States See Chinese Purchase of Farmland as Threat to Nat’l Security

Editor 1
-
0
States See Chinese Purchase of Farmland as Threat to Nat’l Security

(Kim Jarrett, The Center Square) Several states have already banned or are considering banning foreign ownership of farmland from U.S. adversaries such as China, a trend that has its recent roots in North Dakota.

Chinese food manufacturer Fufeng Group purchased 370 acres of land for a corn milling plant in Grand Forks in November 2021.

By January 2023, the Grand Forks City Council announced it would deny building permits for the plant, killing the project 12 miles from the Grand Forks Air Force Base.

The pressure came from state and federal officials concerned about the proposed plant’s ties to China and its proximity to the base. A report from the Air Force that officially called the purchase of the land a “threat to national security” sealed the transaction’s fate.

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, about 40.8 million acres of U.S. farmland is owned by foreign citizens, companies or countries as of 2021. China owned about 384,000 acres of U.S. farmland.

While the Grand Forks plan is dead, states’ efforts to prevent China and other communist countries from owning land are ongoing.

North Dakota lawmakers this session passed a bill that prevents city or county governments from entering into land deals with foreign adversaries. Other legislators have also introduced or passed bills dealing with foreign ownership of agricultural land.

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem was one of the first governors to ban the Chinese-owned app TikTok from state-owned devices, but her push to ban the country and others from purchasing land was not as successful.

The state banned aliens from owning more than 160 acres of land in 1979. Lawmakers wanted to establish the “Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States – South Dakota,” which would scrutinize all foreign farmland purchases.

Senate Bill 185 failed to make it out of the Senate.

Republicans in Arizona also failed to pass a bill banning foreign entities from owning land in their state. It passed the Senate but did not garner enough votes in the House.

Other states are having more success with passing similar legislation.

Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte signed Senate Bill 203 this session that bans land purchases by what it refers to as “foreign adversaries,” defined as “any foreign government or foreign non government person determined by the U.S. secretary of commerce to have engaged in a long-term pattern or serious instances of conduct significantly adverse to the national security of the United States …”

The governor’s office identified China, North Korea, Russia, Iran, Cuba and Venezuela in a news release about signing the legislation.

In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis signed legislation in May that prohibits the sale of farmland and land near military bases to the Chinese Communist Party and its agents. The measure also prevents any governmental entity from knowingly entering into contracts with the CCP, or countries and entities of concern. The attorney general will able to bring a civil action against any entity in violation and the civil penalty for doing so will be twice the amount that the entity submitted a bid or proposal.

North Carolina representatives passed a bill that prevents adversarial foreign governments from acquiring farmland or property near military installations. The legislation is in the Senate.

Texas senators passed a bill that would ban foreign nationals from countries posing security threats, including China, from purchasing farmland but the measure didn’t get through the House. Gov. Greg Abbott supports the ban and he could add it to the list of items during a summer legislative session he is expected to call.

The possibility of foreign entities owning farmlands is not just a Republican issue. State Sen. Melissa Hurtado, D-Sanger, introduced a bill in heavily-Democratic California that would track foreign ownership of farmland and ban foreign purchases in 2024. The bill was placed in the Legislature’s suspense file, killing it for this session.

Federal level

More than 45 members of Congress signed on to the “Prohibition of Agricultural Land for the People’s Republic of China Act.” The bill was introduced by U.S. Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-Wash., in 2022 but did not make it out of committee. The current bill is in two committees – Foreign Affairs and Agriculture.

The Senate is considering a bipartisan bill banning several countries from purchasing American farmland. The “Promoting Agriculture Safeguards and Security Act” would add the secretary of agriculture to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. The lead sponsors are Sens. John Tester, D-Mont., and Mike Rounds, R-S.D. The bill is assigned to the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee.

Cole Lauterbach, David Mastio, Dan McCaleb and Alan Wooten contributed to this report. 

McCarthy, Biden Reach Tentative Debt-Ceiling Deal, but Many Remain Skeptical

Editor 1
-
0
McCarthy, Biden Reach Tentative Debt-Ceiling Deal, but Many Remain Skeptical

(Headline USA) House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and President Joe Biden reached an “agreement in principle” to raise the nation’s legal debt ceiling, but now Congress must rush to approve the spending cuts package in a matter of days to avert a potentially disastrous U.S. default.

The agreement risks angering both Democratic and Republican sides as lawmakers Sunday begin to unpack the the concessions made to compromise.

Negotiators agreed to some Republican demands for increased work requirements for recipients of food stamps that had sparked an uproar from House Democrats as a nonstarter. But they stopped short of greater spending cuts overall that Republicans wanted.

Support from both parties will be needed to win congressional approval before a projected June 5 government default on U.S. debts.

McCarthy in brief remarks at the Capitol said that “we still have a lot of work to do.”

But the Republican speaker said: “I believe this is an agreement in principle that’s worthy of the American people.”

The Republican speaker and Democrat president reached the agreement after the two spoke Saturday evening by phone.

“The agreement represents a compromise, which means not everyone gets what they want,” Biden said in a statement late Saturday night. “That’s the responsibility of governing,” he said.

Biden called the agreement “good news for the American people, because it prevents what could have been a catastrophic default and would have led to an economic recession, retirement accounts devastated, and millions of jobs lost.”

However, some fact checkers have noted that this situation may not be as dire as Democrats have sought to portray it in the media in their bid to hijack the negotiation process.

Were the country to surpass the debt ceiling and be forced to cease any extra spending, it would first be obligated to pay its debtors before any discretionary spending. It is also likely that the two sides would find a quick fix to keep essential services, such as social security, in place, as has been the case in previous government shutdowns.

Moreover, the situation is not unprecedented, with the U.S. having defaulted at least three times previously, the last one being in 1979, according to an Axios fact check.

With the outlines of a deal in place, the legislative package could be drafted and shared with lawmakers in time for House votes as soon as Wednesday, and later next week in the Senate.

Central to the package is a two-year budget deal that would hold spending flat for 2024 and increase it by 1% for 2025 in exchange for raising the debt limit for two years, pushing the volatile political issue past the next presidential election.

Driving hard for a deal to impose tougher work requirements on government aid recipients, Republicans achieved some but not all of what they wanted. The agreement would raise the age for existing work requirements on able-bodied adults without children from 49 to 54, but Biden was able to secure waivers for veterans and the homeless.

The two sides had also reached for an ambitious overhaul of federal permitting to ease development of energy projects. Instead, the agreement would put in place changes in the landmark 1970s’ National Environmental Policy Act that will designate “a single lead agency” to develop environmental reviews, in hopes of streamlining the process.

The deal came together after Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told Congress that the United States could default on its debt obligations by June 5—four days later than previously estimated—if lawmakers did not act in time.

Lifting he nation’s debt limit, now at $31 trillion, allows more borrowing to pay the nation’s already incurred bills although the Biden administration has expressed little interest in doing so.

After COVID spending sent the deficit skyrocketing, Biden, with a Democrat-led Congress, proceeded to pass even more multi-trillion-dollar packages that directed funds to historical leftist donors, such as labor unions and green-energy developers.

He also has sent an estimated $150 billion, at least, to fund a war in Ukraine that many believe is being rerouted into his offshore retirement fund by way of the energy company Burisma and other investments in bioweapons development through family members including his son Hunter.

Biden spoke earlier in the day with Democrat leaders in Congress to discuss the status of the talks. White House officials planned to brief House Democrats on a Sunday video call.

Many of the fiscally conservative Republicans in Congress have long been skeptical of the Treasury’s projections, and they are pressing McCarthy to hold out.

Both sides have suggested one of the main holdups was a GOP effort to expand work requirements for recipients of food stamps and other federal aid programs, a longtime Republican goal that Democrats have strenuously opposed.

Biden has said the work requirements for Medicaid would be a nonstarter. He had seemed potentially open to negotiating changes on food stamps, now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, despite objections from rank-and-file Democrats.

Lawmakers are not expected to return to work from the Memorial Day weekend before Tuesday, at the earliest, and McCarthy has promised lawmakers he will abide by the rule to post any bill for 72 hours before voting.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

‘Sham’: Inside the GOP Reaction to Paxton’s Unprecedented Impeachment

Associate Editor
-
0
‘Sham’: Inside the GOP Reaction to Paxton’s Unprecedented Impeachment

(Bethany Blankley, The Center Square) – The Republican Party of Texas argued any attempts by House Speaker Dade Phelan, R-Beaumont, to schedule a vote to impeach Attorney General Ken Paxton, or the House voting to impeach him, is “a sham.”

A Houston-area lawmaker called the House impeaching Paxton illegal

On Thursday, six members of a House committee voted to recommend the House impeach Paxton on 20 articles of impeachment. The House scheduled the resolution to impeach and successfully passed articles of impeachment against a sitting attorney general on Saturday (for the first time ever).

Republican Party of Texas Chairman Matt Rinaldi issued a statement Friday saying, “This sham impeachment is the result of the Phelan leadership team empowering Democrats, allowing them to hold leadership positions and letting them control the agenda. It is based on allegations already litigated by voters, led by a liberal Speaker trying to undermine his conservative adversaries, and investigated by lawyers connected to a Democrat on the House General Investigations Committee. 

“The voters have supported General Paxton through three elections – and his popularity has only grown despite millions of dollars spent to try and defeat him. Now the Texas House is trying to overturn the election results.” 

Rep. Steve Toth, R-Woodlands, argued it’s illegal for the House to impeach Paxton according to Government Code Chapter 665 Impeachment and Removal Sec. 665.081. It states: “NO REMOVAL FOR ACTS COMMITTED BEFORE ELECTION TO OFFICE. (a) An officer in this state may not be removed from office for an act the officer may have committed before the officer’s election to office.” 

In a Facebook live post, he read the statute and said, “It’s really clear. You can’t remove a statewide office holder under an alleged accusation that occurred before the person was elected. That’s exactly what they’re doing right now.” 

The problem with impeachment, Toth said, “is that as the House votes to do this, and they’ll do it. You’ll get all 64 Democrats and a few Republicans and Ken Paxton will be impeached.” 

What will happen next, he said, is “this will end up going to the courts and a temporary restraining order will be issued.”

Josh Blackman, a constitutional law professor at the South Texas College of Law Houston, argued, “Many of the allegations against Paxton occurred before Paxton was elected to a third term in office in November 2022. And Paxton’s lawyer has cited Section 665.081 as a possible defense. He contends that the voters re-elected Paxton, with full knowledge of the allegations against him.” 

Blackman, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute and the president of the Harlan Institute, explained in an article published by Reason that, “Section 665.081 can be read in two different ways. First, an officer cannot be removed for an act he committed before being elected to his current term in office. Second, an officer cannot be removed for an act he committed before being elected to his first term of his current position. Under the first reading, Paxton could not be removed for conduct that occurred before November 2022. Under the second reading, Paxton could not be removed for conduct that occurred before November 2014, when he was elected to his first term.” 

The Texas House had never impeached an attorney general. It impeached a sitting governor in 1917, Gov. James Ferguson, and a state judge in 1975, Judge O.P. Carrillo.

The case now goes to the state Senate for trial.

BREAKING: Ken Paxton’s Heartfelt Rebuttal to ‘Illegal’ Impeachment

Luis Cornelio
-
0
BREAKING: Ken Paxton’s Heartfelt Rebuttal to ‘Illegal’ Impeachment

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, has reacted to the impeachment proceedings successfully brought against him. In a heartfelt response, Paxton displayed a defiant tone, dismissing the charges as politically motivated and “illegal.” 

In a long statement shared via Twitter, Paxton said, “The ugly spectacle in the Texas House today confirmed the outrageous impeachment plot against me was never meant to be fair or just. It was a politically motivated sham from the beginning.” 

Paxton has repeatedly rejected any notion of any wrongdoing and said in an interview his office had evidence to refute claims led by those who he dubbed “liberal Republicans.” “My office made every effort to present evidence, testimony, and irrefutable facts that would have disproven the countless false statements and outright lies advanced by Speaker Dade Phelan and the Murr-Johnson panel he appointed.” 

In a Friday interview with U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., Paxton said Phelan was plotting a witch hunt because of the corruption schemes Paxton had previously uncovered. Gaetz, who was guest hosting the Greg Kelly Reports show on Newsmax, asked Paxton whether he was confident the Texas Senate would clear him from a trial. Paxton said he had confidence in the Senate but called out the Texas House for withholding crucial information from his office. 

Former President Donald Trump weighed in on the impeachment, slamming Phelan as a “RINO” (Republican in Name Only) and questioning his commitment to the Republican Party. Trump, as reported by Headline USA on Saturday, also torched Phelan for hindering election integrity efforts in Texas. 

Paxton accused the speaker of the Texas House of aligning with the Biden administration and radical democrats. “Phelan’s coalition of Democrats and liberal Republicans is now in lockstep with the Biden administration, the abortion industry, anti-gun zealots, and woke corporations to sabotage my work as Attorney General, including our ongoing litigation to stop illegal immigration, uphold the rule of law, and protect the constitutional rights of every Texan.” 

The impeachment proceedings were introduced over a dispute on whether the state legislature should cover the cost of a legal settlement by the Attorney General’s Office.

During the hearings, Paxton called several House Republicans and warned them of the political consequences if they voted to impeach him. 

In concluding remarks, the now-impeached attorney general thanked Texan voters for supporting him. “I am beyond grateful to have the support of millions of Texans who recognize that what we just witnessed is illegal, unethical, and profoundly unjust,” Paxton concluded. “I look forward to a quick resolution in the Texas Senate, where I have full confidence the process will be fair and just.” 

‘Kids Alone’: Disturbing Details in NYC Migrant Hotel Exposed

Luis Cornelio
-
0
‘Kids Alone’: Disturbing Details in NYC Migrant Hotel Exposed

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) A former hotel employee has come forward with startling revelations about the conditions at a migrant hotel in New York City.

Carlos Arellano, a former worker at the Row NYC Hotel, appeared on Fox News’s Fox & Friends Weekends to speak about what he described as a “free for all” environment within the facility, including the discovery of a ten-year-old girl drunk.

“Every day, we find about ten kids alone in their hotel rooms, either drinking or doing drugs. Weapons will be in the room. But we’re not allowed to go in there. We’re not allowed to take anything from them. It’s basically a free-for-all,” Arellano said.

According to Arellano, who no longer works at the NYC hotel, overcrowding, inadequate supervision and trashed rooms were rampant at the migrant-filled facility. Fox News reported that the trashed hotel is no longer open to tourists, as it exclusively serves as a shelter for illegal aliens.

“Just a lot of people who are very there, they don’t appreciate what they have. And they come here with the mindset of the way they live back at their home country, and they think there’s no rules or no laws to be followed here,” Arellano added.

The former employee also said that hotel staff at times have difficulties identifying the parents of minors because of “fake passports” and “fake Social Security cards.”

Several current employees thanked Arellano for speaking up about the dire condition they face.

“A lot of former coworkers have reached out and are happy that I did the interview. And they’re saying this place deserves to be shut down, that they fear for their life every day, as well as I do,” he said of an interview with Turning Point USA’s Frontlines, where he first exposed the hotel.

Arellano’s comments come days after the Biden administration came under fire for lying about taxpayer-funded perks, including housing, to illegal aliens. Biden’s Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which oversees the regulation and implementation of immigration laws, took to Twitter claiming that allegations “that migrants will be provided free travel and transportation to their destination are false.”

CBP’s tweet was filled with lies, as FEMA admitted that they work with non-profits to accommodate illegal aliens with temporary housing and transportation.

‘Piece of S–t’: Constituents Scold AOC in Chaotic Town Hall

Luis Cornelio
-
0
‘Piece of S–t’: Constituents Scold AOC in Chaotic Town Hall

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Tensions flared at a chaotic town hall meeting hosted by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., when fired-up constituents confronted the congressman on her pro-illegal immigration and support of the funding for Ukraine.

As AOC discussed the debt ceiling negotiations and Republican-led tax cuts, a protestor approached the stage and shouted, “American citizens before migrants.”  

Security at the town hall quickly got a hold of the man and prevented him from nearing the congresswoman.

The heckler continued to shout even as security attempted to diffuse the situation. “Where are you on the migrant issue? You’re a piece of s—t!” the man said, to which the self-proclaimed democratic-socialist congresswoman responded, “OK.”

AOC took to Twitter to thank those who attempted the town hall, claiming she had “such a great crowd.” She also added, “It was awesome answering all your questions, discussing the debt limit negotiations, and more. See you next month!”

But the town hall was far from perfect. Several protesters called out the embattled congresswoman’s support for taxpayer funding for the Russo-Ukrainian war.

“Stop funding this war, there’s a lot of communities that need help and need that money,” one woman yelled before being escorted out from the meeting.

The woman’s comments were echoed by a fellow protestor who torched AOC’s for voting for a $113 billion aid package for Ukraine in January 2023. “100 billion for Ukraine that you voted for,” the man shouted.

Footage of the town hall showed AOC responding to the protestors saying, “I don’t like that Republicans passed a $1.7 trillion tax cut on the wealthiest people on this country.”

The New York Post reported that AOC’s town halls are “increasingly drawing hostile crowds,” with a group of protesters crashing one of her meetings chanting “AOC has got to go!” in 2022.

Trump Torches ‘RINO’-led Impeachment of AG Ken Paxton

Luis Cornelio
-
0
Trump Torches ‘RINO’-led Impeachment of AG Ken Paxton

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Former President Donald Trump criticized the efforts of the Texas Speaker of the House, Dade Phelan, who is leading the impeachment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. The impeachment proceedings are centered around a dispute over whether the state legislature should cover the costs of a legal settlement from Paxton’s office. 

Trump, a staunch supporter of Paxton, took to Truth Social on Saturday to lash out at Phelan, accusing him of being a “RINO” (Republican in Name Only) and questioning his commitment to the Republican Party. Trump also torched Phelan for thwarting election integrity efforts.

Touting Paxton’s conservative accomplishments, Trump described him as “one of the most hard working and effective Attorney Generals in the United States.” Trump, the leading candidate for the GOP primary for president, accused liberal Republicans of usurping the will of Texas voters. 

Paxton secured a third term as AG this past November, defeating embattled Democrat Rochelle Garza by approximately ten points. Previously, Paxton defeated Jeb Bush’s son, George P. Bush, in an embarrassing GOP primary for the Bush dynasty. 

“You would think that any issue would have been fully adjudicated by the voters of Texas, especially when that vote was so conclusive….” Trump continued in the fired-up post. 

Paxton spoke for the first time about the impeachment in an interview with Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., who hosted Newsmax’s Greg Kelly Reports on Friday. Paxton said this impeachment was a political hit job because he had “exposed” liberal Republicans for cutting deals with “liberal Democrats.”

The Texas AG also shared Trump’s reaction to the infamous impeachment on Twitter, where he was met with praise from key conservative leaders. In response to Paxton’s tweet, host of the Unafraid show Mike Crispi said, “Ken Paxton is AMERICA’S Attorney General.” 

Crispi’s response was echoed by radio and TV host Grant Stinchfield who called the impeachment a “Kangaroo Court in Texas” in a Saturday tweet. Stinchfield accused “Soros Democrats” of conspiring with “RINOs” to attack Paxton. 

Becker News CEO Kyle Becker reported a “bombshell” development in the Trump-style impeachment, involving calls from Paxton to GOP members of the state legislature threatening political consequences if they voted against him in the impeachment proceedings. 

Texas Rep. Charlie Geren, a member of the investigative committee, introduced the impeachment on Saturday, saying, “We’re here today because the Attorney General asked the legislature to fund a multi-million dollar settlement against him.” 

According to KXAN journalist Ryan Chandler, anti-Paxton Rep. David Spiller admitted that House Republicans did not have to find evidence of any wrongdoing to impeach Paxton. “You don’t have to have proof of anything beyond a reasonable doubt or by preponderance of the evidence,” Spiller said.

Planned Parenthood to Lay Off 10 to 20% of National Workforce

Dmytro "Henry" Aleksandrov
-
0
Planned Parenthood to Lay Off 10 to 20% of National Workforce

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Planned Parenthood is expected to lay off 10 to 20% of its employees all around the United States, which means that at least 80 people will stop participating in the murdering of unborn babies.

According to the report found by Breitbart, PP officials said that the layoffs are part of an effort to restructure the organization’s national office and to shift focus on assisting local affiliates.

“In a joint statement from unions representing employees in New York, San Francisco and Washington, D.C., union officials expressed dismay at the news, saying that Planned Parenthood leaders are ‘pushing out some of our movement’s brightest minds,'” the report stated.

“‘This comes at a time where reproductive freedom is in jeopardy and when our members are struggling under difficult economic conditions.'”

The reason why the baby-murdering organization decided to fire so many people is that the abortion rate dramatically dropped after the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade and returned the issue of abortion to individual states. Because of the massive pro-life law that was passed in June 2022, more than a dozen of states passed pro-life laws that protect unborn babies.

PP Federation of America and PP Action Fund said in a statement that the organization will “reimagine” its national office and will invest $70 million in its affiliates, Breitbart reported.

PP President and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson said that the organization will also work to expand the abortion propaganda through telehealth services and other technologies that are “aimed at serving patients regardless of location.” PP also plans to invest even more in national elections and race-related initiatives.

“Without question, the world we are living in right now — the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and the loss of abortion access, the weaponization of our courts and attacks on our democracy, the criminalization of providers and patients, and rampant misinformation — is vastly different than just a decade ago,” McGill said.

“Planned Parenthood must change too.”

Court Forces Cheating Dems to Add Candidate to Primary Ballot

Editor 5
-
0
Court Forces Cheating Dems to Add Candidate to Primary Ballot

(Headline USA) Mississippi could have a Democratic primary for governor in August because a judge ruled Friday that the party improperly excluded a candidate from the ballot.

The state Democratic Party immediately filed notice that it will ask the Mississippi Supreme Court to overturn the judge’s ruling on the candidacy of Bob Hickingbottom.

The state Democratic Executive Committee decided in February that Hickingbottom could not be on the ballot as a Democrat.

The executive committee also excluded Gregory Wash from running for governor this year, after he ran a low-budget campaign for governor in the Democratic primary four years ago.

The party’s decisions left Brandon Presley, a four-term public service commissioner, as the only Democratic candidate for governor. Wash did not challenge the party’s decision, but Hickingbottom filed a lawsuit.

Mississippi primaries are Aug. 8, and the general election is Nov. 7.

Presley campaign spokesman Michael Beyer on Friday responded to questions about a potential Democratic primary by focusing on a welfare misspending case that developed while Reeves was lieutenant governor.

“We welcome any legally qualified candidate to enter the race, and our campaign will continue to focus on Tate Reeves’ failed record of allowing criminals to misspend $77 million of Mississippians’ hard-earned taxpayer dollars meant for working families on luxury cars, steak dinners, and even a volleyball stadium,” Beyer said.

Judge Forrest A. Johnson Jr. wrote that the Democratic Party was not allowed to reject Hickingbottom’s candidacy on grounds that Hickinbottom has failed to file an economic interest statement with the Ethics Commission.

Johnson wrote that Hickingbottom meets the qualifications to run for governor, which are in the state constitution: A candidate must be at least 30 years old, a U.S. citizen at least 20 years and a resident of Mississippi at least five years before the election.

Hickingbottom is Black, and Presley is white. Presley’s campaign did not mention race Friday, but Mississippi Republican Party chairman Frank Bordeaux did.

“Brandon Presley and his Democratic Party allies corruptly pushed his African American opponent off the ballot,” Bordeaux said in a statement. “A judge just ruled their actions are illegal and unethical, and now Presley faces a primary challenge. Why did Brandon Presley work so hard to prevent an African American candidate from accessing the ballot?”

Hickingbottom filed a campaign finance report this month showing he raised and spent no money through April. Presley reported $1.6 million in his campaign fund.

Reeves reported $9 million in campaign money, while Witcher reported about $21,000 and Hardigree reported no money.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Target Continues Grooming Kids, Sponsors Drag ‘Queen’ Story Hour

Dmytro "Henry" Aleksandrov
-
0
Target Continues Grooming Kids, Sponsors Drag ‘Queen’ Story Hour

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Even after losing billions of dollars, Target continued pushing the “transgender” propaganda on children by sponsoring an upcoming drag “queen” story hour.

According to an exclusive report from National File, Target sponsored an upcoming drag “queen” story hour in the western New York city of Batavia, to continue the attack on American children by sexual deviants in the corporate world.

The news about the recent push of LGBT propaganda broke amid a national boycott of Target due to the retailer marketing openly satanic merchandise that promotes sexually deviant behavior and “transgender” delusions to small children as a preparation for another LGBT propaganda in a form of a “Pride” month.

Among the things that Target and the satanic designer pushed in stores all around the country are swimwear meant to tuck genitalia, products that call for the guillotining of people who stand against the child-mutilating LGBT lobby and pins that openly promote Satanism and state that Satan “respects pronouns.”

Richmond Memorial Library — the taxpayer-funded location where the grooming is going to take place — will have a drag “queen” story hour for little children on June 10, as a part of Batavia’s overall desire to indoctrinate children throughout the entire “celebration” of the month of “pride.”

Rochester-based drag “queens” Valentino Rose and Zenadia — two groomers who constantly expose little children to explicitly lewd, sexual performances — are expected to be a part of the show. National File reported that the event is run by Glow Out, an LGBT organization dedicated to continue grooming children in Western New York.

To further indoctrinate the youth into accepting the deviant LGBT ideology, the organization also holds a groomer event where they invite small children to their center.

Even though Target has become a criminal company for violating a New York state law that says that exposing minors to sexual performances is prohibited, the Democrats who rule the state — for obvious reasons — don’t even bother to punish Target.

1...1,9621,9631,964...3,890Page 1,963 of 3,890