlin’ ‘Dixie’ when it comes to the controversial name-change of a beloved fall festival.

Facing pressure from local activists, it announced last year that it planned to rename the Dixie Classic Fair starting next year (with this year’s already having taken place).

On Monday, the city council officially moved to redub it the Carolina Classic, reported the Winston–Salem Journal.

The council already had formally voted in August to jettison the old name, meaning much of the debate centered around a new controversy: whether to go with the broader “Carolina” or the more regional “Piedmont” in the new name.

“The most neutral term, and the most descriptive one of the dirt I walk on every day, is the Piedmont,”council member John Larson said at the meeting Monday.

Over the objections of detractors—including one who said the city had “named the fair for Wendy’s hamburger”—the council voted 6-2 in favor of “Carolina.”

The state’s Sons of Confederate Veterans group released a statement criticizing the name change as a solution in search of a problem.

“This is just another manufactured controversy, created in the minds of a few politicians that are willing to waste nearly 100 thousand dollars to appease their ego, while insulting Southerners,” said the group.

But overall, the impassioned discussion and widespread interest in the fair’s name seemed largely to have tapered off, reported the Journal, with both options sufficiently innocuous and bland to appease social-justice warriors—for now.

“Either name would be all right as far as I’m concerned,” said council member Vivian Burke. “I just want peace and harmony, and if we can just move on from this and have an outstanding fair, the city will be pleased.”

The annual fall event, now in its 138th year, had included the “Dixie” part of its name since 1956, when it was changed from the Forsyth County Fair to reflect a broader regional interest. It began in the 1880s as the Wheat and Cattle Fair. The fair was for whites only until 1963.

In recent years, however, North Carolina has become a hotbed of protest and demands for historical revisionism in dealing with the state’s legacy on race and the Civil War. Several Confederate monuments have been targeted in cities like Chapel Hill and Durham.

In its northern neighbor, Virginia, the 2017 clash over Charlottesville‘s illegal efforts to remove monuments honoring Southern generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson turned deadly at a rally where neo-Nazis were confronted by Antifa counter-protestors brandishing projectiles, improvised blowtorches and other weapons.

A 21-year-old Ohio native, James Fields, who was reportedly a Nazi sympathizer, was found guilty of first-degree murder for driving his car into a crowd of activists who had blocked his path on the city’s Downtown Mall. Local protestor Heather Heyer, 32, was killed in the assault.

President Donald Trump, while broadly condemning the violence, sought unity and reconciliation by noting that there were “very fine people on both sides,” but his critics on the Left attacked the statement as racist.

Dem. 2020 Candidate Calls for Free Tampons on Nat’l Period Day

‘We become the first state in the nation to … empower women to make their own decisions about what goes into their bodies…’

Editor’s Note: Article contains subject matter some may find uncomfortable

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Some said a major holiday last week was about exploration; others, about exploitation.

But for presidential hopeful Julian Castro, the second full week of October was all about ovulation.

Although dozens of leftist locales across the country spurned Christopher Columbus—instead recognizing Indigenous People’s Day on the second Monday of October—the following Saturday they swapped their wampum for tampons in honor of National Period Day.

Just like the monthly visitor has caught some women by surprise, so, too, was the annual holiday an unexpected addition to the calendar for many.

On his radio show Monday, conservative host Rush Limbaugh not only marveled that the fertile-female affliction had its own fete day, but he also was baffled by some of the equipment involved.

“Dawn, did you know there was a National Period Day?” Limbaugh asked a staff member. “How would you celebrate National Period Day? How can men participate in National Period Day? … I mean, who knew that people were missing work because they couldn’t afford tampons.”

He went on to puzzle over what the “cups” were that Castro had referenced.

“You don’t know what cups are for women?” Limbaugh again asked the female staffer.

“Well, you’re the women’s expert on this staff and you don’t know what cups are for women?,” he said. “You gotta think transgender, I think, if you’re gonna think cups for women. I’m guessing. Hell, I don’t know, either.”

Presidential Hopeful Julián Castro Says All Border Crossings Should Be Decriminalized
Julian Castro / IMAGE: MSNBC via Youtube

Still, Limbaugh added, Obama’s far-left former housing secretary had succeeded in raising greater awareness of a serious concern—which seemed nothing like a cynical attempt to pander to feminist voters. (Castro’s poll numbers hover around the low single digits in the Democratic primary race.)

“All I know is that I learned something today,” Limbaugh said, “that there are women cowering in the corners at home afraid to go to work because they don’t have government-paid-for-tampons.”

Castro is not the only Democrat to embrace menstrual cycles as a pathway to electoral success.

Earlier this month, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed into effect new legislation that required the packaging on all feminine-hygiene products to include a clearly printed list of ingredients.

Cuomo called it another component in the ongoing battle for reproductive health being championed by Democrats in New York.

“It’s part of the pervasive culture of inequality in our society that has gone on for too long,” he said in a statement, “and that injustice ends today as we become the first state in the nation to mandate ingredient disclosure and empower women to make their own decisions about what goes into their bodies.”

In January, New York became the first state also to legalize late-term abortions, a controversial practice that some—including Virginia’s Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam—admitted might blur the lines with infanticide in some cases.

Most Democrats also have come out in favor of government subsidies for reproductive concerns—even pregnancies that are the consequence of personal choices.

Front-runner Joe Biden joined most others in the Left’s candidate pool this summer by changing his long-held stance in support of the Hyde Amendment, which sought to prevent tax funds from supporting fetal terminations except in extreme cases.

Under President Donald Trump, however, organizations such as Planned Parenthood that perform abortions have been blocked from receiving federal funding.

Democrats, despite their own affection for ‘Auntie Flo’ also tried to bludgeon Trump as a misogynist after he appeared to suggest debate moderator Megyn Kelly was on her cycle.

“You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever,” Trump said in August 2015.

Liberals Apoplectic after Rally Cries of ‘Trump Jr. 2024!’

0

‘He’s just like his father and I can’t wait to vote for him someday too…’

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) One surefire way President Donald Trump could dodge another impeachment inquisition in his second term: Name his son as his running mate.

After rally-goers last week in San Antonio, Texas, cheered Donald Trump Jr., with cries of “2024!,” some on the Left already were beginning to panic at the very thought of a Don Dynasty.

Following the cheers, the Associated Press noted that Don Jr.—accompanied by his girlfriend, former Fox News personality Kimberly Guilfoyle, as well as Trump 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale—responded with a dramatic pause.

He then yelled, “Let’s worry about 2020 first!”

The AP quoted audience members and GOP insiders praising Don Jr. as a rising GOP star.

“He’s the future,” said Annie Davidson, 65, of Alamo Heights. “He’s just like his father and I can’t wait to vote for him someday too.”

But AP writer Jonathan Lemire seemed less enthused.

He reported that the president’s eldest son was “another bombastic provocateur who revels in the tribal loyalty of the supporters” and cautioned that Don Jr. “has become a master preacher” while providing the warm-up act at his father’s rallies.

“His speeches are laced with the same incendiary, sometimes false rhetoric as his father’s, at times even questioning whether Democrats can call themselves Christians,” said Lemire. “But in these venues, his word is gospel.”

The news agency attacked him as hypocritical for denouncing Hunter Biden‘s influence-peddling in Ukraine and China, attempting to paint a false equivalency between the two political scions.

But while drug-addled Hunter Biden was regularly on the receiving end of his powerful father’s patronage, Don Jr. has invested his time and energy in service of supporting his beleaguered namesake—drawing even more contrast between the two legacies.

“I expect Don to be a player in the conservative movement for years and years to come,” said Republican strategist Andrew Surabian.

The conservative BizPac Review observed that the AP’s journalists weren’t the only ones roiled by the thought of Don Jr.’s political future.

RINO commentator Rick Wilson unleashed a bombastic attack on him last month in an op-ed for the far-left Daily Beast.

“[T]he clues have been there all along that the real 2024 primary will be between Donald J. Trump Jr. and everyone else,” Wilson said.

After the Washington Times posted video of the San Antonio rally, Twitter trolls also unleashed their fury.

Several, at a loss for words, instead used memes, gifs and emoticons to convey their displeasure.

‘Rattled’ Deep-State CIA Agents Lawyer Up as DOJ’s Durham Closes In

0

‘No one’s even sure whether this is a criminal investigation or not…’

 1
John Durham / PHOTO: U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Connecticut via Facebook

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) As a Justice Department probe into the Russia collusion hoax that cast a pall over President Donald Trump’s early presidency begins to close in, some of the CIA analysts behind it are beginning to lawyer up.

 

On Monday’s “Morning Joe,” NBC News reporter Ken Dilanian said that agents involved in the faulty intelligence assessment feared the investigation being led by special prosecutor John Durham may turn into a criminal probe, the Washington Examiner reported.

“It’s really not clear where he’s going with this, but a lot of people are very rattled,” Dilanian said. “Those CIA analysts I mentioned had to hire their own lawyers because no one’s even sure whether this is a criminal investigation or not.”

Despite earlier speculation that Durham—who reportedly spent considerable time investigating in Europe—may soon be wrapping up his work, Dilanian reported over the weekend that, in fact, the investigation is expanding.

In recent weeks, several cases closed by the Justice Department’s inspector general have pointed to glaring evidence of misconduct among the top brass of the intelligence community, both during and in the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election.

One widely publicized IG report, for example, found that former FBI Director James Comey improperly purloined classified FBI material when he gave memos of his early meetings with Trump to a Columbia University professor who then leaked them to media sources.

Justice IG Michael Horowitz also has rebuked Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and counterespionage agent Peter Strzok for their part in a widespread culture of selectively leaking information to the press.

While the IG reports have, in some cases, recommended prosecution, the DOJ thus far has declined the cases. However, that has only fueled more speculation that Durham’s far-reaching investigation may offer something of a denouement.

Former Intel Diretcor Chief James Clapper Turns on Brennan
John Brennan and James Clapper (screen shot: CNN/Youtube)

Both Obama-era CIA Director John Brennan and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper have also been named focuses of the investigation, which now has pushed beyond its earlier scope to include actions taken in January 2017 as Trump was preparing to take office.

Dilanian said that even the Deep State‘s network of spies and leakers was, for once, being kept in the dark.

“If it is a criminal investigation, what is the allegation of wrongdoing?” he wondered. “No one I talked to can answer that.”

With no charges yet having been filed, however, the CIA operatives’ decision to seek legal counsel raises even more questions about what dubious conduct they need to be shielded from.

Appearing earlier this month on CNN, where he is now a paid analyst, Clapper seemed eager to deflect accountability by claiming he and his cohorts were merely following the orders given by then-President Barack Obama.

“The message I’m getting from all this is, apparently what we were supposed to have done was to ignore the Russian interference, ignore the Russian meddling and the threat that it poses to us,” Clapper told CNN anchor Jim Sciutto, “and oh, by the way, blown off what the then commander in chief, President Obama, told us to do, which was to assemble all the reporting that we could that we had available to us.”

Dilanian echoed a similar talking point, suggesting on Twitter that the lingering suspicions of partisan collusion between the Hillary Clinton campaign, U.S. intelligence community and foreign agents were merely a “fever dream” of the president’s base.