CHART: Lady A’s Name-Change Saga Perfectly Mirrors South’s History

In a recent statement attacking the band formerly known as Lady Antebellum, Seattle R&B singer Anita White hinted that the “privilege” they exerted was all too familiar to struggling and downtrodden black artists.

The Nashville country-pop trio “has used their wealth and influence to intimidate and bully me into submission without offering any real recompense for appropriating my name,” White said.

An ironic twist in the Grammy-winning band’s late show of virtue-signaling came after its attempt to right the self-inflicted wrong of invoking a vaguely controversial term backfired.

While trying to whitewash its reference to the “Antebellum South”—i.e. the artistic, literary, architectural and sartorial Southern fashions of the era that predated the Civil War, when a select few aristocrats ran lavish plantations—the newly woke band quickly learned that White also laid claim to their chosen replacement, “Lady A,” as her stage name.

After White demanded $10 million in reparations for the appropriation of her performance moniker, the two sides reached an impasse.

Even worse than a costly legal battle over the trademark is the embarrassing public-relations fallout for the band, whose innocuous, honey-laced harmonies—paired with Music Row’s ham-handed overproduction—had, heretofore, been the very antithesis of offensive.

But White is not the only one who might be forgiven for seeing a historical holding pattern in the band’s presumption of ownership for something it had no right to claim.

In fact, the entire episode might be said to mirror the past two-plus centuries of Southern history—and particularly the awkward habit its more liberal denizens have of overcompensating for the perceived shame of their Southern identity.

To be certain, the South’s original sin of slavery was a horrific blight in its culture and nothing to be marginalized.

But it is precisely in such marginalization of race issues that many have continually missed the mark, instead tacking hard to the extremes, and making their own misery that much worse.

The chart below shows the saga of both Southern Democrats and Nashville’s Lady A, from their respective origins through their “Antebellum” periods and into modern times.

Lady Antebellum
George Floyd memorial
A 20-foot mural of George Floyd near the spot where he died in Minneapolis was one of the scenes President Donald Trump depicted in a tribute video censored by Twitter. / IMAGE: CBS Evening News
Lady Antebellum
Seattle's Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Seattle’s Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone / IMAGE: screenshot via Twitter
Lady Antebellum
Hillary and Bill Clinton
Hillary and Bill Clinton / IMAGE: Fox Business via YouTube
Lady Antebellum chart 1

Schiff Pre-Emptively Spins DOJ’s Criminal Probe into Russia Hoax

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff is nervous about U.S. Attorney John Durham’s investigation into the origins of the Russia-Gate hoax and how Attorney General William Barr could use it.

Schiff suggested in a recent episode of the Talking Feds podcast that Barr would use Durham’s investigation to “protect the president” and go after his “political enemies,” including some of the congressional Democrats who pushed the debunked Russian collusion conspiracy.

“One of the concerns I have with Bill Barr is that the worst is yet to come,” Schiff claimed.

“I mean, he’s got a terrible, destructive track record as it is, and it may get worse in the coming days,” Schiff explained. “But what we have seen largely is Barr’s intervention to protect the president.”

Barr doesn’t just use a “shield” to “protect corruption writ large of his boss,” Schiff said. He uses a “sword,” or “the “power of the Justice Department through Durham or others to go after the president’s enemies.”

“And so I continue to be concerned with the president, who is tweeting about how Obama and Biden should go to prison, that Bill Barr may be preparing the use of the sword in a politicized and dangerous and desperate way,” Schiff said.

Barr has repeatedly said that he does not expect Durham to target either former President Barack Obama or presidential candidate Joe Biden.

He did, however, tell Fox News last month that there would be “developments” in Durham’s investigation by the end of the summer.

Schiff has blasted Durham for keeping his committee in the dark, but Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said that it’s a “good thing” that Durham and “his people” aren’t talking.

“I think that’s a good sign that this is a real, legitimate investigation that’s occurring,” Nunes said.

Durham’s investigation is likely unnerving to Schiff because he knows that the many lies he and other congressional Democrats used to push the Russia-Gate hoax are about to be exposed.

The full transcripts from the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia-Gate investigation confirm that Schiff repeatedly lied about a “smoking gun” that would implicate Trump, when the reality was that there was no concrete evidence backing Democrats’ claims at all.

“It was a very dangerous situation what they did,” President Trump said during an interview with Fox and Friends. “These are dirty politicians and dirty cops and some horrible people and hopefully they’re going to pay a big price in the not too distant future.”

Leftist Leaders Can’t Get Chaos Under Control in Portland; Blame the Feds

0

(Headline USA) Nearly two months of violent clashes with police have prompted soul-searching in Portland, Oregon, a city that prides itself on its progressive reputation but is increasingly polarized over how to handle the unrest.

President Donald Trump recently deployed federal agents to quell the riots in Portland that began after George Floyd’s death at the hands of Minneapolis police. The national attention comes as divisions deepen among elected officials about the legitimacy of the more violent protests — striking at the heart of Portland’s identity as an ultraliberal haven where protest is seen as a badge of honor.

“I was born and raised here, and I’m a graduate of the local public school system. I chose to make my livelihood here, I chose to raise my daughter here,” said Mayor Ted Wheeler, who has faced criticism from all sides. “And in all the years that I have lived here, I have never seen the community more divided. Nor have I seen it look worse.”

Groups of protesters have set fires, launched fireworks and sprayed graffiti on public buildings, including police precincts and the federal courthouse, leading to nearly nightly clashes with police who have had to use force. Similar criminal activity engulfed many U.S. cities when Floyd died after a Minneapolis police officer pressed a knee to his neck on May 25. But in Portland, which is familiar ground for the far-left activists known as Antifa, or anti-fascists, the protests never stopped.

Lost in the debate are the downtown businesses racking up millions in property damage and lost sales and the voices of the hundreds of thousands of Portland residents who have stayed off the streets.

“The impact is terrible because what people have seen on the TV … has scared people who live outside the downtown. They feel it’s that way 24 hours a day,” said David Margulis, who said the protests have caused sales at his jewelry store to drop more than 50%. “I talk to people, on the phone, who tell me: ‘I don’t know if I’ll ever come downtown again.’”

Police have arrested dozens of people, dispersing protesters with tear gas on multiple occasions. Federal law enforcement officers were sent in two weeks ago by Trump to try to stop the unrest.

The mayor and police have repeatedly decried the clashes as a destructive distraction from the Black Lives Matter movement and make a sharp distinction between peaceful demonstrators and those bent on engaging with authorities, whom the police call “agitators.” Other officials, including several city commissioners, Democratic Gov. Kate Brown and Oregon’s House speaker, have criticized — without showing evidence — the police for being too aggressive.

Wheeler explicitly blamed the violence on the federal presence, even though he had lost control of the city before they arrived.

“Each night’s protest is now turning into a protest of the night before’s police activity. And so when people say we want this to stop, it can’t stop because today’s protest will be about what the feds or the Portland Police Bureau did yesterday,” said Gregory McKelvey, an activist and critic of the police response.

“There’s really this battle that we’re having right now — a communications war over who’s a ‘good protester’ and who’s a ‘bad protester.’ And what the police and the mayor are trying to do is turn the city against the people that are out protesting,” he said.

Some members of the Black community, which makes up less than 6% of Portland’s population, say the continual clashes with police — including in a historically Black part of the city — are distracting from the message of racial justice.

“It’s very clear to me that this is not about accomplishing goals. This is about anarchy, and people are taking advantage of the demonstrations for their own reasons that have nothing to do with social justice,” said Ron Herndon, a prominent civil rights activist. “Any support you think you could get, you probably have lost from a lot of people because you have negatively impacted their lives.”

Jo Ann Hardesty, the first Black woman on Portland’s City Council, said protesters don’t need to destroy property to effect change but believes the violence is a reaction to a newfound understanding, particularly among white people, about “how abusive the police can be.”

Nevertheless, Hardesty, who has dedicated her career to police reform, is confident Portland will come out of this stronger. She’s working to get a measure before voters — circumventing the powerful police union — to create an independent police review board. She also led a push last month to cut $27 million from the police budget.

“We have to all figure out, how do we move the city forward? What we know is that we can’t protest forever and ever. And what we know is that people want real change,” Hardesty said. “I think the more we invite people in, the less disruption we’ll see on our streets.”

Adapted from reporting by Associated Press.

Universities Threaten to Keep Students’ Housing $$, Even if They Shut Down Again

At least two public universities in North Carolina—one tied to the state’s flagship UNC system—said they will keep student housing money if they shut down again due to coronavirus hysteria.

It was revealed that both Western Carolina University and the University of North Carolina at Greensboro would not give refunds to students due to a new addendum in their housing contracts, The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal reported.

The addendum does not specifically mention the coronavirus lockdowns.

If there are “closures, restrictions, and/or adjustments to the housing services schedule, the University shall not have the obligation to issue a partial refund or credit for such interruptions or adjustments.”

UNC-Greensboro said the addendum came from the UNC central administration, not from the Greensboro campus.

UNC-Greensboro’s COVID-19 FAQ page gives a vague response to questions about the policy.

“Some have interpreted this guidance as a definitive decision not to issue refunds under any circumstances, but that is not accurate,” the FAQ page said.

“If the UNC System institutions are able to offer financial relief to students—in the form of refunds or other measures—we would certainly like to do so.”

Yet, the university concludes that UNC-Greensboro cannot issue “any definitive decisions or commitments now on future refunds.”

Both North Carolina State University and UNC-Chapel Hill said they will prorate housing costs by issuing refunds to students for the time that they cannot live on campus.

The dilemma schools face comes as the virus closures become an increasingly polarized point of political contention.

Democrat Gov. Roy Cooper, despite marching without a mask during recent Black Lives Matter protests and encouraging mass gatherings, has recently imposed arbitrary closures, which included cancellation of the state Republican convention.

The national convention, which was set to take place in Charlotte, was relocated to Jacksonville, Fla., after Cooper refused to offer assurances that he would not try to sabotage it with extreme social-distancing fiats.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration on Tuesday backed off a threat to force international students to return home if schools held online-only classes.

The policy appeared to be aimed at encouraging the schools to reopen by tying it to their own profits.

However, several prominent universities—including Harvard, Johns Hopkins and the Massachusetts Institute for Technology—filed suit complaining that the “arbitrary” change would ruin their existing plans.

That means it is more likely that schools which attempt to reopen with safety measures in place are the ones more likely to incur lost expenditures, being subject to the capricious whims of state executives like Cooper.

Laura Comino, a UNC-Greensboro student, started a petition on Change.org that asks the school for a “comprehensive plan,” “an apology and explanation,” and “a system-wide guarantee of refunds.”

39,000 people have signed the petition.

UNC-Greensboro issued partial refunds to students who were forced to leave campus during the spring shutdown.

UNC schools refunded $77 million to students.

Headline USA’s Ben Sellers contributed to this report.

PUTIN’S PUPPET? Trump Warns US Firms About Work on Russian Pipelines

(Associated Press) The Trump administration on Wednesday hardened its efforts to prevent the completion of new German-Russian and Turkish-Russian natural gas pipelines by warning companies involved in the projects they’ll be subject to U.S. penalties unless they halt their work.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced the administration is ending grandfather clauses that had spared firms previously involved in the pipelines’ construction from sanctions authorized by the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, a 2017 law aimed at punishing Russia, in particular, for interference in U.S. elections and other matters.

The move opens the door for U.S. economic and financial penalties to be imposed on any European and other foreign company over the Nord Stream 2 and TurkStream projects, including those that had been working on the pipelines before the passage of CAATSA and had been previously exempted from the penalties.

The Trump administration has lobbied Europe, particularly Germany, to abandon the pipelines, which it believes will increase the continent’s dependence on Russian energy. Wednesday’s step comes as congressional legislation that would mandate the imposition of sanctions that had been authorized by CAATSA is advancing.

Pompeo said he would raise the matter on a brief trip to Europe next week when he plans to visit Britain and Denmark. Denmark last year lifted environmental objections to a portion of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, allowing for work to start on its completion.

The U.S. has been an outspoken opponent of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which would transport natural gas about 750 miles under the Baltic Sea from Russia to Germany. Along with eastern European countries that also oppose the project, the U.S. government argues that it will make Europe dangerously dependent on Russia.

Already the threat of U.S. sanctions has led one company that had not been covered by the grandfather clause to suspend its work on the pipeline. Late last year, the Swiss firm Allseas, which operated ships laying sections of the undersea pipeline, said it was halting work in anticipation of sanctions.

Nord Stream 2 is owned by Russia’s Gazprom, with investment from several European companies. The German government has said it regrets the threat of sanctions and considers them interference in the country’s domestic affairs. However, Chancellor Angela Merkel made it clear last week that Germany isn’t considering retaliation against the sanctions.

Russia has said it is, however, considering retaliatory measures. Pompeo spoke to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Monday, and President Donald Trump spoke to Turkey’s president on Tuesday, but there was no indication that the pipelines had been discussed.

With TurkStream, Russian gas passes through the Black Sea to Turkey. Together, the two 578-mile TurkStream lines under the Black Sea, along with the Russian and Turkish onshore pipes, have the capacity to carry 31.5 billion cubic meters (1.1 trillion cubic feet) of natural gas annually.

MO. GOV.: Trump Watching Soros-Funded DA’s Treatment of St. Louis Couple

(Headline USA) Missouri Gov. Mike Parson said President Donald Trump is focused on and concerned about the possibility that a St. Louis couple could face criminal charges for displaying guns as they defended their home during a racial injustice protest that broke into and invaded their private community.

Parson told reporters Tuesday that he had just been on the phone with Trump and U.S. Attorney General William Barr. The phone call came amid reports that St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, a Democrat, may file charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey, both of them lawyers in their 60s. The couple wielded guns on June 28 as rowdy protesters marched by their Renaissance palazzo-style mansion on the way to the home of St. Louis Mayor Lyda Krewson.

A police report said the couple heard a loud commotion and saw a large group of people break an iron gate marked with “No Trespassing” and “Private Street” signs.

Video showed agitators walking through the gate after it was damaged. The widely viewed video showed Mark McCloskey wielding a long-barreled gun and Patricia McCloskey standing next to him waving a handgun.

The actions of the couple have drawn scorn and ridicule from some, praise and support from others. Gardner’s spokeswoman said Tuesday that the case is still under investigation and no charges have been filed, though authorities executed a search warrant at the mansion late last week and seized a rifle.

Parson, a Republican and a staunch Trump supporter, is also a former sheriff and state representative who co-authored Missouri’s “castle doctrine” law that justifies the use of deadly force when protecting one’s home.

Parson said he told Trump that it’s difficult to remove an elected official from office in Missouri, though he didn’t say if Trump had asked if Gardner could be removed.

“I think the president didn’t like what he was seeing, and the way people are being treated,” Parson said. “I think you’ll see some sort of actions.”

In an interview Tuesday with Townhall Media, Trump defended the couple, saying “they were going to be beat up badly, if they were lucky” and that their house was going to be ransacked and probably burned, after violent riots have broken out in major cities all over the country. He called talk of prosecuting them a disgrace.

It’s unclear what either Trump or Barr could do, but Parson said he expects that both “are going to take a look at it.”

Gardner noted in a statement Tuesday that she hasn’t decided whether to file charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey. She also said Trump and Parson continue to “play politics with the handling of this matter, spreading misinformation and distorting the truth.”

“It is unbelievable the Governor of the state of Missouri would seek advice from one of the most divisive leaders in our generation to overpower the discretion of a locally elected prosecutor,” Gardner said, adding that “It is also incredible that at a time when our nation is dealing with a rapidly spreading deadly virus and our State reported a record number of new infections, they are launching these dog-whistle attacks against me.”

Gardner became St. Louis’s first-ever Black circuit attorney when she took office after winning election in 2016, with financial contributions from radical liberal billionaire George Soros. Her 3 ½ years in office have drawn strong support from the Black community, especially for reform efforts aimed at reducing incarceration and stopping the prosecution of low-level crimes such as marijuana possession.

But she’s also drawn scorn from others, accusing her of being weak on crime and motivated by politics.

In 2018, Gardner charged then-Gov. Eric Greitens with felony invasion of privacy for allegedly taking a compromising photo of a woman during an extra-marital affair. Greitens, a Republican, denied the allegation and the charge was eventually dropped, but he resigned in June that year.

St. Louis annually ranks among the nation’s deadliest cities, and 2020 is on pace for one of its deadliest years ever. Parson is planning a special session to address violent crime in St. Louis and Kansas City, and he said Gardner should be focused on crime, too, not the McCloskeys.

“That couple had every right to protect their property,” Parson said.

Trump “understands the situation in Missouri, he understands the situation in St. Louis, and how out of control it is for a prosecutor to let violent criminals off and not do their job and try to attack law-abiding citizens,” Parson said.

“The president said he would do everything he could within his powers to help with this situation, that he would be taking action to do that. I’m thankful that he’s getting involved in the situation, I’m thankful that he’s going to stand up for people on their legal rights and we’re going to move forward in this state,” Parson said.

Adapted from reporting by Associated Press.

Trump Adviser on Fauci: He’s Been Wrong About Everything

White House economic adviser Peter Navarro cast doubt on Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, in an op-ed on Wednesday, reminding the American public that Fauci has been wrong about almost everything throughout the coronavirus pandemic.

In late January, when President Trump banned travel to and from China, Fauci opposed the policy, Navarro noted.

He also told the public not to worry about the coronavirus pandemic, while other White House advisers urged the president to take the virus seriously, Navarro alleged.

“When I was working feverishly on behalf of the president in February to help engineer the fastest industrial mobilization of the health care sector in our history, Fauci was still telling the public the China virus was low risk,” Navarro wrote. “When we were building new mask capacity in record time, Fauci was flip-flopping on the use of masks.”

In short, the public should take Fauci’s advice for what it is, Navarro argued: It’s advice. 

Shortly after Navarro’s op-ed was published, the White House distanced itself from his criticism of Fauci and said that Navarro’s comments had not been approved by the White House before they were published.

Asked about Navarro’s op-ed directly, Trump said that he has a “very good relationship” with Fauci.

Navarro, however, isn’t the only Republican with concerns about Fauci.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., challenged Fauci back in May for acting like his opinion on the coronavirus is the “end-all.”

“I don’t think you’re the one person that gets to make a decision,” Paul said. “We can listen to your advice, but there are people on the other side saying there’s not going to be a surge and that we can safely open the economy.”

NYC Forced to Repeal Law That Banned Sexual-Orientation Counseling

Few things could be more intrusive than government officials censoring speech inside private religious counseling sessions.

But that’s exactly what New York City public officials did until Tuesday.

Thanks to the efforts of the religious-liberties watchdog Alliance Defending Freedom and an orthodox Jewish psychotherapist, the city was forced to repeal an unconstitutional First Amendment ordinance that targeted conservative religious groups and sexual orientation counseling.

The city—more aptly, taxpayers—will also pay $100,000 to reimburse the ADF and psychotherapist Dr. Dovid Schwartz for legal costs.

“All New Yorkers and all Americans deserve the right to private conversations, free from government control,” said ADF senior counsel Roger Brooks after the hard-fought victory.

In 2018, the city council adopted a law making it illegal to provide services for a fee that “seek to change a person’s sexual orientation or seek to change a person’s gender identity to conform to the sex of such individual that was recorded at birth.”

The law was a one-way street, according to Brooks.

It did not prohibit sexual orientation counseling if it encouraged same-sex lifestyles or gender transition, only heterosexual-oriented counseling.

The law also threatened willing adult patients and religious counselors with financial ruin. Fines were $1,000, $5,000 or $10,000 for first, second and subsequent violations.

ADF and Dr. Schwartz sued based on Schwartz’s 50 years of religious counseling experience and the blatantly unconstitutional nature of the speech and religion violations.

In Schwartz v. City of New York, Schwartz asserted that he has regularly encountered and served patients who want his help overcoming same-sex attraction.

“Because of their religious beliefs and personal life goals, clients who seek his counsel often desire to experience opposite-sex attraction so they can marry, form a natural family and live consistently with their Orthodox Jewish faith,” an ADF statement said.

“While the city eventually saw the writing on the wall and reversed course, it needlessly cost the taxpayers of New York tens of thousands of dollars for enacting its unconstitutional policy in the first place, because Dr. Schwartz was forced to go to court to protect his rights,” said Brooks.

Brooks also warned other public officials not to repeat New York City’s error or he’d see them in court.

Trump’s Lawyers May Claim Harassment to Defy Tax Returns Quest

(Associated Press) A week after losing a Supreme Court ruling, President Donald Trump’s lawyers said Wednesday they’re considering challenging a subpoena for his tax records by criminal prosecutors on grounds that it’s a fishing expedition or a form of harassment or retaliation against him.

The plans were outlined in a letter to a Manhattan federal judge overseeing legal squabbles related to Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.’s request to Trump’s longtime accountant for eight years of the president’s personal and corporate tax records in a criminal probe.

The judge, Victor Marrero, scheduled a hearing for Thursday.

Vance is seeking the records in part for a probe of payments that Trump’s then-personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, arranged during the 2016 presidential race to keep the porn actress Stormy Daniels and model Karen McDougal from airing their claims of extramarital affairs with Trump. Trump has denied the affairs.

Cohen was sentenced to three years in prison after pleading guilty to charges related to campaign finance and lying to Congress, among other crimes.

In its ruling last week, the Supreme Court rejected arguments by Trump’s lawyers and the Justice Department that the president cannot be investigated while he holds office or that a prosecutor must show a greater need than normal to obtain the tax records.

The top court returned the fight over the subpoena to Marrero, saying Trump’s lawyers may still challenge it in the same manner as anyone served with a subpoena.

Lawyers for the Republican president noted that the Supreme Court in its ruling said they can raise arguments that the subpoenas seek too much information, or are designed to impede Trump’s constitutional duties or harass, manipulate or retaliate against him. 

“The President intends to raise some or all of these arguments,” the lawyers wrote.

Lawyers for the prosecutor wrote in the jointly submitted letter that Trump’s lawyers are asking for more than they are allowed. They said Trump’s lawyers are basing their plans on a concurring opinion that conflicts with the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in the case, and that the lower-court judge already rejected the same arguments Trump’s lawyers are suggesting they might make.

Last September, Trump’s lawyers argued to Marrero that the subpoena requests by Vance were a “bad faith effort to harass” Trump. The judge rejected the argument.

“This Court has already found that there was no demonstrated bad faith, harassment, or any other unusual circumstance,” Vance’s lawyers wrote. “And this Court has rejected the President’s claim that there was any evidence of a ‘secondary motive’ that goes beyond good faith enforcement of the criminal laws.”

Lawyers for Vance, a Democrat, also objected to a request from Trump’s lawyers that they be entitled to gather new evidence before the subpoenas are enforced and that nothing occur until the Supreme Court issues a mandate.

In Wednesday’s letter, they also expressed confidence after the Supreme Court victory, saying they could enforce the subpoena immediately but were holding off, “provided the appropriate schedule moves on an expedited basis.”

Never-Trumpers to Air Ads to Pull Christian Support from President

The Bill Kristol-fronted NeverTrump group Republican Voters Against Donald Trump will air advertisements online and on Fox News in North Carolina to convince Christians and conservatives to withhold their support from President Donald Trump, The Hill reported.

The group will air a video titled, “Trump is Using Us,” which argues that Trump appeals to Christians for political expediency, not out of a sincere desire to protect religious liberty and America’s Christian heritage.

This initiative is part of Defending Democracy Together, a group founded to bolster the Trump-Ukraine hoax and the subsequent impeachment and trial.

Ex-Republicans, including Kristol and former Jeb Bush aide Tim Miller, launched the inaccurately named effort in May 2020.

Kristol changed his party affiliation to Democratic and will vote for former Vice President Joe Biden in 2020.

Miller said he, too, will vote for Biden in 2020, too.

In the above video, a man named Pat said, “Christians have to resist being used to justify things that Jesus would never justify.”

The ad does not contain any new insights, but it instead parrots the corporate media’s talking points and rehashes old scandals.

NeverTrump speakers mention the Access Hollywood tape; the Charlottesville, Va. spin; and the Lafayette Park-St. Johns incident.

“The moment that he held up that Bible, he revealed this president is using us,” Pat said.

Ironically, the advertisement appeals to the emotions of Christians by playing “Amazing Grace” and reading 1 Corinthians 13:4-8.

Yet, they use these Christian messages to build support for Biden, a radical, anti-Christian candidate who supports transgenderism and the murder of unborn children.

Trump campaign spokesperson Erin Perrine dismissed concerns about Trump losing support from Republicans.

“This is the swamp—yet again—trying to take down the duly elected President of the United States,” she said.

“President Trump is the leader of a united Republican Party where he has earned 94% of Republican votes during the primaries—something any former president of any party could only dream of.”