Mexico Assuages Left-Wing Fears over Lack of ‘Abortion Access’

0

(Headline USA) As pro-abortion left-wingers consider permanently fleeing the United States over worries that a federal abortion ban may one day restrict their right to promiscuous, unprotected sexual intercourse, the porous southern border may prove to be a godsend.

Only, this time, the immigration may be flowing in the reverse direction, sending shiftless and irresponsible undesirables southward where the may be guaranteed unfettered access to abortions that are legal, safe—and possibly even free.

A Mexican Supreme Court decision to end the federal ban on abortion extended a regional trend of increasing access to the procedure, but left in place a patchwork of varying state restrictions.

The high court on Wednesday threw out all federal criminal penalties for abortion, in a ruling that will require the federal public health service to offer the procedure to anyone who requests it.

That will mean access for millions of Mexicans since the social security service and other federal institutions provide health care to most people who work in the formal economy.

Some 20 Mexican states, however, still criminalize abortion. Those laws were not affected by the Supreme Court ruling, but abortion advocates will likely ask state judges to follow its logic.

Abortions are not widely prosecuted as a crime in Mexico, but many doctors refuse to provide them, citing the law.

Celebration of the ruling soon spilled out onto social media.

“Today is a day of victory and justice for Mexican women!” Mexico’s National Institute for Women wrote in a message on Twitter. The government organization called the decision a “big step” toward gender equality.

Sen. Olga Sánchez Cordero, a former Supreme Court justice, applauded the ruling, saying that it represented an advance toward “a more just society in which the rights of all are respected.”

She called on Mexico’s Congress to pass legislation in response.

But others in the highly religious country decried the decision. Irma Barrientos, director of the Civil Association for the Rights of the Conceived, said opponents will continue the fight against expanded abortion access.

“We’re not going to stop,” Barrientos said. “Let’s remember what happened in the United States. After 40 years, the Supreme Court reversed its abortion decision, and we’re not going to stop until Mexico guarantees the right to life from the moment of conception.”

In its ruling, the Mexican court said that “the legal system that criminalized abortion” in federal law was unconstitutional because it “violates the human rights of women and people with the ability to gestate.”

The decision came two years after the court ruled that abortion was not a crime in one northern state. That decision set off a slow state-by-state process of decriminalizing it.

Last week, the central state of Aguascalientes became the 12th to drop criminal penalties.

Abortion activists will have to continue seeking legalization state by state, though Wednesday’s decision should make that easier. State legislatures can also act on their own to erase abortion penalties.

For now, the ruling does not mean that every Mexican woman will be able to access the procedure immediately, explained Fernanda Díaz de León, sub-director and legal expert for women’s rights group IPAS.

What it does do—in theory—is obligate federal agencies to provide the care to patients. That’s likely to have a cascade of effects.

Díaz de León said removing the federal ban takes away another excuse used by care providers to deny abortions in states where the procedure is no longer a crime.

It also allows women with formal employment who are part of the social security system and government employees to seek the procedure in federal institutions in states where the abortion is still criminalized, she said.

Díaz de León and officials at other feminist organizations worry that women, particularly in more conservative areas, may still be denied abortions.

“It’s a very important step,” Díaz de León said. But “we need to wait to see how this is going to be applied and how far it reaches.”

Mexico City was the first Mexican jurisdiction to decriminalize abortion 16 years ago.

Observers in Mexico agreed that it would take time to see how Wednesday’s ruling is applied.

In the southern state of Guerrero, Marina Reyna, director of the Guerrero Association Against Violence toward Women, cautioned that challenges would persist. Her state decriminalized abortion last year, but there are 22 open investigations against women accused of ending their pregnancies.

“There is still a lot of resistance,” she said.

Meanwhile, U.S. women have an array of options to choose from even after the overturn of Roe v. Wade triggered a raft of so-called heartbeat laws from red states—and, in some cases, activated laws that had been in place before the 50-year-old decision legalized abortion nationwide during the peak of the 1970s “free love” movement.

Across Latin America, countries have made moves to lift abortion restrictions in recent years, a trend often referred to as a “green wave,” in reference to the green bandanas carried by women protesting for abortion rights in the region.

After decades of work by activists across the region, the trend picked up speed in Argentina, which in 2020 legalized the procedure. In 2022, Colombia, a highly conservative country, did the same.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

National Archives That Sold Out Trump Now Scrambling to Protect Biden

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) The National Archives and Records Administration that served up former President Donald Trump to the Biden Justice Department for allegedly possessing classified documents, setting the stage for the DOJ’s militarized raid on Mar-a-Lago, are now reportedly withholding information that could prove critical to ongoing investigations of President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter.

House Oversight Committee Chair Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., on Wednesday blasted NARA officials for refusing to turn over documents the committee had requested, claiming the information is “personal.”

Comer detailed his concerns in a letter to Archivist of the United States Colleen Shogan, writing, “In discussions between NARA and Committee staff regarding the Committee’s previous request for special access to Vice-Presidential records, NARA informed the Committee that certain documents in NARA’s custody would not be produced to the Committee – and, indeed, NARA would not inform the Committee of their existence – if NARA deems those records to be ‘personal records’ as defined by the PRA.”

Comer made clear that he didn’t agree with NARA’s interpretation of what constituted so-called personal records.

“However, ‘personal records’ are defined as those records ‘which do not relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of’ the Vice President,” Comer wrote. “The Committee has made clear that its investigation involves potential abuse by then-Vice President Biden of his official duties; it cannot be NARA that determines whether certain records ‘do not relate to or have an effect upon’ those duties.”

House Republicans aren’t alone in their efforts trying to wrest information from the National Archives, and for valid reason. In response to a Freedom of Information Act and lawsuit filed last year by the Southeastern Legal Foundation seeking information on three email aliases Biden was known to use, NARA officials conceded they had nearly 5,400 documents that contained the name of one of Biden’s email pseudonyms, such as Robert L. Peters, JRB Ware or Robin Ware.

Comer’s letter was sent as House Republicans continue probes into a growing mountain of evidence, whistleblowers’ sworn testimonies, bank statements, phone records and text messages that tie Biden to his son’s allegedly corrupt business dealings, including claims of a multi-million-dollar bribery scheme designed to benefit Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

“The Committee is concerned that foreign nationals have sought access and influence by engaging in lucrative business relationships with high-profile political figures’ immediate family members, including members of the Biden family,” Comer wrote in his letter.

If NARA persisted to withhold the requested documents, Comer said his committee wanted NARA to  “produce a log asserting the basis for withholding the document.”

As a parting shot, Comer reminded the nation’s archivist that, “The Committee on Oversight and Accountability has specific jurisdiction over NARA under House Rule X. Additionally, the Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the U.S. House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate ‘any matter’ at ‘any time’ under House Rule X.”

Mark Pellin is an editor at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/sabrepaw70.

Carlson Interview w/ Obama’s Alleged Gay Lover Divides Popular Conservative Commentators

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) Tucker Carlson’s interview with Larry Sinclair, who has long claimed to have engaged in drug-fueled gay sex with Barack Obama, didn’t break any new ground about the allegations, but it did spark an online divide between conservative commentators over whether the claims should be believed.

Carlson’s introductory overview offered no opinion on Sinclair’s veracity, but he said the explosive claims deserved to be given renewed scrutiny.

The allegations Sinclair made during the interview rehashed many of the claims he first made in 2008 when Obama was running for president, and claims that were reiterated during an interview posted by The Liberty Daily earlier this year.

Sinclair said he was introduced to Obama by a limo driver at a Chicago bar in 1999, when the former president was still a relatively unknown Illinois state senator. After allegedly paying Obama to score some cocaine, Sinclair claimed the pair returned to the limo and proceeded to have drug-fueled sex. Obama allegedly showed up the following day at Sinclair’s hotel room for another round of sex and drugs.

Sinclair told Carlson he didn’t learn Obama’s identity until he saw his alleged gay-lover making the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. When Obama launched his 2008 presidential run, Sinclair said he was rebuffed by the campaign concerning his allegations.

Sinclair further claimed he was told by Donald Young, the former choir director of Obama’s spiritual guru Jeremiah Wright’s church, that he also had multiple gay sexual encounters with Obama and feared for his life that he would be silenced before making his allegations public. Young was killed in a Chicago shooting days before the 2007 Iowa Caucus, a homicide case that reportedly was never solved.

When Sinclair first made his allegations public in 2008, his claims were attacked by Obama’s media shills who “batted the claims without refuting them — they’re absurd — and the rest of the media followed suite,” Carlson said.

“But the claims weren’t absurd. We’re not claiming they’re true, but they were certainly credible,” Carlson said.

Social media was split on that assessment, crossing partisan lines in the process. The first lob came from leftist agitator and Trump-hater Ed Krassenstein, who challenged, “If you are going to believe a random guy on Tucker Carlson’s show who claims to have done something with Barack Obama, yet not believe a woman who successfully sued Trump for defamation and assault in a court of law, then you are showing your bias.” The harangue continued, but the general theme echoed with some conservatives.

Renegade podcaster Tim Pool acknowledged as much, tweeting “i agree with this. Any asshole can make up some insane claim about anyone. we saw this with Chrstine Blasey Ford and that other woman who claimed Kavanaugh was having gang rape parties. not interested in WWE news.”

Turning Point USA ambassador Evan Kilgore offered a different takeaway from the interview. “If Larry Sinclair is lying, Obama could easily sue him for defamation… but he doesn’t. He’s been telling this story consistently for years,” Kilgore tweeted.

Conservative commentator Mike Cernovich was more blunt with his assessment.

“Shitlibs said Kavaugh ran a street gang to rape high school kids. In the New Yorker. Sourced to Avenatti. But conservatives be like whoa whoa who I want NO PART of the Obama allegations,” he wrote in a fiery tweet. “How pathetic many of you are. You want little head pats from the left.”

Even Elon Musk weighed in on the issue. “Of course, the probability that his claims are true would have to rest on objective evidence, rather than claims made by someone with a dubious history,” he tweeted.

Others took issue with Carlson’s interview glossing over a large part of that history, which included a felony conviction and a prison stint for forgery, among other shortcomings.

“It’s weird, too, how they omitted the part about the guy failing a polygraph test, then accusing David Axelrod of tampering with the results,” tweeted Giancarlo Sopo, communication strategist and political writer. “There are so many legitimate criticisms one could make of Obama. This is just crap.”

Before Carlson’s interview dropped on Wednesday, RedState’s Bonchie warned of Sinclair’s shady past, noting that “Individual viewers will have to decide how Sinclair’s past speaks to his credibility or lack thereof.” Bonchie offered his own decision after the full interview had aired.

“Not gonna be a popular opinion, but the convicted fraudster who has been grifting for decades probably isn’t telling the truth about having a random gay encounter with Barack Obama in 1999,” he tweeted. “Flame away.”

Mark Pellin is an editor at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/sabrepaw70.

‘You’re Compromised’: Liberty Safe Hands FBI Passcode of Customer’s Gun Safe

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) Liberty Safe, a gun-safe company, is under heavy fire after reportedly letting the FBI take over the contents of a safe allegedly owned by a Trump supporter.

The controversy began when internet personalities, the Hodge Twins, revealed on Wednesday that the FBI had forcefully entered the property of Nathan Hughes, a 34-year-old man, who was allegedly at the U.S. Capitol on January 6. Hughes was charged with felony civil disorder and other misdemeanors, reported Newsweek.

Upon their entry, the feds reportedly disabled security cameras, disconnected the internet and conducted an extensive search. However, what raised eyebrows was the Twins’ assertions about Liberty Safe. “The feds called the manufacturer of his Liberty Gun Safe and got the passcode to get into it too. All for protesting at the Capitol over 2 1/2 years ago,” they said.

In response to these allegations, Liberty Safe released a statement defending their actions.

“Our company’s protocol is to provide access codes to law enforcement if a warrant grants them access to a property,” the company claimed in a now viral response. “After receiving the request, we received proof of the valid warrant, and only then did we provide them with an access code.”

However, these explanations did not appease the outrage that erupted on social media, and prominent figures joined the chorus of criticism. Rogan O’Handley, a prominent conservative attorney who posts as DC Draino, expressed his concerns on Twitter.

“The irony of LibertySafe giving Feds the pass codes to customer safes is that if they publicly resisted these invasions of privacy, they’d sell more safes than any other company in America by 5x,” Draino said of the company. He also added, “But instead they took the coward’s way out & will now be destroyed by their weakness.”

Pocast host Tim Pool weighed in on the issue during the Wednesday edition of his show, declaring, “If you own a Liberty Safe, you’re compromised.” He further reinforced his stance on Twitter, saying, “I don’t care that liberty safe gave the code to the feds. I care that they had the codes in the first place. Liberty safes are completely worthless.”

Collin Rugg, the co-founder of Trending Politics, offered a scathing assessment, writing that “America’s top gun safe manufacturer, Liberty Safe, gave the FBI an access code to a safe owned by someone who was present at the J6 protest. We have officially found the Bud Light of gun safes. Enjoy going out of business, @libertysafeinc.”

Mike Cernovich raised concerns about Liberty Safe having access to customer lists and backdoor access to safes, rhetorically asking, “Who needs a federal gun registry when you have Liberty Safe?”

Rugg provided an update that informed the company was already reeling from the backlash.

 

Establishment RINOs Shill for Malfunctioning RINO McConnell

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah., joined mainstream media in proclaiming Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., was fit for duty, despite suffering two recent medial incidents that saw him freeze in an apparent brain-lock stupor. 

“We may expect that Mitch McConnell will check out for 20 seconds a day. But the other 86,380 seconds in the day, he does a pretty darn good job,” Romney told reporters. “I’m firmly behind his remaining as our leader.”

Romney wasn’t alone circling the wagon to defend the brain-addled establishment leader, who in addition to his most recent medical malfunction experienced a similar disturbing incident in July.

Both incidents saw McConnell abruptly stop his remarks mid-sentence and stare off into space for several seconds before being assisted in PR recovery by aides. The medical scares were preceded earlier this year by a tumble the 81-year-old senator took that resulted in a concussion and fractured rib.

None of which seemed to matter to RINOs defending their leader’s 86,830 seconds of alleged cognitive capability, when he is able to rubber-stamp swamp initiatives like endless spending for President Joe Biden’s proxy war with Russia.

“He has my full support and the support of the conference,” Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., told ABC News in a RINO herd compilation of quotes the outlet corralled. “He sounds good to me, so, I’m all good with Mitch,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., insisted.

“I feel that he is fully prepared and able to conduct his duties,” echoed alleged Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine.

The senators defense mirrored the opinion of Congressional attending physician Brain Monahan, who issued an all-clear report for McConnell.

“I have consulted with Leader McConnell and conferred with his neurology team,” Monahan said in a statement. “I have informed Leader McConnell that he is medically clear to continue with his schedule as planned.”

Monahan added that “Occasional lightheadedness is not uncommon in concussion recovery and can also be expected as a result of dehydration.”

Senators not on Team RINO, however, have continued to express doubts and concerns about McConnell’s ability to effectively continue in his leadership position.

“I am concerned,” Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told ABC News, expressing overall concern for McConnell’s advanced age relative to criticism leveled at Biden. “If you’re concerned about the president, then you gotta be concerned about other people in leadership. And I just — it’s a two-way street. It’s not one or the other,” Hawley said.

GOP presidential contender Nikki Haley offered a similar assessment following McConnell’s most-recent brain-freeze, calling for the Senate leader to resign his post.

“It’s sad,” Haley told Fox News last week. “No one should feel good about seeing that any more than we should feel good about seeing Dianne Feinstein, any more than we should feel good about a lot of what’s happening or seeing Joe Biden’s decline.”

Haley concluded that, “What I will say is, right now, the Senate is the most privileged nursing home in the country. I mean, Mitch McConnell has done some great things and he deserves credit. But you have to know when to leave.”

Mark Pellin is an editor at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/sabrepaw70.

DOJ to Prosecute Hunter Biden on Gun Charges Before 2024 Election

(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) The Justice Department is moving forward with charges against Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, for alleged gun possession in 2018, according to a recent court filing.

This development follows the plea agreement that some Republicans criticized as a “sweetheart” deal favorable to Hunter. In that deal, which was ultimately scuttled, Hunter avoided jail time by pleading guilty, a decision that raised concerns among conservative circles. The decision to press charges now suggests that the DOJ may be reconsidering the leniency granted in the contentious deal.

The charges came to light in a court filing released by the DOJ on Wednesday. The filing marks the first move made by U.S. District Attorney David Weiss as special counsel. Weiss, who received support from Democrats in his initial appointment as a federal prosecutor, sought special counsel status from Attorney General Merrick Garland.

This request contradicted earlier claims by the Biden administration that Weiss had full independence to pursue charges as he saw fit. This decision has further sparked controversy and raised questions about the DOJ’s autonomy.

Whistleblower testimony from IRS employees who investigated Hunter added to the controversy, alleging that Weiss had encountered obstacles in pursuing more severe charges against the scandal-ridden first son. This revelation cast doubt on the DOJ’s claims of impartiality and prompted investigations by the Republican-led House of Representatives.

While the new charges may indicate the DOJ’s response to bipartisan criticism of Hunter’s alleged actions, some prominent Republicans have criticized the appointment of Weiss as special counsel, citing concerns about his role in the initial plea deal.

As reported by Politico, the timing of these charges is notable, potentially coinciding with Biden’s re-election campaign in 2024. Federal prosecutor Leo Wise, in the court filing, urged the judge to adhere to the Speedy Trial Act, setting a Sept. 29 deadline for the indictment. “The Government intends to seek the return of an indictment in this case before that date,” the court filing stated.

The potential charge also come as Biden faces imminent threats of impeachment from the House, with Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., announcing last week that the House could vote on launching an impeachment inquiry if the president continues to stonewall documents related to an alleged bribery and corruption within the DOJ.

In response to the charges, Hunter’s attorneys continued to assert his innocence and maintain that the previous plea deal remains in effect. However, this deal faced scrutiny when Judge Maryellen Noreika questioned its unusual terms, including conflicting statements about immunity from other charges. Judge Noreika dismissed the tax charges against Hunter, pending new litigation.

Biden Unmasked w/ Shameful Snub of Medal of Honor Hero

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) President Joe Biden came under intense criticism for his equally offensive and potentially dangerous behavior during a ceremony recognizing a Medal of Honor hero.

The masker-in-chief had earlier this week proclaimed he would be wearing a facial covering after multi-vaxxed First Lady Jill Biden tested COVID positive. But during a White House ceremony Tuesday for Medal of Honor recipient Vietnam veteran Captain Larry Taylor, the president for unknown reasons removed his mask while in close proximity to the war hero, who at 81 would by Biden’s own health officials be considered a high risk for COVID infection.

Biden then abruptly left the war hero standing alone on stage, looking bewildered, as he strolled maskless through the crowd. Backlash from veterans, and other social media commentators, were left appalled by Biden’s behavior.

“THIS is the shit I cannot take….Capt. Larry Taylor earned  Medal of Honor – He risked his life by flying his chopper into heavy enemy fire to save four members of a recon team from almost certain death as they were about to be overrun,” wrote a commentator who identified as a retired Green Beret medic, in a message that gained traction when Donald Trump re-posted it on Truth Social. “And for his bravery, courage and sacrifice…he has this shitbag walk off the stage leaving him hanging… Love and Respect, Cap..”

The outrage was shared across social media, lighting up Twitter with fierce condemnations of Biden’s snub. “What a complete insult to that brave soldier. I feel so bad for him. Biden ruined the whole thing for him,” one commentator wrote, adding “It is disgraceful.”

In addition to abandoning a war hero, Biden was sharply criticized for the hypocrisy of touting masks for the public, but strolling maskless through a large crowd. White House mouthpiece Karine Jean-Pierre tried to offer a revisionist interpretation of the snub, claiming the maskless octogenarian’s offensive premature wandering was all part of the script .

“He left as planned, as it was planned, when there was a pause in the program in order to minimize, to minimize his close contact with attendees who were about to participate in a reception,” the insurrectionist spox claimed.

Former White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany called out the overt gaslighting.

“I’ve never seen my former boss do that, President Trump. I’ve never seen President Bush do that. I’ve just not seen a commander-in-chief do that, just walk away, you stand in reverence,” McEnany told Fox News. “Those speculating he wanted to cede the spotlight, I’m sorry, I just don’t buy it.”

Multiple commentators echoed that assessment and ripped the White House’s story.

“He did everything they say you are not supposed to do when you have COVID,” noted one commentator, while others were more succinct in their replies. “LIAR,” replied one comment, and another added, “More spins than a damn tornado.”

Mark Pellin is an editor at Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/sabrepaw70.

Ariz. Court Confirms 2022 Steal, Rules Against State’s ‘Unlawful Signature Matching Process’

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The public interest group Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections announced that it had secured a “massive win” for election integrity after an Arizona court ruled in its favor on Friday.

RITE sued Democrat Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes in March, saying that his office’s Elections Procedures Manual violated the law regarding the mail-in ballot signature verification process, the Western Journal reported.

“While state law requires county recorders to match mail-ballot signatures with signatures in the voter’s ‘registration record,’ the Secretary instructed them to use a broader and less reliable universe of comparison signatures,” RITE said, and outlined how Fontes participated in stealing the 2022 election in the state.

“That means the Secretary was requiring ballots to be counted despite using a signature that did not match anything in the voter’s registration record. This was a clear violation of state law,” RITE said.

Even though Fontes and the group Mi Familia Vota filed a motion to dismiss the case, Yavapai County Superior Court Judge John Napper agreed with RITE’s conclusion concerning the law in a Friday ruling.

The recorder was also required by the court to “review the voter’s registration card” and not other documents with the voter’s signature because the “statute is clear and unambiguous.”

“There is no ambiguity in the statute or process,” Napper said.

It was also revealed that Fontes’s signature-match process in the Elections Procedures Manual unlawfully “contradicts the plain language” of the state law by permitting signature comparison with documents that have “nothing to do with the act of registering.”

“RITE will build on this victory to continue to fight in court for elections that are administered according to democratically enacted laws, not illegal partisan commands. This is a huge victory toward securing the elections that Arizonans deserve, which are elections they can trust,” Derek Lyons, president and CEO of RITE, said.

Arizona MAGA firebrand Kari Lake, who allegedly lost to installed Democrat Gov. Katie Hobbs in a 2022 race marred by machine failures and voter suppression, lauded the RITE court victory.

Headline USA’s Mark Pellin contributed to this report.

EXCLUSIVE: House Edu. Chair Says Groups Like Moms for Liberty Face Daunting Task

(Ben Sellers, Headline USA) Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., the chair of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, said that despite recent victories in the clash against wokeness within the public education system, a daunting road lay ahead for grassroots groups like Moms for Liberty that have risen to combat the encroaching threats of classroom indoctrination and grooming.

Foxx touted the House’s passage in March of the Parents Bill of Rights Act, which currently sits stalled in the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions under chairman Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.

The committee, stacked with firebrand progressives and wishy-washy RINOs, leaves the bill’s fate uncertain for the foreseeable future.

However, in the event that the socialist Sen. Sanders were to bring it to the floor as written, the bill would mandate a newfound level of transparency, requiring that school boards provide clear information on their curricula and materials; budget and revenues; safety concerns; enrollment and transfer options; and a litany of red-flag behaviors related to staff, counselors and contractors.

That, according to Foxx, is when the real work would begin.

“All of this is going to entail tremendous involvement at the local level,” she said during an exclusive interview with Headline USA along with Brooke Weiss, the chair of the Mecklenburg County Moms for Liberty chapter. “… It’s going to be a sustained and focused kind of thing.”

Friends and foes alike could count on Moms for Liberty to “keep showing up because we know we are fighting for the survival of America,” Weiss said in response to Foxx’s call to action.

“You can bet we aren’t going anywhere,” she tweeted following the interview.

“Moms for Liberty is 2½ years old, growing every day, and making major progress in restoring parental rights and improving public education,” she added. “We are successful because our mission is focused on a singular issue (education) & because we are able to mobilize people into real action.”

Although the tendency among some—even conservatives—is to look to the government for solutions to solve the mess that decades of subversive Marxist influence and dark-money coercion have wrought in the school system, Foxx pointed out that this would be counterproductive at best.

“Anytime somebody tells me ‘I want a national something,’ I tell them don’t do it,” she noted in response to a question about a national book-rating system, which Moms for Liberty has endorsed.

“It is the wrong way to go,” Foxx continued. “You put power in the hands of people far away from you—it is the most dangerous thing to do.”

Rather than pivot too far in either direction, though, Foxx, 80—an 18-year congressional veteran who spent time previously in the North Carolina state legislature and as a sociology professor at Appalachian State University—took a more pragmatic outlook.

She signaled that she did not, in principle, oppose the idea of abolishing the federal Department of Education, as some conservatives have called to do.

“If the Lord put me in charge, I’d get rid of everything,” she mused.

Yet, she noted that when former President Ronald Reagan ran on a campaign of doing that very thing, he ultimately wound up strengthening it.

The only solution, as she saw it, was to “devolve the money back to the states” and allow each individual jurisdiction to decide how best to spend its funding.

Even so, that would not entirely addresss one of the biggest concerns facing schools, which is the influence of outside organizations seeking intentionally to politicize the local school agendas and infect them with controversial issues such as critical race theory and transgenderism.

Foxx said she remained mystified by people—including the Democratic House colleagues with whom she is sometimes forced to find common ground—who would oppose common-sense measures like transparency and accountability for schools.

“I don’t know what planet they grew up on,” she said. “… It’s truly amazing to me.”

Nonetheless, it is citizen–watchdogs like Weiss, she said, who have both the power and the responsibility to do what the most powerful government in the world cannot.

Moms for Liberty has only continued to grow in its renown following a national summit in Philadelphia over the summer that featured former President Donald Trump and other luminaries.

While the biggest storyline from the event may have been the Left’s violent and destructive protests outside of it—shortly after the parent group was labeled a “hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center, in collusion with the Biden administration—Weiss said that exposing the true colors of left-wing extremists ultimately left M4L looking all the better.

In June, M4L co-founders Tiffany Justice and Tina Descovich offered Headline USA a defiant statement via email in reaction to the SPLC’s insults.

“Empowering parents continues to be our mission today and that has fueled our organization’s growth—like wildfire to now 45 states in the country,” said the statement.

“Name-calling parents who want to be a part of their child’s education as ‘hate groups’ or ‘bigoted’ just further exposes what this battle is all about: Who fundamentally gets to decide what is taught to our kids in school—parents or government employees?” it continued. “We believe that parental rights do not stop at the classroom door and no amount of hate from groups like this is going to stop that.”

Headline USA reached out to the group for additional reaction to Foxx’s recent remarks asking whether M4L was prepared for the “sustained and focused” fight ahead and will update with any response.

Ben Sellers is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/realbensellers.

Harris Says She’s Ready to Step In For Biden

(Headline USA) Vice President Kamala Harris claimed this week that she is ready to step in and assume the presidency if something were to happen to President Joe Biden.

Harris was asked about voters’ mounting concern over Biden’s age, with one poll showing more than 70% of voters think Biden’s physical and mental capacity is a concern.

“Joe Biden is going to be fine, so that is not going to come to fruition,” Harris told the Associated Press in Jakarta, Indonesia, where she was attending a regional summit. 

She went on to call the situation “hypothetical,” but added: “Let us also understand that every vice president — every vice president — understands that when they take the oath they must be very clear about the responsibility they may have to take over the job of being president. I’m no different.”

Harris then tried to downplay concerns about Biden’s age, claiming he is still as sharp as ever.

“I see him every day,” Harris said. “A substantial amount of time we spend together is in the Oval Office, where I see how his ability to understand issues and weave through complex issues in a way that no one else can to make smart and important decisions on behalf of the American people have played out.”

Harris’s comments come just days after a new tell-all book revealed Biden joked about replacing her when her approval ratings began to tank.

“When the president assembled his COVID team, he would jokingly direct Anthony Fauci to sit in the vice president’s chair,” wrote Franklin Foer in his new book The Last Politician. 

Although Biden’s comments about replacing his vice president were made in jest, some of the president’s top donors have been calling for her removal due to her historic unpopularity and her inability to retain a long-term staff. 

Attorney John Morgan, a prominent Democrat donor, told Politico that many donors want her gone but recognize that Biden has backed himself into a corner.

“When I talk to people, everyone recognizes the problem, but there seems to be no solution,” he said, referring to Harris. “She’s here to stay. If you try to remove her, you’ll face strong opposition from her supporters.”