Quantcast

Supreme Court Again Asked to Block Biden Win in Pa.

Justices previously indicated they would consider constitutional challenge...

(Headline USA) Republicans on Thursday again asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block certification of a win by Democrat Joe Biden in Pennsylvania, while the state’s lawyers say fatal flaws in the original case mean justices are highly unlikely to grant it.

Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly of northwestern Pennsylvania and the other plaintiffs are asking the high court to prevent the state from certifying any contests from the Nov. 3 election, and undo any certifications already made, such as a Biden victory, while its lawsuit is considered.

They maintain that Pennsylvania’s expansive vote-by-mail law is unconstitutional because it required a constitutional amendment to authorize its provisions, rather than a directive from the state Supreme Court. The U.S. constitution states that the “legislatures” are responsible for making laws to determine states’ electors.

Justice Samuel Alito ordered the state’s lawyers to respond by Dec. 9, a day after what is known as the safe harbor deadline. That means that Congress cannot challenge any electors named by this date in accordance with state law.

Biden leads President Donald Trump by more than 80,000 votes in Pennsylvania, a state Trump had won in 2016.

- Advertisement -

Pennsylvania’s Democrat-dominated Supreme Court threw out the case Saturday. Kelly’s lawyers sought an injunction Tuesday in the U.S. Supreme Court, then withdrew it while they asked the state’s high court to halt any certifications until the U.S. Supreme Court acts. The state’s justices refused Thursday, and Kelly’s lawyers promptly refiled the case in the U.S. Supreme Court.

In the state’s courts, justices cited the law’s 180-day time limit on filing legal challenges to its provisions, as well as the demand that an entire election be overturned.

In addition to challenging the state’s mail-in voting law, Kelly’s lawyers question whether the state’s justices violated their clients’ constitutional rights by throwing out the case on the basis of time limits and barring them from refiling it on the same grounds.

Lawyers for Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, said in court filings that Kelly’s lawyers never before argued that the U.S. Constitution provides a basis for their claims, making it “highly unlikely” the U.S. Supreme Court will grant what they are seeking. However, Justices Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas indicated before Nov. 3 that they would vote to consider the case.

In the underlying lawsuit, Kelly and the other Republican plaintiffs had sought to either throw out the 2.5 million mail-in ballots submitted under the law or to wipe out the election results and direct the state’s Republican-controlled Legislature to pick Pennsylvania’s presidential electors.

- Advertisement -

Adapted from reporting by Associated Press.

- Advertisement -

TRENDING NOW

Two-Term Ohio Sen. Rob Portman Won’t Run for Reelection, Citing ‘Partisan Gridlock’

(Headline USA) Ohio Sen. Rob Portman said Monday that he won't seek reelection to a third term in 2022, expressing dismay with the deep...

Partisan Hack Sen. Patrick Leahy to Preside Over Trump Impeachment Trial

(Headline USA) It was learned on Monday that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is not expected to preside at the impeachment trial of now-former...

Republican-Led Legislatures Vow to Pass Changes to Clean Up Elections

After state legislatures in swing states failed to ensure secure and constitutional elections in 2020, some Republican legislators are pushing for reform, Politico reported. Arizona...

Demand for Physical Bullion Surges – Will It Break Paper Markets?

(Clint Siegner, Money Metals News Service) Last year felt like a pivot point in U.S. history. The pandemic and election left the nation ideologically divided. There...
- Advertisement -