Daily Wire Short-Sells Biden’s Ability to Offend, Laughs Off Christians Being Targeted

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) President Joe Biden’s string of rancid remarks flowed so disgracefully fast in the wake of Monday’s deadly mass shooting, that the popular conservative outlet The Daily Wire sold short the president’s ability to offend.

“This is single handedly the most offensive thing I have ever witnessed from the office of the president,” Tim Meads tweeted Monday in response to Biden’s warped behavior.

It took Biden less than a day to top himself, yukking it up about Christians being slaughtered by a trans triggerman in the mass shooting at Nashville’s Covenant School that left three children and three adults dead.

Instead of acknowledging the deadly gravity of the tragedy, Biden laughed off any suggestion that Christians were targeted, if it meant agreeing with Republican Sen. Josh Hawley.

“Do you believe that Christians were targeted at the Nashville School shooting?” a reporter asked Biden, to which the president responded, “I have no idea.”

“Josh Hawley believes they were,” the reporter noted, drawing a scoff from the uniter-in-chief.

“Well, I probably don’t then,” Biden chortled. “No, I’m joking. No, I have no idea.”

Hawley, who had called for Biden’s FBI and DHS to open a federal hate crime investigation of the shooting, ripped the president’s flippant attitude.

“That is totally beneath the dignity of the office of the presidency of the United States. This is a guy, this is an office, that has the responsibility of leading this country – children are dead,” Hawley told the Ingraham Angle.

“Biden should be acknowledging the targeting of people of faith. He should be saluting the law enforcement officers who put their lives on the line and saved hundreds of kids. But he should be saying we’re going to get to the bottom of this, we’re going to call it for what it is – a hate crime – and we’re going to do a full investigation and make sure it doesn’t happen again.”

J.K. Rowling Replies to Criticisms About Her Past Trans Comments

(Abdul–Rahman Oladimeji Bello, Headline USA) Author J.K. Rowling responded to critics regarding her comments about transgender women in recent years. 

The author replied while speaking with The Free Press’ podcast host Megan Phelips-Roper on Tuesday’s “The Witch Trails of J.K. Rowling.” According to Fox News, the podcast host noted comments from one of her critics, Youtuber Natalie Wynn, who had also appeared on the “Witch Trials” podcast.

Wynn had accused Rowlings of “indirect bigotry,” saying that the author was only “undermining people’s rights” while pretending to care. 

“I see this constantly and the most frequent example of that is ‘they’re pretending to be concerned about children. It’s not about the children. They really hate trans people,” Rowlings said in response to the accusations.

“Now, if you’re saying the indirect bigotry is asking questions where you believe significant harm is done, if you’re saying indirect bigotry is standing up for women’s rights, then you know what, guilty as charged,” Rowlings said. “I think it is a very bad faith argument to say that people who are asking questions are being indirect bigots because, you know, that itself, in my view, is a very bad faith position.”

The podcast host then asked Rowling if she understood how much pain her comment about trans women not being “quite” women could have caused. 

“The thing is, women are the only group, to my knowledge, that are being asked to embrace members of their oppressor class unquestioningly with no caveat,” Rowling responded. “This movement has argued, continues to argue, that a man may have had no surgery whatsoever, but if he feels himself to be a woman, the door of every woman’s bathroom, changing room, rape center should be open to him. And I say, no. I’m afraid I say no.”

Rowling then went on to ask why the pain of a particular group is prioritized over the pain of other groups, suggesting that trans people’s ‘pain’ has become more of a priority than that of women.

Trump Hires Second New Hampshire Campaign Veteran Who Worked for Bush

(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) President Donald Trump has hired a veteran Bush campaigner from New Hampshire to run his campaign in one of the leading primary states after recent reports show Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis as very competitive in the state, a seemingly awkward marriage of necessity.

Trevor Naglieri was hired as Trump’s New Hampshire state director, according to two anonymous “GOP operatives familiar with the move,” reported Politico.

Naglieri was a field coordinator for Jeb! 2016. He also served as Ted Cruz’s New Hampshire field director before becoming Cruz’s 2016 national field director.

His resume is not what one would expect for a Trump campaign, but with Trump facing new pressure in New Hampshire and Iowa, Trump needs to boost his influence.

Naglieri’s performance in New Hampshire, all things considered, was impressive. In 2016 Jeb! the lowest energy candidate imaginable, took fourth in New Hampshire with 11%, Ted Cruz took third earning 12%, Kasich took 16% and Trump won the primary with 35%, according to NBC News.

He is Trump’s second big campaign hire relating to New Hampshire for the 2024 election. In January, President Trump rehired his former campaign co-chair and outgoing two term New Hampshire GOP Chair Stephen Stepanek, according to Politico.

President Trump commented on the hire.

“If he wasn’t coming with us, I might just have to forget about New Hampshire and just mark it down as a loss,” he said. “But with Steve, I don’t think we can lose.”

Karoline Leavitt, an ex-Trump staffer and former New Hampshire congressional candidate explained the importance of the hire.

“It’s a big deal,” she said. “He was just the leader of our entire state party. I think that sends a clear message to the rest of the Republican field that may be wanting to get in that New Hampshire is Trump’s territory.”

New Hampshire might be a big part of President Trump’s strategy. In 2016 he barely lost the state to Hillary Clinton, winning 46.2% of the vote to her 42.7%, according to Politico. In 2020, he lost by a slightly higher margin, 45% to 52%.

With the surge of DeSantis, Trump may be looking for a strong staff to lock down the state.

And as the rivalry heats up in early voting primary states, more awkward pairings seem possible as the level of competition rises and as Trump threatens to blackball DeSantis staffers.

EPA Under Fire over Handling of Billions in New Funds

(Casey Harper, The Center Square) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is in hot water after regulators seemed to suggest they had more money than they could spend but needed to spend it anyway.

That funding came in part from the Inflation Reduction Act, and now lawmakers are pointing to watchdog reports showing rampant waste, fraud and abuse could become a major issue for the environmental agency.

Morgan Griffith, R-Va., led a hearing Wednesday where lawmakers heard from several experts, including Sean O’Donnell, the inspector general for the EPA. Griffith pointed to the national deficit, raising questions about how the EPA is using federal funds in a time of rising debt.

“Of course, numerous factors impact the federal budget outlook, but one thing is certain,” he said at the hearing. “Over the past two years, your federal government has been spending taxpayer dollars like it was Monopoly money.”

House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., Griffith and Rep. Bill Johnson, R-Ohio, sent a letter to the EPA Tuesday raising concerns about EPA’s use of funds after controversial comments on the EPA website.

“In an informational video posted on its website, an EPA representative stated, ‘we have to spend all three billion dollars of the IRA funding for environment and climate justice by September 30th of 2026, that is less than four years from today, every dollar has got to be out the door from EPA or it disappears, and it goes back to the Treasury”’ the letter said.

The lawmakers argue that rush to spend can lead to rampant waste, fraud and abuse.

“For example, GAO examined lessons learned from grant management of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 funding and noted that President Obama’s push to spend funds quickly created a ‘large spike in spending’ for some agencies, and that this law required an accelerated rollout of funding,” the letter said. “As a result, GAO concluded that some federal agencies encountered oversight challenges.”

The questions come as Congressional Republicans also work to roll back the EPA Waters of the United States rule, which gives the federal government broad power over even small local ponds.

The lawmakers called for documents and answers about how funding will be used, pointing out the EPA does not have a perfect track record. Federal watchdogs have raised similar concerns.

“EPA’s grant programs have suffered historically from documented shortcomings,” the letter said. “For example, the EPA Office of the Inspector General (OIG) previously concluded that EPA needed to strengthen controls over its grants, including recipient monitoring and accurate reporting of grants data. Previous OIG and Government Accountability Office (GAO) reviews also found that EPA needed to establish clear guidance and monitor grants and cooperative agreements appropriately. According to the EPA OIG, a heightened risk of fraud accompanies the recent influx of funding.”

Mayorkas Supports Assault Weapons Ban but Can’t Define Assault Weapons

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) In a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on oversight of the Department of Homeland Security, its secretary, Alejandro Mayorkas, said he supported a federal assault weapons but couldn’t define what an assault weapon is.

U.S. Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., asked Mayorkas, ”Do you agree with the president that we should ban the private ownership of assault weapons in America?”

“I do,” he replied.

Kennedy then asked, “What is an assault weapon?”

Mayorkas replied, “an AK-47.”

“Can you give me a specific definition other than pointing to a specific weapon?” Kennedy asked.

Mayorkas replied by stating he used to be a federal prosecutor in the late 1980s in California and that those in law enforcement he worked with support an assault weapons ban.

Kennedy replied, “Do you know why we get so frustrated with you? Because you won’t give straight answers.”

“I just did,” Mayorkas said.

“No you didn’t,” Kennedy replied. “Do you have a definition of an assault weapon?” he asked again.

“I’m confident there is a technical definition,” Mayorkas replied.

Mayorkas had previously refused to give direct answers to questions posed by Texas Republican Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn.

When questioned by Cruz, Mayorkas refused to answer yes or no questions or sat in silence. He also said he didn’t know data publicly available and published by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, an agency he oversees.

Mayorkas said no murderers had been released into the country under his watch, a claim in direct opposition to CBP data. He also said he didn’t know how many foreign nationals had died trying to enter the country illegally, how many terrorists had been apprehended attempting to cross the border, and didn’t know about bracelets that cartels use to keep track of the people they are smuggling across the border.

At one point, Cruz, in disbelief of his answers, told Mayorkas, “If you have any integrity, you’d resign.”

Kennedy also asked Mayorkas, “Our southern border is not secure, is it?”

“When I speak of security I’m speaking of maximizing resources to make sure we have the most effective results,” Mayorkas replied.

“So it’s secure because we’re trying to secure it?” Kennedy asked. “Are we succeeding?”

“We are so focused on the security of our southern border we are doing so much,” Mayorkas replied.

Kennedy listed the record number of illegal foreign nationals entering the country, the record number of gotaways, the record number of terrorists, and other categories he said were the highest under the Biden administration “in the history of ever.”

The National Border Patrol Council, the union representing Border Patrol agents, took issue with claims Mayorkas made denying how Mexican cartels use groups of hundreds of people to pull Border Patrol from the line, called “task saturation.” It’s a strategy employed to burden Border Patrol agents with processing paperwork, pulling them from the field and line of defense, so the border is left open for cartels to smuggle people and drugs. Border Patrol chiefs explained this tactic in testimony given at House and Senate committee hearings earlier this year.

Mayorkas claiming “cartels don’t use illegal aliens to tie up BP agents, which allows them to smuggle other items across the border,” the NBPC said, “is a lie. Cartels don’t profit billions because they’re stupid. Leftists like Mayorkas profit because they think the American people are stupid.”

It posted a picture of Mayorkas on social media, stating, “A national disgrace.”

Sen. Rubio: ‘Woke Activists’ Are Hollowing Out Our Military

(Casey Harper, The Center Square) U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio blasted the Pentagon’s increasingly leftward bent as it struggles to keep up with national security interests.

“The United States military is the greatest fighting force in the world, but woke activists in the Biden Administration are undermining military readiness, cohesion, and purpose,” Rubio, R-Fla., told The Center Square. “We cannot allow these left-wing crazies to hollow out our military. The world is an increasingly dangerous place and America’s security requires a strong military capable of deterring – and if need be, defending – our nation.”

Rubio’s comments come after The Center Square reported that the Pentagon is struggling to fulfill military requests even as it increasingly gives attention, and funds, to diversity, gender and critical race theory issues.

The Pentagon would struggle to manufacture enough precision missiles if conflict with China broke out, reports indicate. That comes after the U.S. sent over a decades worth of Stinger missiles to Ukraine as soon as the war there broke out, one of multiple shortages or potential shortages exposed by the U.S.’ support for Ukraine.

Critics argue the military has become distracted. For example, a recent Department of Defense Comptroller report points to $86.5 million for “dedicated diversity and inclusion activities.”

“The Department will lead with our values – building diversity, equity, and inclusion into everything we do,” the report said.

In a hearing earlier this week, Subcommittee on National Security, the Border and Foreign Affairs Chairman Glenn Grothman, R-Wisc., raised concerns about “progressive ideals” infiltrating the military.

“We all know that the primary mission of the Armed Forces is to protect and defend the nation and our interests abroad,” Grothman said. “However, the military is not the institution for social experiments and political correctness. This Administration seems to be willfully blinded by how its progressive ideals are affecting military readiness and recruitment.”

GOP lawmakers have introduced legislation to ban the teaching of critical race theory in the military as well as cut off the funding for the diversity offices that push these ideas, but the legislation has not gotten enough traction.

Grothman said the liberalization of the military is hurting recruitment, which has become more difficult in recent years. The Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps all failed to meet their recruiting goals last year.

“Despite lowering fitness standards, relaxing tattoo policies, and increasing recruiting bonuses, fewer and fewer young adults are joining our military ranks,” he said. “Meanwhile, the Biden Administration is more focused on how cadets at military academies use the correct pronouns rather than learn how to lead, work as a team, and defend our nation.

“The Biden Administration thinks that service members understanding ‘white rage’ – as recently described by General Mark Milley, our highest-ranking military official – is more important than promoting cohesiveness throughout the armed forces,” he added.

Rubio and U.S. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, commissioned a report on these kinds of concerns that was released last year. It showed several examples of gender and racial ideology in U.S. military training, policies and leadership.

In one case, official training materials for West Point cadets lecture them on white privilege. The report points to another example where a slide presentation for the Air Force Academy is titled, “Diversity & Inclusion: What it is, why we care, & what we can do.” This taxpayer-funded training warns cadets to avoid using gendered language, which includes terms like “mom” and “dad.”

Drag Queen Straddles Young Student at School’s LGBT Pride Event

(Abdul–Rahman Oladimeji Bello, Headline USA) A viral video obtained by Libs of TikTok shows a large, biological male drag queen straddling a female student at an LGBTQ Pride event hosted by a public college in North Carolina.

In the video, event attendees laughed and watched as a drag queen gave a female student a hyper-sexualized lap dance. 

Fox News reported that Forsyth Technical Community College has two on-campus high school programs. The public college begins enrollment in ninth grade and enrolls students as young as 14. School officials told Libs of TikTok that student events were open to all students in the college.

“These students, like all college students, are open to attend any student event,” the school said. “Forsyth Tech is committed to being a place of promise for our students. In order to fulfill that promise, we have clearly spelled out our mission, vision and equity statements.”

Forsyth Tech’s Pride Club reportedly lured kids to the drag show with free food and drinks as part of a Pride Festival the club promoted.

The county’s public health director claimed its “staff is committed to meeting the people we serve where they are. We believe we assign an appropriate amount of attention on the LGBTQIA community around education and prevention of sexually transmitted infections.”

The director said that health department staff was aware of the performances on campus, but disavowed “the actions that allegedly took place,” he told Fox, claiming his department was “not involved with planning the event and had no information regarding the age of the attendees.”

Public backlash over the event’s reported inclusion of minors was fierce.

“Unless that student was 18, this was sexual assault since it undoubtedly lacked parental consent,” tweeted a security officer, while another user asked, “how can you defend this? that’s a full grown man on top of a teenager.. i’m disgusted.”

Headline USA’s Mark Pellin contributed to this report

Adidas Suddenly Drops Trademark Complaint against BLM

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) Woke sports-apparel corporation Adidas appears to have been kowed by fear of backlash after suggesting that the race-baiting, neo-Marxist group Black Lives Matter had infringed on its brand identity.

The German-based company said in a filing to the U.S. Trademark Office on Monday that a three-striped BLM design was “confusingly” similar to its own iconic logo. 

However, Adidas retracted the complaint on Wednesday.

“Adidas will withdraw its opposition to the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation’s trademark application as soon as possible,” said a company statement, according to NBC News.

The Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation had applied for a federal trademark featuring a yellow three-stripe design.

Adidas has been using its logo since as early as 1949, when it was first registered on a football boot.

Since then, the company said the logo has acquired “tremendous public recognition,” according to Monday’s filing.

Adidas also has fiercely defended it over the years, with 90-plus lawsuits and over 200 settlement agreements since 2008.

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in January decided in favor of Thom Browne Inc., finding that their use of two, three and four-stripe designs on their apparel and footwear did not violate Adidas’ trademark rights.

The decision was made after a jury trial initiated by Adidas. In the complaint, Adidas stated that the stripe patterns were similar to the Adidas mark.

However, after a full examination of the facts of the case, the jury ultimately decided in favor of Thom Browne, affirming their right to use the stripes designs in question.

Mississippi Woman Charged w/ Husband’s Murder, Which Streamed on Facebook Live

(Robert Jonathan, Headline USA) Authorities have charged a woman with murder for  allegedly killing her husband after the couple bickered in their home during a Facebook Live stream.

The shooting, which was broadcast on social media, occurred in Lowndes County, Mississippi, in the Columbus area. The investigation remains ongoing as local law-enforcement officials await the results of an autopsy.

According to a statement from the Lowndes County Sheriff’s Office, the argument early Saturday morning between Kadejah Michelle Brown and Jeremy Brown, both 28, “turned physical,” and that “This incident was captured on audio / video on Facebook live.”

A preliminary investigation determined that Jeremy Brown died at the scene from a single gunshot wound. Deputies, who were responding to a domestic violence call, also found a handgun and a shell casing in the home, WLBT reported.

Kadejah Brown is being held at the Lowndes County jail subject to a court-imposed bond of $750,000.

In a video uploaded to YouTube that purports to be the livestream in question, she is heard accusing her husband—who apparently was in the process of leaving the apartment to go to work—of spending insufficient time taking care of the kids.

At one point in the escalating quarrel, Jeremy can be heard telling his wife stop touching him.

The disturbing footage goes audio-only before a shot rings out and one or more kids start crying along with screaming adults.

Prior to the gunshot, Kadejah can be heard saying “I’ll kill your a**, b**ch,” the Daily Mail reported.

In the immediate aftermath, she also seems to say “I don’t wanna go to jail,” although the audio is far from clear.

A grandmother was apparently also in the room at the time of the confrontation.

Sheriff Eddie Hawkins told the Columbus-based Commercial Dispatch that “The phone had been thrown down, and then you heard the shot.”

In the statement from the law-enforcement agency, Hawkins added that the couple had a troubled marriage.

“There was a history of domestic violence between Brown and the victim,” said the statement.

“This was a tragic and senseless murder and our thoughts and prayers go out to the family of the victim,” it continued. “Fortunately, [Kadejah] Brown is in custody and we look forward to the criminal justice system holding her accountable.”

It has not been determined as to why the quarrel went live on Facebook in the first place. The sheriff told CBS Jackson affiliate WCBI that the Browns had spent much of the previous evening arguing.

The couple, who celebrated their anniversary earlier this month, apparently were the parents of four kids.

O’Keefe Reports Democrat Donation-Laundering Operation Using Senior Citizens’ Identities

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Investigative reporter James O’Keefe is back with his first bombshell report since leaving Project Veritas earlier this year—this one investigating what seems to be a massive Democrat-run donation-laundering scheme.

The newly formed O’Keefe Media Group posted a preview of its investigation on Tuesday.

“The O’Keefe Media Group broke its first story investigating what appears to be a national plot to utilize senior citizens matching a similar profile as vehicles to launder millions of dollars into political campaigns,” the new media group touted.

Donation aggregators, such as ActBlue, have raised significant questions when it comes to campaign finance, including criticism that they allow dark-money megadonors to mask their donations as smaller ones and potentially bypass caps on individual contributions as mandated by the Federal Election Commission.

O’Keefe said he had uncovered FEC data showing that senior citizens have had their identities used—unbeknownst to them—to make thousands of donations to the Biden presidential campaign and other candidates.

For instance, one senior citizen was listed as having made 12,000 contributions for $217,000 over a three-year span. Another senior’s identity was tied to 3,040 donations for $31,282 since 2020.

O’Keefe’s preview shows him door-stepping some of the senior citizens listed, to see if they were aware their names were being used.

One woman, Cindy Nowe, told O’Keefe that she’s donated to the campaign “once in a while.” But when O’Keefe asked her if she donated nearly $19,000, she said, “I doubt that.”

“I wish I could have donated $18k to Biden’s presidency,” she said.

Likewise, another woman, Carolyn Lenz of Tucson, Arizona, was incredulous when O’Keefe approached her about being connected to 18,872 donations for some $170,000 since 2017

“Absolutely not,” she said when asked if that was really her. “No, no, no, no no.”

When another man, Garland Riggs, made a similar denial, O’Keefe told him, “It appears someone else is committing a crime using your address.”

O’Keefe said he has “hundreds” of similar addresses connected to this apparent money-laundering scam that he’s yet to investigate fully. He is seeking “an army of investigators” to help him expose corruption.

“You can do this too and I’m going to help you!” he tweeted shortly after the preview of his investigation was released.

O’Keefe Media Group has not indicated when the next installment of its investigation will be released.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.