CIA Whines About Putin’s Resolve to Continue the War in Ukraine

(Headline USA) As the war in Ukraine enters its second year, CIA Director William Burns said Sunday in an interview with CBS’s Face the Nation that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “too confident” in his military’s ability to grind Ukraine into submission.

Burns, in a television interview, said the head of Russia’s intelligence services had displayed in their November meeting “a sense of cockiness and hubris” that reflected Putin’s own beliefs “that he can make time work for him, that he believes he can grind down the Ukrainians that he can wear down our European allies, that political fatigue will eventually set in.”

That conversation, in which Burns warned of the consequences if Russia were to deploy a nuclear weapon in Ukraine, was “pretty dispiriting,” Burns said.

Burns said he judged Putin as “quite determined” to continue prosecuting the war, despite the casualties, tactical shortcomings and economic and reputational damage to Russia.

“I think Putin is, right now, entirely too confident of his ability … to wear down Ukraine,” Burns told CBS’ “Face the Nation” in an interview that aired Sunday.

Burns also said Putin was underestimating U.S. resolve to support Ukraine, saying that it has been his experience that the Russian leader’s view is that Americans have “attention deficit disorder and we’ll move on to some other issue eventually.”

The comments came at a critical juncture for the war as the Biden administration is “confident that the Chinese leadership is considering” whether to provide “lethal” military equipment to Russia.

“It would be a very risky and unwise bet,” Burns said, adding that such a move could only further strain relations between the world’s two largest economics. “That’s why I hope very much that they don’t.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

CIA Chief Delivers Mixed Messages Regarding Possible Taiwan Invasion

(Headline USA) U.S. intelligence shows that China‘s President Xi Jinping has instructed his country’s military to “be ready by 2027″ to invade Taiwan, CIA Director William Burns said.

Nonetheless, the foreign intelligence agency remained noncommital about what the Asian superpower’s plans might be, and whether anything would occur during President Joe Biden’s term in office.

Burns, in a television interview that aired Sunday, stressed that the United States must take “very seriously” Xi’s desire to ultimately control Taiwan even if military conflict is not inevitable.

“We do know, as has been made public, that President Xi has instructed the PLA, the Chinese military leadership, to be ready by 2027 to invade Taiwan, but that doesn’t mean that he’s decided to invade in 2027 or any other year as well,” Burns told CBS’s Face the Nation.

Taiwan and China split in 1949 after a civil war that ended with the Communist Party in control of the mainland. The self-governing island acts like a sovereign nation yet is not recognized by the United Nations or any major country.

In 1979, President Jimmy Carter formally recognized the government in Beijing and cut nation-to-nation ties with Taiwan. In response, Congress passed the Taiwan Relations Act, creating a benchmark for a continuing relationship.

Taiwan has received numerous displays of official American support for the island democracy in the face of growing shows of force by Beijing, which claims Taiwan as part of its territory.

President Joe Biden has said that American forces would defend Taiwan if China tries to invade. The White House says U.S. policy has not changed in making clear that Washington wants to see Taiwan’s status resolved peacefully. It is silent as to whether U.S. forces might be sent in response to a Chinese attack.

In Sunday’s interview, Burns said the support from the U.S. and European allies for Ukraine following Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of that country may be acting as a potential deterrent to Chinese officials for now but said the risks of a possible attack on Taiwan will only grow stronger.

“I think the risks of, you know, a potential use of force probably grow the further into this decade you get and beyond it, into the following decade as well,” he said. “So that’s something obviously, that we watch very, very carefully.”

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Boy, 11, Reads Graphic Groomer Content from School Library at Board Meeting

(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) An 11-year-old boy read a pornographic book he personally checked out from his school’s library to his school board to demonstrate the perversion that librarians made available to himself and his peers.

Knox Zajac, an 11-year-old sixth grade student at Windham Middle School in Maine read a page of the book Nick and Charlie to his schoolboard, according to BizPac Review.

“I’m a sixth grader. I was in the library, and this book was on the stand,” he began.

“When I rented it out to show my dad it, the library asked if I wanted more and if I wanted a graphic novel version.”

What sort of a graphic novel was offered to young Knox? He read a page to the school board to show what the library offered him.

“My back over my hips, as I ask if we should take our clothes off,” the boy read. “And he’s saying yes before I finish my sentence.”

“He’s pulling off my t-shirt, laughing when I can’t undo his shirt buttons. He’s undoing my belt.”

Unfortunately, the book gets even more graphic.

“I’m reaching into his bedside drawer for a condom. We’re kissing,” Zajack read.

“Again we’re rolling over. Obviously, you can see where this is going. I don’t know if it’s because we’re feeling especially emotional or tired, or the past couple of weeks has much too much, but this reminds me so much of the first time we had sex.”

“We were both f–king terrified, and the whole thing was kind of terrible since we didn’t know what we were doing.”

The school board was unmoved.

Zajack’s father, Adam Zajack, however, was motivated.

“We do not need to be having literature that’s showing boys how to suck d–k,” he said.

Woody Harrelson Slams Big Pharma as ‘Biggest Drug Cartel in the World’

(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) Woody Harrelson slammed Big Pharma, the mainstream media, and American politicians in his opening monologue on Saturday Night Live, as he continued to point out the absurdity of COVID Lockdowns.

The red-pilled former Cheer star, in a way that only a comedian can, highlighted the absurdity of the COVID-19 lockdowns.

He set the scene. Harrelson described a Sunday morning in New York after performing on Saturday Night Live. He describes leaning on the trunk of a tree, high on marijuana, and reading a movie script.

Harrelson began the hypothetical film by describing the domination of America’s media and politicians by cosmopolitan oligarchs.

“So, the movie goes like this: the biggest drug cartels in the world get together, and buy up all the media, and all the politicians,” he said.

On cue, the mainstream media all attacked Harrelson, as noted by conservative blogger Kanekoa the Great.

He reported that Rolling Stone, Variety, Daily Beast, and HufffPoost all ran hit pieces attacking Harrelson’s monologue on Sunday morning. USA Today, Yahoo!, and Vanity Fair also heaped on. Nothing to see here.

Harrelson described the action of this cabal.

“[They] force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes, and people can only come out if they take the cartel’s drugs, and keep taking them over and over,” Harrelson explained.

“I threw the script away,” he said. “I mean, who is going to believe that crazy idea.”

Harrelson’s apparent criticism of the 2020-2021 lockdowns follows his previously established apprehension of both Big Pharma and Big Government established in his sit down with Bill Maher on Maher’s podcast Club Random.

Harrelson explained some of his complaints about Big Pharma, the media, and the government’s collective attack on alternative medicine.

“Ivermectin got made into a horse tranquilizer,” he said.

Maher pointed out that, of course, Ivermectin was used for horses, but millions of people had also used the drug.

“Hydroxychloroquine got made ridiculous,” Harrelson continued.

Ultimately, he argues, the cabal produced only one treatment for COVID.

“There was only one thing that could work, and that’s the vaccine, and ultimately, because of that, billions of dollars were made,” he said.

“I just, I don’t like profiteering in war,” he said.

“Think of the billions of dollars that have gone to Big Pharma.”

Harrelson went on to explain his hesitations about big government and Big Pharma in general.

“The last people I would trust with my health are Big Pharma and Big Government because neither one of those strike me as caring entities,” he said.

Harrelson’s point about the lack of care for the American people is supported by previous reporting. The National Bureau of Economic Studies suggested that the lockdowns killed more people than they saved.

The study estimated that “171,000 excess non-COVID deaths through the end of 2021,” resulted from the lockdowns. The study found that diabetes, obesity, drug induced-causes of death, and alcohol-related deaths rose somewhere between 12,000 and 15,000 above the national average.

The lockdowns were also devastating to children’s health and the education of America’s future citizens.

“They’re all about profit, and it’s insane the profit they’ve made,” Harrelson said.

Pro-Abortion Groups Will Partner With Largest Private Law Firms

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Six pro-abortion groups decided to partner with public officials and some of the largest law firms to launch the Abortion Defense Network, a program that connects mothers who want to murder their babies or the butchers they seek and provides those people with legal advice, representation and resources.

According to the Daily Caller, the program that is managed by the Lawyering Project is a joint partnership between the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), If/When/How: Lawyering for Reproductive Justice, National Women’s Law Center (NWLC) and Resources for Abortion Delivery (RAD), along with some private law firms and public agencies that are “committed to safeguarding abortion.”

“Anyone in the U.S. working to provide or support abortion care can seek legal assistance from the Abortion Defense Network,” the NWLC news release stated. “People will be matched with values-aligned attorneys and be provided with information and resources to not only understand their rights but fight back against unjust proceedings meant to harass and intimidate them.”

Alexandra Snyder, CEO of the Life Legal Defense Foundation, said that many of these firms have been protecting baby murderers for decades.

“Pro-aborts have assembled a cadre of white-shoe legal defense firms to relieve them of their responsibilities under the law,” Snyder said.

“Many of the firms in the newly created ‘Abortion Defense Network’ have been shielding Planned Parenthood and other abortionists from liability for criminal activity, including selling the body parts of aborted babies, for decades. Their lawyers charge upwards of a thousand dollars an hour to ensure that abortionists can continue unabated in their murderous profession.”

Snyder also pointed out that, unlike pro-murder activists, it is pro-lifers who actually need to be protected, citing several cases where “abortion workers have threatened, harassed, and physically assaulted pro-lifers.”

“For example, in one case, an abortion ‘escort’ drove her vehicle into an elderly man who tried to stop her from speeding, blaring her horn, and driving erratically around a peaceful prayer vigil,” she said.

“In another case, a pro-abort savagely attacked a pro-lifer on a public sidewalk, pushing him to the ground and mercilessly kicking him… In each of these cases, officials tasked with protecting the public failed to hold the assailants accountable.”

“After attempting to work with prosecutors to seek justice for victims of assault, battery and other grievous crimes, we sought recourse in civil courts,” Snyder continued.

“Instead of acknowledging that violence in and outside abortion clinics is unacceptable, pro-aborts decided to organize a legal defense team so they can use the legal system to justify continued aggression toward those who seek to protect human life.”

Project Veritas Wants James O’Keefe Back after Donors, Followers Flee

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) Project Veritas released a video, in which the organization said they want James O’Keefe back after they lost hundreds of thousands of followers and donors, whom they begged to not abandon them.

The video came on the same day when a dozen Project Veritas whistleblowers published a video where they defended O’Keefe, according to the Gateway Pundit.

“We, the staff at Project Veritas, are at a crossroads. High-level disputes between our leader and founder, James O’Keefe, and the volunteer Board of Directors who are responsible for oversight of the nonprofit have resulted in James no longer being here,” the video stated.

“James is not only the founder of Project Veritas but the creative visionary of our mission. This devastated us and the audience we exist for. James hasn’t resigned, nor was he fired. These events confuse, and they hurt us — leaving all of us in a state of limbo.”

“So, we have a choice to make. We want James back, but we have a duty to our generous supporters, to all of you, and to our journalistic integrity to break record stories which impact our culture, and most importantly, the future of our country,” the video added.

“We don’t blame anyone for assuming the worst or thinking we’ve been co-opted by some outside force. But this fact still stands: no board or donor ever tells us what to report, and they never will.”

The video, then, ended with Project Veritas saying that the organization doesn’t want to see itself without O’Keefe.

“We will never replace James O’Keefe. But for now, we see it as our job to hold the torch for him while keeping the door wide open for his return. We will keep the spirit of James’ mission alive for as long as we are able,” the video said.

“”Until then, we will keep this mission going for our country, for the truth and for James. We know the world is watching and that some are hoping that we fail. We need you to know that as the Project Veritas team, we don’t want to see a Project Veritas without James O’Keefe,” it concluded.

UNC Bans ‘Diversity’ Hiring amid Anti-Woke Backlash

(Dmytro “Henry” Aleksandrov, Headline USA) The University of North Carolina (UNC) decided to fight against the woke virus by voting to ban diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) statements and politically preferential hiring on Thursday.

“[UNC] shall neither solicit nor require an employee or applicant for academic admission or employment to affirmatively ascribe to or opine about beliefs, affiliations, ideals, or principles regarding matters of contemporary political debate or social action as a condition to admission, employment, or professional advancement,” the board resolution stated, according to Fox News. The university also said that an employee or applicant also can’t “be solicited or required to describe his or her actions in support of, or in opposition to, such beliefs, affiliations, ideals, or principles.”

“Practices prohibited here include but are not limited to solicitations or requirements for statements of commitment to particular views on matters of contemporary political debate or social action contained on applications or qualifications for admission or employment included as criteria for analysis of an employee’s career progression,” UNC said.

Kenny Xu, President of Color Us United, which fights for a race-blind society said that he believes UNC’s decision will have a positive effect on other colleges and campuses all across the country.

“We believe in a race-blind, meritocratic society with high standards and that’s what has traditionally produced excellence in the United States,” Xu said. “When we saw wokeness and DEI infiltrating the medical profession, that’s when we became concerned because medicine is the one place where everybody knows — liberals, conservatives, independents — that you need the most qualified doctor to get the best outcome.”

“When diversity, equity and inclusion says ‘No, you need doctors of a certain race’ or ‘No, we need to be teaching things from the lens of social justice rather than the biological practice of medicine,’ that’s when we got concerned,” Xu added.

City of Seattle Agrees to Pay Millions in a Lawsuit Over CHAZ

(Ezekiel Loseke, Headline USA) The city of Seattle has agreed to pay millions to business owners and citizens who are suing over the city’s 2020 handling of the autonomous zone protests, originally dubbed the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ or CHOP), according to Fox News.

Specifically, the citizens are to be “compensated for the City’s mishandling of CHOP that resulted in a significant increase in crime and even loss of life,” attorney Angelo Calfo said in a statement.

The now-settled lawsuit asserted that Seattle “effectively authorized the actions of the CHOP participants,” according to the text of the suit.

The settlement includes a payment of $3.65 million.

In June of 2020, protestors swarmed over the area, took the police department’s precinct, and stopped police officers from enforcing the law in that particular area of Seattle.

The ‘protest’ was in response to the death of George Floyd, who died of an overdose after resisting arrest.

The seized area, the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, was covered incessantly by the media as violent crime surged within the site. Several fatal shootings occurred, including the murder of a 16-year-old boy.

Demands from the autonomous zone included slashing the budget of the police by 50%, releasing people in jail for crimes involving marijuana, and ending imprisonment.

The consequence of this zone was disastrous for the people of Seattle.

In 2019, before the autonomous zone, there were 31 homicides in Seattle. In 2020, that number increased by 61%, totaling 50 homicides. 2020, not incidentally, saw the highest number of murders in 26 years.

The citizens and businesses that filed the lawsuit wanted to hold the city accountable for the death and destruction that the city enabled by its tolerance of CHAZ.

The lawsuit uncovered the fact that local politicians and high-ranking police officers had deleted thousands of text messages related to CHAZ.

The City Attorney Anne Davison expressed relief to be done with the lawsuit.

She reported being “pleased that we were able to resolve this matter and turn a page from a difficult period in the city’s history.”

GOP Rep. Jordan of Ohio Dies Suddenly at Age 46

(Ben Sellers, Headline USA) State Rep. Kris Jordan, a staunch conservative and well-known fixture in the Ohio legislature, died suddenly and unexpectedly Saturday at the age of 46.

“Fran and I are shocked and saddened to learn of the death of Representative Kris Jordan,” said Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine in a statement, according to the Columbus Dispatch.

The paper reported only that he died of “natural causes.”

DeWine ordered that flags at the Ohio statehouse and throughout Jordan’s district—in Delaware County, just north of Columbus—be flown at half-staff until sunset on the day of Jordan’s yet-to-be-announced funeral.

“We extend our sincerest condolences to his entire family for this most unexpected loss,” he added. “Kris will be remembered for his expertise as a legislator and his advocacy for the people of Delaware County.”

Apart from sharing a state, surname and political affiliation with one of Ohio’s most prominent politicians, 59-year-old U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan, the current chair of the House Judiciary Committee, the two also both cast an aura of higher purpose, as if destined for greater things while projecting a sort of unmatched youthful vigor.

Kris Jordan entered into politics as a county commissioner at the age of only 25 and had first been elected as a state lawmaker in 2008, in his early 30s. There, he quickly became a public face of the Ohio GOP, delivering key messaging following the resignation of the state budget commissioner in 2010.

The father of three was widely praised as a man of upright morals and family values, as well as a deft and promising stateman.

“His death is a great loss to our county’s Republican Party, the Ohio Statehouse and the conservative movement,” said state Sen. Andrew Brenner on Facebook, paying tribute to his friend of three decades.

“His governance has been a constant during Delaware County’s growth over the past two decades and we have much to celebrate because of his service,” said former state Rep. Rick Carfagna.

Although Jordan’s loss is not believed to be connected with the toxic spill in Palestine, Ohio, which lies roughly 100 miles west of his district, his passing caps off a particularly challenging month for the Buckeye State.

The train derailment in Palestine occurred on Feb. 3, and on Feb. 20, a metal plant outside Cleveland exploded, killing one and injuring 13.

The former swing state, which helped elect former President Barack Obama twice, has been widely ignored by the Biden administration, with President Joe Biden deflecting a question on whether he planned to visit Palestine by changing the subject to an Aretha Franklin song on Friday.

Ben Sellers is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at twitter.com/realbensellers.

Dilbert Canceled Over Author’s Comments Against Anti-White Racism

(Headline USA) The creator of the Dilbert comic strip faced a backlash of cancellations by the mainstream media Saturday while defending his remarks denouncing anti-white racism which were construed as being racist against black people.

Various media publishers across the U.S. denounced the comments by Dilbert creator Scott Adams while saying they would no longer provide a platform for his work.

Andrews McMeel Syndication, which distributes Dilbert, did not immediately respond Saturday to requests for comment.

Adams defended himself on social media against those whom he said “hate me and are canceling me.”

Dilbert is a long-running comic that pokes fun at office-place culture.

The backlash began following an episode this past week of the YouTube show, “Real Coffee with Scott Adams.” Among other topics, Adams referenced a Rasmussen Reports survey that had asked whether people agreed with the statement “It’s OK to be white.”

Most agreed, but Adams noted that 26% of Black respondents disagreed and others weren’t sure.

Adams, who is white, repeatedly referred to those black people as members of a “hate group” or a “racist hate group.”

“Based on the current way things are going, the best advice I would give to white people is to get the hell away from black people,” Adams said on his Wednesday show.

In another episode of his online show Saturday, Adams said he had been making a point that “everyone should be treated as an individual” without discrimination.

“But you should also avoid any group that doesn’t respect you, even if there are people within the group who are fine,” Adams said.

The Los Angeles Times cited Adams’ “racist comments” while announcing Saturday that Dilbert will be discontinued Monday in most editions and that its final run in the Sunday comics — which are printed in advance — will be March 12.

The San Antonio Express-News, which is part of Hearst Newspapers, said Saturday that it will drop the Dilbert comic strip, effective Monday, “because of hateful and discriminatory public comments by its creator.”

The USA Today Network tweeted Friday that it also will stop publishing Dilbert “due to recent discriminatory comments by its creator.”

The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and other publications that are part of Advance Local media also announced that they are dropping Dilbert.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press