Quantcast

Trump Lawyer: House Dems Have ‘Opened the Door’ to Biden Subpoenas

‘If there are new witnesses to be called, you would have to start with the ones who were not called to start with…’

CNN, NYT, Propagand
Hunter and Joe Biden / IMAGE: Donald J Trump via Youtube

(Ben Sellers, Liberty Headlines) Senate leaders from both sides sought to re-calibrate their stances regarding new witnesses after House impeachment managers on Thursday appeared to bolster Republicans’ argument that former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter should be subpoenaed.

“What I don’t understand is for the last five hours it’s been a lot about Joe Biden and Burisma. They kind of opened the door,” said Trump co-counsel Jay Sekulow on Thursday, following a lengthy presentation on the Ukraine scandal by Rep. Sylvia Garcia, D-Texas.

Despite insisting that there was not a “scintilla” of evidence implicating the Bidens in any wrongdoing, Garcia’s argument left several holes unaddressed.

Central to Trump’s likely defense—set to begin Saturday—is the contention that he was justified in asking newly elected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, during a July 25 phone call, to resume the “dormant” Burisma probes.

According to Breitbart, Garcia’s very use of the word “dormant” marked a concession from Democrats, who previously had maintained, falsely, that the Bidens had been exonerated by the Ukrainian investigations.

Former Ukrainian prosecutor–general Viktor Shokin has affirmed under sworn affidavit that he was pressured by the Petro Poroshenko administration in Ukraine and the Obama administration in the U.S.  to drop the Burisma investigations.

Some reports also have indicated that Shokin had recently conducted a series of raids on Burisma-related properties immediately prior to a lobbying campaign by well-connected Burisma “consultants”—Hunter Biden among them—to solicit the U.S. State Department’s support against the investigations.

A month later, in April 2016, Joe Biden visited the country and threatened to withhold a billion-dollar loan guarantee if Shokin wasn’t fired. He admitted to the quid-pro-quo extortion in a 2018 panel discussion with the Council on Foreign Relations.

Both Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-NY, and Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham, R-SC, two of the leading voices for their respective parties, seemed to buckle in their earlier stances over whether the prospect of testimony from the Bidens could open the door to new evidence being introduced in the impeachment trial.

Schumer has sought, unsuccessfully, to gain the votes of at least four centrist Republican senators for his proposed amendments to the trial rules, which would allow the introduction of new witnesses and the admission of new evidentiary documents beyond what the House was able to obtain in its investigation.

While some GOP senators have indicated already that they would support hearing new evidence after the opening arguments, Schumer claimed in an MSNBC interview on Thursday that the odds were against it, Breitbart reported.

[H]ow it will have to happen is not one person doing it, but a couple of them, when they talk privately say, maybe we should do it and get a group together of five or six or seven, and they do it together,” he said.

“Is that certain to happen? Not at all,” he continued. “Is it more [likely] than not? I’d have to say no. … But do we have a chance, and if we keep fighting as hard as we’ve been fighting, might those chances improve? Yes.”

Graham, meanwhile, reaffirmed in a press conference Friday that he opposed new witnesses and sought a speedy resolution to the trial but saw compelling reason for the Bidens to be further investigated.

“I don’t want to call Hunter Biden. I don’t wanna call Joe Biden,” he said. “I want somebody to look at that when this is done.”

Graham said he would assume that role in the Judiciary Committee if nobody else did.

“I think I’ve got enough from the public record to believe that [Democrats’] assertion [that no wrongdoing occurred] falls short,” he said.

However, after media continued to press the matter of calling additional impeachment witnesses, such as former national security adviser John Bolton, Graham appeared to backpedal and embrace the possibility.

“If there are new witnesses to be called, you would have to start with the ones who were not called to start with,” he said, noting that Democrats in the House had blocked a prior GOP-led resolution to subpoena the Bidens.

Schumer said earlier in the week that any sort of bargain allowing Hunter Biden’s testimony in return for Bolton’s was “off the table.”

TRENDING NOW

WHISTLEBLOWER: Bidens Knew of Likely Espionage Ties in Corrupt China Deal

Information from a whistleblower in the Hunter Biden laptop scandal not only corroborated the recovered hard-drive data but revealed that Biden associates knew they...

Ohio Sheriff Offers to Help Celebrities Leave the U.S. if Trump is Reelected

An Ohio sheriff went viral this week for offering to help Hollywood celebrities leave the U.S. if President Donald Trump is reelected. Butler County Sheriff...

Congressman Threatens to Pull Funding from NPR Over Hunter Biden Story

A House Republican threatened to pull funding from NPR, a taxpayer-subsidized media organization, after it announced it would not cover recent allegations made against...

Stuck in Delaware, Biden Tries to Clean Up Debate Mess as Trump Hits Trail

(Headline USA) President Donald Trump and his allies fought for momentum in election battleground states on Friday after a solid debate performance the night before...

GOP Sen. Commends FBI for FINALLY Taking Interest in Hunter Biden Scandal

A scheduled Friday morning interview between Hunter Biden's ex-business partner, Tony Bobulinski, and the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee was delayed after...