Topless Transgender Slams White House’s Rebuke: ‘Free the Nipple’

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The troubling transgender activist who made headlines by disturbingly going topless during a White House pride event has responded to the backlash, delivering a scathing critique of the Biden administration’s rebuttal to the lewd act.

The White House swiftly attempted to save face and condemned the act, which occurred at the South Lawn, claiming they’ve banned the perpetrator, transgender activist Rose Montoya, from future White House events. However, the embattled transgender activist did not receive the criticism lightly.

In a now-viral Instagram post, Montoya firmly defended the decision to go topless and torched critics, claiming the act was legal in D.C., and aligned with the essence of pride and living her real self. “I fully support the movement and freeing the nipple,” Montoya claimed.

The embattled transgender activist also explained she was following the example of other individuals, alleged transgender men, who displayed their breast-removal surgery scars. “My trans masculine friends were showing off their top surgery scars and living in joy, and I wanted to join them,” Montoya added. “And because it is perfectly within the law of Washington, D.C., I decided to join them and cover my nipples just to play it safe.”

Downplaying accusations of vulgarity, Montoya dubiously clarified her intentions, claiming, “I wanted to be fully free and myself. I had zero intention of trying to be vulgar or be profane in any way. I was simply living my joy and my truth and existing in my body. Happy Pride. Free the nipple.”

When confronted over the behavior of Biden’s guests, White House mouthpiece Karine Jean-Pierre echoed the administration’s previous condemnation, calling the act “deeply unacceptable” and “unfair to the hundreds of attendees who were they to celebrate their families.”

The controversy surrounding Montoya’s topless act ignited discussions over whether children should be allowed in LGBTQ-related events, including pride, with the Twitter account Gays Against Groomers sharing videos depicting sexually activities involving children and criticizing those who claim these events are “family friendly”

WATCH: CNN Host Loses It after Trump Cheered by Cubans, Prayers in Miami Cafe

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) CNN host Jake Tapper caused a stir during his recent broadcast by berating the control room to immediately cease airing footage of former President Donald Trump’s visit to a Maimi cafe. Tapper’s outburst came shortly after Trump’s arraignment on 37 charges pertaining to the alleged mishandling of classified documents.

During the visit, Trump was highly celebrated by his supporters, including many Cuban Americans. The celebratory footage clearly irked Tapper, the leftist host, who expressed his frustration by declaring, “I don’t need to see any more of that. He’s trying to turn it into a spectacle and into a campaign ad. That is enough of that. We’ve seen it already.”

Tapper’s apparent agitation prompted criticism from conservatives, who mocked Tapper and CNN for showing contempt for Trump and his supporters. The popular Twitter account, The Columbia Bugle, even mocked Tapper for having a meltdown.

Podcast host Jack Posobiec chimed in, accusing Tapper of “throwing a hissy fit.” Journalist Eddie Scarry suggested that Tapper should have been fired by Chris Licht, the former CNN CEO who tried, but failed, to make CNN a less biased news channel.

Trump’s spontaneous visit to the café highlighted his enduring popularity among the GOP base, especially Cuban Americans who have rallied behind Trump and his conservative policies since his election in 2016.

Inside the restaurant, Trump was greeted by supporters who prayed with him. One woman told Trump, “Jesus loves you.” UFC superstar Jorge Masvidal was also present and enthusiastically cheered the president, even hugging him. Masvidal had previously expressed his support for Trump, calling him the “greatest president in the history of the world” during a viral speech in April at UFC 287 in Miami, Florida.

In downtown Miami, where Trump pleaded not guilty to the criminal charges brought by the Biden administration-led DOJ, several Trump supporters took to the streets. As Trump left the cafe, the crowd outside shouted, “We love you.”

The DOJ, through Special Counsel Jack Smith, made the unprecedented decision to indict a former U.S. president and leading presidential candidate. This move has rallied the Republican base and garnered support from several prominent conservative members of Congress.

Republicans argue that President Joe Biden, embattled Attorney General Merrick Garland and the notoriously anti-Trump FBI conspired to politically target Trump. Some Republicans even claim that Garland’s bitterness stems from Trump thwarting his Obama-era nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2016.

CNN, on the other hand, has sided with the DOJ over this indictment. Their partisan coverage of the indictment comes a month after Trump confronted CNN host Kaitlan Collins during a contentious town hall, which ultimately led to the ousting of CNN CEO, after Trump and his supporters took control of the event, 

Report: Wuhan Scientists Were the First to Catch COVID-19

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) A bombshell report Tuesday revealed that three of the first people to become infected with COVID-19 were scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where the virus is suspected by some to have originated.

Citing unnamed sources within the U.S. government, the report—published by journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag—identified Wuhan scientists Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu as the three who were first infected.

“As such, not only do we know there were WIV scientists who had developed COVID-19-like illnesses in November 2019, but also that they were working with the closest relatives of SARS-CoV-2, and inserting gain-of-function features unique to it,” the report said.

Tuesday’s report is the latest evidence that COVID-19 originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology—and not at a nearby wet market, as originally claimed by many establishment authority figures.

In February, FBI Director Chris Wray reportedly said his bureau “has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan.” And last week, Times of London reported that State Department investigators “found evidence that researchers working on these experiments were taken to hospital with Covid-like symptoms in November 2019.”

As noted by Shellenberger, Taibbi and Gutentag, various publications have uncovered suggestive details over the last year-plus, including the fact that the NIH awarded funding for at least 18 gain-of-function research projects between 2012 and 2020, and NIH scientists in 2016 expressing concern about supposedly paused hybrid “chimera” virus research.

However, much of that reporting was done after 2020, when anyone who promoted the lab-leak theory was censored, de-platformed and cast as a conspiracy theorist.

Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, expressed frustration that the lab-leak theory is only now being vindicated.

“Ever since I put out my [May 2020] preprint [research paper] saying that an accidental lab origin was possible, I was criticized as a conspiracy theorist,” Chan told Shellenberger, Taibbi and Gutentag.

“If this info had been made public in May of 2020, I doubt that many in the scientific community and the media would have spent the last three years raving about a raccoon dog or pangolin in a wet market.”

The Directorate of National Intelligence is expected to release previously classified material next week. Shellenberger, Taibbi and Gutentag said this material may include the names of the three WIV scientists who were the likely among the first to be sickened by SARS-CoV-2.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Mass. Middle School Students Slap Back at LGBT Cancel Cult

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Children in a Massachusetts middle school tore down the Pride decorations and chanted that their pronouns were “USA” as a protest to the LGBT indoctrinators forcing them to wear rainbow-colored clothing to school.

On June 2, students at Marshall Simonds Middle School in Burlington, Mass., were asked to wear rainbow-colored shirts to celebrate “Pride Month,” according to the Daily Mail. However, the plans of child groomers did not work out the way that they hoped. The students started the protest by tearing up Pride flag stickers and chanting “USA are my pronouns.”

Additionally, the students destroyed other decorations, including the quote from American playwright Tennessee Williams, signage saying the school was a “safe space” and “equality for everyone” decorations.

Parents of the students said that the children felt forced to participate and offended by the Tennessee Williams quote that reiterated that the human heart is “curved like a road through the mountains” and only lines and streets can be straight.

“Kids know when they’re being groomed and I’m proud of these kids for resisting!” Rogan O’Handley wrote on Twitter.

However, instead of supporting one set of parents people and their children, Superintendent of Burlington Public Schools Eric Conti released a letter smearing them as homophobes.

“I recognize that discussions and celebrations of individual identity are complex and impacted by individual values, religions and cultural norms, the result of which may include expressions of racism, anti-religious hate, ableism and, in this case, homophobia,” he wrote.

Other members of the LGBT cult also criticized any challenge opposing radical propaganda for sexual deviancy.

“These displays of intolerance and homophobia are unacceptable and impact the whole community,” Burlington Equity Coalition Co-Chair, Nancy Bonassera, said.

In addition, the parents who support the grooming of children stated that the DEI board that was dissolved in 2022 should be reinstated.

The school itself also had a meeting with students after the backlash to “educate them about how their behaviors affect others, to take responsibility for their behaviors and to help us become a more inclusive community where all of us feel that we belong,” according to Burlington School Committee Chairwoman Martha Simon.

Even CNN Admits DOJ Slow-Walking of Hunter Biden Investigation is ‘Preposterous’

(Headline USA) A CNN legal analyst admitted Monday that the Justice Department’s ludicrous slow-walking of the federal investigation into Hunter Biden was “beyond anything” he had ever seen.

“This is preposterous,” said senior legal analyst Elie Honig. “This has been pending, according to our reporting at CNN, since 2018—five years.”

Honig pointed out that the scope of the federal probe, which is focused on possible tax violations and money laundering stemming from his international business deals, as well as an illegal gun purchase.

“By the way, this investigation is not the laptop,” Honig, a former Manhattan assistant U.S. attorney, explained.

“This investigation is a tax issue: Did Hunter Biden declare his income? And a sort of obscure gun law: Did he possess a gun while he was addicted to drugs—which you’re not allowed to do under federal law—did he lie about that?” he continued. “But five years? I mean, that’s a five-week investigation. And this spans the Trump administration and the Biden administration.”

The slow pace of the probe has been a particular sticking point for supporters of former President Donald Trump, who was criminally indicted for the second time in just a few short weeks under what many consider to be highly dubious circumstances involving novel interpretations of the law.

Honig said that “someone’s got to make a call on this case.”

“I don’t know what is going on,” he said. “It’s beyond anything I’ve seen before.”

An IRS whistleblower accused the Justice Department last month of deliberately slow-walking the investigation into Hunter Biden for political reasons.

The whistleblower, who had been tasked with overseeing the probe into Hunter Biden’s finances, said prosecutors’ handling of the case was so off-base that he felt the need to come forward.

“There were multiple steps that were slow-walked—were just completely not done—at the direction of the Department of Justice,” Gary Shapley, a 14-year veteran of the agency, told CBS News.

When I took control of this particular investigation, I immediately saw deviations from the normal process,” he added. “It was way outside the norm of what I’ve experienced in the past.”

Did Woke Kellogg’s Just Admit that Tony the Tiger Is into ‘Bears’ and ‘Fisting’?

(Headline USA) Kellogg’s is the latest company to come under fire for embracing a radical LGBT agenda after its signature mascot “Tony the Tiger” was seen posing with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney at the Tony Awards this week.

Mulvaney, who identifies as a female, shared a video on Instagram linking arms with and posing for pictures with the Frosted Flakes mascot.

“Folks, we have a new boycott to add to the list and I’m truly sorry to say it because I love this brand,” conservative political strategist Joey Mannarino tweeted afterwards. “The Frosted Flakes mascot, Tony the Tiger, has just posed for a photo with Dylan Mulvaney and even acted like a fan. That’s always been my line. You associate with Dylan Mulvaney and you’re done with me.”

This isn’t the first time Kellogg’s has cozied up to the LGBT crowd. In 2021, the company partnered with the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation to sell a pride-themed cereal called “Together with Pride.”

The cereal box showed the brand’s famous mascots, including “Tony the Tiger,” celebrating the gay rainbow, and included a box that encouraged children to add their pronouns to it.

Kellogg’s also featured Tony the Tiger in an Atlanta Pride advertisement, writing “At Kellogg, we’re an evolving culture that respects and accepts employees’ sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression so that all employees can be authentic and fully engaged.”

The appropriation of the anthropomorphic cereal mascot, alongside Fruit Loops’ Toucan Sam (known for his rainbow-colored beak) is no accident.

Some members of the LGBT community have long suspected that Tony the Tiger’s famous red handkerchief is a subversive “hanky code” that signals his sexual fetishes. According to Onyx NY Northeast, the “hanky code” is a “longstanding tradition and means of communication within the LGBT community.”

“The hanky code is a color-coded system in which an individual wears a specific colored handkerchief in their back pocket(s) to inform others of their sexual interests and roles. Placing a hanky in the left pocket indicates the wearer’s alignment with a top/dominant role, while a hanky in the right pocket indicates the wearer’s alignment with a bottom/submissive role,” the group said.

It seems that Kellog’s has decided to lean into that interpretation of Tony and, in doing so, acknowledge that he is, per “hanky code” into the practice of “fisting.”

But Sugar Bear, the mascot of Post’s Golden Crisp cereal, had better look out if Tony’s hanky has a black stripe on it, which signals that the wearer is into “bears.”

RFK Jr. Suggests Water Supply May Be Turning Kids Transgender

(Headline USA) Democrat presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suggested during a recent interview with the Daily Wire’s Jordan B. Peterson that there could be a connection between gender dysphoria and the chemicals used in our water supply.

Referring to a study into the effects of atrazine, a common herbicide, Kennedy said a direct link between sexual dysphoria and chemicals has been documented in other species. The study exposed dozens of frogs to atrazine and found that 30 of them ended up being incapable of reproducing, and four actually began to physically resemble female frogs despite being male.

“They’re swimming through a soup of toxic chemicals today,” Kennedy argued. “If you put atrazine in a tank with frogs, it will chemically castrate and forcibly feminize the frogs in there. The male frogs will turn into fully viable females capable of producing viable eggs. If it’s doing that to frogs, there’s a lot of evidence that it’s doing it to human beings as well.”

RFK Jr. is well-known for his willingness to push the Overton window on various topics, including vaccines. As a result, he’s been labeled a conspiracy theorist by establishment organizations and even deplatformed. Earlier this month, for example, Instagram banned Kennedy’s presidential campaign from its platform.

“@instagram still hasn’t reinstated my account, which was banned years ago with more than 900k followers,” he wrote on Twitter. “To silence a major political candidate is profoundly undemocratic. Social media is the modern equivalent of the town square. How can democracy function if only some candidates have access to it?”

ABC News also censored an interview with RFK Jr. after he brought up his beliefs about vaccinations.

“We should note that during our conversation, Kennedy made false claims about the COVID-19 vaccines,” the outlet said after the interview aired. “Data shows that the COVID-19 vaccine has prevented millions of hospitalizations and deaths from the disease.”

FBI’s 278,000 Unlawful FISA Queries Were ‘Unintentional,’ Deputy Director Claims

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Unsealed Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court documents revealed last month that the FBI improperly searched through Americans’ communications more than 278,000 times—spying on Black Lives Matter activists, Jan. 6 protestors and more than 19,000 political donors.

According to FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate, those searchers were “unintentional.” Abbate said this to Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., Tuesday at a hearing on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

“Wow, so you’re saying that 280,000 queries of Americans was unintentional?” Hawley asked.

“That’s how they were assessed by the team that did the review,” Abbate responded. “I’m not satisfied with that, which is why we implemented further measures.”

Abbate’s assertion that the illegal searches were “unintentional” is because Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act allows U.S. government agencies to target foreigners outside the U.S. for intelligence purposes—which often results in the “incidental” collection of Americans’ communications.

But given the rampant abuse of Section 702, there’s an emerging bipartisan consensus that the law should be reformed to require a warrant to spy on Americans. Section 702 sunsets at the end of the year unless reauthorized by Congress.

Lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle reiterated their calls for a Section 702 warrant requirement at Tuesday’s hearing.

“There is no doubt that Section 702 is a valuable tool for collecting foreign intelligence, but, as I have said for years, Section 702 also raises serious constitutional concerns,” said the committee’s chairman, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, added: “Democrats and Republicans agree that FBI can’t be trusted to wield its FISA authority responsibly. It’s time to clip FBI’s wings. I’m working on bipartisan FISA reforms to protect Americans from warrantless ‘backdoor’ FISA searches.”

The Senate’s calls for Section 702 reform are similar to those coming from the House. After the aforementioned FISC court documents were unsealed last month, top members from the House Judiciary Committee both called for the institution of warrant requirements.

“Chris Wray told us we can sleep well at night because of the FBI’s so-called FISA reforms. But it just keeps getting worse,” Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said last week in reaction to the opinion.

His colleague, Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., made a similar statement.

“The FBI says that they have instituted new procedures to make this kind of abuse impossible. They have made that promise before,” he said. “Without significant changes to the law to prevent this abuse, I will oppose the reauthorization of this authority.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Man Locked Out of Home after Amazon Doorbell Accuses Him of Racism

(Jacob Bruns, Headline USA) An American man was accused of racism by his doorbell, and subsequently shut out of all of the Amazon accounts in his “smart home.”

According to Brandon Jackson’s account of the events, he was locked out of his home by Amazon and its technologies for nearly a week, beginning this past May 25 and continuing until May 31, Revolver reported.

“I finally regained access to my Amazon account after an unexpected and unwarranted lockout that lasted nearly a week, from Thursday, May 25,” Jackson wrote.

“This wasn’t just a simple inconvenience, though. I have a smart home, and my primary means of interfacing with all the devices and automations is through Amazon Echo devices via Alexa.”

After initially getting locked out of his Amazon accounts and all the appliances involved in a smart house, Jackson began investigating Amazon’s reasoning as he tried to regain access.

But upon inquiring with an Amazon executive, it was revealed that the woke corporation believed him to be racist based on recent alleged remarks he made to an Amazon delivery driver.

“When I connected with the executive, they asked if I knew why my account had been locked,” Jackson wrote.

“When I answered I was unsure, their tone turned somewhat accusatory. I was told that the driver who had delivered my package reported receiving racist remarks from my ‘Ring doorbell.'”

Jackson was locked out for his alleged racism without being informed why, and without any investigation on the part of Amazon.

After reviewing the footage, Jackson noticed that the delivery driver had earphones in, and thus must have misheard the doorbell’s automated response of “excuse me, can I help you?”

From that point on, Jackson was locked out of his Amazon accounts, and his Alexa was disabled.

Some on Twitter questioned why Jackson would cede so much control in his life to Amazon and its spy robots.

Taco Jill Applauds ‘Bravery’ at White House ‘Trannies Gone Wild’ Party

(Corine Gatti, Headline USA) A biologically male transgender activist baring surgically constructed breasts drew mixed reactions at the Biden administration’s gay “Pride” celebration Saturday, with some applauding the stunning and brave gesture even as the White House officially condemned it.

The White House resembled an LGBT version of the Playboy Mansion after Rose Montoya, 27, went topless in front of the Truman Balcony with the rainbow “Pride” flag hanging in the background, the New York Post reported.

Montoya shared the obscene footage to Instagram as part of a montage that included a video in which the transgender influencer shook hands with President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden.

“It is an honor,” Montoya told Joe Biden as they shook hands. “Trans rights are human rights.” 

Jill Biden had earlier applauded the “bravery” of transgender people in her speech and blasted those who opposed them.

“We’re not here to be courageous,” she said. “Even though for so many of you, just coming to this event is an act of bravery.”

However, the first lady should’ve been worried about what was going on inside the gates on the South Lawn and critics condemned Montoya as an embarrassment to the nation.

“No, this isn’t another hookers-n-blow photo from Hunter’s laptop, it was the Pride party on the White House lawn two days ago hosted by Joe,” tweeted conservative radio host Dana Loesch.

Bernard Kerik , former New York police commissioner, likewise expressed his disappointment in the Biden administration.

“OK, so who is running the f***ing White House and allowing this deviant garbage to go on right outside the oval office?” Kerik said.

Montoya addressed the controversy surrounding the topless appearance in the video, and said it was legal in Washington, DC.

“It’s ridiculous that people are trying to use this as an excuse to vilify trans people,” the Idaho-based activist said.

The TikTok influencer also expressed support for “freeing the nipple” in a response video, Fox News reported.

@rosemontoya Free the nipple #trans ♬ original sound – Rose Montoya

The White House condemned the incident and banned Montoya from future events at the White House.

“This behavior is inappropriate and disrespectful for any event at the White House,” a White House spokesperson told the New York Post.

“It is not reflective of the event we hosted to celebrate LGBTQI+ families or the other hundreds of guests who were in attendance. Individuals in the video will not be invited to future events.”

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, who is black and gay, reiterated her disappointment in a briefing Tuesday, MSN reported.

“So, you know, we’re going to continue to be clear on that. And that type of behavior is, as I said, unacceptable. It’s not appropriate. It’s disrespectful,” Jean-Pierre said.”

“And let’s not—it really does not reflect the event that we hosted to celebrate the LGBTQ plus families, again, hundreds of families who were here to celebrate their community and who were here in attendance,” she added. “So look, individuals in the video, certainly will not be invited to future events.”