(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The U.S. Army announced on Monday that it would investigate the photographs of men in military garb wearing dog masks and bondage gear.
Some of the photos that surfaced on social media over the past few days exposed the sexual degeneracy that is happening in the U.S. Army that would’ve been unacceptable years before that, according to the Post Millennial. The photos came under intense scrutiny, with many people calling to punish the individuals that appeared in the photos.
“[The Army was] aware of the content found on social media reflecting soldiers’ activities while wearing uniforms,” Army spokesman Maj. Jonathan Lewis said in a statement. “The incident is currently under investigation.”
Internal emails revealed that officials believed that some of the photos were taken at one of the Army bases in Hawaii. The man depicted in one of the photos, @PupRavage, lists Honolulu as his current location on Twitter, backing up those claims.
“He describes himself as a ‘rubber enthusiast,’ ‘bondage expert’ and ‘chastity aficionado,’ noting that he ‘proudly served’ in the Army,” the news outlet reported. “In a prior post, he stated that he had served for ‘nearly three decades.’”
Veteran Kris Cruz criticized @PupRavage and another sexual degenerate @GuyFoxer.
REAL pictures! Is this what you want representing you in war? How can America be taken seriously?@pupravage & @guyfoxer are a disgrace to the uniform they wear.
As a veteran myself I’m disgusted. pic.twitter.com/nSwizlYVKN
— Kris Cruz (@realKrisCruz) December 8, 2022
Other photos that were not revealed on social media show “poses of submission and sexual acts,” the Post Millennial said.
Officers are prohibited from engaging in conduct that “disgraces them personally or brings dishonor to the military profession” under military law.
“The men involved could be found guilty of violating Article 134, which covers ‘conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces,’” the Post Millennial reported. “The photos could also be found to be in violation of Article 133, which covers ‘conduct unbecoming an officer.’”
While @PupRavage has retired he could still face a range of potential punishments, up to being “brought back to active duty to be court-martialed or re-retired at a lower rank.”
