FBI Raids CCP Shop in NYC Chinatown ‘Conducting’ Secret ‘Police Operations’

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The FBI raided a New York Chinatown building late last year in a mission to stop a secretive CCP police force accused of collecting intelligence on Chinese immigrants and harassing those who opposed the dictatorial communist regime.

An office on the third floor of the six-story building that was raided housed a Chinese outpost that, according to  federal agents, was conducting police operations without jurisdiction or diplomatic approval from the U.S. officials, according to the Daily Wire.

The FBI counterintelligence agents conducted the raid in conjunction with the U.S. attorney’s office in Brooklyn, as a way to stop communist China’s global efforts — called “Operation Fox Hunt” — to surveil its citizens and hunt down those who oppose the regime overseas and force them to go back to China.

When confronted with the fact that it has police centers all around the world, CCP officials claimed that the centers were not designed to spy on Chinese people overseas and crush dissidents, but rather offices where volunteers help people obtain things like a driver’s license.

The New York Times reported that numerous accounts from inside China showed that Chinese officials bragged about how the country’s “overseas police service centers” are effective. The Times reported that many of these reports were deleted from China’s internet.

It is even worse in Europe. In Hungary, Chinese communists didn’t even try to cover their motives, until one Hungarian lawmaker pointed out that there was a police center that was openly called “Qingtian Police Overseas Service Station.” Only after the lawmaker pointed that out, the communists took down the signs.

“The Chinese government wants to have more influence and to extend their transnational policing,” Chen Yen-ting, a Taiwan-based researcher, said.

“It’s a long-arm power to show their own citizens inside China that their government is so strong. We have the power to reach globally, and even if you go out, you’re still under our control.”

House GOP Pushes Bill to Ban Feds from Colluding w/ Big Tech to Censor Americans

(The Center Square) – Leading Republican lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives filed new legislation that would ban federal employees from working with big tech companies to censor Americans.

The bill comes as ongoing reports show that federal law enforcement and the White House have regularly communicated with social media companies like Facebook and Twitter, pressuring the companies to remove posts and accounts for a range of issues, including questioning the COVID-19 vaccine.

“The collusion between bureaucrats and Big Tech has gone on for far too long. Government agencies shouldn’t censor the free speech of Americans,” said Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who is helping lead the effort. “The Protecting Speech from Government Interference Act is an important first step toward transparency and accountability for Biden’s bureaucrats and Big Tech.”

The bill would prevent federal officials from using their influence or authority, “including contracting, grantmaking, rulemaking, licensing, permitting, investigatory, or enforcement actions – to promote the censorship of lawful speech or advocate that a third party or private entity censor speech.”

For violators, the bill uses the same penalties for violations of the Hatch Act, which can include removal, fines, or a reduction in pay. The bill singles out high level officials, banning them from personally advocating for this kind of censorship.

The House now has a Republicans majority, emboldening those lawmakers. However, their legislation will still have a tough time in the divided Senate and faces a potential veto from President Joe Biden.

That legislation, though, can give a window into what action Republicans will take if they win the White House and Senate in 2024.

“The actions taken by the Biden administration to pressure Big Tech to censor content online are an attack on our fundamental right to free speech,” said Energy and Commerce Committee Chair McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., who is also helping lead the effort. “It’s time for this behavior to end.”

The legislative proposal comes alongside an investigation from the House Oversight Committee, which is digging into federal law enforcement and the White House’s work with these companies.

One particular instance of censorship has rallied opposition to tech companies controlling information on their platforms.

Billionaire and new owner of Twitter Elon Musk has authorized a series of document dumps called the “Twitter files” which helped expose more details about the tech companies’ collusion with federal law enforcement and the Democratic Party behind the scenes to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election.

So far, the “Twitter files” have featured most notably internal communications between top Twitter executives, the Biden administration and federal law enforcement.

Last year, the Oversight Committee launched an investigation into the Department of Homeland Security after news broke that Facebook had an online portal where federal law enforcement could flag content that it wanted removed. The Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency reportedly relied heavily on the portal, flagging posts to be removed.

“This effort began after CISA partnered with left-leaning organizations and Big Tech companies to launch the Election Integrity Partnership,” House Oversight Committee said in its letter to Department of Homeland Security Secretary ​​Alejandro Mayorkas. “The EIP provides an online complaint-processing platform that permits groups – including the Democratic National Committee on at least four occasions – to submit ‘tickets’ reporting narratives they flagged for concerns.

“‘Tickets’ were frequently resolved by taking one of several actions: 1) banning the user from posting his or her lawful speech or deplatforming the individual entirely, 2) algorithmically restricting the reach of the speech on the platform, or 3) adding other information, such as a warning label, to the post alerting users to the post’s disfavored status,” the letter added.

The White House has downplayed the portal, but former Press Secretary Jen Psaki admitted the White House had a hand in regulating information.

“We are in regular touch with the social media platforms and those engagements typically happen through members of our senior staff and also members of our COVID-19 team, given as Dr. Murthy conveyed, this is a big issue of misinformation specifically on the pandemic,” Psaki said at a press briefing in July of last year, referring to the U.S. surgeon general, Dr. Vivk Murthy.

Trump Rips Biden on Missing Visitor Logs from Classified Doc Stash House

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Former President Donald Trump delivered a round of blistering criticism over the reported absence of visitor logs at the home where embattled President Joe Biden stashed troves of classified documents.

Biden has spent a huge chunk of his presidency — 40% of it — both at his Wilmington and Rehoboth Beach vacation homes, according to the Gateway Pundit. White House lawyers have conceded there were no visitor logs at Biden’s Wilmington enclave.

“The White House just announced that there are no LOGS or information of any kind on visitors to the Wilmington house and flimsy, unlocked, and unsecured, but now very famous, garage. Maybe they are smarter than we think!” Trump wrote.

When it was revealed that Biden was storing classified documents at one of his residences’ garages in Wilmington, Republicans from Congress called for the White House to release visitor logs of Biden’s homes, but until Monday, the White House refused to say if such information would be divulged, BBC News reported.

“President Biden’s mishandling of classified materials raises the issue of whether he has jeopardized our national security,” Republican House Oversight Chairman James Comer wrote in a letter to the White House over the weekend. “Without a list of individuals who have visited his residence, the American people will never know who had access to these highly sensitive documents.”

The White House on Monday changed its tune, claiming it was not standard practice to track who visits the private homes of presidents, and that no such visitor logs existed.

“Like every president across decades of modern history, his personal residence is personal,” yammered Ian Sams, spokesperson for the White House counsel, defending Biden’s actions.

The shelf-life of White House excuses could be limited by outside factors that ultimately reveal an insight of who has been visiting the home where Biden had stashed classified documents in a garage.

The Secret Service, which maintains a permanent presence at Biden’s homes in Wilmington and Rehoboth Beach, screens visitors before they enter, according to BBC News. While the agency doesn’t maintain a log, it puts eyes on everyone who enters.

SELLERS: As BLM Tries to Gin Up More Riots, Has Race Card Finally Lost Its Potency?

(Ben Sellers, Headline USA) I visited New Orleans recently for the funeral of a friend and, against my better judgment, got a hotel not far from the French Quarter so I could honor my buddy fittingly with a night of Bacchanalian revelry.

Fortunately for me, the reports of the city’s top tourist spot being overrun with crime appeared to be somewhat exagerrated. Having spent a year living on the bayou, I knew well enough where not to wander alone in the wee hours when visiting the Big Easy.

That’s not to say I didn’t encounter a few shady situations that, but for my good fortune, might have ended worse.

While ambling up Bourbon Street, I happened to drift just past the commercial area and into a more residential (read: darkly lit) section, where I stopped to get my bearings.

Within a few minutes, a red SUV with tinted windows pulled up, and the driver—a black woman in her 20s or 30s—beckoned me over.

I got closer but still maintained a healthy distance to find out what she wanted. I could see at least two other people in the car but could not make out what the person in the back seat looked like.

The driver said something like “What are you looking for?”

“I’m good,” I replied, while trying to scope out the situation. “Do you need something?”

I continued to rebuff her entreaties to get closer, unsure what I might be walking into.

She perceived that I was trying to see what was happening in the back seat.

“It’s a woman,” she tried to reassure me.

Then, out of the blue, “Quit being racist,” she chided.

With a jolt, I was released from whatever politesse had forced me to continue engaging with her. Instantly, she confirmed for me that this was a situation I had no business being involved with, regardless of what her yet-unknown motive was.

“The lady doth protest too much, methinks,” went my inner monologue, which speaks only in Shakespearean soliloquy.

Without another word, I began walking briskly back in the other direction, toward the bright lights.

A DREAM DEFERRED

Although New Orleans has largely remained its quirky, moderately unhinged self in the intervening years since I moved away, this was a moment unlike any I’d ever encountered.

To be personally confronted by such a baseless attack—normally confined only to the safe-haven of a screen and an anonymous user-name—underscored for me the paradigmatic shift in race-relations that has occurred over the past few years.

Before, “racism” was always a conversation-ender. It was the wild card for the Left to predictably pull out in a losing debate.

And, in that context, it came to be even something of a badge of honor to have reduced one’s intellectual sparring partner to such a cheap and clichéd parlor trick—or perhaps a tell-tale sign that one’s sparring partner was not so intellectual after all.

In that sense, it was weaponized long ago. But this encounter was different.

To see the race card played with such obvious design for malfeasance—in a situation where the intent was clearly trying to induce me to act against my interest—brought it outside of the abstract and theoretical world and made it dangerous.

Truly, we have reached the moment in time where the dream of Dr. Martin Luther King, so justly honored today for his civil-rights advocacy, has become a nightmare.

Instead of sitting down together at the table of brotherhood, King’s principles of passive resistance have been distorted into a bizarre justification by powerful and corrupt leaders like New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell not to enforce the laws that keep our society running.

QUEEN OF MEAN

Two other recent examples stand out, not involving me personally, but involving the reckless abuse of racial guilt and good-will to escalate rather than ease tensions.

The first is the recently proposed bill by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, that would effectively make it a crime for any white person to criticize a nonwhite person.

The so-called Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023 would broadly classify antagonistic comments “between two or more persons” as a conspiracy—even on social media—and also seeks to designate it a hate crime.

On its face, the proposal is as absurd as it is on-brand for the preposterous Jackson Lee, who is more than happy to antagonize others.

“I’m a queen and I demand to be treated like a queen!” she reportedly said once, according to the Daily Mail. And that was her being polite.

In 2014, she was voted the “meanest” member of Congress by The Washingtonian magazine, the Houston Chronicle reported.

After coercing an airline to give her a first-class seat in 2017, leaving another hapless passenger seatless, Lee offered no apology.

“Since this was not any fault of mine, the way the individual continued to act appeared to be, upon reflection, because I was an African American woman, seemingly an easy target along with the African American flight attendant who was very, very nice,” Lee wrote on Facebook.

THE BLM GAME

Another recent example to follow this familiar pattern is the unfortunate—but avoidable—death of 31-year-old Keenan Anderson on Jan. 3 while in custody of Los Angeles police.

Anderson, an English teacher in the Washington, D.C., area, reportedly was in L.A. visiting family for the holidays. Among his cousins is Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrice Cullors.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Patrisse Cullors (@osopepatrisse)

According to witness accounts, Anderson was responsible for causing an accident and subsequently appeared to behave erratically, walking in the middle of the road, then briefly engaging police before trying to flee the scene.

During the conversation, he spoke incoherently about somebody trying to “add stuff” to his car.

After he was subdued, he yelled “They’re trying to George Floyd me!” and proceeded to escalate the situation.

The end result was that Anderson was hit with a Taser, causing him to suffer cardiac arrest.

LAPD released a video with radio dispatch and body-cam footage after Cullors became involved.

KNOW WHEN TO WALK AWAY

Will Cullors, who has considerably diminished the credibility of BLM with her own financial scandals, succeed in creating more public outrage?

Will Anderson’s own stated belief that he might become another George Floyd be fulfilled with another martyrdom?

To me, it seems unlikely.

Although leftist media has pushed out the narrative in its echo-chamber that he should be referred to as “Black English teacher” instead of “hit-and-run drug-abuser,” it is clear that Anderson reaped the consequences of his own actions.

There is a time to resist and a time to cooperate. For too long, reasonable Americans have been held hostage by the threat of the latter.

And they are now weighing the third option, as I did in my Bourbon Street encounter, to simply walk away.

For the shrinking number of black Americans who do still believe the specter or racism continues to define our history, clouding every aspect of our being, know that the danger is very real—not of whites rising up to oppress and enslave anyone, but that those whose attention you so desperately crave will soon stop listening altogether.

Ben Sellers is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/realbensellers.

FBI Repeats Tone-Deaf Tribute to MLK Jr.

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) The FBI stuck to its annual Martin Luther King Jr. Day tradition of paying tribute to the civil rights leader, despite the bureau’s well-documented history of spying on, harassing and blackmailing King—and possibly having a hand in his assassination.

As it does each MLK Day, the FBI tweeted a tribute to King on Monday. The tweet was met with ridicule by hundreds of people pointing out the FBI’s misdeeds against King.

The FBI’s surveillance and harassment of King was revealed in the 1970s by the congressional Church Committee’s investigation—a probe into federal security agencies that House Republicans are planning to conduct again.

According to records obtained by the Church Committee, the FBI justified its surveillance of King due to the civil rights movement’s possible connections to communism.

After King’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech, then-FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover told his agents, “We must mark him now, if we have not done so before, as the most dangerous Negro of the future in this Nation from the standpoint of communism, the Negro, and national security.”

Then-Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy approved Hoover’s requests to surveil King, and the FBI proceeded to place wiretaps and bugs in his hotel rooms when he traveled.

Transcripts from the surveillance on King are sealed under judicial order until 2027, but their contents are said to be an open secret.

“The telephone taps largely recorded King thinking out loud, planning the civil rights movement, weighing tactics and strategies. The hotel bugs sometimes picked up the sounds of late-night parties that ended in the unmistakable sounds of sex,” wrote journalist Tim Weiner in Enemies: A History of the FBI.

The Church Committee discovered that the FBI used its surveillance footage of King to blackmail him. Bill Sullivan, who was the FBI’s chief of intelligence, sent the sex tapes along with a “poison pen” letter to King’s family in November 1964, urging him to commit suicide.

“King, look into your heart. You know you are a complete fraud … Lend your sexually psychotic ear to the enclosure. You will find yourself and in all your dirt, filth, evil and moronic talk exposed on the record for all time,” the leader read. “There is but one way out for you. You better take it before your filthy, abnormal, fraudulent self is bared to the nation.”

King was assassinated several years later on April 4, 1968.

Prosecutors blamed a lone gunman, James Earl Ray, for the assassination. Ray pleaded guilty on the advice of his attorney to avoid the death penalty, but he spent the rest of his life in prison declaring his innocence.

King’s widow Coretta Scott King and the couple’s children also suspected a wider conspiracy. In 1999, they won a wrongful death lawsuit against Loyd Jowers and “other unknown co-conspirators,” including government agencies.

“The jury in Memphis declared Mr. Jowers liable in Dr. King’s death for having purportedly hired a now-dead Memphis police officer, as part of a vast conspiracy, to kill Dr. King,” the New York Times reported in 1999. “It also found that unnamed others, including government agencies, had been involved, in effect accepting the plaintiffs’ contention that James Earl Ray was innocent, despite his guilty plea.”

William Pepper, who represented the King family in the civil trial, maintains that Ray was framed by the FBI, the CIA, the military, the Memphis police and organized crime figures from New Orleans and Memphis. He published a book on his findings in 2018 entitled The Plot to Kill King: The Truth Behind the Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Yosemite National Park Reinstates Indoor Mask Mandate

(Headline USA) Yosemite National Park in California announced this week that it would be reinstating an indoor mask mandate following an uptick in COVID-19 cases in the region, according to the New York Post.

“Due to the high COVID-19 community level, mask wearing is now required for all people when entering federal buildings and public transportation in Yosemite National Park, regardless of vaccination status,” an Instagram post by Yosemite National Park said.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Yosemite National Park (@yosemitenps)

Critics blasted the national park service online for failing to “follow the science.”

“People just need to stop obeying this crap,” wrote Twitter user Joe Gregory.

“Masks do little to nothing and multiple data points prove they are ineffective along with real world examples,” he continued. “Look at how well it’s worked for China for example. This virus is a part of our genome now.”

Mariposa County, which is one county in which the park is located, has 51 total cases of COVID-19, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Though no city has brought back its indoor mask mandate, plenty of other leftist institutions have been quick to reintroduce them over the past several weeks.

In Boston and Philadelphia, for example, public school students were required to wear face masks upon returning to the classroom after the holidays.

The University of Massachusetts Boston also reinstated its mask mandate this month, noting that it applies to everyone, regardless of vaccination status.

“Our mask requirement applies to all individuals regardless of vaccination status and the requirement applies in all indoor settings (including campus shuttles) as well as in crowded outdoor settings,” school officials said.

Los Angeles County considered reinstating its indoor mask mandate in December, but ultimately decided against it, likely fearing the public backlash that would have occurred.

“Given both the increases in hospitalizations and the lack of certainty in the winter trajectory for COVID-19, continuing some common-sense mitigation strategies that we know work to limit transmission and illness, including masking and being up to date on vaccines and boosters, remains a very sensible approach,” the county’s public health director Barbara Ferrer said at the time.

NYC Mayor Eric Adams Visits Southern Border, Acknowledges ‘Crisis’

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) During a weekend visit to El Paso, Texas, New York City Mayor Eric Adams acknowledged that the open-border policies promoted by his fellow Democrats have resulted in a major crisis, the impacts of which are being felt nationwide, Fox News reported.

Per Adams, he and El Paso Mayor Oscar Leeser were “on the front lines, and we need federal support,” Adams alluding to the mass influx of illegal immigrants headed to New York City.

It is not the first time Adams has complained about the costly influx of illegals overrunning the Big Apple. Several governors—including some in blue states—have been busing their new arrivals to the sanctuaty city, much to Adams’s chagrin.

Adams’s trek follows other high-profile border visits, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom and President Joe Biden, who recently visited the border for the first time ever in his official capacity, although the illegal immigrants were cleared away prior to his visit.

But many—including Texas Gov. Greg Abbott—condemned Biden’s photo-op as too-little, too-late after allowing millions of illegal crossings over a two-year span.

Adams appeared to concur with the Republican governor during a press conference in El Paso.

“Our cities are being undermined,” he said. “We don’t deserve this. Migrants don’t deserve this and the people who live in the cities don’t deserve this …There is no more room in New York.”

He later added that the influx of migrants could cost New York City as much as $2 billion.

Alongside his visit to the border, Adams released a statement noting that illegal immigration is causing major problems in New York City.

“We are now seeing more people arrive than we have ever seen—averaging over 400 people each day this last week, with 835 asylum seekers arriving on one single day alone, the largest single-day arrival we’ve seen to date,” Adams wrote.

“All this is pushing New York City to the brink,” he said.

Adams noted the Left’s that commitment to open migration has put his city in a bad spot.

“We are at our breaking point,” he said. “Based off our projections, we anticipate being unable to continue sheltering arriving asylum seekers on our own and have submitted an emergency mutual aid request to the State of New York beginning this weekend.”

Dems Turn on Biden over Classified Docs Scandal

(Headline USA) Democrats lashed out at President Joe Biden over news that he illegally stored classified documents from the Obama presidency in his Washington, D.C. think tank and Delaware home.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., one of the leftist members of the “Squad,” said last week that she was “glad” Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed a special counsel to investigate Biden’s mishandling of classified documents.

“Any time there is a deviance in regard to security protocols, that should be taken serious, it should be investigated,” she told MSNBC.

Rep. John Garamendi, D-Calif., agreed, calling Biden’s scandal an “embarrassment.”

“We have a special counsel in place. The documents and the whole issue is before the special counsel and the investigations will go forward with regard to these classified documents that were found,” Garamendi said when asked what more the Justice Department could do to hold Biden accountable. 

“And it’s an embarrassment, no doubt about it,” Garamendi added. “Is there more to it? I doubt it, but we’ll find out from the special counsel as he goes about his business.”

Retiring Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., also described Biden’s scandal as “embarrassing.”

“It’s certainly embarrassing, right?” she told NBC News. “They don’t think it’s the right thing and they have been moving to correct it, working with the Department of Justice, working with everyone involved with the [National] Archives,” she said of the Biden administration. “And so from my perspective, you know, it’s one of those moments that obviously they wish hadn’t happened.”

Even Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said he would support a congressional probe into Biden’s missing classified documents to determine whether “there was harm to national security.”

“I still would like to see Congress do its own assessment of — and receive an assessment from — the intelligence community of whether there was an exposure to others of these documents,” Schiff said.

Texas Brewery Cancels Anti-Censorship Event Featuring Kyle Rittenhouse

(Headline USA) A Texas brewery canceled an event featuring Kyle Rittenhouse last week, claiming the anti-censorship rally violated its values.

Southern Star Brewing Company in Conroe, Texas, announced on Friday that it would no longer allow the “Rally Against Censorship,” which was supposed to take place on Jan. 26, to meet at its venue.

“Southern star brewery is an apolitical organization. But we feel that this event doesn’t reflect our own values and we could not in good faith continue to rent our space for the event on 1/26. We don’t do rallies, we make beer for people who like beer,” the brewery said.

Rittenhouse said the brewery’s decision was “disappointing” and pushed back on the notion that the rally is “political.”

“It’s really disappointing to see that places continue to censor me and not allow my voice and many other voices to be heard because they bend to the woke crowd. I’ll keep you guys updated on the event on the 26th that I was supposed to speak at,” he wrote on Twitter.

“I don’t support companies who don’t support the first amendment,” Rittenhouse added in another tweet.

Other conservatives also blasted the brewery, pointing out that by canceling Rittenhouse’s event, they had chosen a side.

“Nothing says apolitical like picking a side,” wrote journalist James Dunn.

Another user asked, “What specifically about this event doesn’t reflect your values?”

Conservative John Willow joked that Southern Star should move to a state that better reflects their values.

But Southern Star’s management doubled down on the decision to cancel the event this week.

“It’s been kind of a shitstorm, but now I’m more certain than ever that I made the right decision,” CEO Dave Fougeron said. “Our place is super inclusive. We are super pro-veteran, super pro-law enforcement. We’re trying to be good people in the community. It’s crazy that we’re getting threats from people.”

Schumer Backs Biden’s Pick for FAA Head Despite Airline Chaos, Corruption Probe

(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer announced that he would push to confirm President Joe Biden’s nomination for the head of the FAA, Phillip Washington, despite congressional hesitation over corruption and Biden’s history of appointing officials too comfortable with the big airlines.

Schumer, a Democrat, expressed impatience while discussing the nomination on Sunday, according to Axios.

“There is no doubt about it: it’s time to clear the runway for President Biden’s choice for FAA Administrator, Phil Washington,” Schumer said. “This agency needs a leader confirmed by the Senate immediately. I intend to break this logjam, work to hold a hearing for Mr. Washington, where he can detail his experience.”

Schumer’s lack of patience comes after the last Senate rejected Washington’s nomination.

The Commerce committee, charged with initially vetting FAA nominees, hesitated because Washington had been named in a criminal search warrant, according to Axios. The warrant was served in an investigation on corruption, and Washington was named in his capacity as the head of an airport.

Biden renominated Washington, even after he had been implicated in the LA scandal where “investigators are seeking information about possible favoritism in how the LA Metro awarded contracts,” Axios reported.

Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., a Republican on the Commerce panel said Washington’s nomination “should be dead.”

Schumer did not comment on the concerns about corruption regarding Washington, only that he wished to have a nomination so that Washington “can answer questions and then work towards a speedy Senate confirmation.”

Schumer did mention the airline crisis, but he did not mention how Biden’s nominees dealt with the crisis nor their potentially corrupt relationships with the airlines.

Biden’s transportation secretary, Pete Buttigieg, habitually ignored requests to regulate airlines leading up to the current crisis. He was begged by Republicans and Democrats to look into the airline’s treatment of customers several times before he suddenly came out against his pet industry.