Tuesday, January 31, 2023
- Advertisement -

U.S. House Votes on Bill to Avert Rail Strike

'We were forced to act because the Biden Administration, despite its claims to the contrary, couldn’t get buy-in from its Big Labor allies...'

(The Center Square) The U.S. House of Representatives voted Wednesday on an agreement between rail companies and workers to prevent a strike that could have major economic consequences.

Lawmakers voted 290 to 137 to back a deal between unions and rail companies that includes pay increases. Now, the Senate must consider the issue.

In a separate, more partisan vote, House Democrats and a few Republicans narrowly voted to increase the number of sick days for employees to seven.

The deal came in response to a threatened Dec. 9 strike.

“I’m grateful to Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi and bipartisan House members for acting to prevent a rail shutdown, making clear it would devastate our economy and families everywhere,” President Joe Biden said. “But without more action, supply chain disruptions will begin. The Senate must urgently send a bill to my desk.”

Some Republicans blamed Biden for his role in those negotiations.

“I’m relieved that we are a step closer to preventing a rail strike,” said U.S. Rep. Rick Crawford, R-Ark., ranking member on the House Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials subcommittee.

“We were forced to act because the Biden Administration, despite its claims to the contrary, couldn’t get buy-in from its Big Labor allies to avoid a strike that would cripple large parts of the economy,” he continued. “A rail strike would worsen our continuing supply chain woes, hammering our agriculture industry and giving us empty store shelves. It would also fuel further inflation at a time when American families can least afford it.”

The bill comes after months of negotiations between labor unions and rail companies with President Joe Biden often mediating between the two.

In order to delay the issue until after the midterm elections, Biden claimed to have brokered a deal in September, but four out of the 12 labor unions involved were not willing to back the deal.

A report from the Association of American Railroads said that the shutdown would cost $2 billion per day and “would immediately harm every economic sector served by rail.”

The group said 7,000 trains per day would be affected and would “trigger retail product shortages, widespread manufacturing shutdowns, job losses and disruptions to hundreds of thousands of passenger rail customers.” Rail moves about 28% of U.S. freight.

One union group, the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division-International Brotherhood of Teamsters, praised the deal after its passage Wednesday.

However, the Teamsters maintained that “additional legislation needs to pass so that Railroad Workers will have basic protections against illness, and protection from punishment from the railroads when Workers are most vulnerable,” according to the group’s website.

“This should not be a political issue; this is an issue about protecting our Workers who ensure the nation’s rail infrastructure and supply chain function as best as possible,” it added.

Copyright 2023. No part of this site may be reproduced in whole or in part in any manner without the permission of the copyright owner. To inquire about licensing content, use the contact form at https://headlineusa.com/advertising.
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -