Church Ordered to Halt Indoor Services in Ongoing Legal Fight w/ Los Angeles County

0

(Courthouse News Service) A California judge on Thursday ordered a megachurch to stop holding indoor worship services in the ongoing legal battle between Los Angeles County health officials and church officials who refuse to follow health orders meant to slow the spread of the coronavirus.

The Grace Community Church of the Valley located in Sun Valley has continued to hold large-scale church services despite county health orders banning large indoor gatherings.

On Thursday, LA County Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff ordered the church to stop holding its services under county and state health orders.

“The Court, having considered the papers submitted by the parties, and having heard arguments of counsel, finds that there is an immediate threat to public health and safety due to the COVID-19 pandemic,” Beckloff wrote.

He said the “harm to the general public, including all residents of Los Angeles County, from the nonissuance of a preliminary injunction outweighs the harm to defendants from the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”

Beckloff also wrote that any outdoor worship services would need to comply with local and state health orders and all worshipers will need to wear face masks and practice physical distancing.

LA County officials said they “reluctantly” sued the church in August after they tried to work with church leaders to come into compliance with the health order.

A Superior Court judge declined to issue a temporary restraining last month and the church continued to hold its services despite the ongoing legal proceedings.

Last month, church pastor John MacArthur opened his Sunday service with the message, “I’m so happy to welcome you to the Grace Community Church peaceful protest.”

A Ninth Circuit panel said it would not issue a restraining order and sent the matter back to the state court.

Beckloff did not issue sanctions against the church at a previous hearing, but did order the church to allow county health officials to enter the church premises to make sure they are complying with the local and state health orders.

Church attorney Jenna Ellis wrote on Twitter, “Judge allows LA county to DENY religious freedom” to Grace Community Church and ban indoor services.

In a statement, the church’s attorney Charles LiMandri said in a statement they were disappointed in the ruling because the court did not apply the strict scrutiny analysis to the government order.

“The court also did not properly consider the medical and scientific evidence that the current number of people with serious COVID-19 symptoms no longer justifies a shuttering of the churches.”

LiMandri went on to say that the court has treated churches like “second-class citizens compared to the tens of thousands of protesters.”

Ellis said in a statement, “The County’s argument was basically ‘because we can,’ which is the very definition of tyranny.”

MacArthur called the ruling “inexplicable” and that a small amount of Californians should not trump the rights of churches.

Since the onset of the pandemic LA County has reported 251,000 confirmed infections and over 6,000 deaths…Original Source

Trump Revels in Packed Mich. Crowd at Airport Rally

(Headline USA) President Donald Trump focused his attention on his Democrat rival at a rally in battleground Michigan Thursday.

But issues related to the coronavirus followed him as he faced new pushback from leftist local officials worried about the growing size of his rallies and his campaign’s repeated flouting of public health guidelines intended to halt the COVID-19 spread. That includes Michigan’s Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, who raised alarms about Thursday’s event, warning it would make recovery harder.

Trump, however, reveled in the crowd of several thousand, packed shoulder-to-shoulder in a cavernous airport hangar, mostly without masks — with Air Force One on display as his backdrop.

“This is not the crowd of a person who comes in second place,” Trump declared to cheers as he railed against Whitmer for current state restrictions.

“Tell your governor to open up your state!” he demanded, saying Michigan would be better if it “had a governor who knew what the hell she was doing.”

Trump also cleared up some matters raised by Bob Woodward’s book, in which he characterized the president as “downplaying” the threat of the coronavirus as it began to spread. The Left has seized on the theme, claimed Trump has mismanaged the response.

“This wack job that wrote the book, he said, ‘well Trump knew a little bit,'” Trump told the crowd. “They wanted me to come out and scream, ‘people are dying, we’re dying.’ No, no. We did it just the right way. We have to be calm. We don’t want to be crazed lunatics.”

Biden, he claimed, would terminate travel bans Trump has implemented, overwhelming the state “with poorly vetted migrants from jihadist regions” and refugees “from terrorist hot spots around the world.”

And he continued his appeal to suburban voters who turned to Democrats during the 2018 midterms, warning that under a Biden administration, “far left lunatics” would be placed in charge of the federal government and courts and American suburbs would be destroyed.

“Does anyone want to have a member of antifa as a resident of your suburb? I don’t think so,” Trump declared, telling his supporters, “Your vote will save America.”

Trump has resumed an aggressive campaign schedule, despite the ongoing pandemic and amid growing resistance from local leaders who have expressed alarm at his insistence on holding large-scale rallies as Americans continue to get sick and die.

While the rallies so far have been held in open-air airport hangars, they have been drawing thousands of supporters despite local restrictions — many by Democrat governors who are suspected of keeping them in place to depress the economy and harm Trump’s re-election chances.

And the majority of attendees, including in Michigan, have refused to wear masks, even when mandates are in place. Trump has characterized the rallies as “peaceful protests.”

This week, the state of Nevada became the first to scuttle his plans for rallies initially set for Las Vegas and Reno, after the Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority warned a company that planned to host 5,000 people at a private hangar it would be in violation of the governor’s restrictions banning gatherings of more than 50 people and the terms of the company’s lease for the hangar.

“Outrageous!” tweeted Adam Laxalt, Trump’s Nevada campaign co-chair, in response.

In Michigan, Gov. Whitmer did not try to stop the rally, but warned that such events “threaten all that sacrifice that we’ve made.”

“If the rallies are like those he’s held in recent days in other states, with lots of people close together without masks on projecting their voices, I’m concerned about it,” she said Thursday morning.

Michigan currently caps outdoor events at 100 people and mandates that attendees wear masks if they cannot consistently stay 6 feet away from people who are not part of their households. There is an exception, though, for outdoor expressive activities protected by the First Amendment. The governor’s office said people still must maintain distance.

Michigan is a vital Electoral College battleground, which Trump won by only 10,704 votes in 2016, helping him breach the Democrats’ “blue wall.”

Both candidates have been paying frequent visits, with Biden traveling to suburban Detroit on Wednesday to make a direct appeal to blue-collar workers who might have voted Republican four years ago but now regret it.

Trump on Thursday pushed back, accusing Biden of supporting trade deals and policies that led to U.S. job losses.

“Joe Biden devoted his career to offshoring Michigan’s jobs,” Trump said, drawing boos from the crowd. “Biden supported every disastrous globalist sellout for over a half a century.”

Adapted from reporting by Associated Press.

BIDEN: ‘I Hope I Don’t Take the Bait’ in Debate with Trump

(Headline USA) Joe Biden has said he’d “beat the hell out of” President Donald Trump over his comments about women if they were in high school.

But on the debate stage, as opponents for the presidency, it’s a different story.

When Biden and Trump meet in their first presidential debate later this month, Biden says he has one goal: “I hope I don’t take the bait.”

“I hope I don’t get baited into a brawl with this guy, because that’s the only place he’s comfortable,” Biden said Thursday during a fundraiser.

His comments offer a hint at how the former vice president is looking at the upcoming debate on September 29, in Cleveland, Ohio.

Biden has previously said he plans to be a “fact checker” on the debate stage, and hold Trump accountable for any misstatements or falsehoods. But on Thursday night, Biden said that “people know what a liar” Trump is.

“This is a guy who is absolutely tasteless. Completely tasteless. So pointing it out doesn’t do much,” he said.

But Biden acknowledged that he expects the president to “say awful things about me and my family” during the debate to try to get a rise out of him — and the debate is almost certain to feature clashes about the two candidates’ families, as such attacks have been central themes that have already played out on the campaign trail.

The Trump campaign in particular has targeted Biden’s son Hunter for his ties to Chinese and Ukranian companies.

And Biden has displayed anger at events in recent days about a debunked report that Trump called fallen Marines “suckers” and “losers,” speaking about his son Beau, who served in the Delaware Army National Guard. Beau Biden died from brain cancer in 2015.

And Democrats often criticize Trump for the use of his children in government positions and policy negotiations, as well as the financial benefit his family’s business has seen from the presidency.

While Biden said he doesn’t want to get baited by Trump, he did express confidence that “I know how to handle bullies.”

But Biden suggested his strategy in the debate will be focused more on drawing a contrast with Trump on competency and policy, and offering Americans an alternative to the Trump presidency.

“The place he is most uncomfortable is on the facts. The place he’s most uncomfortable is in the area of what he’s going to do. The place he’s most uncomfortable is knowing the policy. He’s one of the most ill-informed presidents substantively that I’ve ever worked with,” Biden said.

Biden added: “Everybody knows who Donald Trump is. I plan to tell them who I am.”

Adapted from reporting by Associated Press.

JUDGES: Trump Can’t Exclude Illegals from Census Count for Redistricting Purposes

0

(Headline USA) Saying the president had exceeded his authority, a panel of three federal judges on Thursday blocked an order from President Donald Trump that tried to exclude people in the country illegally from being counted when congressional districts are redrawn.

The federal judges in New York, in granting an injunction, said the presidential order issued in late July was unlawful.

The judges prohibited Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, whose agency oversees the U.S. Census Bureau, from excluding people in the country illegally when handing in 2020 census figures used to calculate how many congressional seats each state gets.

According to the judges, the presidential order violated laws governing the execution of the once-a-decade census and also the process for redrawing congressional districts known as apportionment by requiring that two sets of numbers be presented — one with the total count and the other minus people living in the country illegally.

The judges said that those in the country illegally qualify as people to be counted in the states they reside. They declined to say whether the order violated the Constitution.

“Throughout the Nation’s history, the figures used to determine the apportionment of Congress — in the language of the current statutes, the ‘total population’ and the ‘whole number of persons’ in each State — have included every person residing in the United States at the time of the census, whether citizen or non-citizen and whether living here with legal status or without,” the judges wrote.

Opponents of the order said it was an effort to suppress the growing political power of Latinos in the U.S. and to discriminate against immigrant communities of color. They also said undocumented residents use the nation’s roads, parks and other public amenities and should be taken into account for any distribution of federal resources.

The lawsuits challenging the presidential order in New York were brought by a coalition of cities, civil rights groups and states led by New York. Because the lawsuits dealt with questions about apportionment, it was heard by a three-judge panel that allows the decision to be appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The judges agreed with the coalition that the order created confusion among undocumented residents over whether they should participate in the 2020 census, deterring participation and jeopardizing the quality of the census data. That harm to the census was a sufficient basis for their ruling and they didn’t need to rely on the speculation that a state would be hurt by possibly losing a congressional seat if people in the country illegally were excluded from apportionment, the judges said.

The head count of every U.S. resident, which which helps determine the distribution of $1.5 trillion in federal funding as well as apportionment, is set to wrap up at the end of September.

“This is the most blatantly unconstitutional act I’ve ever encountered in years litigating the federal government,” Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, one of the groups that challenged the order, said in an interview.

New York Attorney General Letitia James noted that the federal court in New York also had ruled against the Trump administration in its failed attempt to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. That case went to the Supreme Court which blocked the citizenship question from being added.

“The courts have ruled in our favor on every census matter in the last two years and continually rejected President Trump’s unlawful efforts to manipulate the census for political purposes,” James said.

Alabama Congressman Mo Brooks, a Republican, has been litigating in support of keeping illegal immigrants out of the census count for the purposes of redistricting. He was recently deposed by groups opposed to his lawsuit.

“The attorneys who deposed me represented various illegal alien sanctuary parts of the country that hope to gain political power at the expense of Alabama and other law-abiding states,” Brooks said in a statement last month. “I steadfastly defended the Constitutional rights of Alabamians in the face of those who seek to undermine the rights of American citizens in favor of illegal aliens.”

An analysis by Pew Research Center showed that California, Florida and Texas would end up with one less congressional seat if people in the country illegally were excluded from apportionment. Alabama, Minnesota and Ohio would each keep a congressional seat they most likely would have lost if the presidential order were enforced, according to the Pew analysis.

The Commerce Department didn’t respond to an emailed inquiry.

Adapted from reporting by Associated Press.

SELLERS: Complex 9/11 Legacy Still Bound by a Common Thread of Humanity

Editor’s note: Video contains profanity and 9/11 scenes that may upset some.

As a child of the ’80s, I reflect now in disbelief that the assassination of John F. Kennedy preceded me by only 17 and a half years.

Growing up, Nov. 22, 1963 seemed not raw and visceral but already etched into the annals of history.

Adults would ask each other, “Where where you when…”—not, it seemed to me, as a way to reconnect with feelings of shock and grief, but to assert their own stake in a nationally momentous, shared experience.

On the 19th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, my own claim to a historical touchstone seems far more complicated.

While 9/11 undoubtedly shaped the national psyche in deep ways that we continue to grapple with, it is starting to feel like a closed chapter.

It’s an anomaly—like a stray blip on the radar of an air-traffic controller—from which the present day arose in spite, not because of.

To quote radical Islamist Rep. Ilhan Omar, our collective memory of 9/11 recalls simply that “some people did something” on that fateful Tuesday morning.

As we take inventory, yet again, of the attacks’ aftermath, it’s worthwhile to consider some of the many ways America has rapidly evolved since its halcyon pre-9/11 days:

  • Media has numbed us to catastrophe.

The double-edged sword of immediacy has not simply revolutionized the media industry, but also the way we consume information.

And the toll of having unfiltered access to direct sources of news may be greater than we realize.

With distrust and skepticism rightfully on the rise, media bias, misinformation and unabashed gaslighting surprisingly have become even greater problems within our society.

Lacking the ability to channel public sentiment toward a common cause, many journalists have relinquished their sacred pledge to seek the Truth.

Nuance also has been scuttled with the urgent need to make each scoop bigger and more impactful than the last.

The sight of the massive fireballs and the collapse of the Twin Towers in real time led networks to temper the sensationalism with reverence and a sense of ethical duty.

Most viewers, with the exception of firsthand witnesses, were spared the ghastly sight of jumpers—thereby ascribing to the few ‘tastefully’ captured records of their deaths a sort of sublime beauty and symbolic resonance.

By contrast, it was a different kind of horror that viewers encountered in recent footage of race-riots—including the deaths of George Floyd and David Dorn, the latter of which was live-streamed on social media.

The lofty, defiant, heroic clash of man versus fate memorialized by 9/11 victims has yielded to the senseless despair of mankind defending against our own hubris.

On one hand, we are fully aware of the constant state of global turmoil and tragedy, which used to be more localized to the affected community.

On the other hand, in order to cope with the ensuing dread, we train ourselves to shrug it off and compartmentalize it more readily.

But if you enjoy feeling as though all you held dear is plummeting toward an infernal chasm of greed, selfishness and, most of all, ignorance, then perhaps Dorn didn’t die in vain.

  • Terrorism is the new normal.

The great fear of Islamic terrorism was, as former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld famously said, the “unknown unknowns.”

The average American did not wade so deeply into foreign policy as to understand the causes and motives of Al Qaeda, making it an enigma that we trusted our intelligence community to monitor and safeguard us against.

For better or worse, America has since become wiser and more jaded. We long ago learned not to trust the deep state to look out for our best interest.

And—indeed—the greater terrorist fear has become the internal threat to take us down from within.

We now maintain a greater vigilance where once rested complacency. And years of war in the Middle East have brought a better understanding to the masses of the geopolitical dynamics.

In short, while the possibility of our being blindsided by an Islamic sleeper cell still looms constantly, the idea that such an attack might bring the Western world to its knees again seems as anachronistic as Dr. Evil demanding one million dollars in ransom from the United Nations.

  • Political realignments have shaken America’s identity.

President George W. Bush distilled the 9/11 attacks into a simple matter of good guys and evil-doers who aligned on a moral axis based on their support for American/occidental interests.

Of course, there were those at the time who criticized the ‘Dubya Doctrine’ as neo-imperialism. One of them happened to be his eventual Republican successor, Donald Trump, who saw the boondoggle of war in Iraq as a bad investment.

Still, in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, the two opposing parties reliably converged in support of the president, much as they had done for his father in the previous Iraq war.

Only libertarians were left futilely to raise the red flags about cost and privacy—and to gripe about how Democrats and Republicans were merely offering the false illusion of choice.

We now lament those days, when the reflexive response was to rally ’round the flag, given that even the flag itself has become a symbol of controversy for the Left.

President Trump, meanwhile, receives more support from Osama bin Laden’s niece than he does from Bush in his ongoing struggle to preserve and defend traditional American values.

And, suffice it to say, any sort of national crisis, moving forward, is bound to drive the two sides farther to their edges, determined to inflict more damage on their domestic adversaries than to overcome an outside threat.

Room for Hope

Perversely, it is the act of observing and remembering 9/11—for all the sorrow and uncertainty and loss of innocence it wrought—that still offers me cause for optimism.

No longer is its meaning found in a unifying sense of purpose to defeat a common enemy.

Rather, it is the catharsis that it elicits—an overwhelming sense of empathy and compassion, and the awareness of a single common thread of humanity—that I find myself needing to be reminded of.

Knowing the outcome in retrospect, we may not have triumphed over evil—it simply found another host—but it’s enough to say we persevered through it together.

Victims’ Families Outraged as NYC Officials Try to CANCEL 9/11 Commemorations

0

(Headline USA) In a year when the coronavirus pandemic has reshaped countless American rituals, even the commemoration of 9/11 could not escape unchanged.

The 19th anniversary of the terror attacks will be marked by dueling ceremonies at the Sept. 11 memorial plaza and a corner near the World Trade Center.

It reflects a divide over the New York City memorial’s decision to suspend a cherished tradition of relatives reading victims’ names in person.

Vice President Mike Pence is expected at both those remembrances in New York, while President Donald Trump and Democratic challenger Joe Biden plan to go to the Flight 93 National Memorial in Pennsylvania.

In New York, the double beams of light that evoke the fallen twin towers were nearly canceled in the name of virus safety, until an uproar restored the tribute.

The Fire Department has cited the virus in urging members to skip observances of the 2001 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people, among them almost 350 firefighters.

Some victims’ relatives say they understand the ground zero observance had to change in a year when so much else has.

Others fear the pandemic is making plain what they have feared was happening unspoken: that the commitment to “Never Forget” is fading.

“It’s another smack in the face,” says Jim Riches, who lost his son Jimmy, a firefighter.

The father is staying home on the anniversary for the first time this year because he doesn’t want to take chances with the coronavirus after a prior illness.

But he feels others should have the option of reciting the names of the dead on the memorial plaza, instead of listening to a recording.

Memorial leaders said they wanted to avoid close contact among readers, who are usually paired at the podium. But to Riches, a retired fire battalion chief and frequent critic of the memorial organization, the decision sounds like an excuse for sidelining the families’ role in commemorating 9/11.

“I wish they wouldn’t forget, but they’re trying to,” he says.

This year’s plans have been a balancing act at the sites where hijacked planes piloted by al-Qaida terrorists crashed on Sept. 11, 2001: New York, the Pentagon and a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

The Flight 93 memorial near Shanksville is trimming its usual 90-minute ceremony, partly by eliminating musical interludes. Memorial spokeswoman Katherine Cordek said victims’ names would be read, but by one person instead of multiple family members.

Military leaders will conduct the Pentagon’s ceremony without victims’ families in attendance, and their loved ones’ names will be recited by a recording, rather than readers on-site.

Victims’ relatives can visit the Pentagon’s memorial in small groups later Friday.

In New York leaders of the National Sept. 11 Memorial & Museum said their plan for a no-reading ceremony would honor both virus precautions and 9/11 families’ attachment to being at ground zero on the anniversary.

But another 9/11-related organization, the Stephen Stiller Tunnel to Towers Foundation, quickly arranged its own simultaneous ceremony a few blocks away, saying victims’ relatives could recite names while keeping a safe distance.

“We need to keep letting America know what happened 19 years ago. And they need to see that emotion of the day, not a recording,” says chairman Frank Siller. He says he may attend both observances to honor the brother he lost, firefighter Stephen.

Meanwhile, Fire Commissioner Daniel Nigro told current firefighters in a memo last month that the department “strongly recommends” members not participate in 9/11 observances.

The department did hold a limited-attendance ceremony Wednesday to add names to a memorial wall recognizing members who died after exposure to toxins unleashed in the wreckage.

Tensions over anniversary plans flared anew when the memorial announced last month it was nixing the Tribute in Light, twin blue beams that shine into the night sky over lower Manhattan.

While there’s no official gathering to view the lights, the memorial cited virus risks to the installation crew.

The cancellation outraged some victims’ relatives, police and fire unions and politicians, who noted that construction sites around the city were deemed safe to reopen months ago.

After the Tunnel to Towers foundation said it would organize the display on its own, Gov. Andrew Cuomo and former Mayor Mike Bloomberg, the memorial’s billionaire chairman, stepped in to keep the memorial-sponsored lights on. (Tunnel to Towers is now stationing lights at the Flight 93 memorial and the Pentagon.)

Memorial President Alice Greenwald later said the organization “should have approached this issue differently.”

Still, the memorial’s moves fanned mistrust among some 9/11 victims’ relatives who wonder how long the name-reading and other observances will continue.

Katismatides, the board member, foresees the ceremony returning to normal next year.

Debra Epps has been to the ground zero ceremony every year. She said it means a lot to her to read names and add a few words in tribute to her brother Christopher, an accountant.

“I will remember my brother, no matter what,” she said.

Barr Delivers Verbal Blow to Dems’ Fraudulent Mail-In Ballot Schemes

0

(Headline USA) U.S. Attorney General William Barr on Thursday delivered a broadside attack on mail-in voting as prone to undue influence and coercion.

Democrat operatives, including the Left’s lead election-stealing attorney, Marc Elias, have been pushing for increased mail-in ballots since even before President Donald Trump declared a national health emergency in March to address the coronavirus pandemic.

Even as evidence shows elections can be safely conducted, with social-distancing techniques and other virus treatments helping ease the monthslong panic, Democrats have continued to double down on the effort to overtax the mail system and delay the election results.

Recent primaries revealed that in many areas—including key swing states that Trump won in 2016—issues such as failed delivery of completed ballots, duplicate ballots and ballots sent to ineligible voters all cast aspersions on the process.

Some blue states, including Pennsylvania and New Jersey, also have seen fraud rings exposed in recent months.

Trump has emphasized that he supports the standard absentee ballot systems states have in place for those with valid reason to use them but opposes an unnecessary over-reliance on it.

Speaking in Arizona, Barr said that mail-in ballots impinge on the historic American tradition of the secret ballot.

Barr was in Phoenix to announce a crackdown on methamphetamine trafficking but spent the majority of his time answering questions unrelated to the drug busts.

Barr focused on efforts by some states, including Nevada, to mail ballots to all registered voters as the coronavirus pandemic creates fears about in-person voting.

The Trump campaign is suing to block a law passed by the Democratic-led Legislature in July.

Barr laid out the traditional American voting method that he said was at risk—one filled with checks and balances and the historic secret ballot. Americans go to a polling place, identify themselves, go into a private voting booth and mark a ballot.

“Those measures have been developed over the years precisely because of concerns of fraud and coercion,” Barr said.

“And you can’t sell your vote, no one can intimidate you, no one can buy your vote. And it reduces radically the risk of fraud when you have a secret ballot that’s organized the way we’ve had it organized.”

Barr said voting by mail eliminates all those protections.

“There’s no more secret vote, there’s no secret vote,” he said. “Your name is associated with a particular ballot. The government and the people involved can find out and know how you voted. And it opens up the door to coercion.”

He went on to say voters could be coerced to cast their vote a certain way if they get a mail ballot, and said there might be situations where someone in a nursing home is persuaded to let others fill out their ballot.

“And finally the fact that ballots are mailed out profligately the way they would be, many of them misdirected we know because of inaccuracy of voting lists, there are going to be ballots floating around and collected,” he said.

Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, a Democrat who is the state’s chief election officer, slammed Barr for attacking what is a “decades-long history of secure and reliable ballot-by-mail procedures” in Arizona.

“It is a shame that high-ranking officials are sowing doubt in our democratic institutions.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Ga. Tech Backs Off Policy Preventing MLK Niece from Speaking to Pro-Lifers

Georgia Tech changed its policies on campus speech after being sued for not allowing Alveda King, the niece of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., to visit campus to speak for Students for Life.

The public university also will pay $50,000 for damages and attorney fees, Alliance Defending Freedom reported

Students for Life were denied funding for bringing Alveda King to campus due to her “inherently religious” background. 

In response, Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian legal organization, filed a lawsuit in April naming Georgia Tech leaders, its student government association, and the state’s Board of Regents.

“Public universities are supposed to welcome diverse viewpoints and can’t treat some student groups worse than others simply because they disagree with what the students have to say,” said ADF attorney Caleb Dalton. 

“Georgia Tech’s previous policy allowed discrimination against Ms. King because she was accused of leading an ‘inherently religious’ life,’ he continued. “Under such a standard, MLK himself would not be welcome on campus.”

The university now vows to review its policies so that all students are treated fairly, regardless of political viewpoints. 

“The First Amendment guarantees of free expression are an essential cornerstone to the advancement of knowledge,” the school said in a statement. “Georgia Tech is pleased with the policies, as they reflect our commitment to upholding these important principles.” 

Tyson Langhofer, director of the ADF Center for Academic Freedom, said the lawsuit was aimed in part at discouraging schools from pushing an anti-free-speech agenda on students that they may take into future leadership roles.

“Thankfully, Georgia Tech has shown its renewed commitment to these principles by taking quick corrective action to revise their policies so that all student organizations are treated fairly, regardless of political or religious views,” Langhofer said. “We hope that other universities around the country will ensure their policies meet constitutional muster without the need for a lawsuit.”

The lawsuit settled as President Donald Trump’s administration moves forward with policies that threaten funding cuts to universities that violate students’ religious liberties.

Revived Clinton-Era Law Could Force Universities to Charge All Students In-State Tuition

A Clinton-era immigration law could cut tuition for students all over the nation, if President Donald Trump enforces its provisions, The College Fix reported.

If a state lets illegal aliens pay in-state tuition for attendance to public universities, then they must also let all American citizens, whether in-state or not, receive the same benefit, according to the “Illegal Immigration Reform and Responsibility Act of 1996.”

The Clinton-era law states:

“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible on the basis of residence within a State (or a political subdivision) for any postsecondary education benefit unless a citizen or national of the United States is eligible for such a benefit (in no less an amount, duration, and scope) without regard to whether the citizen or national is such a resident.”

According to an attorney who formerly worked at the Department of Justice, the government has not been carrying out the provision.

Heritage Foundation senior legal fellow Hans von Spakovsky says that Trump can uphold this law. 

“If the DOJ actually enforced the law those states would lose, they’d be forced to either stop providing in-state tuition to illegal immigrants or get rid of increased tuition for U.S. citizens,” von Spakovsky said.

The numbers concerning tuition for illegal immigrants are staggering: 19 states offer aliens the in-state discount that can range from $10,000 to $30,000.

When the statute was challenged in 2007, a federal judge ruled that students could not sue states or universities for not providing in-state tuition to out-of-state students when they provided it for non-U.S. citizens.

Moreover, universities have attempted to get around the law by saying that they won’t check a student’s citizenship and will merely require that the applicant be a resident of the state for a certain amount of time.

But since “it just says you have to provide in-state tuition to all U.S. citizens” if you provide in-state tuition to illegal immigrants, this strategy is not viable.

“It’s unfair that citizens have to pay out of state tuition when illegal immigrants do not,” von Spakovsky said.

If Trump directs the Department of Justice to acknowledge and administer the provision, then it could mean massive tuition breaks for many students. 

Judicial Watch Sues University of Delaware for Joe Biden’s Sealed Senate Records

Judicial Watch is moving forward with a lawsuit to obtain the Senate records of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.

It follows a decision by Delaware Attorney General Kathleen Jennings to deny the group’s prior Freedom of Information Act request.

“Delaware is hiding, in violation of law, Joe Biden’s Senate records,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

“It is time for the University of Delaware to stop protecting Joe Biden and follow Delaware law, which requires them to provide public access to these public records,” he said.

The lawsuit may yield information about Biden’s former staffer Tara Reade, who has accused Biden of sexually assaulting her in 1993. She said that the University of Delaware may have access to the records about the accusation.

The records also contain communications between Biden and foreign leaders—specifically Russian President Vladimir Putin, whom Biden said he spoke with while he was a senator.

In the opinion rejecting the request, the Delaware Superior Court said the documents about Biden’s tenure in the Senate are not “public records” because they are not kept with public funds, JW reported in a press release.

Yet, the University of Delaware, a taxpayer-funded institution, supports the record-keeping project.

Attorneys for Judicial Watch argue in the lawsuit that public funding necessarily supports record-keeping at the University of Delaware’s library, since “the State of Delaware provides the University with approximately $120 million each year through an appropriation in the state budget.”

They also note that the state’s justice department did not justify its assertion that public funds do not pay for the housing of Biden’s Senate records.

JW said “archival storage space and professional staff members’ time are things of value that it can be inferred are paid for with public funds.”

In the lawsuit, JW asked for information about university employees “who maintain the Senatorial Papers whose salaries, it can be inferred, are paid with State funds.”

The Daily Caller News Foundation joined the lawsuit as a plaintiff.

“Anyone running for public office, especially our highest office, should expect public scrutiny of their record, especially of their public record,” said Neil Patel, president of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

“It’s amazing that Joe Biden’s public papers are still sealed and nobody else in the press seems to care,” he said. “We care and we are going to fight to get these records opened up as they should be.”

JW filed the FOIA lawsuit on July 2, 2020 in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware after Daily Caller’s FOIA request, which was submitted on April 30, 2020, was denied.

Daily Caller initially asked for agreements regarding “the storage of more than 1,850 boxes of archival records and 415 gigabytes of electronic records from Joe Biden’s senate career from 1973 through 2009.”

The group asked for documents of the communications between Biden or any of Biden’s associates and the staff at the University of Delaware regarding his Senate records.

Finally, Daily Caller sought “logs” or “sign-in sheets” to see who had accessed Biden’s Senate records since 2010.