Quantcast

SCOTUS: California Can’t Use COVID to Shut Down Bible Studies

'California treats some comparable secular activities more favorably than at-home religious exercise.'...

(Headline USA) The Supreme Court rejected California’s rules restricting Americans’ first amendment rights to practice religious gatherings in their homes.

The order from the court late Friday is the latest in a recent string of cases in which the high court has barred officials from enforcing some coronavirus-related restrictions applying to religious gatherings.

In many cases, those restrictions have been particularly harsh against churches while allowing business or secular groups more liberty.

Five conservative justices agreed that California restrictions that apply to in-home religious gatherings should be lifted for now, while the court’s liberal justices disagreed.

...article continued below
- Advertisement -

California has announced significant changes loosening restrictions on gatherings that go into effect April 15.

The changes come after infection rates have gone down in the state.

The case before the justices involved California rules that in most of the state limit indoor social gatherings to no more than three households.

Attendees are required to wear masks and physically distance from one another.

...article continued below
- Advertisement -

Different restrictions apply to places including schools, grocery stores and churches.

“California treats some comparable secular activities more favorably than at-home religious exercise,” allowing hair salons, retail stores, and movie theaters, among other places, “to bring together more than three households at a time,” the unsigned order from the court said. A lower court “did not conclude that those activities pose a lesser risk of transmission than applicants’ proposed religious exercise at home,” it said.

The court acknowledged that California’s policy on gatherings will change next week but said the restrictions remain in place until then and that “officials with a track record of ‘moving the goalposts’ retain authority to reinstate those heightened restrictions at any time.”

The case before the justices involved two residents of Santa Clara County in the San Francisco Bay Area, who want to host small, in-person Bible study sessions in their homes.

In an email message Saturday, one of their lawyers, Ryan J. Walsh, said he and his colleagues were “thrilled beyond words” for their clients.

California had defended its policy of restricting social gatherings as “entirely neutral.”

The court has dealt with a string of cases in which religious groups have challenged coronavirus restrictions impacting worship services.

While early in the pandemic the court sided with state officials over the objection of religious groups, that changed following the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg last September and her replacement by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

In November, the high court barred New York from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues in areas with higher infection rates.

And in February, the high court told California that it can’t bar indoor church services, though it let stand for now a ban on singing and chanting indoors.

Adapted from reporting by Associated Press.

Copyright 2022. No part of this site may be reproduced in whole or in part in any manner without the permission of the copyright owner. To inquire about licensing content, use the contact form at https://headlineusa.com/advertising.
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

TRENDING NOW

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -