IG REPORT: Pentagon Reacted Appropriately to Jan. 6 Uprising

'Military personnel are trained to respond to civilian emergency events... by assembling and deploying a force capable of decisive operations...'

(Headline USA) An independent review has concluded that the Defense Department and its top leaders acted appropriately before and during the Jan. 6 uprising at the U.S. Capitol, despite sharp criticism from some local and congressional leaders that the military did not respond quick enough as protesters breached the building.

The Defense Department’s Office of Inspector General, in a report released Wednesday, said military and defense leaders “did not delay or obstruct” the department’s response.

It said decisions made by two officials at the time, acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller and Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy, “were reasonable in light of the circumstances that existed on that day and requests from D.C. officials” and the Capitol Police.

Criticism has centered on the fact that it took about three hours for members of the District of Columbia National Guard to respond to the Capitol—a timeline the Pentagon has defended as appropriate and necessary to determine the mission, equipment and riot preparedness of the citizen-soldiers and get new orders approved and delivered to commanders.

...article continued below
- Advertisement -

The IG report is one of a number of investigations and reviews of the mostly-peaceful, approximately four-hour demonstration to protest the certification of the disputed 2020 election.

The Pentagon inspector general, by law, is an independent authority that conducts audits, evaluations and investigations of Pentagon activities.

The inspector general focused narrowly on the military response to the Jan. 6 protest, while other probes are looking more closely at the roles of then-President Donald Trump and his supporters, including whether they fueled the assault or planned it.

That includes an overtly partisan fishing expedition being waged by House Democrats with two complicit anti-Trump Republicans who were hand-picked by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

...article continued below
- Advertisement -

The so-called Jan. 6 committee recently took the nearly unprecedented step of filing contempt charges against Trump adviser Steve Bannon, who had refused to cooperate under the advice of counsel as Trump’s legal challenges for executive privilege play our in the courts. The committe also has threatened to retaliate against former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows for his refusal to answer a subpoena.

Likewise, nearly 700 political dissidents have been arrested and charged in connection with the uprising. One person was killed as a direct result of the protests—Trump supporter Ashli Babbit, who was ambushed by Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd while entering the House chamber. Byrd—whose name was only released publicly by accident—was cleared of any wrongdoing in a secretive investigation.

The Pentagon inspector general found that the process followed by the military was appropriate, and noted that many of the Guard were not trained in law enforcement. It described a “chaotic and confusing situation” and said initial reports to the Defense Department were contradictory.

The report also said that McCarthy, the Army secretary at the time, was within his authority to require the D.C. Guard to lay out a mission plan before he would authorize their deployment. Others had questioned that decision, saying it delayed the troops’ response.

Maj. Gen. William Walker, commanding general of the D.C. Guard, told senators in March that the chief of the Capitol Police at that time requested military support in a “voice cracking with emotion” in a 1:49 p.m. call as rioters began pushing toward the Capitol. Walker said he immediately relayed the request to the Army but did not learn until after 5 p.m. that the Defense Department had approved it.

The IG report found that defense officials correctly went through the approval process.

“Military personnel are trained to respond to civilian emergency events, not by sending individuals into an uncertain situation as they become available, but by assembling and deploying a force capable of decisive operations,” the report concluded. “Military doctrine requires that commanders first determine essential details, conduct a mission analysis, and then develop a thorough” plan.

The IG made several recommendations. It said the department should develop specific plans for a military response to a civil disturbance within the National Capital Region, including how federal agencies must request support. And it recommended the military train with federal and local agencies on how to better coordinate when large-scale events are planned.

It also recommended that Guard personnel should be given reliable radio and communications equipment.

The report dismissed suggestions that concerns about the optics of sending Guard forces to the Capitol while Congress was in session fueled any delay, saying that McCarthy asked Miller to approve sending troops “within minutes” after his call with Capitol officials. It said such concerns “did not impact” the Pentagon response.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Copyright 2022. No part of this site may be reproduced in whole or in part in any manner without the permission of the copyright owner. To inquire about licensing content, use the contact form at https://headlineusa.com/advertising.
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -