Dems Fret Senate Majority w/ Feinstein’s Shingles Hospitalization

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) For Democrats already panicking about a tenuous U.S. Senate majority that was fragile enough to recently force Vice President Kamala Harris into using her tie-breaking vote, a wicked case of shingles has kicked their partisan ado into overdrive. 

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., announced that she was hospitalized on Thursday and is receiving treatment for shingles. With Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., hospitalized in a limbo state with severe depression, and Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., sidelined by travels after his mother died, Senate Democrats find themselves without an outright majority.

Feinstein, 89, announced her retirement last month and had already missed a series of Senate votes and committee meetings.

“I was diagnosed over the February recess with a case of shingles,” Feinstein said in a statement on Thursday. “I have been hospitalized and am receiving treatment in San Francisco and expect to make a full recovery. I hope to return to the Senate later this month.”

The timing of Feinstein’s absence comes the Senate gears up for what is expected to be a tough confirmation hearing for President Joe Biden’s nominee for labor secretary, Julie Su.

Su has support from Senate Democrats but her record of overseeing massive COVID fraud during her stint as a top labor official in California might hit bumps with Republicans.

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., ranking member of the committee that will shepherd her nomination, called Su’s record “troubling,” Axios reported.

Trump Torches DOJ Claim that Dem. U.S. Reps Can Sue Him for J6 Injuries

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) Donald Trump issued a scathing repudiation of the Justice Department’s claim that nearly a dozen Democrat House members and two police officers can sue the former president for physical and psychological injuries they allegedly received during the Jan. 6, 2021, protests at the U.S. Capitol.

In a legal brief filed Thursday, the DOJ advised a federal appeals court that it should allow lawsuits to proceed that are looking to sue Trump for the actions of alleged J6 rioters, and dismiss the former president’s argument for immunity.

Trump’s spokesman said that not only does presidential immunity extend in this case, but also that the former president actively tried to prevent any injuries from occurring.

“President Trump’s speech and statements on January 6, 2021, repeatedly called for peace, patriotism, and respect for our men and women of law enforcement,” read a post on Truth Social.

“President Trump authorized up to 20,000 National Guard troops to ensure peace and safety on January 6, 2021, only to have that offer rejected by Democrats Nancy Pelosi and Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser. The D.C. Courts should rule in favor of President Trump in short order and dismiss these frivolous lawsuits.”

The Justice Department’s filing acknowledged the former president’s right to speak “to the public on matters of public concern,” but argued “It does not include incitement of imminent private violence,” according to the Washington Post.

“Presidents may at times use strong rhetoric. And some who hear that rhetoric may overreact, or even respond with violence,” the DOJ wrote. But its attorneys advised the court to consider legal precedent from a 1969 Ku Klux Klan-linked case ruling that speech “directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action” or “likely to incite or produce such action” is not protected by the First Amendment.

In its filing, the DOJ said they weren’t arguing that any of the allegations that Trump triggered the J6 uprising were true, “only that the ‘plausibly allege[d]’ claims describe conduct outside the scope of a president’s official duties,” the Post reported.

Trump’s attorneys argued that the former president’s words didn’t come close to inciting violence and that “in the run-up to January 6th and on the day itself, [Trump] was acting well within the scope of ordinary presidential action when he engaged in open discussion and debate about the integrity of the 2020 election.”

“The actions of rioters do not strip President Trump of immunity,” his lawyers wrote in their court filings.

The former president’s spokesman echoed those sentiments, and drew historical precedents for extra measure.

“The Department of Justice has rightfully agreed that presidential immunity is broad and absolute,” the spokesman wrote. “If it were not, Joe Biden would be personally liable for the disasters in Afghanistan, our Southern Border, record drug use causing massive destruction of families and lives, and many other terrible crises that he has caused. Additionally, other Presidents throughout history would be held responsible for catastrophes they potentially may not be responsible for. All witch hunts and hoaxes have to end!”

Clinically Depressed Fetterman Reportedly Co-Sponsored Train Safety Bill from Hospital

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., has not been seen or heard from publicly since being institutionalized weeks ago for clinical depression, but somehow has managed from his hospital bed to miraculously co-sponsor legislation on train safety.

Exactly how a clinically depressed, allegedly brain-dead senator signed on to the legislation, as well co-authoring a letter to Norfolk Southern, remained unknown.

When Stephen L. Miller, a contributing editor for The Spectator, asked for clarification, Fetterman’s chief of staff refused to provide an answer and instead blocked the reporter on Twitter.

Fetterman, who stumbled through a midterm campaign after suffering a stroke that his handlers tried to downplay and hide from voters, was rushed to a hospital last month after feeling “lightheaded”. He was released but re-hospitalized, allegedly for clinical depression.

Concerns have increased over Fetterman’s health after his spokesman last week dodged allegations that the senator was reportedly brain-dead and being kept under wraps while party operatives decided how to fill his U.S. Senate seat.

“We don’t have a lot to update folks with since there’s no real news to report except that John is doing well,” Joe Calvello offered in a cryptically upbeat tweet. “We understand the intense interest in John’s status … this will be a weeks-long process and while we will be sure to keep folks updated as it progresses, this is all there is to give by way of an update.”

The vague platitudes from staffers that provided no details or personal message from Fetterman only served to fuel speculation and concerns about the stroke victim’s status. Pennsylvania’s Washington County Republican Party demanded transparency, reportedly writing that it “refuses to take assurances from the Office of the Senator or Democrat operatives that Fetterman is able to carry out his duties as Senator.”

“Ultimately, if Fetterman is unable or unwilling to carry out his duties as a United States Senator, then we ask for his resignation and call for a special election to be held this year; no more lies or games,” wrote county party chairman Sean Logue.

Instead of providing any clarification, Fetterman’s chief of staff chose to attack conservatives and anyone who questioned the status of the hobbled senator.

“There has been an uptick in ugliness from the right,” tweeted Adam Jentleson, claiming that his office had received nothing but well-wishes for Fetterman.

The public backlash noted that hoping the senator was healthy and also demanding accountability weren’t mutually exclusive, while others blamed Fetterman’s handlers for abusing their boss by forcing him to undertake a grueling midterm campaign.

“People of good will can wish Senator Fetterman a speedy recovery, and I certainly do—but the question remains, how can he co-sponsor legislation when he’s hospitalized, particularly when the public does not know is (sic) actual condition?” one comment inquired.

“Fetterman? Really…. Funny nobody has seen him,” cracked another, while one offered, “I’m pretty sure that Fetterman had no idea what is going on.”

Fetterman has allegedly co-sponsored five bills since checking himself into the hospital on Feb. 16, which has ignited more concerns about who is really doing the work.

“If Fetterman is in a hospital for depression, then how can he be cognitively aware or signing anything as a Senator?” asked one constituent. “Who is acting as his person? It is illegal. If Fetterman cannot serve his oath of office he must resign. Why are you avoiding answering this? You must answer.”

The Gateway Pundit’s Kristinn Taylor ripped Fetterman’s office for grossly mishandling the senator’s absence, keeping constituents in the dark for going weeks.

Sen. Mike Lee: ‘Not a Chance in Hell’ FISA Spy Powers Will Be Renewed

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, said Wednesday that unless drastic reforms are made to address malfeasance within the Justice Department, there’s “not a chance in hell” that he’ll support renewing the U.S. government’s soon-to-expire spying powers.

Lee was speaking about Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which allows the U.S. government to target foreigners outside the U.S. for intelligence purposes. This often results in the collection of Americans’ communications.

The senator cited a litany of Section 702 abuses perpetrated by the DOJ, which were revealed in a recent government audit conducted by the DOJ and Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

The abuses included the FBI monitoring a local political party “to determine if the party had connections to foreign intelligence,” as well as numerous searches through 702 data for an unnamed “U.S. congressman.”

“There’s not a chance in hell we’re going to reauthorize that thing without some major reforms,” Lee said Wednesday, speaking to Attorney General Merrick Garland during the Senate Judiciary Committee’s DOJ oversight hearing.

To Lee’s concerns, the FBI promises that it has made reforms since the audit, which covers the period Dec. 1, 2019, to May 31, 2020.

However, a report last year from ODNI revealed that the number of searches conducted by the FBI of Americans’ communications doubled from 2020 to 2021.

According to the report, the FBI used its Section 702 powers to collect the data of roughly 3.4 million U.S. people in 2021—up from 1.3 million a year before. The report only provides statistics for 2020 and 2021.

Senior Biden administration officials reportedly attributed the uptick in FBI searches to Russian cyberattacks throughout 2021.

But privacy activists said last year’s report as well as this latest audit further demonstrate the need for FISA reform.

“There is a reason EPIC has spent years advocating for reform of Section 702 and for the end of the backdoor search loophole the FBI uses to conduct warrantless searches—these searches are ripe for abuse. The FBI has proven this over and over again,” Electronic Privacy Information Center lawyer Jeramie Scott said in a statement Friday

“These latest revelations are only the latest in a string of improper FBI searches that violate Americans’ privacy. Congress must enact serious reform of Section 702 or let the authority expire.”

Lee’s skepticism about reauthorizing Seciton 702 is joined by other leading Republicans, including House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Parent Calls Biden ‘Despicable’ for Laughing at Her Boys’ Deaths to Fentanyl

(Adrienne Ferguson, Headline USA) President Biden has come under fire from a Michigan mother whose two kids overdosed on fentanyl and died, calling him “despicable” for laughing off the claim that his administration was to blame.

Rebecca Kiessling ripped Biden on Wednesday night after he cited her family’s tale to refute Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene‘s claim that the president was to blame for the deaths of her sons Caleb, 20, and Kyler, 18, who both died in July 2020 after consuming fentanyl-laced Percocet tablets.

“This is how you speak about the death of my sons? Because a congresswoman misspoke? You mock the loss of my sons?” Kiessling said in a heated video uploaded on Facebook.

Tuesday, Kiessling testified before the House Homeland Security Committee about the death of her kids and urged Lawmakers to take additional action to halt the importation of fentanyl.

Greene empathized with Kiessling and her loss, saying that if the Biden administration had tightened border controls and halted the supply of drugs into the US, the brothers may still be alive.

On Wednesday night when speaking to a group of House Democrats in Baltimore, Biden made light of Greene by joking that the boys passed away during the Trump administration and laughed it off as a farce.

Kiessling requested an apology from the president and expressed her disbelief at Biden’s response.

“How dare you. What is the matter with you? Almost every Democrat on the committee offered condolences, they at least had the decency to do that. You can’t even do that? You have to mock my pain?” she said.

Kiessling acknowledged that her sons passed away six months before Biden was elected, but since then, she has been critical of how the government has handled the fentanyl issue, which has exploded into a national crisis under Biden’s watch.

Disney Slammed For Upcoming ‘Woke’ Peter Pan Live-Action

(Headline USA) Disney’s upcoming live action film Peter Pan & Wendy was blasted this week after a new trailer provided a glimpse into the film’s “woke agenda.”

The trailer, released on Wednesday, shows Wendy arriving in Neverland and encountering the Lost Boys — which now includes both boys and girls in the film.

“But you’re not all boys,” Wendy points out.

“So?” one of the girls responds.

The film also hired Yara Shahidi, a black actress, to play Tinkerbell, who is famously blonde and blue-eyed in the original story.

“The diversity nonsense at Disney continues,” Twitter user Noble Brown said. “Tinkerbell is black/The Lost Boys now have girls among them/Truly a reflection of the UK in 1911, exactly as JM Barrie envisioned.”

Disney has come under fire over the past few years for pushing wokeism onto children. The company’s embrace of leftist ideology has even earned legislative rebukes from Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who recently signed a bill stripping Disney World of its self-government status.

“For more than 50 years, the state of Florida put Disney on a pedestal,” DeSantis wrote in an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal. “Democrats often rail about corporations’ nefarious influence over politics and oppose favorable exceptions for big companies. Yet they supported keeping Disney’s special self-governing status. This confirms how much the modern left has jettisoned principle in favor of power. As long as large corporations help advance the left’s woke agenda, the left is willing to do their bidding.”

DeSantis went on to accuse Disney of siding with Democrats to “achieve through corporate power what it can’t get at the ballot box.”

“Leaders must stand up and fight back when big corporations make the mistake, as Disney did, of using their economic might to advance a political agenda,” DeSantis wrote. “We are making Florida the state where the economy flourishes because we are the state where woke goes to die.”

Cori Bush and Her Security Guard Hubby May Have Broken Law

(Abdul–Rahman Oladimeji Bello, Headline USA). Squad leftist Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., recently got married to her security guard, which sparked some ethical concerns because her campaign paid $60,000 to Cortney Merritts, now husband, as security payments. However, the matter has passed the line of ethics and he is now being accused of breaking the law.

To perform private security services in St. Louis, an individual must have a private security license. According to Fox News, Merritts does not have a license to operate in the area. Yet, he pocketed payments running into thousands of dollars from Bush’s campaign.

The fishy financial transactions have now also land Bush in hot water, according to the Washington Examiner. The government watchdog group Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust has asked the Federal Election Commission to investigate Bush for using campaign cash to line her own coffers by funneling money to her security guard husband.

“Any time a member of Congress puts someone with a close personal relationship on the campaign payroll, increased scrutiny is necessary to ensure the legal standard has been met,” Kendra Arnold, FACT’s executive director, said. “Both the fact that reportedly Bush’s husband isn’t licensed to provide security services for which he was paid and that she was simultaneously paying large amounts to another company for the same services raise red flags that warrant an investigation by the FEC.”

Fox News came to know about Merritts’s problems after it filed a public records request with the St. Louis Police Department over his license. A response came back clarifying that Bush’s heartthrob doesn’t have a current license.

The records search for Merritts’s license spanned St. Louis and its neighboring county. These are all the areas under Bush’s congressional district. In addition, Merritts was also missing in the Washing DC’s database for licensed security professionals.

A statement from the St. Louis Police Department website reads: “With the exception of St. Louis Police Officers, all persons performing a security function in the City of St. Louis must be licensed to do so through the Private Security Section.”

Bush has been under fire ever since she hired private security. It was termed ‘hypocritical’ that she paid over $300,000 from January to December 2022 for private security while clamoring for defunding the police. CBS News questioned the Democrat about her private security spending when Fox News released details of her spending in 2021.

“They would rather I die? You would rather I die?” said Bush, claiming that as a black woman she was a target. “You want to see me die? You know, because that could be the alternative.”

POLL: Overwhelming Majority of Californians Don’t Want Newsom to Run For President

(Headline USA) An overwhelming majority of Californians do not want Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom to run for president, according to a new poll.

The survey from Quinnipiac University shows that 70% of California residents do not want Newsom to seek higher office, while only 24% say they would like to see him run. Even among Democrats, 54% say they do not want Newsom to launch a 2024 bid.

“A resounding thumbs down from the home team as California voters tell the governor: if you have designs on the big job beyond Sacramento, we’re not on board,” Tim Malloy, polling analyst for Quinnipiac University, said in a statement.

In 2021, it appeared voters had finally soured on Newsom. However, he survived a recall effort and cruised to reelection. Still, it appears their support for him could be waning as his mishandling of the state’s budget becomes more apparent.

“It’s true of every governor: When you start having to cut back on the budget, that’s usually a time when voters get more critical of you,” IGS Poll Director Mark DiCamillo told the Los Angeles Times. “Now, we haven’t gotten there yet. But that’s why we say there’s clouds on the horizon.”

Newsom has denied any plans to run for president in 2024, saying he is “all in” on President Joe Biden. However, he’s continued to fuel speculations about his intentions as he takes on prominent GOP leaders such as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Last summer, for example, he spent $105,000 on Fox News advertisements in Florida, urging Floridians to look to California if they dislike DeSantis’s “radical” agenda.

Newsom has also called out leaders of his own party.

“Where the hell is my party? Where’s the Democratic Party?” he said after the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade. “You guys paying attention to what’s going on?”

World Is Nearing Peak Population

(Bill King, RealClear Wire) I regularly talk to well-informed people who do not realize that world population growth is rapidly decelerating. Currently, the UN estimates the most likely case is that the world’s population will top out around 10 billion in 2080 and then begin a long, slow decline. Other modelers are projecting the peak will be reached in 2060 at 9 billion and then decline more rapidly. Some scenarios predict there will be fewer people on the planet at the end of century than there are now.

The United Nation’s predictions for the U.S. are similar, with our population topping out at around 380 million near the end of the century. This is consistent with the Congressional Budget Office projections, which assume the U.S. annual population growth rate over the next 20 years will decline from 0.5% to 0.2%. Without immigration, the U.S. population would begin to decline around 2035.

Many of us grew up reading Paul Ehrlich’s runaway best-seller The Population Bomb, which predicted a worldwide apocalypse was just around the corner. The book, written in 1968, categorically predicted that “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death.” Of course, that did not happen and since around 2000, researchers have found there have been more obese people in the world than those who are undernourished.

In part, it did not happen because of an explosion of agricultural technology in the 1950s and 1960s known as the Green Revolution. But Ehrlich’s prediction also never came to pass because he missed that at the time of their book, women had already begun having fewer babies.

The critical metric for population growth is the average number of children women are having at any particular time, known as the fertility rate. Other factors, such as childhood survival and longevity, also affect population growth, but the fertility rate is the big driver. It takes a fertility rate of 2.1 children per woman to maintain a stable population, known as the “replacement rate.” Anything above that and the population will grow and below that it falls.

When The Population Bomb was published, the fertility rate was stunningly high at 5. That astronomical rate would go on to cause the world population to double just 40 years later. But what was not apparent to the author at the time was that the fertility rate had peaked about five years earlier at 5.3. That began a steady slide downward to 2.3 today, just barely above the replacement rate.

However, a decline in the fertility rate does not show up at once. It takes a while for that lower rate to work through the generational cycle, something referred as “population momentum.” That is why you still see a hefty 25% increase in the world’s population in the projections before it tops out in 2080.

Many countries around the world are already beginning to feel the effects of slowing population growth. Japan and Russia both face looming drastic population declines. China announced this year that for the first time its population had declined. Some countries have adopted policies to encourage young couples to have more children.

Of course, there is no question that the decline in population growth is very welcome news. Without the downturn we would be facing the apocalypse that Ehrlich foresaw as we put ever-increasing demands on the earth’s finite resources.

But our civilization has been based on steady population growth and astronomical population since the mid-20th century. Programs such as Social Security and Medicare will not work in a world where the population is flat or declining, at least not without some substantial modification. Because lower fertility rates are correlated with educational attainment, the most uneducated, poorest parts of the world will be growing the fastest. The only places in the world currently with a fertility rate well above the replacement rate are Africa and central Asia. This dichotomy will result in greater wealth disparity and conflicts.

The new population paradigm will cause many headaches which our children and grandchildren will have to wrestle. Some are obvious and some probably unforeseeable. It would be great if the world could start thinking through those issues now and begin to prepare. However, human behavior over the centuries has shown that kind of long-term planning is not one of our strong suits.