(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) In a bold and controversial move, a group of far-left professors released an open letter urging the Biden administration to adopt a radical strategy dubbed “Popular Constitutionalism” as a scheme to counter the influence of what they refer to as “MAGA justices” on the Supreme Court.
The letter, signed by Harvard law professor Mark Tushnet and San Francisco State University political scientist Aaron Belkin, proposes a radical approach to handle rulings that go against the far-left policies of the Biden administration.
Effectively calling on President Joe Biden to challenge the court’s authority, the professors begin, “We urge President Biden to restrain MAGA justices immediately by announcing that if and when they issue rulings that are based on gravely mistaken interpretations of the Constitution that undermine our most fundamental commitments, the Administration will be guided by its own constitutional interpretations.”
The professors argue that the court’s conservative majority, attributed to former President Donald Trump’s appointment of three justices, poses an extreme threat to democracy and fundamental rights. In their view, this necessitates swift action to curtail the influence of what they term “MAGA justices.”
“The central tenet of the solution that we recommend—Popular Constitutionalism—is that courts do not exercise exclusive authority over constitutional meaning. In practice, a President who disagrees with a court’s interpretation of the Constitution should offer and then follow an alternative interpretation,” the letter emphasizes.
The letter further calls for immediate actions to limit the influence of conservative justices, claiming that the threat they pose to democracy and fundamental rights demands swift measures.
However, critics argue that such a strategy could have serious implications for the independence and integrity of the judicial branch.
Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor and legal expert, rebuked the letter in a fiery opinion article in the Hill.
“What is most striking about these professors is how they continue to claim they are defenders of democracy, yet seek to use unilateral executive authority to defy the courts and, in cases like the tuition forgiveness and affirmative action, the majority of the public,” Turley wrote. “They remain the privileged elite of academia, declaring their values as transcending both constitutional and democratic processes.”
The American Communities Project cataloged the voting patterns of 171 “college towns,” where major colleges or universities are located and account for much of their economic activity, the Daily Caller reported. It was revealed that the towns have seen a dramatic increase in support of Democrats since the 2000 presidential election, with over two-thirds now being expressly Democratic.
Thirty-eight towns flipped from being predominantly Republican to Democratic, while 79 left-leaning towns started to support Democrats even more, in terms of average vote shares during elections. By contrast, only 47 right-leaning towns became more Republican and just six college towns flipped their political ideology.
In the 2000 election, 48% of all college towns in the country voted for Democratic Vice President Al Gore. In 2020, that number had increased to 54% for Joe Biden.
In addition to that, among the college towns and counties where support had shifted, several were in prominent “swing states” where presidential elections are often decided, among which is Dane County, where the University of Wisconsin—Madison is located, and where the Democratic margin of victory in the recent state Supreme Court election was higher than any other county.
In Washtenaw County, the home of the University of Michigan, voters chose Biden over Donald Trump in the 2020 election by a margin of over 50%, which is approximately 101,000 votes. If Hillary Clinton obtained such a margin in 2016, she would have won the state of Michigan, which Trump won that year.
In Larimer County, the location of Colorado State University, the Democratic margin of victory in 2020 increased by 169,000 votes over the 2000 election, while the Republican margin increased only by 21,000 votes.
“This is a really big deal,” Mark Graul, a former campaign manager for President George W. Bush in Wisconsin in 2004, said. “[The shift is] truly making it impossible for Republicans to win a statewide race.”
The overall nationwide gap between both parties among college-educated voters in 2020 was over 1 million votes, in favor of Democrats.
Yaccarino’s new features will allow advertisers to decide what kinds of content their ads appear next to, the New York Postreported.
The new features will allow advertisers to sift through content to select what they find suitable for advertisement, the news source added. Before Yaccarino’s appointment to Twitter, none of the newly introduced features were in production.
Yaccarino will present the features to advertising holding companies, like WPP, Omnicom, Publicis Groupe, Interpublic and Dentsu.
“More than 99% of content users and advertisers see on Twitter is healthy. Which means only a small amount of content requires enforcement. But no matter the amount, we will keep doing whatever it takes to make this platform as safe and healthy as possible,” Yaccarino wrote on Wednesday.
“Over the past 8 months, we’ve made progress on reducing the spread of hate speech, proactively preventing child exploitation and giving brands more control over where their ads appear. Each step of the way, Twitter has been more transparent about this work than other platforms, and groups outside of Twitter have validated our impact.”
She then continued by detailing Twitter’s expansion of its “Freedom of Speech Not Reach” policy and saying that Twitter has seen “exceptional results.”
“In the next two weeks, we’re further expanding our ad placement controls to better support the tremendous growth of video consumption on the platform. We’re actively building pre-bid inventory filtering that will allow even more control over content adjacencies. Every other platform will tell you the work is never done,” she wrote.
“Twitter’s progress is real, we’ve been transparent about it, and we’re proud of it. And we just wanted you to know the facts.”
(Casey Harper, The Center Square) – Leaders of major metros around the U.S. have pushed for more progressive immigration policies in recent years by declaring themselves safe havens for illegal immigrants. Now, however, as the realities of the financial and social impacts of those policies sink in, some local leaders are thinking twice.
Millions of illegal immigrants have flowed across the southern border since President Joe Biden took office, with many seeking haven in self-proclaimed “sanctuary cities.”
“The policies of the Biden administration have certainly upped the ante on this sort of virtue signaling in recent years,” Ira Mehlman from the Federation for American Immigration Reform told The Center Square, referring to sanctuary cities. “Some 2.3 million new illegal aliens have entered the country since Biden took office, and a lot of them have wound up in these sanctuary jurisdictions, either on their own, transported by the federal government, or transported by other jurisdictions that simply cannot handle the influx.”
The Center for Immigration Studies recently published a map of sanctuary states, cities and counties. Yellow squares represent counties, red represents cities and green represents states.
Map of sanctuary governments for illegal migrants around the U.S. (Courtesy: Center for Immigration Studies)
Cities like New York and Chicago have dismissed concerns from border states in recent years, but now they are raising the alarm that they cannot handle the flood of migrants.
New York City Mayor Eric Adams publicly said last week the city cannot handle any more migrants. He told reporters that the city plans to pass out flyers at the southern border to discourage illegal immigrants from traveling to NYC.
As The Center Square previously reported, the Chicago City Council and Mayor Brandon Johnson heard from Chicago residents who voiced concerns about the increase in migrants and the taxpayer funds being spent to support them.
“What people are feeling is that the people who have been in these neighborhoods for generations, they have been treated inhumanely by the same government that is making efforts to provide good care to the asylum seekers,” state Rep. La Shawn Ford, D-Chicago, told The Center Square.
In 2020, Illinois taxpayers began to subsidize the cost of undocumented immigrant health care for those over the age of 65. In 2022, the state budget included subsidizing coverage for those over the age of 42. As part of the state’s fiscal year 2024 budget that began July 1, Gov. J.B. Pritzker modified the program to cover those only over 65 for a total budgeted amount of $550 million. The program was scaled way back because costs were ballooning to more than $1 billion.
Nearly 100,000 migrants have come to New York City this year, but that figure doesn’t compare to the total coming through at the southern border every month.
Recent U.S. Customs and Border Protection data shows that over 175,000 illegal immigrants came into the U.S. last month alone, and that figure is much lower than the monthly numbers from earlier this year. Experts say the figure is probably much higher, but fewer agents are available to track how many migrants are entering the U.S. between ports of entry.
In the first five months of this year, the total number of illegal immigrants coming into the U.S. via the southern border was more than the population of eight U.S. states.
Democratic mayors also pushed back when Texas Gov. Greg Abbot and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, whose states bear the brunt of illegal migration more than most others, started transporting migrants to other cities around the country.
Texas sees hundreds of thousands of illegal border crossers regularly but faced backlash for busing a few thousand migrants to self-proclaimed sanctuary cities like Denver, Chicago, New York City and Washington, D.C. over several months.
“What none of us need is more political theater and partisan gamesmanship pitting jurisdictions against each other and exacerbating this situation instead of advocating for real solutions to this challenge,” Denver Mayor Michael Hancock said in May. “If Gov. Abbott thinks he’s going to win over allies to his cause here in Denver with this latest stunt, he’s going to be sorely mistaken. And we’re more than happy to send him the bill for any additional support we have to provide now because of his failure at managing his own state.”
Abbott sent a few thousand migrants to Washington, D.C., also a sanctuary city, last year, prompting Mayor Muriel Bowser to declare a public health emergency.
“Our ability to assist people in need at this scale is very limited,” Bowser said at the time.
Bowser lamented that the city’s homeless shelters were filling up with illegal immigrants and pushed to have the migrants end up at other final destinations.
Abbott shot back:
“D.C. is experiencing a fraction of the disastrous impact the border crisis has caused Texas,” Abbot said. “Mayor Bowser should stop attacking Texas for securing the border [and] demand Joe Biden do his job.”
Local law enforcement have felt the burden of the surge of migrants, some of whom have prior criminal records.
“The plain truth is that sanctuary city policies hobble law enforcement’s ability to protect the public from dangerous criminals,” Jason Johnson, president of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund, told The Center Square. “Unlike American-born offenders, authorities almost never know the true criminal histories of illegal alien offenders who previously committed crimes abroad because their home countries don’t have or don’t provide their records to American law enforcement.”
Johnson argued crime from some illegal immigrants has pushed local leaders to regret inviting the influx.
“Now, these politicians are abandoning the virtues they were so proud to signal before they realized the disaster these policies wrought,” Johnson said.
Ken Oliver, an immigration expert at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, echoed that sentiment, pointing to the financial burden on local cities that the influx of migrants creates.
“As the taxpaying citizens of sanctuary cities become increasingly aware of the costs of sanctuary policies, including the benefits of housing, food and protection from the consequences of lawbreaking that are extended to inadmissible aliens but not to them, what we’re seeing is a backlash that is growing and well justified,” Oliver told The Center Square. “That backlash and the budgetary realities facing cities and states at the receiving end of the Biden border crisis are driving a new and welcome trend. It is fitting that the unwinding of unsustainable sanctuary policies is beginning in America’s leading sanctuary enclave of New York City.”
Oliver argued the trend will continue to grow.
“That pressure to unwind sanctuary policies is not only going to continue to build throughout the country, but should also trickle up in the months and years ahead to spur the reversal of the federal policies that created the crisis in the first place,” he said.
(J.J. Brannock, The Center Square) Members of the Navajo Nation in southeastern U.S. say the federal government is leaving their people behind with its energy policies, crippling their economy and leaving more people in poverty.
Republicans on the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources are attempting to overturn such Biden administration policies, including the Department of Interior’s land withdrawal and ban on oil and gas leasing outside of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico, where members of the Navajo tribe reside.
The DOI issued a Public Land Order in June imposing a 10-mile buffer zone around Chaco Culture National Historical Park for the next 20 years. The prevention of oil and natural gas leasing within the zone would cause Navajo mineral owners to lose an estimated $194.3 million in revenue over the next 20 years.
More than 5,000 Navajo mineral owners rely on income from energy development. The individuals are called Navajo allottees, as the minerals they own were allotted to their ancestors many years ago.
Delora Hesuse, a Nageezi Chapter Navajo who lives within the 10-mile buffer, said in a hearing last week that “this is hugely important because our area is very poor and families still do not have electricity or running water. Our elderly rely on this money to feed their children and livestock.”
Committee Republicans said the land order also would further harm domestic energy efforts.
“The Department of Interior’s decision […] represents Mr. Biden’s latest effort to impose his radical agenda by locking up our nation’s land and water while further crippling domestic energy production and pushing the United States into greater dependence on foreign sources for energy,” Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Chairman Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., said in the hearing.
U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said that the Navajo were placed in an “economic hostage situation,” with the tribe believing that continuing to mine oil and gas is the only source of possible income.
“The answer to that, in my view, is not to revert back to that [oil and gas mining],” Ocasio-Cortez said, “but to invest and reinvest in these communities, particularly where there is harm being done.”
She asked if there were other steps the federal government could take to better support the Navajo people through an energy transition.
Buu Nygren, president of the Navajo Nation, responded that such a discussion should have happened before the decision to restrict oil and gas leasing within the buffer zone was made.
“I did not even know about the announcement or anything from the secretary,” Nygren said, “but my hope was that we were going to have these discussions to come up with a collective solution.”
Western Energy Alliance, a group that represents 200 companies centered on exploration and production of oil and natural gas in the West, said the Biden administration’s policies, with no plan to address the obvious fallout, will lead to more poverty among the Navajo tribe.
Aaron Johnson, vice president of Public and Legislative Affairs for the alliance, said, “Rep. Ocasio-Cortez assumes an energy transition for the Navajo Nation that doesn’t exist. As President Buu Nygren said, such a transition isn’t happening now nor will it in the foreseeable future. The Interior Secretary’s ten-mile buffer around Chaco Canyon will lead to more poverty in a disadvantaged community by denying nearly $200 million in oil and natural gas revenue for Navajo members. Meanwhile, tribal wind and solar royalties are nonexistent.”
“According to Interior’s own data, under the Biden Administration tribal oil production is down 21% and natural gas is down 11%,” Johnson continued. “They’re working to reduce sustained energy income to tribes into the future by choking new permits back 60%. Congress should reverse Interior’s withdrawal and allow Navajos to earn an income and support their families by developing their energy resources.”
Nygren also spoke on one of the tribe’s biggest and cleanest coal plants, the Navajo Generating Station in Arizona, being decommissioned in December 2019.
“The promise was solar fields down the road,” Nygren said, “but now nothing exists. People are out of jobs. There’s no royalties, no taxes, so I truly agree with having a transition plan that’s equitable and that plan was never presented to me, it was just a decision that was made.”
Nygren said the lack of compromise and communication from the federal government led to the opposition to the DOI’s land order.
“The withdrawal was done without meaningful consultation and fails to honor the Navajo Nation sovereignty,” he said. “Respect for tribal sovereignty must be consistent, even when it is not convenient. The nation offered a compromise that honored Navajo sovereignty and the rights of our allottees, but that was rejected with inadequate explanation from the administration.”
The tribe had previously offered a five-mile buffer zone compromise that helped protect the park and enable Navajo mineral owners to develop most of their resources but revoked it after DOI Secretary Deb Haaland failed to conduct “sufficient tribal consultation.”
“I feel like as the Navajo Nation president I’m the one that has to figure out that solution,” Nygren said about the recent federal actions. “I feel like I’ve inherited the issue and the only way to get it done is through Congress or the secretary, but in the meantime it’s a problem of the Navajo Nation president and the Navajo Nation council.”
In response to the DOI’s order, the Congressional Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources discharged the Energy Opportunities for All Act last week, which would nullify the Interior Department’s decision. The discharge essentially means that the bill is now ready to begin floor proceedings.
“The House Committee on Natural Resources is keeping our commitment to the American people by working to lower energy costs and support tribal rights by promoting access to our nations natural resources,” Committee Chairman Bruce Westerman, R-Ark., said in a statement.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., has not yet announced an official floor time for consideration of the bill.
(Headline USA) A Southern California school board has voted to approve a social studies curriculum for elementary students, resolving a dispute with Gov. Gavin Newsom over lesson plans that instruct elementary students about homosexuality and gender bending after Newsom threatened them with a hefty fine.
Rejecting the grooming curriculum meant the district would have to use a textbook published in 2006. Those textbooks do not comply with a 2011 state law that requires schools to teach students about the historical contributions of gay, bisexual and gender-bending Americans.
Newsom threatened to fine the district $1.5 million if it didn’t approve the curriculum.
The board approved the curriculum during a special meeting late Friday night.
They also instructed the district’s interim superintendent to review a portion of the curriculum that includes a discussion of gay rights and how same-sex marriage came to be legal in California.
The board recommended “substituting age appropriate curriculum” that complies with state and federal law but “is also consistent with the board’s commitment to exclude sexualized topics of instruction from elementary school grade levels.”
Board President Joseph Komrosky explained the role of a lawsuit in the board’s reasoning.
“If we do not provide [this] curriculum — I want everybody to hear this — we will literally be sued.”
Newsom said Friday’s vote ensures “students will receive the basic materials needed to learn.”
Textbooks have become a flashpoint in U.S. politics as conservative Americans fight against the indoctrination of their children.
Kimberly Velez, the district’s interim superintendent, assured board members that staff would order the new curriculum on Monday and it would arrive in time for the start of school next month.
(Headline USA) In the national temper tantrum that followed the 2020 overdose death of George Floyd, about 2,000 protesters took to the streets in a St. Louis suburb and screeched demands that Francis Howell School District adopt radical left-wing racialist policies.
The school board responded with a resolution using the language of CRT.
Now the board, led by new conservative board members elected since last year, has revoked that woke resolution and copies of it will be removed from school buildings.
The board’s decision follows a national awakening of the conservative silent majority that began with backlash against the tyranny enacted on behalf of the COVID-19 ‘emergency.’
School board elections have been an epicenter for this awakening. Citizens have elected candidates promising to remove CRT and gender propaganda from schools, remove pornographic books and to ban boys from competing in girls sports.
The Francis Howell district is among Missouri’s largest, with 17,000 students, about 87% of whom are white. The vote rescinded the woke resolution 75 days after “a majority of current Board of Education members were not signatories to the resolution or did not otherwise vote to adopt the resolution.”
The board’s vice president, Randy Cook, said phrases in the resolution such as “systemic racism” aren’t defined and mean different things to different people.
Since the resolution was adopted, the makeup of the board has flipped. Just two board members remain from 2020. Five new conservative members were elected in April 2022 and April 2023.
Cook, who was elected in 2022 and sponsored the revocation, said there is no plan to adopt an alternative resolution.
“In my opinion, the school board doesn’t need to be in the business of dividing the community,” Cook said. “We just need to stick to the business of educating students here and stay out of the national politics.”
(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) A dramatic incident unfolded on Capitol Hill as one of Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.,’s district offices caught fire shortly after he referred Dr. Anthony Fauci to face criminal proceedings.
While local authorities have not confirmed the source of the fire, some individuals have raised speculation about a potential connection between the two events, given Paul’s history of being the victim of political violence in the past.
According to the Bowling Green Daily News, the fire incident occurred on Friday morning in Paul’s Bowling Green office. The blaze led to a roof collapse and damage to the building’s structure.
Katie McKee, a spokesperson for the Bowling Green Fire Department, said there have been no injuries reported in the sudden fire. She said that the fire department requested additional assistance amid the rampant blaze. “And we have just been working on this structure fire ever since,” McKee told the Daily News.
Paul reacted to the fire in a statement, saying he will work with law enforcement to find the cause. “ “We are thankful for the Bowling Green first responders who arrived quickly to the scene to put out the fire, and are continuing to work with authorities to assess damages and to determine a cause,” he said. “We have a very well established emergency management plan and have the ability to continue operations that will not impact our work helping Kentuckians.”
The fire occurred hours before Paul made headlines by announcing that he had referred Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, to criminal proceedings.
Paul accuses Dr. Fauci of lying to Congress about the U.S. government’s funding of gain-of-function research in China. “I’ve referred Anthony Fauci to the DOJ (again) for lying to Congress when he denied the NIH was funding of gain-of-function research in Wuhan,” Paul said on July 17.
I’ve referred Anthony Fauci to the DOJ (again) for lying to Congress when he denied the NIH was funding of gain-of-function research in Wuhan. https://t.co/LuPDleRhYW
Following the news of the fire, some individuals have suggested a possible connection between the fire and the criminal referral, sparking rumors and discussions on social media despite the lack of evidence.
Scientist Robert Malone took to Twitter to insinuate, that there is a correlation between the two. Specifically, he said, “Why is this not headline news? Sen. Rand Paul has been targeted in the past and he have stored a lotimportant information, now destroyed.”
Prominent Twitter account TexasLindsay echoed Malone’s remarks, saying, “ICYMI: Senator @RandPaul went on Breitbart News and shared that he had referred Dr. Fauci for prosecution for lying under oath. Overnight his Kentucky office went up in flames.”
Senator Rand Paul sent a criminal referral to DOJ for Dr. Fauci to be prosecuted for lying to Congress and Paul's office in Kentucky caught on fire THE NEXT DAY but you think you're going to vote in a free election in 2024?
— Emerald Robinson ✝️ (@EmeraldRobinson) July 22, 2023
ICYMI: Senator @RandPaul went on Breitbart News and shared that he had referred Dr. Fauci for prosecution for lying under oath. Overnight his Kentucky office went up in flames. pic.twitter.com/5mjpm12x9s
(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) A Georgia woman, Donna Hansbrough, aged 68, was terminated from her job at Lowe’s after taking matters into her own hands to stop three brazen shoplifters who had stolen thousands of dollars worth of merchandise.
Hansbrough had been a dedicated employee at the company for 13 years until the incident occurred. According to Lowe’s, her termination was based on her violation of company policy against personally restraining shoplifters, even though her intentions were to prevent theft.
In an interview with the Effingham Herald, Hansbrough recounted the harrowing experience. She explained, “They say that if you see somebody stealing something out the door, not to pursue, not to go out. I lost it.” She further added, “I grabbed the cart. I don’t actually remember going out but I did. And I grabbed the cart that had the stolen items in [it].”
During the incident, one of the alleged perpetrators allegedly punched the 68-year-old woman in the face three times, causing her to sustain a black eye and injuries.
Law enforcement officials are currently searching for the accused perpetrators – Takyah Berry, Joseph Berry, and Jamar Lawton. They have released photos of these individuals and called on the community to report any sightings or information related to their whereabouts.
Responding to her termination, Hansbrough expressed her shock, saying, “didn’t expect to get terminated, maybe a reprimand or a suspension. I just got tired of seeing things get out the door. I just, I lost it. I basically lost all the training. Everything they tell you to do, I just…I just lost it.”
Hansbrough began her career at Lowe’s as a cashier and was later promoted to live-nursery specialist, showcasing her extensive experience in the field. However, she most recently worked as a customer service associate in the plans department before she was abruptly terminated.
Despite the traumatic incident, Hansbrough remains resilient and determined to find a new job. She asserted, “I can’t sit at home. I’m not that type of person,” and expressed her willingness to testify if law enforcement requires her cooperation.
Though she is still in the process of recovering from her injuries, there has been a decrease in the swelling around her eye since the incident occurred.
(Luis Cornelio, Headline USA) In a Friday interview on Fox News’s Kudlow, Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., made explosive allegations against the Biden administration, accusing the FBI of being “asleep at the wheel” and alleging IRS employees are “disgusted” by alleged corruption within the federal government.
During the interview, Donalds stated, “You have rank and file officers at the FBI who are probably disgusted with what’s going on with the political brass and the leadership at the FBI. This, in my view, is a cover-up.” He went on to assert that the FBI failed to investigate potential corruption cases adequately.
“You want to talk about where these conversations begin?” Donalds asked, referring to business dealings with numerous foreign entities. “My reading of it, this stuff started when Joe Biden was still vice president of the United States. That’s when this stuff was starting.” He further claimed that a confidential human source had reported information to the FBI over an extended period, but the bureau did not take substantial action.
An informant file, called an FD-1023, contained damning information related to an alleged bribery scheme involving Biden, his embattled son Hunter Biden and a high-ranking executive at Burisma. The file had remained confidential until last week, when Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, released the document.
Thx to whistleblowers now the world can see what ive seen & what the FBI tried to conceal Serious allegations from trusted FBI source What did the FBI do to investigate???? pic.twitter.com/7Asokoc6ao
Donalds also implicated former President Barack Obama and former Attorney General Eric Holder for allegedly ordering the FBI not to further investigate these allegations.
“This stuff is like a Tom Clancy novel,” he continued, “but there’s so much detail, and there’s so much evidence of this, and if you compare what we already know to the complete lack of evidence that they have against Donald Trump, yet they’re going after him with prosecution after prosecution, it’s indicative of the two-tiered system of justice in our country, and it demonstrates that there is clear corruption in the Department of Justice, in the FBI, at the political level, and we have to hold that accountable.”
As the allegations of corruption within the Biden administration and the FBI continue to unfold, some lawmakers are going a step further, asserting that the evidence uncovered must lead to the impeachment of Biden.
GOP Reps. Greg Stuebe, Fla., Anna Paulina Luna, Fla., Lauren Boebert, Colo., and Jim Banks, Ind., have all called for the impeachment of Biden. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy echoed those lawmakers’ concerns and said it is likely the evidence will lead the impeachment proceedings against the scandal-ridden president.
I have been getting a lot of questions on whether or not Biden will be impeached:
Two GOP members have filed privileged motions to impeach Biden. One of the two has to call up the vote. Meaning they have to bring it to the floor thus forcing the vote.
Based on the evidence and…
— Anna Paulina Luna (@realannapaulina) July 20, 2023
