FBI Agent in Hunter Biden Laptop Scandal May Have Perjured Himself

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) On the same day the New York Post published its bombshell story about Hunter Biden’s laptop on Oct. 14, 2020, FBI officials held a meeting with Twitter and Facebook—with agents refusing the confirm the laptop’s authenticity, which resulted in Twitter blocking the story from being shared and Facebook deamplifying it.

One of the FBI agents involved in this scandal, Elvis Chan, was deposed last October for the landmark Missouri v. Biden censorship case. There, he said that he had no further contact with social media companies about the Hunter Biden laptop after that Oct. 14, 2020, meeting.

But this is false, according to House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who on Monday released the latest batch of Facebook Files—a trove of internal records showing the company’s censorship decisions. The latest files include an email from a Facebook employee—who was also a former FBI agent—about a “follow-up” meeting he had with Chan the next day on Oct. 15, 2020.

“I spoke with SSA Elvis Chan (FBI San Francisco) on 15 October 2020, as a follow-up to the call with the Foreign Influence Task Foce on 14 October. I asked SSA Chan whether there was any update or change since the discussion on 14 October 2020 as to whether the FBI saw any evidence suggesting foreign sponsorship or direction of the leak information related to Hunter Biden,” states the email from the Facebook employee, whose name is redacted.

“SSA Chan advised that he was up to speed on the current state of the matter within the FBI and that there was no current evidence to suggest any foreign connection or direction of the leak.”

Jordan noted that Chan’s remark about being “up to speed” on the Hunter Biden matter also undermines his earlier testimony that he had “no internal knowledge of [the FBI’s Hunter Biden laptop] investigation.”

Jordan’s disclosure follows another major revelation about the Hunter Biden social media censorship last month, when testimony from FBI official Laura Dehmlow was made public—showing that the bureau knew the laptop was authentic at the time it was cautioning social media about Russian disinformation.

“Somebody from Twitter essentially asked whether the laptop was real. And one of the FBI folks who was on the call did confirm that ‘yes, it was,’ before another participant jumped in and said, ‘No further comment,’” Dehmlow told the Judiciary Committee last month, according to Jordan.

“Of course, there was ‘no evidence’ of ‘any foreign connection,'” Jordan said Monday about his recent disclosures. “The laptop was real, and the FBI knew it.”

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Patriot Front Members Sue Leftist for Infiltrating, Doxxing Group

(Ken Silva, Headline USA) Members of the right-wing nationalist group Patriot Front are suing a left-wing activist who infiltrated the organization and released their personal information online—claiming that the infiltrator violated their First Amendment rights.

The lawsuit from Patriot Front members targets David Capito, who apparently changed his name to Vyacheslav Arkadyevich Arkhangelskiy last year. According to the lawsuit, Capito is a member of the Antifa-affiliated Puget Sound John Brown Gun Club.

Capito joined Patriot Front in July 2021 under the false name “Vincent Washington,” with the intent to dox the group, according to the lawsuit, which was filed last month in federal court.

“Because of Capito’s experience as a professional photographer, Patriot Front assigned him to take photos for some of their local get-togethers in the Pacific Northwest,” the lawsuit said.

“When nobody was watching, Capito abused his role by taking photographs of members’ license plates and other personal information in order to expose their identities later,” the Patriot Front members said in the lawsuit.

“Using his false identity, Capito also ingratiated himself into the social circles of some Patriot Front members, where he used hidden microphones and cameras to record them.”

In November 2021, Capito worked with left-wing hackers to download a trove of internal Patriot Front communications, videos and other records, the lawsuit said. The data was then released on left-wing site Unicorn Riot.

As a result of the public doxxing, the Patriot Front plaintiffs lost their jobs, they said. The plaintiffs are Paul Gancarz, Daniel Turetchi, Colton Brown, James Johnson and his wife, Amelia Johnson.

Brown’s parents also kicked him out of their house, the lawsuit stated.

“As a result of Capito’s unlawful actions, which included not only malicious doxxing but trespassing onto the Browns’ property, taking photographs of the property, and posting the photographs as part of the doxxing, Brown lost his job and became estranged from his father, who required him to leave the Brown residence,” the lawsuit stated.

“Brown thus found himself without a home and without a job.”

The plaintiffs accuse Capito of violating the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act—which prohibits the unauthorized use of computers—as well as a variety of state laws. They seek an unspecified amount of money in damages.

Capito has yet to respond to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit is the latest legal battle involving the Patriot Front. The group is also defending itself from a suit that accuses its members of vandalizing a mural honoring black tennis star Arthur Ashe.

Additionally, Patriot Front leader Thomas Rousseau is set to stand trial in Idaho on Sept. 22 for allegedly planning a riot at a pride event last year. Five members were convicted in that case last month and sentenced to several days in jail.

Ken Silva is a staff writer at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/jd_cashless.

Affirmative-Action Lawsuit Looming for Military Academies

(Robert Jonathan, Headline USA) The carve-out that the U.S. Supreme Court allowed for race-based entry to military academies could be subject to further constitutional scrutiny.

Students for Fair Admissions, the nonprofit that convinced the high court to scrap affirmative action in the civilian college admission process, appeared to be gearing up for a lawsuit against the trio of the prestigious, highly competitive U.S. service academies.

In addition to the Army’s West Point school, the Navy’s Annapolis school and the Air Force’s Colorado Springs school, the Coast Guard and Merchant Marines also have highly selective federal academies for training commissioned officers.

In a footnote included its landmark June 29 decision against Harvard University, the court explained that “No military academy is a party to these cases…and none of the courts below addressed the propriety of race-based admissions systems in that context.”

The rationale was likely more procedural than substantive; the court wasy not necessarily saying it condoned racist admissions at the service academies but simply saw the need to distinguish them from non-federal higher-education institutions to avoid any unintended legal implications that may have arisen in other areas (such as, say, student-loan forgiveness).

“This opinion also does not address the issue, in light of the potentially distinct interests that military academies may present,” the footnote concluded.

Nonetheless, through a website called West Point Not Fair, SFFA seemed to be actively seeking potential plaintiffs for a new round of litigation to challenge the safe harbor, as it were, that the court tacitly accepted.

The website reaffirmed that admissions gatekeeping at the military academies based on an applicant’s race/ethnicity was “unfair and unconstitutional.”

SFFA was asking anybody subjected to this form of discrimination to provide contact information and describe what happened.

“Were you rejected from West Point? Or the Naval Academy or the Air Force Academy? It may be because you’re the wrong race. Or are you a high school senior and plan to apply to any of these service academies?” it asked. “Tell us your story.”

Assuming SFFA gets any takers from those who have the elements of a discrimination claim, it could likely take years for a case of this nature to work its way through the federal judiciary.

And there is no certainty that the Supreme Court, which gets to pick and choose which cases it wants to hear, would be inclined to accept an appeal from a lower-court ruling about service-academy policies.

The majority opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts did establish, however, a strong precedent by overturning racial preferences in higher education generally.

The litigation also may bringing more public attention to critical race theory material now embedded in military-academy curricula, which undermines national security preparedness even as China is actively seeking to infiltrate U.S. military bases in other ways.

In the meantime, a U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commissioner has stated that the recent Supreme Court decision could raise questions about the continued viability of corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.

Mexican Cartels Hijack DHS-funded App to Facilitate Illegal Immigration: Report

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) A startling exposé by the Washington Examiner has unraveled a deeply troubling saga of how Mexican cartels are exploiting a U.S. government-funded app to facilitate the illegal entry of migrants into the country.

The CBP One app, initially designed to facilitate the orderly immigration process, has been manipulated by the savage Mexican cartels to achieve their illicit objectives, reported the Examiner on August 4.

“Mexican cartels are exploiting the app’s security and found a way to request unlimited appointments for anyone in the world — far beyond the app’s ‘northern Mexico’ geofence,” the exposé details.

The cartels’ audacious feat involves exploiting a glaring security loophole that allows them to request and secure an unbounded number of appointments for individuals across the globe, the conservative outlet reported.

Former Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf sounded a dire warning against the Biden administration. “It’s further evidence as this administration continues to try to come up with a new security paradigm along that border that I don’t think they really understand it,” Wolfe said.

Similarly, several prominent Republican lawmakers reacted in outrage to the explosive report, with Sen. John Cornyn, Texas, sharing the news with the caption, “Surprise, surprise.” 

Rep. Lauren Boebert, Colo., chimed in with her reaction, stating, “Perhaps our immigration system shouldn’t be handled by an app. Yet another example of utter incompetence by Mayorkas.”  

Rep. Tony Gonzalez, Texas, echoed Boebert’s remarks, adding, “The Biden administration’s CBP One app has been a disaster since day 1.” 

The malevolent ingenuity demonstrated by these criminal organizations in exploiting the app’s vulnerabilities has unleashed a torrent of illegal immigration, straining border enforcement to a perilous breaking point. 

As reported by the Examiner, the investigation reveals an alarming directive from Mexico’s National Immigration Institute, instructing officials to bar entry to non-Mexican citizens unless they possess a valid CBP One app appointment.  

Exploiting this directive, cartels have instituted a nefarious system that coerces immigrants into paying exorbitant fees for access to the app and a virtual private network (VPN) service. This VPN service, a cloak of invisibility for the cartels’ clients, conceals their actual location, allowing them to subvert the app’s designated boundaries. 

Despite vehement denials by a CBP spokesperson, who vehemently refuted claims of a hacked app, the reality on the ground underscores a disturbing truth, reported the news outlet.

White House Under Fire over ‘Disturbing’ Plot to Muzzle Journalists

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The Biden administration is under scrutiny and facing accusations of suppressing conservative voices in the media, as reports emerge of a significant reduction in White House press credentials.  

According to Fox News, over 30% of journalists, totaling at least 442 individuals, have reportedly lost their hard pass credentials, leading to concerns about press freedom and transparency within the administration. 

Fox News contributor Joe Concha shared his insights on this issue during an interview with Will Cain. Concha remarked, “Well, it’s disturbing but not surprising, Will. This is the least accessible president of our lifetimes. This is the least transparent administration of our time.” 

Concha pointed out the apparent lack of engagement by President Joe Biden with the press, emphasizing that he had not held any solo press conferences on U.S. soil since the previous November.  

“Think about that. You can take a baby to full term, nine months, before this president has stood in front of reporters at that White House and has taken questions for an extended period of time,” Concha added. 

Drawing comparisons to previous administrations, Concha highlighted the contrast with former President Donald Trump’s approach.  

“During the Obama-Biden administration, they rejected more Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests than any other administration in history,” he stated. He also mentioned instances of media restrictions, stating, “They secretly seized the phone records of AP reporters. They spied on a former Fox correspondent in James Rosen.”

Concha asserted, “Democrats and this administration have a disdain for the First Amendment in general, and this latest taking away of hard press passes is another dib bit.”

Earlier in the interview, Will Cain described how the new policy is affecting journalists. Specifically, he said, “At least 442 reporters reportedly losing their White House hard pass credentials, more than a 30% cut of journalists under the administration’s new restrictions of the media.”

Joe Biden Slapped w/ New Lawsuit over Student Loan ‘Scheme’

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The Biden administration is facing a scathing lawsuit over its newly launched student loan forgiveness plan.

The legal challenge, brought forward by the conservative group New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), alleges that the Department of Education violated the U.S. Constitution when it released the plan.

NCLA, on behalf of the Cato Institute and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, vehemently criticized the plan in a press release announcing the lawsuit on August 4.

Detailing what they believe to be an illegal “scheme,” NCLA explained, “The latest scheme would immediately wipe out $39 billion of student loan debt owed to the U.S. Treasury by more than 800,000 people under the Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) program by crediting non-payments during periods of forbearance as monthly payments.”

The conservative group added, “The plan would cancel even more debt prematurely at taxpayer expense for another 2.8 million IDR borrowers in the future. The Department has no lawful authority to do this.”

NCLA argues that the Biden administration’s plan directly violates the Constitution’s Appropriations Clause. The group explained that the clause “grants Congress near-exclusive authority to cancel debt owed to the Treasury.”

The Supreme Court initially struck down an earlier version of the plan, citing the Biden administration’s lack of authority to expand a program initially aimed at aiding veterans fighting student loans.

Similarly, the group contends that the Biden administration’s approach sidesteps requirements in the already-active “Public Service Loan Forgiveness” program, which allows borrowers to have their loans forgiven if they complete ten years of work for non-profits while also making monthly payments.

In a scathing rebuke, Sheng Li, Litigation Counsel at NCLA, asserted, “[T]he strategy seems to be to cancel $39 billion faster than a court can review and stop this blatantly unlawful act.”

Mark Chenoweth, President and General Counsel at NCLA, echoed Li’s concerns, stating unequivocally, “Non-payments are not payments. No amount of nonsense changes the essential fact Congress required debtors to make payments before receiving debt relief.”

In response to the lawsuit, the Biden administration issued a statement to the Washington Post, characterizing it as “a desperate attempt from right-wing special interests to keep hundreds of thousands of borrowers in debt, even though these borrowers have earned the forgiveness that is promised through income-driven repayment plans.”

Levin Shreds Dems over Al Gore’s 2000 Election Challenge Hypocrisy

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Renowned conservative commentator Mark Levin recently delved into the history of U.S. elections, drawing attention to the 2000 presidential election while addressing contemporary political debates.  

During a Sunday segment on Liberty and Levin, Levin discussed the events surrounding the disputed 2000 election and questioned why former Vice President Al Gore and former challengers to presidential elections throughout history were not prosecuted. 

Levin highlighted the contrast between historical incidents and the present-day perception of events, particularly referencing the January 6 Capitol riot. 

“January 6 — this past cycle — was said to be an insurrection and President Trump was said to be building seditious conspiracy theories,” Levin remarked. “We had a whole January 6 Commission set up by Nancy Pelosi. She picked the Democrats and the Republicans. She rejected the Republicans that Leader McCarthy had chosen.”

Turning to the 2000 election, Levin provided a comprehensive analysis. He recounted how Al Gore’s legal challenges unfolded after the election came down to a few hundred votes in Florida.

“Al gore brings first lawsuit it is then litigation hell, different districts throughout the state, and trying to find judges that would up hold this part of law the that part of the law,” Levin remarked.

Levin also drew attention the Florida Supreme Court, which came under scrutiny from the U.S. Supreme Court. He said, “Meanwhile the radical left wing Democrat-control Florida Supreme Court steps in and it keeps changing the law, changing the law, changing the law, to try to get gore over the finish line, U.S. Supreme Court steps in and says, ‘That’s enough.'”

Earlier in the segment, Levin raised an intriguing point by questioning why challengers to elections had faced no legal consequences until Trump. Specifically, he said, “It’s amazing, nobody was indicted, nobody was charged with anything.”

He contrasted this with the prevailing narrative surrounding the events of January 6, suggesting a double standard in how these incidents have been treated. 

In an interesting turn, former President Donald Trump had taken to his social media platform, Truth Social, to encourage his supporters to watch Levin’s Fox News show. This move by Trump showcases the ongoing influence and collaboration between conservative figures and media outlets.

On a Sunday post, Trump said, “[Levin] gets the Fake Indictments, Voter Fraud, and Election Interference better than anyone, and he’s not afraid to say it – PATRIO! 10 minutes.”

Levin’s comments come in the wake of another recent statement he made on Twitter, where he speculated about the potential use of the Supremacy Clause for a self-pardon by Trump from state charges.

GOP Reps. Detail Damning Allegations of Biden Family’s Actions

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) In a recent appearance on Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures with host Maria Bartiromo, GOP Reps. Byron Donalds, Fla., and Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ga., made a striking case, presenting what they referred to as “clear evidence” of alleged crimes involving President Joe Biden’s family.  

The lawmakers, appearing in the same segment, detailed the damning allegations embroiling President Joe Biden and his family. Donalds began by spotlighting the controversial nexus between Hunter Biden and Ukrainian energy company Burisma.  

He cited a bid and a business meeting at Café Milano involving Joe Biden and Burisma executives, followed by a board meeting in Dubai where concerns about Washington, D.C. were allegedly raised. 

Donalds emphasized that these incidents hinted at a connection, stating, “Hunter Biden goes on the board simply because he’s the conduit to Joe Biden.” 

The conversation then shifted to the ousting of Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shoken and Joe Biden’s subsequent actions.  

Donalds stated, “Three months later Shokin, the prosecutor in Ukraine, is fired and Joe Biden brags about using or withholding a billion dollars in U.S. aid, putting pressure on Ukraine to get the prosecutor fired.”

He concluded that this sequence constituted an “open and shut, damning case of bribery” involving the former vice president. 

When Greene took the stage, she echoed Donalds’s allegations and delved into financial transactions. 

She cited the now-infamous FD-1023 informant file from the FBI that outlines an alleged $5 million bribe to then-Vice President Joe Biden in 2015. 

She continued by referencing Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) from the Treasury Department, which she claimed provided “clear proof of allege[d] crimes.”  

She explained, “We have clear evidence of wire transfers from countries all over the world — China, Ukraine, Romania — going into these dozens of LLCs.”  

Greene emphasized Hunter Biden’s business ventures and asserted that Joe Biden was deeply entangled. She quoted a 2011 letter allegedly written by Joe Biden, which Greene stated “just proves that Joe Biden has lied repeatedly to the American people.”

She further contended that Joe Biden’s involvement extended beyond what was previously known, claiming, “Joe Biden himself is the brand.” 

Farage Says Banks Are Ready to Run ‘Word Checks’ On Customers’ Social Media

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Brexit’s Nigel Farage revealed that banks are working with credit agencies to roll out “word checks” of social media accounts to make sure they won’t be providing services to conservatives.

The times of banks being merely the institutions that take deposits and then make loans — and make some profit by doing so — are long gone because now banks have become “highly politically active,” Farage told Breitbart.

He started to fight against leftist banks in the United Kingdom after he was canceled by his bank for not being a leftist — the political belief system of the bank itself.

Farage warned people that if they won’t start fighting against this fascist way of doing business, it will only get worse. Additionally, he revealed even more intrusive steps that banks will soon take to ensure that conservatives would not be able to pay bills or make purchases.

One of these steps is signing up for Environmental, Social and Governance [ESG] programs that seem to be employing “wokies” who “are just filled with an almost hatred for people who don’t subscribe to their world view,” Farage said.

“The argument I’ve been making is if they can do it to me, they can certainly do it to you. What we do know is the British clearing banks are now working with some of the credit agencies to put in place word checks on the social media accounts of their customers,” he added.

“You can see the direction… we are literally on the verge of this happening. So we really have to start shouting.”

Anti-woke capitalism campaigner also said that he already received “thousands and thousands” of responses from the public to his call to come forward and reveal their own experience of either being canceled or mistreated by their banks.

“We have got a really relentless drive towards a cashless society, towards central bank digital currencies, where our lives will be completely controlled”, Farage said, speaking of the emerging social credit score-like system that is currently being developed.

Record Number of Terrorists Seized at Southern Border

(Casey Harper, The Center Square) – The number of terror suspects captured trying to enter the U.S. illegally has soared since President Joe Biden took office.

But with more than 1 million unidentified foreign nationals evading apprehension after entering the U.S., the potential that at least some are on the international terrorist watch list poses a potential major threat to national security and raises the chances of terror attacks, observers warn.

Federal data shows 525 known or suspected terrorists were apprehended by agents at the northern and southern borders as they tried to illegally enter the country through the first nine months of this fiscal year. That is up from 478 all of last fiscal year.

The elevated figure does not include the terror suspects who illegally entered the country and evaded arrest, what U.S. Custom and Border Protection calls “gotaways.” According to CBP agents who spoke exclusively to The Center Square, there have been 1.7 million “gotaways” since the beginning of 2021, when Biden took office, at least some of whom could have been on the terror suspect list. CBP doesn’t release gotaway data publicly.

“Our open borders and easily abused asylum policies are not just a magnet for millions of economic migrants, they are also an open invitation for people who are intent on doing harm to our nation,” Ira Mehlman of the Federation for American Immigration Reform told The Center Square. “International terrorist organizations and criminal cartels are very aware of our vulnerabilities and will not hesitate to exploit them.”

The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request from The Center Square for comment.

Lora Ries, former acting deputy chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security, told The Center Square that the current state of the border is a major national security threat.

“Remember, the 9/11 terrorist attacks were carried out by just 19 people,” said Ries, who now works as an analyst at the Heritage Foundation. “As this administration lets millions of unknown and potentially dangerous aliens into the country with no oversight, the question of the next attack on American soil becomes less of an ‘if’ and almost certainly ‘when?’”

An overwhelmed border was on full display in a recent government watchdog report. A DHS Office of Inspector General report released in June showed that border patrol agents caught and released a migrant into the U.S. even though the migrant was on the terror watch list.

The report points out that because of miscommunication and problems sharing information within the government, it took U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement weeks to arrest the terror suspect in the U.S., more than enough time to execute an attack.

“This occurred because CBP’s ineffective practices and processes for resolving inconclusive matches with the Terrorist Watchlist led to multiple mistakes,” the report said. “For example, CBP sent a request to interview the migrant to the wrong email address, obtained information requested by the [FBI Terrorism Screening Center] but never shared it, and released the migrant before fully coordinating with the TSC.”

With incidents like this and the continued flood of illegal immigration, experts say the nation is at risk because of the chaos at the southern border.

“But what is more worrisome is how many people on the terror watch list might be among the 1.5 million known gotaways who have entered under President Biden’s watch,” said Mehlman, who formerly worked for the U.S. House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee. “Border Patrol agents will tell you that while they have been tied up processing economic migrants making fraudulent asylum claims, the cartels have been taking advantage of the situation to bring in contraband and people who are coming for other reasons.”

While media focus on terrorism has declined since the attacks in 2001 and ensuing overseas conflicts, the FBI still considers it a top threat. In a speech for students at Texas A&M University earlier this year, FBI Director Christopher Wray said “the terrorism threat today is as persistent and complex as ever.” He also noted the “serious threats coming across our Southwest border,” which includes cartel activity and fentanyl.

Mehlman argues border agents do not have the resources to vet the flood of illegal migrants captured at the border.

“Given the volume of people entering the country – more than 7 million people have entered the U.S. illegally under this administration – the border enforcement agencies do not have the time or resources to thoroughly vet people before they are released,” he said.

Ries told The Center Square that many of the migrants are also from rivals of the U.S., like China, also opening the door to further spying.

“Some of those ‘gotaways’ are undoubtedly from adversarial countries, like China,” Ries said. “The number of Chinese nationals encountered at the border has more than doubled since 2020. Meanwhile, the CCP has tried repeatedly to spy on Americans and a Chinese-owned lab was discovered in California harboring dangerous bioweapons.”