Davos Elites Preview What Music Will Sound Like in the New World Order

(Ben Sellers, Headline USA) According to the World Economic Forum, the near future promises that we, as a global society ruled by a one-world government will “own nothing and be happy” as we sit down to our daily ration of grubs and crickets, all laced with the latest COVID vaccine while waiting for Al Gore to deliver the nightly Two Minutes Hate address.

If that were not enough to entice the world’s 7 million residents, however, WEF founder Klaus Schwab and the gang took a break from plotting the “Great Reset” on Thursday to offer a glimpse of what the arts might look like in the new world order.

Suffice it to say, it may take some getting used to.

The musical interlude was billed as “Noa’s Ark—Music as a Catalyst for Change” and featured the vocal stylings of Israeli singer–activist Achinoam “Noa” Nini accompanied on guitar by longtime collaborator Gil Dor.

On paper, the two seem to combine a high degree of classical music training and performance accolades—with their online biographies boasting that Noa has “ graced many of the world’s most important and prestigious stages like Carnegie Hall and the White House and has performed for three Popes” (which likely means every pope since 1978).

But in practice, the low-energy set—which featured Noa appearing to perform on an invisible instrument while incanting tonal scales—resembled what one might expect from the open mic night at the Starbucks in Hell.

The true reason for Noa’s appeal may, in fact, be her progressive views on Palestine, as her online bio vaguely hints.

“In addition to her prolific musical activity, Noa is considered Israel’s most prominent cultural advocate of dialogue and co-existence, her ‘Voice of Peace,'” it tells us.

Moreover, the WEF revealed that the two performers were outspoken environmentalists.

“They dedicate their time and creative efforts towards raising awareness of the climate crisis and the plight of the Red Sea corals in particular,” it noted.

Noa’s vocal delivery did, however, evoke other futuristic interpretations of the sort of reductive songwriting that might produce the aural equivalent of molecular gastronomy or Jackson Pollock paintings.

While less stylized, the singing called to mind Albanian opera singer Inva Mula’s memorable turn as the diva Plavalaguna in Luc Besson’s 1997 sci-fi film The Fifth Element.

And that may not be the only way in which Schwab’s vision borrows from Besson’s beloved cult classic.

His beachgoing attire also calls to mind the outfit worn by Ukrainian knockout Milla Jovovich, the movie’s titular star (meaning its title is based on her character) as her character, Leeloo, is introduced after being spliced together in a DNA-based 3-d printer.

Jovovich has since called Jean Paul Gaultier’s wardrobe design—which consisted of little more than a few selectively placed bands of fabric—“a bit embarrasing” due to the unwanted attention that it received.

Schwab, however, was far less modest—because, in the future, evidently, we will wear nothing and be happy.

Ben Sellers is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/realbensellers.

Google Axes 12,000 Jobs as Layoffs Spread Throughout Tech Sector

(Headline USA) Google is laying off 12,000 workers, or about 6% of its workforce, becoming the latest tech company to trim staff as the economic boom that the industry rode during the COVID-19 pandemic ebbed.

CEO Sundar Pichai informed staff Friday at the Silicon Valley giant about the cuts in an email that was also posted on the company’s news blog.

The firings adds to tens of thousands of other job losses recently announced by Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook parent Meta and other tech companies as they tighten their belts amid a darkening outlook for the industry. Just this month, there have been at least 48,000 job cuts announced by major companies in the sector.

“Over the past two years we’ve seen periods of dramatic growth,” Pichai wrote. “To match and fuel that growth, we hired for a different economic reality than the one we face today.”

He said the layoffs reflect a “rigorous review” carried out by Google of its operations.

The jobs being eliminated “cut across Alphabet, product areas, functions, levels and regions,” Pichai said.

In a regulatory filing late last year, the company said that it employed nearly 187,000 people.

Pichai said that Google, founded nearly a quarter of a century ago, was “bound to go through difficult economic cycles.”

“These are important moments to sharpen our focus, reengineer our cost base, and direct our talent and capital to our highest priorities,” he wrote.

There will be job cuts in the U.S. and in other countries, according to Pchai’s letter.

Earlier this week, Microsoft announced 10,000 job cuts, or nearly 5% of its workforce. Amazon has said its cutting 18,000 jobs, although that’s a fraction of its 1.5 million strong workforce. Facebook parent Meta is shedding 11,000 positions, or 13% of its workers, while business software maker Salesforce is laying off about 8,000 employees, or 10% of the total. Twitter CEO Elon Musk has slashed jobs at the company after he acquired it last fall.

Employment in the U.S. has been resilient despite signs of a slowing economy, and there were another 223,000 jobs added in December. Yet the tech sector grew exceptionally fast over the last several years due to increased demand as employees began to work remotely.

CEOs of a number of companies have taken blame for growing too fast, yet those same companies, even after the latest round of job cuts, remain much larger than they were before the economic boom from the pandemic began.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

SCOTUS Investigation Ripped for Failing to ID ‘Dobbs’ Leaker, Blaming COVID

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) The U.S. Supreme Court pleaded ignorance in a statement issued Thursday addressing the findings from a months-long investigation to root out who was responsible for the infamous leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion that overturned Roe.

Despite vowing to find who was responsible for what the justices called “one of the worst breaches of trust in [the court’s] history,” the investigation they ordered has “to date been unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence.”

“The leak was no mere misguided attempt at protest. It was a grave assault on the judicial process,” the justices wrote in their statement concerning the leak investigation.

“The Court immediately and unanimously agreed that the extraordinary betrayal of trust that took place last May warranted a thorough investigation,” they wrote, explaining that the task had been assigned to the Marshal of the Supreme Court and her staff.

“After months of diligent analysis of forensic evidence and interviews of almost 100 employees, the Marshal’s team determined that no further investigation was warranted with respect to many of the “82 employees [who] had access to electronic or hard copies of the draft opinion,” the justices conceded in admitting that their investigation had fizzled.

The investigation found it unlikely that the court’s “information technology (IT) systems were improperly accessed by a person outside the Court,” the report concluded. “After examining the Court’s computer devices, networks, printers, and available call and text logs, investigators have found no forensic evidence indicating who disclosed the draft opinion. They have conducted 126 formal interviews of 97 employees, all of whom denied disclosing the opinion.”

The Marshal’s investigation took a weak stab at trying to cast  COVID as a possible contributing factor that led to the leak.

“The pandemic and resulting expansion of the ability to work from home, as well as gaps in the Court’s security policies, created an environment where it was too easy to remove sensitive information from the building and the Court’s IT networks, increasing the risk of both deliberate and accidental disclosures of Court-sensitive information,” the justices statement informed.

The SCOTUS investigation was castigated in equal parts for not only failing to find the leaker, but also for allowing the justices to sidestep themselves as candidates worthy of investigation.

With Republicans back at the helm of the U.S House, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, is reportedly ready to have the judiciary committee he chairs launch an investigation into the leak and into the flopped Marshal investigation.

That could set up some interesting potentials, according to law professor and legal analyst Jonathan Turley.

“For example, what if the House gave all of those unwilling to testify immunity. They would have to testify under oath (under penalty of perjury),” Turley wrote. “The culprit would have to admit guilt or further increase his or her legal jeopardy with perjury before Congress.”

Biden Snarls over Focus on Classified Docs Scandal, Claims ‘No Regrets’

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) An embittered President Joe Biden on Thursday scolded reporters who were too dense and dumb to understand why he illegally removed, transferred and stored classified documents at unsecured and highly-suspect locations.

During a trip to California to inspect storm damage, and conveniently flee the hurricane-grade scandal brewing in the D.C. swamp, Biden snapped and snarled at reporters for bothering him about the classified documents he stashed from his stint as vice president.

“What quite frankly bugs me is that we have a serious problem here we’re talking about,” Biden rebuked a reporter who asked about the document scandal, as the embattled president tried to refocus on the California storm damage. “We’re talking about what’s going on, and the American people don’t quite understand why you don’t ask me questions about that.”

When the reporter instead asked Biden if he “had any regrets that you did not reveal the existence of the documents back in November before the midterms,” a beleaguered Biden babbled out a lecture and another scolding.

“Hang on, OK? Look, as we found — we found a handful of documents that were failed, were filed in the wrong place,” he reasoned. “We immediately turned them over to the [National] Archives and the Justice Department. We’re fully cooperating and looking forward to getting this resolved quickly.”

California Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has played coy about his intentions to launch a 2024 presidential bid, lurked behind Biden, as the president continued equivocating before pounding the podium and abruptly ending the show.

“I think you’re gonna find there’s nothing there. I have no regrets,” Biden said about his illegally obtained classified documents. “I’m following what the lawyers have told me they want me to do. That’s exactly what we’re doing. There’s no there, there. Thank you.”

Biden’s “no regrets” defiance comes as U.S. House Republicans are conducting multiple investigations into his stashing reams of illegally possessed classified materials in suspect locations. Those include, to date, the Penn Biden Center, which has deep financial ties to mysterious China donors, and the garage of his vacation home, which was easily accessed by his crack-addict son, Hunter, who was heavily involved with myriad shady foreign and domestic business dealings.

Despite mounting criticism over the document scandal, including even in some rare and fleeting slips from a typically compliant mainstream media, Biden reportedly remains on track to officially announce his 2024 campaign shortly after his Feb. 7 State of the Union address.

Matt Gaetz Moves to Abolish the ATF in Response to Controversial New Regulation

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., introduced legislation Wednesday that would abolish the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms immediately after the bill’s enactment.

Gaetz’s legislation follows a controversial rule the ATF introduced last week that requires owners of guns with stabilizing braces to destroy, reconfigure, register, or turn in their firearms to ATF within 120 days. Stabilizing arm braces are accessories installed on pistols and shotguns that allow users to stabilize these firearms against their arms, resulting in more accurate shooting without compromising safety or comfort, and reducing the risk of bruising and other injuries when shooting from one hand.

“House Republicans have the ATF in our crosshairs. The continued existence of the ATF is increasingly unwarranted based on their repeated actions to convert law-abiding citizens into felons,” Gaetz said in a press release. “They must be stopped.”

Gaetz told Fox News that if his law doesn’t gain any traction, he will seek other ways to rein in the ATF.

“If that doesn’t work, we’re going to try defunding the ATF. If that doesn’t work, we’re going to target the individual bureaucrats at the top of the ATF who have exceeded their authority in rulemaking. And if that doesn’t work, we’re going to take a meat cleaver to the statutes that the ATF believes broadly authorize their actions,” he reportedly said,

Meanwhile, the ATF’s new rule is being challenged by a lawsuit from the Second Amendment Foundation.

The lawsuit explains that the ATF recently claimed authority to regulate braced pistols by classifying them as short-barreled rifles, which makes them subject to regulation under the National Firearms Act. The decision to treat braced pistols as rifles reverses a position the ATF had as recently as 2014, when the bureau said in a classification letter that shouldering a pistol with an arm brace does not change the classification of the pistol under federal law.

The Second Amendment Foundation criticized the ATF’s reversal as arbitrary and unlawful.

“The definition of a ‘rifle’ now turns on a bewildering six-factor test. This new definition can be controlled not by the firearm’s objective characteristics, but instead by what ATF agents in D.C. think of a manufacturer’s marketing materials or the firearm’s ‘likely use,’” explained Second Amendment Foundation attorney Chad Flores. “The new rule itself is forced to admit its dramatic result: Under this new definitional regime, ‘a majority of the existing firearms equipped with a stabilizing brace are likely to be classified as rifles.’”

Other plaintiffs in that lawsuit include a disabled combat veteran and injured police officer, both who require stabilizing braces to operate their firearms.

The lawsuit had been stagnant while the ATF finalized its rule, but will now resume.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Secret Service Ready to Spill on Visitors to Biden’s Doc Stash House

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The U.S. Secret Service is ready to offer names of people who visited President Joe Biden’s beach enclave in Delaware where he stashed classified documents, if Congress makes the request.

The White House, however, keeps going along with the narrative that a formal visitor log for the personal residence where classified documents were found simply doesn’t exist, according to Fox News.

Even though it is true that the White House itself did not keep a formal list, the Secret Service does collect information on guests who regularly visited Biden’s home. Whether or not the Secret Service will put one’s name on their list depends on many different factors, including proximity to Biden and the nature of the background check.

“The Secret Service does not maintain visitor logs at the private residences of protectees,” U.S. Secret Service chief of communications Anthony Guglielmi said.

“While the Secret Service does generate law enforcement and criminal justice information records for various individuals who may come into contact with Secret Service protected sites, we are not able to comment further as this speaks to the means and methods of our protective operations.”

The Secret Service is ready to provide available background information on Biden’s residence’s guests of Congress will request it. Biden and the Secret Service have had a contentious relationship in the past, including a notorious rift over whether Biden’s dog bit and injured agents.

Biden has expressed concern about the loyalty of agents over fears that “the Secret Service is full of white ex-cops from the South who tend to be deeply conservative” and “MAGA sympathizers,” according to excerpts of Chris Whipple’s new book The Fight of His Life: Inside Joe Biden’s White House.

According to the book, Biden is reportedly so suspect and paranoid about the Secret Service that he won’t speak freely if agents are within earshot.

Battle Lines Drawn in Congress over Debt Ceiling

(The Center Square) – U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen sent a letter to Congressional leaders Thursday notifying them that the agency has begun taking “extraordinary measures” as the federal government bumps up against its debt limit of just over $31 trillion.

That means Congress has until about June to raise the debt ceiling or potentially default on the U.S. debt obligations for the first time ever.

“First, I have determined that, by reason of the statutory debt limit, I will be unable to fully invest the portion of the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund (CSRDF) not immediately required to pay beneficiaries, and that a ‘debt issuance suspension period’ will begin on Thursday, January 19, 2023, and last through Monday, June 5, 2023,” the letter said.

“I respectfully urge Congress to act promptly to protect the full faith and credit of the United States,” she added.

The Congressional Budget Office recently released budget figures showing that the federal government borrowed $4 billion per day in 2022, which is more than $10,000 per household and on overall deficit of about $1.4 trillion. Pre-pandemic deficits were less than $1 trillion.

Lawmakers can raise the debt limit, but they were hardly able to agree on who should serve as Speaker of the House, raising serious questions about whether they can come together on this issue. Many want to use the opportunity to implement fiscal reforms.

“The debate over our debt ceiling is the perfect example of Washington elites refusing to prioritize your best interests,” said U.S. Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla. “We can’t keep rubber-stamping reckless spending. I’m fighting every day to stop it.”

Republicans also blasted the Biden administration and the recent omnibus spending bill. The White House said earlier this week there will be no negotiations with Republicans on the debt limit.

“Just a few weeks ago, Joe Biden signed a $1.7 trillion spending monstrosity,” said U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio. “And now the White House says it will not negotiate with Republicans over the debt ceiling. They created the problem!”

Experts raised the alarm, arguing this need for yet another debt ceiling increase shows the current unsustainable trajectory of federal debt spending.

“America will hit the $31 trillion debt ceiling today,” said economic expert Stephen Moore. “That’s 120% of our GDP and $246,876 per taxpayer. How can anyone believe this is sustainable?”

Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, cautioned about the consequences of going too far with using the debt ceiling for political purposes.

“The debt ceiling is too important to turn into a game of chicken, and default should never be suggested by those with a fiduciary responsibility to govern the nation,” she said. “Politicians who are rightly worried about the nation’s unsustainable borrowing path should take a hard stance against new borrowing and oppose legislation that would add to the debt while offering specific solutions to control the debt already on the books, rather than threatening not to pay the bills on borrowing that has already been incurred.”

MacGuineas also argued that the debt problem is only going to get worse.

“The debt ceiling does offer the opportunity for all lawmakers to pause, assess the fiscal situation of the nation, and take action as necessary. And it is necessary. The debt as a share of GDP is at near record levels,” she said. “We are on track to begin adding $2 trillion per year to the debt by the end of the decade. Interest payments are the fastest growing part of the budget and are projected to start costing $1 trillion annually in only a few years.

“The Social Security and Medicare Hospital Insurance trust funds are headed toward insolvency. And last year alone, Congress and the President passed bipartisan legislation that added nearly $2 trillion to the projected national debt. This is an urgent problem that is not getting the attention it needs.”

Coast Guard Monitoring Russian Spy Ship on Patrol off Hawaii

(Headline USA) A Russian spy ship has been patrolling off the coast of Hawaii but so far has remained in international waters, the Pentagon said Thursday.

While the appearance of a Russian surveillance ship along the U.S. coastline is not unusual, this one has attracted more attention because of heightened tensions between the U.S. and Russia over Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine and veiled threats to employ nuclear weapons.

The Vishnya-class Kareliya surveillance ship has been monitored by the U.S. Coast Guard sailing near Hawaii over the last several weeks.

“I can’t speak to why the Russians are sailing the ship right now, it’s kind of precarious timing,” said Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh. She said the Coast Guard is still monitoring the ship, which has been operating in international waters.

“We haven’t seen any unsafe or unprofessional behavior and we expect that the Russians will operate within the region in accordance with international law,” Singh said.

In a video posted to Twitter by the Coast Guard, the ship appears to be either being towed by another ship or in a resupply mode.

“U.S. Indo-Pacific Command is monitoring the Russian vessels operating in international waters in the Western Pacific,” the Pentagon said in a statement. “As Russia operates within the region, it is expected to do so in accordance with international law.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Texas A&M Med School Removes Photos of White Male Alumni for Diversity

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The Texas A&M University School of Medicine touted its anti-white racism and anti-men sexism when officials removed photos of its white male alumni to pander to woke dogma, boasting that the institution is committed to diversity, equity and inclusion.

Last year, the university completed a survey for the Association of American Medical Colleges, in which they included that response, according to the Washington Examiner. The medical watchdog group Do No Harm obtained the school’s survey responses through a Freedom of Information Act request.

The survey talked about commitment to DEI, including maintaining “holistic admissions,” requiring diversity training for search committees and reviewing salaries for “diversity.”

When the survey asked schools if they had eliminated things that made it “non-inclusive,” the Texas A&M School of Medicine said that it removed “the predominantly white male photos of [the] graduating class prominently displayed on the entrance” to the school.

The school decided to crawl on its knees a little bit more, claiming that even one of the non-white people who work at the university complained that the institution talks “too much” to students, faculty and staff about its “formal policies related to diversity, inclusion, and equity.”

However, there is no need to even look at the survey results to find out that the university, in general, and the medical school, in particular, are woke. The Texas A&M School of Medicine openly talks about its commitment to DEI.

“Knowledge is power, and the primary purpose of a tertiary educational institution is to uplift humanity through the continuous advancement of the power of knowledge,” the statement declared.

“This is achieved through the creation, dissemination and application of knowledge in service to humanity. Given that knowledge comes from diverse sources and experiences, diversity is a sine qua non of excellence in tertiary education.”

“Grounded in this fundamental framework, Texas A&M University is deeply committed to a culture that embraces, expands and celebrates diversity in an inclusive environment where all parties are appreciated, encouraged and supported,” the statement added.

Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, the board chairman for Do No Harm, said that he thinks that woke schools like Texas A&M are sacrificing merit on the leftist altar and, therefore, harming the medical profession.

“Enhanc[ing] the quality of the medical workforce is the responsibility of medical schools,” Goldfarb said.

“If they have more capable individuals that they can bring in compared to the ones that they are bringing in because of these requirements for diversity and they’re not bringing those more qualified, more capable individuals in, they’re eventually producing a workforce that’s going to be less capable.”

Flavored Cannabis Marketing is Criticized for Targeting Kids

(Headline USA) Government officials and politicians are finding their push to legalize drugs, specifically marijuana, is coming back to haunt them with a vengeance.

When New York’s first licensed recreational marijuana outlet opened last month, the chief of the state’s Office of Cannabis Management, Chris Alexander, proudly hoisted a tin of watermelon-flavored gummies above the crowd.

Outside the Manhattan shop, he displayed another purchase — a jar containing dried flowers of a cannabis strain called Banana Runtz, which some aficionados say has overtones of “fresh, fruity banana and sour candy.”

Inside the store run by the nonprofit Housing Works, shelves brimmed with vape cartridges suggesting flavors of pineapple, grapefruit and cereal milk, written in rainbow bubble letter print.

For decades, health advocates have chided the tobacco industry for marketing harmful nicotine products to children, resulting in more cities and states, like New York, outlawing flavored tobacco products, including e-cigarettes.

Now as cannabis shops proliferate across the country, the same concerns are growing over the packaging and marketing of flavored cannabis that critics say could entice children to partake of products labeled “mad mango,” “loud lemon” and “peach dream.”

“We should learn from the nicotine space, and I certainly would advocate that we should place similar concern on cannabis products in terms of their appealability to youth,” said Katherine Keyes, a professor of epidemiology at Columbia University who has written extensively about the rise in marijuana use among young people.

“If you go through a cannabis dispensary right now,” she said, “it’s almost absurd how youth-oriented a lot of the packaging and the products are.”

Keyes added that public health policymakers — and researchers like her — are trying to catch up with an industry and marketplace that is rapidly expanding and evolving.

The solution for the same bureaucrats and politicians who argued to legalize weed is to crack down aggressively with government regulations and oversight.

New York, which legalized recreational marijuana in March 2021, forbids marketing and advertising that “is designed in any way to appeal to children or other minors.”

But New York’s state Office of Cannabis Management has yet to officially adopt rules on labeling, packaging and advertising that could ban cartoons and neon colors, as well as prohibit depictions of food, candy, soda, drinks, cookies or cereal on packaging — all of which, the agency suggests, could attract people under 21.

“Consumers need to be aware — parents need to be aware — if they see products that look like other products that are commonly marketed to kids, that’s an illicit market product,” said Lyla Hunt, OCM’s deputy director of public health and campaigns.

Hunt recently saw a cannabis product calling itself ”Stony Patch Kids” that she said looked like the popular candy “Sour Patch Kids.”

Similar products are being sold by the dozens of illegal pot dispensaries that operate out in the open and that officials worry are selling unsafe products. Once packaging and marketing standards are established, the illicit marketplace will likely not comply, experts say.

State officials hope that products bought at licensed dispensaries will help.

“We can regulate until we’re blue in the face. But the truth is, it’s a partnership between a compliant industry, strong regulations that are robust in their protections for youth and then with parents, too,” Hunt said.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul announced Thursday the upcoming opening of the state’s second legal dispensary, which will be located in Manhattan’s West Village. The new venture — called “Smacked” — will open as a pop-up next week before opening a permanent location.

Under state law, a minor in possession of marijuana would face a civil penalty of not more than $50. Licensed cannabis retailers who sell to minors face fines and the loss of their licenses, but no jail time.

Science has long established the addictive nature of nicotine and the health maladies associated with smoking tobacco, including cancer and emphysema.

Less settled are the health repercussions from vaping, particularly among children whose bodies and internal organs have yet to fully develop.

While smoking tobacco cigarettes has fallen among teens and young adults, the use of e-cigarettes and vapes has risen.

A handful of states — California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island — have bans on most flavored tobacco products, including e-cigarettes and vapes. An increasing number of cities, including New York City, also have similar bans.

But those rules need to be broadened to include marijuana, said Linda Richter with the Partnership to End Addiction, who says the issue has yet to be widely addressed.

“There is more scrutiny on the tobacco industry, and very, very little in terms of rules, regulations, scrutiny, limitations when it comes to the cannabis industry,” she said.

Because of the relative infancy of the legalized industry, she added, states have yet to coalesce rules on a single national standard. States often look to the federal government to set those standards, but marijuana remains illegal on the federal level.

“That’s a real issue where you don’t have the weight of the federal government in terms of standards of packaging and marketing,” to set parameters to avoid appealing marketing to young people, Richter said.

Anti-smoking groups, including the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, have long railed against the tobacco industry for its marketing, such as using cartoon characters to help market their products. In more recent years, they’ve campaigned against flavored nicotine products, including those in vaping form.

But thus far, such groups have not put the marijuana industry in its crosshairs.

A study released earlier this month documented the steep rise in poisonings among young children, especially toddlers, who accidentally ate marijuana-laced treats.

The uptick in cases coincides with the rise in the number of states allowing the use of marijuana for medicine or recreation. Medical use of cannabis is currently allowed in 37 U.S. states, while 21 states allow recreational use.

“When you’re talking about strawberry-cheesecake, or mango, or cookies-and-cream flavors, it’s very difficult to argue that those are for older adults,” said Dr. Pamela Ling, the director for the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California in San Francisco.

“Folks who consider themselves to be more like cannabis aficionados,” she said, “would say that smoking a flavored cannabis product is like putting ketchup on your steak.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press