Biden-Bribery Whistleblowers Missing, GOP Warns: ‘They Fear for Their Lives’

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) In a shocking revelation, Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., warned in an interview with Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo Sunday that House Republicans lost track of a crucial witness in the ongoing GOP-led investigation concerning bombshell allegations of President Joe Biden’s involvement in a bribery scheme.

Comer, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, cited a credible witness’s testimony who went missing after House Republicans held a press conference on Wednesday detailing how the Biden family earned millions of dollars from a handful of U.S. foes, including China and Romania.

“Unfortunately, we can’t track down the informant. We’re hopeful that the informant is still there,” Comer told Bartiromo.

“We have basic information with respect to what the informant has alleged, and it’s very serious. It alleges that Joe Biden, when he was vice president, was involved in a quid pro quo with a foreign country in exchange for foreign aid,” he later added.

The alleged informant took evidence to the FBI that claimed then-Vice President Biden was embroiled in a “quid pro quo” with a foreign national. But the missing informant could serve as a significant setback for the House Oversight Committee, which is aggressively probing the business dealings and several shell companies owned by the Biden family.

The FBI has refused to assist House Republicans in their pursuit of financial documents related to the alleged quid pro quo. Earlier this month, Comer subpoenaed FBI records, including an alleged June 2020 memo that breaks down the dire claims.  FBI officials, however, refused to turn over the report.

In the interview with Bartiromo, Comer slammed the FBI for its refusal to collaborate in his investigation.

“All the FBI has to do is say, yeah, we looked into it and it wasn’t a credible informant,” Comer said. “But they won’t answer our questions.”

Bartiromo responded by calling the new revelations jaw-dropping. “This is absolutely extraordinary and it is stunning that some people are missing that you need to prove this. Who in the White House is intimidating these people? Do you know?” she asked.

Comer’s assessment was echoed by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green, R-Ga., in an interview with War Room host and former Trump advisor Steve Bannon.

“Now, the truth that I can tell everyone this morning is we have not lost the submarine,” Greene told Bannon. “That whistleblower is very safe. But he does fear for his life, and rightfully so.”

Green credited Sen. Chuck Grassley who facilitated the whistleblower to House Republicans.

“That whistleblower came through for us, thankfully, through the help of Senator Grassley,” she explained. “But other whistleblowers, yes, they are missing. They’re either in court, they’re in jail, or we cannot talk with them at this time because they can’t be found,” she continued, later adding that the findings would “bring down the president of United States.”

Watch the full May 10 press conference here:

MSM, Dems Give SCOTUS Justice KBJ Pass on Finance Scandal

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) In a striking display of hypocrisy, the Democrat Party, along with the mainstream media, is facing mounting criticism for ignoring scathing financial findings against leftist Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, while hyping dubious reports against conservative Justice Clarence Thomas. 

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is reportedly considering a hearing to address the Supreme Court’s mishandling of Thomas’s failure to disclose his wife’s income earnings. During the 2000s, Thomas omitted Ginni Thomas’s salaries from the Heritage Foundation and Hillsdale College in his Supreme Court financial disclosure filings. However, he rectified the mistake in 2011 upon being alerted to the mishaps.

“When the issue is potentially unlawful conduct by a sitting Supreme Court justice, transparency is essential for accountability and to instill public confidence in the outcome,” Whitehouse claimed of the decade-old error.

Whitehouse, however, remained radio silent on disclosure errors found in a Senate hearing by Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., amid the same time when the mainstream media torched Thomas. Jackson had during her confirmation hearings revised earlier statements and copped to having had “inadvertently omitted” key financial disclosures.

“Justice Jackson made multiple amendments three days after President Biden nominated her,” Kennedy said. Those “amendments” included money that her husband had received from consulting on medical malpractice cases, and also new details on board memberships and travel reimbursements dating back to at least 2014.

Kennedy also slammed the Democrat Party for hypocritically turning a blind to the findings

“Not one senator brought that up during her confirmation hearings,” he said. “Not one of my colleagues here walked into her hearings with the buckets of mud that they’ve thrown against Justice Thomas. Not one.”  

Kennedy’s slap-down of the Democrats was echoed by Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., who in an interview with CNN’s Abby Phillips, questioned why the media protected Jackson, the Court’s most leftist justice, amid the dire financial findings. 

Phillips asked Donalds whether he had evidence of a leftist justice failing to disclose financial earnings in these reports, to which Donalds replied positively. 

“Oh actually, I do,” Donalds said. “A report just came out that Justice Jackson, Ketanji Brown Jackson. She didn’t disclosure consulting income her husband had. She failed to disclose that.”

‘Jesus Values’ Score Big Legal Win over Woke, Cat-Eared School Board

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) An ultra-woke school board conceded the errors of its leftist ways and settled a religious discrimination case after earlier this year terminating a contract with Arizona Christian University.

The Washington Elementary School District, led by a self-identifying “neurodivergent Queer Black Latina” who wears cat ears, agreed earlier this month to reinstate ACU’s long-running teaching contract after two months ago voting to cancel it because the university held Christian beliefs.

School board member Tamillia Valenzuela, the “dope ass human, neurodivergent Queer Black Latina,” said during a March meeting that she “full-heartedly” believed in religious freedom,” but was alarmed by the university’s website that stated “above all else, be committed to Jesus Christ, accomplishing His will and advancing His kingdom on earth as in heaven.”

Continuing it partnership with ACU would adversely impact the district’s LGBT community and send the wrong message to students, Valenzuela argued.

The board agreed and killed the contract, which was entering its eleventh year, prompting ACU to partner with Alliance Defending Freedom and file a religious discrimination lawsuit.

In the settlement, the school district agreed to restore its contract with ACU and to pay $25,000 in attorneys’ fees.

The new contract reached under the settlement came with added benefit, allowing for “an additional five years, to be renewed annually, instead of being the final year of the previous 5-year agreement,” the university said in a statement.

“This is a complete vindication of the rights of our students to be able to participate as student-teachers in a public school district without fear of religious discrimination,” said ACU President Len Munsil. “We obtained everything we wanted in this new agreement, without any sacrifice or compromise to our beliefs and our university’s religious purpose.”

The school district’s governing board president, Nikkie Gomez-Whaley, said the district was ready to move forward “to continuing the work of creating welcoming and accessible education spaces that meet the needs of our students, staff and community.”

ADF senior counsel David Cortman said the settlement was a win not only for ACU, but also for students.

“At a time when a critical shortage of qualified, caring teachers exists, the Washington Elementary School District board did the right thing by prioritizing the needs of elementary school children and agreeing to partner once again with ACU’s student-teachers,” Cortman said.

MTG Says Hunter Biden’s Hookers May Testify Before Congress

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The House Oversight Committee with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., as a lead considers bringing before Congress both American and foreign prostitutes who serviced Hunter Biden.

“We’re going to track down these women and talk to them and if there is a credible reason that we need to bring them in front of the Oversight Committee then absolutely we will do that. Especially when it involves our national security,” Greene told the New York Post.

“I’ve been talking about it with [committee] Chairman [James] Comer and we’re already working in that direction.”

Greene, a committee member, is one of a few people who is authorized to view banks’ Suspicious Activity Reports relating to Hunter and other members of the Biden family.

She also said that many of the summary pages she saw contained the terms like “this is a known prostitution ring” and “human sex trafficking.”

“There was an entire stack of papers and it was each transaction, each person, each LLC, Hunter Biden’s law firm, Hunter Biden himself and multiple Biden family members — then it was all these prostitutes,” Greene said.

“And you can go through and it gives all the prostitutes’ names, addresses, birthdates, telephone numbers, their passports.”

She then added that it is very important to talk to these prostitutes to find the additional truth regarding the corrupt Biden family.

“We need to talk to them, especially the ones from Russia and Ukraine… We need to find out where they were with Hunter Biden,” Green said.

“Did they go in the White House when [Joe Biden] was vice president? We just need to know these things. Where they’ve been, what they know, what they’ve seen, what they’ve heard.”

In addition, she also said that it is possible that some of the foreign prostitutes Hunter slept with were spies who could’ve found out about something, thus compromising sensitive information.

Former ICE Chief: Biden Border Policies ‘Greatest National Security Threat Since 9/11’

(By Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) The former acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement under the Trump administration says the Biden administration’s border policies are creating a national security threat that are “almost treasonous.”

Tom Homan made the claim as U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office of Field Operation agents have so far apprehended 332 known or suspected terrorists this fiscal year to date. This includes 125 caught at the southern border and 207 at the northern border.

It’s the unknown that keeps Homan and others in law enforcement up at night, he said.

At a recent town hall event in El Paso organized by the Texas Public Policy Foundation, Homan spoke on a panel expressing his fear that another terrorist attack against Americans could occur as a direct result of Biden administration policies.

“This administration has created such a crisis that it’s not about immigration anymore. It’s about border security,” he said. “When you cause a crisis this big and take 70% of agents off the line, that makes the border vulnerable.”

With the public health authority Title 42’s end and more people entering the U.S., more agents are pulled off the line, making the border more vulnerable, Homan said. “That means more fentanyl is coming across to kill more Americans. That means more women and children will be trafficked across that border,” he said. “That means more migrants are going to die. That means more known, suspected terrorists are going to cross that border.”

“What’s happening is the greatest national security threat since 9/11,” he continued. “Border Patrol has arrested people from 171 countries. Many of these countries are sponsors of terrorism.”

Homan also pointed to the record number of gotaways, those who’ve illegally entered the U.S. and evaded capture by law enforcement, which total over 1.7 million reported by Border Patrol agents since the president’s been in office.

“If you don’t think a single one of the 1.7 million is coming from a country that sponsors terrorism, then you’re ignoring the data,” he said. “That’s what makes this a huge national security issue.”

The Biden administration has maintained the border is closed while also expanding entry through the use of a CBPOne App, opening asylum offices overseas, and sending thousands of federal employees to the border to “scale up processing efforts.”

And while Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas claimed Trump administration policies were inhumane, Homan argues Biden administration policies are inhumane.

“People in this administration think its policies are humane,” Homan said, “but they’re killing Americans in record numbers. They’re killing migrants in record numbers. Since Joe Biden’s been president, over 1,700 migrants have died on US soil.”

What’s happening isn’t “mismanagement,” he said. “This isn’t incompetence. This is by design. They ran on open border policies.

“This is about public safety and national security. Mark my words, I don’t know how many terrorist have come across the border but some day we’re going to find out and it will be a bad day for this country.”

Homan said the Biden administration was facilitating millions of people coming to the U.S. illegally and going to so-called sanctuary cities on purpose.

“The millions of people heading to sanctuary cities will be counted in the next census,” he said. When seats are apportioned for Congress, he said, “that’s going to create more seats in Congress for Democrats. They sold this country out. It’s almost treasonous.”

Biden, Legislative Leaders Slated to Meet Tuesday on Debt Limit

(By Brett Rowland, The Center Square) President Joe Biden and congressional leaders are expected to meet again Tuesday, 16 days before the United States is projected to default on its debt.

Republicans have said they won’t agree to raise the debt limit without spending cuts. House Republicans recently passed a bill to reduce spending by almost $5 trillion and increase the debt limit by about $1.5 trillion, or until March 31, 2024, whichever comes first.

The Republican bill would strip energy and environmental tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act and formally block Biden’s student loan cancellation. It also would put work requirements in place for some federal social programs, such as requiring Medicaid recipients to work 80 hours per month.

Biden was asked about work requirements Sunday evening at Gordons Pond State Park near Rehoboth Beach, Delaware.

“I voted for tougher aid programs that’s in the law now, but for Medicaid it’s a different story,” Biden said. “And so I’m waiting to hear what their exact proposal is.”

Biden and Democrats have said Congress must raise the debt limit before discussing changes to spending or other budget changes.

On Sunday, Biden said that while it “never is good to characterize a negotiation in the middle of a negotiation,” he was optimistic.

“I remain optimistic because I’m a congenital optimist,” he said. “But I really think there’s a desire on their part, as well as ours, to reach an agreement, and I think we’ll be able to do it.”

Biden said he would meet with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on Tuesday at the White House. A meeting set for Friday had been canceled.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said lawmakers must raise the debt ceiling by June 1 or risk a default on U.S. debt obligations.

The U.S. government faces a significant risk of not being able to pay its bills in the coming weeks without an increase to the debt limit, the Congressional Budget Office said Friday.

The debt ceiling is the maximum amount of debt the U.S. Department of the Treasury can issue.

“The Congressional Budget Office projects that if the debt limit remains unchanged, there is a significant risk that at some point in the first two weeks of June, the government will no longer be able to pay all of its obligations,” according to a CBO report released Friday.

The CBO report warned of consequences if the U.S. were to come up short on cash: “Those actions could result in distress in credit markets, disruptions in economic activity, and rapid increases in borrowing rates for the Treasury.”

Illinois Eyes Law for Items Hanging off Rearview Mirrors

(By Zeta Cross, The Center Square) Illinois is one of a handful of states that bans hanging rosaries, air freshener tags or disability signs on a rearview mirror. A new bill may change that and prevent future headaches and irate confrontations with law enforcement.

“Even though it is in the driver handbook, most people don’t pay attention to it,” Rep. La Shawn Ford, D-Chicago, told The Center Square. “They don’t even realize that it is against the law. The police know it is a violation. And remember, the police are responsible for pulling people over because the law says that they have to. It makes no sense.”

Ford’s House Bill 2389, which would no longer require law enforcement to stop drivers with hanging objects on the rearview mirror, passed the Illinois House with bipartisan support on March 24.

In Minnesota, a police officer killed Chicagoan Daunte Wright two years ago when she stopped him for having an air freshener tag hanging from his rearview mirror. Wright got irate about the stop. The officer reached for her taser gun to subdue him. She grabbed her pistol instead, and Wright was killed.

“If the bill passes the Senate, as we expect, and the governor signs it into law, that is one less responsibility that law enforcement will have to have,” Ford said.

The measure passed the Senate earlier this month and can now be sent to the governor.

When Ford asked Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias to support his effort to get the law off the books, Giannoulias did not hesitate.

“Pulling someone over for merely having an air freshener attached to the rearview mirror is not only archaic, it’s ridiculous,” Giannoulias said in a statement. “Amending the law by prohibiting traffic stops that encourage discriminatory practices will ultimately make our streets safer for both motorists and police officers.”

Ford said it is a safety issue, both for the public and for law enforcement.

“We need to minimize how often police have to have contact with drivers for the safety of both,” Ford said. “A simple traffic stop for this violation can lead to a person being killed by police for a number of reasons. Imagine a police officer pulling someone over for an air freshener or a rosary when there is a killer on the loose. It makes no sense.”

Interest Payments on U.S. Debt Up 41% in March

(By Adam Andrzejewski, RealClear Wire) The cost of financing publicly-held national debt in the U.S. is skyrocketing, with a new report showing that outlays for interest payments are up 41% because of higher interest rates, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

As the Federal Reserve tries to tame inflation by raising interest rates, mortgages and car payments aren’t the only loans with increasing interest payments.

The CBO report found that for the month of March, net outlays for interest on the public debt increased to $90 billion, a 41% increase, “mainly because interest rates are significantly higher than they were in the first six months of fiscal year 2022.”

Even more disturbing: while the amount of debt is increasing and the cost to finance that debt is increasing, total receipts, or the government’s income, is going down.

The same report found that total receipts (mainly tax and fee revenue) in the first half of the 2023 fiscal year are down 3%, totaling $2 trillion. Additionally, corporate income tax receipts decreased by 10%, and receipts from other sources decreased by 31%.

All the while, expenditures, or outlays, increased 13%, reaching $3.1 trillion. This was driven largely by an increase in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid spending. Despite this 13% increase, lawmakers from both parties continue to insist that any cuts to any of these programs are off the table.

Falling income, rising costs, increasing debt and higher interest rates would scare any business into greater fiscal discipline. Unfortunately, legislators insist on continuing to fund costly and inefficient programs like Medicare without adjustments, and the fiscal state of our nation continues to decline.

The Moral Lesson in ‘Office Space’ Everyone Misses

(By Jon Miltimore, FEE) I have a friend who is pretty successful but works in a high-pressure job. Every few years, when the work grind is getting too tough, he has an antidote.

“I take the rest of the day off and go watch Office Space,” he says.

Office Space is that kind of movie. Written and directed by the legendary Mike Judge (of Beavis and Butthead fame), the 1999 dark comedy stars Ron Livingston as one of three disgruntled office workers who struggle to cope with the monotony of their jobs at a Texas-based software company. Though the movie did not break the bank at the box office, it has become a cult classic and iconic representation of cubicle life and corporate bureaucracy.

Peter Gibbons (Livingston) loathes his job, TPS reports, and his many bosses, particularly his martinet supervisor Bill Lumbergh—hilariously portrayed by Gary Cole—who has a habit of asking rhetorical questions before piling more work onto Peter.

“Hello Peter, what’s happening? Ummm, I’m gonna need you to go ahead and come in tomorrow. So if you could be here around 9 that would be great, mmmk… oh oh! and I almost forgot ahh, I’m also gonna need you to go ahead and come in on Sunday too, kay. We ahh lost some people this week and ah, we sorta need to play catch up.”

‘It’s Not That I’m Lazy, I Just Don’t Care’

It’s a relatable problem, and a frustrating one. Peter’s company, Initech, is canning people. This not only has everyone freaked out about losing their job, but now Peter is being “asked” by his boss to work on weekends to make up for it.

Peter naturally feels powerless in the situation. Telling your boss no is hard. And his inability to push back on Lumbergh compounds his misery at work.

Peter’s life takes a turn, however, when he goes to see a hypnotherapist named Dr. Swanson with his girlfriend (who all his friends seem to think is cheating on him). During the session, Dr. Swanson has a heart attack while hypnotizing Peter. But before he keels over we see his hypnotherapy, which was designed to relieve Peter’s work stress, has worked—but a little too well. Suddenly Peter doesn’t care about anything. He sleeps in, misses work, loses his girlfriend (who indeed was cheating on him)—and he couldn’t be happier about it.

We expect this is going to cause problems for Peter. Instead, his life improves in every way. He’s more relaxed and better rested. He picks up the beautiful waitress at Chotchkie’s, Joanna (Jennifer Aniston), and they start to fall in love and watch Kung Fu together in the evenings. He renovates his cubicle and impresses “the Bobs”—two consultants hired to assess which employees are expendable and should be fired—with his candor:

Peter: The thing is, Bob, it’s not that I’m lazy, it’s that I just don’t care.

Bob Porter: Don’t—don’t care?

Peter: It’s a problem of motivation, all right? Now if I work my ass off and Initech ships a few extra units, I don’t see another dime, so where’s the motivation? And here’s something else, Bob: I have eight different bosses right now.

Bob Slydell: I beg your pardon?

Peter: Eight bosses.

Bob Slydell: Eight?

Peter: Eight, Bob. So that means that when I make a mistake, I have eight different people coming by to tell me about it. That’s my only real motivation is not to be hassled, that and the fear of losing my job. But you know, Bob, that will only make someone work just hard enough not to get fired.

Instead of getting fired, Peter gets promoted.

‘Lumbergh Is Not My Problem’

Things can’t stay this good, of course. Especially when we learn Peter’s co-worker friends—Michael Bolton and Samir—are among those slated to be axed at work. The three devise a hair-brained scheme to get back at Initech by stealing from the company in a plan that is foolproof. Except it’s not. And that’s when things begin to unravel. First, Peter is told Joanna slept with Lumbergh, his boss. She didn’t, but they get into an argument when he confronts her about it. They break up. Worst of all, it looks like Peter and his friends are going to prison because they were not laundering from Initech as discreetly as they thought.

This is where the moral that everyone misses in Office Space comes. “You were right about that computer scam. That was a bad idea,” he tells Joanna, explaining that he’s returning the money and going to take blame for the illegal scheme.

Taking the blame is of course the right thing to do and a sign of Peter’s growth, as is his admission that he had no right to get angry at Joanna when he mistakenly believed she had slept with Lumbergh. But what he says next is the single most important sentence in the movie demonstrating Peter’s change.

“Lumbergh is not my problem,” Peter says.

Taking Responsibility

Office Space is a comedy, so naturally Peter doesn’t go to prison. Through a funny turn of events, Initech burns to the ground. The evidence that could implicate Peter, Michael Bolton, and Samir is incinerated. But the arc of the story and of Peter Gibbons comes from his realization that Lumbergh is not really his problem, which helps him discover his own agency.

The best-selling author Robert Mckee, author of Story, says the purpose of a story is to “express how and why life changes.” And these five words—“Lumbergh is not my problem”—represent Peter’s change moment. He leaves Initech, finds a new job, and tells Joanna how he feels.

In a sense, Peter is taking the advice of Jordan Peterson, the best-selling author of 12 Rules for Life. The primary lesson of Peterson’s book is that, in the words of Norman Doidge, “you must take responsibility for your own life. Period.” As I wrote a few years ago, this lesson is embedded in Peterson’s philosophy and best-selling book.

“When Peterson says stand up straight, make good friends, set your own house in order first, tell the truth, make your bed, be precise in speech, etc., he’s not really concerned about how clean your room is. He is instructing readers on how they can take control of their own lives. He’s reminding them of their power. Their agency.”

This is what Peter Gibbons ultimately learns: how to take control of his own life and stop blaming his unhappiness on Lumbergh and Initech.

This is the lesson many people, particularly younger ones who see America as a “capitalist hellscape,” can take from Office Space. It’s not that Lumbergh and Initech weren’t awful. But the truth is, you’re going to encounter awful people in life. What’s important is to not give one’s power and agency over to others by seeing oneself as a victim of external forces beyond one’s control.

This is precisely what Peter was doing at the beginning of Office Space. He turned Lumbergh into his personal boogeyman. Instead of directly engaging his pushy boss, he was hiding from him (quite literally) and feeling sorry for himself. This was making him miserable.

Peter had walked into what Ayaan Hirsi Ali, author of Infidel, calls the “resentment trap.”

“It is probably the worst mental prison in the world,” says the bestselling author. “It is the inability to let go of anger and the perceived or real injustices we suffer.”

Note that Ali says “perceived or real injustices.” Like Peterson, she’s not saying injustice isn’t real. It is. But we must not allow injustices to consume us, or allow them to strip us of our agency.

The truth is, there are plenty of Bill Lumberghs in the world. (In fact, there are people much, much worse.) Sometimes we have to deal with these people, and that can be difficult. We’ve all had to work with and perhaps report to people who are challenging at one time or another.

But the point of Office Space is an important one: do not relinquish your power to the Bill Lumberghs of the world by seeing yourself as a victim. That is a path to misery.

Calif. Reparations Proposal Gives State Veto Power over Local Real Estate Deals

(Headline USA) Among the California reparations task force’s list of demands is a policy that would allow a state agency to have total veto power over all local real estate deals.

The task force, created by legislation signed by Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2020, formally sent a list of policy recommendations to the state legislature this month, many of which seek to address “housing segregation” and “unjust property takings.”

One such proposal would empower the state to identify cities and counties that have historically redlined and gentrified neighborhoods and then subject all real estate transactions in these areas to state review.

“Identified cities and counties” must “submit all residential land use ordinances for review and approval by a state agency, with the agency rejecting (or requiring modification of) the ordinance if the agency finds that the proposed ordinance will maintain or exacerbate levels of residential racial segregation,” the task force said.

Real estate transactions in these areas should only be approved if the city or county “eliminates a certain degree of housing segregation in its geographic territory,” the proposal adds.

The task force additionally demanded that state lawmakers give “preference in rental housing, home ownership, and business opportunities for those who were displaced or excluded from renting or owning property in agency-assisted housing and business opportunities developed in or adjacent to communities formerly covered by restrictive covenants.”

California Democrats have been quiet about whether or not they will support the reparations task force’s proposals. Newsom initially declined to commit his support, but seemed to back down last week.

“The sensationalized framing in pieces published by outlets like Fox News and others is inaccurate. The Governor looks forward to reviewing the final report — and all recommendations — when complete,” Newsom’s office said in a statement.