CNN Grills Jake Sullivan on Pentagon’s $3B ‘Error’ That Benefits Ukraine

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan was grilled by the far-left media over the recent “accounting error” made by the Pentagon about Ukraine aid, giving the Biden administration another black eye for its ineptness.

In an interview on CNN’s State of the Union, host Jake Tapper confronted Sullivan about the Pentagon’s accounting error of $3 billion that would benefit Ukraine.

“That’s a hell of an accounting error!” Tapper exclaimed.

The host also added the mistake provided fodder to critics of the country’s aid to Ukraine and “critics who say there’s not enough oversight going on. Are you concerned about this accounting error?”

Sullivan explained that the Pentagon potentially overestimated the value of the weapons it had sent to Ukraine.

“That is not money that went out the door and disappeared,” Sullivan said. “It will all be provided in the form of equipment to Ukraine on the battlefield and it would be better to get it right in terms of the accounting up front.” 

The error was possibly caused by an oversight in the Pentagon’s evaluation process. Instead of using the current value of the weapons, officials instead opted to value them at the cost it would take to completely replace them, resulting in some items being valued at an exorbitant amount.

Intentional or a mistake, it could free up more money for weapons as Ukraine is on the verge of a much-anticipated counterattack. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy claimed the offensive delay was because his military was not equipped.

The U.S. has been a supporter of Ukraine since Russia invaded in February 2022, providing nearly $37 billion in military aid to the beleaguered nation. In addition to the military support, the U.S. has also committed over $100 billion in discretionary funding to cover government operations, including salaries and pensions. 

However, widespread corruption allegations started surfacing against Zelenskyy‘s government in recent months, and U.S. officials with the State Department could do little but acknowledge the damning reality: once the money left their hands, there was no telling where it would end up — suspecting corruption by the Ukranian government. 

WNBA Coach Complains that Brittney Griner’s Return to Court Wasn’t a Sell-Out

(Headline USA) WNBA coach Vanessa Nygaard complained this week about the low turnout for Brittney Griner’s second game back following her detainment in Russia.

Griner, who plays for the Phoenix Mercury, faced off against the Los Angeles Sparks over the weekend during a game that attracted just 10,396 fans to the Crypto.com stadium, which can hold 19,000 people. Griner scored 18 points in 25 minutes, a “great” accomplishment that should have been applauded by a sold-out crowd, according to Nygaard.

“I mean, it was great. But like honestly, c’mon now LA. We didn’t sell out the arena for BG?” Nygaard said. “Like, I expected more, you know, to be honest. Right, it was great, it was loud. But how was it not a sellout? How was it not a sellout?”

Among those in attendance were NBA legend Magic Johnson and Vice President Kamala Harris.

Harris tweeted her support for Griner during the game, saying, “Brittney Griner’s return to the court is an inspiration to our nation — and is a testament to her strength and courage.”

On average, Mercury games only draw about 5,600 fans, according to ESPN.

Griner’s return to the court grabbed attention for another reason: the leftist athlete stood for the National Anthem instead of kneeling during it in protest, as had been her wont. When asked why she decided to stand, Griner admitted that her detainment in Russia made her more appreciative of her country.

“You have the right to protest, the right to able to speak out, question, challenge and do all these things. What I went through and everything, it just means a little bit more to me now. So I want to be able to stand. I was literally in a cage and could not stand the way I wanted to,” Griner said after the game

“Just being able to hear my national anthem, see my flag, I definitely want to stand,” she continued. “Now everybody that will not stand or not come out, I totally support them 100%. That’s our right, as an American in this great country.”

GOP Sen. Tim Scott Ready to Launch 2024 Presidential Campaign

(Headline USA) As he launches his presidential campaign on Monday, Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina is officially wading into a GOP primary battle already largely dominated by two commanding figures: former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Scott—the only black Republican senator and one of only three black senators overall—announced the launch of his campaign in his hometown of North Charleston after making it official last week with the Federal Election Commission.

The late morning event took place at Charleston Southern University, Scott’s alma mater and a private school affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention.

Afterward, he planned to spend Tuesday with donors in Charleston before a whirlwind, two-day campaign swing to Iowa and New Hampshire.

Like others in the GOP race—including former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley, former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson and Woke, Inc. author Vivek Ramaswamy—Scott will have to find a way to stand out in a field led by Trump and DeSantis, the latter of whom could announce his own bid as early as this week.

But Scott’s senior advisers note that political environments can shift over the course of a primary campaign, pointing to early in the 2016 race when Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush were seen as the top GOP candidates before Trump became the party’s nominee.

One way Scott, 57, hopes to make his mark is by leaning into more optimistic rhetoric than his conservative rivals.

With his Christian faith an integral part of his political and personal story, Scott often quotes Scripture at his campaign events, weaving his reliance on spiritual guidance into his stump speech and even bestowing the name “Faith in America” on his pre-launch listening tour.

In terms of Scott’s political strength, his team points to his most recent Senate reelection in November, when Scott defeated his Democratic opponent by more than 20 percentage points. Such overwhelming support in a state that votes early in the GOP’s presidential nominating calendar bodes well for Scott’s electability on a larger scale, his advisers say.

There’s also the matter of money. He will enter the 2024 race with more cash on hand than any other presidential candidate in U.S. history. He had $22 million left in his campaign bank account at the end of his 2022 campaign and plans to immediately transfer that to his presidential coffers.

It’s enough money, his team says, to keep Scott on the air with continuous TV ads in early voting states until the first round of votes next year.

On many issues, Scott aligns with mainstream GOP positions. He wants to reduce government spending and restrict abortion, saying he would sign a federal law to prohibit abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy if elected president.

But Scott has pushed the party on some policing overhaul measures since the killing of George Floyd, and he has occasionally criticized Trump’s response to racial tensions.

Throughout their disagreements, though, Scott has maintained a generally cordial relationship with Trump, saying in his book that the former president “listened intently” to his viewpoints on race-related issues.

Trump, in turn, wished Scott good luck in a statement posted Monday on his Truth Social platform.

The good-natured bonhomie is likely an indication that Trump does not consider Scott to be a viable threat in the GOP primary, although it may well signal his aversion to any sort of criticism that might be construed as a racial attack.

When he was appointed to the Senate by then-Gov. Nikki Haley in 2012, Scott became the first black senator from the South since just after the Civil War. Winning a 2014 special election to serve out the remainder of his term made him the first black candidate to win a statewide race in South Carolina since the Reconstruction era.

He has long said his current term, which runs through 2029, would be his last.

Scott rejects the notion that the country is inherently racist and has repudiated the teaching of critical race theory, an academic trend that supplants the socio-economic clashes underlying traditional Marxism with a race-based framework instead to assert the presence of “white privilege” in everything.

“Hear me clearly: America is not a racist country,” Scott has said. “It’s backwards to fight discrimination with different types of discrimination. And it’s wrong to try to use our painful past to dishonestly shut down debates in the present.”

If Scott were successful, he would be the first black person to win the Republican presidential nomination and the second elected to the presidency, following Barack Obama in 2008.

In a video announcing his exploratory committee earlier this year, Scott positioned himself as the antidote to the radical left: a self-made success story as the son of a single mother who overcame poverty.

He also bemoaned Democratic leaders as needlessly dividing the country by fostering a “culture of grievance.”

Other Republicans are still deciding whether to wade into the presidential race, including former Vice President Mike Pence, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Miami Mayor Francis Suarez.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Country Star Travis Tritt Hints At Boycott of Fox News

(Headline USA) Country artist Travis Tritt suggested conservatives should launch their next boycott against Fox News over its ousting of Tucker Carlson.

The Grammy-winning singer liked a tweet from conservative commentator Rogan O’Handley over the weekend saying he had canceled his Fox News subscription since the network parted ways with Carlson.

“Haven’t donated to the RNC since they installed Ronna Romney McDaniel. Haven’t drank a Bud Light since they went Woke. Haven’t watched Fox News since they got rid of Tucker. And I’m not alone,” O’Handley wrote.

Tritt also liked a tweet from Juanita Broaddrick, who alleged she was assaulted by former President Bill Clinton when he was serving as attorney general of Arkansas. In the tweet, Broaddrick shared an article claiming Sean Hannity will be taking over Carlson’s 8 p.m. slot and said, “Still not watching. You?”

Fox News denied reports that Hannity will be replacing Carlson.

Tritt was one of several country artists who publicly split with Anheuser-Busch after one of its brands, Bud Light, partnered with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney.

“I will be deleting all Anheuser-Busch products from my tour hospitality rider. I know many other artists who are doing the same,” Tritt said last month.

Tritt noted in later tweets that he “was on a tour sponsored by Budweiser in the ’90s,” back in the day when Anheuser–Busch, among numerous other corporations, was “American-owned.”

He added that many other artists were boycotting the company without making a public announcement, out of “fear of being ridiculed and canceled.”

“I have no such fear,” he wrote.

Bud Light’s sales have continued to crater in recent weeks, leading the company to consider buying back unsold cases of beer from wholesalers. Nationwide retail sales of Bud Light sales dropped 23.6% versus a year ago during the week of May 6 — slightly down from the 23.3% decline for the week that ended April 29, according to data from Bump Williams Consulting and NielsenIQ data.

Biographer: Tucker Carlson Was About to Expose Ray Epps before Show Was Canceled

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Tucker Carlson’s biographer revealed Monday that the former Fox News host was planning to talk about Jan. 6 provocateur Ray Epps when his show was taken off the air.

“I’ve seen the monologue Tucker planned to deliver April 24, before his show was abruptly taken off the air,” said Chadwick Moore, author of the forthcoming Carlson biography, Tucker.

“That monologue dealt with, among other things, investigations around January 6, and particularly Ray Epps—the only person captured on video inciting people to violence at the Capitol that day, and allegedly an FBI informant who still hasn’t been arrested or charged.”

Moore also corroborated reports that Carlson was released as part of Fox’s settlement with Dominion Voting Systems—both entities being partially owned by globalist investment firm BlackRock.

“Although Dominion has denied this, my sources with intimate knowledge of the situation assured me that is in fact the truth,” he said. “That means a small group of people with controlling interest in Dominion silenced the most influential conservative voice in the country, possibly until after the next presidential election.”

Additionally, Moore said Carlson was planning to criticize government officials, such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., who had been calling for him to be taken off the air.

Carlson appeared to confirm Moore’s information, tweeting the “looking eyeballs” emoji in response.

Moore didn’t provide any more details about what Carlson had planned that night in terms of Epps, who has recently hinted at suing Carlson and Revolver News for propagating allegations that he was an agent provocateur working for the government.

Revolver News’s Darren Beattie has stuck by his reporting—though he’s warned that Epps is likely not an FBI informant, as Moore said, but instead a contractor for another government agency or cutout organization.

Meanwhile, more damning allegations are spilling out against Epps.

His adopted daughter, Tiffany Jones, came out of the woodwork last month to talk about how she was abused by Epps as a child. Headline USA has confirmed Jones’s identity, though the veracity of her allegations remain unclear.

Headline USA is also one of the few outlets to report on the fact that Epps likely has an outstanding warrant for his arrest in Pennsylvania. The warrant for Epps’s arrest was discovered by this reporter last year, and is detailed in a Sept. 1, 2022, article in The Libertarian Institute.

According to Pennsylvania police and court records, Epps was arrested in Pennsylvania in 2015 for criminal trespassing. Epps apparently didn’t show up to his court date, leading a warrant to be issued for his arrest on Jan. 26, 2016.

Epps’s new attorney, former Perkins Coie lawyer Michael Teter, has not responded to questions about this arrest warrant.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Fla. GOP Chair Reacts to NAACP’s Travel Warning

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) In the wake of the NAACP’s recently-issued Florida travel warning for black Americans, the Florida GOP Chair, Christian Ziegler, noted that Leon Russell, the NAACP’s chairman, lives in Tampa, Florida.

Ziegler noted that the Florida GOP would be happy to help Russell relocate out of the state that he so deeply detests.

Christina Pushaw, Gov. Ron DeSantis’s communications chief, found the irony particularly amusing:

The NAACP’s formal travel advisory warns that “under the leadership of Governor DeSantis, the state of Florida has become hostile to Black Americans and in direct conflict with the democratic ideals that our union was founded upon.”

According to NAACP President & CEO Derrick Johnson, DeSantis “should know that democracy will prevail because its defenders are prepared to stand up and fight.”

Johnson promised not to “back down,” noting that he will ask his “allies” to “join us in the battle for the soul of our nation.”

For Johnson and the NAACP, the state under DeSantis has become “openly hostile toward African Americans, people of color and LGBTQ+ individuals.”

The official travel notice warns that the state, which the NAACP boss calls home, is unfriendly to “marginalized” groups.

“Before traveling to Florida, please understand that the state of Florida devalues and marginalizes the contributions of, and the challenges faced by African Americans and other communities of color,” it says.

The NAACP is just the latest of several woke organizations to issue warnings about the state of Florida to special status groups.

Equality Florida, for example, recently warned LGBT people that in Florida there are “risks posed to the health, safety, and freedom of those considering short or long-term travel, or relocation to the state.”

They also noted that the “Don’t Say Gay” law is of particular concern.

“That law, along with additional proposals being considered, has turned the state’s classrooms into political battlefields and is telegraphing to LGBTQ families and students that they are not welcome in Florida,” the group wrote at the time.

N.Y. Christian College Fires 2 Dorm Directors for Using Pronouns in Emails

(Headline USA) As the woke U.S. State Deparment tries to ride out a misgendering fiasco following a new policy that automatically added pronouns to employees’ emails (in some cases, the wrong ones), a small, private, Christian school in New York is fighting for its right to ban the divisive, virtue-signaling practice altogether.

Now, two staff members who refused to comply are facing the consequences, while denying that they maintained any political motives in their act of civil disobedience.

Shua Wilmot and Raegan Zelaya, two former dorm directors at Houghton University, in western New York, acknowledge their names are unconventional, which explains why they attached gender identities to their work email signatures.

Wilmot uses “he/him.” Zelaya goes by “she/her.” Both correspond to the indivuduals’ respective biological genders.

However, their former employer wanted them to drop the identifiers in line with a new policy for email formats implemented in September. Both refused and were fired.

“My name is Shua. It’s an unusual name. And it ends with a vowel, ‘a,’ that is traditionally feminine in many languages,” Wilmot said in a nearly one-hour video he and Zelaya posted on YouTube shortly after they were let go last month. “If you get an email from me and you don’t know who I am, you might not know how to gender me.”

Ongoing culture wars in the U.S. over sexual preferences, gender IDs and transgender rights have engulfed politics, school campuses and many other facets of public and private life. At least 17 Republican-led states have banned or restricted life-altering transgender surgeries and treatments, particularly in young children and teens.

Debates continue to rage in some communities about school curricula mentioning sexual orientation or gender identity. And pickets have sprung up outside public libraries hosting “drag story hours.”

Meanwhile, controversies swirl at campuses with religious affiliations. The recent firings prompted more than 700 Houghton alumni to sign a petition in protest.

In the Northwest, 16 plaintiffs are suing Seattle Pacific University, a Christian liberal arts college, to challenge the school’s employment policy barring people in same-sex relationships from full-time jobs.

In New York City, LGBT students are challenging Yeshiva University’s decision to bar their student-run club from campus.

Paul Southwick, director of the Religious Exemption Accountability Project, a 2-year-old advocacy group for LGBT students at publicly funded religious colleges and universities, said actions such as these are cause for despair.

“There’s a backlash against the rise of LGBTQ rights,” he said, and not just with “white evangelical Christianity in the South … but in places like New York and Oregon that we wouldn’t think would be experiencing this backlash.”

Pro-Christian and otherwise conservative critics maintain that tolerating sexually deviant lifestyles and having those proclivities foisted upon the entire population at large are quite different matters, actively interfering with the rights of others by forcing and coercing them to endorse behaviors to which they object on moral grounds.

Pronouns have become one of many lines in the sand, with leftists trying to use the semantic warfare as a means to blur gender-identity lines even for those who do not present as a particular gender.

Earlier this year, a federal judge in Oregon dismissed a lawsuit that LGBT students filed against the U.S. Department of Education claiming it didn’t protect them against discrimination at religiously affiliated universities receiving federal money.

Houghton University, an 800-student campus 60 miles southeast of Buffalo, says it offers a “Christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences.”

In a statement emailed to the Associated Press on Saturday, the university said it could not speak publicly about personnel matters, but it “has never terminated an employment relationship based solely on the use of pronouns in staff email signatures.”

The university said it had previously asked employees to remove “anything extraneous,” including Bible quotes, from email signatures.

The university also shared with the AP an email outlining its new policy sent to staff.

The memo cautioned employees against using politically divisive and inflammatory speech in communications bearing the Houghton name. It also directed them to use standardized signature styles and forbade the use of pronouns.

Also attached to the statement was a copy of a letter university President Wayne D. Lewis Jr. sent to students.

“I would never ask you to agree with or support every decision I make,” Lewis wrote. “But I do humbly ask that you resist the temptation to reduce Houghton’s decision making to the simple and convenient political narratives of our time.”

Zelaya said she received an email in the fall from administrators saying the school was mandating changes in colors, fonts and other aspects of email to help the school maintain branding consistency.

She complied, she said, but retained her pronouns on her signature, calling it a “standard industry practice” to do so.

In the dismissal letters hand-delivered to Wilmot and Raegan Zelaya, copies of which they shared on social media, the university wrote that the firings were “a result of your refusal to remove pronouns in your email signatures in violation of institutional policy.”

In a video posted on Facebook, Zelaya said she already has another job lined up. In their joint YouTube video, she and Wilmot urged their supporters to push for change in policies, but constructively and with civility.

“As a result of this whole controversy, as a result of having my pronouns in my email signature,” Wilmot said, “it’s given me the opportunity to educate people on this topic.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Defense Dept. Schools Unveil Gender-Neutral Dress Code

(Molly Bruns, Headline USA) Grade schools run by the Department of Defense for the families of military personnel have introduced a gender-neutral dress code for students for the 2023-2024 school year.

Bureaucrats with the Department of Defense Education Activity replaced gender-specific terms and language with a “positive, equitable approach to handling dress code infractions.”

According to the Daily Caller, administrators plan to make full use of “teachable moments” to address any infractions that may arise.

The new regulations standardized the dress code throughout all DoDEA schools, removing variances on clothing items like spaghetti straps, halter tops, baggy pants and skin-tight clothing.

The new policy did not include any guidance on the length of skirts or shorts, such as the “fingertip rule.”

Students must don solid clothing that provides full coverage from armpit to mid-thigh. Shirts must have sleeves and cannot be “transparent or translucent.” Articles of clothing featuring profanities; patterns deemed as discriminatory against race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, disability or religion; encouragement for drinking and drug use; and violence-promoting slogans are also banned.

“The goal, from the outset, was to create a dress code that is equitable, nonbiased and supports the learning environment while allowing individual expression,” DoDEA spokesperson Will Griffin said.

Griffin explained that the universal dress code would allow the more transient student population to adapt to other military schools.

The DoDEA started revising the policy in 2021. The federally-funded school system hired an outside committee for civil rights and several diversity, equity and inclusion specialists to assist with the project.

The administrators also took public comments from students and parents into account. Students requested the administration permit both hats and ripped jeans, to which the school acquiesced.

“They wanted to be able to express themselves, to have their own individuality and to feel like they were part of the decision of what they could wear to school,” said DoDEA education specialist Joy Medley.

There are 160 DoDEA schools across the globe. The new dress code goes into effect at all of the institutions on July 1, 2023.

The DoDEA’s fixation on DEI initiatives has met with some backlash from conservatives. In April, after word circulated about its racist diversity chief, Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, led the successful effort to disband the DEI unit.

Meta Fined a Record $1.3B by EU, Ordered to Stop Sending European User Data Abroad

(Headline USA) The European Union slapped Meta with a record $1.3 billion privacy fine Monday and ordered it to stop transferring user data across the Atlantic by October, the latest salvo in a decadelong case sparked by U.S. cybersnooping fears.

The penalty of 1.2 billion euros is the biggest since the EU’s strict data privacy regime took effect five years ago, surpassing Amazon’s 746 million euro fine in 2021 for data protection violations.

Meta, which had previously warned that services for its users in Europe could be cut off, vowed to appeal and ask courts to immediately put the decision on hold.

“There is no immediate disruption to Facebook in Europe,” the company said.

“This decision is flawed, unjustified and sets a dangerous precedent for the countless other companies transferring data between the EU and U.S.,” Nick Clegg, Meta’s president of global and affairs, and Chief Legal Officer Jennifer Newstead said in a statement.

It’s yet another twist in a legal battle that began in 2013 when Austrian lawyer and privacy activist Max Schrems filed a complaint about Facebook’s handling of his data following former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden’s revelations of electronic surveillance by U.S. security agencies. That included the disclosure that Facebook gave the agencies access to the personal data of Europeans.

The saga has highlighted the clash between Washington and Brussels over the differences between Europe’s strict view on data privacy and the comparatively lax regime in the U.S., which lacks a federal privacy law.

The EU has been a global leader in reining in the power of Big Tech with a series of regulations forcing them police their platforms more strictly and protect users’ personal information.

An agreement covering EU–U.S. data transfers known as the Privacy Shield was struck down in 2020 by the EU’s top court, which said it didn’t do enough to protect residents from the U.S. government’s electronic prying. Monday’s decision confirmed that another tool to govern data transfers—stock legal contracts—was also invalid.

Brussels and Washington signed a deal last year on a reworked Privacy Shield that Meta could use, but the pact is awaiting a decision from European officials on whether it adequately protects data privacy.

EU institutions have been reviewing the agreement, and the bloc’s lawmakers this month called for improvements, saying the safeguards aren’t strong enough.

The Ireland’s Data Protection Commission handed down the fine as Meta’s lead privacy regulator in the 27-nation bloc because the Silicon Valley tech giant’s European headquarters is based in Dublin.

The Irish watchdog said it gave Meta five months to stop sending European user data to the U.S. and six months to bring its data operations into compliance “by ceasing the unlawful processing, including storage, in the U.S.” of European users’ personal data transferred in violation of the bloc’s privacy rules.

If the new transatlantic privacy agreement takes effect before these deadlines, “our services can continue as they do today without any disruption or impact on users,” Meta said.

Schrems predicted that Meta has “no real chance” of getting the decision materially overturned. And a new privacy pact might not mean the end of Meta’s troubles, because there’s a good chance it could be tossed out by the EU’s top court, he said.

“Meta plans to rely on the new deal for transfers going forward, but this is likely not a permanent fix,” Schrems said in a statement. “Unless U.S. surveillance laws gets fixed, Meta will likely have to keep EU data in the EU.”

Meta warned in its latest earnings report that without a legal basis for data transfers, it will be forced to stop offering its products and services in Europe, “which would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.”

The social media company might have to carry out a costly and complex revamp of its operations if it’s forced to stop shipping user data across the Atlantic. Meta has a fleet of 21 data centers, according to its website, but 17 of them are in the United States. Three others are in the European nations of Denmark, Ireland and Sweden. Another is in Singapore.

Other social media giants are facing pressure over their data practices. TikTok has tried to soothe Western fears about the Chinese-owned short video sharing app’s potential cybersecurity risks with a $1.5 billion project to store U.S. user data on Oracle servers.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Whistleblower, Radar Data Appear to Implicate U.S. in Eco-Terrorism Attack

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) A self-proclaimed whistleblower has gone public with new information further implicating the Biden administration in one of the most destructive acts of eco-terrorism in world history: the September 2022 bombing of Russia’s Nord Stream pipelines.

The Biden administration continues to deny responsibility for the attack—implausibly claiming that Russia would explode its own infrastructure—while Pulitzer prize-winning reporter Seymour Hersh wrote in February about how the Biden White House coordinated with the Pentagon and CIA throughout late 2021 and 2022 to sabotage the pipelines.

On Sunday, prominent Twitter personality and political activist Kim Dotcom published a monologue about the attack that he said comes from a whistleblower.

The apparent whistleblower said he used to work with contractors at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab in Maryland, where they developed the Advanced Seal Delivery System (ASDS)—a covert mini-submarine designed for the Navy Seals to carry out stealthy clandestine missions.

“Even in 2001, we had the ability to program a variety of scenarios, including the sabotaging of pipelines,” the apparent whistleblower said.

“Although I did not pilot a simulated mission specifically for the Nord Stream pipelines, I did simulate scenarios of covertly sabotaging pipelines,” the whistleblower continued. “I can confirm that the United States has had this capability for decades, and the ASDS is in the U.S. inventory, fully capable of executing the Nord Stream Sabotage.”

The reported whistleblower shared open-source radar data that appears to implicate the U.S. military in the attack.

According to the data from flightradar24.com, a U.S. Navy Sikorsky MH-60R Seahawk helicopter hovered over the site of the explosion before it happened. The Seahawk helicopter was designed to deploy sonobuoys, which are sonar systems dropped from aircraft that conduct anti-submarine warfare or underwater acoustic research.

The significance of a sonobuoy-deploying aircraft being near the crime scene is that it corroborates Hersh’s reporting, which alleged that Navy Seal divers attached C4 explosives to the pipelines and used advanced sonobuoy technology to detonate them.

“This helicopter was present at the scene of the explosion before, during, and after the event, equipped with sonobuoy capable of triggering the explosion,” the apparent whistleblower said.

The radar data also showed that a reconnaissance aircraft with no call sign circled the site of the explosion after the attack.

The whistleblower noted that the aircraft, a Boeing P-8A Poseidon, was flying as low as about 7,200 feet, which would give it a view of the explosion site.

“During this time, it had an observational view of the aftermath of the second wave of explosions,” he said.

Kim Dotcom’s Twitter thread also included a link to a YouTube video that was published about two weeks ago, containing similar information.

The YouTube channel where the video appears is tied to a suspended Twitter account, @leec85, but there is no other information about who is operating the channel.

Kim Dotcom added his own commentary along with the whistleblower’s information.

“I was contacted by this whistleblower and was asked to publish this thread,” he said.

“I reviewed the radar evidence, and it creates a compelling case of the U.S. Gov’t blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines,” he added. “There is no question in my mind that Joe Biden ordered this act of terrorism.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.