(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) A gang of black elementary students attacked white children while forcing them to profess that “black lives matter” in an Ohio school, according to a video of the event, but the NAACP says they should not be charged.
The 17-minute video shows the black gang interacting with three white students.
One white student was escorted to a place by a swing set, pushed to the ground, and forced to speak.
Another white student was carried over by the black gang and dropped to the ground.
A third white student was pushed to the ground in the same spot.
All three were forced to profess, “Black Lives Matter.”
One student was punched in the head, and more students report being carried over to the same spot, according to Dayton 24/7 Now.
The principal of the school, Kenwood Elementary, told police that white students who refused to announce “black lives matter,” were “chased down and escorted, dragged or carried” to the area near the swings, according to the New York Post.
Police say that at least one of the white children were punched in the head.
Allison Elliot, Springfield’s female Police Chief, described the event at a press conference before the video was released.
“Multiple students were assaulted on the playground,” she said, leaving out the political and racial nature of the assaults.
“We are actively pursuing charges for the identified assaults,” she said.
Krystal Harr, reported that her 12-year-old sixth grader was victimized by the black gang.
“Watch your babies! This is getting unsafe!” she wrote on Facebook.
Denise Williams, president of the local NAACP, said the incident was blown out of proportion according to Dayton 24/7 Now.
“This is a teachable moment,” she said. “We need to really educate the school, and the parents.”
Williams said she does not believe charges should be brought, but rather that parents should have an open discussion.
“I’m calling on all parents,” she said. “Let’s talk instead of talking about each other.”
(Deroy Murdock, Headline USA) The Left’s outright lies about Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., suggest that they fear him and aim to sandbag him through their usual methods: rampant deceit and racial division.
First, CBS News’s 60 Minutes concocted an elaborate fiction in which DeSantis supposedly arranged for Palm Beach County seniors to receive COVID-19 vaccines through Publix, as a payoff for the grocery chain’s $100,000 donation to his re-election campaign.
This pay-to-play fantasy began to unravel when Publix explained that its stores had administered seasonal flu shots for years, and the company had volunteered to offer COVID shots on a non-exclusive basis.
Next, left-wing journalists, politicians and the neo-radical Walt Disney Company accused DeSantis of signing the so-called “Don’t Say Gay” bill and dragging gay rights back to the dark ages, before 1969’s Stonewall Riots.
This lawdoes say that “classroom instruction…on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3,” a perfectly reasonable position that normal Americans overwhelmingly support. So, DeSantis’s enemies flat-out lied about this measure, to tar him as a monstrous homophobe.
Third, leftists play the race card as routinely as most Americans breathe. So, naturally, when DeSantis objected to the College Board’s Advanced Placement Black Studies curriculum, they accused him of—what else?—a racist conspiracy to whitewash slavery.
After DeSantis’s press team screamed bloody murder, Mrs. Alan Greenspan conceded that her execrable comments were “imprecise”—much as it would be imprecise to call Florida a Canadian province. Mitchell full-on lied.
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre also lied about DeSantis: “If you think about the study of black Americans, that is what he wants to block.”
DeSantis, in fact, signed legislation that requires teaching slavery.
Gov. Ron DeSantis signs the Stop WOKE Act, which mandates the teaching of slavery in Florida’s public classrooms, on April 22, 2022. / Courtesy Florida Governor’s Office
Approved last April 22, the “Stop WOKE Act” established “Required instruction” in K-12 government schools including “the enslavement experience, abolition, …the vital contributions of African Americans to build and strengthen American society and celebrate the inspirational stories of African Americans who prospered, even in the most difficult circumstances.”
This law also encourages teachers to discuss “slavery, racial oppression, racial segregation, and racial discrimination…”
DeSantis also signed House Bill 1213 on June 23, 2020, mandating that Florida students learn about the 1920 Ocoee Massacre—an atrocity perpetrated by Democrat Ku Klux Klan members and some 250 white racists, who fatally shot, burned and lynched an estimated 30 to 35 black Floridians to stop them from voting and scare others from the polls.
Chart outlining DeSantis’s concerns about AP black history course / Courtesy Florida governor’s office
After implementing what he supports, DeSantis recently opposed specific topics within the AP course that go far beyond slavery into something resembling, at best, Black Lives Matter propaganda.
A small sample:
“Intersectionality and Activism” features readings by former Black Panther Angela Davis, the 1980 and 1984 vice presidential nominee of the Communist Party USA.
“Movement for Black Lives” highlights Rutgers sociology professor Leslie Kay Jones who whined about “the white supremacist superstructures that oppress us.”
“Black Queer Studies” showcases Yale Women’s, Gender, & Sexuality Studies professor Roderick Ferguson who explains: “It means building forms of queerness that reject the given realities of the government and the market.”
“Florida statute requires the teaching of slavery and its aftermath,” DeSantis’s deputy press secretary, Jeremy Redfern, noted Feb. 22 via Twitter. “We just know that ‘queer studies’ has nothing to do with Jim Crow.”
Once again, @mitchellreports is "imprecise" in her description because she relies on unnamed "historians and teachers."
The Democrats’ intellectual and public-policy bankruptcy is confirmed by the fact that leftist politicians and journalists do not challenge Ron DeSantis’s pro-American, pro-freedom, pro-market governing philosophy. Instead, they yell, “Homophobe!” “Racist!” and lie, lie, lie as loudly as possible.
Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News Contributor.
On the first day of the leftist-created so-called Women’s History Month, Hershey decided to insult all females and non-soy males by introducing a delusional man who thinks that he is a woman as one of the faces of its commemorative “SHE” bar, according to the Daily Wire. The company went as far as creating a social media ad with “Fae” Johnstone gaslighting actual women.
The Daily Wire and its co-founder Jeremy Boreing decided to fight against the nonsense and far-left ideas of the chocolate company by creating a non-woke alternative to the leftist brand after people on Twitter urged Boreing to do so.
“Fine,” Boreing tweeted early Friday. “I’ll do it. Introducing Jeremy’s Chocolate. Yes, it’s real. We have two kinds: HeHim and SheHer. One of them has nuts. If you need me to tell you which one, keep buying Hershey’s.”
“The people asked and we answered,” he added, according to the Daily Wire. “Thanks to Jeremy’s Chocolate, you can stop eating chocolate that hates you. Harry’s Razors hates you; Disney hates you; and now Hershey’s hates you. As long as corporations and institutions across America continue to alienate half the country, The Daily Wire will continue building alternatives. Stop giving your money to woke chocolate companies that hate you.”
This is not the first time that the conservative news company decided to fight the woke virus.
In January 2021, the Daily Wire hired then-recently canceled Hollywood star Gina Carano to produce and star in the company’s movie “Terror on the Prairie” after she was fired from Disney.
In March 2022, the news company decided to create non-woke shaving products for men when Harry’s Razors pulled its ads from the Daily Wire, citing “values misalignment.” In its first year, the company sold 100,000 subscriptions, proving that people don’t want to give their money to woke corporations.
The same month, the Daily Wire announced that it will fight for the minds of the children by investing $100 million into kids’ entertainment after leaked videos from inside Disney revealed a producer bragging about their “not-so-secret” gay agenda.
“I’m thinking about it, and I’ve passed the biggest hurdle, which is my wife has green lighted it,” Kennedy told an enthusiastic, capacity crowd that cheered his speech, New Hampshire Public Radio reported.
Kennedy, a vocal vaccine realist, was banned from Instagram in 2021 for spreading what was deemed as vaccine misinformation.
The issues of vaccines and censorship both came under fire during Kennedy’s speech at St. Anselm College, which historically has been a key stop for presidential contenders from both parties looking for New Hampshire support.
Taking aim at the social media censorship and vilification of vaccine critics, Kennedy warned about political divides that have created “probably the greatest polarization in our country’s history that we’ve ever had since the Civil War, really dangerous polarization.” The situation, he said, has become “very, very tribal.”
Kennedy, who describes himself as a lifelong Democrat, has broken with tribe, specifically the Biden regime, on vaccines and the decision to bump New Hampshire from its top spot on the DNC’s calendar, replaced with South Carolina.
The prospect of Kennedy entering the presidential race comes as President Joe Biden continues to stumble, both atthe polls and physically with alarming rate, and faces skepticism from some members of his own party about his prospects for a 2024 run.
Contrast that to Kennedy’s rising star and presidential pedigree, the son of the late Sen. Robert F. Kennedy and the nephew of the late President John F. Kennedy, which has seen his popularity increase across the political spectrum, as noted in a prescient call from Steve Bannon.
“Robert F. Kennedy Jr. could jump into the Republican primary for president, and only DeSantis and Trump, I think, would do better,” Bannon said last week.
Kennedy told ABC that he wouldn’t let Biden seeking a second term influence his own decision to enter the race. The regime’s handling of vaccines would be one of his campaign issues, along with “the rigging of the system, the war against America’s middle class,” he said.
“And all of these injuries that I speak about to children, there is no bigger issue for our country than that,” Kennedy said. “Show me where I got it wrong. Let’s talk about it.”
“Imbalanced or heavily biased news search results can have a negative impact on our democracy and elections,” Julie Mastrine, director of marketing and media bias ratings at AllSides, the organization that performed the study, told the Daily Signal.
“When people cannot access the full range of views on political and societal issues, they are subject to partisan manipulation and cannot truly decide for themselves.”
AllSides, a media company that is dedicated to presenting balanced news and diverse perspectives to the public, analyzed the Google News homepage and search results from Oct. 31 to Nov. 4, 2022, checking them alongside their media bias chart.
According to the results of the study, 61% of media outlets that appeared on Google News’ homepage were politically on the left, 25% were centrist sources and only 3% of news coverage was conservative.
AllSides also analyzed Google News search results on six specific search terms, almost all of which showed overwhelmingly leftist results: “Trump,” 88%, “Election,” 96%, “Biden,” 68% and “Abortion,” 88%. “Crime,” 36%, and “Economy,” 48%, were the only results where conservative news sources were in the majority.
After the study was released, Google tried to defend itself and ignore the evidence of its leftist bias.
“Our systems do not take political ideology into account, and we go to extraordinary lengths to build our products for everyone,” the spokesperson stated. “This study’s methodology is deeply flawed. It cherry-picked a few topics and ran for a very brief period of time, presenting a misleading picture of Google News.”
Google already showed its far-left political bias countless times before, as it was heavily reported by Cancel This Company.
(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) An Arizona school board member wearing cat ears who self-identifies as a “neurodivergent Queer Black Latina,” lectured Christians about their dangerous religious beliefs and declared that they had no place in classrooms.
The Washington Elementary School District governing board agreed, and last month dissolved an existing contract with Arizona Christian University that had placed student-teachers in the district’s schools, AZFamily reported.
Backlash from parents was swift and a state senator is demanding the resignation of at least one of the school board members.
The partnership with the university had helped student-teachers gain valuable classroom experience, and for years benefited a school system dealing with a severe shortage of teachers, according to both the school system and the university.
“Administrators have time and again asked us to send more ACU students because of the quality of our students’ work and their love and servant’s hearts for all,” Arizona Christian University said in a statement. “The school board’s recent decision to ban ACU students from serving as student teachers was done for one reason only: our University’s commitment to our Christian convictions.”
The Arizona school board’s concern about the possibility of those Christian beliefs being spread in their schools took precedent, and the contract was killed.
School board member Tamillia Valenzuela, the self-proclaimed “dope ass human, neurodivergent Queer Black Latina,” said she “full-heartedly” believed in religious freedom and “people being able to practice whatever faith that they have,” but she had “some… concerns regarding looking at this particular institution.”
Valenzuela was alarmed by the university’s website that stated “‘above all else, be committed to Jesus Christ, accomplishing His will and advancing His kingdom on earth as in heaven.’”
She was also troubled by the university’s values to “influence, engage and transform the culture with truth by promoting the biblically informed values that are foundational to Western civilization, including the centrality of family, traditional sexual morality and lifelong marriage between one man and one woman.”
Partnering with the university “will very directly impact three of your board members who are a part of the LGBTQ community,” Valenzuela warned, reminding the board that they had “added our pronouns at the dais as solidarity” to make sure the LGBT community knew “we stand in making sure that they feel protected.”
“Are we only performing performative solidarity? Or are we going to dig deep, and actually look at the partnerships that we’re doing?” she asked. “At some point, we need to get real with ourselves and take a look at who we’re making legal contracts with, and the message that that is sending to our community.”
Arizona state Sen. Anthony Kern said that the school district’s killing the contract because of the university’s religious beliefs crossed several lines. Kern, a Republican, called for Valenzuela’s immediate resignation over her “discriminatory remarks.” If it wasn’t delivered, Kern said he would demand the school district’s governing board to oust her.
“While we’re facing a shortage of teachers, Valenzuela is impugning the motives of teachers with certain religious beliefs. This is NOT what our country was founded on,” Kern said in a statement. “This is absolute discrimination, and somebody like this should not be making decisions for Arizona and Arizona families.”
Some of those families agreed and criticized the school board’s decision.
“Teachers are stretched so thin right now, doing the best they can,” parent Kalyn Foggy told AZFamily. “To turn people away based on deeply personally held beliefs is just wrong.”
Arizona Christian University officials said they are “exploring our options to defend the rights of our students,” adding that the school board’s decision to end the contract was “wrong, it’s unlawful, and it will only hurt the district’s students.”
On Thursday, a failed censor posted a five-minute video that is titled “Help Nina Jankowicz Fight Fox News,” in which she asked people to give her money so that she would be able to fund her lawsuit against one of the mass media giants, according to the Daily Caller. As of March 4, 2023, her channel has only eight subscribers and the video has a little bit less than 4,000 views. Unsurprisingly, the ex-soon-to-be head of the American “Ministry of Truth” disabled the dislikes and turned off the comments on the video.
“I’m asking for your financial support of a lawsuit I want to bring against Fox News for their malicious, reckless lies against me,” Jankowicz said at the beginning of the video, adding that shutting people up was her “lifelong dream.”
“The network made over 500 scaremongering statements about my role, my views and my personal life over the next nine months—an entirely disproportionate disinformation and smear campaign against a person who simply took a job to serve her country within her area of expertise,” she wrote on her GoFundMe page.
Jankowicz also suggested that, since she became a public figure, she was violently threatened online by hundreds of people, blaming “Congressional Republicans and the right-wing media” for characterizing her as an “unhinged, partisan, unserious, dangerous fascist.”
From late April to early May 2022, Jankowicz led the “disinformation” board, until she was forced to resign after she and the Biden administration faced widespread pushback against the board and Jankowicz herself.
Not surprisingly, the person who was picked by the Biden administration to censor people has a far-left bias. Ironically, it was Jankowicz who was previously spreading disinformation about the Hunter Biden laptop, pushing the debunked Steele Dossier narrative down people’s throats and saying that a former Trump advisor Carter Page was an agent straight from Kremlin. Also, her old speeches during her short tenure with DHS displayed her partisan attacks against Republicans.
Previous instances of Jankowicz spreading disinformation about the Hunter Biden laptop, the debunked Steele Dossier and former Trump advisor Carter Page were uncovered. Old speeches she gave featuring partisan attacks against Republicans were also discovered during her short tenure with DHS, according to Fox News.
After Jankowicz resigned from DHS, the organization “paused” the board shortly after and officially shuttered the project in August. On her GoFundMe page, Jankowicz wrote that the board caved to a “GOP disinformation campaign.”
(Ken Silva, Headline USA) On Dec. 2, 1975, the Church Committee heard former undercover informant Gary Thomas Rowe testify about the bureau’s undercover infiltration operations.
Rowe was a malodorous man—a former KKK member widely suspected of being an agent provocateur involved in church bombings, attacking protestors and even the murder of civil rights activist Viola Gregg Liuzzo.
Nevertheless, his testimony was invaluable. He described how, as an FBI informant inside the KKK, he organized an assault on the 1961 Freedom Riders; how the bureau bugged the hotel rooms of activists such as Martin Luther King Jr.; and how FBI officials encouraged him to sleep with other Klansmen’s wives to sow discord within the group.
The New York Times wrote in July 1978 that Rowe “has forced the nation to take a hard new look at informers. How far should they be allowed to go? … And when an informant has nothing on which to inform, is it his job to provoke misconduct?”
But nearly 50 years later, Democrats are trying to discredit FBI whistleblowers with far cleaner records and reputations than Rowe ever had. Democrats on the House Weaponization Subcommittee released a 315-page report, attacking three FBI whistleblowers who provided information to committee Republicans.
The report, released Thursday, purports to debunk the whistleblowers’ allegations by quoting cherry-picked excerpts from the interviews they conducted with the Weaponization Subcommittee, which was formed to investigate FBI malfeasance.
The report does not include the full interview transcriptions, but the committee Democrats nevertheless claim that the interviews revealed the whistleblowers to be, in fact, disgruntled former bureau employees with a political axe to grind.
“These individuals, who put forward a wide range of conspiracy theories, did not present actual evidence of any wrongdoing,” the Democrat report said of the whistleblowers—retired FBI intelligence analyst George Hill, former special agent Stephen Friend and suspended special agent Garret O’Boyle.
Among the “conspiracies” pushed by the whistleblowers include questions about agent provocateurs in the Jan. 6 crowd, their push for the FBI to open a civil rights violation investigation into the murder of Ashli Babbit, and the accurate observation that Jan. 6 protestors did not kill any police officers.
One of the whistleblowers, Friend, responded to the attacks on his character in a series of tweets.
A thread on the latest efforts to intimidate and discredit whistleblowers.
“Different people have different opinions about my motivations for bringing my whistleblower complaint forward. Here are the facts: I was an exemplary performer with multiple performance awards … During each meeting with my chain of command, managers stated that I had a great reputation within the FBI and admonished me that blowing the whistle could jeopardize a great career,” he wrote.
“I made that sacrifice because I believe I am doing the right thing in accordance with my oath of office. I just wanted to make the FBI a better place.”
Like Rowe did nearly 50 years ago, the three FBI whistleblowers may have the chance to testify at a future Weaponization Subcommittee hearing. The Democrats’ report urged the committee to have them testify publicly.
“The American public should be able to judge for themselves whether these witnesses or their allegations are remotely credible,” the report said.
(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) In her new book, The Snowflakes’ Revolt: How Woke Millennials Hijacked American Media, journalist Amber Athey revealed how reporters at Politico were warned to not use the word “mother” and other terms that would state biological reality.
Athey’s book also pointed out something that most people knew already — the generation of woke reporters took control of the American newsrooms, according to the Daily Mail.
“They create a culture of fear in which everyone — including the adults who are supposed to be in charge — is terrified of stepping out of line and becoming a target of the bullies.”
In her book, she also described how two people at Politico became triggered after one of the correspondents, Gabby Orr, published an article titled “GOP seizes on women’s sports as [an] unlikely wedge issue.”
It came to the point when Orr was told to participate in a meeting with Politico’s Director of Editorial Diversity Initiatives, Robin Turner, where she was questioned about her working for the center-right Washington Examiner and the fact that she didn’t include any opinions of men who pretend to be women in her article, while quoting conservatives, such as American Principles Project Director Terry Schilling and former White House policy adviser Stephen Miller.
Turner was also concerned about Orr’s interviewees using the phrase “biological women” because it may be offensive to people.
The meeting resulted in Turner telling Orr that her leftist colleagues will work as “sensitivity readers” to make sure that her future stories would not be offensive and cause any controversy.
Unsurprisingly, Orr left Politico shortly afterward. Her choice of another employer wasn’t a very smart move though, since she joined CNN.
The situation with Orr wasn’t the only case that showed the far-Left political bias of the publication. According to one of Politico’s seminars, correspondents were told to report in a “more comprehensive and inclusive way” when it came to “transgender” issues.
Panelists also told reporters in an email that summarizes the seminar that neutral coverage is not okay too, since a neutral position was created by “white, cisgender men.”
“One former Politico reporter who attended the seminar said the panelists complained that the word ‘mother’ could potentially be offensive when used by reporters and mocked reporters who had a hard time grappling with the grammatical implications of referring to singular individuals as ‘they/them,'” Athey wrote and added that woke Politico reporters also argued that the phrase “birthing moms” should be replaced with “birthing people.”
After that, a censor was appointed to make sure reporters use the “right” phrases and, in January 2022, a style guide that warned against using the phrase “pregnant women” was released.
Sixty-one percent of likely voters said it was either very likely –39% — or somewhat likely — 22% — that undercover government agents helped provoke the Capitol riot, and 59% of men and 63% of women said that they believe that federal agents helped to provoke the Capitol riot.
The majority of American voters who think that what happened at the Capitol was not just a natural occurrence broke down among different political parties, with 57% of Democrats thinking that it is either very likely — 34% — or somewhat likely — 23% — while 51% of Republicans said that it is very likely and only 19% of Republicans said that it is somewhat likely.
Based on photos, videos and eyewitness accounts, many people who work for conservative news sources stated that federal agents had been encouraging Donald Trump supporters to enter the Capitol building to bait them so that they would later use them to push their Jan. 6 propaganda, as they did. Among the people who questioned the idea that Trump supporters decided to enter the Capitol building after watching him speak was Tucker Carlson, Fox News host and one of the most famous conservative personalities in the mainstream conservative media.
Not so long ago, Carlson announced that he and his investigative team gained access to the surveillance footage of the in- and outside of the Capitol building and they plan to sort through and release it for the people to see.
The Rasmussen poll also included the question about whether the footage should be released. The whopping majority of both likely male and female voters across political parties and ages — 80% — stated that it is very important to release the footage, with both Republican and Democratic voters saying that the public has the right to see the footage.
